Skip to main content
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1980 Mar;43(3):284–292. doi: 10.1136/hrt.43.3.284

Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound.

L Hatle, B A Angelsen, A Tromsdal
PMCID: PMC482277  PMID: 7437175

Abstract

The peak pressure drop across the aortic valve in aortic stenosis has been measured by Doppler ultrasound. Maximum velocity in the Doppler signal from the aortic jet was recorded using a maximum frequency estimator. With an angle close to zero between ultrasound beam and maximal velocity in the jet, peak pressure drop can be calculated from the maximal velocity measured; a larger angle will underestimate maximal velocity and pressure drop. In 57 of 63 patients with aortic stenosis, the aortic jet could be reached by the ultrasound beam and, in 37 of these, peak pressure drop by ultrasound was compared with that obtained at catheterisation. In patients less than 50 years of age the aortic jet was easy to find, the measurement was reproducible, and underestimation of the pressure drop obtained at catheterisation was within 25 per cent in 17 of 18 patients. In patients over 50 years Doppler signals from the aortic jet were more difficult to obtain, and pressure drop was significantly underestimated in one-third, but time of maximum velocity in systole could indicate whether moderate or severe aortic stenosis was present.

Full text

PDF
284

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bonner A. J., Jr, Sacks H. N., Tavel M. E. Assessing the severity of aortic stenosis by phonocardiography and external carotid pulse recordings. Circulation. 1973 Aug;48(2):247–252. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.48.2.247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brubakk A. O., Angelsen B. A., Hatle L. Diagnosis of valvular heart disease using transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound. Cardiovasc Res. 1977 Sep;11(5):461–469. doi: 10.1093/cvr/11.5.461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. GAMBOA R., HUGENHOLTZ P. G., NADAS A. S. ACCURACY OF THE PHONOCARDIOGRAM IN ASSESSING SEVERITY OF AORTIC AND PULMONIC STENOSIS. Circulation. 1964 Jul;30:35–46. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.30.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hatle L., Brubakk A., Tromsdal A., Angelsen B. Noninvasive assessment of pressure drop in mitral stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Br Heart J. 1978 Feb;40(2):131–140. doi: 10.1136/hrt.40.2.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Holen J., Aaslid R., Landmark K., Simonsen S. Determination of pressure gradient in mitral stenosis with a non-invasive ultrasound Doppler technique. Acta Med Scand. 1976;199(6):455–460. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1976.tb06763.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Oakley C. M., Hallidie-Smith K. A. Assessment of site and severity in congenital aortic stenosis. Br Heart J. 1967 May;29(3):367–379. doi: 10.1136/hrt.29.3.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES