Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Apr 14;6:24309. doi: 10.1038/srep24309

Fractionation of Stable Cadmium Isotopes in the Cadmium Tolerant Ricinus communis and Hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum

Rongfei Wei 1, Qingjun Guo 1,a, Hanjie Wen 2, Congqiang Liu 2, Junxing Yang 1, Marc Peters 1, Jian Hu 2, Guangxu Zhu 2, Hanzhi Zhang 3, Liyan Tian 1, Xiaokun Han 1, Jie Ma 1, Chuanwei Zhu 2, Yingxin Wan 4
PMCID: PMC4830953  PMID: 27076359

Abstract

Cadmium (Cd) isotopes provide new insights into Cd uptake, transport and storage mechanisms in plants. Therefore, the present study adopted the Cd-tolerant Ricinus communis and Cd-hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum, which were cultured under controlled conditions in a nutrient solution with variable Cd supply, to test the isotopic fractionation of Cd during plant uptake. The Cd isotope compositions of nutrient solutions and organs of the plants were measured by multiple collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (MC-ICPMS). The mass balance of Cd isotope yields isotope fractionations between plant and Cd source (δ114/110Cdorgans-solution) of −0.70‰ to −0.22‰ in Ricinus communis and −0.51‰ to −0.33‰ in Solanum nigrum. Moreover, Cd isotope fractionation during Cd transport from stem to leaf differs between the Cd-tolerant and -hyperaccumulator species. Based on these results, the processes (diffusion, adsorption, uptake or complexation), which may induce Cd isotope fractionation in plants, have been discussed. Overall, the present study indicates potential applications of Cd isotopes for investigating plant physiology.

Cadmium (Cd) is a highly toxic heavy metal that can be accumulated in the human body through the food chain1,2. The health risks of environmental Cd pollution have caused global concern, since the ‘itai-itai’ disease caused by chronic Cd poisoning appeared in Japan in the 1950’s3. As a cost-effective and environmentally sustainable strategy4, phytoremediation could be used in the remediation and sustainable management of Cd polluted soils5. The mechanisms of Cd uptake, transport, and storage in plants are of high interest with respect to phytoremediation of Cd polluted soils.

Metal isotope signatures can be applied to identify the chemical process controlling metal transformation in plants and organisms6. Previous researchers have studied the metal toxicity in plants using different concentrations and forms of heavy metals7,8. At present, some studies have comprehensively investigated the distribution of metal isotopes in plants, including isotopes of Fe9,10, Zn11,12,13, Cu14,15, Ca16,17,18,19,20, Mg21,22, and Ni23. Overall, these studies suggested that the identification of different isotopes within higher plants had specific mode of transport. Hence, metal isotopes could be used as valuable tracers when researching metal uptake, storage and translocation processes within plants.

High precision multiple collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (MC-ICPMS) has extended the application range of Cd isotopes. Cd stable isotopes were initially used to study mass-dependent fractionation in ordinary chondrites and lunar samples, generated by partial evaporation and condensation24,25,26. In addition, some studies reported that anthropogenic processes might lead to Cd isotopic fractionations, suggesting that Cd stable isotopes could be used as tracers for anthropogenic Cd pollution of the environment27,28,29,30. Moreover, many studies have focused on the marine environment, suggesting that biological uptake and utilisation of dissolved seawater Cd generated significant Cd isotope fractionation in the oceans31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38.

However, to date there has been limited research on Cd isotopic composition in plants. In the present study, three Cd tolerant Ricinus communis cultivars (Zibo-5, Zibo-6, Zibo-8) and one Cd hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum cultivar were used to study Cd uptake and translocation. These three R. communis cultivars were all high-Cd accumulators, and S. nigrum was a relatively fast-growing and high-biomass Cd-hyperaccumulator39,40 used to develop new techniques for phytoextraction41. We conducted hydroponic culture experiments with these plant species and two nutrient solutions with differing Cd concentrations to 1) characterise the Cd isotope fractionation associated with Cd transfer in the Cd-tolerant and -hyperaccumulator species; and 2) explore possible mechanisms of Cd mobilisation from the solution to various physiological compartments.

Materials and Methods

Plant Growth

Seeds of three R. communis cultivars (Zibo.5, Zibo.6 and Zibo.8) and S. nigrum were obtained from the Zibo Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Shandong, China) and the Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shenyang, China), respectively. All seeds were washed in running deionized water before germination in the substrate for 14 d. The seedlings were then transferred into polycarbonate pots containing half strength Hoagland’s solution39. The macronutrient solution consisted of 2 mmol·L−1 Ca(NO3)2, 2.5 mmol·L−1 KNO3, 0.5 mmol·L−1 KH2PO4, 1 mmol·L−1 MgSO4 and 0.5 mmol·L−1 NH4NO3, as well as the micronutrient solution consisted of 0.25 μmol·L−1 H3BO3, 0.25 μmol·L−1 MnSO4, 0.25 nmol·L−1 CoCl2, 12.5 nmol·L−1 KI, 75 nmol·L−1 ZnSO4, 0.25 nmol·L−1 CuSO4, 2.5 nmol·L−1 Na2MoO4 and 25 μmol·L−1 Fe-EDTA. After 7 d, CdCl2·2.5H2O was added to the Cd concentration of 2 mg·L−1 (Low Cd) and 5 mg·L−1 (High Cd). No Cd was added to the control check (CK).

Plants were cultivated under controlled conditions (16 h photoperiod with a white light intensity of 350 μ mol photons m−2 s−1; day: night temperatures 25 °C: 18 °C; relative humidity 60% ~ 70%). The isotopic composition (δ114/110Cdspex) of the initial nutrient solution relative to Spex Cd standard solution was +0.14 ± 0.08‰ (2SD, n = 3).

Sample Preparation

Three plant samples as replicates were harvested 30 d after their transplantation, washed with tap water, and then rinsed thrice with deionized water. Each plant was divided into root, stem and leaf. Plant materials were freeze-dried and weighed prior analysis.

0.2 g of plant samples were digested in concentrated aristar grade HNO3 (5 mL) and HF (1 mL) for 48 h in acid-cleaned Teflon beakers. The closed beakers were placed on a hot plate for 8 h at 80 °C and then at 160 °C until the plants were completely digested. Then 2–3 mL of HClO4 was added to the digested solutions to remove organic materials. After evaporation at 165–180 °C, the samples were dried and redissolved in 5 mL 1% (v/v) HNO3 (to convert the residue into the nitrate form). 2 mL of supernatant were transferred into pre-cleaned polyethylene bottles for the determination of the Cd content. The remaining fractions were evaporated to dryness, redissolved in 10 mol·L−1 HCl (to convert the residue into the chloride form), dried again, and finally taken up in 2 mL 2 mol·L−1 HCl for loading on columns.

Cd was purified by anionic exchange chromatography from nutrient solution (initial and final), root, stem and leaf following the procedure of Wei et al.42. Just prior to determination, the solutions were evaporated to near complete dryness and taken up in an appropriate volume of 1% HNO3 to obtain the desired Cd concentration for mass spectrometric analysis. The recovery of Cd purification in this study was higher than 95%.

Cadmium Isotope Analysis

The Cd concentration of nutrient solutions, root, stem and leaf was measured prior to Cd purification by inductively coupled plasma quadrupole mass spectrometry (ICP-QMS) (Elan DRC-e, Perkin Elmer, USA). The Cd isotope ratios were measured by multiple collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (MC-ICPMS). Cd isotope ratios were measured by 30 cycles for each sample with an internal precision of ±0.01‰ ∼ ±0.02‰ (RSD). The Cd isotope values were expressed as permil deviation relative to the Spex Cd standard solution:

graphic file with name srep24309-m1.jpg

Standard 1 and Standard 2 represented the standard solution measured before and after the sample.

All concentration data were corrected for the procedural blank, which ranged from 8.8 ng to 13.2 ng during the course of this study. At this level, the blank has a negligible effect on the measured isotope compositions, because it constitutes less than 0.0132‰ of the indigenous Cd present in plant samples. Standard-sample bracketing was applied in this study to correct the mass bias. The instrumental reproducibility based on repetitive δ114/110Cd measurements of Spex Cd standard solution was 0.09‰ (2SD, N = 214). The accuracy of the measurements was verified by measuring the Münster Cd standard solution and the results (+4.53 ± 0.08‰ of δ114/110Cd) were in good agreement with previously published values30,43.

To express the isotope fractionation between two components A and B, we used δ114/110CdA−B that equaled the difference δ114/110CdA − δ114/110CdB.

The isotope composition of the whole plant Cd δ114/110 CdWP has be established according to the following:

graphic file with name srep24309-m2.jpg

The Cd isotope composition of shoot and the whole plant (WP) relative to Spex Cd standard solution, as well as the isotopic variation between the different organs are shown in Table 2.

Table 1. Effects of Cd stress on bioconcentration factor (BCF), translocation factor (TF) and tolerance index (TI) of three R. communis cultivars and S. nigrum in hydroponic conditions.

Plants Cd treatment BCF
 TF (%) TI (%)
root shoot
Zibo.5 2ppm 1107.2 ± 211.6a 38.5 ± 8.7a 3.5 ± 0.6 a 104.7 ± 9.4a
5ppm 900.2 ± 75.0b 31.9 ± 6.7a 3.5 ± 0.7a 97.0 ± 9.1a
Zibo.6 2ppm 521.2 ± 168.3b 20.7 ± 4.6b 4.0 ± 1.3b 141.5 ± 15.0a
5ppm 679.4 ± 65.3a 46.5 ± 2.8a 6.9 ± 0.8a 89.4 ± 11.8b
Zibo.8 2ppm 662.7 ± 99.3b 41.3 ± 5.7a 6.2 ± 0.1a 84.1 ± 15.8a
5ppm 824.0 ±  86.8a 33.9 ± 4.7b 4.1 ± 0.9b 83.1 ± 6.0a
S. nigrum 2ppm 452.1 ± 123.1b 117.2 ± 11.2a 25.9 ± 8.9a 37.9 ± 9.4b
5ppm 753.6 ± 70.3a 61.4 ± 8.7b 8.2 ± 1.0b 59.8 ± 11.3a
Open in a new tab

Mean values (n = 3) with different letters in the same column for each cultivar are significantly different according to the independent samples T-test (p < 0.05).

Table 2. δ114/110Cd values in root, shoot, and whole plant (WP) of the three R. communis cultivars and S. nigrum relative to Spex Cd standard solution, as well as the isotopic variations between different organs.

δ114/110Cd (‰) Low Cd (2ppm)
 High Cd (5ppm)
Zibo-5 Zibo-6 Zibo-8 S.nigrum Zibo-5 Zibo-6 Zibo-8 S.nigrum
Root (δ114/110Cdspex) −0.12 −0.23 −0.08 −0.25 −0.01 −0.13 −0.14 −0.25
Shoot (δ114/110Cdspex) −0.22 −0.05 −0.13 −0.19 −0.08 −0.14 −0.09 −0.10
WP (δ114/110Cdspex) −0.14 −0.20 −0.09 −0.22 −0.02 −0.13 −0.13 −0.22
Root-Solution −0.35 −0.49 −0.31 −0.44 −0.34 −0.34 −0.28 −0.51
Stem-Root −0.08 0.19 −0.03 0.02 −0.03 0.01 0.06 0.14
Leaf-Stem −0.18 −0.04 −0.14 0.09 −0.33 −0.28 −0.08 0.01
WP-Solution −0.37 −0.46 −0.32 −0.41 −0.35 −0.34 −0.27 −0.48
Shoot -WP −0.08 0.15 −0.04 0.03 −0.05 −0.01 0.04 0.11
Open in a new tab

Data Analysis

Cadmium bioconcentration factor (BCF) was defined as the ratio of Cd in shoot or root of the plant to that in the nutrient solution. Cadmium translocation factor (TF) was described as the ratio of Cd in the shoot to that in the root. Tolerance index (TI) was defined as the ratio of the plant biomass after Cd treatments to that of the control group. The indexes were defined as follows:

graphic file with name srep24309-m3.jpg

where, Corgan (mg·kg−1) and Cmedium (mg·L−1) represent the Cd concentration in the shoot or root and the Cd concentration in the nutrient solution, respectively.

graphic file with name srep24309-m4.jpg

where, Cshoot (mg·kg−1) and Croot (mg·kg−1) represent the Cd concentration in the shoot and the Cd concentration in the root, respectively.

graphic file with name srep24309-m5.jpg

where, WCd (g) and Wcontrol (g) represent the biomass after Cd treatment and the biomass of the control group, respectively.

Results

Cd concentration and mass in organs of R. communis and S. nigrum

The Cd concentrations in different organs of R. communis and S. nigrum are shown in Fig. 1a,b. The Cd concentration of the leaf is much higher in S. nigrum than that in R. communis, whereas it is equal to or lower in stem and root of S. nigrum than that of R. communis. Cd concentrations in different organs of R. communis exhibit a significant gradient with a progressive increase from upper to lower organs, by the order of leaf <stem <root, independently of the Cd concentration in the nutrient solution. In contrast, the Cd concentration in the leaf of S. nigrum is higher than that in the stem under low Cd conditions.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Cd concentration (a,b), dry weight (c,d), Cd mass (e,f) and Cd distribution (g,h) of root, stem, and leaf of three R. communis cultivars and S. nigrum during the 2ppm and 5ppm Cd solution conditions. Error bars show standard deviation (SD) of the three replicates.

It is essential to precisely determine mass-balances for Cd in the different organs when Cd transfer in the plants is investigated13,44. The Cd mass is calculated using the dry weight and Cd concentrations of the plant organs as shown in Fig. 1c–f. The total Cd mass in R. communis is higher than that in S. nigrum. The Cd mass in the root of R. communis is higher than that in the shoot independently of low or high Cd conditions. In contrast, Cd mass in the root of S. nigrum is much lower than that in the shoot under low Cd conditions. The Cd mass in the two tested plant species exhibits a consistent gradient that progressively increase from upper to lower organs, by the order of leaf <stem< root.

Cd bioconcentration factor, translocation factor and tolerance index of R. communis and S. nigrum

All bioconcentration factors (BCFs) of the four plant cultivars are higher than 1 (Table 1). The BCFs of the four cultivars under soil condition are lower than those under hydroponic conditions, considering that Cd in soil occurs in complicated forms because of its association with many physicochemical environments that impact Cd availability. The root BCFs of different cultivars increase by the order of Zibo-5 > Zibo-8 > Zibo-6 > S. nigrum under low Cd conditions, whereas they increase by the order of Zibo-5 > Zibo-8 > S. nigrum > Zibo-6 under high Cd conditions. The shoot BCFs of different cultivars increase by the order of S. nigrum > Zibo-8 > Zibo-5 > Zibo-6 under low Cd conditions, whereas they increase by the order of S. nigrum > Zibo-6 > Zibo-8 > Zibo-5 under high Cd conditions. Consequently, the root BCFs are highest in Zibo-5, followed by Zibo-8, whereas the shoot BCFs are highest in S. nigrum.

The translocation factors (TFs) of four plant cultivars are low, which indicates that the Cd concentration is higher in root than that in shoot. The TFs of different cultivars increase by the order of S. nigrum > Zibo-8 > Zibo-6 > Zibo-5 under low Cd conditions, whereas they increase by the order of S. nigrum > Zibo-6 > Zibo-8 > Zibo-5 under high Cd conditions. Thus, S. nigrum accumulates the highest Cd concentrations during Cd translocation from root to shoot, whereas Zibo-5 accumulates the least, regardless of Cd concentration in solution.

A tolerance index (TI) based on biomass exposed to heavy metals is used to evaluate the heavy metal toxicity in the plants45. The TIs of different cultivars increase by the order of Zibo-6 > Zibo-5 > Zibo-8 > S. nigrum under low Cd conditions, whereas they increase by the order of Zibo-5 > Zibo-6 > Zibo-8 > S. nigrum under high Cd conditions. R. communis reveals higher TI than S. nigrum under hydroponic conditions, showing higher Cd tolerance of R. communis than S. nigrum.

According to an independent samples T-test (p < 0.05), the Cd treatments exert significant effects on transport and accumulation in Zibo-6, Zibo-8, and S. nigrum but have no significant effects on shoot accumulation and transport in Zibo-5. Overall, R. communis is characterised by a higher Cd tolerance, whereas S. nigrum has a higher potential to translocate Cd from root to shoot. In the organs of these four plant cultivars, more Cd is accumulated in the root of R. communis, whereas more Cd is translocated from root to shoot in S. nigrum than R. communis.

Cd isotopic composition in R. communis and S. nigrum

The four plant cultivars reveal small differences in δ114/110CdStem-Root (Table 2). The stem of Zibo-5 is enriched in lighter isotopes relative to the root, whereas Zibo-6 and S. nigrum are enriched in heavy isotopes relative to the root. In contrast, the δ114/110CdStem-Root values of Zibo-8 behave differently under low and high Cd conditions. In low Cd conditions, the stem of Zibo-8 is depleted of heavy isotopes relative to the root, which is consistent with Zibo-5, whereas, in high Cd conditions, the stem of Zibo-8 is enriched in heavy isotopes relative to the root, which is consistent with Zibo-6 and S. nigrum. The three R. communis cultivars show similar distributions of heavy and light Cd isotopes in stem and leaf, which are different to S. nigrum. The leaf of the three R. communis cultivars is all enriched in lighter isotopes relative to the stem, whereas those of S. nigrum are depleted of light isotopes relative to the stem (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Cd isotope compositions (reported as δ114/110Cdspex) in final solution, root, stem, and leaf of three R. communis cultivars and S. nigrum.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Error bars show standard deviation (SD) of the three replicates.

The Cd isotope compositions in the organs of Zibo-5, Zibo-6, and S. nigrum under low and high Cd conditions behave similarly, but differently to Zibo-8. The observed isotopic fractionations between the solution and organs increase by the order of δ114/110CdRoot-Solution > δ114/110CdStem-Solution > δ114/110CdLeaf-Solution for Zibo-5, whereas they increase in the reverse order by δ114/110CdLeaf-Solution >δ114/110CdStem -Solution >δ114/110CdRoot-Solution for S. nigrum. In contrast, the isotope value of δ114/110CdStem-Solution in Zibo-6 is larger than values of δ114/110CdRoot-Solution and δ114/110CdLeaf-Solution. The Cd isotopic fractionation between the solution and organs of Zibo-8 under low conditions behave similar to Zibo-5, but those under high conditions behave similarly to Zibo-6.

Discussion

The average δ114/110CdWP-Solution values observed from solution to plants for Zibo-5, Zibo-6, Zibo-8, and S. nigrum are −0.36‰, −0.40‰, −0.30‰ and −0.46‰, respectively (Table 2). The observed enrichment of light Cd isotopes is consistent with previous studies on other metal isotopes (e.g. Cu, Fe, Zn, Ca) in plants, except for Mg exhibiting isotopically heavy plant biomass6,13,14,15,23,46. The physiological and molecular mechanisms of Cd hyperaccumulation and tolerance include root proliferation in Cd-rich substrate, influx into cytosol or vacuole by specific and non-specific transporters, and complexation of Cd by certain ligands in cells47. Based on the physiological and molecular mechanisms of Cd in higher plants, the speciation and diffusion in solution, adsorption on the root cell walls, uptake by ZIP proteins (Zinc-regulated transporter, iron-regulated transporter protein), complexation by phytosiderophores in solution and uptake of the entire complex through the membrane may affect the metal isotope fractionation6,14,44. The Cd isotopic composition in root and shoot possibly reflects a combination of all these processes.

Two possible abiotic processes could lead to isotope fractionation at the solution-root interface: diffusion and adsorption. Rodushkin et al.48 found that lighter isotopes diffused faster than heavier isotopes and free ions diffused faster than complex ions. Diffusion from solution to root could lead to an enrichment of the lighter isotopes at the root surface. In addition, adsorption could also result in Cd isotope fractionation. A previous study49 showed a small Cd isotope fractionation occurred during sorption of Cd to synthetic birnessite from low ionic strength solution, with lighter isotopes sorbed and heavier isotopes remaining in solution. In the present study, the δ114/110Cd Root-Solution in R. communis and S. nigrum is −0.51‰ to −0.28‰ (Table 2). The root is enriched in the lighter Cd isotope. Therefore, diffusion may be a dominant process, leading to Cd isotope fractionation at the solution-root interface of R. communis and S. nigrum.

Cd transport across the root cell and other cell membranes are possibly metabolically controlled14. In addition, within plants Cd can be transported along the electrochemical gradient via carrier proteins and ion channels or against the electrochemical gradient via electrogenic pumps13,14. Carrier-mediated transport favours heavy isotopes because it involves covalent binding to a carrier protein on the outer side of the membrane, with subsequent release on the inner side as a result of conformational changes in the carrier13. Conversely, transport through ion channels or via electrogenic pumps favours light isotopes because of its greater diffusion coefficient14. The observed net enrichment of the lighter isotopes in root and the differences between the plant cultivars, therefore, suggest that membrane transport is dominated by ion channels and electrogenic pumps rather than by carrier-mediated transport.

The differences in Cd isotopic fractionation from root to stem of four plant cultivars might be due to the different Cd supply limitation, which is associated with the tolerance of plants. Although the Cd mass in nutrient solutions is sufficiently supplied, the Cd mass translocated in the extracellular and cellular plant organs might be limited in different plant cultivars. The magnitudes of the isotopic shifts during the solution-to-organ transfer slightly increase with decreasing Cd concentrations in the organs (Fig. 3). Moreover, the plant biomass is higher under low Cd conditions than that under high Cd conditions (Fig. 1c,d). Therefore, the Cd stress affects the magnitude of the isotopic shift during the solution-to-organ transfer. Gault-Ringold et al.34 proposed that Cd uptake of phytoplankton did not result in no net Cd isotopic fractionation under ‘supply-limited’ condition, but it could be kinetically driven resulting in Cd isotopic fractionation under sufficiently high Cd levels. This could explain the different Cd isotope fractionation from root to stem between the cultivars.

Figure 3. Relationships between the Cd concentration and δ114/110Cd in the organs of R. communis and S. nigrum under different Cd conditions.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

The variation in the Cd isotopic composition between stem and leaf in R. communis and S. nigrum is distinct. It may be attributed to the complexation with organic acids, phytochelatins (PCs), and metallothionein in the xylem of S. nigrum. Sun et al.50 identified that complexation with organic acids, phytochelatins (PCs), and metallothionein was an important mechanism for Cd detoxification, transportation and storage in S. nigrum. In addition, previous work14 also showed that complexation with organic ligands led to an enrichment of heavy isotope in the organs. Figure 1g,h show that a higher amount of Cd is stored in the root of R. communis, whereas more Cd is translocated to the stem and leaf of S. nigrum. This can be explained by the complexation of organic acids, phytochelatins (PCs), and metallothionein in S. nigrum with Cd, which catalyse the translocation of Cd from root to shoot. The observed difference between root and shoot in the Cd-tolerant and -hyperaccumulator species may reflect the different Cd transportation mechanisms of the species.

Until recently, limited studies have reported the Cd isotopic composition in plants, including Cyperus alternifolius (−0.37‰ of δ114/110Cdspex), Pteris vittata (−0.34‰ of δ114/110Cdspex) and some birch leaves (ranged from +0.30‰ to +1.3‰ of δ114/110Cdspex)42,51. In the present study, all Cd isotopic compositions of plants determined for R. communis (−0.40‰ to −0.01‰) and S. nigrum (−0.25‰ to −0.10‰) show negative values relative to the Spex Cd standard solution. This further suggests that these two plant species preferentially take up lighter Cd isotope. In comparison, Pallavicini et al.51 reported that the δ114/110Cdspex values of birch leaves favoured the enrichment of heavier Cd isotopes. Wei et al.42 suggested that different Cd isotopic compositions in different plant samples could result from distinct mechanisms of Cd accumulation in plants or different sources of Cd (from soil or nutrient solution).

The Cd isotopic composition of R. communis and S. nigrum are enriched with Cd isotope reservoirs in nature. Fig. 4 shows Cd isotope investigations on natural materials, such as meteorites and lunar rocks24,25,26,52, seawater34,35,36,37,38,53,54,55,56, samples from Pb-Zn smelting and refining plants28,29, and soil polluted by the emissions from plants57,58. Compared with the Cd isotope values in those materials, the variation of Cd isotopic compositions in plants is small. However, plants represent a reservoir of Cd isotopes in nature. In previous studies28,29,57,58, the δ114/110Cdspex values of source featured with ‘slag (+0.4‰)> GSS-1 (+0.1‰)> GSD-12 (−0.4‰)> dust (−0.6‰)> Zinc oxide ore (−1.2‰)> residue (−1.4‰)> Primary Zinc ore (−1.6‰)’ (Fig. 4). In the present study, the δ114/110Cdspex ranges for R. communis (−0.40‰ to −0.01‰) and S. nigrum (−0.25‰ to −0.10‰) were between the δ114/110Cdspex values of GSS-1(soil) and GSD-12 (sediment).

Figure 4. Cd isotopic compositions in plants and other natural materials (reported as δ114/110Cdspex)24,26,28,29,34,35,36,37,38,53,54,55,56,57,58.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

GSS-1 and GSD-12 are geological reference materials. GSS-1 is a dark brown podzolitic soil, typical of the mountainous terrain of Northeast China. The underlying granitic bedrock is a part of a lead-zinc mineralisation district. GSD-12 stream sediment is from a tributary draining river in the Yangchun ore field (Cu, W, Sn), Guangdong, China.

Conclusions

In the present study, the Cd isotope measurements show an isotopic shift to lighter isotopes during Cd transport from the nutrient solution to the plant organs of the Cd-tolerant R. communis and the Cd-hyperaccumulator S. nigrum. The observed isotope fractionation is enriched with the Cd isotope reservoirs in nature. In addition, the variation of the Cd isotopic compositions in leaf and stem differs between R. communis and S. nigrum implying different mechanisms of Cd translocation to the xylem in the Cd-tolerant and -hyperaccumulator species. Cd isotope fractionations of different organs provide new information to identify the chemical processes controlling Cd uptake and translocation in plants and organisms. Plant uptake is an important factor of isotopic variation in the Cd biogeochemical cycle. Thus, Cd isotope fractionation by plants needs to be taken into account in future investigations on environmental pollution using Cd isotopes. Overall, studies on Cd isotopes in plants lay the groundwork for understanding the biogeochemical Cd cycle and mechanisms of plant Cd acquisition and allocation.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Wei, R. et al. Fractionation of Stable Cadmium Isotopes in the Cadmium Tolerant Ricinus communis and Hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum. Sci. Rep. 6, 24309; doi: 10.1038/srep24309 (2016).

Acknowledgments

The research was financially supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (No. 2014CB238906), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (No. 2013AA06A211-2), Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDB15020401), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41201312, 41350110531, 2012Y1ZA0006). The authors thank H. F. Ling, S. Y. Jiang and T. Yang for instrumental support at the Nanjing University, as well as C. P. Okoli and S. B. Wang for reviews that improved the manuscript considerably.

Footnotes

Author Contributions Q.J.G. and H.J.W. proposed and organized the project. R.F.W., Q.J.G. and H.J.W. discussed and designed the experiment. R.F.W., Q.J.G., J.X.Y., M.P., G.X.Z., H.Z.Z., L.Y.T. and X.K.H. carried out the experiments. R.F.W., Q.J.G., H.J.W., C.Q.L., J.H., J.M. and C.W.Z analyzed and interpreted the data together. Q.J.G. and R.F.W. wrote the main manuscript text. M.P. and Y.X.W. revised the manuscript. All the authors participated in discussions of the research.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Exposure to cadmium: a major public health concern, Geneva, Switzerland (2010). [Google Scholar]
  2. Sankaran R. P. & Ebbs S. D. Cadmium accumulation in deer tongue grass (Panicum clandestinum L.) and potential for trophic transfer to microtine rodents. Environ. Pollut. 148, 580–589 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Staessen J. A. et al. Environmental exposure to cadmium, forearm bone density, and risk of fractures: prospective population study. The Lancet 353, 1140–1144 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ali H., Khan E. & Sajad M. A. Phytoremediation of heavy metals-concepts and applications. Chemosphere 91, 869–881 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Huang H. et al. The phytoremediation potential of bioenergy crop Ricinus communis for DDTs and cadmium co-contaminated soil. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 11034–11038 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wiederhold J. G. Metal stable isotope signatures as tracers in environmental geochemistry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 2606–2624 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wojcik M., Sugier P. & Siebielec G. Metal accumulation strategies in plants spontaneously inhabiting Zn-Pb waste deposits. Sci. Total Environ. 487, 313–322 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Garcia-Delgado M., Rodriguez-Cruz M. S., Lorenzo L. F., Arienzo M. & Sanchez-Martin M. J. Seasonal and time variability of heavy metal content and of its chemical forms in sewage sludges from different wastewater treatment plants. Sci. Total Environ. 382, 82–92 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kiczka M., Wiederhold J. G., Kraemer S. M., Bourdon B. & Kretzschmar R. Iron isotope fractionation during Fe uptake and translocation in alpine plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 6144–6150 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guelke M. & Von Blanckenburg F. Fractionation of stable iron isotopes in higher plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 1896–1901 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Moynier F. et al. Isotopic fractionation and transport mechanisms of Zn in plants. Chem. Geol. 267, 125–130 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  12. Viers J. et al. Evidence of Zn isotopic fractionation in a soil-plant system of a pristine tropical watershed (Nsimi, Cameroon). Chem. Geol. 239, 124–137 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  13. Weiss D. J. et al. Isotopic discrimination of zinc in higher plants. New Phytol. 165, 703–710 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jouvin D. et al. Stable isotopes of Cu and Zn in higher plants: evidence for Cu reduction at the root surface and two conceptual models for isotopic fractionation processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 2652–2660 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Weinstein C. et al. Isotopic fractionation of Cu in plants. Chem. Geol. 286, 266–271 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  16. Schmitt A. D. et al. Calcium isotope fractionation during plant growth under a limited nutrient supply. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 110, 70–83 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  17. Hindshaw R. S. et al. Calcium isotope fractionation in alpine plants. Biogeochemistry 112, 373–388 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  18. Cobert F. et al. Experimental identification of Ca isotopic fractionations in higher plants. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 5467–5482 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  19. Cenki-Tok B. et al. The impact of water-rock interaction and vegetation on calcium isotope fractionation in soil- and stream waters of a small, forested catchment (the Strengbach case). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 73, 2215–2228 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  20. von Blanckenburg F., von Wiren N., Guelke M., Weiss D. J. & Bullen T. D. Fractionation of metal stable isotopes by higher plants. Elements 5, 375–380 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  21. Bolou-Bi E. B., Poszwa A., Leyval C. & Vigier N. Experimental determination of magnesium isotope fractionation during higher plant growth. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 74, 2523–2537 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  22. Black J. R., Epstein E., Rains W. D., Yin Q. Z. & Casey W. H. Magnesium-isotope fractionation during plant growth. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 7831–7836 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Deng T. H. et al. Nickel and zinc isotope fractionation in hyperaccumulating and nonaccumulating plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 11926–11933 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wombacher F., Rehkamper M., Mezger K., Bischoff A. & Munker C. Cadmium stable isotope cosmochemistry. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 72, 646–667 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  25. Schediwy S., Rosman K. J. R. & de Laeter J. R. Isotope fractionation of cadmium in lunar material. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 243, 326–335 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  26. Sands D. G., Rosman K. J. R. & de Laeter J. R. A preliminary study of cadmium mass fractionation in lunar soils. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 186, 103–111 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  27. Chrastný V. et al. Cadmium isotope fractionation within the soil profile complicates source identification in relation to Pb-Zn mining and smelting processes. Chem. Geol. 405, 1–9 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  28. Shiel A. E., Weis D. & Orians K. J. Evaluation of zinc, cadmium and lead isotope fractionation during smelting and refining. Sci. Total Environ. 408, 2357–2368 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Cloquet C., Carignan J., Libourel G., Sterckeman T. & Perdrix E. Tracing source pollution in soils using cadmium and lead isotopes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 2525–2530 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gao B. et al. Precise determination of cadmium and lead isotopic compositions in river sediments. Anal. Chim. Acta 612, 114–120 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Conway T. M. & John S. G. Biogeochemical cycling of cadmium isotopes along a high-resolution section through the North Atlantic Ocean. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 148, 269–283 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  32. Georgiev S. V. et al. Cadmium isotopic evidence for increasing primary productivity during the Late Permian anoxic event. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 410, 84–96 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  33. Horner T. J., Lee R. B., Henderson G. M. & Rickaby R. E. Nonspecific uptake and homeostasis drive the oceanic cadmium cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2500–2505 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gault-Ringold M., Adu T., Stirling C. H., Frew R. D. & Hunter K. A. Anomalous biogeochemical behavior of cadmium in subantarctic surface waters: mechanistic constraints from cadmium isotopes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 341–344, 94–103 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  35. Abouchami W. et al. Modulation of the Southern Ocean cadmium isotope signature by ocean circulation and primary productivity. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 305, 83–91 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  36. Schmitt A. D., Galer S. J. G. & Abouchami W. High-precision cadmium stable isotope measurements by double spike thermal ionisation mass spectrometry. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 24, 1079–1088 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  37. Ripperger S. & Rehkamper M. Precise determination of cadmium isotope fractionation in seawater by double spike MC-ICPMS. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 71, 631–642 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  38. Lacan F., Francois R., Ji Y. C. & Sherrell R. M. Cadmium isotopic composition in the ocean. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 70, 5104–5118 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang H. et al. Cadmium accumulation and tolerance of two castor cultivars in relation to antioxidant systems. J. Environ. Sci. (China) 26, 2048–2055 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wei S. H., Zhou Q. X. & Koval P. V. Flowering stage characteristics of cadmium hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. and their significance to phytoremediation. Sci. Total Environ. 369, 441–446 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Chen L. et al. Interaction of Cd-hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. and functional endophyte Pseudomonas sp Lk9 on soil heavy metals uptake. Soil Biol. Biochem. 68, 300–308 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  42. Wei R. et al. An analytical method for precise determination of the cadmium isotopic composition in plant samples using multiple collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Anal. Methods 7, 2479–2487 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  43. Abouchami W. et al. A common reference material for cadmium isotope ctudies-NIST SRM 3108. Geostandard. Geoanal. Res. 37, 5–17 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  44. Aucour A. M., Pichat S., Macnair M. R. & Oger P. Fractionation of stable zinc isotopes in the zinc hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri and nonaccumulator Arabidopsis petraea. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 9212–9217 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Shi G. & Cai Q. Cadmium tolerance and accumulation in eight potential energy crops. Biotechnol. Adv. 27, 555–561 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tang Y. T. et al. Fractionation of stable zinc isotopes in the field-grown zinc hyperaccumulator Noccaea caerulescens and the zinc-tolerant plant Silene vulgaris. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 9972–9979 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Qiu R. L. et al. Mechanisms of Cd hyperaccumulation and detoxification in heavy metal hyperaccumulators: How Plants Cope with Cd. 73, 127–159 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  48. Rodushkin I., Stenberg A., Andren H., Malinovsky D. & Baxter D. C. Isotopic fractionation during diffusion of transition metal ions in solution. Anal. Chem. 76, 2148–2151 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wasylenki L. E., Swihart J. W. & Romaniello S. J. Cadmium isotope fractionation during adsorption to Mn oxyhydroxide at low and high ionic strength. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 140, 212–226 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  50. Sun R. L., Zhou Q. X., Sun F. H. & Jin C. X. Antioxidative defense and proline/phytochelatin accumulation in a newly discovered Cd-hyperaccumulator, Solanum nigrum L. Environ. Exp. Bot. 60, 468–476 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  51. Pallavicini N. et al. Cadmium isotope ratio measurements in environmental matrices by MC-ICP-MS. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 29, 1570–1584 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  52. Wombacher F., Rehkamper M., Mezger K. & Munker C. Stable isotope compositions of cadmium in geological materials and meteorites determined by multiple-collector ICPMS. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 67, 4639–4654 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  53. Lambelet M. et al. Isotopic analysis of Cd in the mixing zone of Siberian rivers with the Arctic Ocean-new constraints on marine Cd cycling and the isotope composition of riverine Cd. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 361, 64–73 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  54. Xue Z., Rehkamper M., Schonbachler M., Statham P. J. & Coles B. J. A new methodology for precise cadmium isotope analyses of seawater. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 402, 883–893 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Yang S. C., Lee D. C. & Ho T. Y. The isotopic composition of cadmium in the water column of the South China Sea. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 98, 66–77 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  56. Ripperger S., Rehkamper M., Porcelli D. & Halliday A. N. Cadmium isotope fractionation in seawater-a signature of biological activity. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 261, 670–684 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  57. Wen H. et al. Tracing sources of pollution in soils from the Jinding Pb-Zn mining district in China using cadmium and lead isotopes. Appl. Geochem. 52, 147–154 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  58. Gao B., Zhou H. D., Liang X. R. & Tu X. L. Cd isotopes as a potential source tracer of metal pollution in river sediments. Environ. Pollut. 181, 340–343 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES