Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2015 Dec 23;99(4):749–766. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13267

Characterisation of Shigella Spa33 and Thermotoga FliM/N reveals a new model for C‐ring assembly in T3SS

Melanie A McDowell 4,1, Julien Marcoux 5,2, Gareth McVicker 4, Steven Johnson 4, Yu Hang Fong 4, Rebecca Stevens 4, Lesley A H Bowman 4, Matteo T Degiacomi 5, Jun Yan 5, Adam Wise 4, Miriam E Friede 4, Justin L P Benesch 5, Janet E Deane 4,3, Christoph M Tang 4, Carol V Robinson 5, Susan M Lea 4,
PMCID: PMC4832279  PMID: 26538516

Summary

Flagellar type III secretion systems (T3SS) contain an essential cytoplasmic‐ring (C‐ring) largely composed of two proteins FliM and FliN, whereas an analogous substructure for the closely related non‐flagellar (NF) T3SS has not been observed in situ. We show that the spa33 gene encoding the putative NF‐T3SS C‐ring component in S higella flexneri is alternatively translated to produce both full‐length (Spa33‐FL) and a short variant (Spa33‐C), with both required for secretion. They associate in a 1:2 complex (Spa33‐FL/C2) that further oligomerises into elongated arrays in vitro. The structure of Spa33‐C 2 and identification of an unexpected intramolecular pseudodimer in Spa33‐FL reveal a molecular model for their higher order assembly within NF‐T3SS. Spa33‐FL and Spa33‐C are identified as functional counterparts of a FliM–FliN fusion and free FliN respectively. Furthermore, we show that T hermotoga maritima  FliM and FliN form a 1:3 complex structurally equivalent to Spa33‐FL/C2, allowing us to propose a unified model for C‐ring assembly by NF‐T3SS and flagellar‐T3SS.

Introduction

Non‐flagellar type III secretion systems (NF‐T3SS) are essential for initiating infection by many pathogenic Gram‐negative bacteria (Cornelis, 2006). These include several enteropathogenic species such as Salmonella, Escherichia, Yersinia and, the primary focus of this study, Shigella, which invades a variety of cells in the intestinal tract and causes over one million deaths annually from bacterial dysentery or shigellosis (Kotloff et al., 1999). This large protein export apparatus (Fig. S1) is composed of ∼ 25 different proteins with both species specific and unified Sct names and functions as a molecular syringe, injecting virulence factors from the bacterial cytoplasm directly into the host‐cell (Marlovits and Stebbins, 2010; Abrusci et al., 2014). Secretion by NF‐T3SS occurs by a defined hierarchy, with a secretion‐competent complex (comprising a dual membrane‐spanning basal body, cytoplasmic components and an export apparatus) enabling sequential assembly of a hollow extracellular needle, insertion of a contiguous pore into the eukaryotic cell membrane and transport of effectors through this conduit (Diepold and Wagner, 2014).

Early visualisations of Shigella flexneri membrane ghosts revealed the NF‐T3SS to have a prominent cytoplasmic bulb at the base of the basal body, likely composed of the soluble components that control and regulate secretion (Blocker et al., 1999). In particular, the protein Spa33 (SctQ), which is essential for secretion and localises to the base of the S. flexneri NF‐T3SS in situ via association with the basal body (Morita‐Ishihara et al., 2006; Barison et al., 2012), has been proposed to form a substructure termed the cytoplasmic‐ring (C‐ring) (Morita‐Ishihara et al., 2006). The Salmonella pathogenicity island (SPI)‐1 orthologue SpaO has the propensity to form large molecular weight complexes that interact with NF‐T3SS chaperone‐substrate complexes with differential affinities, leading to the suggestion that this C‐ring may act as a ‘sorting platform’ to establish the correct secretion hierarchy (Lara‐Tejero et al., 2011). In addition, interactions between SctQ and the other essential cytoplasmic components SctN, SctL and SctK (Fig. S1) were identified in various species (Jackson and Plano, 2000; Johnson and Blocker, 2008; Johnson et al., 2008; Biemans‐Oldehinkel et al., 2011; Lara‐Tejero et al., 2011) and shown to be required for their colocalisation at the base of the Yersinia NF‐T3SS (Diepold et al., 2010), indicating the C‐ring likely forms part of a significant cytoplasmic structure.

In the first cryoelectron tomography structures of the NF‐T3SS from Shigella, Yersinia and Salmonella, a C‐ring was notably absent, despite clear density for the SctN ATPase in the cytoplasm (Kawamoto et al., 2013; Kudryashev et al., 2013). However, in a more recent in situ structure of the NF‐T3SS from S. flexneri minicells, a more extensive cytoplasmic substructure was observed, whereby six SctL spokes radiate from the central SctN hub and connect to the C‐ring component (Hu et al., 2015). Although Hu et al. (2015) observe only discrete pods of density for Spa33 instead of a ‘C‐ring’, in vivo fluorescent measurements subsequently showed ∼ 22 copies of the Yersinia orthologue are present at the base of the NF‐T3SS and undergoing rapid exchange with a cytosolic pool (Diepold et al., 2015), indicating a more extensive yet unstable C‐ring substructure may still exist.

The NF‐T3SS shares a similar overall architecture and many individual components with the bacterial flagellum, which uses a T3SS to assemble an extracellular hook and filament (Büttner, 2012). In particular, the flagellar‐T3SS has a C‐ring that is comparatively better characterised, with a cryoelectron microscopy (EM) reconstruction of the entire substructure showing ∼ 34‐fold symmetry (Thomas et al., 2006). The C‐terminus of Spa33 shows weak sequence homology to the SpoA domains of FliM and FliN that form the flagellar C‐ring along with FliG. Recently, it has been shown for the orthologues Yersinia YscQ and Salmonella SPI‐2 SsaQ that an alternative translation initiation site exists within the gene, leading to the production of both the full‐length protein and a C‐terminal fragment (Yu et al., 2011; Bzymek et al., 2012). Together with the structural similarity between the homodimers formed by the YscQ C‐terminal variant (YscQ‐C) and FliN SpoA domains (Brown et al., 2005; Bzymek et al., 2012), it has been suggested that the full‐length and C‐terminal proteins are likely to be equivalent to FliM and FliN respectively and are therefore both integral components of the putative NF C‐ring as in the flagellar C‐ring. Indeed, both YscQ and YscQ‐C are required for assembly and function of the Yersinia NF‐T3SS (Bzymek et al., 2012; Diepold et al., 2015), although a chaperone role for the shorter variant has also been proposed (Yu et al., 2011).

Although initially identified as part of the rotational switch complex, the flagellar C‐ring is also essential for protein secretion (Vogler et al., 1991) and is involved in interactions with the SctL homologue FliH (Paul and Blair, 2006; Minamino et al., 2009) and indirectly with the flagellar basal body (Thomas et al., 2006), suggesting similarities to the role of the C‐ring within the NF‐T3SS. However, the contiguous C‐ring robustly associated with the flagellar‐T3SS (Thomas et al., 2006) is clearly different from the recently observed pod‐like structures formed by Spa33 at the base of the Shigella NF‐T3SS (Hu et al., 2015). Furthermore, full‐length YscQ has been shown to interact with dimeric YscQ‐C to form a 1:2 complex (Bzymek et al., 2012), which is at odds with the proposed 1:4 stoichiometry for FliM and FliN (Brown et al., 2005). Together with the additional role of the flagellar C‐ring in torque generation and direction switching during flagellum rotation, it is possible that the C‐ring proteins of the NF‐T3SS could adopt a different arrangement to fulfil different functional requirements. Also, S. flexneri spa33 has neither a start codon nor an unambiguous ribosome binding site (RBS) in the vicinity of the alternative translation initiation site found in orthologous genes, leading to suggestions that this mechanism for producing a FliN‐like C‐terminal variant may not be conserved across all NF‐T3SS (Bzymek et al., 2012). Therefore, many aspects of the structure and function of the S. flexneri C‐ring could not be assumed or predicted based on our current knowledge of orthologues from NF‐ and flagellar‐T3SS, requiring further characterisation to determine the extent to which C‐ring structure has diversified between systems.

In this study, we show that alternative translation occurs to generate full‐length Spa33 (Spa33‐FL) and a shorter C‐terminal fragment (Spa33‐C) within S. flexneri, with the production of both being required for assembly and function of the NF‐T3SS. High resolution biophysical studies demonstrate that Spa33‐FL and Spa33‐C associate to form a minimal 1:2 complex that then undergoes further oligomerisation to produce elongated arrays. We also identify an additional SpoA domain in the SctQ sequences, allowing us to propose a new molecular model for C‐ring assembly. Using native mass spectrometry (MS), we reanalyse the assembly of the canonical flagellar C‐ring of Thermotoga maritima and demonstrate that its sub‐complexes are built from a 1:3 ratio of FliM/FliN that is consistent with our Spa33‐FL/C2 model, thereby supporting a single, unified model for assembly of the NF and flagellar C‐ring.

Results

Spa33‐FL and Spa33‐C are alternative translation products of the same gene and are both required to form a functional NF‐T3SS

Spa33 with an N‐terminal His‐tag was expressed recombinantly in Escherichia coli, allowing purification via Ni‐affinity and size exclusion chromatography (SEC). Two proteins were observed to co‐purify throughout (Fig. 1A), with masses of 35.6 kDa and 11.6 kDa defined by MS. Western blotting of the purified complex with anti‐Spa33 polyclonal antibodies raised against residues 208–293 of the protein (α‐Spa33) showed both species to contain this C‐terminal region of Spa33 (Fig. 1A). The larger species was therefore able to be assigned as tagged full‐length Spa33 (Spa33‐FL), whereas the size of the smaller species was consistent with residues 192–293 at the extreme C‐terminus of Spa33, hereafter referred to as Spa33‐C. In addition, both Spa33‐FL and Spa33‐C were detected by α‐Spa33 within wild‐type S. flexneri (WT; Table 1), indicating Spa33‐C is a physiologically relevant species (Fig. 1C).

Figure 1.

figure

Spa33‐C is an alternative expression product of S . flexneri spa33 and forms a complex with Spa33‐FL that is required for T3SS function in vivo.

A. Equivalent sections from a Coomassie stained gel and α‐Spa33 Western blot showing bands for the purified complex of Spa33‐FL and Spa33‐C. Samples were separated on a 15% SDS‐PA gel and α‐Spa33 was used at 1:50 000 dilution in blocking buffer.

B. Nucleotide and protein sequences for selected regions of the spa33 gene from WT S . flexneri. The RBS (blue) and start codon (red) at the predicted alternative translation initiation site for Spa33‐C are shown within the nucleotide sequence. The mutations in the spa33 sequences of spa33Δ C and spa33Δ FL strains and their affect on the amino acid sequence are shown relative to the WT sequence.

C. α‐Spa33 Western blot of whole cell lysate taken from WT, spa33Δ FL, spa33Δ C, spa33Δ FL C and Δspa33 strains of S . flexneri showing in vivo levels of Spa33‐FL and Spa33‐C. Samples were separated on a 15% SDS‐PA gel and α‐Spa33 was used at 1:1000 dilution in blocking buffer.

D. CR induction assay for WT, spa33Δ FL, spa33Δ C, spa33Δ FL C and Δspa33 strains of S . flexneri. Cell cultures were supplemented with 0.2 mg ml−1 CR, and samples taken from the supernatant were separated on a 10% SDS‐PA gel and silver‐stained. The position of early effectors within the characteristic gel profile is shown.

Table 1.

S . flexneri strains used in this study

Strain Description Source
WT Wild‐type M90T, serotype 5a Sansonetti et al. (1982)
spa33::sacB‐kanR GMCT113, Kanr This study
spa33ΔFL GMCT129 (allelic exchange of GMCT113 with pGM133) This study
spa33ΔC GMCT131 (allelic exchange of GMCT113 with pGM134) This study
spa33ΔFL/C GMCT133 (allelic exchange of GMCT113 with pGM136) This study
Δspa33 GMCT135 (allelic exchange of GMCT113 with pGM135) This study

We reasoned that Spa33‐C could either be an alternative product of the spa33 gene or produced by post‐translational cleavage of Spa33‐FL. The experimentally determined mass of Spa33‐C (11630 ± 9 Da; data not shown) indicated this species would be expected to have a formylmethionine residue at the N‐terminus (11634 Da) rather than the valine residue encoded by the GTG codon at this position (11574 Da). Further inspection of the spa33 gene sequence revealed a purine‐rich putative RBS in the expected position upstream of the first codon of Spa33‐C (Fig. 1B, Fig. S2), suggesting Spa33‐C is produced from a distinct translation start site to Spa33‐FL. To test this hypothesis, allelic exchange was used to introduce silent mutations in both the putative RBS and alternative start codon (Fig. 1B) within the spa33 gene of S. flexneri, generating strain spa33ΔC (Table 1). A greatly diminished level of Spa33‐C was detected by α‐Spa33 within spa33ΔC relative to the WT, whereas the level of Spa33‐FL remained the same (Fig. 1C). Conversely, a spa33ΔFL strain (Table 1), which has tandem stop codons inserted after the first three codons of the spa33 gene (Fig. 1B), was able to produce Spa33‐C in the absence of Spa33‐FL (Fig. 1C). Together these data show that Spa33‐C is translated independently of Spa33‐FL via the identified alternative initiation site within the spa33 gene.

The basal functionality of the S. flexneri T3SS can be assessed via addition of Congo red (CR) to the growth medium, which mimics host‐cell contact and induces secretion of early effectors by the WT strain (Fig. 1D) (Bahrani et al., 1997). Neither the spa33ΔC nor the spa33ΔFL strain displayed secretion upon CR induction (Fig. 1D), phenotypically mimicking a Δspa33 strain (Table 1) and indicating that production of both Spa33‐FL and Spa33‐C are required for assembly of a functional T3SS.

Structural characterisation of Spa33‐C

The C‐terminal 86 residues of Spa33 (Spa33208‐293) were expressed with a C‐terminal His‐tag in E. coli, purified to homogeneity and the tag removed for successful crystallisation trials. The 2.3 Å resolution crystal structure of Spa33208‐293 was subsequently determined by molecular replacement (Table 2). The structure shows a SpoA domain that forms the expected saddle‐shaped homodimer with an approximate twofold rotational symmetry axis (Fig. 2A). Regions of notable asymmetry (Fig. 2C) have high B‐factors (Fig. 2D), suggesting conformational flexibility accounts for major differences between the dimer halves. Each copy of Spa33208‐293 is highly intertwined within the dimer, with the fold being highly homologous to that observed in the crystal structures of orthologous proteins. Indeed superimposition of Spa33208‐293 with T. maritima FliN (Brown et al., 2005) (2.18 Å RMSD, 126 Cα atoms)(Fig. 2A), Yersinia pseudotuberculosis YscQ‐C (Bzymek et al., 2012) (2.09 Å RMSD, 135 Cα atoms) (Fig. 2E) and Pseudomonas syringae HrcQB‐C (Fadouloglou et al., 2004) (2.40 Å RMSD, 133 Cα atoms) (Fig. 2F) shows a remarkably similar arrangement of secondary structure elements.

Table 2.

Data collection and refinement statistics

Data collection
λ (Å) 0.9795
Space group P21
Unit cell dimensions (Å, °) 51.3, 27.8, 104.4, 90, 90.03, 90
Resolution (Å)a 51.3–2.3 (2.38–2.30)
Number of unique reflections 13523 (1286)
Multiplicitya 3.6 (3.6)
Completeness (%)a 99.5 (99.1)
Rmerge a 0.042 (0.77)
Rpim a 0.029 (0.55)
CC1/2 0.999 (0.660)
Average I/σ(I)a 21.3 (2.1)
Refinement
Rwork/Rfree 17.4/21.0 (32.4/36.5)
RMSDs
Bond lengths (Å) 0.007
Bond angles (°) 1.03
No. of atoms
Protein 2273
Ligand 16
Water 65
Ramachandranb
Favoured (%) 93.4
Allowed (%) 100
Disallowed (%) 0
Average B‐factor 56.9
Molprobity score 2.65
a

Values in brackets are for the highest resolution shell.

b

Determined using MolProbity (Davis et al., 2007).

Figure 2.

figure

Spa33‐C forms a highly intertwined homodimer with unstructured N‐terminal extensions.

A. The crystal structure of Spa33208‐293 shown as a cartoon representation. Chain A and B are coloured teal and purple respectively. The Spa33208‐293 dimer is superimposed with the T . maritima  FliN structure (pdb id 1YAB), shown in grey.

B. Overlay of 1 H,15 N‐HSQC spectra for 100 μM Spa33‐C (black) and Spa33‐CΔN (red) collected under the same buffer conditions.

C. Superimposition of chain A (teal) and chain B (purple) of the Spa33208‐293 dimer (1.70 Å RMSD, 64 C α atoms).

D. The structure of Spa33208‐293 coloured according to the C α B‐factor (Å2). Superimposition of the Spa33208‐293 dimer (grey) with the structures of E Y . pseudotuberculosis  YscQ‐C (turquoise; pdb id 3UEP) and F P . syringae  HrcQB‐C (green; pdb id 1O9Y).

The structure of Spa33208‐293 may provide a good model for the physiologically relevant species Spa33‐C, which has only an additional 28 residues at the N‐terminus not visible in the crystal structure. To test this, full‐length Spa33‐C and a truncated construct comprising only those residues visible in the crystal structure (Spa33‐CΔN) were purified as 15N‐labelled proteins for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. An overlay of the 1H,15N‐HSQC spectra obtained for each protein shows a high number of coincident peaks (Fig. 2B), which have a good chemical shift dispersion in both dimensions and provide further evidence that this shared region likely has the highly structured fold determined by X‐ray crystallography. In contrast, the additional peaks present for Spa33‐C that correspond to residues within the uncharacterised N‐terminal extension are collapsed into the central region of the spectrum (Fig. 2B). This suggests that the N‐terminal 28 residues of Spa33‐C are flexible and unstructured, further evidenced by their absence in the crystal structures of Spa33208‐293 and other orthologous proteins (Fadouloglou et al., 2004; Brown et al., 2005; Bzymek et al., 2012).

Spa33‐FL and Spa33‐C associate to form a 1:2 complex that undergoes further oligomerisation in vitro

To ascertain the stoichiometry and nature of the interaction between Spa33‐FL and Spa33‐C, the purified complex was subjected to native MS. All detectable Spa33‐FL was found to be associated with Spa33‐C, with its smallest complex being accounted for by one copy of Spa33‐FL and two copies of Spa33‐C (Spa33‐FL/C2) (Fig. 3A). As further verification, SEC‐MALS was carried out with various concentrations of the purified complex, showing the smallest observed species to have a molar mass consistent with Spa33‐FL/C2 (Fig. 3B). Therefore, a 1:2 complex is probably the minimal unit formed by Spa33‐FL and Spa33‐C, in agreement with findings for the Yersinia C‐ring proteins (Bzymek et al., 2012).

Figure 3.

figure

Spa33‐FL and Spa33‐C interact to form a 1:2 complex that undergoes further oligomerisation into elongated arrays in vitro.

A. Mass spectrum of His‐Spa33‐FL/Spa33‐C complexes obtained under non‐denaturing conditions showing the presence of Spa33‐C 2 (dark green) and Spa33‐FL/C 2 (dark blue) building blocks. The other species correspond to even assemblies of the Spa33‐FL/C 2 subcomplex, with dimers (yellow), tetramers (orange) and hexamers (red) distinguishable. For each assigned complex, the charge state of the most intense peak is shown and a comparison of experimental and theoretical molecular mass is given in Table 3.

B. Analysis of the oligomeric state of His‐Spa33‐FL/Spa33‐C complexes by SEC and in‐line MALS. The left axis represents the molecular mass at any given point of the chromatogram. Elution profiles are shown for the main elution peak for the dilution series (from left to right) 60 μM, 30 μM, 15 μM, 7.5 μM and 3.7 μM Spa33‐FL/C 2 and the expected molar mass for Spa33‐FL/C 2 is marked.

C. Comparison of experimental CCS (black) measured for each complex visible in the native mass spectrum in A with theoretical values for spherical (blue) and linear (red) assemblies of Spa33‐FL/C 2. To obtain theoretical CCS values for spherical aggregates of Spa33‐FL/C2, the diameter of a sphere having the same CCS as the experimental monomer was determined and then used to calculate the CCS of spheres with 2–8 times bigger volume. In order to obtain theoretical CCS values for linear assemblies of Spa33‐FL/C 2, CSS was directly calculated from the spiral arrangement of SpoA dimers observed in the Spa33208‐293 crystal lattice (red cartoon representation equivalent to the molecular model in Fig. 5D) and incremented to account for the missing mass of the Spa33‐FL N‐terminal domain (red sphere).

Both the native mass spectrum (Fig. 3A) and SEC‐MALS trace (Fig. 3B) for purified Spa33‐FL/C2 clearly show that this complex is able to oligomerise further, with high molecular weight species comprising up to six copies of Spa33‐FL/C2 able to be unambiguously assigned in the native mass spectrum (Fig. 3A). In order to probe the shape of these large oligomers of Spa33‐FL/C2, native MS was coupled with ion mobility (IM‐MS), allowing species to be separated on the basis of their collisional cross‐section (CCS). The experimentally determined CCS values for oligomers of Spa33‐FL/C2 were seen to deviate from theoretical CCS values for spherical aggregates of the complex (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, SEC‐MALS suggested that concentration‐dependent Spa33‐FL/C2 oligomerisation was highly dynamic and reversible (Fig. 3B), suggesting that Spa33‐FL/C2 is unlikely to be undergoing uncontrolled aggregation in solution. Therefore, the data suggest that Spa33‐FL/C2 acts as a building block in the formation of large, ordered oligomers, as would be required to form a structure akin to the flagellar C‐ring.

The flagellar C‐ring proteins FliM and FliN form a 1:3 complex in vitro

As S. flexneri Spa33‐FL/Spa33‐C appear to mimic characteristics of FliM/FliN respectively from the flagellar‐C‐ring, we considered whether the complexes formed by these proteins would maintain similar interactions and oligomeric states. However, our finding that the minimal unit formed by Spa33‐FL and Spa33‐C is a 1:2 complex differs from the current model for flagellar C‐ring assembly, where analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) and cross‐link based modelling suggest a 1:4 association of FliM and FliN (Brown et al., 2005). Therefore, we sought to re‐evaluate the stoichiometry of FliM/FliN complexes in vitro using native MS, as this technique is able to distinguish between different complexes within a mixture and yields much smaller experimental errors on molar mass measurements (Marcoux and Robinson, 2013).

The 1:4 model for FliM and FliN association was originally proposed based on data acquired from the T. maritima C‐ring proteins (Brown et al., 2005). Subsequently, this T. maritima ‘FliN’ construct has been characterised as the C‐terminal 132 residues of a FliY protein, an additional component of the flagellar C‐ring that replaces or acts in conjunction with a FliN‐like protein in a subset of bacteria (Sircar et al., 2013). Using native MS, we found that T. maritima FliM/FliN (Fig. S3B) and FliM/FliY (Fig. S3C) existed as a complicated mixture of complexes, largely due to the partial incorporation of a smaller species corresponding to residues 235–343 of FliY (FliN*) (Fig. S3A). Intriguingly, the experimentally determined molecular mass of FliN* (12314 ± 1 Da) (Table 3) suggested the N‐terminal residue was likely to be formylmethionine (12302 Da) instead of valine (12242 Da) and a 30 nucleotide stretch of purines lies upstream of the start site for this species. Therefore, FliN* seems likely to be a product of alternative translation initiation of the fliY gene (Fig. S2), hinting that T. maritima could also synthesise a FliN‐like protein in a similar manner to the production of Spa33‐C by S. flexneri. When only FliM/FliN* were coexpressed and purified it was found to predominantly form 1:3 complexes by native MS (Fig. 4A), which was at odds with both our observation of a 1:2 complex for Spa33‐FL/Spa33‐C and the previously characterised T. maritima FliM/FliN 1:4 complex (Brown et al., 2005).

Table 3.

Molecular masses determined by native mass spectrometry in this study

Complex Experimental molecular mass (Da) Theoretical molecular mass (Da)
Spa33‐FL/C2 spectrum a
Spa33‐C2 23180 ± 73 23212
Spa33‐FL/C2 58992 ± 89 58757
(Spa33‐FL/C2)2 117786 ± 34 117514
(Spa33‐FL/C2)4 235645 ± 78 235028
(Spa33‐FL/C2)6 353804 ± 288 352542
T. maritima FliM/FliN spectrum b
FliN* 12313 ± 1 12302
FliN 15144 ± 1 15146
FliN2 30295 ± 14 30292
FliM/FliN2/FliN* 82609 ± 13 82645
FliM/FliN3 85446 ± 4 85489
FliM2/FliN2/FliN*2 133660 ± 24 134998
FliM2/FliN3/FliN* 137724 ± 49 137842
FliM2/FliN4 140504 ± 20 140686
FliM3/FliN4/FliN*2 205128 ± 271 205341
T. maritima FliM/FliY spectrum b
FliM/FliY 77830 ± 7 78048
FliM/FliY/FliN*2 102458 ± 9 102653
FliM/FliY/FliN/FliN* 105299 ± 23 105496
FliM/FliY2/FliN* 128038 ± 14 128347
FliM/FliY2/FliN/FliN*2 154760 ± 45 155795
FliM/FliY2/FliN2/FliN* 157606 ± 26 158639
FliM2/FliY2/FliN*2 180416 ± 43 180700
FliM2/FliY2/FliN/FliN* 183256 ± 41 183544
FliM2/FliY3/FliN* 206064 ± 40 206395
T. maritima FliM/FliN* spectrum b
FliN* 12284 ± 1 and 12415 ± 1 12282 and 12413 (± N‐terminal Met)
FliM/FliN*3 77075 ± 32 76897 and 77293
FliM2/FliN*4 129488 ± 16 129230 and 129754
Spa33‐C spectrum c, d
Spa33‐C 12023 ± 1 12021
Spa33‐C2 24134 ± 3 24042
(Spa33‐C2)2 48265 ± 7 48084
(Spa33‐C2)3 72390 ± 15 72126
(Spa33‐C2)4 96552 ± 47 96168
Spa33‐FL(CTD)/Spa33‐C spectrum a
Spa33‐FL(CTD) 20467 ± 7 20449
Spa33‐FL(CTD)2 40941 ± 7 40898
Spa33‐FL(CTD)3 61669 ± 85 61347
Spa33‐C2 23005 ± 15 22984
Spa33‐FL(CTD)/C2 43465 ± 4 43433
Spa33‐FL(CTD)2/C2 63976 ± 20 63882
Spa33‐FL/C2(Y221R) spectrum a
Spa33‐FL/C2(Y221R) 59106 ± 19 58772
(Spa33‐FL/C2(Y221R))2 118780 ± 19 117544
Spa33‐FL/Cstrep2 spectrum a
Spa33‐Cstrep2 25217 ± 7 25064
Spa33‐FL/Cstrep2 60819 ± 54 60645
(Spa33‐FL/Cstrep2)2 121627 ± 69 121290
(Spa33‐FL/Cstrep2)4 243761 ± 159 242580
Spa33‐FL/Ctrx2 spectrum a
Spa33‐Ctrx2 47465 ± 6 46991
Spa33‐FL/Ctrx2 83143 ± 1 82600
(Spa33‐FL/Ctrx2)2 166123 ± 1 165200
Spa33‐FL/Cmbp2 spectrum a
Spa33‐Cmbp 51737 ± 3 51687
Spa33‐Cmbp2 103467 ± 2 103374
Spa33‐FL/Cmbp2 138988 ± 4 138955
a

Native protein sequence of Spa33‐FL or Spa33‐FL(CTD) construct has additional N‐terminal MGSSHHHHHHSSGLVPRGSH affinity tag.

b

Native protein sequence of FliM construct has additional N‐terminal MGSSHHHHHHSSGLVPRGSH affinity tag.

c

Spectrum acquired with 15N‐labelled protein; theoretical molecular mass calculated assuming 100% labelling efficiency.

d

Native protein sequence of Spa33‐C construct has additional GSH N‐terminal extension remaining after thrombin cleavage of affinity tag.

Figure 4.

figure

T. maritima  FliM and FliN* interact to form a 1:3 complex that is analogous to the 1:2 complex formed by Spa33‐FL(CTD) and Spa33‐C.

A. Mass spectrum of His‐FliM/FliN* complexes obtained under non‐denaturing conditions showing the presence of FliN* (light green), FliM/FliN*3 (dark blue) and FliM 2/FliN*4 building blocks (yellow). The peak splitting for the FliN* charge state is due to the partial loss of the N‐terminal methionine residue. For each assigned complex, the charge state of the most intense peak is shown and a comparison of experimental and theoretical molecular mass is given in Table 3.

B. Multiple sequence alignment of the SpoA2 domain of Spa33‐C and the SpoA1 domain of Spa33‐FL with orthologues from the NF‐T3SS in Y . pseudotuberculosis (YscQ) and S . typhimurium  SPI‐1 (SpaO) and with FliN/FliM from the flagellar‐T3SS in T . maritima (TM) and E . coli (EC), performed using ClustalW2 (Chenna et al., 2003) and represented using ESPript 3.0 (http://espript.ibcp.fr) (Gouet et al., 2003). Conserved similar residues are shown in yellow, with asterisks denoting those residues within the conserved dimer–dimer interface and the key contact residues between Spa33‐C and Spa33‐FL that were mutated in this study, Tyr221 and Leu141, being shown in blue. The secondary structure and residue numbering for Spa33‐C are shown above the sequence and alternative translation start sites within Spa33‐FL and YscQ‐FL are shown in red. The pairwise sequence identity between the SpoA2 and SpoA1 domain is given beside each pair of proteins from either the NF‐ or flagellar‐T3SS.

C. Mass spectrum obtained for Spa33‐C under non‐denaturing conditions. Multimeric assemblies are made of dimeric subunits, with monomers (dark green), dimers (yellow), trimers (blue) and tetramers (orange) distinguishable. Monomeric Spa33‐C (light green) is present due to gas phase dissociation. For each assigned complex, the charge state of the most intense peak is shown and a comparison of experimental and theoretical molecular mass is given in Table 3.

D. Mass spectrum of Spa33‐FL(CTD) complexes obtained under non‐denaturing conditions showing the presence of monomer (purple), dimer (magenta) and trimer (brown). For each assigned complex, the charge state of the most intense peak is shown and a comparison of experimental and theoretical molecular mass is given in Table 3.

E. Mass spectrum of Spa33‐FL(CTD)/C complexes obtained under non‐denaturing conditions. In addition to the oligomers of isolated Spa33‐FL(CTD) observed in B, Spa33‐C 2 (dark green), Spa33‐FL(CTD)/C 2 (blue) and Spa33‐FL(CTD)2/C 2 (yellow) species are also present. For each assigned complex, the charge state of the most intense peak is shown and a comparison of experimental and theoretical molecular mass is given in Table 3.

Spa33‐FL and orthologous NF‐T3SS proteins correspond to a fusion of FliM and FliN

Given the sequence and structural homology between the SpoA domains of Spa33‐C and FliN*, our finding that Spa33‐FL and Spa33‐C associate with a different stoichiometry from FliM and FliN* led us to suspect a fundamental difference in the structures formed by Spa33‐FL and FliM. We therefore searched the PDB using the fold and function assignment server (Jaroszewski et al., 2005) with the sequences of Spa33‐FL and homologues from other NF‐T3SS. Searching with residues 1–217 of Y. pseudotuberculosis YscQ‐FL returned the most significant alignments between an approximately 60 amino acid string immediately N‐terminal to the well‐characterised SpoA domain and the SpoA domains of HrcQB‐C (score ‐13.0), YscQ‐C (score ‐12.1) and FliN (score −10.3). Multiple sequence alignment of the equivalent regions of Spa33‐FL, YscQ‐FL and Salmonella typhimurium SpaO‐FL with their respective C‐terminal SpoA domains showed a pairwise sequence identity of 14–20%, comparable with the similarity between the C‐terminal SpoA domains of flagellar FliM and FliN (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, this alignment revealed a striking conservation of similar residues coincident with the secondary structure elements of Spa33208‐293 (Fig. 4B), suggesting that Spa33‐FL and orthologous NF‐T3SS proteins have two SpoA domains arranged in tandem (Fig. 5A): the characterised C‐terminal SpoA domain that is also present in Spa33‐C (SpoA2), and an additional SpoA domain immediately upstream (SpoA1).

Figure 5.

figure

A unified model for C‐ring assembly in the NF‐ and flagellar‐T3SS.

A. Model for C‐ring assembly by Spa33‐FL/C2. SpoA1, SpoA2 and the structurally uncharacterised N‐terminal domain of Spa33‐FL are coloured with respect to the primary sequence and tertiary structure schematic in green, blue and grey, respectively, whereas SpoA2 of Spa33‐C is coloured blue. An intramolecular pseudodimer formed by Spa33‐FL SpoA1 and SpoA2 interacts with an intermolecular homodimer of Spa33‐C SpoA2 to form a 1:2 complex that can subsequently oligomerise to form a spiral arrangement of dimers. The portion of Spa33‐FL found within the Spa33‐FL(CTD) construct is indicated.

B. Model for C‐ring assembly by FliM/FliN 3. SpoA1 and the structurally characterised N‐terminal domain of FliM are coloured with respect to the primary sequence and tertiary structure schematic in green and grey, respectively, whereas SpoA2 of FliN is coloured blue. An intermolecular heterodimer formed by FliM SpoA1 and FliN SpoA2 interacts with an intermolecular homodimer of FliN SpoA2 to form a 1:3 complex that can subsequently oligomerise to form a spiral arrangement of dimers.

C. Molecular model for the Spa33‐FL/C 2 complex. A model for the intramolecular pseudodimer formed by SpoA1 and SpoA2 of Spa33‐FL was made by replacing chain A of Spa33208‐293 with a SCWRL homology model (Canutescu et al., 2003) for Spa33‐FL SpoA1, constructed using the sequence alignment shown in Fig. 4B. The model for the 1:2 complex was made by preserving crystal contacts observed between Spa33208‐293 dimers and replacing one copy of Spa33208‐293 with the model for the Spa33‐FL intramolecular dimer. Sites mutated to probe assembly are highlighted as red spheres (Tyr221 – two copies from Spa33‐C chains and one from the SpoA2 domain of Spa33‐FL) or yellow spheres (Leu141 – in the SpoA1 domain of Spa33‐FL, at the position equivalent to Tyr221). Formation of the interface within the 1:2 assembly is built from Tyr221 within a Spa33‐C chain and Leu141 within the SpoA1 domain in Spa33‐FL.

D. Molecular model for linear arrays of Spa33‐FL/C 2. A lateral arrangement of the model shown in C was produced based on contacts observed in the Spa33208‐293 crystal. Assembly of the 1:2 complex into the linear array is driven by an interface where two Tyr221 residues meet (one from Spa33‐C and one from the SpoA2 domain of Spa33‐FL).

E. The Spa33‐FL/C 2 model shows a good correlation with the cryo‐EM map of the flagellar C‐ring. Molecular models for the Spa33‐FL/C 2 complex shown in C was manually positioned in the density corresponding to the cytoplasmic edge of the C‐ring in the C34 S . typhimurium  EM map contoured to 1σ (Thomas et al., 2006) (EMDB 1887).

We therefore hypothesised that SpoA1 and SpoA2 within Spa33‐FL could form an intramolecular pseudodimer that is structurally homologous to Spa33‐C2, with the 14 residue linker of an appropriate length to bridge ∼ 37 Å between the N‐ and C‐termini of the dimer chains. Substitution of chain A of the Spa33208‐293 crystal structure with a SCWRL homology model (Canutescu et al., 2003) of Spa33‐FL SpoA1 creates a model for this predicted pseudodimer with the appropriate surface distribution of polar residues and a hydrophobic core comprising the majority of conserved residues (Fig. 4B). In order to test this model, we carried out a series of native MS experiments. First, as expected, untagged Spa33‐C was shown to be predominantly dimeric, with the larger oligomers also observed always being built from the Spa33‐C2 building block (Fig. 4C) (a small amount of monomeric Spa33‐C was observed, but the charge state distribution indicated it was formed by gas phase dissociation and did not exist in solution). On the other hand, a construct comprising only SpoA1 and SpoA2 of Spa33‐FL (Spa33‐FL(CTD); Fig. 5A) was found to be predominantly monomeric by native MS (Fig. 4D), indicating the 60 residues upstream of the alternative translation start site that encompass SpoA1 are sufficient to prevent intermolecular dimer formation by the Spa33 SpoA2 domain. Furthermore, Spa33‐FL(CTD) also showed the propensity to oligomerise in a similar manner to Spa33‐C2 (Fig. 4D), implying shared structural properties between the domains. Crucially, Spa33‐FL(CTD) and Spa33‐C were subsequently found to form a minimal 1:2 complex (Fig. 4E), suggesting that the 1:2 stoichiometry for Spa33‐FL and Spa33‐C association likely arises through the interaction of a Spa33‐C2 homodimer with the intramolecular pseudodimer of Spa33‐FL.

In contrast, flagellar FliM only has the single C‐terminal SpoA domain, with the sequence immediately upstream forming a CheC/CheX phosphatase fold (Park et al., 2006) (Fig. 5B). Therefore, this orphan SpoA domain of FliM would only be able to dimerise through intermolecular interactions. Given our finding that T. maritima FliM and FliN* form a 1:3 complex, we propose that FliM forms a heterodimer with FliN* that subsequently interacts with a homodimer of FliN*. Indeed, a FliM/FliY heterodimer was a prominent species observed in the native mass spectrum of FliM/FliY complexes (Fig. S3C). Therefore, the 1:2 complex of Spa33‐FL/Spa33‐C and 1:3 complex of FliM/FliN* are both likely to represent a dimer of dimers arrangement of SpoA domains and are therefore entirely consistent with a conserved building block in NF‐ and flagellar‐C‐ring assembly.

A unified model for C‐ring assembly

In order to gain insights into the interaction of Spa33‐FL with Spa33‐C2, the intermolecular contacts of the Spa33208‐293 crystal were investigated and revealed a dimer–dimer interface formed by an equivalent surface of each homodimer, comprising regions proximal to the N‐terminus, C‐terminus and β3‐β4 turn from one chain and α1 from the other. This interaction buries a surface area of 508 Å2 and is stabilised by three hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions between apolar residues that are conserved with SpoA1 of Spa33‐FL and orthologous domains (Fig. 4B). In particular, Tyr221 makes a significant contribution to the interaction, fitting into a hydrophobic pocket formed by the interacting dimer (Val265/Val270/Trp289/Val291 and Ile239/Leu242/Lys243 of opposing chains) (Fig. S4). Strikingly, this packing arrangement is also conserved in the HrcQB‐C crystal lattice (Fadouloglou et al., 2004), despite the proteins only sharing 16% sequence identity, indicating a conserved mode of interaction by Spa33‐C orthologues (Fig. S5A) [this dimer–dimer interface is not present in the YscQ‐C crystal as the non‐native C‐terminal tag residues mask this interaction site (Fig. S5B) (Bzymek et al., 2012)]. Notably however, the conserved dimer–dimer interface is also similar to that proposed to be involved in formation of the ring‐shaped FliN tetramer (Paul and Blair, 2006) (Fig. S5C). In contrast to the closed tetramer of FliN, the Spa33208‐293 and HrcQB‐C assemblies form an open lock washer structure, with the concave surfaces of the saddle‐shaped dimers being offset laterally by ∼ 55° with respect to each other.

By replacing one dimer with our model for the intramolecular pseudodimer formed by Spa33‐FL, this arrangement of Spa33208‐293 dimers allows a molecular model for the 1:2 complex of Spa33‐FL/Spa33‐C to be constructed (Fig. 5C). Crucially, this open arrangement of the Spa33‐FL/Spa33‐C2 complex would allow each dimer to undergo further dimer–dimer interactions via the equivalent interfaces. Indeed, a continuous spiral of Spa33208‐293 dimers is observed in the crystal lattice, providing a molecular model for formation of higher molecular weight oligomers by the analogous dimers of Spa33‐FL/C2 (Fig. 5A and D). Furthermore, theoretical CCS values calculated from this linear model showed excellent agreement with the experimental CCS values obtained for Spa33‐FL/C2 oligomers (Fig. 3C), providing evidence for the formation of such elongated arrays in the gas phase.

In this model for high molecular weight oligomers of Spa33‐FL/C2, the interaction surfaces provided by Spa33‐C2 are essentially equivalent, whereas the two provided by the Spa33‐FL intramolecular pseudodimer would vary depending on which regions of SpoA1 and SpoA2 combine to form the binding site. Therefore, the interaction between Spa33‐FL and Spa33‐C2 is likely to occur with two different affinities depending on which Spa33‐FL binding site is involved, with the stronger likely mediating formation of the stable 1:2 complex and the weaker promoting further oligomerisation of this building block. To probe these interfaces, we designed point mutations based on the crystal contacts and a homology model for the SpoA1 domain of Spa33‐FL. This model (Fig. 5C and D) revealed that there was a potential difference in the key contacting residue making up these two interfaces with one being built from interactions of two copies of Tyr221, whereas the other was built from a single copy of Tyr221 and the equivalent residue in the SpoA1 domain, Leu141 (Fig. 4B). Mutation of Tyr221 to Arg in both the SpoA2 domain of Spa33‐FL and within the two copies Spa33‐C prevented oligomerisation beyond assembly of the 1:2 complex (Fig. S6A). SEC‐MALS confirmed that higher order oligomerisation of this mutant was impeded in solution, whereas a control Ala mutation of Lys235, a surface exposed residue remote from the proposed dimer–dimer interface, showed no change in oligomerisation relative to wild‐type Spa33‐FL/C2 (Fig. S6B). Further mutation in the Y221R background of Leu141 to Ala (Fig. 5C and D) led to Spa33‐FL becoming entirely insoluble consistent with the behaviour of this protein in the absence of Spa33‐C. These data support the hypothesis that the interface required to build the 1:2 complex is the mixed interface involving the SpoA1‐Spa33‐FL/Spa33‐C chains while that required to assemble the elongated array involves the sequence identical SpoA2‐Spa33‐FL/Spa33‐C chains. In order to test the functional relevance of this higher order assembly, allelic exchange was used to introduce the Y221R point mutation and the Y221R/L141A double mutation within the spa33 gene. Neither strain displayed secretion upon CR induction (Fig. S6C), indicating that the 1:2 complex alone is insufficient to support secretion.

Given the proximity of the Spa33208‐293 C‐terminus to the dimer–dimer interface in the crystal and the occlusion of this interaction site by the C‐terminal tag of YscQ‐C (Fig. S5B) (Bzymek et al., 2012), we reasoned that relatively small fusions to the C‐terminus of Spa33‐C would inhibit higher order assembly of the dimer. Indeed, addition of just an eight residue Strep‐tag to the C‐terminus of Spa33‐C2 (strep) within the 1:2 complex impeded further oligomerisation of this building block, with only up to four copies being observed in the native mass spectrum at very low abundance (Fig. S7A). Assembly was inhibited to an even greater extent for analogous thioredoxin (trx; 11.8 kDa) and maltose binding protein (mbp; 40.5 kDa) fusions, with the largest species observed being a dimer (Fig. S7B) and a monomer (Fig. S7C) of the 1:2 complex respectively. This is in agreement with in vivo data showing that a FliN‐YFP fusion is unable to complement for either swimming or swarming in an E. coli ΔfliN strain (Li and Sourjik, 2011).

The cryo‐EM reconstruction of the flagellar C‐ring from S. typhimurium has a continuous spiral of density 7.0 nm in diameter around the cytoplasmic edge of the C‐ring, which was previously suggested to fit a lock washer arrangement of SpoA domains (Thomas et al., 2006) such as that proposed here for Spa33‐FL/Spa33‐C2 (Fig. 5D). Indeed, positioning of the molecular model for the 1:2 complex within this density in the map (EMDB 1887) shows excellent agreement between the size and shape of Spa33‐FL/Spa33‐C2 and the density envelope (Fig. 5E). This fit not only provides further evidence for our models of Spa33‐FL/C2 and the high molecular weight oligomers it forms (Fig. 5A and D) but suggests a common mechanism of assembly for the NF‐ and flagellar C‐rings.

Discussion

The subunit of the NF‐T3SS C‐ring is generally encoded by just one gene, whereas the flagellar C‐ring is largely comprised of two distinct but homologous proteins, FliM and FliN, and so it was difficult to assess the extent to which C‐ring structure and function differed between these systems from early work (Brown et al., 2005; Morita‐Ishihara et al., 2006). In this study, we show that spa33 of the S. flexneri NF‐T3SS is alternatively translated in vivo to produce both the full‐length protein, Spa33‐FL, and also a construct comprising the C‐terminal third of the protein sequence, Spa33‐C. This is in agreement with recent findings from other NF‐T3SS, where two physiologically relevant translation products of Salmonella SPI‐2 ssaQ (Yu et al., 2011) and Yersinia yscQ (Bzymek et al., 2012) have also been identified, although the use of a GTG start codon instead of ATG seems so far to be a unique observation in Shigella. Indeed, the position of the Spa33‐C start site is conserved not only between these organisms, but with other as of yet uncharacterised homologues (Fig. S2), indicating that the expression of two products from one gene is a common strategy employed by NF‐T3SS. Furthermore, preliminary work from this study has hinted that T. maritima fliY could also be alternatively expressed in a similar manner to produce a FliN‐like protein, whereas several early studies showed that an alternative translation initiation site within E. coli FliN produces a fragment of the protein capable of supporting flagellar assembly (Irikura et al., 1993; Tang et al., 1995) (Fig. S2), suggesting that this mechanism could even be conserved in flagellar‐T3SS despite the presence of two protein‐coding genes.

Spa33‐FL and Spa33‐C form a complex in vivo, with both components being required for NF‐T3SS assembly and secretion, as previously observed for the Yersinia orthologues (Bzymek et al., 2012; Diepold et al., 2015). Furthermore, both YscQ‐FL and YscQ‐C are required for their localisation at the base of the NF‐T3SS (Diepold et al., 2015). Not only does this corroborate the pivotal role of these NF‐T3SS proteins for protein transport (Morita‐Ishihara et al., 2006; Lara‐Tejero et al., 2011), but also suggests that Spa33‐C is unlikely to just be acting as a chaperone for Spa33‐FL (Yu et al., 2011), with both proteins instead more likely to be integral structural components of the putative C‐ring in a similar manner to FliM and FliN. Indeed, our crystal structure of the SpoA2 domain of Spa33 revealed a highly intertwined homodimer that bears striking resemblance to both orthologous NF‐T3SS proteins (Fadouloglou et al., 2004; Bzymek et al., 2012) and flagellar FliN (Brown et al., 2005), with further characterisation revealing that Spa33‐C forms this observed dimer fold in solution with disordered N‐terminal extensions. Therefore, the sequence and structural homology between Spa33‐C and FliN would indicate they are likely to be playing a similar role in vivo within the C‐rings of NF‐ and flagellar‐T3SS.

Based on size and sequence similarities within their C‐terminal regions, Spa33‐FL and Spa33‐C, along with their SctQ orthologues, bear a striking resemblance to FliM and FliN respectively of the flagellar C‐ring. However, in this study, we present evidence that the full‐length SctQ proteins actually represent a fusion of FliM and FliN. This hypothesis is driven by two main observations. First, we have identified a second SpoA domain in the full‐length SctQ proteins, immediately N‐terminal to the well‐characterised C‐terminal domain. This SpoA1 domain shows a comparable level of sequence identity to the SpoA2 domain as the SpoA domains in FliM and FliN do to each other. Second, native MS has identified minimal Spa33‐FL/Spa33‐C2 and FliM/FliN3 complexes that are directly equivalent in terms of number and ratio of SpoA domains, i.e. one SpoA1 domain and three SpoA2 domains per complex. Specifically, we propose that one FliM (SpoA1) and one FliN (SpoA2) form an intermolecular heterodimer equivalent to an Spa33‐FL intramolecular SpoA1‐SpoA2 pseudodimer and that these then further associate with a FliN (SpoA2) homodimer and Spa33‐C (SpoA2) homodimer respectively.

Our results suggest that the structure formed by the N‐terminus of Spa33‐FL (Fig. 5A) is much smaller than the equivalent region of FliM (Fig. 5B) and therefore likely structurally distinct from its characterised CheC/CheX phosphatase fold (Park et al., 2006). Interestingly, based on sequence comparisons, the P. syringae NF‐T3SS C‐ring component HrcQA is likely to represent a hybrid protein, with the C‐terminus comprising a single SpoA1 domain like FliM (requiring the SpoA2 domain of HrcQB for dimer formation) and the N‐terminus a smaller domain similar in size to that of Spa33‐FL. Therefore, it is likely that the uncharacterised N‐terminal domain of Spa33‐FL orthologues could structurally and functionally differentiate NF‐C‐rings from their flagellar counterparts.

Previous modelling of the flagellar C‐ring has involved a FliM/FliN4 complex that was originally proposed on the basis of AUC measurements on the T. maritima FliM and FliN proteins (Brown et al., 2005). Our attempts to reproduce this complex using the same protein constructs led to native MS spectra that were complicated to interpret due to the presence of two different FliN species – the original sequence and a shorter fragment (FliN*). However, although they clearly showed a mixture of FliM/FliN complexes, we found no evidence for a 1:4 stoichiometry, with the dominant species being 1:3. A similar result was obtained using FliM complexed with full‐length FliY. We postulate that the complexity of the mixtures of species produced by coexpression of these proteins may give rise to averaged masses in sedimentation equilibrium AUC studies.

Several lines of evidence already present in the literature further support our molecular model for the 1:3 complex of FliM/FliN. Original estimates of protein copy numbers in the S. typhimurium C‐ring revealed ∼ 35 FliM and ∼ 111 FliN, in agreement with a 1:3 stoichiometry (Zhao et al., 1996). Similarly, a S. typhimurium mutant that only expresses a FliM–FliN fusion protein shows the propensity to form a limited number of fragmented C‐rings and could be complemented by the coexpression of FliN but not FliM (Kihara et al., 1996). This not only provides support for the association of FliN2 with a FliM/FliN heterodimer, but also directly mimics the SctQ proteins from the NF‐T3SS. Furthermore, this model also answers two questions that have been previously asked: (i) in the absence of dimerisation what fold does the orphan FliM SpoA domain assume, and (ii) why does the C‐terminal SpoA2 domain of Spa33‐FL not dimerise when the exact same sequence does in Spa33‐C? In both cases it has been suggested that the SpoA domain refolds into a monomeric, folded‐back structure in response to the presence of sequence at the N‐terminus (Sarkar et al., 2010; Bzymek et al., 2012). Our new model answers both of these questions using hetero‐dimerisation, removing the need for structural remodelling of a sequence that has only ever been observed in one conformation.

After initial submission of this manuscript, Notti et al. (2015) published a structure of the heterodimer formed by SpoA1/SpoA2 within S. typhimurium SpaO and provided in vivo data that suggest it is indeed formed intramolecularly. This dimer shows high structural homology to Spa33208‐293 (2.2 Å RMSD, 123 Cα atoms) (Fig. S8A), providing further evidence for the Spa33 SpoA1‐SpoA2 intramolecular dimer we have modelled and supporting our assertion that the SpoA1 domain is a conserved feature among NF‐T3SS C‐ring proteins. Furthermore, the crystal structure of a FliM(SpoA1)‐FliN(SpoA2) dimer shows the same fold (2.3 Å RMSD, 136 Cα atoms) (Fig. S8B) (Notti et al., 2015), indicating FliM and FliN are indeed able to heterodimerise as we have proposed.

Further analysis of the arrangement of Spa33 SpoA2 dimers within the crystal lattice revealed a dimer–dimer interface that is completely conserved in HrcQB‐C (Fadouloglou et al., 2004) crystals, despite the proteins sharing only 16% sequence identity. This allowed us to propose a molecular model for the Spa33‐FL/C2 complex, whereby the internal pseudodimer of Spa33‐FL interacts with a homodimer of Spa33‐C in an analogous manner to the crystal packing, thereby forming an open lock washer structure.

In addition, construction of a homology model of E. coli FliM/FliN based on our molecular model for Spa33‐FL/C2 allowed a subset of the residue pairs whose Cys‐mutants previously led to cross‐linking of FliM/FliN (Sarkar et al., 2010) to be mapped (Fig. S9). This reveals that Asn86/Met316, Asn72/Met260, Asn72/Met267 and Asn86/Met303 are within close proximity within our model (Fig. S9) and therefore that this cross‐linking data is as consistent with a 1:3 complex of FliM/FliN as the previous (FliN)4‐FliM‐(FliN)4 model (Sarkar et al., 2010). Furthermore, given the intimate association of FliM and FliN within the heterodimer, it can also be envisaged how a subset of dramatic non‐conservative surface mutations of FliN were shown to prevent its interaction with FliM (Sarkar et al., 2010), suggesting that our 1:3 model for FliM and FliN assembly is entirely consistent with previous results. This FliM/FliN3 model in the context of earlier proposals for location of further C‐ring components (Park et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2010) leads to a molecular model for the entire flagellar C‐ring consistent with the density observed in the S. typhimurium reconstruction (Fig. S10).

In this study, we also show that this Spa33‐FL/C2 building block can undergo further controlled and directed oligomerisation in vitro, as would be required for this complex to form an ordered C‐ring in vivo similar to that found in the flagellar‐T3SS. These higher order oligomers are functionally important, as mutation of residues that destroy the interface abolishes substrate secretion. We therefore believe this represents the first observation of intermediates in assembly of the NF‐T3SS C‐ring. The open arrangement of the 1:2 complex enables the formation of a linear array via the conserved dimer‐dimer interface, allowing us to construct a molecular model for Spa33‐FL/C2 oligomers that shows good agreement with the shape of the high molecular weight species observed in the gas phase. Although our modelled and observed oligomers of Spa33‐FL/C2 are clearly elongated, formation of a closed ring structure would only require 10°–16° curvature per subunit to form a 22–34 member C‐ring, with the rotated dimer‐dimer interface observed in the FliN crystal (Fig. S5C) indicating that such flexibility in the interaction may be possible. Furthermore, the established interaction between Spa33 homologues and the basal body of the NF‐T3SS basal body (Morita‐Ishihara et al., 2006; Diepold et al., 2010; Barison et al., 2012) may be required to template C‐ring formation in vivo. However, positioning of our model into the cryo‐EM reconstruction of the S. typhimurium C‐ring (Thomas et al., 2006) reveals a striking correlation between the size and shape of Spa33‐FL/C2 and the spiral density at the cytoplasmic edge of the flagellar C‐ring, indicating this is likely to represent a physiologically relevant model for C‐ring assembly. This same spiral packing is observed within the crystal lattice of the newly released FliM/FliN heterodimer structure (Notti et al., 2015) and also provides a good fit to the EM density (Fig. S8C), indicating there is indeed conservation between the mode of assembly of NF‐ and flagellar C‐ring components.

Despite the wealth of other data suggesting an essential role for SctQ proteins at the base of the NF‐T3SS (Morita‐Ishihara et al., 2006; Diepold et al., 2010; Lara‐Tejero et al., 2011; Bzymek et al., 2012), it has remained controversial whether these systems have an organised substructure akin to the flagellar C‐ring. Recently, specific EM density for Spa33 in the expected position for a C‐ring was identified for the first time within the S. flexneri NF‐T3SS, although the tomograms showed six discrete Spa33‐FL/C2 ‘pods’ rather than a contiguous C‐ring (Hu et al., 2015). Although it is reasonable that the flagellar C‐ring structure could be remarkably different to account for its additional role in flagellar rotation and switching, the pods may also represent a subset of the Spa33‐FL/C2 population that is most stably associated with the sorting platform (presumably those subunits that are linked to the hexameric ATPase via SctL), perhaps comparable with the slow‐exchanging FliM population in the flagellar C‐ring (Delalez et al., 2010; Lele et al., 2012). Indeed, the observation that ∼ 22 copies of fluorescently‐labelled YscQ‐FL are localised at the base of the Yersinia NF‐T3SS still implies the formation of a larger structure (Diepold et al., 2015). Furthermore, the finding that subunits of both the NF‐ (Diepold et al., 2015) and flagellar (Delalez et al., 2010; Lele et al., 2012) C‐rings undergo rapid exchange in vivo is in agreement with the dynamic oligomerisation of Spa33‐FL/C2 observed in this study and indicates the putative NF‐T3SS C‐ring is unlikely to be a stable structure, perhaps explaining why it has been so hard to visualise in initial EM studies (Kawamoto et al., 2013; Kudryashev et al., 2013) and why more dynamic regions could plausibly still be missing in the most recent tomogram (Hu et al., 2015). Although further in situ characterisation of the NF‐T3SS C‐ring is clearly required, results from this study suggest that these systems have all the makings of a substructure highly similar to the flagellar C‐ring and that the molecular mechanisms of assembly of at least the subcomplexes of NF and flagellar C‐ring are fundamentally conserved.

Experimental procedures

DNA plasmids and mutagenesis

All constructs were created for this study (Table S1) either using the primers outlined (Table S2) or by Eurogentec. Unless otherwise stated, PCR products were subcloned into purified empty vectors digested with FastDigest enzymes (Fermentas) using the In‐Fusion PCR cloning system (Clontech). The Quikchange XL site‐directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) was used to create all subsequent point mutations, deletions and insertions. All constructs were verified by DNA sequencing.

Recombinant protein expression and purification

Spa33‐FL/C2, Spa33‐FL/C2(Y221R), Spa33‐FL/C2(L141A/Y221R), Spa33208‐293, Spa33‐FL(CTD) and T. maritima FliM/FliN, FliM/FliY and FliM/FliN* were expressed from pET28b‐Spa33, pET28b‐Spa33(Y221R), pET28b‐Spa33(L141A/Y221R), pET28b‐Spa33208‐293, pETDuet‐Spa33‐FL(CTD), pETDuet‐FliM/FliN, pETDuet‐FliM/FliY and pETDuet‐FliM/FliN* plasmids (Table S1) respectively in E. coli B834 (DE3) grown in 4 × 1 l LB medium (Fisher Scientific UK). The Spa33‐FL(CTD)/C2, Spa33‐FL/Cstrep, Spa33‐FL/Ctrx and Spa33‐FL/Cmbp complexes were produced by coexpression from the pETDuet‐Spa33‐FL(CTD)/pRSFDuet‐Spa33‐C, pETDuet‐Spa33ΔRBS/pRSFDuet‐Spa33‐Cstrep, pETDuet‐Spa33ΔRBS/pRSFDuet‐Spa33‐Ctrx and pETDuet‐Spa33ΔRBS/pRSFDuet‐Spa33‐Cmbp plasmid pairs (Table S1) in a similar manner. Spa33‐C and Spa33‐CΔN were expressed as 15N‐labelled proteins from pET28b‐Spa33‐C and pET28b‐Spa33‐CΔN plasmids (Table S1) respectively in E. coli BL21 (DE3) grown in 2 × 1 l 15N‐labelled M9 minimal medium. Cells were generally grown at 37°C until A600 nm of ∼ 0.6 was reached, and then protein expression was induced overnight at 21°C with 1 mM IPTG. Cells were lysed in buffer containing 50 mM Tris‐HCl pH7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT and a Protease Inhibitor tablet (Pierce) using an Emulsiflex‐C5 Homogeniser (GC Technologies) and the His‐tagged protein within the clarified lysate extracted using a 5 ml Ni2+‐NTA superflow cartridge (Qiagen). Tags were removed from some constructs overnight during dialysis at 4°C, using thrombin (Amersham Biosciences) for Spa33‐C and Spa33‐CΔN and carboxypeptidase A (Sigma Aldrich) for Spa33208‐293. SEC was then carried out using a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 200 pg (GE Healthcare) column equilibrated in 20 mM Tris‐HCl pH7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM TCEP.

Western blotting

Rabbit anti‐Spa33 polyclonal antibodies were raised against untagged Spa33208‐293 and purified using a Spa33208‐293 affinity column by Eurogentec. Samples were separated via SDS‐PAGE and transferred to a Hybond‐P membrane (GE Healthcare) using a trans‐blot semi‐dry transfer cell (Bio‐Rad) for 1 h at 22 V. Membranes were blocked overnight at 4°C in 2% w/v milk, 1× PBS and 0.1% v/v Tween. α‐Spa33 was used as the primary antibody at 1:1000–1:50 000 dilutions, whereas a HRP‐conjugated anti‐rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Promega) was used at 1:2500 dilution. Membranes were developed with an ECL Western Blotting System (GE Healthcare) and exposed to Amersham Hyperfilm ECL (GE Healthcare).

Crystallisation and structure determination of Spa33208‐293

The 10 mg ml−1 Spa33208‐293 was crystallised at 21°C by the vapour‐diffusion sitting‐drop method in 400 nl drops at a 1:1 ratio with 10% (v/v) isopropanol, 0.1 M Na HEPES pH7.0, 10% (w/v) PEG 4000 using an OryxNano Crystallisation Robot (Douglas Instruments). Crystals were cryo‐protected with 1:4 (v/v) ethylene glycol : mother liquor and flash‐frozen in liquid N2. Diffraction images were collected at beamline I04 of the Diamond Light Source (Oxfordshire, UK) and processed as P212121 using the Xia2 pipeline in the 3dii mode (Winter, 2010). Initial phases were calculated following molecular replacement using Phaser (McCoy et al., 2007) with an ensemble of T. maritima FliN (pdb id 1YAB) and P. syringae HrcQB‐C (pdb id 1O9Y) chainsaw (Stein, 2008) models, trimmed to remove regions of poor structural alignment. The model was rebuilt and refined iteratively using Coot (Emsley et al., 2010) and autoBUSTER (Blanc et al., 2004) or Phenix (Adams et al., 2010) but Rfree stalled around 30% and the maps contained almost no ordered solvent despite the 2.3 Å resolution. Running the data through Xtriage suggested the data may be twinned and suggested reprocessing in P21 which was carried out using Xia2 in the 3daii mode (Table 2). Two copies of the Spa33208‐293 dimer were placed using Phaser and refined in Phenix using the twin law (h, ‐k, ‐l). The model was rebuilt and refined iteratively using Coot and Phenix. Protein chemistry was validated using Molprobity (Davis et al., 2007) and the final model visualised with PyMol (Schrödinger). The co‐ordinates for Spa33208‐293 have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank as entry pdb id 4TT9.

NMR spectroscopy

15N‐labelled Spa33‐C and Spa33‐CΔN were dialysed into 20 mM Tris‐HCl pH7.5, 50 mM NaCl to improve spectral quality. All samples were diluted to 100 μM protein and supplemented with 5% v/v D2O. 1H,15N‐HSQC spectra were recorded at 25°C on a Bruker Avance II 500 MHz spectrometer. Spectra were processed using TopSpin (Bruker) and analysed with Sparky (Goddard and Kneller, 2001).

Native MS

Samples were buffer‐exchanged in 200 mM ammonium acetate pH 7.5 using benchtop size‐exclusion columns (Micro‐Biospin 6, Bio‐Rad) and directly loaded on borosilicate needles prepared in‐house (Hernandez and Robinson, 2007). All the experiments were performed on a hybrid quadrupole ion mobility time‐of‐flight mass spectrometer (Synapt HDMS, Waters) modified for the transmission of high molecular weight complexes and for the determination of absolute collision cross‐sections without any prior calibration (Bush et al., 2010). The parameters used for the IM‐MS analysis were the following: 1.5 kV, 20 V, 0.8 V and 10 V for the capillary, sample cone, extraction cone and trap cell voltages. Drift times were recorded with drift voltages ranging from 50 to 100 V with 10 V increments. Gas pressures were set at 6.7e‐3, 6.7e‐2, 4.6 and 2.4e‐6 bar in the source, quadrupole, trap (argon at 5 ml min−1) and mobility cell (helium at 50 ml min−1) respectively. The data were recorded and analysed with MassLynx and Driftscope softwares (Waters), and the spectra were calibrated using a 100 mg ml−1 solution of cesium iodide. Theoretical collision cross‐sections of pdb files and generated models were measured using the scaled projection approximation method (Benesch and Ruotolo, 2011). When calculating CCS values for assemblies for which only a partial atomic structure was available, the mass for missing atoms m was taken into account through incrementing CCS measures by (n*m)**(2/3), where n is the number of subunits in the assembly.

MALS

SEC was performed on Superdex 200 10/300 column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated in 20 mM Tris‐HCl pH7.5, 150 mM NaCl. 100 μl of protein was injected at increasing concentrations and eluted at 0.4 ml min−1. The column was followed in line by a Dawn Heleos‐II light scattering detector (Wyatt Technologies) and an Optilab‐Rex refractive index monitor (Wyatt Technologies). Molecular mass calculations were performed using ASTRA 6.1.1.17 (Wyatt Technologies) assuming a dn/dc value of 0.186 ml g−1.

Construction of S . flexneri strains

Approximately 1 kb of DNA upstream and downstream of spa33 was amplified from S. flexneri M90T (M90T; Table 1) virulence plasmid and joined to each side of an amplified sacB‐kanR cassette (Blomfield et al., 1991) via the Gibson Assembly reaction, according to manufacturer guidelines (New England Biolabs) and using the primers outlined (Table S2). The resulting linear construct was integrated into the virulence plasmid using the λ Red system expressed from the pKD46 plasmid (Table S1) (Datsenko and Wanner, 2000) and selected on kanamycin to produce an intermediate strain for allelic exchange (GMCT113; Table 1).

Variant spa33 sequences were amplified with mutagenic primers (Table S2) and cloned into a derivative of the temperature‐sensitive vector pKO3 (Link et al., 1997) lacking its own copy of the sacB gene. These constructs (Table S1) were used to carry out the allelic exchange (Blomfield et al., 1991). Briefly, vectors were electroporated into GMCT113 and transformants selected on chloramphenicol at 30°C. The resulting vector‐containing cells were passaged in antibiotic‐free liquid medium for 3 h at 42°C and plated on chloramphenicol at 42°C to obtain vector integrates in the virulence plasmid. Subsequently, cells were grown again in antibiotic‐free liquid medium for 3 h at 42°C and then plated at 30°C on media containing 10% sucrose but lacking NaCl. Cells that formed colonies on sucrose had successfully excised the sacB‐kanR cassette. These sucrose‐resistant colonies were screened for sensitivity to kanamycin and chloramphenicol, confirming both curing of the vector and excision of the kanR marker. Finally, the spa33 gene and flanking regions were sequenced to confirm the presence of the desired allele with no further mutations.

CR induction assay

Shigella flexneri strains (Table 1) were grown in TCSB at 37°C until A600nm of ∼ 1.0, at which point samples were taken for Western blotting of whole cell lysate. The CR induction assay was then performed as described previously (Kenjale et al., 2005). Twenty microlitres of bacterial supernatant was separated by SDS‐PAGE and silver‐stained with the SilverXpress kit (Invitrogen).

Supporting information

Supporting information

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Pietro Roversi and other members of the Lea lab for assistance with data collection and processing and Dr. Ian Blomfield for helpful discussions about the allelic exchange experiments. We acknowledge Diamond Light Source for time on I04 under proposal MX9306. M.A.M. and J.E.D. were funded by grant 083599 and Investigator Award 100298, both from the Wellcome Trust to S.M.L. S.J. was funded by grant G0900888, Y.F. by grant M011984, both from the Medical Research Council (UK) to S.M.L. and C.T.

References

  1. Abrusci, P. , McDowell, M.A. , Lea, S.M. , and Johnson, S. (2014) Building a secreting nanomachine: a structural overview of the T3SS. Curr Opin Struct Biol 25: 111–117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams, P.D. , Afonine, P.V. , Bunkoczi, G. , Chen, V.B. , Davis, I.W. , Echols, N. , et al (2010) PHENIX: a comprehensive Python‐based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallographica Section D 66: 213–221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bahrani, F. , Sansonetti, P. , and Parsot, C. (1997) Secretion of Ipa proteins by Shigella flexneri: inducer molecules and kinetics of activation. Infect Immun 65: 4005–4010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barison, N. , Lambers, J. , Hurwitz, R. , and Kolbe, M. (2012) Interaction of MxiG with the cytosolic complex of the type III secretion system controls Shigella virulence. FASEB J 26: 1717–1726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Benesch, J.L.P. , and Ruotolo, B.T. (2011) Mass spectrometry: come of age for structural and dynamical biology. Curr Opin Struct Biol 21: 641–649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Biemans‐Oldehinkel, E. , Sal‐Man, N. , Deng, W. , Foster, L.J. , and Finlay, B.B. (2011) Quantitative proteomic analysis reveals formation of an EscL‐EscQ‐EscN type III complex in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli . J Bacteriol 193: 5514–5519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blanc, E. , Roversi, P. , Vonrhein, C. , Flensburg, C. , Lea, S.M. , and Bricogne, G. (2004) Refinement of severely incomplete structures with maximum likelihood in BUSTER‐TNT. Acta Crystallographica Section D 60: 2210–2221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Blocker, A. , Gounon, P. , Larquet, E. , Niebuhr, K. , Cabiaux, V. , Parsot, C. , et al (1999) The tripartite type III secreton of Shigella flexneri inserts IpaB and IpaC into host membranes. J Cell Biol 147: 683–693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Blomfield, I.C. , Vaughn, V. , Rest, R.F. , and Eisenstein, B.I. (1991) Allelic exchange in Escherichia coli using the Bacillus subtilis sacB gene and a temperature‐sensitive pSC101 replicon. Mol Microbiol 5: 1447–1457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, P.N. , Mathews, M.A.A. , Joss, L.A. , Hill, C.P. , and Blair, D.F. (2005) Crystal structure of the flagellar rotor protein FliN from Thermotoga maritima . J Bacteriol 187: 2890–2902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bush, M.F. , Hall, Z. , Giles, K. , Hoyes, J. , Robinson, C.V. , and Ruotolo, B.T. (2010) Collision cross sections of proteins and their complexes: a calibration framework and database for gas‐phase structural biology. Anal Chem 82: 9557–9565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Büttner, D. (2012) Protein export according to schedule: architecture, assembly, and regulation of type III secretion systems from plant‐ and animal‐pathogenic bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76: 262–310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bzymek, K.P. , Hamaoka, B.Y. , and Ghosh, P. (2012) Two translation products of Yersinia yscQ assemble to form a complex essential to type III secretion. Biochemistry 51: 1669–1677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Canutescu, A.A. , Shelenkov, A.A. , and Dunbrack, R.L. (2003) A graph‐theory algorithm for rapid protein side‐chain prediction. Protein Sci 12: 2001–2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chenna, R. , Sugawara, H. , Koike, T. , Lopez, R. , Gibson, T.J. , Higgins, D.G. , et al (2003) Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3497–3500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cornelis, G.R. (2006) The type III secretion injectisome. Nat Rev Microbiol 4: 811–825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Datsenko, K.A. , and Wanner, B.L. (2000) One‐step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K‐12 using PCR products. PNAS 97: 6640–6645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Davis, I.W. , Leaver‐Fay, A. , Chen, V.B. , Block, J.N. , Kapral, G.J. , Wang, X. , et al (2007) MolProbity: all‐atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucl Acids Res 35: W375–W383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Delalez, N.J. , Wadhams, G.H. , Rosser, G. , Xue, Q. , Brown, M.T. , Dobbie, I.M. , et al (2010) Signal‐dependent turnover of the bacterial flagellar switch protein FliM. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 11347–11351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Diepold, A. , and Wagner, S. (2014) Assembly of the bacterial type III secretion machinery. FEMS Microbiol Rev 38: 802–822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Diepold, A. , Amstutz, M. , Abel, S. , Sorg, I. , Jenal, U. , and Cornelis, G.R. (2010) Deciphering the assembly of the Yersinia type III secretion injectisome. EMBO J 29: 1928–1940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Diepold, A. , Kudryashev, M. , Delalez, N.J. , Berry, R.M. , and Armitage, J.P. (2015) Composition, formation, and regulation of the cytosolic c‐ring, a dynamic component of the type III secretion injectisome. PLoS Biol 13: e1002039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Emsley, P. , Lohkamp, B. , Scott, W.G. , and Cowtan, K. (2010) Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallographica Section D 66: 486–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fadouloglou, V.E. , Tampakaki, A.P. , Glykos, N.M. , Bastaki, M.N. , Hadden, J.M. , Phillips, S.E. , et al (2004) Structure of HrcQB‐C, a conserved component of the bacterial type III secretion systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 70–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Goddard, T.D. , and Kneller, D.G. (2001) SPARKY 3 https://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/home/sparky/. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gouet, P. , Robert, X. , and Courcelle, E. (2003) ESPript/ENDscript: extracting and rendering sequence and 3D information from atomic structures of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3320–3323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hernandez, H. , and Robinson, C.V. (2007) Determining the stoichiometry and interactions of macromolecular assemblies from mass spectrometry. Nat Protocols 2: 715–726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hu, B. , Morado, D.R. , Margolin, W. , Rohde, J.R. , Arizmendi, O. , Picking, W.L. , et al (2015) Visualization of the type III secretion sorting platform of Shigella flexneri . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112: 1047–1052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Irikura, V.M. , Kihara, M. , Yamaguchi, S. , Sockett, H. , and Macnab, R.M. (1993) Salmonella typhimurium fliG and fliN mutations causing defects in assembly, rotation, and switching of the flagellar motor. J Bacteriol 175: 802–810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jackson, M.W. , and Plano, G.V. (2000) Interactions between type III secretion apparatus components from Yersinia pestis detected using the yeast two‐hybrid system. FEMS Microbiol Lett 186: 85–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Jaroszewski, L. , Rychlewski, L. , Li, Z. , Li, W. , and Godzik, A. (2005) FFAS03: a server for profile–profile sequence alignments. Nucleic Acids Res 33: W284–W288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Johnson, D.L. , Stone, C.B. , and Mahony, J.B. (2008) Interactions between CdsD, CdsQ, and CdsL, three putative Chlamydophila pneumoniae type III se cretion proteins. J Bacteriol 190: 2972–2980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Johnson, S. , and Blocker, A. (2008) Characterization of soluble complexes of the Shigella flexneri type III secretion system ATPase. FEMS Microbiol Lett 286: 274–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kawamoto, A. , Morimoto, Y.V. , Miyata, T. , Minamino, T. , Hughes, K.T. , Kato, T. , et al (2013) Common and distinct structural features of Salmonella injectisome and flagellar basal body. Sci Rep 3: 3369. doi: 10.1038/srep03369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kenjale, R. , Wilson, J. , Zenk, S.F. , Saurya, S. , Picking, W.L. , Picking, W.D. , et al (2005) The needle component of the type III secreton of Shigella regulates the activity of the secretion apparatus. J Biol Chem 280: 42929–42937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kihara, M. , Francis, N.R. , DeRosier, D.J. , and Macnab, R.M. (1996) Analysis of a FliM‐FliN flagellar switch fusion mutant of Salmonella typhimurium . J Bacteriol 178: 4582–4589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kotloff, K.L. , Winickoff, J.P. , Ivanoff, B. , Clemens, J.D. , Swerdlow, D.L. , Sansonetti, P.J. , et al (1999) Global burden of Shigella infections: implications for vaccine development and implementation of control strategies. Bull World Health Organ 77: 651–666. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kudryashev, M. , Stenta, M. , Schmelz, S. , Amstutz, M. , Wiesand, U. , Castaño‐Díez, D. , et al (2013) In situ structural analysis of the Yersinia enterocolitica injectisome. eLife 2: e00792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lara‐Tejero, M. , Kato, J. , Wagner, S. , Liu, X. , and Galan, J.E. (2011) A sorting platform determines the order of protein secretion in bacterial type III systems. Science 331: 1188–1191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lee, L.K. , Ginsburg, M.A. , Crovace, C. , Donohoe, M. , and Stock, D. (2010) Structure of the torque ring of the flagellar motor and the molecular basis for rotational switching. Nature 466: 996–1000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lele, P.P. , Branch, R.W. , Nathan, V.S.J. , and Berg, H.C. (2012) Mechanism for adaptive remodeling of the bacterial flagellar switch. PNAS 109: 20018–20022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Li, H. , and Sourjik, V. (2011) Assembly and stability of flagellar motor in Escherichia coli . Mol Microbiol 80: 886–899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Link, A.J. , Phillips, D. , and Church, G.M. (1997) Methods for generating precise deletions and insertions in the genome of wild‐type Escherichia coli: application to open reading frame characterization. J Bacteriol 179: 6228–6237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. McCoy, A.J. , Grosse‐Kunstleve, R.W. , Adams, P.D. , Winn, M.D. , Storoni, L.C. , and Read, R.J. (2007) Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Crystallogr 40: 658–674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Marcoux, J. , and Robinson, C.V. (2013) Twenty years of gas phase structural biology. Structure 21: 1541–1550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Marlovits, T.C. , and Stebbins, C.E. (2010) Type III secretion systems shape up as they ship out. Curr Opin Microbiol 13: 47–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Minamino, T. , Yoshimura, S.D.J. , Morimoto, Y.V. , González‐Pedrajo, B. , Kami‐ike, N. , and Namba, K. (2009) Roles of the extreme N‐terminal region of FliH for efficient localization of the FliH–FliI complex to the bacterial flagellar type III export apparatus. Mol Microbiol 74: 1471–1483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Morita‐Ishihara, T. , Ogawa, M. , Sagara, H. , Yoshida, M. , Katayama, E. , and Sasakawa, C. (2006) Shigella Spa33 Is an essential C‐ring component of type III secretion machinery. J Biol Chem 281: 599–607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Notti, R.Q. , Bhattacharya, S. , Lilic, M. , and Stebbins, C.E. (2015) A common assembly module in injectisome and flagellar type III secretion sorting platforms. Nat Commun 6: 7125. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Park, S.‐Y. , Lowder, B. , Bilwes, A.M. , Blair, D.F. , and Crane, B.R. (2006) Structure of FliM provides insight into assembly of the switch complex in the bacterial flagella motor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 11886–11891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Paul, K. , and Blair, D.F. (2006) Organization of FliN subunits in the flagellar motor of Escherichia coli . J Bacteriol 188: 2502–2511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sansonetti, P.J. , Kopecko, D.J. , and Formal, S.B. (1982) Involvement of a plasmid in the invasive ability of Shigella flexneri . Infect Immun 35: 852–860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sarkar, M.K. , Paul, K. , and Blair, D.F. (2010) Subunit organization and reversal‐associated movements in the flagellar switch of Escherichia coli . J Biol Chem 285: 675–684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sircar, R. , Greenswag, A.R. , Bilwes, A.M. , Gonzalez‐Bonet, G. , and Crane, B.R. (2013) Structure and activity of the flagellar rotor protein FliY: a member of the CheC phosphatase family. J Biol Chem 288: 13493–13502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Stein, N. (2008) CHAINSAW: a program for mutating pdb files used as templates in molecular replacement. J Appl Crystallogr 41: 641–643. [Google Scholar]
  56. Tang, H. , Billings, S. , Wang, X. , Sharp, L. , and Blair, D.F. (1995) Regulated underexpression and overexpression of the FliN protein of Escherichia coli and evidence for an interaction between FliN and FliM in the flagellar motor. J Bacteriol 177: 3496–3503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Thomas, D.R. , Francis, N.R. , Xu, C. , and DeRosier, D.J. (2006) The three‐dimensional structure of the flagellar rotor from a clockwise‐locked mutant of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium. J Bacteriol 188: 7039–7048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Vogler, A.P. , Homma, M. , Irikura, V.M. , and Macnab, R.M. (1991) Salmonella typhimurium mutants defective in flagellar filament regrowth and sequence similarity of FliI to F0F1, vacuolar, and archaebacterial ATPase subunits. J Bacteriol 173: 3564–3572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Winter, G. (2010) xia2: an expert system for macromolecular crystallography data reduction. J Appl Crystallogr 43: 186–190. [Google Scholar]
  60. Yu, X.‐J. , Liu, M. , Matthews, S. , and Holden, D.W. (2011) Tandem translation generates a chaperone for the Salmonella type III secretion system protein SsaQ. J Biol Chem 286: 36098–36107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhao, R. , Pathak, N. , Jaffe, H. , Reese, T.S. , and Khan, S. (1996) FliN is a major structural protein of the C‐ring in the Salmonella typhimurium flagellar basal body. J Mol Biol 261: 195–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting information


Articles from Molecular Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES