Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Apr 7;6:24197. doi: 10.1038/srep24197

Potential use of bacterial community succession for estimating post-mortem interval as revealed by high-throughput sequencing

Juanjuan Guo 1, Xiaoliang Fu 1, Huidan Liao 1, Zhenyu Hu 2, Lingling Long 1, Weitao Yan 1, Yanjun Ding 1, Lagabaiyila Zha 1, Yadong Guo 1, Jie Yan 1, Yunfeng Chang 1, Jifeng Cai 1,a
PMCID: PMC4823735  PMID: 27052375

Abstract

Decomposition is a complex process involving the interaction of both biotic and abiotic factors. Microbes play a critical role in the process of carrion decomposition. In this study, we analysed bacterial communities from live rats and rat remains decomposed under natural conditions, or excluding sarcosaphagous insect interference, in China using Illumina MiSeq sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons. A total of 1,394,842 high-quality sequences and 1,938 singleton operational taxonomic units were obtained. Bacterial communities showed notable variation in relative abundance and became more similar to each other across body sites during the decomposition process. As decomposition progressed, Proteobacteria (mostly Gammaproteobacteria) became the predominant phylum in both the buccal cavity and rectum, while Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in the mouth and rectum, respectively, gradually decreased. In particular, the arrival and oviposition of sarcosaphagous insects had no obvious influence on bacterial taxa composition, but accelerated the loss of biomass. In contrast to the rectum, the microbial community structure in the buccal cavity of live rats differed considerably from that of rats immediately after death. Although this research indicates that bacterial communities can be used as a “microbial clock” for the estimation of post-mortem interval, further work is required to better understand this concept.


Decomposition is a complex process involving both biotic (cellular enzymes of the cadaver, bacteria, fungi, protozoa, insects and carnivores) and abiotic (weather, climate and humidity) factors. The decomposition of vertebrates can be categorised into stages based on the physical appearance of the remains and the associated arthropod arrival patterns. A body commonly passes through several stages as decomposition progresses. Vass1 described the progression of human decomposition as taking place in four stages: fresh (autolysis), bloat (putrefaction), decay (putrefaction and carnivores) and dry (diagenesis). Wolff et al.2 observed five different stages of decomposition: fresh, bloated, active decay, advanced decay and dry, which were determined by the physical and body temperature changes of the carcass. Decomposition begins approximately 4 min after death with a process called autolysis or self-digestion3. Enzymes from within the dead cells of the cadaver begin to release and damage cellular components and metabolites4,5. Shortly after death, intrinsic bacteria also begin to digest the body from the inside. When vertebrate scavengers are prohibited, the loss of biomass is driven primarily by immature Diptera and microbes6. If sarcosaphagous insect colonisers have access to a corpse, they use the carrion as a nutrient source and oviposition site, with blowfly larvae alone capable of consuming over 80% of the available material7.

Post-mortem interval (PMI) estimation is one of the most important and difficult tasks in forensic practice. Traditionally, estimation of PMI has relied on the physical changes that occur after death, including algor mortis, livor mortis, rigor mortis and supravital activity, which are well recognised as early post-mortem phenomena8,9. However, because these states do not continue into the late post-mortem period, they can only provide a rough estimation of the PMI. In recent years, additional techniques have been employed for estimating the PMI of animal remains, including examining thanatochemistry10,11,12, DNA/RNA degradation13,14 and forensic entomology15,16. However, none of these methods are widely accepted by forensic science experts, and accurate PMI estimation remains a challenge.

From the viewpoint of forensic entomologists, the PMI can be divided into two principal parts: the pre-colonisation interval (pre-CI), which spans the period between the time of death and the arrival of sarcosaphagous insects, and the post-colonisation interval (post-CI), which is applied to the broad time range between initial insect colonisation and body corruption17. Forensic entomologists can estimate the post-CI based on the presence of specific families and species of insects that feed on the corpse (mainly those in the orders Diptera and Coleoptera)18. In contrast, in the pre-CI or in colder months when insects are not active, the metabolic activities of microbes constitute the major components of the decomposition process.

Past studies of microbes were primarily based on culture-dependent techniques19,20,21. Using a mouse model of decomposition, Melvin et al.19 demonstrated that Staphylococcus species were the first microorganisms to migrate from the small intestine, followed by coliforms and Candida, and then anaerobic bacteria. However, it is estimated that up to 99% of bacterial species found in nature cannot be cultured by conventional means22, and approximately 80% of bacteria identified by metagenomic sequencing were considered noncultivable23. The rapid development of parallel high-throughput sequencing technologies has resulted in the commercialisation and widespread adoption of next-generation sequencing technologies for analysis of bacterial community structure. As such, there are numerous studies incorporating bacterial community analysis in the evaluation of carrion decomposition processes and estimating PMI in terrestrial ecosystems6,24,25,26.

Pechal et al.26 defined the epinecrotic community as those organisms residing, or moving, on the surface of decomposing remains, including the skin and mucous membranes of cavities (e.g., mouth). This community is primarily made up of prokaryotes, protists and fungi. In this study, we used high-throughput sequencing to investigate epinecrotic community composition and succession during the decomposition process for the purpose of estimating PMI. These data may be able to uncover the underlying microbial ecology of corpse decomposition, as well as provide additional information to aid in finding a linear relationship for using microbes as a potential tool for forensic purposes. We conducted exploratory investigations of the epinecrotic community from live rats and their decomposed cadavers under both sarcosaphagous insect exclusion and access conditions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the bacterial biodiversity in decomposing rats under terrestrial conditions in China.

Results

Progression of decomposition

The average daily air temperature was 25.74 ± 1.80 °C (s.d.), and ranged from 22.71 to 27.67 °C. The mean daily air humidity was 73.28 ± 10.65% (s.d.), and ranged from 60.29 to 89.38% during the study. And accumulated degree hours (ADHs) increased linearly throughout decomposition (Supplementary Fig. S1). Rats in the sarcosaphagous insect exclusion group (group A) merely progressed to the active decay stage of decomposition during the 8-day observation period, while rats in the sarcosaphagous insect access group (group B) progressed through all stages of decomposition. The fresh stage began at the time of death, with a sharp decrease in body temperature, corneal opacity, cyanosis and rigor mortis. The bloat stage occurred 12 h post-mortem in group B (333 ADH) and 18 h post-mortem (480 ADH) in group A, and was characterised by the expansion of the torso because of gas accumulation. The active decay stage occurred 2 days post-mortem (1268 ADH) in group B and 4 days post-mortem (2445 ADH) in group A, and was indicated by strong odour, abdominal rupture and putrefactive fluid leakage. The advanced decay stage was initiated 4 days post-mortem (2445 ADH) in group B, and was characterised by an absence of odour, the removal of the majority of the soft tissue and the presence of third instar Calliphoridae and Sarcophagidae larvae. The dry stage occurred 6 days post-mortem (3624 ADH) in group B and represented the end of decomposition, with the vast majority of soft tissue removed and only remains of skin and bones still present.

In group B, an adult Lucilia cuprina (Diptera: Calliphoridae) was the first insect to arrive on the carcass, 8 h post-mortem (230 ADH). Adults of the families Calliphoridae and Sarcophagidae oviposited in the natural orifices (e.g. oral cavity, nares, external meatus and anus), on the neck and on the side of the carcass touching the ground during the bloat and active decay stage. Second and third instar Calliphoridae and Sarcophagidae larvae were found during both the active and advanced decay, mainly located in large masses that were concentrated towards the side of the carcass that was touching the ground. The great abundance (ranging from 66.19% to 85.71%) of adult Calliphoridae were noted in the dipterans collected from the fresh stage to advanced decay stage. The larvae dispersed from the carcass in the dry stage to pupate, leaving only a few adult Muscidae and Silphidae (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2).

Overview of sequencing analysis

A total of 1,413,910 raw sequences were generated in the current study. After sequence trimming, quality filtering and removal of chimeras, 1,394,842 high-quality sequences remained, with an average length of 253 bases. The mean number of sequences per sample was 41,676 ± 16,976 (s.d.). The rarefaction curves indicated that species representation in each sample had approached the plateau phase, and it was unlikely that more bacteria would be detected with additional sequencing efforts (Supplementary Fig. S2). These high-quality sequences were clustered into 10,977 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) by the UPARSE pipeline27 using a threshold of 97% identity, with an average of 333 OTUs per sample. In total, 1,938 OTUs were singletons. We classified 99.92 ± 0.11% (s.d.) of high-quality sequences to the phylum level, 98.00 ± 2.44% (s.d.) to the family level, 84.51 ± 13.44% (s.d.) to the genus level and 32.71 ± 27.74% (s.d.) to the species level. The results showed bacteria belonging to 48 phyla, 119 classes, 175 orders, 228 families, 278 genera and 75 species. Detailed characteristics of each sample are listed in Table 1, and all raw sequences were deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (accession number SRP063690).

Table 1. Operational taxonomic unit (OTU)-based diversity indexes in rat buccal cavity and rectum samples during decomposition.

Sample name Sample group Sample region Sample time Raw sequences Clean sequences OTUs Chao 1 Observed Species Shannon index
AM01 group A buccal cavity alive 44201 43698 179 237.83 123 2.53
AM02 group A buccal cavity 0 h 25848 23616 830 884.56 599 5.47
AM03 group A buccal cavity 4 h 58277 55573 753 517.39 308 4.08
AM04 group A buccal cavity 12 h 40267 39830 250 192.63 133 2.50
AM05 group A buccal cavity 1 d 51774 51340 161 131.09 77 1.20
AM06 group A buccal cavity 2 d 52858 52179 209 140.05 103 3.03
AM07 group A buccal cavity 3 d 39238 38500 313 256.44 167 3.48
AM08 group A buccal cavity 4 d 32886 31310 725 632.90 512 5.58
AM09 group A buccal cavity 6 d 52732 51566 258 199.56 114 2.56
AA01 group A rectum alive 43810 42253 417 464.97 323 3.81
AA02 group A rectum 0 h 38292 36672 403 399.37 346 4.60
AA03 group A rectum 4 h 36413 35332 315 278.11 247 3.21
AA04 group A rectum 12 h 31063 29971 323 271.57 248 3.78
AA05 group A rectum 1 d 44670 43274 339 338.67 250 4.02
AA06 group A rectum 2 d 61996 61368 181 131.04 104 1.44
AA07 group A rectum 3 d 38890 38473 159 149.96 121 1.75
AA08 group A rectum 4 d 15137 14982 99 148.58 99 1.52
AA09 group A rectum 6 d 31587 31347 101 119.11 74 1.62
AA10 group A rectum 8 d 59499 58837 171 155.33 127 1.70
BM01 group B buccal cavity alive 49263 48589 199 149.32 118 3.05
BM02 group B buccal cavity 0 h 54850 51060 994 827.82 522 4.98
BM03 group B buccal cavity 4 h 19412 19034 195 172.69 137 3.35
BM04 group B buccal cavity 12 h 9611 9201 393 375.38 363 4.89
BM05 group B buccal cavity 1 d 90467 89315 295 190.05 125 1.89
BM06 group B buccal cavity 2 d 43100 42579 196 181.77 109 2.18
BM07 group B buccal cavity 3 d 19340 18706 262 263.88 171 2.99
BA01 group B rectum alive 75480 71302 437 382.94 314 4.96
BA02 group B rectum 0 h 20778 19587 307 287.66 250 2.79
BA03 group B rectum 4 h 48171 45954 394 348.72 290 3.48
BA04 group B rectum 12 h 48059 45838 350 326.03 259 2.97
BA05 group B rectum 1 d 26588 25769 324 373.84 270 3.06
BA06 group B rectum 2 d 47855 47275 211 171.58 130 1.31
BA07 group B rectum 3 d 61768 60987 234 159.37 129 2.17

Bacterial diversity before and after death

The OTU number and alpha diversity metrics for buccal cavity samples rapidly increased immediately after death compared with the samples collected from live rats (Table 1). A Venn diagram was used to compare the similarities and differences between the communities in the different samples (Fig. 1). The AM01, AM02, BM01 and BM02 communities had 56 OTUs in common (Fig. 1a), with the common OTUs comprising 98.53%, 69.49%, 98.46% and 77.89% of the sequences in the AM01, AM02, BM01 and BM02 communities, respectively (Table 2). The AA01, AA02, BA01 and BA02 communities had 157 OTUs in common (Fig. 1b), with the common OTUs comprising 94.86%, 94.90%, 96.69% and 98.25% of the sequences in the AA01, AA02, BA01 and BA02 communities, respectively (Table 2).

Figure 1. Shared operational taxonomic unit (OTU) analysis of the different communities.

Figure 1

Venn diagrams showing the unique and shared OTUs in the different communities, (a) for the AM01, AM02, BM01 and BM02 communities, and (b) for the AA01, AA02, BA01 and BA02 communities. Sample names refer to samples as described in Table 1.

Table 2. Shared phyla among the buccal cavity and rectum communities from samples collected immediately before and after death (less than 10 min).

Phylum Shared OTUs Shared reads
Shared OTUs Shared reads
AM01 AM02 BM01 BM02 AA01 AA02 BA01 BA02
Actinobacteria 7 894 770 1002 988 1 8 4 2 1
Bacteroidetes 3 3 35 5 25 57 10900 9166 7793 9631
Deferribacteres 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 37 903 4
Firmicutes 24 3705 2106 3844 2272 78 2615 4531 4369 4210
Proteobacteria 21 4437 3193 4181 3530 19 578 361 1138 730
Tenericutes 1 1 18 4 33 0 0 0 0 0
Verrucomicrobia 0 0 0 0 0 1 67 122 243 112
Total shared reads 56 9040 6122 9036 6848 157 14172 14221 14448 14688
Total reads   9175 8810 9177 8792   14940 14985 14943 14950
Shared reads/Total reads (%)   98.53 69.49 98.46 77.89   94.86 94.90 96.69 98.25

OTU: operational taxonomic unit. Sample names are as defined in Table 1.

Bacterial community composition and structure succession analysis

To identify bacterial community structure succession during decomposition, the 16S rRNA sequences were classified at both the phylum and the family levels. There were notable trends and changes in the relative abundance of the different bacterial taxa in the buccal cavities and rectums of the rat corpses throughout the decomposition process (Figs 2 and 3). In the buccal cavity, Proteobacteria was the dominant phylum (71.18 ± 19.31% (s.d.) in group A and 71.83 ± 20.60% (s.d.) in group B) as decomposition progressed, except in the 4-h post-mortem sample, where Firmicutes was the dominant taxon (44.40%) in group A and Actinobacteria became dominant (42.1%) in group B. Moraxellaceae increased in abundance in both groups to become the most abundant taxon on day 1 post-mortem, but gradually decreased thereafter. The abundance of Xanthomonadaceae gradually increased as decomposition progressed, and it became the dominant taxon from day 3 post-mortem onwards. The abundance of Enterobacteriaceae dramatically increased on day 2 post-mortem, but then decreased from day 4 onwards, while the abundance of Streptococcaceae and Pasteurellaceae gradually decreased throughout decomposition. Interestingly, the abundance of Pseudomonadaceae rapidly increased on day 6 post-mortem in group A. In the rectum samples of both groups, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes were the predominant phyla until 2 days post-mortem, at which point Proteobacteria became the most abundant phylum. Similarly, Enterobacteriaceae took over from Prevotellaceae as the predominant family 2 days post-mortem.

Figure 2. Bacterial community structure variation during decomposition at the phylum level.

Figure 2

Relative abundance of bacterial phyla during decomposition in the buccal cavity in group A (a), buccal cavity in group B (b), rectum in group A (c) and rectum in group B (d). Sample names refer to samples as described in Table 1.

Figure 3. Bacterial community structure variation during decomposition at the family level.

Figure 3

Relative abundance of bacterial families during decomposition in the buccal cavity in group A (a), buccal cavity in group B (b), rectum in group A (c) and rectum in group B (d). Sample names refer to samples as described in Table 1.

There was a significant non-linear relationship between bacterial taxon richness and ADH. The non-linear model was a better fit based on the data points. Cubic is one of the non-linear forms, and it had the highest coefficient of determination (ranging from 0.308 to 0.351) compared to the other non-linear equations in non-linear form. OTU numbers, Chao1, Observed Species and Shannon index values declined prior to approximately 1600 ADH (2.5 days post-mortem), increased in the period from 1600 to 3624 ADH (6 days post-mortem) and finally decreased thereafter (Supplementary Fig. S3).

Clustering patterns of samples from the buccal cavity and rectum during decomposition

Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) revealed the decomposition pattern in two-dimensional space for the unweighted and weighted unifrac distances (Fig. 4). According to the unweighted unifrac PCoA, samples collected from the buccal cavity of live rats formed a unique cluster, separate from the other samples (Fig. 4a). According to principal coordinate 1 (PC1) and PC2 analysis (22.31% and 17.94% of variance explained, respectively), the microbial communities of the buccal cavity and rectum were separated in the early PMI and clustered in the late PMI. The separation between samples across body sites in the early PMI and similarity in the late PMI were more notable on the weighted unifrac-based plot. According to weighted unifrac PCoA, the buccal cavity samples in early PMI, the rectum samples in early PMI and the microbial communities (both buccal cavity and rectum samples) in late PMI were grouped into three distinct clusters based on PC1 and PC2 analysis (70.37% and 5.23% of variance explained, respectively; Fig. 4b). Sample AA10, a rectum sample from rats in group A, clustered separately from other rectum samples and showed a different pattern of relative abundance (This might have been caused by sampling error or poor sample quality). The hierarchical clustering by unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) was used to analyse samples according to their weighted unifrac matrix (Fig. 5). This analysis revealed similar results to the weighted unifrac PCoA. The buccal cavity and rectum samples collected in the early decomposition stage formed distinct clusters, while the samples from the two body sites collected in the late decomposition stage were more similar.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Two-dimensional principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plot of unweighted (a) and weighted (b) unifrac distance matrices for buccal cavity and rectum samples during decomposition. The bacterial community of the buccal cavity from rat carcasses in group A (red circle) and in group B (blue diamond) and the bacterial community of the rectum from rat carcasses in group A (black square) and in group B (green triangle) were represented. Sample names refer to samples as described in Table 1.

Figure 5. Hierarchical clustering of buccal cavity and rectum samples by unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) according to their weighted unifrac matrix.

Figure 5

Sample names refer to samples as described in Table 1.

Differences between samples in the insect exclusion and access groups

Differences in the community composition between groups A and B were tested using the Analysis of Similarities description (Supplementary Tables S3 and S4). Although several taxa showed significant differences between the two groups, they were present in low abundance (mostly < 0.1%). For the buccal cavity samples, the genera Escherichia, Wautersiella and Collinsella were more prevalent in group B, and Photobacterium, Facklamia, Nitrospina and Anaerotruncus only appeared in group B. Deinococcus, Methylocaldum, Spirochaeta, Halanaerobium and Acholeplasma were absent from group B. For the rectum samples, the genera Stenotrophomonas, Sutterella and Bifidobacterium were enriched in group B, while Thiobacillus, Wautersiella, Sulfurimonas and Lachnospira were absent from group A. The abundance of Anaerovibrio and Collinsella was lower in group B than in group A. Clostridium, Adlercreutzia and Caulobacter were absent from group B.

Discussion

In our study, the dominant phyla in the buccal cavity of the live rats were Proteobacteria, Firmicutes and Actinobacteria (Fig. 2), and the dominant genera were Sphingomonas and Streptococcus (Supplementary Fig. S4). The dominant rectal phyla of the live rats were Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes (Fig. 2), and the dominant genera were Prevotella and Bacteroides (Supplementary Fig. S4). These dominant phyla and genera were similar to those in the mouth and stool of healthy humans, as reported by the Human Microbiome Project (HMP)28. The HMP observed that human stool harbours a rich microbiome, while the oral cavity is more limited28. We observed the same phenomenon in samples collected from live rats (Table 1). In addition to having similar decay processes and mechanisms, the microbial communities of Sprague Dawley rats were similar to those of humans, indicating that such animals are appropriate models for human decomposition studies. Using a rat model, we were able to perform replicate experiments with a large number of samples to minimize experimental error and assess to what extent intra-individual variation in microbiota occurred during decomposition25.

More bacterial taxa were found in the buccal cavity of rats immediately after death than were present in live rats; however, there was no obvious variation pre- and immediately post-mortem in the rectum samples. Compared with the anus, the mouth is more exposed to microorganisms from external body locations (e.g. skin and hair) or the environment (e.g. soil and air). Saliva, which shows antimicrobial activity, ceases to be produced after death, contributing to increased bacterial survival. Interestingly, Sphingomonadaceae, one of the dominant families in the buccal cavity of live rats, showed a sharp decline in abundance immediately after death. Aerobic Gram-negative bacterial taxa of the family Sphingomonadaceae were usually reported to be isolated from different environments (e.g. soils, lakes and oceans). Lee et al.29 isolated several bacterial strains belonging to the genus Sphingomonas from the live mouse oral cavity as well.

Our data demonstrated that the relative abundance of dominant phyla Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria showed notable variation during the process of decomposition, which may aid in PMI estimation. In contrast to a previous report26, Proteobacteria and Moraxellaceae, the predominant phylum and family in buccal cavity samples, increased in abundance on day 1 post-mortem but slightly declined thereafter, while Firmicutes gradually decreased. The remaining dominant families (Xanthomonadaceae, Streptococcaceae, Enterobacteriaceae and Pasteurellaceae) showed changes in abundance that were consistent with the previous report26. In addition, Actinobacteria were prevalent members of the buccal cavity bacterial communities 4 h post-mortem, becoming even more abundant than Bacteriodetes in group B samples. Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, the dominant phyla in rectum samples on day 1 post-mortem, were replaced by Proteobacteria from day 2 post-mortem onwards. Similarly, the most prevalent family on day 1 post-mortem was Prevotellaceae, which was replaced by Enterobacteriaceae on day 2 post-mortem. Metcalf et al.25 also found that Enterobacteriaceae, widely recognized as opportunistic pathogens associated with sewage and animal matter, became more abundant after rupture in the decay stage25. Proteobacteria are commonly associated with the spoiling of meat, and have been found on the hides of slaughtered animals30. Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes have been reported as the two main phyla in the human gut (intestine, rectum and cecum) and in faecal samples23,28,31,32,33. Actinobacteria are widely distributed in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, especially in soil, where they play a crucial role in the recycling of refractory biomaterials through decomposition and humus formation34. We also found that Proteus and Ignatzschineria of the Gammaproteobacteria class were predominant both in the buccal cavity and the rectum in the late stages of decomposition (Supplementary Fig. S4). The Gammaproteobacteria display diverse metabolic capabilities, and are involved in the breakdown of more complex molecules21. Our results supported the theory that Gammaproteobacteria may be an important contributor to the process of decomposition.

Previous studies have shown that oral communities differ from gastrointestinal tract communities in healthy people and human cadavers in the bloat stage of decomposition24,28. However, in this study, we observed a separation of samples from the buccal cavity and rectum in the early PMI, whereas samples from the two body sites clustered together in the late PMI. Pechal et al.26 monitored swine decomposition under natural conditions and confirmed a significant negative linear relationship over time for overall phylum and family taxon richness. We also found a significant fluctuating non-linear relationship (with a general trend of descent) for overall bacterial taxon richness over the course of decomposition. Tuomisto et al.35 observed that the amount of bacterial DNA remained quite stable with time elapsed post-mortem, except for a substantial increase on day 5 post-mortem, during autopsies of rectum from male human. Those results indicated that the number of bacteria increased while the richness declined during the decomposition process. A shift from aerobic (Streptococcus) to anaerobic (Proteus and Ignatzschineria) bacteria was also observed in the bacterial communities, which was similar to previous studies24,26.

We noted an appreciable number of unclassified reads at the genus level in both the buccal cavity and rectum samples during the early PMI, and in the buccal cavity samples from rats decomposed in the absence of insects since the active decay stage. Previous study26 has produced very few unclassified reads from samples collected 1–3 days after death (Supplementary Fig. S5). Previous studies also concluded that approximately 80% of bacteria identified by metagenomic sequencing were noncultivable23. Although a limited number of unclassified sequences can result from PCR errors or sequencing artefacts, such an abundance of unclassified reads suggests a significant presence of novel bacterial taxa36. Potential novel species are assumed when there is a significant difference between the phenotypic characteristics and/or 16S rRNA sequences (more than 0.5% difference) of the unknown bacterium and those of the most closely related ones37,38. Many factors can influence the bacterial communities detected in and on a cadaver, including the individual’s starting microbiome, the decomposition environment of the cadaver, sample collection methodology and even differences in swab pressure during sample collection. Compared with previous studies, we sampled more time points on the first day post-mortem, and identified fluctuations in microbial abundance over time (especially in the Actinobacteria and Micrococcaceae). To establish the bacterial succession patterns during decomposition, and assess the potential of this information for application as a forensic tool, further study is required to test more time points and compile a larger database of necrobiome communities.

In the current study, the cadavers in the sarcosaphagous insect exclusion group (group A) took longer to decompose than those in the insect access group (group B). However, the arrival and oviposition of sarcosaphagous insects had no obvious influence on bacterial taxa during decomposition. Although there were some significant differences in the abundance of specific taxa between the sarcosaphagous insect access and exclusion groups, the abundance of these taxa was low and could generally be ignored. Symbiotic insects may benefit from the microbes already resident in the carcass, while competitors would be introduced from newly arrived insects and microbes. Other microorganisms transported to a carcass or corpse via flies could affect taxon richness through decomposition processes such as competition26. Blowflies may directly affect microbial species by initiating immune responses after pathogen detection39,40, and producing secretions with antibiotic properties41,42. Furthermore, fly larvae can obtain amino acids from a variety of bacteria. A previous study illustrated that bacteria or their metabolic products are essential nutrients for house fly maggot growth, and a wide variety of bacteria can contribute to the suitability of an organic substrate for maggot growth43. Additionally, carrion microbial communities influence the arrival patterns and behaviour, such as oviposition, of sarcosaphagous insects through the production of metabolically derived volatile organic compounds44,45,46. The interactions between insects and microbial communities are still poorly understood in carrion decomposition systems.

Decomposition rates depend on the extent of internal and external environmental interactions. Because of the predictable succession of corpse-colonizing sarcosaphagous arthropods and their specific life stages, insects are regularly used as important indicators of PMI in terrestrial environments, especially in corpses displaying advanced decay47. However, insects may arrive at a carcass several hours to several days after death, which might lead to imprecise estimates of PMI. In addition, insect activity can be inhibited by rain and low temperatures, and can be absent from some decomposing remains48. Therefore, microbial communities might offer an additional biometric for PMI estimation, as the succession of microbial community structures is a continuous process rather than a series of separate processes47. Several studies also confirmed that bacterial communities can be used as a microbial clock for assisting in estimates of PMI25,26. The current study supports these previous findings and provides additional data. Our study also demonstrated that the abundance of dominant taxa was not significantly altered by the presence or absence of sarcosaphagous insects, meaning that microbial community structure could be applied as an indicator of PMI in various situations. Additionally, knowing how the bacterial community structure changes in response to insect arrival and colonization patterns of carrion might modify the accuracy of PMI estimation by sarcosaphagous arthropods. However, there are a variety of challenges for researchers studying microbial communities during decomposition. High-throughput sequencing is too expensive for routine analysis and other forensic techniques have required considerable testing and refinement long after they were initially conceived49. Therefore, whilst forensic microbiology offers enormous potential to be developed into a standard and widely accepted forensic tool for PMI estimation, there is a need for a great deal of basic research before this can be realized.

Methods

Study sites and sample grouping

To study the bacterial community during decomposition, we used adult female Sprague Dawley rat carcasses (n = 18) as models of human decomposition. The experiments were conducted in Changsha City, Hunan Province, central south China (28.12°N, 112.58°E) in June 2014. The rats, each weighting 200–220 g, were randomly divided into two groups and killed by blunt force causing spinal cord transection. Each carcass was individually placed into a sterile cardboard box (0.5 × 0.3 × 0.25 m) lined with a thick layer of sterile sawdust to absorb the subsequent putrefactive liquid without surrounding contamination. In the sarcosaphagous insect access group (group B), the boxes were left open to allow insect access. In the sarcosaphagous insect exclusion group (group A), each box was placed in a fine mesh grenadine bag (60 mesh/inch) to allow normal air circulation but exclude insects. At approximately 1300 GMT on 1 June, 2014, the boxes containing carcasses were randomly placed at least 5 m apart on the ground in an area dominated by herbaceous plants and cherry trees. We observed physical changes in the carcasses each day, and recorded the number, species and distribution of insects in the sarcosaphagous insect access group. The eggs, larvae and adult insects were collected three times per day (0700, 1300 and 1900 GMT), and some of the immature insects were raised to adulthood for morphological taxonomic identification, and for sequencing of a fragment of the cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene region, as described previously16. WTH0T1-3-0.5 intelligent temperature and humidity loggers (Wangyunshan Information Technology Co., Fuzhou, China) were placed within 0.6 m of each carcass, approximately 0.3 m above the ground. Ambient air temperature and humidity were monitored hourly during the course of the experiments. The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital Central South University (approval code: 201303147), and the methods were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines.

Bacterial community sample collection

Bacterial communities were sampled prior to death (less than 1 min before killing), immediately after death (less than 10 min post-mortem), and then at 4 h, 12 h, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, 4 days, 6 days and 8 days post-mortem (sample names are provided in Table 1). Two body sites, the buccal cavity and rectum, were swabbed lightly for 60 s using sterile cotton applicators premoistened with sterile ultrapure water. Once the corpses reached the stage of advanced decay, the buccal cavity and rectum were no longer discernible in animals from group B, and sampling ended after day 3 post-mortem. For group A, buccal cavity sampling was no longer possible after 6 days post-mortem, meaning that only the rectum was sampled at the 8-day time point. After sampling, the tip of the applicator was cut off and placed in a 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tube containing 1 mL sterile ultrapure water. All samples were immediately frozen at −20 °C until further processing (within 24 h).

DNA extraction, PCR amplification and next-generation sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted using a MoBio PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (Mo Bio Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s specifications. DNA concentration and purity were checked on 1% agarose gels, and DNA was diluted to a 1 ng/μL working stock. DNA samples from the nine rat carcasses in each group at each time point were mixed in equal concentrations, and the mixed DNA specimens were sent to Novogene Biological Information Technology Co. (Beijing, China) for analysis by MiSeq sequencing.

PCR reactions were conducted using the 515F/806R primer set50, which amplifies the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene (forward primer: 5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′, reverse primer: 5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′). The reverse primer contained a 6-bp error-correcting barcode unique to each sample. All PCR reactions were carried out in 30-μL reaction volumes containing 15 μL of Phusion High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), 0.2 μM forward and reverse primers, and 10 ng template DNA. Thermal cycling conditions were: 98 °C for 1 min, followed by 30 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 50 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. Resulting amplicons were confirmed on 2% agarose gels containing ethidium bromide.

All amplicons were in the size range of 400–450 bp, and were purified using a GeneJET Gel Extraction Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Following quantitation, equal concentrations of the purified amplicons were combined into a single tube. Sequencing libraries were generated using a NEB Next Ultra DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) following manufacturer’s recommendations, and index codes were added. The library quality was assessed on a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system. Sequencing was conducted on an Illumina MiSeq platform, which generated 300-bp paired-end reads.

Data analysis

Paired-end reads from the original DNA fragments were merged using FLASH version 1.2.751. After merging, sequences were processed and analysed using QIIME version 1.7.052. Sequences containing ambiguous bases (N) or low-quality bases were filtered out using QIIME filter53, and chimeras were removed using UCHIME54. Remaining sequences were assigned to each sample according to the unique barcodes, and the sequences were rarefied prior to statistical analyses at the level of 9200.

Clustering was performed using the UPARSE pipeline (version 7.0.1001)27, and similar sequences were assigned to OTUs using the threshold of 97% identity. A representative sequence was picked from each OTU by selecting the longest sequence that had the largest number of hits to other sequences in the OTU. The RDP classifier (version 2.2)55 was used to annotate taxonomic information for each representative sequence. The representative sequences were aligned using the Greengenes database56, with a minimum identity of 80%. The phylogenetic relationships of representative sequences were determined using PyNAST software (Version 1.2)57, and the GreenGenes database “Core Set” data58 was used for rapid multiple sequence alignment. “Rare taxa” was used to describe the taxa with a relative abundance of less than 1% of the total abundance of all taxa in all samples, while the unclassified reads were grouped into “Others”.

Non-linear regression between bacterial taxon richness (OTU numbers, Chao1, Observed Species and Shannon index values) and ADH was performed using PASW Statistical Software version 18 (SPSS Ltd, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong). ADHs were a summation of temperature (°C) above the lower development threshold multiplied by hours15. Because ADH was used to explore how bacterial communities (not insects) changed in the current study, a lower development threshold of 0 °C was employed in this calculation26.

Alpha diversity was estimated using three phylogenetic diversity metrics: Chao1, Observed Species and Shannon index. Rarefaction curves were generated based on Observed Species. Beta diversity between bacterial communities was evaluated using both weighted and unweighted unifrac distances59. Hierarchical clustering of samples was completed using UPGMA. PCoA on the unifrac distances of the unweighted and weighted distance matrices was performed to visualise differences in bacterial community composition and structure, respectively. Analysis of similarities description60 was performed based on the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity distance matrices to test the differences in community composition among groups of samples.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Guo, J. et al. Potential use of bacterial community succession for estimating post-mortem interval as revealed by high-throughput sequencing. Sci. Rep. 6, 24197; doi: 10.1038/srep24197 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep24197-s1.pdf (2MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81373249, 81302615 and 81571855), the the Science and Technology Committee of Shanghai Municipality (KF1203), the Graduate Student Education Innovation Projects of Central South University (160020009) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University (2015zzts276). The authors are grateful for the technical support provided by Novogene Biological Information Technology Co., Ltd (Beijing, China). English language editing was provided by Edanz Group Ltd (Beijing, China).

Footnotes

Author Contributions J.J.G. and Y.J.D. wrote the main manuscript text and prepared all figures. J.F.C. oversaw the project and assisted with the writing of the manuscript. L.Z., Y.D.G., J.Y. and Y.F.C. designed the experiments and participated in writing the manuscript. J.J.G., X.L.F., H.D.L., Z.Y.H. and L.L.L performed the experiments. W.T.Y. made the statistic analysis. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

References

  1. Vass A. A. Beyond the grave – understanding human decomposition. Microbiol. Today 28, 190–192 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  2. Wolff M., Uribe A., Ortiz A. & Duque P. A preliminary study of forensic entomology in Medellin, Colombia. Forensic Sci. Int. 120, 53–59 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Zapico S. C., Menendez S. T. & Nunez P. Cell death proteins as markers of early postmortem interval. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 71, 2957–2962 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Elmas I., Baslo B., Ertas M. & Kaya M. Analysis of gastrocnemius compound muscle action potential in rat after death: significance for the estimation of early postmortem interval. Forensic Sci. Int. 116, 125–132 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Elmas I., Baslo M. B., Ertas M. & Kaya M. Compound muscle action potential analysis in different death models: significance for the estimation of early postmortem interval. Forensic Sci. Int. 127, 75–81 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Damann F. E., Williams D. E. & Layton A. C. Potential use of bacterial community succession in decaying human bone for estimating postmortem interval. J. Forensic Sci. 60, 844–850 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Putman R. J. Patterns of carbon dioxide evolution from decaying carrion: decomposition of small mammal carrion in temperate systems 1. Oikos 31, 47–57 (1978). [Google Scholar]
  8. Fan A. Y. In Forensic Medcine 6th edn, (eds Wang B. J. et al.) 17–21 (People’s Medical Publishing House, 2014). [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaatsch H. J., Stadler M. & Nietert M. Photometric measurement of color changes in livor mortis as a function of pressure and time. Development of a computer-aided system for measuring pressure-induced blanching of livor mortis to estimate time of death. Int. J. Legal Med. 106, 91–97 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wyler D., Marty W. & Bar W. Correlation between the post-mortem cell content of cerebrospinal fluid and time of death. Int. J. Legal Med. 106, 194–199 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mikami H. et al. Estimation of time of death by quantification of melatonin in corpses. Int. J. Legal Med. 107, 42–51 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Poloz Y. O. & O’Day D. H. Determining time of death: temperature-dependent postmortem changes in calcineurin A, MARCKS, CaMKII, and protein phosphatase 2A in mouse. Int. J. Legal Med. 123, 305–314 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sampaio-Silva F., Magalhaes T., Carvalho F., Dinis-Oliveira R. J. & Silvestre R. Profiling of RNA degradation for estimation of post morterm interval. PLoS One 8, e56507 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hansen J., Lesnikova I., Funder A. M. & Banner J. DNA and RNA analysis of blood and muscle from bodies with variable postmortem intervals. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 10, 322–328 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Amendt J. et al. Best practice in forensic entomology-standards and guidelines. Int. J. Legal Med. 121, 90–104 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Guo Y. D. et al. Identification of forensically important sarcophagid flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) in China, based on COI and 16S rDNA gene sequences. J. Forensic Sci. 56, 1534–1540 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tomberlin J. K., Mohr R., Benbow M. E., Tarone A. M. & VanLaerhoven S. A roadmap for bridging basic and applied research in forensic entomology. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 56, 401–421 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Amendt J., Krettek R. & Zehner R. Forensic entomology. Naturwissenschaften 91, 51–65 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Melvin J. R., Cronholm L. S., Simson L. R. & Isaacs A. M. Bacterial transmigration as an indicator of time of death. J. Forensic Sci. 29, 412–417 (1984). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kimura A., Ishida Y., Hayashi T., Nosaka M. & Kondo T. Estimating time of death based on the biological clock. Int. J. Legal Med. 125, 385–391 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dickson G. C., Poulter R. T., Maas E. W., Probert P. K. & Kieser J. A. Marine bacterial succession as a potential indicator of postmortem submersion interval. Forensic Sci. Int. 209, 1–10 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Amann R. I., Ludwig W. & Schleifer K. H. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol. Rev. 59, 143–169 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Eckburg P. B. et al. Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science 308, 1635–1638 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hyde E. R., Haarmann D. P., Lynne A. M., Bucheli S. R. & Petrosino J. F. The living dead: bacterial community structure of a cadaver at the onset and end of the bloat stage of decomposition. PLoS One 8, e77733 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Metcalf J. L. et al. A microbial clock provides an accurate estimate of the postmortem interval in a mouse model system. Elife 2, e01104 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pechal J. L. et al. The potential use of bacterial community succession in forensics as described by high throughput metagenomic sequencing. Int. J. Legal Med. 128, 193–205 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Edgar R. C. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods. 10, 996–998 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. The Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207–214 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lee B., Bowden G. H. & Myal Y. Identification of mouse submaxillary gland protein in mouse saliva and its binding to mouse oral bacteria. Arch. Oral. Biol. 47, 327–332 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gill C. O. & Newton K. G. The ecology of bacterial spoilage of fresh meat at chill temperatures. Meat Sci. 2, 207–217 (1978). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Backhed F., Ley R. E., Sonnenburg J. L., Peterson D. A. & Gordon J. I. Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine. Science 307, 1915–1920 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Turnbaugh P. J. et al. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 444, 1027–1031 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Li M. et al. Symbiotic gut microbes modulate human metabolic phenotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2117–2122 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ventura M. et al. Genomics of Actinobacteria: tracing the evolutionary history of an ancient phylum. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 71, 495–548 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tuomisto S., Karhunen P. J. & Pessi T. Time-dependent post mortem changes in the composition of intestinal bacteria using real-time quantitative PCR. Gut Pathog. 5, 35 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Dong Q. et al. Diversity of bacteria at healthy human conjunctiva. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 5408–5413 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Palys T., Nakamura L. K. & Cohan F. M. Discovery and classification of ecological diversity in the bacterial world: the role of DNA sequence data. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 47, 1145–1156 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Woo P. C., Lau S. K., Teng J. L., Tse H. & Yuen K. Y. Then and now: use of 16S rDNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification and discovery of novel bacteria in clinical microbiology laboratories. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 14, 908–934 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ferrandon D., Imler J. L., Hetru C. & Hoffmann J. A. The Drosophila systemic immune response: sensing and signalling during bacterial and fungal infections. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 7, 862–874 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Gottar M. et al. The Drosophila immune response against Gram-negative bacteria is mediated by a peptidoglycan recognition protein. Nature 416, 640–644 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rozen D. E., Engelmoer D. J. & Smiseth P. T. Antimicrobial strategies in burying beetles breeding on carrion, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17890–17895 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kerridge A., Lappin-Scott H. & Stevens J. R. Antibacterial properties of larval secretions of the blowfly, Lucilia sericata. Med. Vet. Entomol. 19, 333–337 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Schmidtmann E. T. & Martin P. A. Relationship between selected bacteria and the growth of immature house flies, Musca domestica, in an axenic test system. J. Med. Entomol. 29, 232–235 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Stensmyr M. C. et al. Pollination: Rotting smell of dead-horse arum florets. Nature 420, 625–626 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Paczkowski S., Maibaum F., Paczkowska M. & Schutz S. Decaying mouse volatiles perceived by Calliphora vicina Rob.-Desv. J. Forensic Sci. 57, 1497–1506 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Dekeirsschieter J. et al. Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of Thanatophilus sinuatus Fabricius (Coleoptera: Silphidae) to selected cadaveric volatile organic compounds. J. Forensic Sci. 58, 917–923 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Finley S. J., Benbow M. E. & Javan G. T. Microbial communities associated with human decomposition and their potential use as postmortem clocks. Int. J. Legal Med. 129, 623–632 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Campobasso C. P., Di Vella G. & Introna F. Factors affecting decomposition and Diptera colonization. Forensic Sci. Int. 120, 18–27 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Fierer N. et al. Forensic identification using skin bacterial communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 6477–6481 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Caporaso J. G. et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 6, 1621–1624 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Magoc T. & Salzberg S. L. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27, 2957–2963 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Caporaso J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods. 7, 335–336 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Bokulich N. A. et al. Quality-filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from Illumina amplicon sequencing. Nat. Methods. 10, 57–59 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Edgar R. C., Haas B. J., Clemente J. C., Quince C. & Knight R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27, 2194–2200 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wang Q., Garrity G. M., Tiedje J. M. & Cole J. R. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 5261–5267 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. DeSantis T. Z. et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 5069–5072 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Caporaso J. G. et al. PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment. Bioinformatics 26, 266–267 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. DeSantis T. Z. et al. NAST: a multiple sequence alignment server for comparative analysis of 16S rRNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W394–W399 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Lozupone C. & Knight R. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 8228–8235 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Clarke K. R. Non-parametric multivariate analysis of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol. 18, 117–143 (1993). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep24197-s1.pdf (2MB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES