Abstract
Background & Purpose
Rugby requires unique demands from its players. Those involved in rehabilitation and care of these athletes must possess an understanding of both the game and various positions. There have been numerous reports focusing on the physiological demands and biomechanical analyses of various components of gameplay, but no specific progression has been developed to assist clinicians assessing the readiness to return of a player after injury. The purpose of this clinical commentary is to outline testing components, general gameplay guidelines, movement progressions, and sport and position-specific progressions related to rugby gameplay following a lower extremity injury.
Description of Topic
This commentary provides a recommended progression for clinical use for use in a return to rugby program. It includes metabolic considerations, advanced strengthening exercises, agility exercises, and incorporation of drills specific to the sport of rugby that may be performed with the clinician or with assistance from team members. This progression also includes testing parameters for each phase and guidance for clinicians regarding the ability to gauge readiness to return to sport.
Discussion
It is essential that an athlete returning to the sport of rugby undertake a guided, graduated return to sport progression to ensure safety and to decrease the risk of re-injury. This proposed return to sport progression outlines key parameters for both the sport as a whole and for various specific positions.
Level of Evidence
Level 5 – Clinical Commentary, Review of Literature
Keywords: Positional demands, rehabilitation, return to play, rugby
INTRODUCTION
Clinicians involved in the care of rugby players must not only be aware of the underlying pathology of the injured site, but also the specific physiological demands required for successful play in this sport. In addition, the various positions in the game of rugby each necessitate a unique skill set and metabolic requirement for effective performance in the domains of speed, agility, power, and endurance. Returning an athlete to sport requires a multidisciplinary approach, often involving surgeons, other physicians, physical therapists, athletic trainers, strength and performance coaches, nutritionists, and psychologists. As a rehabilitation specialist, knowledge of each rugby position is essential in order to fully prepare the player for successful reintegration into competition.
Time missed from match or training due to injury has been reported to range from two hours1 to over 262 hours per 1000 player hours.2 The lower extremity is the most common site of injury, with 41% to 55% of all injuries in rugby sustained in the lower extremity.3 Medial collateral ligament (MCL) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries have been reported to result in the greatest proportion of absence from play.4 Lateral ankle sprains are the most common injury occurring at the ankle joint.5,6 Noncontact injuries account for 57% of those sustained during training,6 although this proportion decreases during match play.5 Noncontact injuries of the knee have been reported to be as high as 22% of all match related injuries.4 Hamstring muscle injuries account for the highest number of noncontact injuries overall.5,6
The purpose of this clinical commentary is to outline testing components, general gameplay guidelines, movement progressions, and sport and position-specific progressions related to rugby gameplay following an injury to the lower extremity.
GENERAL GAMEPLAY
The sport of rugby is played with 15 members per team (8 forwards and 7 backs) on a 100 meter by 70 meter field with two try zones at either end that are 10 meters deep. A typical match duration is 80 minutes total with two 40 minute halves, as well as additional stoppage time as needed. Players may run in any direction as long as they do not use another player to block for them, which results in an infringement called obstruction.
Although the game clock is designed for continuous play, the sport of rugby is played primarily in bursts of varying duration that depends upon an assortment of factors, such as a player's position and role in the game. Elite players reach peak speeds of 13.1-19.3 miles•hour−1 with the total distance covered by players in a match ranging from 3.9-4.5 miles.44 On average, players compete at a mean of 80-85% of their VO2 maximum and at approximately 88% of their maximal heart rate.44
In general, backs cover greater total distances than forwards.44 However, flankers devote the most time of the forwards in the high and maximal intensity speed zones.44 Forwards sprint an average distance of 8.0 meters for an average duration of 1.1 seconds while backs sprint an average distance of 13.8 meters for an average duration of 1.8 seconds.45 Just as the sprint distances and durations vary, the metabolic demands between backs and forwards also differ. Due to their involvement in rucks, mauls, and scrums, forwards require an increased aerobic capacity to continue play following these events, even at a reduced pace. In contrast, backs perform in a more anaerobic environment as they alternate between bursts of speed followed by walking between various stops in play. Therefore, the work-to-rest ratio commonly used in training is typically 1:7 for forwards and 1:20 for backs.46
REQUIREMENTS FOR RETURN TO RUGBY
After sustaining an injury to the lower extremity, the athlete progresses through the stages of healing and various fundamentals must be in place prior to examination for and consideration of return to sport. It is assumed that the athlete will demonstrate adequate progression in proper healing parameters, range of motion, and muscular strength as listed in Table 1 prior to progressing to any type of return to sport progression. Unilateral balance and strength training are usually addressed as early as possible to ensure movement normalization. Strength training may then be progressed to circuit training in order to promote a capacity for power endurance using a variety of training modalities, such as Olympic weightlifting, traditional weight training, and other ancillary exercises. Neuromuscular compensations and deficits often persist following any lower extremity injury and typically require guided correction.7,8 Normalization of these deficits assists in decreasing the risk of a subsequent injury and the movement strategies obtained during this phase serve as the basis for progression through the later phases of rehabilitation.9,10
Table 1.
Criteria for Initiation of Rugby Progression
Absence of swelling or joint effusion |
---|
Full, pain-free PROM and AROM symmetrical to contralateral extremity |
Adequate baseline extremity and core strength
|
Key: PROM = passive range of motion; AROM = active range of motion; MMT = manual muscle testing; HHD = hand held dynamometry
Pain frequently contributes to diminished strength and coordination output following an initial injury, which necessitates emphasis on neuromuscular control and strength during the initial phases of rehabilitation.11,12 Once the athlete has begun to develop sufficient strength, he or she may then begin to practice loading, landing, and deceleration mechanics. Neuromuscular control with these movement strategies are promoted using drills such as lunges, single limb squats, small bounding hops in the sagittal plane progressing to the frontal plane, and drop box landings. Verbal and visual feedback is vital to assist with the athlete's success, and these cues have been proven to alter an athlete's movement strategy.10,13,14 An anti-gravity treadmill or aquatic environment may assist in unloading the athlete's weight while respecting physiological healing and decreasing the overall demand placed on the lower extremities.
Prior to the return to sport progression, a progressive running tolerance program on level surfaces should be initiated when appropriate. As the athlete begins to demonstrate improved strength and appropriate neuromuscular control, he or she may initiate more advanced strength training. These may include, but are not limited to, Olympic weightlifting derivatives, such as squats, deadlifts, power cleans, and Romanian deadlifts. It is also important to include triple extension strength, and power development, utilizing bungee cords or cables for increased time under tension.
The authors’ recommended testing elements for demonstration of movement normalization are contained in Table 2. The Y-Balance Test™ is a measurement of single limb balance and motor control, that has been validated in the literature, most notably with regards to injury risk assessment.15-17 The authors recommend the use of this test to ensure the returning athlete demonstrate the requisite single limb stability of at least 90% when compared to the contralateral lower extremity. The single leg bridge and single leg squat are other excellent assessments for core stability and appropriate gluteal musculature function and strength. Weakness in the core and hip muscle groups have been identified as risk factors for lower extremity injury risk.18-21 Altered lower extremity mechanics18,22 due to the effects of proximal lower extremity muscle weakness have been significantly correlated with lower extremity pathologies such as iliotibial band syndrome,23 patellofemoral pain syndrome,24-26 and ankle sprains.27 In order to identify gluteal muscle activation deficits, a single leg bridge can be a useful assessment. During a single leg bridge, the athlete often demonstrates a functional gluteal deficit with overcompensation from the hamstring muscle group. In addition, trunk rotation or a contralateral pelvic drop during a single leg bridge can assist with identification of deficits in core stability. The single leg squat has been proven to identify core strength26,28 and has been correlated with landing, running, and cutting tasks.29-32 Athletes often demonstrate increased trunk displacement, contralateral pelvic drop, hip adduction, and valgus collapse26,33-38 during this maneuver, which are indicative of deficits in postural stability and proximal hip muscle function.26,39-42 In addition, the single leg squat test has been utilized to screen for residual deficits in core stability and hip abduction strength in baseball players returning from shoulder injury.40,43
Table 2.
Testing Elements for Demonstration of Movement Normalization
Y-Balance Test™
|
5 single leg bridges with a 10 second isometric hold performed at the top of the movement
|
1 minute single leg squats to depth of 40-60 ° of knee flexion
|
Running tolerance
|
As the athlete continues to develop strength and power capacity, a progressive plyometric-based program should be incorporated. It is imperative that the athlete demonstrate appropriate eccentric control with landing or deceleration during various drills throughout treatment sessions. It has been well documented that lower extremity biomechanics and movement alterations have been correlated to injuries to the ACL.47-56 In a study analyzing biomechanical measures during landing, Paterno et al9 determined four factors that predispose an athlete to a second ACL injury in those who had previously undergone an ACL reconstruction. These predictive factors included increased knee valgus, asymmetry in knee extensor moment during initial contact, poor single limb postural stability, and decreased contralateral hip rotation strength (assessed using moment data). Clinicians should monitor players for these elements when performing plyometric interventions during rehabilitation. Plyometric activities have been shown to improve sprinting57 and agility58 performance. Vertical progressions should include depth jumps progressing to tuck jumps (adding rotation when appropriate) and box jumps of varying heights, with the athlete eventually progressing to single limb drills. Horizontal progressions should include line hops, slide board exercises, alternating single limb bounding, as well as single limb single and triple hops crossing over through multiple planes. During these horizontal progressions, the emphasis should be on achieving horizontal rather than vertical displacement in preparation for change of direction and agility drills.59
Change of direction and agility are important facets of rugby in order to evade tacklers and create an open field of play.59 An athlete's agility performance is strongly influenced by the ability to rapidly decelerate and reaccelerate while adjusting his or her momentum to either pursue or elude opponents.60 Team sport athletes are typically involved in change of direction events during sprints of approximately five meters.61 More specifically, Meir et al62 reported that rugby players typically come into contact with an opposing player at distances of 10 meters. Therefore, Delaney et al63 utilized the 505 test64 to analyze the contributing factors to change of direction ability of male professional rugby players. The authors concluded that the 505 test performed on the athletes’ dominant lower extremity was significantly correlated with the athletes’ linear sprint speed over a 40 meter distance. Performance of the 505 test on the non-dominant lower extremity was dependent upon relative strength and relative power (determined by a ratio of the player's three repetition maximum back squat and a 40 kilogram barbell squat jump, respectively, divided by the player's body mass). Other researchers who have analyzed change of direction and ability in rugby players have utilized tests involving thirty to forty-five degree cuts,59,65,66 which have been studied previously in observance with game situations.60,67-73
During change of direction maneuvers, an athlete uses their plant leg to decelerate his or her body from linear running prior to initiating the change of direction task. The athlete's push off leg then initiates acceleration of the body into the new desired direction.59 In a comparison of cutting technique performance of semiprofessional rugby players, Green et al59 calculated an average transition time from initial contact of the plant leg to toe off of the push off leg to be significantly shorter in starters versus nonstarters. McLean et al68 investigated the biomechanics of sidestep cutting using three-dimensional motion and ground reaction force analysis. After initial contact, anterior and inferior forces of the trunk produces average hip and knee flexion angles of 48.7 and 60.2 degrees, respectively, as well as an average knee valgus angle of 13.2 degrees. These measurements are similar to those calculations previously reported in the literature.69-71 During the addition of a simulated defensive opponent, athletes demonstrated an increase in hip flexion, knee flexion, and knee valgus angles.68
It is imperative that the athlete demonstrates proper technique during agility drills, such as planting with the outside leg, appropriate amount of knee flexion as mentioned previously, leaning into the cut, and full triple extension of the push off leg. Previous authors have reported that a more upright position with increased hip and knee extension at initial contact may correlate to an increased risk of lower extremity injury and may also hinder the athlete's proficiency in generating force to improve the resultant stride velocity after the change of direction task.68,74 The rehabilitating player should also begin to integrate movements that focus on footwork skill, such as agility ladder drills. As the athlete's footwork begins to return to normal, he or she may then progress to more challenging agility movements, such as the T drill75, box drills, and reactive linear and diagonal drills. A progression from proactive to reactive drills should be utilized as the intention of this progression is to prepare the athlete for reintegration into practice activities and noncontact drills with the team. Various testing elements are also useful to aid the clinician's decision to reintegrate the athlete back to practice, such as hop testing,76 40 meter sprints from the upright, prone, and rolling positions, as well as the L run77 and the Pro Agility Test.77
Once the athlete demonstrates the requisite requirements in preparation for returning to the practice field, he or she should begin a series of rugby-specific practice drills. To the authors’ knowledge, there is no available evidence for the following drill progression and the following are the authors’ recommendations based off similar research published for athletes of similar sports78,79 that have been adapted for the sport of rugby. These drills are commonly performed in conjunction with the coaching staff while the rehabilitation specialist monitors the returning athlete for any symptom provocation, abnormal movement patterns, performance decline, and psychological factors. Controlled movements with a teammate should be performed initially, such as forward runs with lateral passes within a fixed distance interval (typically 10 meters) followed by diagonal runs and switch passes. The athlete should focus on completing accurate passes rather than maximal effort. During the sport of rugby, passes may be completed directly horizontally or behind the passing player. Once this is effectively demonstrated, the athlete may progress to reactive agility drills beginning with the recovering athlete emulating the movements and changes in the direction of a teammate within a boxed area. The athlete should begin with linear movements before progressing to diagonal and multi-planar movements. Once competence is demonstrated with reactive agility maneuvers, the clinician may then allow scrimmage situations beginning with small-sided games of touch rugby. Reintegration into competitive match play should be accomplished in small increments. Again, the athlete should be monitored for any symptom provocation, abnormal movement patterns, performance decline, and psychological factors. Progressions for other specific aspects of game play, such as lineouts, kicking, scrummaging, and tackling are covered in the next section of this commentary.
POSITION SPECIFIC PROGRESSIONS
Lineout Progression
The purpose of a lineout is to restart game play quickly, safely, and fairly after the ball has left the field of play. The lineout involves a throw-in of the rugby ball between two lines of players (one line from each team) spaced at one meter apart, usually at the exact place where the ball went out of play. The throw in a lineout is usually between 5 and 15 meters in distance80 and is normally executed overhead with two hands (with or without a step forward) with the ball being spun about its longitudinal axis (Figures 1a and 1b).80
Figure 1.
Lineout sequence, a) Two lines of players from each team are evenly spaced with the thrower preparing to execute an overhead throw, b) Jumpers are hoisted by their teammates in preparation to catch the ball as it is thrown directly down the center of the two lines.
The jumpers (locks) are typically hoisted by one or two lifters (props; typically the strongest members of the team) in order for the jumper to intercept the ball at a height of 3 to 3.5 meters.45,80,81 Initially, the weight of the jumper is usually shared equally during the lift, but then is transferred toward the rear lifter. Once the ball is caught, the lifter releases his or her teammate resulting in a landing, for the jumper, from a height of 1 to 1.5 meters.81 Each of the different positions in a lineout requires very different demands and varied stresses placed on the player's body, requiring special attention during the middle and end phases of rehabilitation as the player prepares to return to game play.
Specific requirements for lineout drills will vary for lifters or props, jumpers (locks), and throwers (usually the hooker). For lifters or props, it is essential that they have full shoulder and elbow range of motion and strength. They must demonstrate the requisite core strength and control required to produce enough power to lift jumpers from the ground to a height of 1 to 1.5 meters.45,80,81 Jumpers (locks) must demonstrate excellent core strength and stability in an upright position, especially on unstable surfaces. They must also demonstrate the ability to safely land from a height of one meter with safe and quick transitions upon landing.45,80,81 Throwers must have full shoulder mobility and must demonstrate adequate core strength in order to produce power when throwing overhead. They also must demonstrate the ability to accurately throw the rugby ball to the jumper between 5 and 18 meters away.80 Specifically, the thrower must demonstrate adequate shoulder flexion, medial rotation, elbow flexion and supination, followed quickly by shoulder extension, lateral rotation, elbow extension, and pronation during the completion of the throw.80,81 This motion demands full glenohumeral and scapulothoracic motion, as well as adequate thoracic spine mobility, specifically thoracic extension.
Lineout Drills
Lifters: In order to adequately prepare lifters for the demands of a lineout, proper progression of strength and conditioning must be employed with a specific focus on power and triple extension drills. This can be accomplished via kettle bell swings and high-load lower extremity lifts including squats, deadlifts, snatches, cleans, and clean and jerk exercises. A useful drill for these players utilizes a tackle bag to mimic the weight and size of the jumper, ideally with the majority of weight at the top of the object being lifted.81
Jumpers: Jumpers have multiple roles in a lineout and will have different sport requirements that need to be addressed in the clinic prior to returning to full gameplay. In order to prepare jumpers for the landing aspect of a lineout, drills involving progressive drop jumps up to 1.5 meters high must be performed with good lumbopelvic, knee, and ankle control.81 These drills should also address landing on unstable surfaces and should incorporate quick transitions, such as landing followed by cutting or sprinting immediately afterwards. Lastly, the drills should incorporate catching or deflecting the rugby ball followed by a safe landing from a height of 1.5 meters.81 Catching progressions should begin with chest level drills and then progress towards overhead catches and deflections. These drills should initially be performed on stable surfaces before transitioning to unstable surfaces in order to challenge core stability in a similar fashion to catching and/or deflecting the ball while being lifted. Drills should be progressed from proactive drills with a known pattern (such as ball toss to a rebounder) to reactive drills, which involve unknown patterns (such as perturbation training while catching and clinician throwing the ball in different positions and locations to stress reaction to stimulus).82 Core stability is another major focus during rehabilitation for preparation of a jumper in their return to safely performing lineouts. These drills should begin in the sagittal plane before incorporating exercises in the transverse plane. Drills should also include quick transitions from catching to throwing with arms overhead, beginning with stable and progressing towards increasingly unstable positions and surfaces. A typical progression of positions includes kneeling to half kneeling, then to standing, and finally to single leg stance.
Throwers: Players that may be placed in the throwing position for a lineout must demonstrate safe and effective lower extremity mechanics during a progressive throwing program. Throwing drills should start with chest passes then progress to overhead passes. Throwing should start with short distances and progress up to at least 18 meters. Target training should be incorporated to promote accuracy and proprioception. This can be accomplished with use of a target that is held at the approximate height of a jumper (approximately 3 to 3.5 meters high).81 A small medicine ball or weighted rugby ball can also be used for target training to gradually increase demands in a safe environment prior to implementing on-field drills.81
Section testing elements for return to lineouts include the ability to perform all position-specific lineout requirements as detailed above. Tolerance to intensity should be evaluated by maximal effort in the clinic with drills that closely simulate the position played without symptom provocation, as well as full game play without symptom provocation.
KICKING PROGRESSION
Despite its fundamental role in the game of rugby, frequency and demands of kicking in the sport of rugby are poorly documented.81 Kicking is an essential skill for backs and must be addressed before the player is fully released to play.81 In the game of rugby, kicking (Figures 2a and 2b) can be performed out of hand, from a kicking tee (i.e. goal kick or place kick), or from the ground (i.e. drop goal).83 The goal or place kick can be performed toe end style (player approaches the ball straight on and kicks the ball using the toe of the boot) or instep style (player approaches the ball from an angle and kicks the ball with his/her instep). Game play begins with a kick off, either a place kick or a drop kick, from the center of the halfway line. The ball must travel at least 10 meters from the point of kickoff.83 A drop kick from the halfway line will also restart the game after a penalty or drop goal has been scored.83
Figure 2.
Kicking, a) Kick performed from a tee, performed after a try or penalty, b) Drop kick performed using an instep style.
Players who are expected to perform goal kicks or place kicks must be able to demonstrate a long-lasting oscillation with hip extension and maximum knee flexion during the backswing, followed by hip flexion with knee extension.84 Specific joint requirements for the kicking leg include at least 100 ° of knee flexion and 10 °-15 ° of hip extension during the backswing, followed by 50 ° of hip flexion and 60 ° of knee flexion at ball impact.84 The player must also be able to demonstrate a rigid foot with full ankle plantarflexion and toe flexion at ball contact. The forward swing demands at least 120 ° of hip flexion with 20 ° of knee flexion and the player must demonstrate adequate hamstring length and eccentric hamstring strength to avoid injury with high kicks.84 For the non-kicking leg, adequate single leg balance and proprioception are essential for safe performance of kicking requirements during game play. Control and accuracy must be stressed with all kicking drills, and the player must demonstrate adequate hamstring length and eccentric hamstring strength to avoid injury with high kicks.
Kicking drills should begin with short distances with a focus on control and kicking mechanics, and gradually progress to longer distances with greater velocity.78 Players should start by holding the ball in their hands and performing drop kicks at short distances into netting in the clinic. Once they have mastered this skill without pain or difficulty, they can progress to goal or place kicks with a tee. Prior to performing the goal kick, ensure the athlete is able to perform the proper approach and dry kicks in the clinic without aggravation of symptoms. Once they have demonstrated proper mechanics without compensations, they can add the ball and progress from short to long distances.
Section testing elements for return to kicking include the ability to perform full intensity kicks (at least 5-10 kicks in a row) in the clinic without symptom provocation, as well as full game play without symptom provocation.
SCRUM PROGRESSION
The purpose of the scrum is to restart play quickly, safely, and fairly after a minor infringement or stoppage. It is composed of eight players, typically forwards, who bind together to form a cohesive pack, first with each other and then against an opposing pack to compete for possession of the ball as it is rolled by the scrum half between the resultant tunnel that separates the two teams (Figures 3a and 3b).85 Each scrum is composed of three units or rows: the front row (two props with a hooker between them), the second row (also referred to as locks), two flankers, and a number 8. Tight forwards include the two props, the hooker, and the two locks. Loose forwards include the two flankers and the number 8. In a sample of professional rugby players an average of 29 ± 6 scrums occurred per game with a mean duration of 5.8 ± 0.5 seconds per scrum.45
Figure 3.
Front row of the scrum, a) composed of a hooker between two props, b) Scrum half preparing to roll the ball between 2 full scrum packs.
Relative to the incidence of other injuries that occur during the sport, scrum-related injuries are reportedly very small, typically cited at an average of less than 8% of all reported injuries sustained during game play.5,86-89 However, the scrum is correlated with the highest risk per event for injury, in addition to the most days lost per event when compared to all contact events that occur during rugby.90 Catastrophic injuries occurring during the scrum are not uncommon and have been reported to be as high as 40% of all reported catastrophic injuries.91-93 While the incidence of these injuries is low, they have the propensity to cause debilitating acute or chronic injury.92,94-97 Injury mechanisms of spinal injuries occurring from the scrum are typically classified as either hyperflexion or buckling,85 which may cause acute cervical root injuries during matches or the repeated cumulative stresses in the same manner may contribute to lumbar disc injuries.94
Multiple studies have investigated the biomechanics and force production of rugby scrummaging.98-102 Preatoni et al99 utilized an instrumented scrum machine to analyze the biomechanical demands of scrummaging. During the scrum, there is a characteristic force pattern that includes a short-duration peak at impact, a sharp decrease in force to its lowest level, followed by a steady escalation to an overall steady-state sustained force. Peak engagement forces ranged from 8700 to 16500 Newtons. When forces were normalized by total body weight amongst the scrum packs, there were no discrepancies in peak engagement force between genders or age level, except for international and elite players.
During the scrum, players must bind to a teammate using their entire upper extremity from shoulder to hand in order to grasp a teammate's body at or below the level of the axilla, which typically requires at least 90 degrees of shoulder horizontal abduction.103 Due to their position between two props on either side, the hooker requires greater shoulder range of motion and greater end range shoulder strength to maintain this suspended position during the scrum. Isometric cervical strength is especially important for those in the front row due to the forces described previously for adequate stabilization of the cervical spine.
Amongst the props for each team there exists a loose head prop, who is only bound to the opponent's scrum by his inside shoulder, and a tight head prop, who is bound to the opponent's scrum between the opposing hooker and loose head prop. Requirements for the tight head prop will be greater than those for their loose head counterpart due to the more constricted and thus more vulnerable position. Players involved in the scrum must also be able to tolerate the physical demands of the crouched position. According to Quarrie et al103 the range of motion requirements for scrummaging include 123 degrees of hip flexion, 107 degrees of knee flexion, and 12 degrees of ankle dorsiflexion.
Scrummaging requires dedicated strength training in the weight room for both the upper and lower extremities in addition to core stability, such as those listed in Table 3 and shown in Figures 4a- 4h. Emphasis should be placed on those exercises simulating the crouched position required for the scrum. In addition, promotion of triple extension should not be neglected, as lower extremity power production as a cohesively bound unit is essential for driving the scrum pack forward against a resisting opponent.
Table 3.
Strength Drills for Scrummaging and Tackling: perform 3x/week with at least 1 rest day in between
Upper Body Strength
|
Core Stability
|
Lower Extremity Power
|
Figure 4.
(a-h). Strength drills for scrimmaging: a) Resisted prone cervical extension over bench, b) Chest fly with dumbbells, c) Reverse fly with dumbbells, d) Horizontal row with dumbbells, e) Half kneeling press with lateral cable, f) Quadruped upper extremity flexion with contralateral lower extremity extension over ball, g) Side plank with shoulder abduction, h) Posterolateral upper extremity slide.
In addition, players attempting to return to scrummaging should do so in a functional progression (Table 4). It is encouraged that the clinician gradually incorporate simulated opponents before finally advancing to a full scrum (Figures 5a, 5b, 5c). A player may return to scrummaging in a competitive environment when he or she demonstrates the ability to perform full intensity scrummaging in practice with all eight forwards.
Table 4.
Field Progressions for Scrummaging
Without a partner (begin with 5-10 second bouts and gradually increase to 30 second bouts)
|
With one partner/opponent (must be able to tolerate positions for 20-30 seconds at a time
|
Sequential scrum transitions (perform progressions on separate days to ensure tolerance; begin with 5-10 minutes of practice time and allow progression if no pain reproduction)
|
Figure 5.
Field progressions for scrummaging performed with a partner, a) Binding for positional tolerance, b) Players performing squat in bound position, c) Rotations performed from bound position.
TACKLING, RUCKING, MAULING PROGRESSION
Tackling
Tackling is an essential component of the sport of rugby, and emphasis on proper technique should begin as early as possible in a player's career given that players are expected to develop and withstand tremendous forces without injuring themselves or others. A tackle is technically defined as an event that occurs on the field of play during which the ball carrier is held by one or more opponents, and either the ball or the hand of the arm carrying the ball makes contact with the ground. An average of 590 ± 50 completed tackles and an average of 67 ± 14 missed tackles per player occurred in a study investigating a professional New Zealand rugby team over two seasons.104 In a two-season prospective cohort of 645 professional rugby union players from 13 English Premiership rugby union clubs, the flanker completed the highest number of tackles per match amongst all positions, with an average of 13 ± 6.90 However, the frequency of being tackled was not significantly different between all positions.45
With regards to injury, previous reports amongst senior and elite rugby players revealed that the most prevalent cause of injury was the tackle (24-58%), followed by the ruck (6-17%), and then the maul (12-16%).5,86,89,105-109 In a prospective cohort of 645 professional rugby players followed over two seasons, the most common injuries sustained during collision events were thigh muscle hematomas, head/facial fractures, knee and foot/ankle ligament injuries during the maul, calf muscle hematomas and foot/ankle ligament injuries during the ruck, shoulder ligament injuries and concussions while tackling, and thigh muscle hematomas and knee ligament injuries while being tackled.90 Not surprisingly, ball carriers sustain more injuries to their lower rather than upper limb, while the opposite is true for the tackler.104
The requirements for tackling are nearly identical to those for scrummaging. However, players are required to develop more power in a less controlled and more dynamic environment. Intuitively, those players who approach a contact situation with the greatest momentum typically produce the largest peak force during impact.110 Strength and conditioning drills to be performed prior to a player's return to tackling are outlined in Table 3.
As mentioned in the Scrum Progression section, grip strength is essential for the sport of rugby, as tacklers are required to pin their opponents to the ground before the phase is concluded. Therefore, suggested progressive grappling drills are essential to an athlete's successful return to competition. These drills may be performed by the clinician, a teammate, or a member of the coaching staff in an open area in the clinic or on the field. Beginning in a tall kneeling position the athlete should practice binding head on and then progressing to the side and from behind. Once this is completed, the athlete may begin to practice binding from a standing position utilizing the same intensity progression (Figure 6). For positional tolerance, the athlete should practice a stationary grapple to ensure proper positioning and absence of symptoms. Following this, the athlete should begin to bind before walking forward and then backwards while maintaining this bound position. Once this has been accomplished, the athlete should perform clockwise and counterclockwise circles while bound to an opponent. To challenge the returning player's reaction ability, the opponent may then change directions with an attempt to shake the athlete off. In an effort to simulate the dynamic nature and duration of a tackle the athlete may then begin practicing an explosive initial contact with an opponent. This initial contact may then be followed by a resisted drive against an opponent with a final progression towards shaking off an opponent before the addition of a sprint.
Figure 6.
Tackle performed against a standing opponent.
Once this progression is successfully completed without symptom provocation, the athlete may advance to drills performed on the field. All field tackling drills should be executed in a gradually progressive fashion. It is the authors’ recommendation to begin initially at 25% intensity prior to progressing to 50%, 75%, and finally 100% intensity as tolerated. It has been previously reported that fatigue can decrease an athlete's neuromuscular control, performance, and lower extremity mechanics.111-120 Additionally, Gabbett121 reported a decrease in rugby players’ tackling ability in addition to other performance elements as exercise intensity increased, resulting in a progressively fatigued state. If available, it is recommended that a tackling dummy or shield be utilized preceding a live opponent. Forwards are typically involved in tackling from a shorter distance, whereas backs are commonly involved in more open-field tackling events at greater velocities.81 Therefore, in an effort to closely correlate position-specific demands, the distances should be varied accordingly. In addition, tackles should be performed at a variety of angles to mimic the assorted demands required during gameplay.
In an effort to mimic the reactive ability and on-field decision making required for tackling, three cones should be set up to create two running lanes for an opponent. An opponent is instructed to sprint towards the cones before finally choosing one of the two lanes to run through before being bound by the recovering athlete from a standing position. The athlete's position is then transitioned to prone facing the opponent before transitioning to prone facing away from the opponent. This sequence should then be progressed from binding to tackling utilizing the previously mentioned graduated advancement of intensity. Gabbett121 lists the following as technical criteria for proficient tackling in rugby, “accelerating into the contact zone; contacting the target in the center of gravity; contact the target with the opposite shoulder to leading leg; body position square/aligned; arms wrapping around the target on contact; leg drive on contact; watching the target onto the shoulder; and center of gravity forward of base of support”. 121, p. 626. Once the athlete is able to demonstrate proficient technique from a rested state, he or she should then be evaluated using a repeated-effort protocol in order to induce fatigue.121
Rucking is a common event occurring immediately following a tackle in which a player is effectively pinned to the ground and the tackled player places the ball on the ground (Figures 7a and 7b). The site where the ball is placed demarcates the area of possession for the offensive team. Players from both teams form opposing forces in an attempt to either maintain or gain possession utilizing various strategies and techniques, typically involving a charge leading with the shoulder. Amongst 13 professional teams, an average of 142.5 rucks occurred per match.90 Although any player may participate in a ruck, the forwards are typically involved more frequently than the backs.45
Figure 7.
A player placing the ball after being tackled, b) Players from both sides form a ruck to compete for possession of the ball.
A maul is formed if the ball carrier is unable to be successfully pinned to the ground and at least one opponent and one bound teammate hold the ball carrier upright. The play must continue to move towards a goal line and may not remain stationary for more than five seconds. An average of 18.4 mauls have been reported to occur in an individual professional match.90 The requirements for rucking and mauling are nearly identical to those required for scrummaging. However, rucks require more power development in a less controlled and more dynamic environment than scrummaging. In addition, mauling requires power development while the athlete maintains a more upright position. Forwards participate in an average of 3.2 times more rucks and mauls combined than backs.45
A useful drill for the recovering player is to simulate a player using a tackle bag by laying the bag on the ground to simulate a ruck or upright to simulate a maul. The player then charges towards the bag in an attempt to “clear” the ruck or advance the maul. Tackling shields may be used to simulate opposing players initially before progressing to live opponents. As the player is able to demonstrate competence with these drills, the intensity and angle of the charge may be manipulated further. Return to full gameplay should be done so in conjunction with successful completion of the other aspects of gameplay in which he or she is involved as discussed in the previous sections of this commentary.
CONCLUSION
As evidenced by the detailed proposed guidelines, the sport of rugby places very specific and unique demands on the body when returning a rugby player to full participation. Rehabilitation may be tailored to the position played, the level of the athlete, and the type and involvement of the injury. The intention of this proposed program is to provide a general outline for rehabilitation specialists to utilize for rugby players during rehabilitation that takes into account the unique aspects of functional performance and return to sport phases in order to prepare an athlete for return to full gameplay. It also provides educational components on general gameplay, testing components, suggested specific movement progressions, and sport- and position-specific progressions. Prior to initiation of this return to sport program, all athletes should demonstrate achievement of the baseline requirements in order to decrease risk of re-injury and to ensure safe and efficient return to sport.
REFERENCES
- 1.O’Connor D. Groin injuries in professional rugby league players: a prospective study. J Sports Sci. 2004;22(7):629-636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.King DA Gabbett TJ Dreyer C Gerrard DF. Incidence of injuries in the New Zealand national rugby league sevens tournament. J Sci Med Sport. 2006;9(1-2):110-118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brooks JH Kemp SP. Recent trends in rugby union injuries. Clin Sports Med. 2008;27(1):51-73, vii-viii. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dallalana RJ Brooks JH Kemp SP Williams AM. The epidemiology of knee injuries in English professional rugby union. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(5):818-830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brooks JH Fuller CW Kemp SP Reddin DB. Epidemiology of injuries in English professional rugby union: part 1 match injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(10):757-766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brooks JH Fuller CW Kemp SP Reddin DB. Epidemiology of injuries in English professional rugby union: part 2 training Injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(10):767-775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cook G Burton L Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006;1(2):62-72. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lisman P O’Connor FG Deuster PA Knapik JJ. Functional movement screen and aerobic fitness predict injuries in military training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(4):636-643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Paterno MV Schmitt LC Ford KR, et al. Biomechanical measures during landing and postural stability predict second anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(10):1968-1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hewett TE Ford KR Myer GD. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes: Part 2, a meta-analysis of neuromuscular interventions aimed at injury prevention. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(3):490-498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hodges PW Tucker K. Moving differently in pain: a new theory to explain the adaptation to pain. Pain. 2011;152(3 Suppl):S90-98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tucker K Larsson AK Oknelid S Hodges P. Similar alteration of motor unit recruitment strategies during the anticipation and experience of pain. Pain. 2012;153(3):636-643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Myer GD Ford KR McLean SG Hewett TE. The effects of plyometric versus dynamic stabilization and balance training on lower extremity biomechanics. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(3):445-455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Myer GD Chu DA Brent JL Hewett TE. Trunk and hip control neuromuscular training for the prevention of knee joint injury. Clin Sports Med. 2008;27(3):425-448, ix. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Plisky PJ Gorman PP Butler RJ Kiesel KB Underwood FB Elkins B. The reliability of an instrumented device for measuring components of the star excursion balance test. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2009;4(2):92-99. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Plisky PJ Rauh MJ Kaminski TW Underwood FB. Star Excursion Balance Test as a predictor of lower extremity injury in high school basketball players. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(12):911-919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Boyle MJ Butler RJ Queen RM. Functional Movement Competency and Dynamic Balance After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36(1):36-41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Powers CM. The influence of abnormal hip mechanics on knee injury: a biomechanical perspective. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(2):42-51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Davis IS Powers CM. Patellofemoral pain syndrome: proximal, distal, and local factors, an international retreat, April 30-May 2, 2009, Fells Point, Baltimore, MD. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(3):A1-16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Leetun DT Ireland ML Willson JD Ballantyne BT Davis IM. Core stability measures as risk factors for lower extremity injury in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(6):926-934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ireland ML Willson JD Ballantyne BT Davis IM. Hip strength in females with and without patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(11):671-676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Reiman MP Bolgla LA Lorenz D. Hip functions influence on knee dysfunction: a proximal link to a distal problem. J Sport Rehabil. 2009;18(1):33-46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fredericson M Cookingham CL Chaudhari AM Dowdell BC Oestreicher N Sahrmann SA. Hip abductor weakness in distance runners with iliotibial band syndrome. Clin J Sport Med. 2000;10(3):169-175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Finnoff JT Hall MM Kyle K Krause DA Lai J Smith J. Hip strength and knee pain in high school runners: a prospective study. PM R. 2011;3(9):792-801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Prins MR van der Wurff P. Females with patellofemoral pain syndrome have weak hip muscles: a systematic review. Aust J Physiother. 2009;55(1):9-15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nakagawa TH Moriya ET Maciel CD Serrão FV. Trunk pelvis, hip, and knee kinematics hip strength, and gluteal muscle activation during a single-leg squat in males and females with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(6):491-501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Friel K McLean N Myers C Caceres M. Ipsilateral hip abductor weakness after inversion ankle sprain. J Athl Train. 2006;41(1):74-78. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Okada T Huxel KC Nesser TW. Relationship between core stability, functional movement, and performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(1):252-261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stensrud S Myklebust G Kristianslund E Bahr R Krosshaug T. Correlation between two-dimensional video analysis and subjective assessment in evaluating knee control among elite female team handball players. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(7):589-595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Claiborne TL Armstrong CW Gandhi V Pincivero DM. Relationship between hip and knee strength and knee valgus during a single leg squat. J Appl Biomech. 2006;22(1):41-50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Willson JD Ireland ML Davis I. Core strength and lower extremity alignment during single leg squats. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(5):945-952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zeller BL McCrory JL Kibler WB Uhl TL. Differences in kinematics and electromyographic activity between men and women during the single-legged squat. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(3):449-456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Alentorn-Geli E Myer GD Silvers HJ et al. Prevention of non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer players. Part 1: Mechanisms of injury and underlying risk factors. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(7):705-729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Brent JL Myer GD Ford KR Paterno MV Hewett TE. The effect of sex and age on isokinetic hip-abduction torques. J Sport Rehabil. 2013;22(1):41-46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Frank B Bell DR Norcross MF Blackburn JT Goerger BM Padua DA. Trunk and hip biomechanics influence anterior cruciate loading mechanisms in physically active participants. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(11):2676-2683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hewett TE Myer GD. The mechanistic connection between the trunk, hip, knee, and anterior cruciate ligament injury. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2011;39(4):161-166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jacobs CA Uhl TL Mattacola CG Shapiro R Rayens WS. Hip abductor function and lower extremity landing kinematics: sex differences. J Athl Train. 2007;42(1):76-83. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Stearns KM Powers CM. Improvements in hip muscle performance result in increased use of the hip extensors and abductors during a landing task. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(3):602-609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Boren K Conrey C Le Coguic J Paprocki L Voight M Robinson TK. Electromyographic analysis of gluteus medius and gluteus maximus during rehabilitation exercises. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2011;6(3):206-223. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Crossley KM Zhang WJ Schache AG Bryant A Cowan SM. Performance on the single-leg squat task indicates hip abductor muscle function. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(4):866-873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kivlan BR Martin RL. Functional performance testing of the hip in athletes: a systematic review for reliability and validity. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(4):402-412. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lubahn AJ Kernozek TW Tyson TL Merkitch KW Reutemann P Chestnut JM. Hip muscle activation and knee frontal plane motion during weight bearing therapeutic exercises. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2011;6(2):92-103. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Limpisvasti O ElAttrache NS Jobe FW. Understanding shoulder and elbow injuries in baseball. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15(3):139-147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Reid LC Cowman JR Green BS Coughlan GF. Return to play in elite rugby union: application of global positioning system technology in return-to-running programs. J Sport Rehabil. 2013;22(2):122-129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Eaton C George K. Position specific rehabilitation for rugby union players. Part I: Empirical movement analysis data Physical Therapy in Sport. 2006;7:22-29. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Deutsch MU Kearney GA Rehrer NJ. Time - motion analysis of professional rugby union players during match-play. J Sports Sci. 2007;25(4):461-472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.de Fontenay BP Argaud S Blache Y Monteil K. Motion alterations after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of the injured and uninjured lower limbs during a single-legged jump. J Athl Train. 2014;49(3):311-316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Orishimo KF Kremenic IJ Mullaney MJ McHugh MP Nicholas SJ. Adaptations in single-leg hop biomechanics following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(11):1587-1593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Castanharo R da Luz BS Bitar AC D’Elia CO Castropil W Duarte M. Males still have limb asymmetries in multijoint movement tasks more than 2 years following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sci. 2011;16(5):531-535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Decker MJ Torry MR Noonan TJ Riviere A Sterett WI. Landing adaptations after ACL reconstruction. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(9):1408-1413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ernst GP Saliba E Diduch DR Hurwitz SR Ball DW. Lower extremity compensations following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Ther. 2000;80(3):251-260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Paterno MV Ford KR Myer GD Heyl R Hewett TE. Limb asymmetries in landing and jumping 2 years following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin J Sport Med. 2007;17(4):258-262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ortiz A Olson S Trudelle-Jackson E Rosario M Venegas HL. Landing mechanics during side hopping and crossover hopping maneuvers in noninjured women and women with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. PM R. 2011;3(1):13-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lee SP Chow JW Tillman MD. Persons with reconstructed ACL exhibit altered knee mechanics during high-speed maneuvers. Int J Sports Med. 2014;35(6):528-533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Stearns KM Pollard CD. Abnormal frontal plane knee mechanics during sidestep cutting in female soccer athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(4):918-923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kuenze C Hertel J Weltman A Diduch DR Saliba S Hart JM. Jogging biomechanics after exercise in individuals with ACL-reconstructed knees. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(6):1067-1076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Rimmer E G S. Effects of a plyometric intervention program on sprint performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2000;14:295-301. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Thomas K French D Hayes PR. The effect of two plyometric training techniques on muscular power and agility in youth soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(1):332-335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Green BS Blake C Caulfield BM. A comparison of cutting technique performance in rugby union players. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(10):2668-2680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Spiteri T Hart NH Nimphius S. Offensive and defensive agility: a sex comparison of lower body kinematics and ground reaction forces. J Appl Biomech. 2014;30(4):514-520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Barnes JL Schilling BK Falvo MJ Weiss LW Creasy AK Fry AC. Relationship of jumping and agility performance in female volleyball athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(4):1192-1196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Meir R Newton R Curtis E Fardell M Butler B. Physical fitness qualities of professional rugby league football players: determination of positional differences. J Strength Cond Res. 2001;15(4):450-458. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Delaney JA Scott TJ Ballard DA, et al. Contributing Factors to Change-of-Direction Ability in Professional Rugby League Players. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(10):2688-2696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.JA D MG L. The 505 test: A test for agility in the horizontal plane. Aust J Sci Med Sport. 1985;17:15-18. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Green BS Blake C Caulfield BM. A valid field test protocol of linear speed and agility in rugby union. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(5):1256-1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Baker DG Newton RU. Comparison of lower body strength, power, acceleration, speed, agility, and sprint momentum to describe and compare playing rank among professional rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22(1):153-158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Spiteri T Cochrane JL Hart NH Haff GG Nimphius S. Effect of strength on plant foot kinetics and kinematics during a change of direction task. Eur J Sport Sci. 2013;13(6):646-652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.McLean SG Lipfert SW van den Bogert AJ. Effect of gender and defensive opponent on the biomechanics of sidestep cutting. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(6):1008-1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Malinzak RA Colby SM Kirkendall DT Yu B Garrett WE. A comparison of knee joint motion patterns between men and women in selected athletic tasks. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001;16(5):438-445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.McLean SG Neal RJ Myers PT Walters MR. Knee joint kinematics during the sidestep cutting maneuver: potential for injury in women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31(7):959-968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Neptune RR Wright IC van den Bogert AJ. Muscle coordination and function during cutting movements. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31(2):294-302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Chaouachi A Brughelli M Chamari K, et al. Lower limb maximal dynamic strength and agility determinants in elite basketball players. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(5):1570-1577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Chaouachi A Manzi V Chaalali A Wong dP Chamari K Castagna C. Determinants analysis of change-of-direction ability in elite soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(10):2667-2676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ford KR Myer GD Toms HE Hewett TE. Gender differences in the kinematics of unanticipated cutting in young athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(1):124-129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Semenick D. Test and measurements: The T- test. Nat Strength Cond Assoc J. 1990;12(1):36-37. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Reid A Birmingham TB Stratford PW Alcock GK Giffin JR. Hop testing provides a reliable and valid outcome measure during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Ther. 2007;87(3):337-349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Gabbett TJ Kelly JN Sheppard JM. Speed, change of direction speed, and reactive agility of rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22(1):174-181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Bizzini M Hancock D Impellizzeri F. Suggestions from the field for return to sports participation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: soccer. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(4):304-312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Verstegen M Falsone S Orr R Smith S. Suggestions from the field for return to sports participation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: American football. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(4):337-344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Sayers MG. Kinematic analysis of line-out throwing in elite international rugby union. J Sports Sci Med. 2011;10(3):553-558. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Eaton C George K. Position specific rehabilitation for rugby union players. Part II: Evidence-based examples. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2006;7:30-35. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Manske RC. Postsurgical Orthopedic Sports Rehabilitation: Knee and Shoulder. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, Inc.; 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 83.Padulo J Granatelli G Ruscello B D’ottavio S. The place kick in rugby. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2013;53(3):224-231. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Graham-Smith P Lees A. Chapter 29: Risk assessment of hamstring injury in rugby union place kicking. In: Spinks W Reilly T Murphy A, eds. Science and Football IV. New York, NY: Routledge; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Trewartha G Preatoni E England ME Stokes KA. Injury and biomechanical perspectives on the rugby scrum: a review of the literature. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(7):425-433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Bathgate A Best JP Craig G Jamieson M. A prospective study of injuries to elite Australian rugby union players. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36(4):265-269; discussion 269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Fuller CW Laborde F Leather RJ Molloy MG. International Rugby Board Rugby World Cup 2007 injury surveillance study. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42(6):452-459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Fuller CW Raftery M Readhead C, et al. Impact of the International Rugby Board's experimental law variations on the incidence and nature of match injuries in southern hemisphere professional rugby union. S Afr Med J 2009;99(4):232-7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Targett SG. Injuries in professional Rugby Union. Clin J Sport Med. 1998;8(4):280-285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Fuller CW Brooks JH Cancea RJ Hall J Kemp SP. Contact events in rugby union and their propensity to cause injury. Br J Sports Med. 2007;41(12):862-867; discussion 867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Fuller CW. Catastrophic injury in rugby union: is the level of risk acceptable? Sports Med. 2008;38(12):975-986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Quarrie KL Cantu RC Chalmers DJ. Rugby union injuries to the cervical spine and spinal cord. Sports Med. 2002;32(10):633-653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Brown JC Lambert MI Verhagen E Readhead C van Mechelen W Viljoen W. The incidence of rugby-related catastrophic injuries (including cardiac events) in South Africa from 2008 to 2011: a cohort study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Fuller CW Brooks JH Kemp SP. Spinal injuries in professional rugby union: a prospective cohort study. Clin J Sport Med. 2007;17(1):10-16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Maharaj JC Cameron ID. Increase in spinal injury among rugby union players in Fiji. Med J Aust. 1998;168(8):418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Rotem TR Lawson JS Wilson SF Engel S Rutkowski SB Aisbett CW. Severe cervical spinal cord injuries related to rugby union and league football in New South Wales, 1984-1996. Med J Aust. 1998;168(8):379-381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Taylor TK Coolican MR. Spinal-cord injuries in Australian footballers, 1960-1985. Med J Aust. 1987;147(3):112-113, 116-118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Milburn PD. The kinetics of rugby union scrummaging. J Sports Sci. 1990;1990(1):47-60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Preatoni E Stokes KA England ME Trewartha G. The influence of playing level on the biomechanical demands experienced by rugby union forwards during machine scrummaging. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013;23(3):e178-184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Rodano R Tosoni A. La mischia nel rugby. Milano: Edi Ermes s.r.l, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- 101.Du Toit DE Olivier PE Buys FJ. Kinetics of full scrum and staggered scrumengagement in under-19 schoolboy rugby union players. South Afr J Res Sport PhysEduc Recreation 2005;27:15–28. [Google Scholar]
- 102.Retiere D. Expérimentations simulateur de mêlée pole France. International Rugby Board Medical Conference; 4 November 2010; London, UK.
- 103.Quarrie KL Wilson BD. Force production in the rugby union scrum. J Sports Sci. 2000;2000(4):237-246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.King D Hume PA Clark T. Nature of tackles that result in injury in professional rugby league. Res Sports Med. 2012;2012(2):86-104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Lee AJ Garraway WM. Epidemiological comparison of injuries in school and senior club rugby. Br J Sports Med. 1996;1996(3):213-217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Bird YN Waller AE Marshall SW Alsop JC Chalmers DJ Gerrard DF. The New Zealand Rugby Injury and Performance Project: V. Epidemiology of a season of rugby injury. Br J Sports Med. 1998;1998(4):319-325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Bottini E Poggi EJ Luzuriaga F Secin FP. Incidence and nature of the most common rugby injuries sustained in Argentina (1991-1997). Br J Sports Med. 2000;2000(2):94-97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Brooks JH Fuller CW Kemp SP Reddin DB. A prospective study of injuries and training amongst the England 2003 Rugby World Cup squad. Br J Sports Med. 2005;2005(5):288-293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Best JP McIntosh AS Savage TN. Rugby World Cup 2003 injury surveillance project. Br J Sports Med. 2005;2005(11):812-817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Takarada Y. Evaluation of muscle damage after a rugby match with special reference to tackle plays. Br J Sports Med. 2003;2003(5):416-419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Johnston RB Howard ME Cawley PW Losse GM. Effect of lower extremity muscular fatigue on motor control performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;1998(12):1703-1707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.McLean SG Samorezov JE. Fatigue-induced ACL injury risk stems from a degradation in central control. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;2009(8):1661-1672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Borotikar BS Newcomer R Koppes R McLean SG. Combined effects of fatigue and decision making on female lower limb landing postures: central and peripheral contributions to ACL injury risk. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008;2008(1):81-92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Sugimoto D Alentorn-Geli E Mendiguchía J Samuelsson K Karlsson J Myer GD. Biomechanical and neuromuscular characteristics of male athletes: implications for the development of anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention programs. Sports Med. 2015;2015(6):809-822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Khalid AJ Harris SI Michael L Joseph H Qu X. Effects of neuromuscular fatigue on perceptual-cognitive skills between genders in the contribution to the knee joint loading during side-stepping tasks. J Sports Sci. 2015;2015(13):1322-1331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Gokeler A Eppinga P Dijkstra PU, et al. Effect of fatigue on landing performance assessed with the landing error scoring system (less) in patients after ACL reconstruction. A pilot study. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;2014(3):302-311. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Frank BS Gilsdorf CM Goerger BM Prentice WE Padua DA. Neuromuscular fatigue alters postural control and sagittal plane hip biomechanics in active females with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Health. 2014;2014(4):301-308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.De Ste Croix MB Priestley AM Lloyd RS Oliver JL. ACL injury risk in elite female youth soccer: Changes in neuromuscular control of the knee following soccer-specific fatigue. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(5):e531-538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Webster KE Santamaria LJ McClelland JA Feller JA. Effect of fatigue on landing biomechanics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;2012(5):910-916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Augustsson J Thomeé R Lindén C Folkesson M Tranberg R Karlsson J. Single-leg hop testing following fatiguing exercise: reliability and biomechanical analysis. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2006;2006(2):111-120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Gabbett TJ. Influence of fatigue on tackling technique in rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;2008(2):625-632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]