Abstract
Introduction
The pandemic of obesity in adolescents is one of the challenges of public health.
Aim
The aim of this study was to examine the association of overweight with demographic, socioeconomic and lifestyle factors among Serbian adolescents.
Method
A cross-sectional study of 2139 adolescents aged 10 to 19 years was carried out. Data used in this study were from the 2006 Health Survey. In accordance with the international sex- and age-specific Body Mass Index cut-off points, all participants were classified as being normal weight or overweight, including obese. The association between the risk factors and overweight were examined using a multivariate logistic regression model.
Results
The study showed that 28.9% of boys and 17.0% of girls were overweight, while 14.5% of boys and 8.1% of girls were obese. Boys were more likely to be overweight/obese, compared with girls. Being younger (p< 0.01 for 14 to 15 years) and (p< 0.01, for 16 to 19 years), engaging in physical activities that last less than 7 hours a week, in such a manner that they breathe quickly and become sweaty, (p< 0.01) and skipping breakfast (p< 0.05) were risk factors significantly associated with overweight among adolescents. No significant association was found with wealth index.
Conclusion
These findings should be an integral part of further preventive interventions, especially oriented towards younger adolescents, who are physically inactive, have a habit of skipping breakfast and are boys.
Keywords: Overweight, risk factors, adolescents
Abstract
Namen
Pandemija debelosti pri mladostnikih predstavlja enega večjih izzivov za javno zdravje.
Cilj
Cilj te raziskave je bil preveriti povezanost prekomerne telesne teže med srbskimi mladostniki z demografskimi in s socialno-ekonomskimi dejavniki ter z dejavniki, ki so povezani z načinom življenja.
Metoda
Narejena je bila presečna študija z 2.139 mladostniki, ki so bili stari od 10 do 19 let. Za podatke v tej študiji so bile uporabljene vrednosti iz Health Survey 2006. Glede na mednarodno sprejete vrednosti indeksa telesne mase, povezane z odgovarjajočim spolom in starostjo, so bili vsi udeleženci uvrščeni v skupine z normalno težo, s prekomerno telesno težo in z debelostjo. Za ugotavljanje povezave med dejavniki tveganja in prekomerno telesno težo je bila uporabljena statistična metoda multivariantne logistične regresije.
Rezultati
Raziskava je pokazala, da je imelo 28,9% fantov in 17,0% deklet zvišano telesno težo, in sicer je bilo 14,5% fantov in 8,1% deklet debelih. V primerjavi z dekleti so bili fantje debelejši ali so imeli zvišano telesno težo. Za naslednje dejavnike tveganja smo ugotovili statistično pomembno povezavo s prekomerno telesno težo med mladostniki (starost 14–15 let (p<0,01) in 16–19 let (p<0,01)), ukvarjanje s telovadbo, ki povzroča hitro dihanje in potenje manj kot 7 ur dnevno(p< 0,01), ter vsakodnevno izogibanje zajtrku (p< 0,05). Na drugi strani ni statistično pomembne povezave med zvišano telesno težo/debelostjo in indeksom družinskega bogastva.
Zaključek
Ugotovitve naše študije bi lahko imele vpliv na preventivne ukrepe, ki bi bili posebej usmerjeni v mladostnike moškega spola, ki ne zajtrkujejo in se ne ukvarjajo z redno telesno aktivnostjo.
1 INTRODUCTION
The World Health Organization (WHO) defines adolescents as young people aged 10 to 19 years (1). Adolescents are usually viewed as a healthy population, since the routine health statistics data in the Republic of Serbia show the lowest rates of morbidity and mortality in this age group, so the health condition analysis is based on the health-oriented approach rather than the disease-oriented approach (2).
The risk factors referred to in the literature that are responsible for the occurrence of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents are hereditary and developmental factors, social and cultural environment factors, eating habits, the way of managing free time, physical activities and sports participation (3).
Overweight is caused by an imbalance between energy intake (calories originating from food) and energy expenditure (calories needed for basal metabolism and physical activities). In everyday practice, nutrition level is estimated on the basis of body weight and height and the calculation of the Body Mass Index (BMI). BMI is the most convenient way of measuring relative obesity; it can be easily calculated, relatively cheaply obtained, is highly acceptable by participants, which is particularly important for adolescents who may be reluctant during measuring, and it is correlated with percentage of body fat. BMI is more accurate when measurement is done by a trained person rather than self-reported. There is low observer error, low measurement error and good reliability and validity. However, BMI may not be a sensitive measure of body fat in people who have extreme muscular or disproportional body build or stunting growth. As a result of its advantages compared to other indirect methods, it is commonly used for population surveys (4).
BMI measure of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents is more complicated than for adults, because an ideal BMI for a child changes as they grow older and it differs between boys and girls. For children and adolescents, aged 2 to 20 years, value of BMI (index) is gender and age specific (4). Three international references are widely used to assess overweight and obesity in children and adolescents: the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) criteria, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) growth charts and the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (5).
The IOTF reference for children and adolescents 2–18 years old was developed in 2005 from a database of 192,727 children from birth to 25 years from six countries. Age and sex specific cut-off points that are extrapolated from the adult BMI cut-offs are 25 kg/m2 and 30 kg/m2 for overweight and obesity respectively. However, it has low sensitivity for diagnosing overweight and obesity compared with the other methods where body fat was taken as the gold standard and does not provide month-specific cut-off points (5).
The CDC growth reference for children 2–20 years old was issued in 2000 and developed using five national health examination surveys conducted between 1963 and 1994 in the United States of America. This growth reference defines children as at risk of overweight and obesity if their BMI exceeds the 85th and 95th percentiles in most routine assessments. Despite the fact that the CDC system is frequently used internationally, it was designed using only information from the United States with the objective of documenting obesity trends in that country (5).
The WHO Reference 2007 is a reconstruction of the 1977 National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS)/WHO reference. It uses the original NCHS data set supplemented with data from the WHO child growth standards sample for under-fives. The WHO classification is the only system designed using data from before the obesity epidemic, and it might be the most appropriate for countries where the prevalence of childhood obesity is still relatively low (5).
However, there is not a clear consensus on which classification system should be used to diagnose overweight and obesity (5).
The prevalence of overweight children and adolescents is growing around the world in both developed and developing countries. The increase in prevalence of obesity in children is particularly registered in the developed countries of North America and Europe, i.e. it has been 0.5% to 1% per year over the last two decades. Overweight and obesity are found in 20–30% of children and adolescents in the European Region of the WHO. The highest prevalence of overweight or obesity is registered in the countries of Southern Europe (6).
Given that overweight and obesity in adolescents are maintained into adulthood and associated with morbidity and increased risk of premature mortality from coronary heart disease, atherosclerosis and certain types of malignant disease, WHO indicates obesity as one of the most important public health problems (4).
The aims of this study were 1) to determine the prevalence of overweight and obesity and 2) to identify risk factors (demographic and socio-economic characteristics, eating habits, the way of managing free time and conducting physical activities) associated with the overweight in adolescents aged 10 to 19 years in the Republic of Serbia.
2 METHOD
2.1 The population included in the research
This research is a cross-sectional study on a sample of 2139 adolescents aged 10 to 19 years. In the research, the database from the «Health Survey of the citizens of the Republic of Serbia» study (without any data for Kosovo and Metohija) from 2006, conducted by the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Serbia, was used. A two-stage stratified sample was used. The main strata in the sample were six geographic regions: Vojvodina, Belgrade, Western Serbia, Central Serbia and Southeastern Serbia. In order to analyze further, each stratum was divided into urban and rural. In the first stage of sampling, 675 EAs (Enumeration Areas) from the Census of 2002 in Serbia were selected on the basis of Probability Proportional Sampling. After updating within each EA, a selection was made that included 10 households and 3 replacement households from the household list, using Simple Random Sampling without Replacement. In this way, 7673 selected households were made a sampling frame and observation units were all members of the selected households. Out of the 7673 households randomly selected for the sample, 6156 were interviewed. The household response rate was 86.5%. In selected households, 2139 adolescents aged 10 to 19 years were identified (7–16).
2.2 Instrument
Two types of questionnaires have been used for data collection: face-to-face questionnaire (a version for each child and adolescent aged 7 to 19 years, living in the household) and household questionnaire. Ten questions that were related to demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, physical activities and dietary habits of adolescents of the 81 questions from a face-to-face questionnaire were used. Socio-economic status was measured by calculating the demographic and health survey wealth index (wealth index) on the basis of answers to 9 questions from the household questionnaire that included 30 questions. The questionnaires correspond to the standard questionnaires used in this type of research (for example, World Health Organization 2002 Health Survey) (17). The surveys were conducted by trained interviewers. The process of data collection was standardized in order to ensure data quality. Considering that each household was carefully selected, the obligation of the interviewers was to interview all household members (17).
2.3 Measuring body height and weight
The trained health care workers, a nurse-technician or physician, measured body height and weight using an altimeter and medical metric scales with decimal numbers. The instructions for the measurement procedure are in accordance with the European Health Risk Monitoring (EHRM) Recommendation for indicators, international collaboration, protocol and manual of operations for chronic disease risk factors surveys. The calibration of the instruments occurred at the beginning and the end of each examining day. The scale was balanced with both sliding weights at zero and the balance bar aligned. The scale was checked using the standardized weights, and calibration was corrected if the error was greater than 0.2 kg. The height rule was checked with standardized rods and corrected if the error was greater than 2 mm (18). The percentages of adolescents who were not measured were 2.9% for weight and 1.9% for height (17). Based on these data, BMI was calculated by dividing the body weight (kg) by the body height squared (m2).
CDC growth charts were used to calculate BMI-for-age and sex for the population of children and adolescents. The points of intersection for identifying children and adolescents in relation to nourishment level were recommended. The interval between the 15th and 85th percentiles identifies people with normal body weight, while those with a BMI value higher or equal to the 85th percentile are overweight (between 85 and 95 have a high risk of obesity, and obese are those whose level is higher than or equal to 95) (19).
2.4 Demographic characteristics and socio-economic status of the respondents
The data on demographic characteristics and socio-economic status of the respondents have been separated from the database as independent variables: age, sex, type of settlement, household wealth index - Demographic and Health Survey Wealth Index (Wealth Index), family structure and success in school. The independent variables have been coded as follows: sex (1 - male, 2 - female), age (1 - from 10 to 13 years old, 2 – 14 to 15 years old, 3 – 16 to 19 years old), type of settlement (1 - rural, 2 - urban area), family income (1 - poorest, 2 - poorer, 3 – middle class, 4 - richer, 5 – richest), family structure (1-complete, 2-incomplete) and success in school (1 - not attending school, 2 - repeated a grade or sufficient, 3 - good, 4 - very good or excellent). The socio-economic status of adolescents was measured by calculating household wealth index, which was calculated on the basis of the answers to the questions referring to the ownership of various durable goods (the number of bedrooms per household; the materials the floor, roof and walls of the house were made of; the type of water supply and sanitation; the type of heating fuels; owning a color television, cell phone, refrigerator, washing machine, dishwasher, computer, air conditioner, central heating and car). Quintiles were used for a tabular Demographic and Health Survey analysis of wealth index, and the quintiles were based on the household population apportionment (five categories of 20%) (17).
2.5 Free time and physical activities of the respondents
The data referring to the manner in which adolescents spend free time and conduct physical activities were gathered based on the responses to the question of how much time daily or weekly they spend watching television, doing homework, sleeping and engaging in physical exercise so that they breathe quickly and become sweaty. The independent variables have been coded as follows: watching television (1 - less than 1 h/day, 2 - 1 h to 2 h, 3 - more than 3 h), doing homework (1 - less than 1 h/day, 2 - 1 h to 2 h, 3 - more than 3 h/day), the frequency of physical activities that cause them to breathe quickly or become sweaty during a week (1 - almost every day, 2 – 3 times a week, 3 - less than 3 times a week), engaging in physical activities that makes you breathe quickly or become sweaty (1 - more than 7 h/week, 2 - from 2 h to 6 h/week, 3 - less than 1 h/week) and sleeping at night on weekdays (1 - less than 4 h, 2 - from 5 h to 8 h, 3-more than 9 h/day).
2.6 Eating habits
The data concerning eating habits of adolescents were based on the responses to the question of how many times a week they eat breakfast and how often, during the previous week, they consumed fresh vegetables, fruits, sweets, sweet beverages and snacks. The independent variables were coded as follows: eating breakfast (1 - every day, 2 - sometimes, 3 – never), consumption of vegetables and fruits (1 – 6 to 7 times/week, 2 – 3 to 5 times/week, 3 – 1 to 2 times/week, 4 – none) and consumption of candies or confectionery, sugar - sweetened beverages and snacks (1 - none, 2 - 1 to 2 times, 3 - 3 to 5 times, 4 – 6 to 7 times/week).
2.7 Statistical analysis
For assessing statistical significance of differences in the prevalence of overweight/obesity, a nonparametric test (χ2 test) was used. The multiple logistic regression model was used to determine the association of overweight/obesity with the selected variables (demographic characteristics and socio-economic status, physical activities, the way of managing free time and eating habits). The odds ratio (ORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was adjusted by age and sex for each category.
The statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) ver.15.0 software package, with a minimum significance level of p<0.05.
3 RESULTS
Figure 1 shows the prevalence of overweight and obesity according to the age and sex categories. Nearly one fifth of the adolescents aged 10 to 19 years were overweight, of which 11.3% adolescents were obese. Specifically, 28.9% of boys and 17.0% of girls were overweight, while 14.5% of boys and 8.1% of girls were obese. The prevalence of overweight and obesity significantly decreased with the increase of the age category in males, while it significantly decreased in girls only between the first two age categories. Also, a statistically significant difference in the prevalence between the sexes within the age category of 10 to 13 years and 14 to 15 years was observed, with boys showing a higher prevalence of overweight and obesity than girls.
Figure 1.
The prevalence of overweight (including obesity) among adolescents aged 10 to 19 years, Serbia.
Significant difference* P < 0.05
Significant difference ** P < 0.01
Table 1 shows the association between the selected demographic and socio-economic characteristics of the respondents with the occurrence of overweight and obesity in adolescents. Multivariate logistic regression models showed a significant association of prevalence of overweight (including obesity) with sex and age in adolescents. Adolescents who were younger (OR = 0.58 or OR = 0.55 for adolescents 14 to 15 years old and OR = 0.34 or OR = 0.30 for adolescents 16 to 19 years old) and boys (OR= .55 or OR =.51) had a significantly higher risk of being overweight than older adolescents and girls. No significant association with the wealth index was found.
Table 1.
Association between the demographic and socio-economic characteristics with the occurrence of overweight and obesity in Serbian adolescents aged 10–19 years.
| Number of participants (%) | Unadjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) | Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)† | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Total n=2139 |
Normal weight n=1385 |
Overweight/obese n=470 |
|||
| Sex | |||||
| Boys | 1077 | 651(47.0 %) | 290 (61.7 %) | 1 | 1 |
| Girls | 1062 | 734 (53.0 %) | 180 (38.3 %) | 0.55(0.44–0.68)** | 0.51 (0.40–0.65)** |
| Total | 2139 | 1385 | 470 | ||
| Age | |||||
| 10 – 13 | 873 | 503 (36.3 %) | 270 (57.4 %) | 1 | 1 |
| 14 – 15 | 468 | 308 (22.2 %) | 96 (20.4 %) | 0.58 (0.44–0.76)** | 0.55 (0.41–0.73)** |
| 16 – 19 | 798 | 574 (41.4 %) | 104 (22.1 %) | 0.34 (0.26–0.44)** | 0.30 (0.22–0.41)** |
| Total | 2139 | 1385 | 470 | ||
| Setllement | |||||
| Non-urban | 1153 | 616 (44.5 %) | 228 (48.5 %) | 1 | 1 |
| Urban | 986 | 769 (55.5 %) | 242 (51.5 %) | 0.80 (0.62–1.02) | 0.80 (0.62–1.04) |
| Total | 2139 | 1385 | 470 | ||
| Wealth index | |||||
| Poorest | 378 | 250 (18.1 %) | 84 (17.9 %) | 1 | 1 |
| Poorer | 460 | 298 (21.5 %) | 86 (18.3 %) | 0.88 (0.61–1.25) | 1.01 (0.70–1.46) |
| Middle class | 431 | 272 (19.6 %) | 107 (22.8 %) | 1.24 (0.87–1.75) | 1.45 (1.01–2.08) |
| Richer | 496 | 320 (23.1 %) | 114 (24.3 %) | 1.12 (0.78–1.60) | 1.27 (0.87–1.84) |
| Richest | 374 | 245 (17.7 %) | 79 (16.8 %) | 1.08 (0.72–1.63) | 1.28 (0.84–1.96) |
| Total | 2139 | 1385 | 470 | ||
| Family structure | |||||
| Complete | 207 | 137 (10.2 %) | 43 (9.3 %) | 1 | 1 |
| Incomplete | 1873 | 1210 (89.8 %) | 417 (90.7 %) | 1.00 (0.70–1.45) | 1.00 (0.68–1.46) |
| Total | 2080 | 1347 | 460 | ||
| School success | |||||
| Not attending school | 236 | 163 (12.4 %) | 37 (8.1 %) | 1 | 1 |
| Repeated or sufficient | 43 | 29 (2.2%) | 7 (1.5 %) | 1.15 (0.46–2.86) | 0.75 (0.29–1.93) |
| Good | 446 | 276 (21.0 %) | 106 (23.2 %) | 1.82 (1.17–2.85) | 1.03 (0.63–1.67) |
| Very good or excellent | 1310 | 844 (64.35 %) | 306 (67.1 %) | 1.70 (1.12–2.56) | 0.91 (0.56–1.46) |
| Total | 2035 | 1312 | 456 | ||
Adjusted for sex and age
Significantly different from reference group (P < 0.05)
Significantly different from reference group (P < 0.01)
When observing the association between the selected variables of the physical activities and the way of managing free time with the occurrence of overweight and obesity in adolescents, a statistically significant association of prevalence of overweight (including obesity) with variable of the physical activities lasting less than 7 hours a week, in such a way that you breathe quickly and become sweaty can be noticed. Specifically, the adolescents who spent physical activities less than 7 hours a week (OR = 25.04 or OR = 25.70 for physical activities 2 to 6 hours/a week; OR = 22.93 or OR = 21.35 for physical activities less than 1 hours/a week) were at risk in comparison with those who conducted physical activities more than 7 hours a week (Table 2).
Table 2.
Association between the variables of the physical activities and the way of managing free time with the occurrence of overweight and obesity in Serbian adolescents aged 10–19 years.
| Number of participants (%) | Unadjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) | Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)† | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Normal weight | Overweight/obese | |||
| Television | ||||
| < 1 hr/day | 215 (16.2 %) | 66 (14.6 %) | 1 | 1 |
| 1 – 2 hr/day | 517 (39.0 %) | 201 (44.4 %) | 1.43 (.98–2.11) | 1.42 (.96–2.10) |
| > 2 hr/day | 593 (44.8 %) | 186 (41.1 %) | 1.27(.87–1.87) | 1.27 (.86–1.88) |
| Homework | ||||
| < 1 hr/day | 367 (29.7 %) | 134 (31.0 %) | 1 | 1 |
| 1 – 2 hr/day | 491 (39.8 %) | 194 (44.9 %) | 1.13 (.84–1.52) | 1.21 (.89–1.65) |
| > 2 hr/day | 376 (30.5 %) | 104 (24.1 %) | .73 (.52–1.03) | .86 (.60–1.23) |
| Physical activities | ||||
| almost every day | 354 (26.2 %) | 134 (28.9 %) | 1 | 1 |
| 3 times a week | 339 (25.1 %) | 127 (27.4 %) | .80 (.58–1.10) | 1.02 (.73–1.42) |
| less than 3 times a week | 659 (48.7 %) | 202 (43.6 %) | 1.00 (.74–1.36) | 1.14 (.83–1.56) |
| Physical activities | ||||
| > 7 hr/a week | 63 (6.1 %) | 28 (7.5 %) | 1 | 1 |
| 2 – 6 hr/a week | 444 (43.2 %) | 169 (45.2 %) | 25.04 (3.43–182.92)** | 25.70 (3.50–188.71)** |
| < 1 hr/a week | 521 (50.7 %) | 177 (47.3 %) | 22.93 (3.14–167.50)** | 21.35 (2.91–156.65)** |
| Sleeping | ||||
| < 4 hr/day | 12 (.9 %) | 4 (.9 %) | 1 | 1 |
| 5–8 hr/day | 1049 (76.7 %) | 336 (71.7 %) | .62 (.18–2.15) | .62 (.17–2.31) |
| > 9 hr/day | 307 (22.4 %) | 129 (27.5 %) | .99 (.28–3.52) | .85 (.23–3.17) |
Adjusted for sex and age
Significantly different from reference group (P < 0.05)
Significantly different from reference group (P < 0.01)
Table 3 presents the association of the selected variables regarding specific eating habits with the occurrence of overweight and obesity. Specifically, we noted a statistically significant association for only one variable and only after adjusting for age and sex. Namely, the adolescents who skipped breakfast had a significantly higher risk of becoming overweight/obesity compared with those who had breakfast every day.
Table 3.
Association between the variables regarding eating habits with overweight and obesity in Serbian adolescents.
| Number of participants (%) | Unadjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) | Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)† | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Normal weight | Overweight/obese | |||
| Breakfast | ||||
| Every day | 1201 (86.8 %) | 406 (86.6 %) | 1 | 1 |
| Sometimes | 168 (12.1 %) | 60 (12.8 %) | .66 (.19–2.35) | .94(.26–3.44) |
| Never | 14 (1.0 %) | 3 (.6 %) | 1.13 (.82–1.56) | 1.43 (1.02–2.01)* |
| Vegetables | ||||
| 6 to 7 times/week | 680 (49.3 %) | 240 (51.5 %) | 1 | 1 |
| 3 to 5 times/week | 396 (28.7 %) | 137 (29.4 %) | 1.33 (.80–2.21) | 1.30 (.77–2.20) |
| 1 to 2 times/week | 224 (16.3 %) | 59 (12.7 %) | .81 (.56–1.17) | .71 (.49–1.04) |
| None | 78 (5.7 %) | 30 (6.4 %) | .99 (.75–1.30) | .88 (.66–1.17) |
| Fruits | ||||
| 6 to 7 times/week | 683 (49.7 %) | 246 (52.6 %) | 1 | 1 |
| 3 to 5 times/week | 432 (31.4 %) | 148 (31.6 %) | .72 (.38–1.35). | .67 (.35–1.28) |
| 1 to 2 times/week | 193 (14.0 %) | 56 (12.0 %) | .85 (.58–1.25) | .94 (.64–1.40) |
| None | 66 (4.8 %) | 18 (3.8 %) | .95 (.73–1.24) | 1.02 (.77–1.35) |
| Sweets | ||||
| None | 112 (8.1 %) | 34 (7.3 %) | 1 | 1 |
| 1 to 2 times/week | 409 (29.7 %) | 145 (31.0 %) | 1.46 (.76–2.82) | 1.15 (.71–1.86) |
| 3 to 5 times/week | 537 (39.1 %) | 197 (42.1 %) | 1.45 (.76–2.77) | 1.12 (.68–1.84) |
| 6 to 7 times/week | 317 (23.1 %) | 92 (19.7 %) | 1.38 (.71–2.66) | .84 (.49–1.45) |
| Sweet beverages | ||||
| None | 61 (4.4 %) | 14 (3.0 %) | 1 | 1 |
| 1 to 2 times/week | 282 (20.5 %) | 100 (21.4 %) | 1.46 (.76–2.82) | 1.39 (.70–2.76) |
| 3 to 5 times/week | 537 (39.1 %) | 190 (40.7 %) | 1.44 (.76–2.77) | 1.38 (.70–2.72) |
| 6 to 7 times/week | 495 (36.0 %) | 163 (34.9 %) | 1.38 (.71–2.66) | 1.41 (.71–2.82) |
| Snacks | ||||
| None | 159 (11.6 %) | 59 (12.6 %) | 1 | 1 |
| 1 to 2 times/week | 466 (33.9 %) | 159 (33.9 %) | .87 (.60–1.26) | .78 (.53–1.15) |
| 3 to 5 times/week | 540 (39.3 %) | 184 (39.2 %) | .86 (.59–1.26) | .79 (.54–1.17) |
| 6 to 7 times/week | 210 (15.3 %) | 67 (14.3 %) | .89 (.56–1.41) | .80 (.50–1.28) |
Adjusted for sex and age
Significantly different from reference group (P < 0.05)
Significantly different from reference group (P < 0.01)
4 DISCUSSION
The prevalence of overweight children and adolescents is growing around the world in both developed and developing countries. The results of our study, which showed that 22.0% of adolescents aged 10 to 19 years (26.9% boys and 17.0% girls) were overweight and that 11.3% of them (14.5% boys and 8.1% girls) were obese, indicated that Serbia is among the countries with high prevalence. Specifically, among European countries, the highest prevalence has been found in Southern European countries, particularly in Greece (44.4% boys and 37.7% girls aged 10 to 12 years), Malta (38.9% boys and 30.1% girls aged 10 to 11 years) and Cyprus (37.5% boys and 34.1% girls aged 10 to 12 years). Also, Slovenia is among the European countries with high prevalence (31.7% boys and 22.5% girls aged 10 to 12 years) (20). This is confirmed by the data of a national study with a sample of 2474 adolescents aged 15 to 16 years (17.1% boys and 15.4% girls were overweight and 6.2% boys and 3.8% girls were obese) (21). Data from the survey examined excess weight and obesity in a population of Slovenian boys and girls aged seven to eighteen from 1991 to 2011 and revealed that obesity is growing at higher rates than excess weight, as it was almost three times higher among both sexes over just 20 years (overweight boys 13.3% in 1991 vs. 19.9% in 2011; overweight girls 12.0% vs. 17.2%; obese boys 2.7% vs. 7.5%; obese girls 2.1% vs. 5.5%) (22).
Our data have shown a statistically significant association between age and sex with the overweight. A declining trend in the prevalence of overweight with age is contrary to the survey data in developed countries, where either stable (23, 24) or positive trends (25) have been registered. In contrast, three Brazilian studies have shown the same trend as our study (26–28).
A greater prevalence of overweight in boys compared to girls is consistent with the research results (29–32), while some studies have found no statistically significant difference when it comes to sexes (33, 34).
There is a lot of literature that has demonstrated socioeconomic inequalities in obesity among children in both high- and low-income countries – however, the direction of this association differs by economic context (35–43). Sobal and Stunkard’s review of the literature on the relationship between socioeconomic status and obesity included 144 studies published before 1989 with data on cross-sectional associations between SES and obesity in women, men and children from developed and developing countries. For girls and boys respectively, inverse associations were found in 40 studies, no associations in 35 and positive associations in 25 (42). Similarly, Shrewsbury and Wardle’s review of 45 cross-sectional studies from 1990–2005 from developed and developing countries found that socioeconomic factors were inversely associated with adiposity in 19 studies, there was no association in 12 studies and in 14 studies there was a mixture of no associations and inverse associations across subgroups. Generally, in high-income countries, there is a strong inverse association between socioeconomic factors and obesity, whereas socioeconomic status and obesity are directly associated in low-income countries (43). A Slovenian national study showed a statistically significant association between high income families and the habit of consuming fresh fruits 1 or more times per day and engaging in physical activities 60 minutes per day, every day of the week (44). Health Behavior in School-aged Children study 2009/2010 in Slovenia showed that increased prevalence of overweight/obesity was significantly associated with low family affluence for girls and boys (45). The only study that associated socioeconomic factors with overweight/obesity in Serbia found a connection between high family income and female obesity (46). Our study did not find a statistically significant association between wealth index and the occurrence of overweight/obesity in adolescents.
Family functioning, which may also be linked to behavioral and psychological factors, has often been the interest of research (47, 48), while aspects of family structure (single parent families, number of siblings, birth order of child, age of mother at the birth of her child) have only rarely been examined and the results were inconsistent (49). In this study, the association of the variable referring to family structure with the occurrence of overweight and obesity wasn’t found.
Researchers examined school performance as a variable associated with adolescents being overweight. In one review, which examined this association, it found that being or becoming overweight in adolescence was associated with poor school performance (50). The results of this study didn’t find an association.
A large number of cross-sectional studies have investigated the association between eating habits and the occurrence of overweight/obesity. Namely, skipping breakfast is a powerful predictor for the occurrence of overweight/obesity in adolescents in both developed countries (28, 51, 52) and developing countries (53–55). Findings from the review of the prospective studies showed a negative association between breakfast consumption and BMI. In fact, breakfast consumption may be associated with decreased fat and snack intake later in the day, and it may a marker of health behavior of preparing food and eating at the table (56). Our research confirmed the results of the previously mentioned studies.
Among dietary factors linked with obesity, high-fat and sugar-containing foods have been the most studied. While overconsumption of these foods leads to excessive weight gain and obesity, consuming a diet high in fruits and vegetables protects against obesity.
The choice of beverage deserves special attention as a potential obesity risk factor in children and adolescents. Findings from recent systematic reviews ranged from no evidence to strong evidence for the independent role of the intake of sugar-sweetened beverages in the promotion of weight gain and obesity in children and adolescents (57, 58). Cross-sectional studies (59–61), as well as observational follow-up studies (62–64), showed positive associations between intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and overweight/obesity.
Although snack foods are generally high in both fat and calories and low in micronutrients or micronutrient density, prospective studies reported that they were not an important independent determinant of weight gain among children and adolescents (63, 65, 66).
Fruits and vegetables have high water and dietary fiber contents, making them low in energy density. However, a recent review of 23 longitudinal or experimental studies about fruit and vegetable intake and adiposity levels in children (67) showed an unclear relationship among children. Most studies in the review found no association, while only half of the child longitudinal studies found a significant inverse association. In a cross-sectional analysis, lifestyle pattern, including the consumption of vegetables, cooked meals and eating dinner, was negatively associated with obesity (68). Likewise, the findings of a review of 3 prospective, 10 cross sectional and 1 case control studies do not support a protective association between fruit or vegetable consumption and childhood obesity (69). Janssen I et al. showed, in a systematic review of a cross-sectional survey of 137,593 youth (10–16 years) from the 34 (primarily European) participating countries of the 2001–2002 Health Behavior in School-Aged Children Study, that overweight status was not associated with the intake of fruits, vegetables and soft drinks (70).
When considering an association of prevalence of overweight with the consumption of sweets, studies reported frequent consumption of sweets among other lifestyle factors significantly associated with obesity and overweight (27, 71–73). However, eating sweets was negatively associated with overweight/obesity in only two cross sectional studies (37, 74). Our data have shown no statistically significant association between the above-mentioned dietary factors and the overweight.
Lack of physical activity is a known determinant of obesity. Unfortunately, children become less and less active as they reach and progress through adolescence. Rauner A et al., in a review of twelve cross-sectional and two longitudinal studies, found that all studies reported inverse relations between physical fitness or physical activity and overweight. Only four studies analyzed the interaction among physical activity, fitness and overweight in adolescents and reported inconsistent results (75). One other systematic review of the cross-sectional studies examined the associations of physical activity and sedentary behavior to childhood and adolescent overweight and obesity and reported mixed results (76). Findings from a review of prospective observational studies published in English between 1990 – 2007 reported that physical activity showed more consistent inverse associations with fatness outcomes than for weight status, but the magnitudes of association were modest (56). Our study has shown a statistically significant association between conducting physical activities less than 7 h a week and the occurrence of overweight/obesity.
Several studies have specifically examined the relationship between television viewing and adolescents’ risk of overweight. Although some find only weak relationships (77, 78), several others have found that hours of television viewing were closely associated with increased levels of obesity in cross-sectional and prospective studies (79–85). This discrepancy may reflect the replacement of television viewing with other forms of inactivity in older children, especially for girls. The results of a prospective study by Gortmaker et al. (86) showed a strong dose–response relationship between hours of television viewing and the prevalence of overweight at the end of the period. Those children who watched more than 5 h of television per day were five times as likely to be overweight than their counterparts who watched 2h or less of television per day. Our research has shown that there is no statistically significant association between overweight and habits of watching television.
The link between pediatric obesity, higher body fat and sleep duration has been widely demonstrated in the literature (87). In contrast to other sources of inactivity, short sleep duration is associated with excess weight (88). Interestingly, differences in risk have been shown between boys and girls, with the relationship between sleep and overweight seeming to be stronger among boys (89, 90). Our research has shown that there is no statistically significant association between overweight and sleep duration.
The limitations of the study are the difficulties in determining the direction of the cause-effect relationship and the fact that the resulting association does not necessarily reflect the association between the exposure and the morbidity risk, which are the main limitations of these studies. These deficiencies can be remedied by performing longitudinal studies, but those studies are expensive, time-consuming and involve a risk of the respondents dropping out. When it comes to data collection, the observed limitation is biasness in the data provision (older respondents and girls).
5 CONCLUSION
The prevalence of overweight, including obesity, in Serbia has reached the level of leading Southern European countries. This study showed an association between sex, age, physical inactivity and habit of skipping breakfast with the prevalence of overweight among adolescents in Serbia.
These findings should be an integral part of further preventive interventions, especially those oriented towards younger adolescents, who are physically inactive, have a habit of skipping breakfast and are boys.
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
- WHO
World Health Organization
- BMI
Body Mass Index
- IOTF
The International Obesity Task Force
- CDC
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- NCHS
National Center for Health Statistics
- EAs
Enumeration Areas
- EHRM
European Health Risk Monitoring
- Wealth Index
Demographic and Health Survey Wealth Index
- OR
Odds Ratio
- Cl
Confidence Interval
- SPSS
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
- SD
Standard Deviation.
Footnotes
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that no conflict of interest exist.
FUNDING
The study is a part of the 2006 National Health Survey for the population of Serbia (without data on Kosovo and Metohia) that was carried out by the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Serbia with financial and professional support of the World Bank, the World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (country office Serbia) and the Institute of Public Health of Serbia ‘Dr Milan Jovanovic Batut’.
ETHICAL APPROVAL
Ethical approval was received from the Review Board of the Ministry of Health of Serbia and the Institute of Public Health of Serbia.
REFERENCES
- 1.World Health Organization. Adolescent friendly health services. Available June 7, 2012 from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2003/WHO_FCHCAH02.14.pdf.
- 2.The Ministry of Youth and Sport of the Republic of Serbia. National strategy for youth. Belgrade: Ministry of Youth and Sport of the Republic of Serbia; 2008. Available May 5, 2012 from: http://www.zamislizivot.org/html/images/nacionalna-strategija-za-mlade.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Raj M, Kumar K. Obesity in children & adolescents. Indian J Med Res. 2010;132:598–607. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lobstein T, Baur L, Uauy R IASO International Obesity Task Force. Obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health. Obes Rev. 2004;5(Suppl 1):4–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2004.00133.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gonzalez-Casanova I, Sarmiento OL, Gazmararian JA, Cunningham SA, Martorell R, Pratt M, et al. Comparing three body mass index classification systems to assess overweight and obesity in children and adolescents. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013;33:349–55. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892013000500006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Branca F, Nikogosian H, Lobstein T, editors. The challenge of obesity in the WHO European Region and the strategies for response. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2007. Available May 25, 2012 from: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/74746/E90711.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jeremić V, Matejić B, Soldatović I, Radenović S. Early sexual initiation and risk factors in Serbian adolescents: data from the National Health Survey. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2014;19:211–9. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2014.897320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Antić L, Djikanović B, Vuković D, Kaludjerović V. Do women in rural areas of Serbia rarely apply preventive measures against cervical cancer? Vojnosanit Pregl. 2014;71:277–84. doi: 10.2298/vsp120906041a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Antić L, Djikanović B, Vuković D. Family planning among women in urban and rural areas in Serbia. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2013;141:794–9. doi: 10.2298/sarh1312794a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Djikanovic B, Vukovic D, Djikanovic S. Inequalities in intentions to quit smoking in Serbia: data from 2006 National Health Survey. Public Health. 2013;127:521–9. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2012.12.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Janković J, Janević T, von dem Knesebeck O. Socioeconomic inequalities, health damaging behavior, and self-perceived health in Serbia: a cross-sectional study. Croat Med J. 2012;53:254–62. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Janković J, Simić S. The association of demographic and socioeconomic determinants and self-perceived health. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2012;140:77–83. doi: 10.2298/sarh1202077j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jankovic J, Marinkovic J, Simic S. Utility of data from a national health survey: do socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity exist in Serbia? Scand J Public Health. 2011;39:230–8. doi: 10.1177/1403494811401477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Grujić V, Dragnić N, Radić I, Harhaji S, Susnjević S. Overweight and obesity among adults in Serbia: results from the National Health Survey. Eat Weight Disord. 2010;15:e34–42. doi: 10.1007/BF03325278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Janković J, Simić S, Marinković J. Inequalities that hurt: demographic, socio-economic and health status inequalities in the utilization of health services in Serbia. Eur J Public Health. 2010;20:389–96. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vuković D, Bjegović V, Vuković G. Prevalence of chronic diseases according to socioeconomic status measured by wealth index: health survey in Serbia. Croat Med J. 2008;49:832–41. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2008.49.832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.The Ministry of Health of the Republic of Serbia. Health Survey of the population of Serbia 2006: main findings. Belgrade: Ministry of Health of the Republic of Serbia; 2007. Available May 5, 2012 from: http://download.moh1.googlepages.com/FinalniIzvestaj-IstrazivanjeZdravlja.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 18.ECHM Recommendation for indicators, international collaboration, protocol and manual of operations for chronic disease risk factors surveys. 2002. Available Sept 5, 2013 from: http://www.ktl.fi/publications/ehrm/product2/part_iii3.htm.
- 19.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Growth Charts. Available May 7, 2013 from: http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/cdc_charts.htm.
- 20.International Association for the Study of Obesity. Prevalence of overweight of children living in the EU 27 - measured heights & weights. Obesity data portal. Available Sept 5, 2013 from: http://www.iaso.org/resources/obesity-data-portal/
- 21.Avebelj M, Saje-Hribar N, Seher-Zupančič M, Brcar P, Kotnik P, Irišič A, et al. Overweight and obesity prevalence among 5-year-old children and 15- and 16-year –old adolescents in Slovenia. Zdrav Vestn. 2005;74:753–9. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kovač M, Jurak G, Leskošek B. The prevalence of excess weight and obesity in Slovenian children and adolescents from 1991 to 2011. Anthrop Notebooks. 2012;18:91–103. [Google Scholar]
- 23.The Ministry of Health. A Portrait of Health: key results of the 2006/07 New Zealand Health Survey. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Lamb MM, Flegal KM. Prevalence of high body mass index in US children and adolescents, 2007–2008. JAMA. 2010;303:242–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Stamatakis E, Wardle J, Cole TJ. Childhood obesity and overweight prevalence trends in England: evidence for growing socioeconomic disparities. Int J Obesity. 2010;34:41–7. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wang Y, Monteiro C, Popkin BM. Trends of obesity and underweight in older children and adolescents in the United States, Brazil, China, and Russia. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;75:971–7. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/75.6.971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Barbiero SM, Pellanda LC, Cesa CC, Campagnolo P, Beltrami F, Abrantes CC. Overweight, obesity and other risk factors for IHD in Brazilian schoolchildren. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12:710–5. doi: 10.1017/S1368980008003200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Duncan S, Duncan EK, Fernandes RA, Buonani C, Bastos KD, Segatto AF, et al. Modifiable risk factors for overweight and obesity in children and adolescents from São Paulo, Brazil. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:585. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Balaban G, Silva GA. Overweight and obesity prevalence in children and adolescents from a private school in Recife. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2001;77:96–100. doi: 10.2223/jped.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Costa RF, de Cintra IP, Fisberg M. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in school children of Santos city, Brazil. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2006;50:60–7. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27302006000100009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fernandes RA, Kawaguti SS, Agostini L, de Oliveira AR, Ronque ERV, Freitas If., Jr Prevalence of overweight and obesity among students at private schools in Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano. 2007;9:21–7. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fernandes RA, Conterato I, Messias KP, Christofaro DG, de Oliveira AR, Freitas IF., Junior Risk factors associated with overweight among adolescents from western Sao Paulo state. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2009;43:768–73. doi: 10.1590/s0080-62342009000400005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.de Oliveira AM, de Cerqueira EM, de Oliveira AC. Prevalence of overweight and childhood obesity in Feira de Santana-BA: family detection vs. clinical diagnosis. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2003;79:325–8. doi: 10.2223/jped.1052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.da Costa Ribeiro I, Taddei JA, Colugnatti F. Obesity among children attending elementary public schools in Sao Paulo, Brazil: a case–control study. Public Health Nutr. 2003;6:659–63. doi: 10.1079/phn2003473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ahn MK, Juon HS, Gittelsohn J. Association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, acculturation, and environmental factors with risk of overweight among adolescents in California, 2003. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008;5:A75. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hanson MD, Chen E. Socioeconomic status, race, and body mass index: the mediating role of physical activity and sedentary behaviors during adolescence. J Pediatr Psychol. 2007;32:250–9. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsl024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Andersen LF, Lillegaard IT, ⊘verby N, Lytle L, Klepp KI, Johansson L. Overweight and obesity among Norwegian schoolchildren: changes from 1993 to 2000. Scand J Public Health. 2005;33:99–106. doi: 10.1080/140349404100410019172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Veugelers PJ, Fitzgerald AL. Prevalence of and risk factors for childhood overweight and obesity. CMAJ. 2005;173:607–13. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shi Z, Lien N, Kumar BN, Dalen I, Holmboe-Ottesen G. The sociodemographic correlates of nutritional status of school adolescents in Jiangsu Province, China. J Adolesc Health. 2005;37:313–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.El-Sayed AM, Scarborough P, Galea S. Socioeconomic inequalities in childhood obesity in the United Kingdom: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Facts. 2012;5:671–92. doi: 10.1159/000343611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Dinsa GD, Goryakin Y, Fumagalli E, Suhrcke M. Obesity and socioeconomic status in developing countries: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2012;13:1067–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01017.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sobal J, Stunkard AJ. Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature. Psychol Bull. 1989;105:260–75. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.2.260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shrewsbury V, Wardle J. Socioeconomic status and adiposity in childhood: a systematic review of cross-sectional studies 1990–2005. Obesity. 2008;16:275–84. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Jeriček Klanšček H, Gabrijelčič Blenkuš M, Zupanič T. Socioekonomski položaj družine in izbrani kazalniki zdravja mladostnikov v Sloveniji. Zdrav Var. 2012;51:87–94. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Currie C, Zanotti C, Morgan A, Currie D, de Looze M, Roberts C, et al., editors. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: international report from the 2009/2010 survey. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe; 2012. Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rakic R, Bozic-Krstic V, Pavlica T. Relationship between overweight, obesity and socioeconomic factors of adolescents in Vojvodina, Serbia. HOMO – J Comp Hum Biol. 2011;52:307–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jchb.2011.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Scaglioni S, Arrizza C, Vecchi F, Tedeschi S. Determinants of children’s eating behavior. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(Suppl 6):2006S–11S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.001685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Scaglioni S, Salvioni M, Galimberti C. Influence of parental attitudes in the development of children eating behaviour. Br J Nutr. 2008;99(Suppl 1):S22–5. doi: 10.1017/S0007114508892471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Parsons TJ, Power C, Logan S, Summerbell CD. Childhood predictors of adult obesity: a systematic review. Int J Obes. 1999;23(Suppl 8):S1–S107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Taras H, Potts-Datema W. Obesity and student performance at school. J Sch Health. 2005;75:291–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.00040.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Duncan JS, Schofield G, Duncan EK, Rush EC. Risk factors for excess body fatness in New Zealand children. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008;17:138–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Deshmukh-Taskar PR, Nicklas TA, O’Neil CE, Keast DR, Radcliffe JD, Cho S. The relationship of breakfast skipping and type of breakfast consumption with nutrient intake and weight status in children and adolescents: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2006. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:869–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Dialektakou KD, Vranas PB. Breakfast skipping and body mass index among adolescents in Greece: whether an association exists depends on how breakfast skipping is defined. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108:1517–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.06.435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Maddah M, Nikooyeh B. Factors associated with overweight in children in Rasht, Iran: gender, maternal education, skipping breakfast and parental obesity. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13:196–200. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009990589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Henriquez Sanchez P, Doreste Alonso J, Lainez Sevillano P, Estévez González MD, Iglesias Valle M, López Martín G, et al. Prevalence of obesity and overweight in adolescents from Canary Islands, Spain. Relationship with breakfast and physical activity. Medicina Clinica. 2008;130:606–10. doi: 10.1157/13120339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Must A, Barish EE, Bandini LG. Modifiable risk factors in relation to changes in BMI and fatness: what have we learned from prospective studies of school-aged children? Int J Obes (Lond) 2009;33:705–15. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Malik VS, Schulze MB, Hu FB. Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84:274–88. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/84.1.274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Gibson S. Sugar-sweetened soft drinks and obesity: a systematic review of the evidence from observational studies and interventions. Nutr Res Rev. 2008;21:134–47. doi: 10.1017/S0954422408110976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Berkey CS, Rockett HR, Field AE, Gillman MW, Colditz GA. Sugar-added beverages and adolescent weight change. Obes Res. 2004;12:778–88. doi: 10.1038/oby.2004.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Giammattei J, Blix G, Marshak HH, Wollitzer AO, Pettitt DJ. Television watching and soft drink consumption: associations with obesity in 11- to 13-year-old schoolchildren. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:882–6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.9.882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Nicklas TA, Yang SJ, Baranowski T, Zakeri I, Berenson G. Eating patterns and obesity in children: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Prev Med. 2003;25:9–16. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00098-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ludwig DS, Peterson KE, Gortmaker SL. Relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and childhood obesity: a prospective, observational analysis. Lancet. 2001;357:505–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04041-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Phillips SM, Bandini LG, Naumova EN, Cyr H, Colclough S, Dietz WH, et al. Energy-dense snack food intake in adolescence: longitudinal relationship to weight and fatness. Obes Res. 2004;12:461–72. doi: 10.1038/oby.2004.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Welsh JA, Cogswell ME, Rogers S, Rockett H, Mei Z, Grummer-Strawn LM. Overweight among low-income preschool children associated with the consumption of sweet drinks: Missouri, 1999–2002. Pediatrics. 2005;115:e223–9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Field AE, Austin SB, Gillman MW, Rosner B, Rockett HR, Colditz GA. Snack food intake does not predict weight change among children and adolescents. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28:1210–6. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.O‘Loughlin J, Gray-Donald K, Paradis G, Meshefedjian G. One- and two-year predictors of excess weight gain among elementary schoolchildren in multiethnic, low-income, inner-city neighborhoods. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:739–46. doi: 10.1093/aje/152.8.739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ledoux TA, Hingle MD, Baranowski T. Relationship of fruit and vegetable intake with adiposity: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2011;12:e143–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00786.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Yannakoulia M, Ntalla I, Papoutsakis C, Farmaki AE, Dedoussis GV. Consumption of vegetables, cooked meals, and eating dinner is negatively associated with overweight status in children. J Pediatr. 2010;157:815–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.04.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Newby PK. Plant foods and plant-based diets: protective against childhood obesity? Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89:1572S–87S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Boyce WF, Vereecken C, Mulvihill C, Roberts C, et al. Comparison of overweight and obesity prevalence in school-aged youth from 34 countries and their relationships with physical activity and dietary patterns. Obesity Rev. 2005;6:123–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2005.00176.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kouéta F, Dao L, Dao F, Djekompté S, Sawadogo J, Diarra Y, et al. Factors associated with overweight and obesity in children in Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso) Sante. 2011;21:227–31. doi: 10.1684/san.2011.0272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Novac O, Mătăsaru S, Tătaru S, Felea D, Cosmescu A, Stoian M, et al. Clinical and epidemiologic aspects of overweight and nutritional habits of schoolchildren and teenagers. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2010;114:721–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Amin TT, Al-Sultan AI, Ali A. Overweight and obesity and their relation to dietary habits and socio-demographic characteristics among male primary school children in Al-Hassa, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Eur J Nutr. 2008;47:310–8. doi: 10.1007/s00394-008-0727-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Li M, Dibley MJ, Sibbritt D, Yan H. Factors associated with adolescents’ overweight and obesity at community, school and household levels in Xi’an City, China: results of hierarchical analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008;62:635–43. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Rauner A, Mess F, Woll A. The relationship between physical activity, physical fitness and overweight in adolescents: a systematic review of studies published in or after 2000. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Prentice-Dunn H, Prentice-Dunn S. Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and childhood obesity: a review of cross-sectional studies. Psychol Health Med. 2012;17:255–73. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2011.608806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Kimm SY, Barton BA, Obarzanek E, McMahon RP, Sabry ZI, Waclawiw MA, et al. Racial divergence in adiposity during adolescence: the NHLBI growth and health study. Pediatrics. 2001;107:E34. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.3.e34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Robinson TN, Hammer LD, Killen JD, Kraemer HC, Wilson DM, Hayward C, et al. Does television viewing increase obesity and reduce physical activity? Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses among adolescent girls. Pediatrics. 1993;91:273–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Storey ML, Forshee RA, Weaver AR, Sansalone WR. Demographic and lifestyle factors associated with body mass index among children and adolescents. Intl J Food Sci Nutrit. 2003;54:491–503. doi: 10.1080/09637480310001622350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Dietz WH, Jr, Gortmaker SL. Do we fatten our children at the television set? Obesity and television viewing in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 1985;75:807–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Wake M, Hesketh K, Waters E. Television computer use and body mass index in Australian primary school children. J Paediatr Child Health. 2003;39:130–4. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2003.00104.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Hernandez B, Gortmaker SL, Colditz GA, Peterson KE, Laird NM, Parra-Cabrera S. Association of obesity with physical activity, television programmes and other forms of video viewing among children in Mexico city. Int J Obes. 1999;23:845–54. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Ruangdaraganon N, Kotchabhakdi N, Udomsubpayakul U, Kunanusont C, Suriyawongpaisal P. The association between television viewing and childhood obesity: a national survey in Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai. 2002;85(Suppl 4):S1075–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Krassas GE, Tzotzas T, Tsametis C, Konstantinidis T. Determinants of body mass index in Greek children and adolescents. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2001;14(Suppl 5):1327–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Hanley AJ, Harris SB, Gittelsohn J, Wolever TM, Saksvig B, Zinman B. Overweight among children and adolescents in a Native Canadian community: prevalence and associated factors. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71:693–700. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/71.3.693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Gortmaker SL, Must A, Sobol AM, Peterson K, Colditz GA, Dietz WH. Television viewing as a cause of increasing obesity among children in the United States, 1986–90. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150:356–62. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170290022003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Hart CN, Cairns A, Jelalian E. Sleep and obesity in children and adolescents. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2003;58:715–33. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2011.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Must A, Parisi SM. Sedentary behavior and sleep: paradoxical effects in association with childhood obesity. Int J Obes. 2009;33(Suppl 1):S82–6. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Sekine M, Yamagami T, Handa K, Saito T, Nanri S, Kawaminami K, et al. A dose-response relationship between short sleeping hours and childhood obesity: results of the Toyama Birth Cohort Study. Child Care Health Dev. 2002;28:163–70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2214.2002.00260.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Eisenmann JC, Ekkekakis P, Holmes M. Sleep duration and overweight among Australian children and adolescents. Acta Paediatr. 2006;95:956–63. doi: 10.1080/08035250600731965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

