Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the need for permanent pacing in patients who have survived the effects of anterior myocardial infarction with complete heart block and have returned to sinus rhythm but who are left with impairment of intraventricular conduction. We have reviewed 52 patients with complete heart block complicating recent anterior myocardial infarction. Temporary pacing was instituted in all patients. There were 25 hospital survivors who were followed for an average of 49 months. Long-term pacing was established in 4 patients. Of the 21 patients in sinus rhythm, 14 had partial bilateral bundle-branch block with either right bundle-branch block and left anterior hemiblock or right bundle-branch block and left posterior hemiblock; at the end of the follow-up period, 10 of these 14 were alive and well. Furthermore, permanent pacing failed to prevent sudden death in 2 patients. At the present time, therefore, we conclude that long-term pacing is not justified in patients, otherwise asymptomatic, with partial bilateral bundle-branch block persisting after transient complete heart block in anterior myocardial infarction.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Atkins J. M., Leshin S. J., Blomqvist G., Mullins C. B. Ventricular conduction blocks and sudden death in acute myocardial infarction. Potential indications for pacing. N Engl J Med. 1973 Feb 8;288(6):281–284. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197302082880603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chatterjee K., Harris A., Leatham A. The risk of pacing after infarction, and current recommendations. Lancet. 1969 Nov 15;2(7629):1061–1063. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(69)90658-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Denes P., Dhingra R. C., Wu D., Chuquimia R., Amat-Y-Leon F., Wyndham C., Rosen K. M. H-V interval in patients with bifascicular block (right bundle branch block and left anterior hemiblock). Clinical, electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic correlations. Am J Cardiol. 1975 Jan;35(1):23–29. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(75)90554-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Norris R. M., Mercer C. J., Croxson M. S. Conduction disturbances due to anteroseptal myocardial infarction and their treatment by endocardial pacing. Am Heart J. 1972 Oct;84(4):560–566. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(72)90480-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosenbaum M. B. The hemiblocks: diagnostic criteria and clinical significance. Mod Concepts Cardiovasc Dis. 1970 Dec;39(12):141–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scherlag B. J., Lau S. H., Helfant R. H., Berkowitz W. D., Stein E., Damato A. N. Catheter technique for recording His bundle activity in man. Circulation. 1969 Jan;39(1):13–18. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.39.1.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Watanabe Y., Pamintuan J. C., Dreifus L. S. Role of intraventricular conduction disturbances in ventricular premature systoles. Am J Cardiol. 1973 Aug;32(2):188–195. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(73)80119-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]