Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2016 Mar 17;113(13):3419–3421. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601789113

Drilling and modeling studies expose Antarctica’s Miocene secrets

Amelia E Shevenell a,1
PMCID: PMC4822609  PMID: 26987666

In PNAS, two companion studies by Levy et al. (1) and Gasson et al. (2) underscore the importance of ice-proximal geologic data for improving computer models of Antarctic ice sheet response to oceanic and atmospheric warming. Current knowledge of Antarctic ice sheet evolution (∼40–0 Ma) is based on deep-sea records of global ice volume, deep ocean temperature, and carbon cycling preserved in the calcium carbonate shells of benthic foraminifera (3, 4). Shackleton and Kennett (5) hypothesized, from moderate-resolution southwest Pacific Ocean benthic foraminifer stable oxygen (δ18O) and carbon (δ13C) isotope compilations, that the deep ocean cooled ∼15 °C through the Cenozoic and that Antarctic ice sheets expanded significantly at the Eocene–Oligocene boundary, varied dynamically until the middle Miocene climate transition (MMCT; 14.2–13.8 Ma), and then rapidly expanded and stabilized. Over the last 41 y, paleoceanographers have used deep-sea sediments recovered by scientific ocean drilling programs, including the International Ocean Discovery Program (2013–2023), to increase the resolution of the global deep-sea stable isotope record (35), develop geochemical methods to separate ice volume and temperature signals contained in the δ18O signal (4), and resolve climate forcings and feedbacks involved in Antarctic ice growth and global climate evolution (4, 6).

Because of a lack of high-quality ice-proximal drill sites, only a handful of studies (e.g., refs. 1 and 7) directly link Antarctic ice sheet variability to far-field deep-sea δ18O (35) and passive margin sea-level records (8). Such linkages are required to improve understanding of the timing and magnitude of ice volume fluctuations, relative contributions of Antarctica’s ice sheets to global eustacy, individual histories of the East and West Antarctic ice sheets, and climatic boundary conditions favorable for ice growth and decay (3). In PNAS, Levy et al. (1) present well-dated ice-proximal evidence for dynamic Antarctic ice sheets and climate in the Ross Sea during the warm Miocene Climatic Optimum (MCO; ∼17–14.5 Ma) and subsequent cooling of the MMCT (Fig. 1) (36, 9, 10). In a companion paper, Gasson et al. (2) describe major advances in coupled climate and ice sheet model ability to simulate observed Antarctic ice sheet variability in a narrow range of atmospheric pCO2 (partial pressure of CO2) and temperature. Taken together, these two studies provide insights into climate forcings, feedbacks, and sensitivity during the enigmatic middle Miocene.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Early to middle Miocene section of AND-2A correlated to selected datasets. (A) Southern Ocean and Antarctica with present day locations of AND-2A and Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Site 1171. (B) AND-2A lithologic log tied to age with gray shading indicating time missing from the AND-2A core; purple dashed lines: maximum ice sheet advance; blue shading: cold polar intervals; green dashed lines: peak warmth (1). Southern Ocean ice volume (δ18O seawater; blue; black arrows indicate intervals of glacial expansion), bottom water temperatures (purple), and sea surface temperatures (black), derived from foraminifer stable isotope and trace metal proxies from ODP Site 1171 (9, 13). Proxy atmospheric pCO2 data include boron isotopes (blue circles), alkenones (black triangles), stomata (green diamonds), and paleosols (orange squares) (11). Thick gray line represents 21 point weighted average (1). (C) Cold (gray box) and warm (green box) ice sheet simulations after Gasson et al. (2). (D) Schematic of high-latitude drilling transects proposed to capture ice-proximal to ice-distal glacial-marine to marine sedimentary sequences.

The MCO is of particular interest because geologic records indicate that atmospheric pCO2 fluctuated within a narrow range [280–500 parts per million by volume (ppmv)] (11), encompassing both present day concentrations and predictions for the next half-century (12). Average global MCO temperatures were 3–4 °C warmer than present with reduced equator-to-pole thermal gradients (10, 13, 14). Deep-sea stable isotopes suggest substantial Antarctic ice sheet variability and a shift in global carbon cycling (36, 9, 10). Thus, Miocene geologic data suggest that either Earth’s climate system is so sensitive to pCO2 that slight increases above modern levels may result in substantial warming through positive feedbacks, or that MCO warmth, MMCT cooling, and the associated Antarctic ice sheet response was decoupled from carbon cycling (914). To date, MCO warmth and MMCT cooling cannot be explained by simply changing atmospheric pCO2, indicating that a combination of influences (e.g., tectonically driven ocean circulation changes and orbital forcing) worked to increase middle Miocene climate sensitivity (911, 13, 14).

Levy et al. (1) present evidence of middle Miocene Antarctic ice sheet fluctuations from an ice-proximal sedimentary sequence recovered in Southern McMurdo Sound (AND-2A) by the multinational Antarctic Geologic Drilling Project (Fig. 1). The recovery of AND-2A was technologically remarkable. It was drilled from a floating sea-ice platform using riser drilling technology in shallow water, resulting in high (>80%) core recovery. Using an integrated age model, Levy et al. (1) reconstruct MCO glacial dynamism long-suspected from both near-field Antarctic terrestrial and continental shelf studies, and far-field ice volume and sea-level records (3, 810, 1316). Because of reworking inherent in Antarctic margin sediments, the multiproxy approach strengthens Levy et al.’s middle Miocene paleoenvironmental interpretations. Ocean temperatures from two recently developed geochemical paleothermometers (17, 18) are integrated with pollen and geochemical data to provide insight into the evolution of the regional environment. Although these paleothermometers are not yet calibrated adequately to assess absolute ocean temperatures at high latitudes (17, 18), intervals of relative ocean warmth coincide with independent marine and terrestrial pollen, spore, and geomorphologic evidence for regional warmth, meltwater influx, and ice retreat into the Transantarctic Mountains between 16.4 and 15.8 Ma (1, 10, 16). Additionally, a series of three chronologically constrained missing and condensed sections in the AND-2A drill core mark the MCO onset and MMCT progression of ice advance across the Ross Sea continental shelf (15).

Levy et al. (1) integrate the shallow ice-proximal AND-2A record with far-field deep-sea records. This integration reveals that dynamic Antarctic ice sheets existed when the southern high latitudes were relatively warm and pCO2 was 300–500 ppmv, confirming the MCO’s reduced equator-to-pole thermal gradient (Fig. 1) (1, 4, 911, 13). Models cannot yet replicate this result without very high (>1,000 ppmv) atmospheric pCO2 concentrations not indicated by the majority of paleo-pCO2 proxy records (2, 6, 11, 14). The timing of missing sequences in the AND-2A drill core coincide with deep-sea geochemical evidence for ice growth, further supporting observational and model interpretations of Antarctic ice sheet expansion (1, 2, 8). Although Levy et al. (1) discuss missing sections at 14.7–14.6 Ma and 14.1–13.7 Ma and highlight their association with low (<300 ppmv) pCO2 (11), they do not interpret the 15.5–14.8 Ma gap in the AND-2A record. This gap is also coincident with deep-sea geochemical changes, confirming previous interpretations that Antarctic ice growth began at ∼15.5 Ma when high-latitude temperatures were relatively warm (8, 13) and atmospheric pCO2 was slightly higher than present (∼400–500 ppmv) (Fig. 1) (8, 11). This evidence, coupled with model consensus that MCO warmth remains difficult to explain without invoking significant but poorly quantified climate feedbacks (14), suggests the modern relationship between atmospheric pCO2 and temperature may not exist during the middle Miocene.

In a companion paper, Gasson et al. (2) present new climate-ice sheet modeling advances that enable dynamic Antarctic ice sheets within a narrow range of atmospheric pCO2 and temperature (11). These results are a dramatic step forward because they solve a model hysteresis problem, which limits ice retreat from a fully glaciated state unless unrealistically large atmospheric pCO2 or temperature increases are imposed (2, 6, 14). Isotope-enabled model reconstructions indicate that large-scale Antarctic ice sheet expansion caused the gaps in the AND-2A sequence, rather than localized Transantarctic Mountain outlet glacier variability. These results are consistent with deep-sea geochemical and Ross Sea continental shelf sequence stratigraphic data (1, 9, 15). Although the long-standing mismatch between data and models for middle Miocene ice sheet behavior may be resolved (6), a major uncertainty remains: the reconstruction of past Antarctic bedrock topography, critical for determining individual Antarctic ice sheet histories, global eustacy contributions, and the role of ocean thermal forcing on past ice sheets (2, 8, 9, 19). Depending on the choice of subglacial bedrock topography, Gasson et al. (2) reveal that the middle Miocene West Antarctic Ice Sheet may not have been marine-based. As such, its Miocene response may not be a useful analog for its future response in a warming world. Furthermore, East Antarctica’s subglacial basins may be more important contributors to the past global eustatic signal (2, 19). Today, the marine-based East Antarctic Ice Sheet contains 19 m of sea-level–equivalent (19) and –associated outlet glaciers are experiencing instability because of warm ocean waters interacting with deep grounding lines (20); however, the East Antarctic Ice Sheet has traditionally been considered relatively stable (5, 10).

The PNAS papers of Levy et al. (1) and Gasson et al. (2) highlight recent successes of integrated drilling and modeling studies. These studies indicate that a synchronous continent-wide Antarctic response to climate perturbations during past climate transitions is unlikely. Thus, there is a critical need for additional scientific drilling in multiple ice-proximal Antarctic margin locations and in the ice-distal Southern Ocean, particularly at paleolatitudes >50°S and paleodepths <2.5 km. Additionally, to address Miocene climate sensitivity and relationships between tectonics, ocean circulation, Earth’s orbits, and carbon cycling (36, 811, 13, 14), a network of high-resolution Miocene sedimentary sequences from a range of depths and latitudes is required. Strategic drilling targets are also needed to study the tectonic evolution of oceanic gateways, as large uncertainties exist surrounding the timing of significant Miocene tectonic changes [e.g., the Drake Passage (21), Central American Seaway (22), and Tethys gateways (23)]. Resulting data will enable development of a consistent Miocene modeling framework, as has been accomplished for the warm Pliocene (24).

Footnotes

The author declares no conflict of interest.

See companion articles on pages 3453 and 3459.

References

  • 1.Levy R, et al. Antarctic ice sheet sensitivity to atmospheric CO2 variations in the early to mid-Miocene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:3453–3458. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1516030113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gasson E, DeConto RM, Pollard D, Levy RH. Dynamic Antarctic ice sheet during the early to mid-Miocene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:3459–3464. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1516130113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zachos J, Pagani M, Sloan L, Thomas E, Billups K. Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present. Science. 2001;292(5517):686–693. doi: 10.1126/science.1059412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cramer BS, Miller KG, Barrett PJ, Wright JD. Late Cretaceous–Neogene trends in deep ocean temperature and continental ice volume: Reconciling records of benthic foraminiferal geochemistry (δ18O and Mg/Ca) with sea level history. J Geophys Res-Oceans. 2011;116:C12023. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shackleton N, Kennett JP. Paleotemperature history of the Cenozoic and initiation of Antarctic glaciation: Oxygen and carbon isotopic analyses in DSDP Sites 277, 279, and 281. Init Rep Deep Sea. 1975;29:743–755. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Deconto RM, et al. Thresholds for Cenozoic bipolar glaciation. Nature. 2008;455(7213):652–656. doi: 10.1038/nature07337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Naish T, et al. Obliquity-paced Pliocene West Antarctic ice sheet oscillations. Nature. 2009;458(7236):322–328. doi: 10.1038/nature07867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kominz MA, et al. Late Cretaceous to Miocene sea level estimates from the New Jersey and Delaware coastal plain coreholes: An error analysis. Basin Res. 2008;20:211–226. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shevenell AE, Kennett JP, Lea DW. Middle Miocene ice sheet dynamics, deep-sea temperatures and carbon cycling: A Southern Ocean perspective. Geochem Geophys Geosyst. 2008;9:Q02006. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Flower BP, Kennett JP. The middle Miocene climate transition: East Antarctic ice sheet development, deep ocean circulation and global carbon cycling. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 1994;108(1994):537–555. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang YG, Pagani M, Liu Z, Bohaty SM, DeConto R. A 40-million-year history of atmospheric CO2. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2013 doi: 10.1098/rsta.2013.0096. 371:20130096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Menheisen M, et al. The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Clim Change. 2011;109(1-2):213–241. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shevenell AE, Kennett JP, Lea DW. Middle Miocene Southern Ocean cooling and Antarctic cryosphere expansion. Science. 2004;305(5691):1766–1770. doi: 10.1126/science.1100061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Goldner A, Herold N, Huber M. The challenge of simulating the warmth of the mid-Miocene Climatic Optimum in CESM1. Clim Past. 2014;10:523–536. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.DeSantis L, Anderson JB, Brancolini G, Zayatz I. Seismic record of Late Oligocene through Miocene glaciation on the central and eastern continental shelf of the Ross Sea. In: Cooper AK, Barker PF, Brancolini G, editors. Geology and Seismic Stratigraphy of the Antarctic Margin. Vol 68. American Geophysical Union; Washington, DC: 1995. pp. 235–260. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lewis AR, et al. Mid-Miocene cooling and the extinction of tundra in continental Antarctica. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(31):10676–10680. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802501105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Eagle RA, et al. The influence of temperature and seawater carbonate saturation state on 13C-18O bond ordering in bivalve mollusks. Biogeosciences. 2013;10(7):4591–4606. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kim J-H, et al. New indicies and calibrations derived from the distribution of crenarcheal isoprenoid tetraether lipids: Implications for past sea surface temperature resconstructions. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2010;74(16):4639–4654. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fretwell P, et al. Bedmap2: Improved ice bed, surface, and thickness datasets for Antarctica. Cryosphere. 2013;7(1):375–393. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rignot E, Jacobs S, Mouginot J, Scheuchl B. Ice-shelf melting around Antarctica. Science. 2013;341(6143):266–270. doi: 10.1126/science.1235798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dalziel IWD, et al. A potential barrier to deep Antarctic circumpolar flow until the late Miocene? Geology. 2013;41(9):947–950. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Montes C, et al. Middle Miocene closure of the Central American Seaway. Science. 2015;348(6231):226–229. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa2815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hamon N, Sepulchre P, Lefebvre V, Ramstein G. The role of eastern Tethys seaway closure in the middle Miocene Climate Transition (ca. 14 Ma) Clim Past. 2013;9:2687–2702. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Haywood AM, et al. Large-scale features of Pliocene climate: Results from the Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project. Clim Past. 2013;9:191–209. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES