Abstract
As traditional antidepressants act only after weeks/months, the discovery that ketamine, an antagonist of glutamate/NMDA receptors, elicits antidepressant actions in hours has been transformative. Its mechanism of action has been elusive, though enhanced mTOR signaling is a major feature. We report a novel signaling pathway wherein NMDA receptor activation stimulates generation of nitric oxide (NO), which S-nitrosylates glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Nitrosylated GAPDH complexes with the ubiquitin-E3-ligase Siah1 and Rheb, a small G protein that activates mTOR. Siah1 degrades Rheb leading to reduced mTOR signaling, while ketamine, conversely, stabilizes Rheb which enhances mTOR signaling. Drugs selectively targeting components of this pathway may offer novel approaches to the treatment of depression.
Keywords: Ketamine, rapid antidepressants, mTOR, GAPDH S-nitrosylation, Rheb, Siah1
Introduction
A major limitation of antidepressant therapy with classical antidepressant drugs is the substantial lag of weeks – months before attaining therapeutic efficacy. Glutamatergic neurotransmission, especially the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) subtype of glutamate receptor, has been implicated in the pharmacotherapy of depression 1–7. The glutamate-NMDA receptor antagonist drug ketamine relieves clinical depressive symptoms in as little as two hours with therapeutic effects lasting for a period of weeks, a notable advance 8–14. Mechanisms underlying ketamine’s beneficial effects have been elusive. Duman and associates 15 reported that ketamine’s antidepressant actions reflect enhanced mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling. Thus, in animal models antidepressant effects of ketamine are reversed by the mTOR antagonist drug rapamycin as well as by inhibitors of protein kinases in the mTOR pathway, such as Akt and Erk 15. However, mechanisms whereby NMDA neurotransmission influences mTOR have not been established. One possibility might involve a pathway which we earlier elucidated whereby NMDA neurotransmission signals via nitric oxide (NO) to influence diverse intracellular events. Thus, NMDA transmission triggers the activation of neuronal NO synthase (nNOS) by eliciting cellular entry of calcium, which binds to and activates calmodulin associated with nNOS. The generated NO nitrosylates glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase (GAPDH) which in turn binds the ubiquitin-E3-ligase Siah1 16, 17. The Siah1-nitrosylated GAPDH complex translocates to the nucleus where, in response to apoptotic stimuli, it binds to the acetylating enzyme CREB-binding protein (CBP/p300) activating it and enhancing diverse cell death proteins 18. The signaling pathway can also exert trophic actions 19. Thus, neurotrophins also activate nNOS forming NO that nitrosylates GAPDH, which binds to Siah1 and translocates to the nucleus. In the nucleus the neurotrophin pathway differs from the apoptotic system by associating with the histone methylating enzyme Suppressor of Variegation 3–9 Homologue-1 (SUV39H1) in a ternary complex. In this complex, Siah1 ubiquitylates SUV39H1 and elicits its degradation. Loss of the methylating activity of SUV39H1 is associated with diminished methylation of histone-3 on lysine 9 thereby leading to increased acetylation of the histone which, in turn, activates CREB target genes and increases neuronal process growth.
The NO/GAPDH/Siah1 pathway has been elucidated by the use of the drug CGP3466B, an extremely potent inhibitor of GAPDH nitrosylation, acting at as little as 0.1 nM 20, 21. By inhibiting GAPDH nitrosylation CGP3466B prevents cytotoxicity associated with NO activation and hence is neuroprotective 20, 22, 23.
In the present study we have investigated mechanisms whereby the NO/GAPDH/Siah1 pathway interfaces with the small G protein Rheb to influence mTOR. Specifically, we show that nitroyslated GAPDH and Siah1 form a ternary complex with Rheb. Rheb is well established as the proximal stimulus to mTOR activation. In the GAPDH/Siah1/Rheb complex, the ubiquitin-E3-ligase activity of Siah1 leads to degradation of Rheb, which accordingly loses its ability to activate mTOR. Thus, NMDA signaling, acting through NO/GAPDH/Siah1, degrades Rheb and diminishes mTOR signaling. As an NMDA antagonist, ketamine reverses this process leading to the activation of mTOR and presumably accounting for the antidepressant actions of ketamine. Conceivably CGP3466B and other drugs that influence various steps in this pathway will provide novel approaches to the therapy of depression.
Materials and Methods
Reagents
Neurobasal-A medium (no glucose, no sodium pyruvate), B-27 supplement and B-27 supplement minus antioxidants were purchased from Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY). Clasto-lactacystin β-lactone (CLβL) and MG132 were purchased from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, Michigan). Deubiquitinase inhibitor bAP15 was purchased from Ubiquitin-Proteasome Biotechnologies (Aurora, CO). CGP3466B was purchased from Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, United Kingdom). Nω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), 7-nitroindazole, protein G plus-agarose and n-ethylmaleimide were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Paso Robles, CA). Ketamine hydrochloride was purchased from Spectrum Chemicals & Laboratory Products (Gardena, CA). N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) and Siah1 shRNA (verified) lentiviral plasmid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Rapamycin was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA).
Antibodies
Anti-GAPDH-HRP was purchased from GenScript USA Inc. (Piscataway, NJ). Anti-Rheb was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Paso Robles, CA). Anti-Siah1 was purchased from AbCam (Cambridge, MA). Anti-phospho-p70S6 Kinase (Thr389), anti-p70S6 Kinase, anti-beta-actin-HRP, anti-phospho-mTOR, anti-mTOR, anti-phospho-ASK, anti-ASK, anti-phospho-MKK4, anti-MKK4, anti-phospho-AMPK and anti-ubiquitin were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA). Anti-mono- and polyubiquitylated conjugates-HRP was purchased from Enzo Life Sciences (Farmingdale, NY). Anti-GST-HRP and Anti-HA-HRP were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
Transfections
HEK 293 cells transfections were performed using the polyfect transfection reagent following the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Valencia, CA).
Animals
All experiments involving animals were conducted in accordance with the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. Inducible nitric oxide synthase knockout (iNOS KO), neuronal nitric oxide synthase knockout (nNOS KO), C57Bl/6j adult and timed pregnant mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). CD-1 timed pregnant mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories. Animal handling and procedures were conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health guidelines for use of experimental animals and the Johns Hopkins animal care and use guidelines.
S-nitrosocysteine (CysNO) treatment
CysNO was prepared by mixing equimolar concentrations of l-cysteine and sodium nitrite. Then quickly using sodium hydroxide to bring the mixture into neutral pH. Freshly prepared CysNO was used immediately.
Immunoprecipitation (IP)
Cultured cells were washed in ice-cold PBS then harvested on ice in IP buffer containing: 10 mM sodium phosphate pH 7.2, 1% NP-40, 100 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM EDTA, 50 mM sodium fluoride, 200 μM sodium orthovanadate, 0.5 μg/ml antipain, 1 μg/ml leupeptin, 1 μg/ml aprotinin, 1 μg/ml chymostatin and 1 μg/ml pepstatin A. For ubiquitylation detection, deubiquitinase inhibitors: n-ethylmaleimide (NEM, 10 mM) and bAP15 (2 μM) were added to the IP buffer. Cell lysates were incubated on ice for 15 min then cleared by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. Equal amounts of total protein were incubated with the primary antibody for 1 hour at 4°C with rotation. Then, protein G plus agarose beads were added to the lysate-antibody mixture and rotated at 4°C for 1 hour. The beads were washed 5 times by series of centrifugation (at 735 × g) and resuspension using IP buffer. The beads were then resuspended in 1 X reducing SDS-loading buffer, boiled and pelleted by centrifugation. The supernatant was separated by western blot.
Primary cortical neurons (PCNs) culture
Unless otherwise specified, PCNs were isolated from E16-E18 pregnant CD-1 mice. The pregnant mouse was sacrificed by decapitation then the uterus was dissected out immediately. Working in sterile conditions, the uterus was opened, the pups were decapitated and their brains were dissected out and placed in dissection media containing DMEM/F12 1:1 supplanted with 10% horse serum. The cerebral cortices were detached from the rest of the brain then the meninges were removed. The cortices were incubated in 0.025% trypsin for 15 min at 37°C. The trypsin was washed with dissection media. The cortices were disrupted into single cell suspension by pipetting up and down 10 times then strained through a 40 μm sterile mesh. The single cell suspension was cultured in dissection media overnight. Then the media was replaced by PCNs plating media containing neurobasal-A medium (no glucose, no sodium pyruvate) supplemented with 12.5 mM glucose, 2 mM l-glutamine and 2% B-27. On day-4 in vitro (DIV4) the media was changed with PCNs maintenance media containing neurobasal-A medium (no glucose, no sodium pyruvate) supplemented with 12.5 mM glucose, 2 mM l-glutamine and 2% B-27 minus antioxidants. Every 3 days thereafter, 50% of the media was changed with PCNs maintenance media.
Forced swimming test (FST)
C57Bl/6j mice (12–16 weeks old) were subjected to FST 30 min after treatments. The mice were placed in a transparent glass cylinder (17.5 cm across) containing 20 cm deep-water at 25°C. The mice were videotaped for 6 min. The mice were euthanized after the test. The water was changed between subjects. The last 4 min were scored for freezing time in a blinded fashion. Freezing time was calculated by subtracting the active attempts to escape total time from the 4 min.
Novelty-suppressed feeding test (NSFT)
NSFT was performed as previously described 25. Briefly, mice were starved for 24 hours with liberal access to water only. Then the mice were placed in an open field arena under bright light conditions with one pellet of food immobilized in the center of the arena. Mice were left in the arena for a 10 min session. Each session was videotaped. An investigator blinded to the study groups scored the video files for the latency to feed. Immediately after the open arena session, each mouse was placed in its home cage alone with one food pellet for 5 min. The food pellet was weighed before and after the 5 min to quantify the amount consumed by each mouse as an index for appetite.
Lentivirus production
Second-generation packaging was used for lentivirus production. Lentiviral plasmid expressing the Siah1 shRNA was co-transfected into HEK-293T cells with packaging system psPAX2 and envelope plasmid pMD2. The media was changed after 16–18 hours of transfection. The lentivirus containing supernatant was collected 72 hours after transfection. Floating cells and cell debris were pelleted by centrifugation of the supernatant at 2,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C. The supernatant was filtered through a low protein binding 0.45 μm filter. Lentivirus particles were pelleted by ultracentrifugation at 100,000 × g for 2 hours at 4°C. The lentiviral pellet was incubated in 1/100th volume of OPTI-MEM overnight at 4°C. Then the viral particles were resuspended, aliquoted and frozen at −80°C.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Graphpad software using the alpha power level of 0.05. Two-tailed t test was used to perform two group comparisons. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to perform multiple comparisons. Data were graphed as means ± SEM.
Results
NMDA-glutamate signaling elicits Rheb degradation
Suggestive evidence in the literature led us to the hypothesis that the immediate early gene Rheb might relay NMDA signaling to mTOR. Rheb mRNA expression is rapidly induced following NMDA stimulation in the hippocampus 26. In addition, it was previously demonstrated that Rheb binds to the NMDA receptor subunit NR3A 27. Finally, Rheb is a well-documented upstream activator of mTOR. Surprisingly, Rheb levels are rapidly reduced in cortical cultures following NMDA treatment. NMDA stimulation reduces levels of Rheb as well as phospho-S6 kinase with roughly 50% decreases in Rheb levels and phospho-p70S6 kinase, an indicator of mTOR signaling, at about 5 μM NMDA (Fig. 1a). Conversely, ketamine and the NR2B selective inhibitor CERC301 (MK0657) rapidly increase Rheb levels in cortical cultures (Supplementary Figure 1a, c), which correlates with increased phospho-p70S6 kinase (Supplementary Figure 1b, d). On the other hand, the NMDA receptor antagonist memantine does not change Rheb protein levels and mTOR activity as determined by phospho-p70S6 kinase levels (Supplementary Figure 1e). The differential regulation of NMDA receptors by ketamine and memantine might explain these results 28, 29. Injecting mice with ketamine induces a rapid upregulation of Rheb levels in the hippocampus correlating with increased mTOR activation as determined by the phosphorylation status of p70S6 kinase (Fig. 1b). We explored the role of ubiquitylation in mediating downregulation of Rheb levels in response to NMDA. In untreated cortical cultures immunoprecipitated Rheb is mono- and poly-ubiquitylated. Treatment of cortical cultures with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 selectively increases poly-ubiquitylated Rheb (Fig. 1c). Similarly, the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib rapidly increases Rheb and phospho-p70S6 kinase levels in cortical cultures (Fig. 1d). We directly demonstrate both mono- and poly-ubiquitylation of Rheb in response to NMDA stimulation in cortical cultures (Supplementary Figure 1f). Depletion by NMDA of Rheb reflects its proteasomal degradation, as the proteasome inhibitor clasto-lactacystin β-lactone (CLβL) prevents NMDA-associated depletion of Rheb and the associated decline of phospho-p70S6 kinase in cortical cultures (Fig. 1e, f).
Fig. 1. NMDA signaling induces proteasome-mediated Rheb degradation.
Means ± SEM are shown. a, NMDA dose-response in cortical cultures showing a dose-dependent decrease in Rheb levels and mTOR activity. b, Injecting mice with 10 mg/kg ketamine i.p. rapidly upregulates Rheb and activates mTOR in the hippocampus. Graphs show quantification of western blot band intensities normalized to loading control. n = 6–8 mice/group. [* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01; two-tailed t test]. c, Immunoprecipitation of Rheb from cortical cultures treated with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (2 μM) shows mono- and polyubiquitylation of Rheb. MG132 treatment leads to accumulation of polyubiquitylated Rheb. d, WB and quantification of Rheb and phospho-p70S6 kinase levels following treatment of cortical culture with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib [* P < 0.05; two-tailed t test]. e, NMDA stimulation of cortical cultures for 15 min decreases Rheb and phospho-p70S6 kinase levels, which is reversed by treatment with the proteasome inhibitor clasto-lactacystin β-lactone (CLβL) as demonstrated by WB. f, Graph shows quantification of band intensities normalized to loading control from 3 replicates [* P < 0.05; two-tailed t test].
Rheb-GAPDH binding is triggered by the NMDA/NO pathway
Previously, we showed that cell stress activates isoforms of NO synthase (NOS) with the generated NO nitrosylating GAPDH, eliminating its catalytic activity and conferring the ability to bind to Siah1 which mediates nuclear translocation of the complex. In the nucleus this complex binds and activates the acetylating enzyme CREB-binding protein/p300 to augment apoptotic proteins leading to cell death 18. Ryu and colleagues 30 recently reported that GAPDH binds Rheb, preventing its association with mTOR and thereby decreasing mTOR signaling. We wondered whether glutamate-NMDA neurotransmission acting via NO might impact GAPDH-Rheb interactions. In cortical cultures we monitored the influence of NMDA upon GAPDH-Rheb binding. NMDA substantially increases such binding as does the NO donor S-nitrosocysteine (CysNO) (Fig. 2a, b). The drug CGP3466B, an extremely potent and selective inhibitor of GAPDH nitrosylation 20, 21, abolishes the stimulation by NMDA of GAPDH-Rheb binding. The non-specific NOS inhibitor nω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) and the neuronal NOS (nNOS) specific inhibitor 7-nitroindazole (7-NI) both prevent these influences of NMDA, establishing that NMDA-glutamate signaling stimulates GAPDH-Rheb binding via NO (Fig. 2a, b). The nitrosylation of GAPDH that triggers its binding to Siah1 takes place on cysteine-150 24. Mutating cysteine-150 greatly reduces binding of exogenously expressed Rheb to GAPDH in HEK 293 cells, (Fig. 2c, d). We explored the impact of GAPDH-Rheb binding upon mTOR signaling. The stimulation by NMDA of this binding is accompanied by a major decrease in phospho-p70S6 kinase (Supplementary Figure 2a). Conversely, ketamine markedly diminishes GAPDH-Rheb binding (Supplementary Figure 2b).
Fig. 2. Nitric oxide and NMDA receptor regulate GAPDH-Rheb binding.
Representative western blots (WB) are shown. Means ± SEM are shown. a, GAPDH co-immunoprecipitation with Rheb in cortical cultures is increased after 5 min treatment with NO donor CysNO and NMDA determined by western blot (WB). NMDA-induced increase in GAPDH-Rheb binding is blunted by the selective potent GAPDH nitrosylation inhibitor CGP3466B (2 nM) and by NOS inhibitors L-NAME & 7-NI (10 μM). b, Graph shows quantification of band intensities normalized to loading control from 3 replicates [ * P < 0.05; *** P < 0.001; ANOVA (Fisher’s LSD)]. c, WB showing GST pull down assay in HEK 293 cells. HA-C150S mutant of GAPDH binds to GST-Rheb with less affinity compared to HA-WT GAPDH. d, Graph shows quantification of band intensities normalized to loading control from 3 replicates [* P < 0.05; two-tailed t test]. e, WB showing increased levels of GST Rheb expression in HEK 293 cells co-transfected with increasing levels of GAPDH shRNA plasmid. f, WB showing decreased levels of GST Rheb expression in HEK 293 cells co-transfected with WT but not C150S mutant of HA-GAPDH. g, Graph shows quantification of band intensities normalized to loading control from 3 replicates [* P < 0.05; two-tailed t test]. h, NMDA stimulation of cortical cultures elicits a time-dependent decrease in Rheb levels in WT and iNOS KO but not in nNOS KO mice-derived neurons.
In HEK-293 cells we established the importance of endogenous GAPDH in lowering Rheb levels, which are increased following GAPDH depletion by shRNA (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Figure 2c). Regulation of Rheb levels by GAPDH requires its cysteine-150, whose mutation prevents the GAPDH-elicited depletion of Rheb (Fig. 2f, g). The interaction of GAPDH and Rheb is direct, as in vitro GAPDH binds Rheb with the binding increased dramatically by treatment with the NO donor CysNO, further supporting the importance of GAPDH nitrosylation in mediating its binding to Rheb (Supplementary Figure 2d, e). The regulation of mTOR activity by GAPDH is not likely the result of a global effect on protein kinases, since GAPDH overexpression in HEK-293 cells decreases phosphorylated p70S6 kinase levels but does not alter phosphorylated apoptosis signal-regulating kinase (pASK), mitogen activated kinase kinase 4 (pMKK4) or 5′ AMP-activated protein kinase (pAMPK) levels (Supplementary Figure 2f).
To investigate the role of NO in the NMDA-induced decrease of Rheb levels, we examined the time course of NMDA’s actions in cortical cultures from wild type (WT), nNOS or inducible NOS (iNOS) knockout mice. The influence of NMDA is rapid, with maximal effects by 10–15 min (Fig. 2h), and involves nNOS selectively, as the decrease of Rheb levels elicited by NMDA is abolished in cortical cultures from nNOS knockout mice but not altered in cultures from iNOS knockouts (Fig. 2h).
Siah1 binds and degrades Rheb
NMDA stimulates binding of Siah1, an ubiquitin-E3-ligase, to Rheb robustly and rapidly, with detectable effects at 2.5 min and associated with increased Rheb-GAPDH binding (Fig. 3a, b). The binding of Rheb to Siah1 is direct, as it is demonstrable with purified proteins (Fig. 3c). GAPDH enhances this binding in the presence of NO, reflecting the ternary complex of GAPDH with Rheb and Siah1 (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Figure 3a). Siah1’s role as an ubiquitin-E3-ligase for Rheb is supported by the increased levels of Rheb in cortical cultures following depletion of Siah1 by shRNA (Fig. 3d, e and Supplementary Figure 3b).
Fig. 3. Siah1 directly binds Rheb and acts as its E3 ubiquitin ligase.
Means ± SEM are shown. a, NMDA treatment time-course in cortical cultures shows Siah1 and GAPDH co-immunoprecipitation with Rheb increases following NMDA stimulation as determined by WB. b, Graph shows quantification of band intensities normalized to loading control from 3 replicates [ * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001; ANOVA (Fisher’s LSD test). c, Western blot showing GST pull down assay using purified proteins. GST-Siah1 binds directly to Rheb and GAPDH. CysNO increases the binding between GST-Siah1, Rheb and GAPDH. e, Knockdown of Siah1 in cortical cultures using lentiviral shRNA leads to up-regulation of Rheb protein levels. f, Graph shows quantification of band intensities normalized to loading control from 5 replicates [* P < 0.05; two-tailed t test].
CGP3466B, which inhibits GAPDH S-nitrosylation, displays rapid antidepressant actions
Our findings thus far reflect a signaling cascade wherein NMDA-glutamate neurotransmission activates the formation of NO which nitrosylates GAPDH enabling it to bind to Siah1 together with Rheb. In this complex the ubiquitin-E3-ligase activity of Siah1 leads to degradation of Rheb and a resulting diminution of mTOR signaling. By blocking NMDA receptors, ketamine does the reverse, stimulating mTOR signaling and presumably leading to the antidepressant actions of ketamine. We speculated that CGP3466B, which selectively inhibits GAPDH nitrosylation at concentrations as low as 0.1 nM 20, 21, 31, might, like ketamine, interrupt the NMDA-mTOR signaling pathway and exert antidepressant actions. Accordingly, we administered CGP3466B to mice in a swimming paradigm which predicts the actions of acutely administered antidepressants 32, 33. In this model mice subjected to “forced swimming” appear to “give up” and stop swimming or “freeze” 34. Treatment with antidepressant drugs decreases the freezing/immobility time. CGP3466B substantially decreases immobility time, an effect reversed by prior treatment with rapamycin (Fig. 4a, b). CGP3466B does not alter locomotor activity of mice (Supplementary Figure 4a). We also explored potential rapid antidepressant activity of CGP3466B in the novelty-suppressed feeding test (NSFT). Traditional antidepressants are only effective in NSFT following chronic (21 days) administration 35. By contrast, CGP3466B is acutely (30 min) effective in NSFT, with effects reversed by rapamycin (Fig. 4a, c). CGP3466B does not alter food intake (Supplementary Figure 4b).
Fig. 4. Rapid antidepressant-like behavioral effects of the GAPDH nitrosylation inhibitor CGP3466B require mTOR.
Means ± SEM are shown. Behavioral experiments were scored in a blinded fashion. a, Schematic diagram of experimental time line. FST forced swimming test; NSFT, novelty suppressed feeding test. b, FST in mice showing reduction in immobility or freezing time 30 min after 0.6 mg/kg of CGP3466B reversed by 5 mg/kg rapamycin. Control n = 36; Rapamycin n = 15, CGP3466B n = 35; Rapamycin-CGP3466B n = 20; ANOVA; P = 0.0003; Newman-Keuls multiple comparisons test: *** P < 0.001; * P < 0.05. c, NSFT in mice showing reduction in latency to feed 30 min after 0.6 mg/kg of CGP3466B reversed by 5 mg/kg rapamycin. Control n = 31; Rapamycin n = 15, CGP3466B n = 20; Rapamycin-CGP3466B n = 15; ANOVA; P = 0.008; Newman-Keuls multiple comparisons test: * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01.
Discussion
In summary, our findings provide a molecular mechanism whereby NMDA receptor antagonists such as ketamine can increase mTOR signaling to elicit antidepressant actions. By blocking NMDA receptors, ketamine decreases neural formation of NO. The reported antidepressant phenotypes associated with NOS inhibition 36 may reflect the pathway described here. In this cascade NO nitrosylates GAPDH at cysteine-150. Conceivably, drugs, such as CGP3466B, which inhibit such nitrosylation, may exert antidepressant influences. Though CGP3466B displays prominent neuroprotective actions 20, we are not aware of studies of CGP3466B in animal models of depression. In the ternary complex of nitrosylated GAPDH/Rheb/Siah1 the ubiquitin-E3-ligase activity of Siah1 degrades Rheb leading to decreased mTOR activation.
What is most striking about the antidepressant actions of ketamine is their rapidity and persistence with clinical improvement of mood in depressed patients evident within 2 hours and with these effects lasting at least for a week 37. Whether or not the immediate action of ketamine involves the same or different mechanisms than the longer acting effects is not established, but it is reasonable to suppose that the initial improvement in mood is persistent at least for several days and involves the same mechanism. Accordingly, the influence of ketamine upon Rheb disposition might account both for the immediate and the longer lasting influences of ketamine and other NMDA antagonists.
Neurotransmission, especially via glutamate acting upon NMDA receptors, is known to impact protein translation 38–41. Underlying molecular mechanisms have been elusive. The regulation by glutamate/NMDA signaling of Rheb and mTOR may well mediate these actions. Presumably AMPA signaling will influence protein translation by augmenting NMDA transmission.
Memantine is an NMDA antagonist that has been employed clinically in Alzheimer’s Disease 42. In our experiments memantine did not impact Rheb/mTOR disposition. This finding may relate to studies reporting that memantine, unlike ketamine, fails to elicit rapid antidepressant responses 43. Lipton and associates 44 provided evidence that memantine may differ from other NMDA antagonists in preferentially blocking extra-synaptic rather than synaptic NMDA receptors. It is postulated that the antidepressant effects require blockade of synaptic NMDA receptors.
Ketamine’s blockade of NMDA transmission stimulates mTOR signaling, which presumably mediates antidepressant influences. Other therapeutic possibilities might emerge from further exploitation of this novel signaling pathway whereby NMDA neurotransmission, via GAPDH, Siah1, and Rheb, impacts mTOR.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank L. Hester, R. Barrow, A. Snowman, B. Ziegler and A. Carmichael for their assistance. We are also grateful for discussions with members of the S.H.S. laboratory. This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Service Grant DA00266.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: The authors declare none.
References
- 1.Covington HE, 3rd, Vialou V, Nestler EJ. From synapse to nucleus: Novel targets for treating depression. Neuropharmacology. 2010;58:683–93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Javitt DC. Glutamate as a therapeutic target in psychiatric disorders. Mol Psychiatry. 2004;9:984, 97, 979. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lipton SA. Pathologically-activated therapeutics for neuroprotection: Mechanism of NMDA receptor block by memantine and S-nitrosylation. Curr Drug Targets. 2007;8:621–32. doi: 10.2174/138945007780618472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pilc A, Wieronska JM, Skolnick P. Glutamate-based antidepressants: Preclinical psychopharmacology. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;73:1125–32. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Svenningsson P, Bateup H, Qi H, Takamiya K, Huganir RL, Spedding M, et al. Involvement of AMPA receptor phosphorylation in antidepressant actions with special reference to tianeptine. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;26:3509–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05952.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shabel SJ, Proulx CD, Piriz J, Malinow R. Mood regulation. GABA/glutamate co-release controls habenula output and is modified by antidepressant treatment. Science. 2014;345:1494–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1250469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Autry AE, Adachi M, Nosyreva E, Na ES, Los MF, Cheng PF, et al. NMDA receptor blockade at rest triggers rapid behavioural antidepressant responses. Nature. 2011;475:91–5. doi: 10.1038/nature10130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Berman RM, Cappiello A, Anand A, Oren DA, Heninger GR, Charney DS, et al. Antidepressant effects of ketamine in depressed patients. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;47:351–4. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00230-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Murrough JW, Iosifescu DV, Chang LC, Al Jurdi RK, Green CE, Perez AM, et al. Antidepressant efficacy of ketamine in treatment-resistant major depression: A two-site randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170:1134–42. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13030392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zarate CA, Jr, Singh JB, Carlson PJ, Brutsche NE, Ameli R, Luckenbaugh DA, et al. A randomized trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant major depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:856–64. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lindholm JS, Autio H, Vesa L, Antila H, Lindemann L, Hoener MC, et al. The antidepressant-like effects of glutamatergic drugs ketamine and AMPA receptor potentiator LY 451646 are preserved in bdnf(+)/(−) heterozygous null mice. Neuropharmacology. 2012;62:391–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Monteggia LM, Zarate C., Jr Antidepressant actions of ketamine: From molecular mechanisms to clinical practice. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2015;30:139–43. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Murrough JW, Charney DS. Cracking the moody brain: Lifting the mood with ketamine. Nat Med. 2010;16:1384–5. doi: 10.1038/nm1210-1384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.O’Leary OF, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Faster, better, stronger: Towards new antidepressant therapeutic strategies. Eur J Pharmacol. 2015;753:32–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.07.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li N, Lee B, Liu RJ, Banasr M, Dwyer JM, Iwata M, et al. mTOR-dependent synapse formation underlies the rapid antidepressant effects of NMDA antagonists. Science. 2010;329:959–64. doi: 10.1126/science.1190287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hara MR, Agrawal N, Kim SF, Cascio MB, Fujimuro M, Ozeki Y, et al. S-nitrosylated GAPDH initiates apoptotic cell death by nuclear translocation following Siah1 binding. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7:665–74. doi: 10.1038/ncb1268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Stamler JS, Hess DT. Nascent nitrosylases. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:1024–6. doi: 10.1038/ncb1110-1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sen N, Hara MR, Kornberg MD, Cascio MB, Bae BI, Shahani N, et al. Nitric oxide-induced nuclear GAPDH activates p300/CBP and mediates apoptosis. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:866–73. doi: 10.1038/ncb1747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sen N, Snyder SH. Neurotrophin-mediated degradation of histone methyltransferase by S-nitrosylation cascade regulates neuronal differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:20178–83. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117820108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hara MR, Thomas B, Cascio MB, Bae BI, Hester LD, Dawson VL, et al. Neuroprotection by pharmacologic blockade of the GAPDH death cascade. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:3887–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0511321103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kragten E, Lalande I, Zimmermann K, Roggo S, Schindler P, Muller D, et al. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, the putative target of the antiapoptotic compounds CGP 3466 and R-(−)-deprenyl. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:5821–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.10.5821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Waldmeier PC, Boulton AA, Cools AR, Kato AC, Tatton WG. Neurorescuing effects of the GAPDH ligand CGP 3466B. J Neural Transm Suppl. 2000;(60):197–214. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6301-6_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Waldmeier PC, Spooren WP, Hengerer B. CGP 3466 protects dopaminergic neurons in lesion models of parkinson’s disease. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2000;362:526–37. doi: 10.1007/s002100000300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hara MR, Agrawal N, Kim SF, Cascio MB, Fujimuro M, Ozeki Y, et al. S-nitrosylated GAPDH initiates apoptotic cell death by nuclear translocation following Siah1 binding. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7:665–74. doi: 10.1038/ncb1268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Samuels BA, Hen R. Novelty-suppressed feeding in the mouse. In: Gould TD, editor. Mood and Anxiety Related Phenotypes in Mice Characterization Using Behavioral Tests. Humana Press; 2011. pp. 107–21. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yamagata K, Sanders LK, Kaufmann WE, Yee W, Barnes CA, Nathans D, et al. Rheb, a growth factor- and synaptic activity-regulated gene, encodes a novel ras-related protein. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:16333–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sucher NJ, Yu E, Chan SF, Miri M, Lee BJ, Xiao B, et al. Association of the small GTPase rheb with the NMDA receptor subunit NR3A. Neurosignals. 2010;18:203–9. doi: 10.1159/000322206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gideons ES, Kavalali ET, Monteggia LM. Mechanisms underlying differential effectiveness of memantine and ketamine in rapid antidepressant responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:8649–54. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323920111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Xia P, Chen HS, Zhang D, Lipton SA. Memantine preferentially blocks extrasynaptic over synaptic NMDA receptor currents in hippocampal autapses. J Neurosci. 2010;30:11246–50. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2488-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lee MN, Ha SH, Kim J, Koh A, Lee CS, Kim JH, et al. Glycolytic flux signals to mTOR through glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase-mediated regulation of rheb. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:3991–4001. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00165-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Waldmeier PC, Boulton AA, Cools AR, Kato AC, Tatton WG. Neurorescuing effects of the GAPDH ligand CGP 3466B. J Neural Transm Suppl. 2000;(60):197–214. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6301-6_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lucki I. The forced swimming test as a model for core and component behavioral effects of antidepressant drugs. Behav Pharmacol. 1997;8:523–32. doi: 10.1097/00008877-199711000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Porsolt RD, Bertin A, Jalfre M. Behavioral despair in mice: A primary screening test for antidepressants. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1977;229:327–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Can A, Dao DT, Arad M, Terrillion CE, Piantadosi SC, Gould TD. The mouse forced swim test. J Vis Exp. 2012;(59):e3638. doi: 10.3791/3638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Dulawa SC, Hen R. Recent advances in animal models of chronic antidepressant effects: The novelty-induced hypophagia test. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005;29:771–83. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Harkin AJ, Bruce KH, Craft B, Paul IA. Nitric oxide synthase inhibitors have antidepressant-like properties in mice. 1. acute treatments are active in the forced swim test. Eur J Pharmacol. 1999;372:207–13. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(99)00191-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Abdallah CG, Sanacora G, Duman RS, Krystal JH. Ketamine and rapid-acting antidepressants: A window into a new neurobiology for mood disorder therapeutics. Annu Rev Med. 2015;66:509–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-053013-062946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sutton MA, Schuman EM. Local translational control in dendrites and its role in long-term synaptic plasticity. J Neurobiol. 2005;64:116–31. doi: 10.1002/neu.20152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Marin P, Nastiuk KL, Daniel N, Girault JA, Czernik AJ, Glowinski J, et al. Glutamate-dependent phosphorylation of elongation factor-2 and inhibition of protein synthesis in neurons. J Neurosci. 1997;17:3445–54. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-10-03445.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Vornov JJ, Coyle JT. Glutamate neurotoxicity and the inhibition of protein synthesis in the hippocampal slice. J Neurochem. 1991;56:996–1006. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1991.tb02020.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Orrego F, Lipmann F. Protein synthesis in brain slices. effects of electrical stimulation and acidic amino acids. J Biol Chem. 1967;242:665–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nakamura T, Lipton SA. Redox modulation by S-nitrosylation contributes to protein misfolding, mitochondrial dynamics, and neuronal synaptic damage in neurodegenerative diseases. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18:1478–86. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zarate CA, Jr, Singh JB, Quiroz JA, De Jesus G, Denicoff KK, Luckenbaugh DA, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of memantine in the treatment of major depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:153–5. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Xia P, Chen HS, Zhang D, Lipton SA. Memantine preferentially blocks extrasynaptic over synaptic NMDA receptor currents in hippocampal autapses. J Neurosci. 2010;30:11246–50. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2488-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




