Abstract
Animals have evolved many ways to enhance their own reproductive success. One bizarre sexual ritual is the “love” dart shooting of helicid snails, which has courted many theories regarding its precise function. Acting as a hypodermic needle, the dart transfers an allohormone that increases paternity success. Its precise physiological mechanism of action within the recipient snail is to close off the entrance to the sperm digestion organ via a contraction of the copulatory canal, thereby delaying the digestion of most donated sperm. In this study, we used the common garden snail Cornu aspersum to identify the allohormone that is responsible for this physiological change in the female system of this simultaneous hermaphrodite. The love dart allohormone (LDA) was isolated from extracts derived from mucous glands that coat the dart before it is stabbed through the partner's body wall. We isolated LDA from extracts using bioassay-guided contractility measurement of the copulatory canal. LDA is encoded within a 235-amino acid precursor protein containing multiple cleavage sites that, when cleaved, releases multiple bioactive peptides. Synthetic LDA also stimulated copulatory canal contractility. Combined with our finding that the protein amino acid sequence resembles previously described molluscan buccalin precursors, this indicates that LDA is partially conserved in helicid snails and less in other molluscan species. In summary, our study provides the full identification of an allohormone that is hypodermically injected via a love dart. More importantly, our findings have important consequences for understanding reproductive biology and the evolution of alternative reproductive strategies.
Keywords: invertebrate, molecular biology, neuropeptide, peptide hormone, pheromone, proteomics
Introduction
In animal species with separate sexes, mate choice and precopulatorily sexual selection of females are influenced by their reproductive physiology and behavior (1), whereas competition between males to generate offspring is generally associated with morphological and physical characteristics (1–3). However, such competition for fertilization can continue after copulation, at the level of the sperm, and this process seems to have become an especially important evolutionary driving force among a group of species with a different reproductive strategy: simultaneous hermaphrodites that do not self-fertilize (4–6).
Helicid land snail copulation lasts 2–6 h and includes the unique use of calcareous (calcium carbonate) “love” darts that are pierced through the body wall of the mating partner during courtship (7–10). The mating strategy often requires a precopulatory courtship with associated behaviors. In the snail Cornu aspersum (formerly known as Cantareus aspersus and Helix aspersa), there are three major components, described as introductory behavior (reciprocal tactile and oral contacts), calcareous love dart shooting, and copulation (11). Meanwhile, the mating behaviors for the snail Helix pomatia appear to be quite different and require elaborate caressing with the tentacles and oral lappets accompanied by intertwining and body contractions (12). However, this is still followed by the injection of a calcareous love dart and copulation.
Research has implicated the mucus that coats these calcareous love darts as containing compounds that enhance paternity success; thus the love dart is used as a tool for increasing fertilization success of the shooter (10, 13–16). Love darts are characteristic features of the reproductive tract for the hermaphrodite land snail families of Helicidae and Ariophantidae (12). These darts are assembled within a thick-walled dart sac and have now been described in numerous species, showing distinct species-specific structural architecture (17). A mucous gland is in close proximity to the dart sac, so that darts can be coated with mucus prior to release. The exact function of the mucus-covered dart remained a mystery for many years, although several explanations had been suggested. One such explanation that gained prominence was that the love dart existed as a nuptial gift of calcium for the mating partner, to be used for egg production (4, 14). This was later disproved, because the amount of calcium in one dart is roughly equal to that of one egg, and thus it would not contribute significantly to an average clutch of 59 eggs (for C. aspersum) (18).
More recent research has provided better insight, showing that when a mucus-covered dart is successfully stabbed into the partner, there is a corresponding increase in paternity success (13). Without mating with a mucus-covered dart, the spermatophore placed into the spermatophore-receiving organ of their partner is almost entirely digested, leaving only a small number (0.1%) of the spermatozoa to survive and escape to the more advanced regions of the female reproductive system for storage until fertilization occurs (19). The physiological mechanism of action seems to be through reconfiguration of the spermatophore-receiving organ copulatory canal via peristaltic movements, which in turn increases the number of escaping spermatozoa (13). Because the love darts alone do not increase paternity success, the mucus is implicated as a carrier of the active substance(s) (10).
Dart shooting probably evolved as the result of sperm competition, so that snails can optimize their reproductive success. Thus despite arguments against it, sexual selection does play an important role in hermaphrodite evolution through sexually antagonistic selection: darting benefits male function by increasing paternity (17). The active agent in the gland mucus fulfills the requirements for the substance to be classified as an allohormone; it enters the circulatory system of the conspecific via inoculation by the dart and stimulates physiological and behavioral changes (20). In this study, we analyzed the contents of the mucous glands of C. aspersum and isolated the love dart allohormone (LDA)2 that stimulates contraction of the copulatory canal. We further confirm the bioactivity using a synthetic LDA. We show that the LDA precursor is found in abundance within the mucous glands of C. aspersum, as well as another helicid, Theba pisana.
Experimental Procedures
Snails
All use of animals for this research was carried out in accordance with the recommendations set by the Animal Ethics Committee, University of the Sunshine Coast. Adult garden snails (C. aspersum) were purchased from commercial culturists (Glasshouse Gourmet Snails), transported, and stored at University of the Sunshine Coast helicid facilities during the months of April and May in 2013 and 2014. T. pisana were obtained from Warooka, South Australia, and the grains belt of South Yorke Peninsula, South Australia, and transported to the University of the Sunshine Coast helicid facilities. All snails were housed in moist nylon mesh-covered pens on a 12-h light/dark photoperiod and fed alternating days with slices of cucumber or carrot until used for bioassay.
In Vitro Assay 1: Crude Mucus Extracts
The contractile activity of the C. aspersum copulatory canal (intersecting T-junction of the bursa tract and bursa tract diverticulum as described by Koene and Chase (13) (see Fig. 1) was monitored after exposure to C. aspersum crude mucous gland preparations (extracts taken from 28 mucous glands; mucus proteins separated under 3 kDa; mucus proteins above 3 kDa), 10 μm 5-HT (positive control), or 10 μm BSA using a isometric force transducer (i-FOT Rev 3.0; GlobalTown Microtech, Sarasota, FL) linked to a compact unichannel bridge amplifier (BRAM-4B; GlobalTown) and a polygraph monitoring system (PowerLabsTM connected to Chart 5; ADI Instruments). The addition of treatments was randomized to avoid any order effects of testing (i.e. added effects, false contractions, and instances of tissue tiredness) and delivered approximately every 90 s to the copulatory canal suspended between the transducer and a fixed 0.1-mm hook using nylon ligatures, in 20-μl aliquots to a 15-ml organ bath containing oxygenated (95% O2, 5% CO2), filtered, molluscan Ringer solution (21) at 25 °C. The effects of each test substance were examined for the height of contraction amplitude and duration. In all assays, statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. In all assays, the p value can be deemed at the p = 0.05 level or lower.
RP-HPLC of <3-kDa Extracts and Preparation for in Vitro Assay
Paired mucous glands were removed from 14 specimens of C. aspersum and placed into separate glass convex dishes containing 1 ml of chilled MilliQ water treated with 0.1% TFA. From the pools of mucous glands, their tips were cut with a scalpel blade and with fine forceps, milked by dragging the forceps over the length of the mucous glands. Released mucous was then collected and dispensed into a 15-ml Falcon tube and washed in 10 ml of 0.1% TFA. Soluble compounds were then extracted through sonication. The mucous extracts were then centrifuged at 7,500 × g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was acidified with 0.1% TFA. Following this, the supernatant was passed through a C18 Sep-Pack Vac cartridge (5 g; Waters, Rydalmere, Australia) pretreated with 5 ml of 100% CH3CN, followed by 10 ml of MilliQ water treated with 0.1% TFA. The biomolecules were then eluted with 60% CH3CN, 0.1% TFA. Prior to RP-HPLC, samples were lyophilized and then resuspended in 1 ml of single-distilled H2O. If required to separate out proteins based on molecular weight, the semipurified mucous was then passed through a 2-ml Ultracel (Amicon Ultra; Merck) on a swing bucket centrifuge at 4,000 × g. Separated proteins under 3 kDa were lyophilized for RP-HPLC, whereas all proteins over 3 kDa were further purified via C18 Sep-Pack cartridges and prepared for RP-HPLC as above. All samples aside from proteins over 3 kDa were run through RP-HPLC on a PerkinElmer Life Sciences series 200 pump/autosampler, Flexar photodiode array detector, and Chromera v3.2 software, using an Agilent Zorbax 300 SB-C18 column (internal diameter 4.8 mm × 150 mm and particle size of 5 μm) for 40 min with a linear gradient of 0–60% CH3CN containing 0.1% TFA. Extracts that were not separated into <3 kDa and >3 kDa prior to RP-HPLC were collected every min for 5 min as pooled fractions and detected at wavelengths of 210 and 280 nm. This process was also repeated to collect 1-min individual fractions. In both occasions, fractions (pooled or individual) were then lyophilized and resuspended in 80 μl of single-distilled H2O for use in bioassay. Half of the sample was then used for in vitro assays (see below), and the other half was acidified with 0.1% TFA and desalted using ziptips (Waters) prior to proteome and MALDI-TOF analysis. Mucus extracts of <3-kDa fractions were collected every min and processed the same way.
In Vitro Assay 2: Pooled RP-HPLC Fractions and Individual Fractions 21–25
The contractile activity of the C. aspersum copulatory canal was monitored using conditions as described above (in vitro assay of crude mucus extracts). In assay 2a, lyophilized pooled mucous gland fractions (i.e. fractions 1–5, fractions 6–10, etc.) corresponding to 5-min intervals were delivered in 20-μl aliquots every 90 s to the copulatory canal (suspended between the transducer and a fixed 0.1-mm hook using nylon ligatures) held in a 15-ml organ bath containing oxygenated (95% O2, 5% CO2), filtered, molluscan Ringer at 25 °C. The effects of each fraction were examined for the height of contraction amplitude and duration. In assay 2b, after identifying the positive pooled mucus fraction set (viz., pooled fractions 21–25), fractions 21–25 were then separated via RP-HPLC (using the preparative conditions described above) with fractions collected in 1-min aliquots. Individual fractions were lyophilized and resuspended in 80 μl of single-distilled H2O and delivered in 20-μl aliquots to test their effects on the contractile activity of the C. aspersum copulatory canal using the same testing conditions and parameters as described in in vitro assay 2a. In both assays, Ringer and 10 μm BSA was used as negative controls, and 10 μm 5-HT was used as a positive control.
RP-HPLC of Fraction 21
Mucous glands of C. aspersum (n = 32) were placed into separate convex glass dishes containing 1 ml of chilled MilliQ water treated with 0.1% TFA. From the pools of mucous glands, their tips were then cut with a scalpel blade and fine forceps and milked. Released mucus was then collected and dispensed in to a 15-ml Falcon tube and made up to 10 ml in 0.1% TFA. Soluble compounds were then extracted through sonication. The mucous extracts were centrifuged at 7,500 × g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the acidified supernatant was collected and passed through a C18 Sep-Pack Vac cartridge (5 g; Waters) pretreated with 5 ml of 100% CH3CN, followed by 10 ml of MilliQ water treated with 0.1% TFA. Biomolecules were then eluted with 60% CH3CN, 0.1% TFA. The sample was lyophilized and resuspended in 1 ml of single-distilled H2O. Following the parameters set above, the sample was run on RP-HPLC using an Agilent Zorbax 300 SB-C18 column (internal diameter, 4.8 mm × 150 mm and particle size of 5 μm) with the same linear gradient. When sampling reached the start of fraction 21, the eluate was collected every 4 drops (71.43 μl/every 4.3 s) for a total of 14 individual fractionated eluates.
In Vitro Assay 3: Fractionation of Fraction 21
Separated fractions obtained from RP-HPLC were then assessed for their effects on the contractile activity of the C. aspersum copulatory canal. Using the same monitoring conditions as set out in in vitro assays 1 and 2, lyophilized fractions (i.e. fraction 21-1, fraction 21-2, etc.) were delivered every 90 s to the copulatory canal (suspended between the transducer and a fixed 0.1-mm hook using nylon ligatures) in 20-μl aliquots to a 15-ml organ bath containing oxygenated (95% O2, 5% CO2), filtered, molluscan Ringer at 25 °C. The effects of each fraction were examined for height of contraction amplitude and duration. Those fractions that induced contractility at 100% (n = 3) were considered positive. The same controls were tested as per in vitro assays 1 and 2.
Illumina cDNA Library Preparation and Bioinformatics
Approximately 12 mucous glands were removed from 6 C. aspersum that had been fed over a 3-day period. The mucous glands were then pooled washed in Millipore water, homogenized in TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen), and processed following the manufacturer's protocols. The RNA pellets were concentrated using 8 m LiCl RNA followed by a wash with 70% ice-cold ethanol. Purified total RNA was then dissolved with 50 μl of warmed RNase-free water and combined. The quantity and quality of pooled RNA was assessed using UV spectrophotometry (NanoDrop ND-1000). Approximately 2 μg of total RNA was then used for transcriptome analysis using the Illumina sequencing platform following generation of a cDNA library (BGI, Shenzhen, China). Prior to transcriptome assembly and mapping, filters were implemented to remove low quality reads and adaptor sequence.
To predict gene function and identify putative conserved protein domains to the contig set, we compared translated protein sequences deduced from our contigs to multiple functional domain databases using RPS-BLAST and Blast2GO. First, the entire transcribed sets were compared with the SMART, COG conserved domains database, Protein Family database (Pfam), and CDD databases using RPS-BLAST with no expect value threshold cutoff, but only matches with an expect value less than 1 × 10−10 were considered in further analyses. We also mapped our contigs for gene ontology searching the gene ontology database and Blast2GO platform. A conservative set of contigs was obtained using the bioinformatics suite above, and contigs were run through a six-frame ORF filtering criteria (ExPASy-Translate tool and NCBI ORF finder) to provide a C. aspersum mucous gland protein database.
Peptidome Analysis and Mass Spectrometry-MALDI
MALDI-MS of mucous proteins under 3 kDa were obtained using a 4700 MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems) with a mass range from m/z 500 to 3000. This TOF/TOF instrument was equipped with an Nd:YAG laser with 355-nm wavelength of <500-ps pulse and a 200-Hz firing rate. Samples were dissolved in 60% acetonitrile (CH3CN), 0.1%TFA, and 0.4 μl were placed onto a MALDI-MS sample plate containing 0.4 μl of matrix solution 2-cyano-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)acrylic acid, made from mass standards kit from AB Sciex, or sinnapinic acid (3-(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-enoic acid). After drying at ambient temperature, the sample plate was blown by nitrogen to remove any dust or fibers off the target and then analyzed immediately. MALDI-TOF/TOF data were acquired in the batch mode, and the S/N filter was set at 3. The instrument was calibrated using a standard from the mass standards kit. Final spectra resulted from an accumulation of 2000 shots and were processed by 4000 Series Explorer version 3.5.3 (AB Sciex) without smoothing; baseline subtraction was performed with peak width set to 50.
LC-MS/MS
Tryptic peptides were analyzed by LC-MS/MS on a Shimadzu Prominence Nano HPLC (Japan) system coupled to a Triple TOFTM 5600 mass spectrometer (AB Sciex) equipped with a nano electrospray ion source. A 6-μl aliquot of each extract was injected onto a 50-mm × 300-μm C18 trap column (Agilent Technologies). Tryptic digests from each fraction were desalted on the trap column for 5 min using acidified 0.1% (v/v) formic acid (aqueous) at 30 μl min−1. The trap column was then placed in line with the analytical nano HPLC column, a 150-mm × 75-μm 300SBC18, 3.5 μm (Agilent Technologies) for mass spectrometry analysis. A linear gradient at a flow rate of 300 nl min−1, from 1–40% solvent B over 35 min, followed by a steeper gradient from 40% to 80% solvent B in 5 min were utilized for peptide elution. Solvent B was held at 80% for 5 min for washing the column and returned to 1% solvent B for equilibration prior to the next sample injection. Solvent A was 0.1% (v/v) formic acid (aqueous), and solvent B consisted of 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in 90% (v/v) acetonitrile. The ion spray voltage was set to 2400 V, declustering potential was 100 V, the curtain gas flow was 25, nebulizer gas 1 was 12, and the heated interface was at 150 °C. The mass spectrometer acquired 500-ms full scan TOF-MS data followed by 20 × 50-ms full scan product ion data in an information-dependent acquisition mode. Full scan TOF-MS data were acquired over the mass range of 350–1800 and for product ion ms/ms 100–1800. Ions observed in the TOF-MS scan exceeding a threshold of 100 counts and a charge state of +2 to +5 were set to trigger the acquisition of product ion, ms/ms spectra of the resultant 20 most intense ions. The data were acquired and processed using Analyst TF1.5.1 software (AB Sciex). Spectra were deisotoped, and peaks with a local signal to noise ratio greater than 5 were picked and searched by local Mascot v. 2.1 (Matrix Science, Boston, MA) against a database of protein sequences derived from the C. aspersum protein database. The database was composed to represent a search criterion that identified conservation of active peptides.
Search parameters were as follows: trypsin digestion, fixative modification including carbamidomethylation, and variable modifications including amidation, methionine oxidation, conversion of glutamine to pyroglutamic acid, and deamidation of asparagine. Precursor mass error tolerance was set to 20 ppm, and fragment ion mass error tolerance was set to 0.1 Da. The maximum expectation value for accepting individual peptide ion scores [−10*Log(p)] was set to ≤0.01, where p is the probability that the observed match is a random event.
In Vitro Assay 4: Synthetic Peptides
A peptide corresponding to SEEDGFKYDDIDDVEAESENDRHVD of was selected based on MS analysis data of bioactive fractions. This peptide was synthesized by ChinaPeptides (Shenzhen, China), purified to 95% purity, and verified by RP-HPLC and LC-MS. The conditions under which the peptide was assayed followed those described in in vitro assays 1–3. Synthetic LDA was applied at 10 μm peptide/dose (final concentration, 0.2 μm).
LDA Comparative Amino Acid Sequence Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis
To identify the LDA gene sequence, we searched the mollusk protein data set with BLASTX using the SEEDGFKYDDIDDVEAESENDRHVD peptide sequence as a query with an e value threshold of 1 × 10−6. After identifying the putative Ca-LDA precursor, we then performed the reciprocal search with TBLASTN against the T. pisana brain transcriptome (22) using the Ca-LDA as a query with the same e value threshold. The expressed sequence tags database and BLASTp were queried to identify other putative LDA precursors from mollusks in the National Center for Biotechnology Information. One-directional best hits were declared for each query if only a single BLAST result was obtained or the ratio of the BLAST score of the second best hit to the BLAST score of the first best hit was less than 0.7. After obtaining putative LDA gene sequences from mollusks, SignalP 4.0 or Predisi was used to identify protein-coding genes containing a predicted signal peptide sequence (23). NeuroPred was employed to predict cleavage sites, post-translational modifications, and bioactive peptide products. Schematic diagrams of protein domain structures were prepared using Domain Graph (DOG, version 2.0) software. The protein three-dimensional model of LDA was built using the Assisted Model Building with Energy Refinement (AMBER) 14 program, in which the molecular dynamic simulations were sampled every picosecond for a total of 250 nanoseconds. A LDA phylogenetic tree was constructed on the MEGA 6.0 platform using the maximum likelihood test with the Jones-Taylor-Thornton method model with 1000 bootstrap replicates (24). Multiple sequence alignment schematics were generated with ClustalW and illustrated using LaTeX's TeXShade package (25).
Gross Morphology of the Reproductive System, Histology, and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) of Mucous Glands
C. aspersum (body mass, 15–35 g) and T. pisana (body mass, 4–8 g) were anesthetized with an injection of 0.5 m MgCl2. After 5 min, they were sacrificed by crushing the shell. Remnant shell was removed along with other nonessential organs, and the whole reproductive system was extracted carefully in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 m PBS (pH 7.0). Overall morphology of the reproductive system was captured through individual micrographs using a Nikon Light microscope fitted with NIS Elements software package and merged using Photoshop (Adobe).
For light microscopy, dissected mucus glands were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4 °C and subsequently dehydrated in ascending concentrations of ethanol for 30 min each. This was cleared with two changes of xylene and a final xylene-paraplast mixture for 30 min. Following paraffin wax embedding, 5-μm serial sections were prepared with a rotary microtome and floated on super frosted slides and processed for hematoxylin and eosin staining as previously described (26). Micrographs were taken using a Nikon Eclipse Light microscope fitted with the NIS Elements software package and prepared for presentation using Photoshop (Adobe). Low power micrographs were stitched together based on analysis of overlapping parts of high power micrographs.
For SEM, isolated mucous glands from C. aspersum and T. pisana adults were washed with SMT solution (250 mm sucrose, 2 mm MgCl2, and 10 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.4), and fixed in a solution of 4% glutaraldehyde plus 2% paraformaldehyde in Millonig's buffer (pH 7.2) at 4 °C for 1 h, washed with three changes of the same buffer for 5 min each, to remove fixatives, followed by postfixation in 1% osmium tetroxide in the same buffer for 30 min, and washed again in three changes of the same buffer. After fixation, specimens were dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol at 50, 70, 90, and 95% for 10 min each and three times at 100% for 15 min each. Specimens were dried in a Hitachi HCP-2 critical point drying machine, using liquid CO2 as a transitional medium. They were mounted on aluminum stubs with carbon paint adhesive and coated with gold in a Hitachi ion sputtering apparatus (E5000) for 1 min. The specimens were examined by a Hitachi S-2500 scanning electron microscope at 15 kV.
Immunofluorescent Localization of LDA Precursor in Mucous Glands
A polyclonal antibody was generated against the LDA precursor protein using keyhole limpet hemocyanin-coupled peptides to RLDKFGFSGGI-amide (Genscript). Mucous glands were isolated from C. aspersum and T. pisana and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4 °C, before dehydration in ascending concentrations of ethanol for 30 min each, cleared in xylene three times, infiltrated, and embedded in paraffin. Serial transverse sections of the tissues were cut at 5-μm thickness using a microtome. Sections were then deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in descending concentrations of ethanol. Subsequently, sections were incubated in 0.1% glycine in 0.1 m PBS for 30 min and washed three times with 0.1 m PBS containing 0.4% Triton X-100 (PBST). Nonspecific binding was blocked in 4% normal goat serum in PBST for 2 h, followed by incubation with the primary antibody (anti-peptide) at a dilution of 1:1000 in blocking solution at 4 °C overnight. Sections were then washed three times with PBST and incubated for 2 h with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Santa Cruz) at room temperature. After washing with PBST, the nuclei were stained with DAPI (Santa Cruz) for 10 min. Finally, sections were washed with PBST and mounted with VECTA shield fluorescent mounting medium (Molecular Probes, Brisbane, Australia) before viewing under a confocal laser scanning microscope (Nikon) and prepared for presentation using Photoshop (Adobe). For negative controls, tissues were processed by the same protocol, but preimmune mouse serum was used instead of primary antibody.
Results
Mucous Glands Contain a Biomolecule That Stimulates Contraction of the Copulatory Canal
Our study integrated multiple levels of analysis, including transcriptomic, proteomic, functional, and comparative analysis (Fig. 1). Digitiform mucous glands were collected from C. aspersum in which courtship, dart shooting, and copulation had been observed. Collected mucus was semipurified through size filtration into two fractions of protein molecular masses of >3 and <3 kDa and then tested on the T-junction of the copulatory canal, the region where the copulatory canal forks with the bursa tract diverticulum and bursa copulatrix (Fig. 2A). At the point in which basal contractility was observed, test preparations were administered. In response to <3-kDa mucus extract, the copulatory canal showed a sustained contraction over ∼80 s (Fig. 2A and supplemental Table S1). Although amplitudes for <3-kDa extracts were not as pronounced as basal contractility, these were significant compared with negative controls (BSA) and >3-kDa mucus extract (Fisher's exact test: p = 0.00001). The positive control (serotonin, 5-HT, 10 μm) stimulated contractile activity consistent with that of the basal contraction, although 5-HT-induced contraction was generally longer in duration.
To elucidate the molecular identity of the <3-kDa mucus-associated secreted product(s) that did stimulate copulatory canal contractility, RP-HPLC was performed on total extracts prepared from C. aspersum mucous glands (Fig. 2B). Pooled 5-min fractions were lyophilized and reconstituted in water for systematic testing for contraction. Only the pooled HPLC fractions 21–25 consistently stimulated contractility (n = 3, 100%; p = 0.0047). Subsequent in vitro analysis of the individual fractions purified on the same gradient (Fig. 2C) showed that only fraction 21 (chi-square test: χ2 = 7.20, p = 0.0119; n = 8) elicited contractility of the copulatory canal (Fig. 2D and supplemental Table S1).
To identify the mucous gland peptides, Illumina next generation transcriptome sequencing was first performed on C. aspersum mucous gland RNA (Fig. 1). This produced 58,717,616 raw reads, which after de novo sequence assembly into a mucous gland transcriptome resulted in 186,132 contigs and 57,750 unigenes. Prior to assembly, raw reads were trimmed of adapters and deposited into the GenBankTM sequence read archive database (SRX957716). After trimming, clean read length of unigenes was an average of 443 bp, and a total of 15,233 unigenes were found to have e values ≤ e10 (51.0%) when compared with the GenBankTM nonredundant database using BLASTx. An in silico mucous gland protein database was derived from this transcriptome, whereby individual transcripts were translated to ORFs and used for identification of genes encoding mucous gland peptides, including the LDA.
Mucous Glands Contain Numerous Peptides, Including a Love Dart Allohormone
To find the active fraction in the transcriptome, mucus HPLC fraction 21 (LDA) was repurified by RP-HPLC to resolve 14 subfractions. These were then analyzed by MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS, followed by matching with our mucous gland protein database. A total of 57 precursor proteins were identified that showed BLASTp matches (Table 1, supplemental Table S2, and supplemental File S1). These include matches for proteins previously defined as neuropeptides in other mollusks, including buccalin, FMRFamide, myomodulin, FFamide, and FVRIamide. An additional 55 proteins did not match with any other protein in the NCBI databases (supplemental Table S3). From HPLC fraction 21, the 14 resolved subfractions were individually tested for in vitro contractility. Fractions 7 and 12 were consistently bioactive (100% as triplicate, p < 0.01 verified by chi-square test: χ2 = 9.60; Fig. 3A and supplemental Table S1) over other fractions that showed as not meeting the threshold criterion to induce contractions, i.e. a contraction height near equal to the baseline contractile level. Following MALDI-TOF/TOF MS analysis of fractions, we identified the same the amino acid sequence SEEDGFKYDDIDDVEAESENDRHVD (2856 Da), in both bioactive fractions 7 and 12, although it appeared to be present at varying concentrations throughout most subfractions (Fig. 3B). These variations thus likely account for the inconsistent nature of contraction of subfractions in organ bath assays.
TABLE 1.
Accession numbers | No. of peptides | Description |
---|---|---|
Unigene32781_HaMG | 5 | Buccalin precursor |
CL5959.Contig2_HaMG | 5 | Non-neuronal cytoplasmic intermediate filament protein |
CL81.Contig1_HaMG | 5 | Actin |
Unigene1286_HaMG | 4 | Protein disulfide-isomerase A3 |
Unigene25454_HaMG | 2 | Transgelin-2 |
CL6679.Contig3_HaMG | 4 | Calreticulin |
CL321.Contig1_HaMG | 4 | 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein precursor |
Unigene31995_HaMG | 2 | Non-neuronal cytoplasmic intermediate filament protein |
CL1651.Contig1_HaMG | 3 | Glucose-regulated protein 94 |
Unigene33640_HaMG | 2 | 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14 |
CL3127.Contig1_HaMG | 2 | Cholinesterase-like |
Unigene33436_HaMG | 1 | Actin I |
Unigene28810_HaMG | 1 | Putative polyadenylate-binding protein 1 |
CL378.Contig1_HaMG | 1 | Polyadenylate-binding protein 4 |
CL4509.Contig2_HaMG | 2 | Elongation factor-1δ bisoform 1 |
CL4509.Contig1_HaMG | 2 | Elongation factor 1β-like |
Unigene31980_HaMG | 1 | Nucleoside diphosphate kinase B |
CL6817.Contig1_HaMG | 2 | Arginine kinase |
Unigene34625_HaMG | 1 | Fructose-biphosphatealdolase |
CL2802.Contig2_HaMG | 1 | Myosin regulatory light chain |
Unigene32295_HaMG | 1 | Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 epsilon-1 |
CL5683.Contig2_HaMG | 1 | FMRF-amide neuropeptide |
Unigene32511_HaMG | 1 | Predicted: myomodulin neuropeptides 1-like |
Unigene33563_HaMG | 1 | Endoplasmic reticulum protein ERp29 |
Unigene26477_HaMG | 1 | Predicted: endoplasmic reticulum resident protein 44-like |
CL5172.Contig2_HaMG | 1 | Heat shock protein cognate 5 partial |
CL7404.Contig6_HaMG | 1 | HSP70 |
CL6230.Contig1_HaMG | 1 | Heat shock protein 70 |
CL6830.Contig1_HaMG | 1 | Heat shock cognate protein 70 |
Unigene2750_HaMG | 1 | Predicted: muscle M-line assembly protein unc-89-like, partial |
Unigene20663_HaMG | 1 | Predicted: calcium-regulated heat stable protein 1-like |
Unigene24727_HaMG | 1 | Putative ribosomal protein |
Unigene32909_HaMG | 2 | Peptidylprolyl cis-trans isomerase B |
CL3377.Contig1_HaMG | 1 | Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein L |
Unigene4188_HaMG | 1 | FFamide |
Unigene8400_HaMG | 1 | Ribosomal protein rpl38 |
Unigene34590_HaMG | 1 | Predicted protein |
Unigene26134_HaMG | 1 | Chain A placopecten striated muscle myosin |
Unigene19980_HaMG | 1 | Predicted: 10-kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrial-like |
Unigene34509_HaMG | 1 | Predicted: phosphoenolpyruvatephosphomutase-like |
Unigene32934_HaMG | 2 | FVRIamide neuropeptide precursor |
Unigene33965_HaMG | 1 | Ribosomal protein L10a |
CL5866.Contig1_HaMG | 1 | Arginase type I-like protein |
CL331.Contig3_HaMG | 1 | Acetylcholinesterase |
CL331.Contig2_HaMG | 1 | Cholinesterase |
CL331.Contig1_HaMG | 1 | Acetylcholinesterase putative |
Unigene24585_HaMG | 1 | Myosin-VI |
CL2369.Contig2_HaMG | 1 | Calumenin-B |
CL1207.Contig1_HaMG | 1 | Predicted: glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase, mitochondrial-like |
CL3253.Contig1_HaMG | 1 | Paramyosin |
CL5457.Contig2_HaMG | 1 | Matrix metalloproteinase-21 |
CL6000.Contig1_HaMG | 1 | Predicted: ATP synthase subunit β, mitochondrial-like |
Unigene35379_HaMG | 1 | Enolase-phosphatase E1 |
CL1213.Contig1_HaMG | 1 | DnaJ-like protein subfamily B member 11 |
CL6818.Contig1_HaMG | 1 | Protein disulfide-isomerase A6 |
Unigene32024_HaMG | 1 | Protein Xenopus (Silurana) tropicalis |
CL6830.Contig1_HaMG | 1 | Heat shock cognate protein 70 |
Unigene33735_HaMG | 1 | Sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 4 |
LDA Is Derived from the Mollusk Buccalin Precursor Protein in Helicid Snails
The transcriptome data revealed that the identified C. aspersum LDA peptide is encoded by a precursor protein of 235 amino acids, which also includes a signal peptide and dibasic cleavage sites to release up to 6 amidated peptides and 3 nonamidated peptides (including LDA) (Fig. 4A). A representative tertiary structure for the LDA peptide is shown that occurred at 514.415 ns into the 700-ns molecular dynamic simulation (supplemental Fig. S1). Its structure primarily consists of an α-helix, a turn, and a random coil.
BLASTp analysis provided strong evidence that the C. aspersum LDA precursor is a homolog of buccalin precursors that have previously been identified in several mollusks, including the sea slug (Aplysia californica) and the freshwater pond snail (Lymnaea stagnalis) (27, 28) (Fig. 4B). A full-length precursor comparison indicates a similar precursor organization, particularly of 8–9 highly conserved amidated peptide repeats (supplemental Fig. S2). However, multiple amino sequence alignment of the C. aspersum LDA peptide with the corresponding region of representative aquatic and land mollusks indicates conservation within the helicid snails but little conservation with other mollusks (Fig. 4B). Phylogenetic analysis indicates that the gastropods and bivalves of have buccalin-like precursors, whereas the cephalopods do not (Fig. 4C).
To confirm that the identified peptide was responsible for the induced contractions, a synthetic C. aspersum LDA was tested in the in vitro contraction assay, and results are shown in Fig. 5A. Synthetic LDA (10 μm) could elicit contraction on 95% of times tested (chi-square test: χ2 = 4.09, p < 0.05) (Fig. 5B). This confirmed that LDA stimulates copulatory canal contraction, implicating this peptide as one of the molecules mediating paternity success in helicids that can now be tested experimentally.
LDA Distributed throughout Mucous Glands of Helicid Snails
LDA immunoreactivity was used to investigate the spatial expression of LDA within the mucous glands of C. aspersum and T. pisana, another helicid snail. Typical of helicids, their reproductive systems are composed of three major divisions (Fig. 6, A and B): 1) a hermaphroditic part, which includes the ovotestis and hermaphroditic duct; 2) a female part, which includes the oviduct proper, the fertilization pouch, spermatheca, albumen gland, egg membrane gland, the egg mass membrane gland, and the vagina, with which the duct of the bursa copulatrix is closely associated; and 3) a male part, which includes the penis and associated organs, penis retractor muscle, dart sac, and mucous glands. The male and female parts of the reproductive system of both species are quite distinct morphologically, yet they are intricately entwined, except for the more distal half of the copulatory organ and bursa copulatrix. The mucous glands in C. aspersum are complexly branched with a finger-like appearance, as highlighted by SEM that also shows a uniform smooth surface with no distinct external features (Fig. 6C). However, in T. pisana, mucous glands under SEM appear acinous with distinct irregular lobular structures consisting of a number of convoluted ridges (hillocks) separated by serrated grooves (Fig. 6D). Mucous glands of both species are fixed at the junction that intersects the dart sac.
In C. aspersum, the histology of the mucous gland revealed multiple eosinophilic goblet-like cells located on the outer periphery, with a central core full of densely packaged basophilic staining mucus (Fig. 6E). This is in addition to two types of mucus-secreting cells (msc); msc-I, mucus-deficient or empty cells, and msc-II, mucus-bearing cells (Fig. 6E, top right panel). Notably at the tip of each mucous gland are stores of basophilic mucus surrounded by supporting cells that possess loosely dispersed nuclei (Fig. 6E, bottom right panel). The T. pisana mucous gland contains aggregates of enclosed glandular pockets supported by goblet-like cells containing mucus (Fig. 6F, inset panel, left top). At the tip of the mucous gland is a dense mass of eosinophilic mucus (Fig. 6F, inset panel, left bottom).
An antibody raised against the LDA precursor was used to localize expression within the mucous glands (Fig. 6, G and H). Abundant immunoreactivity was present in both species, particularly within interstitial spaces, the mucous gland duct, and the outer and inner trabeculae that are comprised of striated muscle, connective tissue, and supporting cells. However, no LDA immunoreactivity was observed within mucus-secreting cells themselves.
Discussion
The snail's love dart activity has been documented in the literature as far back as the mid-17th century, and love dart-possessing snails were known to the ancient Greeks, probably influencing the creation of the cupid myth. However, the exact molecular identity of the active substances that the dart transfers has remained a mystery for many years. Here, we have identified the peptide that is produced in the helicid mucous glands and that is responsible for the previously reported conformational changes in the reproductive tract (13).
We used the garden snail C. aspersum to elucidate the components of the mucous gland and more specifically the molecular identity of the LDA. C. aspersum was most appropriate for this study because it had represented the helicid model for defining whether the dart achieves its effect by a mechanical action or by transferring a bioactive substance; injections of C. aspersum mucus from the mucous gland more than doubled paternity relative to injections of saline (10). The use of C. aspersum did also provide us with a relatively large bursa duct that could readily facilitate the experimental hook-up of the T-junction of the copulatory canal (forks with the bursa tract diverticulum and bursa copulatrix) for contraction bioassay. The physiological basis for LDA bioactivity is through muscular stimulation, resulting in inhibition of sperm transfer to the bursa copulatrix (13). To confirm that the identified peptide was responsible for the induced contractions, a synthetic C. aspersum LDA was tested in the in vitro contraction assay, confirming that LDA stimulates copulatory canal contraction, implicating this peptide as one of the molecules mediating paternity success in helicids that can now be tested experimentally.
The next generation sequencing transcriptome derived from the C. aspersum mucous gland enabled the rapid identification of purified bioactive peptide. This transcriptome, containing 186,132 contigs and 57,750 unigenes was also helpful to determine the existence of numerous other peptides, in addition to the LDA. For example, we identified other peptides previously defined as neuropeptides in other mollusks, including FMRFamide, myomodulin, FFamide, and FVRIamide (29). These neuropeptides have been reported sporadically throughout molluscan literature, although primarily within the aquatic snails. In land snails, the FMRFa precursor protein has been identified through in silico search of the T. pisana CNS transcriptome data set (22) and is known to have a cardioexcitatory effect in other mollusks (30, 31). The myomodulin gene was also identified from the T. pisana CNS (22), and previously the peptide was identified in C. aspersum where 3 myomodulin-related peptides are distributed throughout 26 different snail tissues (highest levels occurring in certain male reproductive organs) (32). A synthetic myomodulin (pQLSMLRLamide) could modify the spontaneous rhythmic activity or the resting tone of several isolated muscular organs (32), although the T-junction of the copulatory canal was not tested.
Bioassay of mucus RP-HPLC separated into subfractions found that only two fractions were consistently bioactive for bursa tract contraction, yet MS analysis had identified that the same peptide LDA sequence within all subfractions. One explanation may be that it was present at varying concentrations throughout most subfractions, thus likely accounting for the inconsistent nature of contraction in organ bath assays.
Our molecular analysis demonstrated that the helicid LDA is released from a buccalin-like precursor, a peptide-rich precursor that is also found in other mollusks. BLASTp analysis provided strong evidence that the C. aspersum LDA precursor is a homolog of buccalin precursors that have previously been identified in several mollusks, including the sea slug (Aplysia californica), the freshwater pond snail (Lymnaea stagnalis), and the land snail T. pisana (27, 28, 33). It is striking that two of the helicids clearly differ from the other two land snails in this comparison (Cernuella virgata and Cochlicella acuta). Cernuella has a relatively small dart and is considered to be more basal (in the family Hygromidae), as defined by the presence of an effuse shell aperture. By comparison, the pointed snail Cochlicella is also basal and has only rudimentary dart glands and no dart (17). Other peptides within the precursor protein include the buccalin peptides, which have been implicated in depressing muscle contractions in Aplysia and as neuromodulators given their widespread distribution in nervous tissue (34–36). This function is supported by the presence of the C-terminal GLamide, which is a feature also found in insect allotostatin A (37) and in the class of DLamides identified in the annelid Platyneiris demurilii (38). The buccalin gene of T. pisana has widespread expression outside the mucous gland, including the CNS of aestivated (dormant in warm conditions) snails, where the buccalin-2 isoform is distributed within regions that control several physiological roles (33).
Other LDA precursor peptides are likely coinjected into the recipient but were not tested in this study. The dart mucus can also affect the mating behavior of the recipient snails. C. aspersum that have had their digitiform mucous glands surgically removed required more courtship time to reach copulation than do negative controls (39). This demonstrates that it is the mucus from the digitiform mucous gland, not the mechanical action of the dart, which affects courtship duration. Also, injections of mucous gland homogenate decreases courtship duration of sexually receptive snails, whereas gland homogenate increases the size of the recipient's genital eversion, and retards locomotion (39). In addition, the mucus appears to affect the sperm recipient in other ways, as demonstrated in the snail Euhadra quaesita, in which the mucus suppresses subsequent matings and promotes oviposition in their partners (40), suggesting that the LDA and/or other as yet uncharacterized peptides have other physiological functions. Similarly, seminal fluid peptides of Drosophila melanogaster include a “sex peptide” that appears to be a global regulator of reproductive processes in mated recipients, including altered fecundity and sexual receptivity, and can lead to a conflict of interest over the control of reproduction (41). We expect that further studies could now be established that focus on the physiological and behavioral effects of other LDA precursor peptides, as well as other peptides that we have identified in the mucus (see supplemental Tables S2 and S3).
In summary, we present further evidence for the importance of allohormone type transfer between organisms through the identification of the LDA in a helicid snail. Given the neuromodulatory action of LDA, this opens up new opportunities for understanding the evolution of accessory gland products and alternative reproductive strategies.
Author Contributions
M. J. S. assisted with the experimental design, performed the experiments, analyzed results, and drafted the manuscript. T. W. carried out MS analysis and compiled the protein model. J. M. K. and K. B. S. conceived the idea and drafted the manuscript. S. F. C. conceived the idea, constructed the experimental design, performed experiments, analyzed results, and drafted the manuscript.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Graham Hayes (Yorke Peninsula; T. pisana), and Cliff Wilson and Mary Page (Glasshouse Gourmet Snails; C. aspersum) for supplying the snails used in this study, and Dr. Praphaporn Stewart for providing SEM of the mucous glands. We gratefully thank Dr. Alun Jones (Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland) for advice and assistance with the LC-MS/MS. We thank the (Australian) National Computational Merit Allocation Scheme for supercomputing facilities.
Note Added in Proof
In the original version of the manuscript that was published as a JBC Paper in Press on January 27, 2016, the high magnification insets of panels E–H in Fig. 6 did not correspond to the boxed regions featured in the lower magnification images. These errors have been corrected, and the corrections do not affect the interpretation of the results or the conclusions of the article.
This work was supported by Grains Research and Development Corporation Innovation and Investment Grants USU00001 (to M. J. S., T. W., and S. F. C.) and by funds from the Australian Research Council (to S. F. C. and K. B. S.). The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.
This article contains supplemental Tables S1 and S2, Fig. S1, and Files S1 and S2.
- LDA
- love dart allohormone
- contig
- group of overlapping clones
- SEM
- scanning electron microscopy
- RP
- reverse phase
- msc
- mucus-secreting cell
- 5-HT
- 5-hydroxytryptamine.
References
- 1.Wyatt T. D. (2009) Fifty years of pheromones. Nature 457, 262–263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Møller A. P. (1998) Sperm competition and sexual selection. In Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (Birkhead T. R., and Møller A. P., eds) pp. 55–90, Academic Press, San Diego, CA [Google Scholar]
- 3.Birkhead T. R., Hosken D. J., and Pitnick S. S. (2008) Sperm Biology: An Evolutionary Perspective, pp. 207–245, Academic Press, Sheffield, UK [Google Scholar]
- 4.Charnov E. L. (1979) Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 2480–2484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Scharer L., and Pen I. (2013) Sex allocation and investment into pre- and post-copulatory traits in simultaneous hermaphrodites: the role of polyandry and local sperm competition. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 368, 20120052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nakadera Y., and Koene J. M. (2013) Reproductive strategies in hermaphroditic gastropods: conceptual and empirical approaches 1. Can. J. Zool. 91, 367–381 [Google Scholar]
- 7.Leonard J. L. (2006) Sexual selection: lessons from hermaphrodite mating systems. Integr. Comp. Biol. 46, 349–367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Baur B. (1998) Sperm competition in molluscs. In Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (Birkhead T. R., and Møller A. P., eds) pp. 255–306, Academic Press, San Diego, CA [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chung D. J. D. (1987) Courtship and dart shooting behavior of the land snail Helix aspersa. Veliger 30, 24–39 [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chase R., and Blanchard K. C. (2006) The snail's love-dart delivers mucus to increase paternity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 273, 1471–1475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Adamo S. A., and Chase R. (1988) Courtship and copulation in the terrestrial snail Helix aspersa. Can. J. Zool. 66, 1446–1453 [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hunt S. (1979) The structure and compositon of the love dart (gypsobelum) in Helix pomatia. Tissue Cell 11, 51–61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Koene J. M., and Chase R. (1998) Changes in the reproductive system of the snail Helix aspersa caused by mucus from the love dart. J. Exp. Biol. 201, 2313–2319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Leonard J. L. (1992) The “love-dart” in Helicid snails: a gift of calcium or a firm commitment? J. Theor. Biol. 159, 513–521 [Google Scholar]
- 15.Adamo S. A., and Chase R. (1990) Dissociation of sexual arousal and sexual proclivity in the garden snail, Helix aspersa. Behav. Neural Biol. 54, 115–130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rogers D., and Chase R. (2001) Dart receipt promotes sperm storage in the garden snail Helix aspersa. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50, 122–127 [Google Scholar]
- 17.Koene J. M., and Schulenburg H. (2005) Shooting darts: co-evolution and counter-adaptation in hermaphroditic snails. BMC Evol. Biol. 5, 25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Koene J. M., and Chase R. (1998) The love dart of Helix aspersa Muller is not a gift of calcium. J. Moll. Stud. 64, 75–80 [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lind H. (1973) The functional significance of the spermatophore and the fate of spermatozoa in the genital tract of Helix pomatia (Gastropoda, Stylommatophora). J. Zool. 169, 39–64 [Google Scholar]
- 20.Koene J. M., and ter Maat A. (2001) “Allohormones”: a class of bioactive substances favoured by sexual selection. J. Comp. Physiol. A 187, 323–326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bernard A., and Bonnet V. (1930) The mineral composition of haemolymph and study of physiological solution for the snail. R. Soc. Biol. Paris 103, 1110–1120 [Google Scholar]
- 22.Adamson K. J., Wang T., Zhao M., Bell F., Kuballa A. V., Storey K. B., and Cummins S. F. (2015) Molecular insights into land snail neuropeptides through transcriptome and comparative gene analysis. BMC Genomics 16, 308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nielsen H., Engelbrecht J., Brunak S., and von Heijne G. (1997) Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. Protein Eng. 10, 1–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jones D. T., Taylor W. R., and Thornton J. M. (1992) The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8, 275–282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Beitz. E. (2000) TEXshade: shading and labeling of multiple sequence alignments using LATEX2 epsilon. Bioinformatics 16, 135–139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kuanpradit C., Stewart M. J., York P. S., Degnan B. M., Sobhon P., Hanna P. J., Chavadej J., and Cummins S. F. (2012) Characterization of mucus-associated proteins from abalone (Haliotis): candidates for chemical signaling. FEBS J. 279, 437–450 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cropper E. C., Miller M. W., Tenenbaum R., Kolks M. A., Kupfermann I., and Weiss K. R. (1988) Structure and action of buccalin: a modulatory neuropeptide localized to an identified small cardioactive peptide-containing cholinergic motor neuron of Aplysia californica. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 6177–6181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Santama N., Wheeler C. H., Burke J. F., and Benjamin P. R. (1994) Neuropeptides myomodulin, small cardioactive peptide, and buccalin in the central nervous system of Lymnaea stagnalis: purification, immunoreactivity, and artifacts. J. Comp. Neurol. 342, 335–351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Morishita F., Furukawa Y., Matsushima O., and Minakata H. (2010) Regulatory actions of neuropeptides and peptide hormones on the reproduction of molluscs. Can. J. Zool. 88, 825–845 [Google Scholar]
- 30.Higgins W. J., Price D. A., and Greenberg M. J. (1978) FMRFamide increases the adenylate cyclase activity and cyclic AMP level of molluscan heart. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 48, 425–430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Price D. A., and Greenberg M. J. (1989) The hunting of the FaRPs: the distribution of FMRFamide-related peptides. Biol. Bull. 177, 198–205 [Google Scholar]
- 32.Greenberg M. J., Doble K. E., Lesser W., Lee T. D., Pennell N. A., Morgan C. G., and Price D. A. (1997) Characterization of myomodulin-related peptides from the pulmonate snail Helix aspersa. Peptides 18, 1099–1106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Adamson K. J., Wang T., Rotgans B., Kruangkum T., Kuballa A. V., Storey K. B., and Cummins S. F. (2015) Genes and associated peptides involved with aestivation in a land snail. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. pii, S0016–6480(15)30013–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cropper E. C., Miller M. W., Vilim F. S., Tenenbaum R., Kupfermann I., and Weiss K. R. (1990) Buccalin is present in the cholinergic motor neuron B16 of Aplysia and it depresses accessory radula closer muscle contractions evoked by stimulation of B16. Brain Res. 512, 175–179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vilim F. S., Cropper E. C., Rosen S. C., Tenenbaum R., Kupfermann I., and Weiss K. R. (1994) Structure, localization, and action of buccalin B: a bioactive peptide from Aplysia. Peptides 15, 959–969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Miller M. W., Alevizos A., Cropper E. C., Kupfermann I., and Weiss K. R. (1992) Distribution of buccalin-like immunoreactivity in the central nervous system and peripheral tissues of Aplysia californica. J. Comp. Neurol. 320, 182–195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Veenstra J. A. (2010) Neurohormones and neuropeptides encoded by the genome of Lottia gigantea, with reference to other mollusks and insects. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 167, 86–103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Conzelmann M., and Jékely G. (2012) Antibodies against conserved amidated neuropeptide epitopes enrich the comparative neurobiology toolbox. Evodevo 3, 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Adamo S. A., and Chase R. (1990) The “love dart” of the snail Helix aspersa injects a pheromone that decreases courtship duration. J. Exp. Zool. 255, 80–87 [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kimura K., Shibuya K., and Chiba S. (2013) The mucus of a land snail love-dart suppresses subsequent matings in darted individuals. Anim. Behav. 85, 631–635 [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gioti A., Wigby S., Wertheim B., Schuster E., Martinez P., Pennington C. J., Partridge L., and Chapman T. (2012) Sex peptide of Drosophila melanogaster males is a global regulator of reproductive processes in females. Proc. Biol. Sci. 279, 4423–4432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pomiankowski A., and Reguera P. (2001) The point of love. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 533–534 [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.