Skip to main content
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1980 Feb;43(2):202–205. doi: 10.1136/hrt.43.2.202

Clinical evaluation of Dinamap 845 automated blood pressure recorder.

J H Silas, A T Barker, L E Ramsay
PMCID: PMC482263  PMID: 7362713

Abstract

The Dinamap 845 blood pressure recorder has been evaluated over a wide range of blood pressure by comparison with the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer in 32 subjects, six of whom had a cardiac arrhythmia. Group mean radings for systolic and phase 5 diastolic pressure were almost identical but Dinamap diastolic values were on average significantly lower (mean difference 3.4 mmHg) than phase 4 diastolic readings obtained with the Hawksley machine. Correlations between readings with the two instruments were high but the slopes and intercepts of the regression for systolic but not diastolic pressure were significantly different from unity and zero, respectively. The Dinamap is easy to use, portable, and capable of rejecting some motion artefact. Its major disadvantage is that the systolic blood pressure measurement is limited to a maximum of 210 mmHg, a point not made clear in the manufacturer's literature. Nevertheless, the Dinamap 845 is acceptable for blood pressure determinations in subjects who are normotensive or who have mild hypertension.

Full text

PDF
202

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hunyor S. N., Flynn J. M., Cochineas C. Comparison of performance of various sphygmomanometers with intra-arterial blood-pressure readings. Br Med J. 1978 Jul 15;2(6131):159–162. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6131.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. RICHARDSON D. W., HONOUR A. J., FENTON G. W., STOTT F. H., PICKERING G. W. VARIATION IN ARTERIAL PRESSURE THROUGHOUT THE DAY AND NIGHT. Clin Sci. 1964 Jun;26:445–460. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Raftery E. B. The methodology of blood pressure recording. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1978 Sep;6(3):193–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1978.tb04585.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ramsey M., 3rd Noninvasive automatic determination of mean arterial pressure. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1979 Jan;17(1):11–18. doi: 10.1007/BF02440948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Thulin T., Andersson G., Scherstén B. Measurement of blood pressure--a routine test in need of standardization. Postgrad Med J. 1975 Jun;51(596):390–395. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.51.596.390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wright B. M., Dore C. F. A random-zero sphygmomanometer. Lancet. 1970 Feb 14;1(7642):337–338. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(70)90709-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES