Abstract
Opioids are widely used medicinally as analgesics and abused for hedonic effects, actions that are each complicated by substantial risks such as cardiorespiratory depression. These drugs mimic peptides such as β-endorphin, which has a key role in endogenous analgesia. The β-endorphin in the central nervous system originates from pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) neurons in the arcuate nucleus and nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS). Relatively little is known about the NTSPOMC neurons but their position within the sensory nucleus of the vagus led us to test the hypothesis that they play a role in modulation of cardiorespiratory and nociceptive control. The NTSPOMC neurons were targeted using viral vectors in a POMC-Cre mouse line to express either opto-genetic (channelrhodopsin-2) or chemo-genetic (Pharmacologically Selective Actuator Modules). Opto-genetic activation of the NTSPOMC neurons in the working heart brainstem preparation (n = 21) evoked a reliable, titratable and time-locked respiratory inhibition (120% increase in inter-breath interval) with a bradycardia (125±26 beats per minute) and augmented respiratory sinus arrhythmia (58% increase). Chemo-genetic activation of NTSPOMC neurons in vivo was anti-nociceptive in the tail flick assay (latency increased by 126±65%, p<0.001; n = 8). All effects of NTSPOMC activation were blocked by systemic naloxone (opioid antagonist) but not by SHU9119 (melanocortin receptor antagonist). The NTSPOMC neurons were found to project to key brainstem structures involved in cardiorespiratory control (nucleus ambiguus and ventral respiratory group) and endogenous analgesia (periaqueductal gray and midline raphe). Thus the NTSPOMC neurons may be capable of tuning behaviour by an opioidergic modulation of nociceptive, respiratory and cardiac control.
Introduction
Opioids have been used for several thousand years for their potent mood altering and analgesic properties [2]. These opioid drugs mimic the actions of endogenous peptide neurotransmitters including the endorphin, enkephalin and dynorphin families acting at mu, delta and kappa opioid receptors [3–5]. One of the best characterised of these peptides, β-endorphin [6], has been shown to play roles in endogenous analgesia and stress responses [7] as well as being linked to reward processing [8], feeding [9] and cardiorespiratory regulation [10]. The selective genetic ablation of β-endorphin produces a specific deficit in stress-induced analgesia [11].
Given their analgesic actions, considerable effort has been invested to delineate the characteristics of the opioid peptides and receptor systems with the aim of identifying new targets that may be free of limiting side effects such as cardiorespiratory depression [3]. In contrast with this extensive understanding of opioids and receptors there is considerably less knowledge of the organisation and functional behaviour of β-endorphin releasing neurons.
β-endorphin is a cleavage peptide product of the precursor pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) which is also the precursor of a number of melanocortin peptides such as adrenocorticotrophic hormone and the melanocyte stimulating hormones (including α-MSH). These peptides are differentially produced within neurons by expression of specific cleavage enzymes [12]. POMC is synthesised in neurons located in two main clusters in the mammalian brain—in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus (ARC) and a smaller group of neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) [13–17]. The POMC neurons of the ARC have been shown to play a key role in the regulation of feeding behaviour and energy balance [18]. These actions are mediated predominantly by α-MSH acting via melanocortin-4-receptors [19, 20]. In contrast, the role of the NTS cluster of POMC neurons in metabolic control is less well defined. Their long-term inhibition has little detectable effect on metabolic control or weight regulation, although they seem to play an acute role in satiety [21].
Intriguingly, an opioid-mediated analgesic action can be elicited by stimulation of the NTS or the vagus [10, 22, 23]. There is also evidence that activation of opioid receptors in the NTS can exert potent effects on cardiorespiratory control. This has led to the proposition that opioidergic systems may target the NTS to regulate both nociceptive and autonomic function [10, 24, 25], however, the chemo-architectural complexity and cellular heterogeneity of the NTS has impeded further exploration of this hypothesis. Therefore to test this hypothesis, we used selective opto- and chemo-genetic [1, 26] techniques in POMC-Cre mice [27] to test the hypothesis that the NTSPOMC neurons modulate cardiorespiratory and nociceptive processing, by an opioidergic action. We show that this small cluster of several hundred NTSPOMC neurons extend extensive projections to key autonomic and pain control regions within the brainstem to exert a potent influence on cardiorespiratory control and on nociceptive processing, which is mediated by opioid release.
Materials and Methods
Ethical Approval
All procedures conformed to the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act of 1986 and were approved by the University of Bristol ethical review committee.
Animals
Experiments were performed on adult male and female POMC-Cre-GFP mice. These mice were bred by crossing heterozygous POMC-Cre mice [27], to homozygous B6.Cg-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm3(CAG-EYFP)Hze/J mice (The Jackson Laboratory, stock number 007903). Animals were housed using a standard 12 h light/dark cycle with ad libitum access to food and water.
Stereotaxic Injection of Viral Vectors
Adult mice were anaesthetised using ketamine (70mg/kg, i.p) and medetomidine (0.5mg/kg, i.p) before being positioned in a stereotaxic frame with head angled down (20°). A midline skin incision was made over the dorsal surface of the skull to expose the atlanto-occipital membrane which was also incised. Calamus scriptorius on the dorsal surface of the medulla was used as a reference landmark for the stereotaxic injections. The vector injection procedure used similar methods to Howorth [28] and Hickey [29] and is recapitulated here in brief. The AAV vectors were drawn up into a mineral oil-filled pulled microcapillary pipette with a tip diameter of 20μm. The pipette was inserted at a 35° angle to the vertical axis aiming rostrally, positioned 200μm lateral to the midline at the rostrocaudal level of calamus scriptorius. Microinjections (180nl, over 2 minutes) were made at 4 sites along a single track at the following depths: 1.00, 0.75, 0.50 and 0.25mm below the surface of the medulla. The pipette was left in place for 2 min after each injection. Following viral vector injection the skin was sutured. Atipamezole (1mg/kg, i.p) was administered to reverse anaesthesia and buprenorphine (0.1mg/kg, s.c.) for analgesia. Animals made a rapid recovery after vector injection and any mouse failing to show normal locomotor activity, weight loss >15% or failure to self-care was humanely euthanized (pentobarbital sodium 100mg/kg, i.p). All experiments were performed 3–4 weeks after AAV vector delivery.
Viral Vectors
Three vectors were used in the course of these experiments:
AAV-EF1α-DIO-ChR2-mCherry (UNC Vector Core Services, Chapel Hill, NC; 6x1012 viral particles/ml) was microinjected unilaterally for opto-genetic working heart-brainstem preparation (WHBP) and anatomical tracing experiments. For control animals used in nociceptive testing, this vector was injected bilaterally.
AAV-hSyn-FLEX-Synaptophysin-mCherry (from David Olson, University of Michigan Hospital and Health Systems, MI, USA) was microinjected bilaterally into the NTS. The same gene insert has previously been used in adenoviral vectors for tracing studies [30, 31]. This vector had a titre of 3x1012 virus particles/ml and was diluted 1:1 in sterile PBS on the day of the experiment.
AAV-hSyn-FLEX-PSAM-5HT3 (from Scott Sternson, Janelia Farm Research Campus, VA, USA) was used for the chemo-genetic studies and was microinjected bilaterally into the NTS. The viral titre was 2.8x1012 genome copies/ml and stock was diluted 1:10 with sterile PBS.
Working Heart-Brainstem Preparation
WHBP experiments were performed on AAV-EF1α-DIO-ChR2-mCherry-injected animals. Full details of the WHBP procedures have been previously described [32] and are repeated here in brief. Mice (25-35g) were deeply anaesthetised with halothane (5% in O2), then bisected sub-diaphragmatically and exsanguinated. The head and thorax were cooled by immersion in 5°C Ringer’s solution (composition (in mM): 125 NaCl, 24 NaHCO3, 3 KCl, 2.5 CaCl2, 1.25 MgSO4, 1.25 KH2PO4, and 10 dextrose, pH 7.35–7.4 after carbogenation). The preparation was decerebrated at the pre-collicular level. The phrenic nerves and descending aorta were dissected free of connective tissue and the lungs removed. The ribcage and spinal cord were cut at T8. The cerebellum was removed to expose the dorsal surface of the medulla.
After transfer to the recording chamber, the preparation was positioned prone and a double lumen cannula was inserted into the descending aorta for retrograde perfusion with carbogen-gassed (95% O2, 5% CO2) Ringer’s solution containing Ficoll-70 (1.25%) at 31°C. The second lumen was used to monitor the perfusion pressure in the aorta via a pressure transducer (custom built, Physiology & Pharmacology electronic workshop, University of Bristol, UK). Continuous flow of perfusate was generated from a recycling reservoir (200ml) by a peristaltic pump (Watson-Marlow 505U, Cornwall, UK), at a flow rate of ~11ml/min. The heart resumed beating, usually within 1 min after cannulation as the preparation warmed, and rhythmic respiratory muscle contractions were observed within 2–5 min. The preparation was paralysed by adding a muscle relaxant to the perfusate (vecuronium, 200μg; Norcuron, Cambridge, UK).
Phrenic nerve activity was recorded using a glass bipolar suction electrode to monitor central respiratory activity. The preparation was tuned to obtain a robust eupnoeic pattern of phrenic nerve activity by adjusting perfusate flow and vascular resistance (with addition of vasopressin (100-200nM)) to obtain a perfusion pressure of ~70mmHg. Once the preparation had been tuned, little further adjustment was usually required and preparations remained stable for recordings for a further 2–4 h. Preparations that were not stable, as determined by a loss of the peripheral chemoreflex or arterial baroreflex responses, were excluded from analysis.
At the end of each WHBP experiment, the brainstem was immersed in formaldehyde (4% in 0.1M PB) for 48 h before transfer to PBS-azide (0.02% azide in 0.1M PBS) until required for histological analysis (see below).
Data acquisition
The ECG was recorded using three 23-gauge needle electrodes. Custom built AC amplifiers (Physiology & Pharmacology electronic workshop, University of Bristol, UK) were used to record phrenic nerve activity and ECG. The signals were AC amplified (phrenic, x10-20 k; ECG, x5k) and band pass filtered (phrenic, 500 Hz to 3kHz; ECG, 50Hz to 3kHz). Instantaneous heart rate was triggered from the R wave of the ECG signal using a window discriminator. Signals were collected using an analogue to digital converter (micro1401, CED, Cambridge, UK) connected to a computer running Spike2 software (CED); data was acquired and displayed using custom scripts in Spike2.
Opto-stimulation of NTSPOMC neurons
Opto-stimulation of NTS ChR2-mCherry transduced neurons was achieved by positioning a 200μm optic fibre (FT200-UMT 0.39 numerical aperture, Thorlabs, Newton, NJ) vertically over the dorsal surface of the medulla positioned at 200μm lateral and 200μm rostral to calamus scriptorius, on the side of prior vector microinjection. The light-source was a 445nm LED laser (PhoxX 445, Omicron, Taunusstein, Germany), which was controlled by Omicron Control Centre software (v2.1.4). The transduced cells were driven with 20ms light pulses at 2-20Hz and 0.6–9.1mW (exiting the fibre). The optic fibre was calibrated before each experiment using an optical power meter (PM100D, Thorlabs, Dachau, Germany).
To allow aggregation of the cardiovascular and respiratory responses, a ‘standard stimulation’ was used: the optic fibre was driven with light pulses (20ms) at 10Hz with an intensity of 4.6mW for 10s. These parameters were chosen as the standard stimulation because it repeatedly evoked cardiorespiratory responses in pilot experiments in the WHBP. The effects of opto-stimulation were assayed on heart rate, phrenic nerve activity and perfusion pressure and the response was considered stable when three repeated stimuli produced reproducible cardiorespiratory responses. To investigate the dose-dependency of responses, the NTS was illuminated with pulses (20ms) at a fixed intensity of 4.6mW, with varying frequencies (2Hz, 5Hz, 10Hz and 20Hz) or at a fixed frequency of 10Hz, with graded intensities relative to the standard stimulus (12.5%, 25%, 50% and 200%). A sham stimulus was also used to act as a control period (no illumination). To prevent desensitisation of ChR2 (Lin, 2011), all stimulations were separated by a minimum of 2–3 min.
Cardiorespiratory analysis
Grouped data are presented as heart rate (bpm), interbreath interval (s) and respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA, bpm). The heart rate response was analysed by comparing the mean heart rate of a 10s baseline period, immediately before the stimulation commenced, and the minimum heart rate value during the stimulation period. The respiratory response was analysed by comparing the longest interbreath interval during the response (the apnoea) with the baseline interbreath interval (the mean of nine interbreath intervals immediately before the stimulation began). RSA was measured by comparing the mean baseline RSA before with the mean RSA during and into the period immediately following the stimulation. Each mean RSA was calculated by taking the peak-to-trough variations in heart rate across 4 consecutive respiratory cycles. In all cases this was also referenced against a period of sham stimulation (no illumination).
Nociceptive Testing
Nociceptive testing was performed using the tail-flick test on POMC-Cre-GFP mice that had received NTS microinjections of either AAV-hSyn-FLEX-PSAM-5HT3 (PSAM mice) or AAV-EF1α-DIO-ChR2-mCherry (control vector; ChR2-control mice). Following surgery, the experimenter was blinded to the group allocation.
For the tail-flick test, mice were restrained by scruffing and a 2cm distal portion of the tail was immersed into a 52°C temperature-controlled water bath (custom built by the Physiology & Pharmacology electronic workshop, University of Bristol, UK). Mice responded with an abrupt withdrawal movement of the tail and the ‘tail-flick latency’ was recorded. The assay was repeated at 15 min intervals to prevent sensitisation and a 20s cut-off point to end the assay was chosen to prevent tissue damage.
An i.p. injection of the PSEM89S ligand, was used to activate PSAM-5HT3 receptors [1]. PSEM89S was dissolved in sterile saline (at 9.2mM or 27.5mM) on the day of the experiment. The experimenter was blinded to the identity of the drug/vehicle. Three baseline latencies were measured before i.p. injection of PSEM89S (30mg/kg or 90mg/kg) or saline. Four measurements were then taken over the following hour (every 15 min) to measure the time-course of drug action. In some experiments, naloxone was injected (1mg/kg i.p.) 10 min prior to PSEM89S injection. Naloxone hydrochloride (Tocris, Bristol, UK) was made up on the day of the experiment in sterile saline to a concentration of 550μM.
Data are presented as a percentage change in tail-flick latency from baseline, which was calculated as the mean tail-flick latency of the first and second tail-flick latencies before drug dosing. The third baseline measurement was included in graphs to display a time-course of the effect of PSEM89S.
Tissue fixation
All mice for histological analysis were killed with a lethal dose of pentobarbital sodium (Euthatal, 100mg/kg, i.p.) and transcardially perfused with 18ml of formaldehyde (4% in 0.1M PB, pH 7.4). The brain was removed and post-fixed overnight and then transferred to a cryoprotectant (30% sucrose in 0.1M PB) for a minimum of 24h at 4°C.
Immunohistochemistry
Brains were coronally sectioned on a freezing microtome (at 40μm intervals) into 4 series and free-floating immunohistochemistry was performed at room temperature on a shaking platform (RA Lamb, UK). Sections were washed 3 times in 0.1M PB for 10 min and permeabilised in ethanol (50% in distilled H2O) for 30 min. 3 additional washes were then done in 0.1M PB for 10 min. The tissue was incubated overnight with primary antibodies against GFP (polyclonal chicken anti-GFP, 1:5000; Abcam, UK), mCherry (monoclonal rat anti-RFP, 1:4000; Chromotek, Planegg, Germany) or ChAT (polyclonal goat anti-ChAT, 1:400; Merck Millipore, Nottingham, UK) in 0.1M PB containing 5% horse serum (Sigma, UK) and 0.3% Triton X-100 (Sigma, Dorset, UK). Sections were washed 3 times, then incubated for 3-4h with appropriate secondary antibodies conjugated to fluorophores (Alexa Fluor 488 and Alexa Fluor 594, 1:1000; Invitrogen, Warrington, UK) in 0.1M PB containing 2% horse serum and 0.3% Triton X-100. For experiments requiring dual immunohistochemistry for mCherry and ChAT, an anti-rat biotinylated secondary antibody (1:500; Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, UK) was used followed by a 3h tertiary incubation of Streptavidin Alexa Fluor 594 (1:1000; Invitrogen, Warrington, UK). Sections were washed and mounted onto electrostatically charged glass microscope slides (Superfrost Plus slides, Menzel-Glaser; Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK) and cover slipped (Menzel-Glaser; Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK) with fluorescence mounting media (FluorSave Reagent; Merck Millipore, Nottingham, UK). Negative controls were routinely run by omitting primary antibodies.
Microscopy
Sections were examined using a Zeiss Axioskop 2 fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with a pE-2 LED excitation system (CoolLED, UK) light source. The excitation LEDs and excitation-emission filter cubes used were: (i) excitation LED 490nm/filter cube #10 (Carl Zeiss) was used for Alexa Fluor 488; (ii) excitation LED 565nm/custom made filter cube (excitation 560/40nm, dichroic 585nm, emission 630/75nm (Zeiss)) was used for Alexa Fluor 594/mCherry. Images were captured using an AxioCam camera and processed using Axiovision 4.7 software (Carl Zeiss, Cambridge, UK). Brightfield/darkfield images of sections were also captured to identify their rostro-caudal position.
Confocal microscopy and imaging was performed on selected areas of the medulla to obtain z-stacks, which allowed better visualisation of potential co-localisation of ChAT immuno-reactivity with mCherry. A Leica SP5-AOBS confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica Microsystems, Milton Keynes, UK) was used to take confocal stacks. Green fluorescent labelling (Alexa Fluor 488) was visualised with a 100mW Argon laser (488nm). Red fluorescent labelling (native mCherry or Alexa Fluor 594) was visualised with a 2mW Orange HeNe 594nm laser. Images were taken using x20 and x40 oil immersion objectives and Leica LAS AF software. A line average of 4 was used to reduce background noise.
Figure preparation
For figures, phrenic nerve activity was rectified and smoothed (time constant = 50ms). Microscope images were optimised for brightness/contrast where necessary using Fiji ImageJ [33]. To present a large area of a coronal section of the medulla at a suitable magnification to see neuronal fibres, several images were taken at the same exposure and stitched together using Fiji ImageJ. All figures were prepared and annotated in Adobe Illustrator CS5 software.
Histological Analysis
The distribution of Syp-mCherry puncta, revealed after mCherry immunohistochemistry, was mapped throughout the brainstem. A total of 8 coronal sections across the medulla of each brain were visualised (bregma -6.48mm to -8.12mm) and the density was mapped onto the corresponding section from the mouse brain atlas (Franklin & Paxinos, 2007). The densities of puncta in each region were rated on a numerical scale as 0—absent, 1—moderate, 2—high or 3—very high. The density in each region was averaged for each of the 8 rostro-caudal levels across animals to give an overall density. These densities were represented using a colour-coded scale, onto mouse brain atlas sections using Adobe Illustrator CS5. Sections throughout the pons and midbrain were also mapped and more rostral sections were examined for the presence of puncta.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as means ± standard error of the mean. Data sets were analysed for statistical significance using Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). The normality of data was assessed using the D’Agostino-Pearson test and parametric or non-parametric testing chosen accordingly. Student’s paired t-tests, Wilcoxon matched pairs signed ranks test (both two-tailed) or Friedman tests with Dunn’s post-tests were used to determine statistical differences for WHBP data. Two-way repeated measures ANOVAs were used to analyse behavioural data, followed by Bonferroni post-tests. Differences were considered significant at p<0.05.
Materials
All salts and drugs were from Sigma unless otherwise stated. Naloxone hydrochloride (Tocris, Bristol, UK; stock solution 2mM in dH2O) and SHU9119 (Bachem, Weil am Rheim, Germany; stock solution 186μM in PBS) were administered systemically by addition to the circulating perfusate.
Results
To selectively express Cre-recombinase and enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) in POMC neurons (POMC-Cre-GFP mice) we crossed POMC-Cre mice [27] with reporter mice (Tg(Gt(ROSA)26Sor-EGFP)). The fluorescent neurons in this POMC-Cre-GFP mouse line have previously been shown by in situ hybridisation to express mRNA for POMC in both the ARC and the NTS (see Allen Mouse Brain Atlas, http://tinyurl.com/Allen-Brain-Atlas-POMC-NTS). To allow opto-genetic activation of NTSPOMC neurons we expressed a channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-mCherry fusion protein by unilateral stereotaxic microinjection of a Cre-dependent adeno-associated viral vector (AAV-EF1α-DIO-ChR2-mCherry) [34]. Subsequent post-hoc histological analysis showed native mCherry fluorescence in the somata and processes of a discrete subgroup of NTS neurons (Fig 1A, 3–4 weeks after injection). The average number of transduced neurons was 234±39 per animal (n = 6). The mCherry expression was co-localised with GFP indicating successful transduction of NTSPOMC neurons (Fig 1B–1D). Almost all of the mCherry-labelled neurons (95%, n = 6) were found within the NTS caudal to obex (from bregma -7.48 to -8.00mm) being distributed preferentially in the commissural, medial, ventral, ventrolateral and dorsolateral subnuclei—regions of the NTS known to be involved in nociceptive and cardiorespiratory reflex control [24, 25].
NTSPOMC neurons have projection targets throughout the brainstem
To identify the projection targets of the NTSPOMC neurons we took advantage of the propensity of the ChR2-mCherry fusion protein to outline the axonal processes of the transduced neurons. The NTSPOMC neurons extended varicose axonal projections from the NTS ventrally into the medulla. The fine terminal axons were demonstrated within the distal target areas by immunohistochemical amplification of mCherry fluorescence. In the coronal plane, the axons travelled along two distinct tracks from the NTS (Fig 1E); each emerging from the lateral NTS with streams of fibres projecting, without branching, ventrolaterally and ventromedially. The axons coursing ventromedially projected through the medullary reticular nucleus and hypoglossal nucleus, heading ventrally along the midline to the nucleus raphe obscurus (Fig 1F). The ventrolaterally-directed axons projected through the medullary and intermediate reticular nuclei towards the ventrolateral medulla (VLM, Fig 1G). These axons within the VLM (n = 4 mice) were distributed as a network of branching terminal fibres extending throughout the nucleus ambiguus (NA), rostral ventral respiratory group, caudo-ventrolateral reticular nucleus, lateral reticular nucleus, pre-Bötzinger complex and lateral paragigantocellular nucleus (Fig 2). The fibres in the VLM were densest in the caudal medulla (bregma -7.48mm to -7.92mm) at a similar rostrocaudal level in the medulla to the POMC somata within the NTS but were also found in more rostral sections (up to the caudal end of the facial nucleus, bregma -6.5mm). The presence of fine axonal branches in these key brainstem cardiorespiratory and nociceptive control regions raised the question of whether the NTSPOMC neurons were making synaptic contacts.
To examine whether this distribution of axonal fibres actually reflected the location of synaptic terminals of NTSPOMC neurons, we stereotaxically microinjected a Cre-dependent AAV vector to express synaptophysin-mCherry fusion protein (AAV-hSyn-FLEX-Syp-mCherry) into the NTS of POMC-Cre-GFP mice. This produced a similar pattern of expression of Syp-mCherry (as had previously been seen with the ChR2-mCherry vector) in the somata of a discrete subset of neurons at the injection site (Fig 3A, 264±13, n = 4). The majority of these Syp-mCherry-labelled somata were found in the NTS (87%) in sections caudal to obex.
Numerous Syp-mCherry-containing puncta (~0.5–1μm in diameter) were visible within the NTS (Fig 3B) and brainstem. These puncta had a consistent distribution across mice (n = 4) and were concentrated in the same brainstem territories that contained the projection fibres of the NTSPOMC neurons (as documented above). The distribution and comparative densities of NTSPOMC neuronal puncta is summarised in Fig 3D (n = 3). The highest densities of puncta were found in the caudal NTS close to the injection site: specifically in the commissural, ventrolateral, ventral, medial, dorsolateral, dorsomedial and intermediate subnuclei and in the underlying dorsal vagal motor nucleus (DMV, Fig 3C). Puncta were found at moderate density throughout the rest of the rostro-caudal extent of the NTS and DMV (Fig 3D). High densities of puncta were also found in the medulla outside the vagal complex in the VLM caudal to obex, including the NA, rostral ventral respiratory group and caudal ventrolateral medulla and also in the hypoglossal nucleus. Moderate densities of puncta were noted in the raphe obscurus; caudal part of the lateral paragigantocellular nucleus; rostral ventrolateral medulla; and in the region of the pre-Bötzinger and Bötzinger complexes (Fig 3D, n = 3).
More rostrally in the pons and midbrain, a moderate density of puncta was found in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG); lateral parabrachial nucleus (lPBN); Kölliker-Fuse nucleus and external part of the medial parabrachial nucleus (Fig 3D, n = 3). This indicates that in addition to ventrolateral and ventromedial tracts of NTSPOMC neuronal fibres, there is also a rostral tract of POMC neuronal fibres that project from the NTS to the dorsal pons and midbrain. Examination of brain territories ranging from the midbrain (bregma -4.60mm) through to the frontal lobes (bregma +2.80mm) did not reveal any further puncta.
Activation of NTSPOMC neurons evokes bradycardia, augments respiratory sinus arrhythmia and causes bradypnoea
The pattern of NTSPOMC neuronal projections to key cardiorespiratory centres such as the NA, ventral respiratory group and the raphe suggested a role in autonomic regulation alongside the hypothesised role in the regulation of pain. We therefore used the working heart brainstem preparation (WHBP) to examine the effect of opto-stimulation of NTSPOMC neurons on cardiorespiratory control in mice that had received unilateral stereotaxic NTS microinjections of AAV-EF1α-DIO-ChR2-mCherry. The WHBP is an arterially perfused decerebrate preparation [32] facilitating access to the brainstem (without the confound of anaesthesia) while allowing simultaneous recording of ECG, phrenic nerve activity and perfusion pressure (Fig 4A). NTSPOMC neurons were activated by illumination from an optic fibre placed on the dorsal surface of the brainstem at the rostrocaudal level of calamus scriptorius (200μm lateral to midline), immediately above the vector injection site (Fig 4B).
Opto-stimulation (using a standardised stimulus—10Hz, 4.6mW for 10s) produced stereotyped cardiorespiratory responses, consisting of a bradycardia and transient apnoea (Fig 4C). The amplitude of RSA (the vagally-mediated, respiratory related fluctuation in heart rate) was also increased by opto-stimulation. These responses were time locked to the stimulus, had a short latency to onset and each recovered to baseline when opto-stimulation ended. Group analysis of the response to this pattern of opto-stimulation showed a bradycardia (amplitude = 125±26 beats per minute, bpm); from a baseline of 472±9 bpm to 348±31 bpm (p = 0.0001, n = 21 mice, paired t-test; Fig 4D). The latency to onset of the bradycardia was 1.1±0.2s (n = 21), and it lasted for the period of opto-stimulation. RSA was augmented by opto-stimulation with an increase in peak-to-trough amplitude from 47±15 to 71±15 bpm (p = 0.0012, n = 20, Wilcoxon signed rank test; Fig 4E). Opto-stimulation also produced a transient apnoea with slowing of the respiratory rate. The interbreath interval increased from 4.1±0.5s to 9.0±1.1s during stimulation (p<0.0001, n = 21, Wilcoxon signed rank test; Fig 4F) with no significant change in the amplitude of the phrenic nerve activity or the duration of inspiration (Fig 4G and 4H).
All cardiorespiratory responses were reproducible on repeated opto-stimulation without evidence of desensitisation and their duration could be prolonged if the period of stimulation was extended (e.g. 1 min). These cardiorespiratory responses were all dependent on the frequency (2-20Hz) and intensity of stimulation, with higher frequencies and intensities of opto-stimulation producing a larger bradycardia, longer duration of apnoea and an increase in RSA (Fig 5). The effects of opto-stimulation were only obtained from illumination sites over the caudal region of the NTS and progressively diminished when the optic fibre was moved rostrally.
Cardiorespiratory responses to opto-stimulation of NTSPOMC neurons are opioid-mediated
POMC neurons are thought to signal through the release of the peptide cleavage products of POMC, potentially including β-endorphin and/or melanocortins. Therefore, to test the hypothesis that the cardiorespiratory responses to activation of NTSPOMC neurons are mediated by an opioid, the antagonist naloxone was added to the circulating perfusate. The opto-stimulation-evoked bradycardia, increased RSA and bradypnoea were all diminished in the presence of naloxone (1μM and 5μM, Fig 6A).
Naloxone (at both 1 and 5μM) attenuated the bradycardia (from -40.6±10.9 to -7.2±1.9 bpm (5μm), p<0.05; Fig 6B), which recovered following washout (to -47.2±7.4 bpm; p<0.05, 5μM naloxone vs. washout; Friedman test (p = 0.0001) with Dunn’s post tests for each condition; n = 6). Naloxone also reduced the augmentation of RSA by opto-stimulation (Fig 6C) from 16.3±5.5 pre-naloxone to 3.7±0.7 bpm in the presence of the opioid antagonist (1μM). Increasing the dose of naloxone to 5μM further attenuated the RSA response (to 2.5±0.5 bpm, p<0.01 vs baseline) and the opto-stimulation-evoked augmentation of RSA returned following washout of naloxone (to 14.2±3.4 bpm; p<0.01; Friedman test (p<0.0001) with Dunn’s post tests; n = 6). Additionally, naloxone reduced the bradypnoeic effect of opto-stimulation (Fig 6D). Opto-stimulation induced a 105±31% increase in interbreath interval, which was significantly reduced by naloxone (1μM) (70±22%; p<0.05, Friedman test (p = 0.043) with Dunn’s post test; n = 6). 5μM naloxone did not further reduce the change in interbreath interval and the respiratory response did not recover after 30 minutes of naloxone washout. Naloxone alone had no significant effect on either baseline heart rate or respiratory frequency (Fig 7, n = 6).
The reversible block of the opto-stimulation-evoked cardiorespiratory responses by naloxone supports a role for an endogenous opioid peptide in the mediation of these responses. However, given that α-MSH has been found in cell bodies in the NTS [35], we examined the effect of SHU9119, an antagonist of MC3 and MC4 receptors—the main melanocortin receptors expressed in the brain [36], on the evoked cardiorespiratory responses. The dose of SHU9119 was chosen based on prior in vitro brainstem slice experiments that blocked melanocortin agonist effects in the NTS (1μM SHU9119, [37]) and dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (0.5μM SHU9119, [38]). The addition of SHU9119 (2μM) to the perfusate had no effect on the cardiorespiratory responses to opto-stimulation of NTSPOMC neurons (Fig 8, n = 7). These data indicate that the cardiorespiratory responses to NTSPOMC opto-stimulation are not mediated by α-MSH.
POMC neurons project to vagal preganglionic neurons in the nucleus ambiguus
The NA is of particular interest because it contains the preganglionic cardiac vagal motor neurons (CVNs), located in the external formation [39, 40] and mediate the parasympathetic control of heart rate. We hypothesised that the bradycardia and augmentation of RSA seen on opto-stimulation may therefore be mediated by NTSPOMC neuronal projections to the NA. To investigate this, direct opto-stimulation over the NA was performed in preparations that had previously shown cardiorespiratory responses to opto-stimulation over the NTS. The optic fibre was then repositioned to sit above the NA in order to activate ChR2 in the terminals of NTSPOMC neurons (Fig 9A). In each case opto-stimulation over the NA (10Hz, 4.6mW) elicited bradycardia, accompanied by a transient apnoea or slowed respiratory frequency (n = 3, Fig 9B).
These cardiorespiratory responses to opto-stimulation over the NA were supported by anatomical tracing experiments, which showed dense labelling of NTSPOMC neuronal fibres (Fig 9C) and puncta (Fig 9E) in the NA. Both ChR2-mCherry axons and Syp-mCherry puncta in the NA were found most densely in sections caudal to obex and were seen to extend ventrolaterally outside of the compact, semi-compact and loose formations to the external formation of the NA, which is where the CVNs are found. NTSPOMC fibres and puncta were noted to be concentrated in the territory of NA cholinergic vagal preganglionic neurons (Fig 9D–9F). These combined anatomical and functional data suggests that POMC neurons project to the NA to modulate heart rate by vagal activation.
Pharmaco-activation of NTSPOMC neurons is analgesic
To investigate whether NTSPOMC neurons also have a role in analgesia, we used a chemo-genetic approach [1] with expression of an engineered ion channel to allow targeted neuronal activation with a selective agonist. One group of mice received stereotaxic microinjections of the Cre-dependent vector AAV-hSyn-FLEX-PSAM-5HT3 (from the Sternson lab, see [1], PSAM group). This enabled expression of a modified α7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ligand binding domain fused to a 5-HT3 receptor ion pore (PSAM-5HT3). Nociceptive responses were examined in PSAM mice using the tail-flick assay (chosen for its known sensitivity to exogenous opioids [41–45] and to NTS stimulation [22, 46, 47]). Systemic administration of the selective PSAM receptor ligand, PSEM89S, was used to activate the NTSPOMC neurons.
Chemo-genetic activation of NTSPOMC neurons (PSEM89S, 90mg/kg, i.p.) exerted an antinociceptive action with an increase in withdrawal latency seen at 30 min (PSEM89S = 110±40% vs saline = -9±5%; p<0.001) and at 45 min (PSEM89S = 126±65% vs saline = -15±6%; p<0.001; n = 8 per group; 2-way repeated measures ANOVA (p = 0.0002) with Bonferroni post-tests; Fig 10A). The tail-flick latency had recovered to baseline levels by 60 min.
To investigate if the PSEM89S-evoked analgesia was opioid-mediated, naloxone (1mg/kg i.p.) was given 10 min prior to PSEM89S injection. Pre-treatment with naloxone completely blocked the increase in tail-flick latency seen following injection of PSEM89S (n = 8; Fig 10A). Naloxone only had an effect on tail-flick latencies in animals given PSEM89S (as opposed to saline) and did not have a pro-nociceptive effect in its own right. These data suggest that the increased tail-flick latency following PSEM89S injection is opioid-mediated and the magnitude of the PSEM89S analgesia was equivalent to that produced by morphine (3mg/kg, i.p.) in naïve mice (Fig 10C).
Control experiments in POMC-Cre-GFP mice that had received NTS microinjections of a comparable control vector AAV-EF1α-DIO-ChR2-mCherry (ChR2-control mice) showed no change in tail flick latencies after PSEM89S injection (90mg/kg) compared to saline injection (n = 8; Fig 10B). Taken together, these data suggest that the increased tail-flick latencies seen following PSEM89S injection are due to specific activation of PSAM receptors expressed on the NTSPOMC neurons.
Discussion
Using a combination of viral vector-mediated transduction of genetic actuators with Cre-recombinase targeting [27] we show that activation of the small cluster of POMC neurons (two to three hundred cells) in the NTS exerts strong effects on cardiorespiratory control and on nociceptive processing. These actions are all sensitive to naloxone indicating their mediation by an opioidergic mechanism, consistent with the release of β-endorphin from the POMC neurons. This identifies the NTSPOMC neurons as being a component of a neural circuit enabling the coordinated regulation of nociception and cardiorespiratory control.
The NTSPOMC cells are projection neurons [15, 16, 48] and we show that they selectively target a number of important brainstem territories involved in cardiovascular, respiratory, autonomic and sensory control allowing them to potentially produce co-ordinated poly-modal regulation (Fig 11). These brainstem POMC neurons have been reported to be involved in signalling satiety [21, 49] but our findings extend their remit to encompass novel roles. Their activation engages a coordinated set of autonomic, motor and sensory changes. This composite response has many features common to those seen following the systemic administration of opioids, which include analgesia, respiratory slowing, bradycardia and increased RSA [3, 50–52].
Direct chemical or electrical stimulation of the NTS produces an analgesic effect [46, 53, 54] that is sensitive to opioid antagonists [10]. Similar analgesic effects are produced by stimulation of vagal nerve afferents in animals [55], in patients with vagal nerve stimulators (implanted for epilepsy) [23, 56] and in healthy volunteers following transcutaneous vagal stimulation [57]. Given that NTSPOMC neurons receive direct vagal afferent excitatory inputs [49], and their activation produces a naloxone-sensitive antinociceptive action, they form a credible circuit substrate for this stimulation-evoked analgesia.
This antinociceptive action could be generated by opioid release from POMC terminals in a number of brainstem sites, including at the level of the NTS itself, or the parabrachial nucleus to modulate ascending nociceptive information, or via descending influences to the spinal cord relayed via terminals in the PAG or the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) [8]. These observations raise the question of whether stress-evoked analgesia, which is sensitive to genetic ablation of β-endorphin [11] may also be mediated via the NTSPOMC neurons (as well as or instead of those in the ARC). The stress-analgesia circuit is known to involve structures such as the amygdala, hypothalamus and the PAG [7], which have all been recently shown by rabies trans-synaptic labelling to innervate the NTSPOMC neurons [48]. Thus the appropriate circuit connectivity exists allowing NTSPOMC neurons to potentially play a role in stress-induced analgesia. We also note that the PAG innervation from the NTSPOMC neurons appears to be predominantly to the ventrolateral column, which is intriguing as stimulation of that PAG territory produces an opioidergic analgesia accompanied by bradycardia and respiratory slowing [58]–all features seen on activation of the NTSPOMC neurons.
Activation of NTSPOMC neurons produced a rapid-onset bradycardia and an augmentation of RSA that was blocked by naloxone. This is likely to reflect an excitation of CVNs located in the NA [39, 40]. We have demonstrated that NTSPOMC neurons project to the NA and their terminals are found in close vicinity to cholinergic preganglionic neurons, which suggests that they could release β-endorphin onto the preganglionics. Such a projection of β-endorphin containing fibres from the NTS to the ventrolateral medulla, including the NA, has previously been demonstrated using immunocytochemistry and tract lesions [16]. We note, however, that the postsynaptic action of opioids is a canonical inhibition mediated by activation of potassium channels and closure of voltage gated calcium channels [3]. Indeed this effect has been documented for exogenous μ-opioid receptor agonists applied to CVNs in vitro [59], so this would not account for the excitation seen following NTSPOMC neuronal opto-stimulation. An alternative putative mechanism would be a presynaptic inhibition of GABA/glycinergic interneurons that leads to disinhibition of the vagal preganglionic neurons. This motif has been reported for opioid actions at a number of pain processing sites including the RVM and PAG [8, 53, 60]. As CVNs are known to have a tonic level of inhibition originating from nearby interneurons [61], which can be inhibited by the application of exogenous opioids in vitro [62, 63], then this opioid-mediated presynaptic inhibition would account for the increased vagal outflow. A previous opto-genetic study of hypothalamic POMC neurons demonstrated a comparable presynaptic inhibitory action on synaptic inputs to Agouti-related peptide neurons, mediated by an opioidergic mechanism [64]. It is apparent from our data that the bradycardia is phasically entrained to the respiratory drive, suggesting that it reflects an input from the respiratory pattern generator. However, the precise details of this mechanism, and its regulation by opioids, will require recordings from the local circuits in the ventral brainstem.
Opto-stimulation of NTSPOMC neurons produced a slowing of the respiratory rate, often with a period of apnoea, which was naloxone sensitive. This respiratory slowing was not accompanied by reductions in the amplitude or duration of inspiratory phrenic discharge (analogous to tidal volume). Thus this opioid-mediated action is similar to that seen with systemic administration of opioids in man; namely that an effect on frequency is seen before any reduction in tidal volume [52, 65]. The site of these effects of opioids on the central respiratory networks have been the focus of on-going debate [66, 67], and there is evidence that they can act within the pre-Bötzinger nucleus to produce a decrease in respiratory frequency [68], potentially by a postsynaptic inhibition of respiratory pattern generator neurons. We found that the axons and terminals of NTSPOMC neurons are found throughout much of the length of the ventral respiratory column indicating that they may be able to exert actions both within and outside the pre-Bötzinger complex. It may also be relevant that there was innervation within the pons to the region of the Kölliker-Fuse nucleus, which regulates respiratory pattern generation and is known to be opioid sensitive [69]. Preliminary evidence indicates that the Kölliker-Fuse nucleus may also be involved in the generation of RSA [70]. Such opto-genetic targeting of the NTSPOMC neurons may allow the role of these distinct territories to be tested by direct light activation over terminal fields, as we showed for the NA. Similarly the combination of selective opioid antagonists with the focal opto-activation may enable the specific receptor mechanisms mediating these actions to be determined.
Given that the NTSPOMC neurons receive direct inputs from visceral vagal afferents (Appleyard et al., 2005) and acutely signal satiety [21, 49] the findings of the current study raise the question of whether they could also be part of the circuit involved in feeding-associated (Mason and Foo, 2009) or sweet-taste analgesia [71], which are components of a hierarchical response that prioritises food acquisition over nocifensive behaviour. These responses have been explored in a number of different paradigms and there are some commonalities such as the involvement of the NTS (Anseloni et al., 2005), opioidergic mechanisms [72, 73] and an action via the RVM [72, 74]. Thus the NTSPOMC neurons could also have a role in feeding-associated analgesia as well as in stress-induced analgesia.
This small population of NTSPOMC neurons (200–300) can produce potent opioid-receptor-mediated changes in cardiorespiratory control and nocifensive behaviour that are similar to those seen with systemic opioid administration (equivalent to morphine 3mg/kg). These neurons may be part of endogenous analgesic circuits engaged in specific behavioural contexts to elicit a co-ordinated set of autonomic changes that produce a state of vagal predominance. It remains to be determined whether these neurons are indeed necessary for the expression of these behaviours and this will require targeted subtractive genetic manipulations to ablate or inhibit their function. A final question that merits consideration is whether NTSPOMC neurons constitute a homogenous population or whether there are functional sub-specialisations, even amongst a group of several hundred cells, as may be suggested by the presence of distinct, unbranching projection tracts that extend from the NTS through the brainstem to the diverse targets.
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our gratitude to Scott Sternson, Karl Deisseroth and David Olson for generously providing viral vectors and PSEM ligand. We thank Graeme Henderson, for his discussions around experimental design and advice during the conduct of the study. We would also like to thank Laura Powell and Katy Davis for assisting with histology and microscopy.
Abbreviations
- POMC
pro-opiomelanocortin
- NTS
Nucleus of the solitary tract
- ARC
Arcuate nucleus
- α-MSH
alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone
- EGFP
enhanced green fluorescent protein
- ChR2
channelrhodopsin-2
- PSAM
Pharmacologically selective actuator module (after [1])
- PSEM89S
Pharmacologically selective effector molecule 89S [1]
Data Availability
All data files are available from the University of Bristol research data repository "data.bris" at data.bris.ac.uk.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by Wellcome Trust, gr088373, AEP; http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/ and Medical Research Council, in vivo PhD studentship, SC; http://www.mrc.ac.uk/. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Magnus CJ, Lee PH, Atasoy D, Su HH, Looger LL, Sternson SM. Chemical and genetic engineering of selective ion channel-ligand interactions. Science. 2011;333(6047):1292–6. Epub 2011/09/03. 333/6047/1292 [pii] 10.1126/science.1206606 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stannard CF, Coupe M, Pickering AE. Opioids: A brief History. Opioids in Non-cancer pain. 2nd ed Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Corbett AD, Henderson G, McKnight AT, Paterson SJ. 75 years of opioid research: the exciting but vain quest for the Holy Grail. British journal of pharmacology. 2006;147 Suppl 1:S153–62. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Benarroch EE. Endogenous opioid systems: current concepts and clinical correlations. Neurology. 2012;79(8):807–14. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182662098 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Millan MJ. Multiple opioid systems and pain. Pain. 1986;27(3):303–47. Epub 1986/12/01. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cox BM, Goldstein A, Hi CH. Opioid activity of a peptide, beta-lipotropin-(61–91), derived from beta-lipotropin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1976;73(6):1821–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Butler RK, Finn DP. Stress-induced analgesia. Progress in neurobiology. 2009;88(3):184–202. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.04.003 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fields H. State-dependent opioid control of pain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5(7):565–75. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Appleyard SM, Hayward M, Young JI, Butler AA, Cone RD, Rubinstein M, et al. A role for the endogenous opioid beta-endorphin in energy homeostasis. Endocrinology. 2003;144(5):1753–60. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lewis JW, Baldrighi G, Akil H. A possible interface between autonomic function and pain control: opioid analgesia and the nucleus tractus solitarius. Brain research. 1987;424(1):65–70. Epub 1987/10/20. 0006-8993(87)91193-0 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rubinstein M, Mogil JS, Japon M, Chan EC, Allen RG, Low MJ. Absence of opioid stress-induced analgesia in mice lacking beta-endorphin by site-directed mutagenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1996;93(9):3995–4000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bicknell AB. The tissue-specific processing of pro-opiomelanocortin. Journal of neuroendocrinology. 2008;20(6):692–9. 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01709.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Watson SJ, Akil H, Richard CW 3rd, Barchas JD. Evidence for two separate opiate peptide neuronal systems. Nature. 1978;275(5677):226–8. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Joseph SA, Pilcher WH, Bennett-Clarke C. Immunocytochemical localization of ACTH perikarya in nucleus tractus solitarius: evidence for a second opiocortin neuronal system. Neuroscience letters. 1983;38(3):221–5. Epub 1983/08/08. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Schwartzberg DG, Nakane PK. ACTH-related peptide containing neurons within the medulla oblongata of the rat. Brain research. 1983;276(2):351–6. Epub 1983/10/16. 0006-8993(83)90746-1 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Palkovits M, Mezey E, Eskay RL. Pro-opiomelanocortin-derived peptides (ACTH/beta-endorphin/alpha-MSH) in brainstem baroreceptor areas of the rat. Brain research. 1987;436(2):323–38. Epub 1987/12/15. 0006-8993(87)91676-3 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bronstein DM, Schafer MK, Watson SJ, Akil H. Evidence that beta-endorphin is synthesized in cells in the nucleus tractus solitarius: detection of POMC mRNA. Brain research. 1992;587(2):269–75. Epub 1992/08/07. 0006-8993(92)91007-2 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Aponte Y, Atasoy D, Sternson SM. AGRP neurons are sufficient to orchestrate feeding behavior rapidly and without training. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14(3):351–5. Epub 2011/01/07. nn.2739 [pii] 10.1038/nn.2739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Marsh DJ, Hollopeter G, Huszar D, Laufer R, Yagaloff KA, Fisher SL, et al. Response of melanocortin-4 receptor-deficient mice to anorectic and orexigenic peptides. Nature genetics. 1999;21(1):119–22. 10.1038/5070 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cone RD. Anatomy and regulation of the central melanocortin system. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(5):571–8. Epub 2005/04/28. nn1455 [pii] 10.1038/nn1455 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhan C, Zhou J, Feng Q, Zhang JE, Lin S, Bao J, et al. Acute and long-term suppression of feeding behavior by POMC neurons in the brainstem and hypothalamus, respectively. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2013;33(8):3624–32. Epub 2013/02/22. 33/8/3624 [pii] 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2742-12.2013 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ren K, Randich A, Gebhart GF. Vagal afferent modulation of a nociceptive reflex in rats: involvement of spinal opioid and monoamine receptors. Brain research. 1988;446(2):285–94. Epub 1988/04/19. 0006-8993(88)90887-6 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kirchner A, Stefan H, Bastian K, Birklein F. Vagus nerve stimulation suppresses pain but has limited effects on neurogenic inflammation in humans. European journal of pain. 2006;10(5):449–55. Epub 2005/08/30. S1090-3801(05)00081-9 [pii] 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Boscan P, Pickering AE, Paton JF. The nucleus of the solitary tract: an integrating station for nociceptive and cardiorespiratory afferents. Exp Physiol. 2002;87(2):259–66. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Barraco IRA, editor. Nucleus of the solitary tract. Boca Raton: CRC press; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhang F, Wang LP, Boyden ES, Deisseroth K. Channelrhodopsin-2 and optical control of excitable cells. Nature methods. 2006;3(10):785–92. Epub 2006/09/23. nmeth936 [pii] 10.1038/nmeth936 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Balthasar N, Coppari R, McMinn J, Liu SM, Lee CE, Tang V, et al. Leptin receptor signaling in POMC neurons is required for normal body weight homeostasis. Neuron. 2004;42(6):983–91. Epub 2004/06/23. 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.06.004 S089662730400354X [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Howorth PW, Teschemacher AG, Pickering AE. Retrograde adenoviral vector targeting of nociresponsive pontospinal noradrenergic neurons in the rat in vivo. J Comp Neurol. 2009;512(2):141–57. Epub 2008/11/13. 10.1002/cne.21879 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hickey L, Li Y, Fyson SJ, Watson TC, Perrins R, Hewinson J, et al. Optoactivation of locus ceruleus neurons evokes bidirectional changes in thermal nociception in rats. J Neurosci. 2014;34(12):4148–60. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4835-13.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Opland D, Sutton A, Woodworth H, Brown J, Bugescu R, Garcia A, et al. Loss of neurotensin receptor-1 disrupts the control of the mesolimbic dopamine system by leptin and promotes hedonic feeding and obesity. Molecular metabolism. 2013;2(4):423–34. 10.1016/j.molmet.2013.07.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sutton AK, Pei H, Burnett KH, Myers MG Jr., Rhodes CJ, Olson DP. Control of food intake and energy expenditure by Nos1 neurons of the paraventricular hypothalamus. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2014;34(46):15306–18. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0226-14.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Paton JF. A working heart-brainstem preparation of the mouse. J Neurosci Methods. 1996;65(1):63–8. Epub 1996/03/01. 0165027095001476 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature methods. 2012;9(7):676–82. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cardin JA, Carlen M, Meletis K, Knoblich U, Zhang F, Deisseroth K, et al. Targeted optogenetic stimulation and recording of neurons in vivo using cell-type-specific expression of Channelrhodopsin-2. Nat Protoc. 2010;5(2):247–54. Epub 2010/02/06. nprot.2009.228 [pii] 10.1038/nprot.2009.228 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Meister B, Gomuc B, Suarez E, Ishii Y, Durr K, Gillberg L. Hypothalamic proopiomelanocortin (POMC) neurons have a cholinergic phenotype. The European journal of neuroscience. 2006;24(10):2731–40. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05157.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mountjoy KG. Distribution and function of melanocortin receptors within the brain. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;681:29–48. Epub 2011/01/12. 10.1007/978-1-4419-6354-3_3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wan S, Browning KN, Coleman FH, Sutton G, Zheng H, Butler A, et al. Presynaptic melanocortin-4 receptors on vagal afferent fibers modulate the excitability of rat nucleus tractus solitarius neurons. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2008;28(19):4957–66. Epub 2008/05/09. 28/19/4957 [pii] 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5398-07.2008 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Richardson J, Cruz MT, Majumdar U, Lewin A, Kingsbury KA, Dezfuli G, et al. Melanocortin signaling in the brainstem influences vagal outflow to the stomach. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2013;33(33):13286–99. Epub 2013/08/16. 33/33/13286 [pii] 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0780-13.2013 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bieger D, Hopkins DA. Viscerotopic representation of the upper alimentary tract in the medulla oblongata in the rat: the nucleus ambiguus. J Comp Neurol. 1987;262(4):546–62. Epub 1987/08/22. 10.1002/cne.902620408 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Izzo PN, Deuchars J, Spyer KM. Localization of cardiac vagal preganglionic motoneurones in the rat: immunocytochemical evidence of synaptic inputs containing 5-hydroxytryptamine. J Comp Neurol. 1993;327(4):572–83. Epub 1993/01/22. 10.1002/cne.903270408 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fang FG, Haws CM, Drasner K, Williamson A, Fields HL. Opioid peptides (DAGO-enkephalin, dynorphin A(1–13), BAM 22P) microinjected into the rat brainstem: comparison of their antinociceptive effect and their effect on neuronal firing in the rostral ventromedial medulla. Brain research. 1989;501(1):116–28. Epub 1989/10/30. 0006-8993(89)91033-0 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Levine JD, Murphy DT, Seidenwurm D, Cortez A, Fields HL. A study of the quantal (all-or-none) change in reflex latency produced by opiate analgesics. Brain research. 1980;201(1):129–41. Epub 1980/11/10. 0006-8993(80)90780-5 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mogil JS, Grisel JE, Hayward MD, Bales JR, Rubinstein M, Belknap JK, et al. Disparate spinal and supraspinal opioid antinociceptive responses in beta-endorphin-deficient mutant mice. Neuroscience. 2000;101(3):709–17. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Suh HH, Tseng LF. Delta but not mu-opioid receptors in the spinal cord are involved in antinociception induced by beta-endorphin given intracerebroventricularly in mice. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 1990;253(3):981–6. Epub 1990/06/01. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Tseng LF, Collins KA. The tail-flick inhibition induced by beta-endorphin administered intrathecally is mediated by activation of kappa- and mu-opioid receptors in the mouse. Eur J Pharmacol. 1992;214(1):59–65. Epub 1992/04/07. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Morgan MM, Sohn JH, Lohof AM, Ben-Eliyahu S, Liebeskind JC. Characterization of stimulation-produced analgesia from the nucleus tractus solitarius in the rat. Brain research. 1989;486(1):175–80. Epub 1989/05/01. 0006-8993(89)91291-2 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Randich A, Roose MG, Gebhart GF. Characterization of antinociception produced by glutamate microinjection in the nucleus tractus solitarius and the nucleus reticularis ventralis. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 1988;8(12):4675–84. Epub 1988/12/01. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wang D, He X, Zhao Z, Feng Q, Lin R, Sun Y, et al. Whole-brain mapping of the direct inputs and axonal projections of POMC and AgRP neurons. Frontiers in neuroanatomy. 2015;9:40 10.3389/fnana.2015.00040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Appleyard SM, Bailey TW, Doyle MW, Jin YH, Smart JL, Low MJ, et al. Proopiomelanocortin neurons in nucleus tractus solitarius are activated by visceral afferents: regulation by cholecystokinin and opioids. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2005;25(14):3578–85. Epub 2005/04/09. 25/14/3578 [pii] 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4177-04.2005 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Dutschmann M, Waki H, Manzke T, Simms AE, Pickering AE, Richter DW, et al. The potency of different serotonergic agonists in counteracting opioid evoked cardiorespiratory disturbances. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009;364(1529):2611–23. 10.1098/rstb.2009.0076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Holaday JW. Cardiovascular effects of endogenous opiate systems. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1983;23:541–94. Epub 1983/01/01. 10.1146/annurev.pa.23.040183.002545 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pattinson KT. Opioids and the control of respiration. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100(6):747–58. Epub 2008/05/06. aen094 [pii] 10.1093/bja/aen094 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Aicher SA, Randich A. Antinociception and cardiovascular responses produced by electrical stimulation in the nucleus tractus solitarius, nucleus reticularis ventralis, and the caudal medulla. Pain. 1990;42(1):103–19. Epub 1990/07/01. 0304-3959(90)91096-2 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Randich A, Gebhart GF. Vagal afferent modulation of nociception. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1992;17(2):77–99. Epub 1992/05/01. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bohotin C, Scholsem M, Multon S, Martin D, Bohotin V, Schoenen J. Vagus nerve stimulation in awake rats reduces formalin-induced nociceptive behaviour and fos-immunoreactivity in trigeminal nucleus caudalis. Pain. 2003;101(1–2):3–12. Epub 2003/01/01. S0304395902003019 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kirchner A, Birklein F, Stefan H, Handwerker HO. Left vagus nerve stimulation suppresses experimentally induced pain. Neurology. 2000;55(8):1167–71. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Busch V, Zeman F, Heckel A, Menne F, Ellrich J, Eichhammer P. The effect of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on pain perception—an experimental study. Brain stimulation. 2013;6(2):202–9. Epub 2012/05/25. S1935-861X(12)00070-8 [pii] 10.1016/j.brs.2012.04.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bandler R, Shipley MT. Columnar organization in the midbrain periaqueductal gray: modules for emotional expression? Trends Neurosci. 1994;17(9):379–89. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Irnaten M, Aicher SA, Wang J, Venkatesan P, Evans C, Baxi S, et al. Mu-opioid receptors are located postsynaptically and endomorphin-1 inhibits voltage-gated calcium currents in premotor cardiac parasympathetic neurons in the rat nucleus ambiguus. Neuroscience. 2003;116(2):573–82. Epub 2003/02/01. S0306452202006577 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Vaughan CW, Ingram SL, Connor MA, Christie MJ. How opioids inhibit GABA-mediated neurotransmission. Nature. 1997;390(6660):611–4. 10.1038/37610 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Frank JG, Jameson HS, Gorini C, Mendelowitz D. Mapping and identification of GABAergic neurons in transgenic mice projecting to cardiac vagal neurons in the nucleus ambiguus using photo-uncaging. Journal of neurophysiology. 2009;101(4):1755–60. Epub 2009/01/24. 91134.2008 [pii] 10.1152/jn.91134.2008 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Griffioen KJ, Venkatesan P, Huang ZG, Wang X, Bouairi E, Evans C, et al. Fentanyl inhibits GABAergic neurotransmission to cardiac vagal neurons in the nucleus ambiguus. Brain research. 2004;1007(1–2):109–15. Epub 2004/04/06. 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.02.010 S0006899304002550 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Venkatesan P, Baxi S, Evans C, Neff R, Wang X, Mendelowitz D. Glycinergic inputs to cardiac vagal neurons in the nucleus ambiguus are inhibited by nociceptin and mu-selective opioids. Journal of neurophysiology. 2003;90(3):1581–8. Epub 2003/05/23. 10.1152/jn.01117.2002 01117.2002 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Yang Y, Atasoy D, Su HH, Sternson SM. Hunger states switch a flip-flop memory circuit via a synaptic AMPK-dependent positive feedback loop. Cell. 2011;146(6):992–1003. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Lalley PM. Opioidergic and dopaminergic modulation of respiration. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2008;164(1–2):160–7. Epub 2008/04/09. S1569-9048(08)00044-X [pii] 10.1016/j.resp.2008.02.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Lalley PM, Pilowsky PM, Forster HV, Zuperku EJ. CrossTalk opposing view: The pre-Botzinger complex is not essential for respiratory depression following systemic administration of opioid analgesics. The Journal of physiology. 2014;592(Pt 6):1163–6. 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.258830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Montandon G, Horner R. CrossTalk proposal: The preBotzinger complex is essential for the respiratory depression following systemic administration of opioid analgesics. The Journal of physiology. 2014;592(Pt 6):1159–62. 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.261974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Montandon G, Qin W, Liu H, Ren J, Greer JJ, Horner RL. PreBotzinger complex neurokinin-1 receptor-expressing neurons mediate opioid-induced respiratory depression. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2011;31(4):1292–301. Epub 2011/01/29. 31/4/1292 [pii] 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4611-10.2011 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Prkic I, Mustapic S, Radocaj T, Stucke AG, Stuth EA, Hopp FA, et al. Pontine mu-opioid receptors mediate bradypnea caused by intravenous remifentanil infusions at clinically relevant concentrations in dogs. Journal of neurophysiology. 2012;108(9):2430–41. 10.1152/jn.00185.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Farmer D, Dutschmann M, Pickering A, Paton J, McAllen R. Distinct brainstem origins of cardiac vagal tone and respiratory sinus arrhythmia. The FASEB Journal. 2015;29(1 Supplement):1056.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Harrison D, Beggs S, Stevens B. Sucrose for procedural pain management in infants. Pediatrics. 2012;130(5):918–25. 10.1542/peds.2011-3848 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Mason P, Foo H. Food consumption inhibits pain-related behaviors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2009;1170:399–402. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04368.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Dum J, Herz A. Endorphinergic modulation of neural reward systems indicated by behavioral changes. Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior. 1984;21(2):259–66. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Anseloni VC, Ren K, Dubner R, Ennis M. A brainstem substrate for analgesia elicited by intraoral sucrose. Neuroscience. 2005;133(1):231–43. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.01.055 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data files are available from the University of Bristol research data repository "data.bris" at data.bris.ac.uk.