Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Surg Int. 2013 May 26;29(7):703–708. doi: 10.1007/s00383-013-3326-4

Clinical management of infantile fibrosarcoma: a retrospective single-institution review

Lalit Parida 1, Israel Fernandez-Pineda 2, John K Uffman 3, Andrew M Davidoff 4, Matthew J Krasin 5, Alberto Pappo 6, Bhaskar N Rao 7
PMCID: PMC4825685  NIHMSID: NIHMS747128  PMID: 23708972

Abstract

Background

Infantile fibrosarcoma (IFS) is an uncommon soft-tissue sarcoma. Here we review our experience treating this tumor.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively reviewed records of patients with IFS treated at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital between 1980 and 2009.

Results

We identified 15 patients, 8 girls and 7 boys; 13 white and 2 black. Median age at diagnosis was 3 months. Primary sites included the leg (n = 3), chest wall (n = 2), foot (n = 2), and one each in the tongue, occipital region, axilla, parascapular region, arm, forearm, retroperitoneum, and thigh. All patients underwent resection; 11 upfront surgery, and 4 delayed. Complications included loss of the posterior tibial nerve and artery, axillary vein, biceps, pectoralis major, gallbladder, and transverse/sigmoid sinus. Eight received chemotherapy and three radiotherapy. Seven experienced local recurrence and three lung metastasis. Median follow-up was 65 months. At the time of the review, 12 patients were alive and 3 had died. All deaths were in patients older than 1 year at diagnosis with an axial primary site.

Conclusions

Non-mutilating surgery should be the primary treatment for IFS. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is indicated when upfront resection is unfeasible. Patients with positive surgical margins should receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Radiotherapy is indicated for axial primary sites where complete resection is impossible.

Keywords: Fibrosarcoma, Infant, Retrospective study, Surgery

Introduction

Soft tissue sarcomas account for 7.4 % of all malignancies in people younger than 20 years [1]. Infantile fibrosarcoma (IFS) is the most common non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue tumor with an incidence of 24.5 % of all soft tissue sarcomas seen in the first year of life [2]. It can be present at birth or can develop during the first 5 years, particularly in infants and toddlers younger than 2 years; 80 % of cases are diagnosed during the first year of life [35]. IFS most commonly presents as a non-tender, poorly circumscribed mass varying in size and consistency [6, 7]. Compared with the adult form of fibrosarcoma, IFS is characterized by a lower incidence of metastasis (<10 %), a higher probability of long-term survival (90 % at 5 years), and greater chemosensitivity [710].

Surgical excision has been the mainstay of treatment over the last few decades, but a few patients receive additional chemotherapy or radiotherapy [3, 79, 11]. Primary excision can entail a radical and even mutilating procedure that results in high morbidity. Recent studies have continued to advocate surgery and have added chemotherapy and radiotherapy in select conditions [3, 12]. Loh et al. [13] reviewed 11 patients with IFS and concluded that initial chemotherapy combined with surgery is the most successful treatment. A recent multi-institutional European study concluded that conservative surgery is the mainstay of treatment, and alkylating agent and anthracycline-free first-line chemotherapy should be used to treat unresectable tumors [14]. Here, we describe our experience in the clinical management of IFS at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital.

Materials and methods

The medical records of patients with IFS treated at St. Jude from 1980 to 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. This study was approved by the St. Jude institutional review board. All patients with a histopathologic diagnosis of IFS were included. Records were analyzed for demographic details, procedural details, pathologic details, and outcome.

Results

Patient demographics and characteristics

Fifteen patients were included in our study; 8 were girls and 7 were boys; 13 were white and 2 were black (Table 1). The median age at diagnosis was 3 months (range 3 days to 36 months). The primary sites of lesions included the leg (n = 3), chest wall (n = 2), foot (n = 2), and one each in the tongue, occipital region, axilla, parascapular region, arm, forearm, retroperitoneum, and thigh. The primary lesion was located on the left side in seven patients and on the right side in eight patients. The size of the primary lesion was noted in 11 cases; the median size was 5.6 cm (range 2–12 cm). Signs of disease were first noticed at a median age of 2 months (range 0–28 months). All patients presented with a painless swelling.

Table 1.

Demographics of 15 patients with infantile fibrosarcoma

Patient number Age, sex Years Location, laterality Treatment at presentation
Mets at diagnosis Comments, late effects Status, duration of follow-up (months from diagnosis)
Surgery, structure lost, surgical margins (+/−) Chemotherapy Radiation
1 5 mo, M 1980 Axilla, left WLE, left axillary vein, (−) No No No Local recurrence (excised) NED, 122
2 3 mo, F 1980 Leg, left WLE, posterior tibial artery/nerve, posterior compartment muscles, (−) No No No Calcaneal valgus deformity NED, 264
3 5 days, M 1983 Foot, right WLE, (−) No No No Local recurrence (disarticulation at ankle) NED, 65
4 2 mo, F 1983 Arm, right WLE, biceps, (−) No No No Right scapula recurrence (forequarter amputation) NED, 224
5 27 mo, M 1984 Chest wall, left WLE, (−) Yes No No Local recurrence (WLE), lung mets (chemo) Died, 18
6 1 mo, F 1985 Tongue Debulking, (−) No No No Local recurrence (midline glossectomy) NED, 6
7 29 mo, F 1986 Retroperitoneum Partial resection, gall bladder, (−) Yes Yes Yes (omental LN) Local recurrence (radioactive implants), biliary obstruction Died, 52
8 6 mo, F 1987 Occipital region WLE with dural graft, transverse/sigmoid sinus, (−) No No No Encephalomalacia NED, 240
9 3 days, M 1993 Leg, right Above-knee amputation, (−) Yes No No Bilateral lung mets (thoracotomy, chemotherapy, radiation) NED, 240
10 36 mo, F 1994 Chest wall, left WLE, pectoralis major/minor, (+) Yes Yes No Local recurrence (excision, chemotherapy, radiation), lung/mediastinum mets Died, 69
11 21 days, F 2001 Leg, left WLE, posterior tibial nerve/artery, posterior compartment muscles, (+) Yes No No Limb length discrepancy NED, 93
12 23 mo, M 2003 Foot, right WLE, (+) Yes No No Below-knee amputation NED, 40
13 6 mo, M 2006 Parascapular region WLE, (+) No No No NED, 36
14 35 days, F 2008 Forearm, right WLE, (+) Yes No No NED, 13
15 42 days, M 2009 Thigh, left WLE, (+) Yes No No NED, 11

Mets metastasis, WLE wide local excision, LN lymph node, NED no evidence of disease, +/− positive/negative

Clinical management

Diagnostic imaging varied with the availability of modalities at the time of diagnosis. Primary lesions were imaged by plain radiograph, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance. Metastasis was detected by chest radiograph, chest computed tomography, and bone scan imaging. Metastasis was present in one patient at the time of diagnosis. An initial biopsy was done in all patients. All 15 patients underwent surgical resection; 11 had upfront surgery and 4 had delayed surgical resection. Local control included wide local excision (n = 12), debulking (n = 1), partial resection (n = 1), and amputation (n = 1). Five patients underwent re-excision of their primary lesions and two underwent a second biopsy during therapy. Of the five patients who underwent re-excision, only one with a chest wall lesion needed adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy as further treatment.

For eight patients, no major nerve, vessel, muscle, or organ was sacrificed during surgical excision. The following tissues were lost in the remaining seven patients: posterior tibial nerve and artery (n = 2), axillary vein (n = 1), biceps (n = 1), pectoralis major (n = 1), gall-bladder (n = 1), and transverse/sigmoid sinus (n = 1). Surgical margins were positive in six patients (patients 10 through 15); these were treated with further adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 3), adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy (n = 1), adjuvant chemotherapy and re-excision (n = 1), or re-excision alone (n = 1).

Patients were treated on an institutional protocol with adjuvant or neoadjuvant multiagent chemotherapy. Four patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and eight received adjuvant chemotherapy. Three tumors decreased in size in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as indicated by imaging studies. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisted of the VAC regimen (vincristine, actinomycin-D, and cyclophosphamide) for patients 7, 11, 14, and 15, and doxorubicin and dacarbazine were added for patient 7. Eight patients (patients 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, and 15) received the VAC regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy. Patient 5 also received doxorubicin and dacarbazine. Patient 10 received the VAC regimen alternating with vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide and subsequently received vincristine, ifosfamide, and etoposide. Patients 7 and 10 received initial adjuvant radiation and patient 9 received radiation for metastasis. Patient 7 received abdominal radiation (45 Gy), patient 10 received brachy-therapy (24.7 Gy) and external beam radiation (45 Gy), and patient 9 received pulmonary radiation (12 Gy).

Outcome

No recurrence of IFS tumor was reported in seven patients. Five patients (patients 1, 3, 4, 6, and 7) had only local recurrence. Two patients (patients 5 and 10) had local recurrence and lung metastasis. Patient 9 had only lung metastasis. Local recurrence was treated by amputation (patients 3 and 4), re-excision (patients 1, 5, and 6), chemotherapy and radiotherapy (patient 7), or excision, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy (patient 10).

The median follow-up period for the entire group was 65 months (range 6 months to 22 years). At last follow-up, 12 (80 %) of the patients were alive. 7 (58.3 %) had been treated by surgery alone, 4 (33.3 %) by surgery and chemotherapy, and 1 (8.3 %) by surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. None were treated with chemotherapy alone. Of the three patients who died, the causes of death were progressive lung disease (n = 2), progressive abdominal disease, and biliary obstruction (n = 1). The median duration of follow-up of the IFS survivors was 79 months.

Nine patients had no late effects of treatment. The late effects of treatment in the remaining six patients included leg-length discrepancy and leg and foot hypoplasia (n = 1), calcaneal valgus deformity (n = 1), encephalomalacia (n = 1), radiation pericarditis (n = 1), scoliosis (n = 1), and splenic involution (n = 1).

Discussion

Wide local excision, rather than radical ablative surgery, should be the initial choice of surgery in patients with IFS, as it was in 12 of 15 of our patients. A complete resection with negative surgical margins is the goal, but it is often limited by the fact that these tumors surround and invade neurovascular bundles and can replace muscle groups [15]. In this situation, delayed surgery is advocated. Amputation or disarticulation used to be indicated when obtaining negative surgical margins was not possible by a less aggressive approach [11], but it should be avoided, especially if the tumor does not involve the neurovascular bundle. The primary and secondary amputation rates have been reported to be approximately 50 % [16]. In our study, an initial conservative complete resection was possible in 4 of 15 patients. Another study showed a rate of 21 % [14]. Lymphadenectomy is usually not warranted, because IFS seldom metastasizes to lymph nodes, but two case reports have described regional lymph node metastasis [17, 18]. We did not observe any regional lymph node metastasis, except for positive omental lymph nodes in the patient with a retroperitoneal lesion.

The outcome for patients who needed only surgery as their treatment was favorable in our study. All seven patients who needed only surgery were alive at the end of the study period. This group of patients had a median age of 3 months (range 5 days to 6 months) at diagnosis. Four of these seven patients had a local recurrence that was managed with a second surgery, and none of them had a distant metastasis. Only one of these seven patients had a positive surgical margin after an initial excision, but negative margins were achieved in this patient after a second wide local excision. It has been reported that children whose tumors are completely resected have a 100 % probability of 5-year survival, but those with residual disease after resection who receive adjuvant therapy still fare well (5-year survival, 76 %) [14].

It was previously reported that the presence of positive postsurgical margins is an important prognostic factor [19]. Positive margins were noted in six of our patients. Of these, one patient died of lung metastasis and five were alive with no evidence of disease (median follow-up, 38 months). According to our study, a positive postsurgical margin did not always indicate a poor outcome. Local recurrence or systemic metastasis was observed in one of the six patients with a positive margin. Whether chemotherapy is an effective treatment for microscopic positive margins after surgical resection is still not well defined [13]. In our study, five of six patients with a positive margin received adjuvant chemotherapy. Positive surgical margins after resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy may not indicate a poor prognosis [20]. In unresectable cases or in cases in which major ablative surgery is the only possibility, we suggest preoperative chemotherapy to decrease tumor size, followed by resection to achieve complete resection or resection with microscopic residual disease, especially where margins involve the neurovascular bundle. Three patients with positive margins in the current study received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and all were alive at the time of the review. A recent study concluded that most patients with positive margins after resection treated without adjuvant chemotherapy and those with unresectable tumors treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were long-term survivors [14].

The role of chemotherapy has been described in previous reports [14, 16, 2123]. Patients have been treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy [13, 23] or chemotherapy alone [18, 21, 22, 24]. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be used for extensive lesions when complete surgical excision during an upfront procedure is not possible or would result in amputation [20, 25]. Local recurrence was observed in one of four patients in the current study who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but no systemic metastasis was observed in the four patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been advocated to reduce the risk of both local recurrence and metastasis [14, 26]. In five patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy for positive surgical margins in the current study, local recurrence was observed in one and systemic metastasis occurred in one. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy after initial surgery is less well defined [13, 14, 19, 23]. A previous review of the literature revealed 22 cases of IFS treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. The most commonly used chemo-therapeutic drugs in that review were vincristine, cyclo-phosphamide, actinomycin-D, and doxorubicin; ifosfamide and etoposide were used to treat infants [27].

Radiotherapy of the primary site in our study was limited to partially resected tumors (chest wall and retroperitoneum); however, this modality was also used to treat lung metastasis. Radiation was administered to only one patient with a positive surgical margin, one who had a chest wall lesion, in the current study. Two groups have reported that local control was significantly better in patients with microscopic residual disease who received postoperative radiotherapy [19, 25]. Cecchetto et al. [3] administered radiotherapy to patients who were 3 years or older and had microscopic or macroscopic residual tumor. Radiotherapy is usually not advocated because it has the potential to impair growth [28].

Local relapse is more common in children younger than 5 years at diagnosis; whereas distant metastasis is more common in children older than 10 years at diagnosis [9], and the lung is the most common site of metastasis of IFS [8]. The incidence of distant metastasis in our study was 20 % and all were in the lung. The probability of local recurrence can be as high as 43 %; this usually occurs within 1 year of previous surgery, but may occur 5–31 years after the initial resection [7, 9, 11, 2931]. Local recurrence was observed in 7 of 15 patients in the current study. It has been reported that factors associated with local recurrence included postoperative microscopic residual disease, intra-abdominal primary tumor, and the omission of adjuvant radiotherapy [19]. However, only one of seven patients in our study with a local recurrence had a positive surgical margin. Survival after isolated local recurrence is significantly better than that after distant or combined local and distant recurrence, and in most cases, death after local recurrence is caused by subsequent metastatic disease [19].

Although fibrosarcoma most commonly occurs in adults in the fourth through sixth decades, it does occur in the first two decades. Congenital or infantile fibrosarcoma, despite its similarity to the adult variant, tends to be much less aggressive with limited potential for metastasis. Children younger than 5 years at the time of diagnosis of IFS have a 7.3 % mortality rate that is due to either the primary tumor or metastasis [9]. Mortality was observed in 3 of 15 of our patients. The three patients who died in our series had axially located tumors and were older than 1 year at diagnosis (median age, 29 months). Two of these patients died from progressive metastatic pulmonary disease and one died due to progressive abdominal disease and biliary obstruction. Age is an important prognostic factor and lesions detected during infancy have the best prognosis [32]. In our study, 5 of 12 of the survivors (median age, 7 weeks) had a positive surgical margin and 4 of 12 of the survivors had a local recurrence.

It is acknowledged that chemotherapy, surgical techniques, and radiation modalities have evolved during the 30-year period covered by the current study. Moreover, this study involves a small number of patients and is retrospective in nature. However, all these patients were managed by a single surgeon over this 30-year study eriod. The conclusions drawn from these 15 cases and the subsequent recommendations are, therefore, tempered and incorporate the experience of others from recent literature. We recommend non-mutilating surgery as the primary modality of treatment for IFS, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy is indicated in cases in which upfront resection is not feasible. Patients with positive surgical margins should receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Radiotherapy is indicated for axial primary sites where complete resection is not possible. Due to the deleterious effects on infants, we suggest at present to closely watch them after resection and institute brachytherapy if needed. Mortality is high in children older than 1 year at the time of diagnosis of IFS and in those with axial primary sites.

Acknowledgments

Our sincere thanks to Angela J. McArthur and David Galloway of Scientific Editing for assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. This work is supported in part by a grant from the Cancer Center Support (CORE) Grant 21765 and Grant 23099 from the National Cancer Institute and by the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC).

Footnotes

Conflict of interest Nothing to declare.

Contributor Information

Lalit Parida, Department of Surgery, MS 133, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN 38105-3678, USA.

Israel Fernandez-Pineda, Department of Surgery, MS 133, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN 38105-3678, USA.

John K. Uffman, Department of Surgery, MS 133, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN 38105-3678, USA. Division of Pediatric General Surgery, Le Bonheur Children’s Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA

Andrew M. Davidoff, Department of Surgery, MS 133, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN 38105-3678, USA. Division of Pediatric General Surgery, Le Bonheur Children’s Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. Department of Surgery and Pediatrics, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Memphis, TN, USA

Matthew J. Krasin, Division of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA

Alberto Pappo, Solid Tumor Division, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.

Bhaskar N. Rao, Email: Bhaskar.Rao@stjude.org, Department of Surgery, MS 133, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN 38105-3678, USA. Department of Surgery and Pediatrics, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Memphis, TN, USA

References

  • 1.Gurney JG, Young JL, Roffers SD, Smith MA, Bunin GR. Soft tissue sarcomas. In: Gloecker Ries IA, Smith MA, Gurney JG, Linet M, Tamra T, Young JL, Bunin GR, editors. SEER pediatric monograph: cancer incidence and survival among children and adolescents, United States SEER program 1975–1995. National Cancer Institute; Bethesda: 1999. pp. 111–124. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sultan I, Casanova M, Al-Jumaily U, Meazza C, Rodriguez-Galindo C, Ferrari A. Soft tissue sarcomas in the first year of life. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:2449–2456. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cecchetto G, Carli M, Alaggio R, Dall’Igna P, Bisogno G, Scarzello G, Zanetti I, Durante G, Inserra A, Siracusa F, Guglielmi M Italian Cooperative Group. Fibrosarcoma in pediatric patients: results of the Italian cooperative group studies (1979–1995) J Surg Oncol. 2001;78:225–231. doi: 10.1002/jso.1157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ferguson WS. Advances in the adjuvant treatment of infantile fibrosarcoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2003;3:185–191. doi: 10.1586/14737140.3.2.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Frieden IJ, Rogers M, Garzon MC. Conditions masquerading as infantile haemangioma: part 2. Australas J Dermatol. 2009;50:153–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2009.00529_1.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Adibe OO, Juang D, Valusek PA, Holcomb GW, 3rd, Snyder CL. Infantile fibrosarcoma: two case reports and literature review. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2011;21:200–202. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1271734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Exelby PR, Knapper WH, Huvos AG, Beattie EJ. Soft-tissue fibrosarcoma in children. J Pediatr Surg. 1973;8:415–420. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(73)90112-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chung EB, Enzinger FM. Infantile fibrosarcoma. Cancer. 1976;38:729–739. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197608)38:2<729::aid-cncr2820380216>3.0.co;2-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Soule EH, Pritchard DJ. Fibrosarcoma in infants and children: a review of 110 cases. Cancer. 1977;40:1711–1721. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197710)40:4<1711::aid-cncr2820400447>3.0.co;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Coffin CM, Jaszcz W, O’Shea PA, Dehner LP. So-called congenital-infantile fibrosarcoma: does it exist and what is it? Pediatr Pathol. 1994;14:133–150. doi: 10.3109/15513819409022033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Blocker S, Koenig J, Ternberg J. Congenital fibrosarcoma. J Pediatr Surg. 1987;22:665–670. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(87)80123-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tröbs R, Meier T, Bennek J, Heinrich S, Willnow U. Fibrosarcoma in infants and children: a retrospective analysis—overdiagnosis in earlier years. Pediatr Surg Int. 1999;15:123–128. doi: 10.1007/s003830050532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Loh ML, Ahn P, Perez-Atayde AR, Gebhardt MC, Shamberger RC, Grier HE. Treatment of infantile fibrosarcoma with chemotherapy and surgery: results from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Children’s Hospital, Boston. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2002;24:722–726. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200212000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Orbach D, Rey A, Cecchetto G, Oberlin O, Casanova M, Thebaud E, Scopinaro M, Bisogno G, Carli M, Ferrari A. Infantile fibrosarcoma: management based on the European experience. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:318–323. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.21.9972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Coffin CM, Dehner LP. Fibroblastic-myofibroblastic tumors in children and adolescents: a clinicopathologic study of 108 examples in 103 patients. Pediatr Pathol. 1991;11:569–588. doi: 10.3109/15513819109064791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kurkchubasche AG, Halvorson EG, Forman EN, Terek RM, Ferguson WS. The role of preoperative chemotherapy in the treatment of infantile fibrosarcoma. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35:880–883. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2000.6871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.van Niekerk ML, Nel WA, Slavik T. Infantile fibrosarcoma of the ileum presenting with congenital bowel obstruction. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45:461–462. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.10.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Demir HA, Akyüz C, Varan A, Ergen FB, Büyükpamukçu M. Right foot congenital infantile fibrosarcoma treated only with chemotherapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010;54:618–620. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Spunt SL, Poquette CA, Hurt YS, Cain AM, Rao BN, Merchant TE, Jenkins JJ, Santana VM, Pratt CB, Pappo AS. Prognostic factors for children and adolescents with surgically resected non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma: an analysis of 121 patients treated at St Jude Children’s Research Hospital. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:3697–3705. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.12.3697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Russell H, Hicks MJ, Bertuch AA, Chintagumpala M. Infantile fibrosarcoma: clinical and histologic responses to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009;53:23–27. doi: 10.1002/pbc.21981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Grier HE, Perez-Atayde AR, Weinstein HJ. Chemotherapy for inoperable infantile fibrosarcoma. Cancer. 1985;56:1507–1510. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19851001)56:7<1507::aid-cncr2820560705>3.0.co;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kynaston JA, Malcolm AJ, Craft AW, Davies SM, Jones PH, King DJ, Mitchell CD, Oakhill A, Stiller CA. Chemotherapy in the management of infantile fibrosarcoma. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1993;21:488–493. doi: 10.1002/mpo.2950210706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ninane J, Gosseye S, Panteon E, Claus D, Rombouts JJ, Cornu G. Congenital fibrosarcoma. Preoperative chemotherapy and conservative surgery. Cancer. 1986;58:1400–1406. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19861001)58:7<1400::aid-cncr2820580703>3.0.co;2-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Surico G, Muggeo P, Daniele RM, Novielli C, Rigillo N, Minervini C. Chemotherapy alone for the treatment of congenital fibrosarcoma: is surgery always needed? Med Pediatr Oncol. 2003;40:268–270. doi: 10.1002/mpo.10150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Akyüz C, Küpeli S, Varan A, Gedikoglu G, Yalçin B, Kutluk T, Büyükpamukçu M. Infantile fibrosarcoma: retrospective analysis of eleven patients. Tumori. 2011;97:166–169. doi: 10.1177/030089161109700206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yan AC, Chamlin SL, Liang MG, Hoffman B, Attiyeh EF, Chang B, Honig PJ. Congenital infantile fibrosarcoma: a masquerader of ulcerated hemangioma. Pediatr Dermatol. 2006;23:330–334. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2006.00257.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ramphal R, Manson D, Viero S, Zielenska M, Gerstle T, Pappo A. Retroperitoneal infantile fibrosarcoma: clinical, molecular, and therapeutic aspects of an unusual tumor. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2003;20:635–642. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pousti TJ, Upton J, Loh M, Grier H. Congenital fibrosarcoma of the upper extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:1158–1162. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199809040-00037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cofer BR, Vescio PJ, Wiener ES. Infantile fibrosarcoma: complete excision is the appropriate treatment. Ann Surg Oncol. 1996;3:159–161. doi: 10.1007/BF02305795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hays DM, Mirabal VQ, Karlan MS, Patel HR, Landing BH. Fibrosarcomas in infants and children. J Pediatr Surg. 1970;5:176–183. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(70)90274-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.DeComas AM, Heinrich SD, Craver R. Infantile fibrosarcoma successfully treated with chemotherapy, with occurrence of calcifying aponeurotic fibroma and pleomorphic/spindled celled lipoma at the site 12 years later. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2009;31:448–452. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e3181a1c0c4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Stout AP. Fibrosarcoma in infants and children. Cancer. 1962;15:1028–1040. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196209/10)15:5<1028::aid-cncr2820150520>3.0.co;2-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES