Abstract
Oxidative and nitrosative stress have been implicated in high sodium diet (HSD)-related hypertensive renal injury. In the present study we investigated AT2R-mediated renoprotection in obese Zucker rats fed HSD. Obese Zucker rats were fed normal sodium-diet (NSD) or HSD 4%, for 14 days, with/without AT2R agonist C21, delivered subcutaneously via osmotic pump, 1 mg/kg/day. Compared to NSD controls, HSD rats exhibited increase in cortical NADPH oxidase activity, urinary H2O2 and 8-isoprostanes, which were associated with severe glomerulosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis, decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and an increase in urinary leak and activity of N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase, a lysosomal enzyme and a marker of tubular damage. These changes were improved by C21 treatment. Cortical expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), p-eNOS (Ser1177) and plasma nitrites were reduced after HSD intake while nitrosative stress (3-nitrotyrosine) and enzymatic defense (superoxide dismutase-to-catalase activity) remained unaltered. Albeit, C21 preserved plasma nitrites in HSD-fed OZR. C21 treatment reduced protein-to-creatinine (uPcr), albumin-to-creatinine (uAcr) as well as fractional excretion of protein (FEpro) and albumin (FEalb) in HSD-fed OZR, which is independent of changes in protein recycling receptors, megalin and cubilin. HSD intake also altered renal excretory and reabsorptive capacity as evident by elevated plasma urea nitrogen-to-creatinine (UN-to-cr) and fractional excretion of urea nitrogen (FEUN), and reduced urine-to-plasma creatinine (UPcr), which were modestly, but insignificantly, improved by C21 treatment. Together results demonstrate that AT2R activation protects against HSD-induced kidney damage in obesity plausibly by reducing NOX activity and rescuing nitrites.
Keywords: AT2 receptor, compound 21, high sodium diet, oxidative stress, kidney damage
Introduction
Hyperactive local angiotensin (Ang) II-AT1R signaling in kidney can operate independently of a systemic RAS and is a key player in pathogenesis of progressive hypertensive chronic kidney diseases (CKD).1-3 Recent analysis revealed that much of continuing increase in number of patients with CKD is seen in obese hypertensive patients.4 Various animal models have been employed to gain more insight into the pathogenesis of CKD associated with obesity hypertension. One of the validated models is the obese Zucker rat (OZR). These rats may or may not be hypertensive as such, but exhibit gradual increase in blood pressure5 and classical morphological characteristics of non-immune-spontaneous focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) just in 14 days when fed high sodium diet (HSD, 4%).6 HSD intake also increased renal content of Ang-II in obese rats.5,7 Lavaud et al8 and others9,10 held non-hemodynamic factors responsible for this event; because glomerular hemodynamic function remained unchanged in obese and lean Zucker rat. Experimental and clinical reports point at essential events associated with HSD-related pathologies of hypertension and CKD: oxidative11-13 and nitrosative stress and renal immune cell infiltration.
Progression of chronic kidney disease is predicted by (i) glomerular filtration rate, (ii) fractional excretion of protein (FEpro) and albumin (FEalb), and (iii) an absolute comparison of urinary albumin-to-protein ratio (uAPr). Under normal conditions, the glomerulus filters significant protein, most of which is retrieved by tubular receptors (megalin, cubilin), processed through lysosomal pathway in amino acids which are delivered back into circulation. Thus, under normal circumstances protein remains undetected in urine. FEpro, FEalb and uAPr have reliable predictive values in characterizing renal damage, glomerular (albuminuria>proteinuria) or tubular (proteinuria>albuminuria), as it represents glomerular filtration function with increased glomerular permeability.14-19 In addition to these indices, determination of urinary activity of N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), one of the best characterized tubular lysosomal enzyme helps distinguish renal tubular injury. Their comprehensive assessment in OZR model of salt-induced kidney damage hasn't been reported.
Renal AT2R, while sparsely expressed in healthy tissues, is upregulated in obesity,20 diabetes21 and tissue damage22 and considered endogenous defense by virtue of its own actions and by antagonizing AT1R-mediated deleterious actions. Recently, AT2R activation by preferential agonists C21 and CGP42122A has showed natriuretic and blood pressure reducing effects, as well as GFR improvement in HSD-fed obese rats.5 AT2R also have anti-inflammatory,23 anti-proliferative and anti-fibrotic effects,24 which are important in preventing disease progression. Also, there is indication that AT2Rs may be involved in anti-oxidative stress activities.25 Pharmacological inhibition of AT2R by PD123319 has shown to increase oxidative stress in vitro26,27 and in vivo.28 AT2R stimulation by CGP42112 caused a decrease in (rotenone+Ang-II)-induced NADPH oxidase (NOX) activity and mRNA expression of NOX units in in vitro CATH.a model of Parkinson's disease.29 Recently, C21, which is a non-peptide orally active AT2R agonist, has been shown to reduce superoxide formation in cryo-sections of aorta of stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats24 and frozen sections of ischemic cerebral hemisphere.30 However, in study of Rehman et al24 C21 did not reduce NOX activity. It is unknown whether direct AT2R stimulation by a preferential agonist reduces oxidative stress and protects against salt-induced kidney damage in obesity. Therefore, the present study investigated the role of AT2R selective activation by C21 in oxidative stress and reno-protection in terms of kidney structure and function in high salt fed obese Zucker rats.
Methods
Experimental protocol
Male obese Zucker rats (12-14 week) were purchased from Harlan, Indianapolis, IN. After arrival, the animals were housed in the University of Houston animal care facility. Animal experimental protocols used in this study were approved by the IACUC at the University of Houston and adhere to the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Animals were treated with AT2R agonist C21 (1 mg/kg/day) subcutaneously via Alzet® osmotic pump (Model 2ML2, Durect Corporation, Cupertino, CA) while maintained on either normal (NSD, 0.4%) or high sodium diet (HSD, 4%) for 14 days. In the present study, the subcutaneous delivery rate ∼0.42 μg/min (or ∼605 μg/day) was chosen to maintain the daily dose of C21 (1 mg/kg/day) as we reported earlier.5 This dose of C21 is considered AT2R selective as another study from our laboratory7, i.v.)-induced natriuresis was blocked by AT2R antagonist PD123319. Control obese rats were implanted with osmotic pumps filled with normal sterile saline while maintained on either NSD or HSD for 14 days. Each of the groups had n=8 animals. Rats were placed in metabolic cages during terminal four days for urine collection over the last 3 days. Twenty four-hour food and water intake was recorded. After treatment, blood was collected via cardiac puncture, processed for plasma preparation and stored at -80°C. Kidney cortices were snap-frozen and stored at -80°C. The kidney cortices were homogenized in the buffer containing (in mM) Tris 50, EDTA 10, PMSF 1 and protease inhibitors.
For detailed various assay methods, please refer to the online-only Data Supplement.
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as mean±SEM. The data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 5 and subjected to one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's Multiple Comparison post hoc Test, *p<0.05, n=8 per group.
Results
General parameters
In comparison to obese control rats, HSD-fed rats drank more water (HSD: 32.96±3.69 vs. CT: 23.54±2.1 mL/day) and exhibited marked diuresis (HSD: 16.33±1.78 vs. CT: 8.96±0.88 mL/day). C21 treatment did not affect water consumption and diuresis in rats fed with either NSD or HSD. Food consumption, body weight and changes in total kidney weight of all animal groups remained unchanged over 2-week study period (Table 1). No animals died during the study.
Table 1.
General and renal parameters of control and C21-treated obese rats fed with either normal (NSD) or high sodium diet (HSD).
| General parameters | CT | C21 | HSD | HSD+C21 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food consumed, g/day | 29.96±0.68 | 28.83±0.71 | 28.77±2.12 | 31.99±1.69 |
| Water consumed, mL/day | 23.54±2.10 | 26.54±2.16 | 32.96±3.69 | 29.58±3.44 |
| Total kidney weight, g | 3.24±0.13 | 3.16±0.06 | 3.14±0.11 | 3.00±0.07 |
| Plasma protein, mg/mL | 2.70±0.07 | 2.51±0.08 | 2.42±0.09 | 2.30±0.04 |
| Total body weight, g | 619.4±14.4 | 541.6±17.2 | 630.0±19.8 | 613.1±6.5 |
| Urine formation, mL/day | 8.96±0.88 | 11.58±1.55 | 16.33±1.78* | 16.75±1.87 |
| Urinary urea nitrogen (UN), mg/dL | 32.58±0.66 | 32.05±0.96 | 27.63±0.21* | 27.30±0.43 |
| Urinary creatinine (Cr), mg/dL | 20.47±2.41 | 15.81±1.08 | 7.83±0.34* | 9.12±0.62 |
| Plasma urea nitrogen (UN), mg/dL | 26.51 ±3.08 | 30.16±2.74 | 36.03±2.14* | 33.66±2.03 |
| Plasma creatinine (Cr), mg/dL | 3.69±0.26 | 3.44±0.59 | 5.98±0.44* | 4.83±0.80 |
| Plasma total nitrite, μmol/L | 23.67±1.75 | 21.00±2.16 | 15.35±0.49* | 22.08±2.16† |
significantly different from control obese rats;
significantly different from HSD-fed rats (HSD); Values are represented as mean±SEM; One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's Multiple Comparison Test, p<0.05; N=8 in each group. CT-obese control, C21-obese treated with C21, HSD-obese treated with HSD, HSD+C21-obese treated with C21 and HSD.
Indices of oxidative stress in vivo
HSD feeding significantly increased the activity of NADPH oxidase (NOX), a major superoxide radical anion (O2−•) producing enzyme (HSD: 0.37±0.07 vs. CT: 0.13±0.04 ΔRLU/μg protein/min), which was reduced by C21 in HSD-fed rats (HSD+C21: 0.11±0.04 ΔRLU/μg protein/min), but not in NSD-fed control rats (Fig. 1A). Renal activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), superoxide dismutating enzyme (Fig. 1B), and catalase (CAT), H2O2 metabolizing enzyme (Fig. 1C), remained unchanged. Mean plasma content of H2O2 (HSD: 323.80±25.85 vs. CT: 173.20±38.58 μM/mL) (Fig. 1D) and urinary excretion of H2O2 (HSD: 41.70±4.72 vs. CT: 23.01±2.13 μM/mg Cr (creatinine)) (Fig. 1E) were increased in HSD-fed rats. Co-treatment with C21 reduced urinary (HSD+C21: 30.51±3.00 μM/mg Cr), but not plasma content of H2O2 (HSD+C21: 328.80±22.31 μM/mL) in HSD-fed rats. Urinary excretion of 8-isoprostane was increased as well in HSD-fed rats (HSD: 7.90±1.65 pg/μg Cr), which was reduced by C21 treatment (HSD+C21: 4.12±1.01 pg/μg Cr) (Fig. 1F). Renal carbonyl content was also reduced by C21 treatment in HSD fed rats (HSD+C21: 5.47±1.42 vs. HSD: 10.51±0.92 μM/mg protein) (Fig. 1G). C21 did not affect carbonyl content in NSD fed obese rats.
Figure 1.
Oxidative stress indices such as activities of NADPH oxidase (A), SOD (B) and CAT (C), plasma H2O2 (D), urinary excretion of H2O2 (E) and 8-isoprostanes (F), and protein carbonyls (G) of control and C21-treated obese rats fed with either normal of high sodium diet for 14 days. Effect of C21-treatment on hyperosmolar salt (0.25 M NaCl)-induced superoxide formation in HK-2 cells (H). Values are represented as mean±SEM; One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's Multiple Comparison Test, p<0.05; CT-obese control, C21-obese treated with C21, HSD-obese treated with HSD, HSD+C21-obese treated with C21 and HSD.
Superoxide formation in vitro
To selectively isolate the effect of AT2R activation on NOX-mediated superoxide formation in absence of in vivo hemodynamic or renal changes, we have stimulated HK-2 cells with high salt (0.25 M NaCl, final) to generate superoxide formation (control treatment had 113 mM NaCl). Salt induced significant superoxide formation (∼12 fold compared to control) which was reduced by AT2R agonist C21 (1μM) (∼3 fold compared to salt). Pre-treatment with AT2R antagonist PD123319 (1μM) abolished C21-inhibition of salt-induced superoxide formation. In fact under normal salt condition, treatment with PD123319 increased superoxide formation (∼9 fold) (Fig. 1H).
Expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), phospho-eNOS (Ser1177) and 3-nitrotyrosine
In comparison to obese control rats, HSD fed rats show a decreased expression of eNOS (∼130 kDa) by ∼50%, which was not affected by C21 treatment (Fig. 2A). Phospho-eNOS remained statistically unchanged among treatment groups (Fig. 2B). Changes in renal expression of 3-nitrotyrosine were remained non-significant. Although, there was a trend of decrease in the expression of 3-nitrotyrosine due to HSD feeding (by ∼20%), which was further decreased by C21 in HSD-fed rats (by ∼20%) (Fig. 2C).
Figure 2.
Effect of C21-treatment on expression of (A) endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), (B) p-eNOS (Ser1177), and (C) 3-nitrotyrosine (a marker of nitrosative stress) in kidney of obese rats fed with either normal or high sodium diet for 14 days. Phospho-eNOS was quantitated by PathScan® sandwich ELISA. Values are represented as mean±SEM; One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's Multiple Comparison Test, p<0.05; CT-obese control, C21-obese treated with C21, HSD-obese treated with HSD, HSD+C21-obese treated with C21 and HSD.
Plasma nitrites
HSD feeding of obese rats significantly reduced plasma nitrites (HSD: 15.35±0.49 vs. CT: 23.67±1.75 μmol/L). This decrease in plasma nitrites was prevented by concurrent treatment with C21 (HSD+C21: 22.08±2.16 μmol/L) (Table 1).
Morphological assessment of kidney
Periodic acid-Schiff staining was performed to study renal structural changes (Fig. 3, Table 2). In NSD fed OZR: glomeruli were characterized by mild to moderate focal segmental hypercellularity, mesangial expansion, matrix deposition and thickening of basement membrane and narrowing of Bowman's space; tubules were characterized by mild increase in cellularity, moderate vacuolization, lipid deposition, narrowing of lumen, and sloughing of brush border and basement membranes; interstitium showed mild infiltration of immune cells. HSD feeding of obese rats accelerated such structural changes; in glomeruli, which extended to crescent formation, visceral epithelial cell hypertrophy in urinary space, focal segmental collapse of tuft, breaking of capillaries and loss of nephron elements; in tubules, it extended to dilatation, cast formation and atrophy; in interstitium, it extended to significant infiltration and fibrosis. Our findings are in agreement with other reports.31 C21 treatment significantly prevented these structural changes, albeit reduction of glomerular indices was higher than that of tubular (Table 2). Other improvements in tubular structural changes by C21 such as cast formation, lipid deposition and narrowing of tubular lumen, vacuolization, sloughing of brush border and basement membranes, visceral epithelial cell hypertrophy may have been insufficient to be detected by our semi-quantitative assessment.
Figure 3.
morphological assessments of periodic acid-Schiff (PAS)-stained kidney sections of obese rats treated with C21 and fed with either normal or high sodium diet for 14 days (A). Glomerular cellularity score (B), decrease in Bowman's space (C), Corpuscle occlusion score (D), Glomerulosclerosis score (E), interstitial infiltration score (F), Interstitial fibrosis score (G). B-G: values are represented as mean±SEM; One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's Multiple Comparison Test, p<0.05; CT-obese control, C21-obese treated with C21, HSD-obese treated with HSD, HSD+C21-obese treated with C21 and HSD. Original magnification, X40.
Table 2.
Qualitative assessment of glomerular, tubular and interstitial injury in C21-obese rats fed with either normal (NSD) or high sodium diet (HSD).
| Morphological changes | CT | C21 | HSD | HSD+C21 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glomerular changes | ||||
| Focal segmental cellularity and mesangial cell expansion | ++ | ++ | +++ | ++ |
| Thickening of basement membrane | ++ | ++ | +++ | ++ |
| Narrowing of Bowman's space | ++ | + | +++ | ++ |
| Crescent formation | + | + | ++ | + |
| Focal segmental collapse of glomerular tuft | + | - | ++ | + |
| Obliterated capillaries | + | - | ++ | + |
| Loss of nephron elements | + | - | ++ | + |
|
| ||||
| Tubular changes | ||||
| Cellularity | + | + | +++ | ++ |
| Dilatation | - | - | +++ | ++ |
| Atrophy | + | + | +++ | +++ |
| Lipid deposits | + | + | ++ | + |
| Cast formation and narrowing of lumen | + | + | ++ | ++ |
| Vacuolization | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ |
| Sloughing of brush border and basement membrane | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ |
| Visceral epithelial cell hypertrophy in urinary space | + | - | ++ | ++ |
|
| ||||
| Interstitial changes | ||||
| Infiltration | + | + | +++ | ++ |
| Fibrosis | + | + | ++ | + |
Note: Several morphological indices were highlighted as bar graph in Fig. 4. Intensity was graded as mild (+), moderate (++) and severe (+++).
Indices of renal function
HSD feeding caused a significant decrease in urinary excretion of Cr (HSD: 7.83±0.34 vs. CT: 20.47±2.41 mg/dL) and urea nitrogen (UN) (HSD: 27.63±0.21 vs. CT: 32.58±0.66) (Table 1), which were not affected by C21 co-treatment. These HSD-related urinary changes were associated with elevated plasma levels of Cr (HSD: 5.98±0.44 vs. CT: 3.69±0.26 mg/dL) and UN (HSD: 36.03±2.14 vs. CT: 26.51±3.08 mg/dL) in HSD-fed rats (Table 1), which were also not reduced with C21 treatment. Based on plasma and urinary values of Cr and UN, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated (Fig. 4A). HSD feeding significantly reduced GFR (HSD: 15.15±2.3 vs. CT: 43.50±9.90 μL/min), which was improved with C21 treatment (HSD+C21: 27.43±4.91 μL/min), albeit at non-significant extent compared either with HSD or CT. HSD feeding significantly decreased urine-to-plasma Cr (UPcr) (HSD: 1.37±0.14 vs. CT: 5.80±0.89) (Fig. 4B), and increased FEUN values (HSD: 60.45±5.83 vs. CT: 26.08±3.68) (Fig. 4C). C21-treatment increased UPcr (HSD+C21: 2.32±0.40) and decreased FEUN (HSD+C21: 46.05±9.30), albeit at non-significant extent. Surprisingly, HSD intake did not alter plasma UN-to-Cr in obese rats (HSD: 6.17±0.40 vs. CT: 7.31±0.92). C21 treatment increased plasma UN-to-Cr values in obese rats fed either NSD (C21: 11.16±2.19) or HSD (HSD+C21: 8.66±1.74) (Fig. 4D). FEpro was increased by HSD intake (HSD: 0.18±0.02 vs. CT: 0.12±0.02 μg/min) (Fig. 5A), while FEalb remained unchanged (Fig. 5B). C21 was able to reduce significantly, both, FEpro (HSD+C21: 0.11±0.02 μg/min) and FEalb (HSD+C21: 0.08±0.01 μg/min) in HSD fed rats. HSD feeding of obese rats showed a significant increase in uPcr (HSD: 36±1.63 vs. CT: 17±1.14) (Fig. 5C), but did not affect uAcr (Fig. 5D). C21 treatment of HSD-fed rats decreased both, uPcr (HSD+C21: 29±1.56) and uAcr (HSD+C21: 22±2.47). Similarly, albumin-to-total protein ratio (uAPr) was also decreased in urine of HSD fed rats (HSD: 89±15 vs. CT: 268±55%), which was not affected by C21 (Fig. 5E). Intake of HSD resulted in tubular damage and leakage of NAG in urine. NAG activity was significantly increased in urine of HSD-fed rats compared to NSD controls (HSD: 3.32±0.31 vs. CT: 2.22±0.24 RFU/30 min/μg Cr). Treatment of HSD-fed rats with AT2R agonist C21 reduced tubular damage and urinary NAG activity (HSD+C21: 2.46±0.13 RFU/30 min/μg Cr) (Fig. 5F). Dot blot analysis of kidney homogenate of HSD fed rats showed significantly reduced expression of protein recycling receptors, cubilin (HSD: 0.77±0.16 vs. CT: 1.27±0.14) (Fig. 5G) and megalin (HSD: 0.25±0.02 vs. CT: 0.47±0.07) (Fig. 5H); C21 had no further effects on the expression of these proteins.
Figure 4.
Effect of C21-treatment on indices of renal function of obese rats fed with either normal or high sodium diet for 14 days: estimated GFR (A), urine-to-plasma creatinine ratio (UPcr) (B), fractional excretion of urea nitrogen (FEUN) (C), plasma urea nitrogen-to-creatinine ratio (UN-to-Cr) (D). (A) Values are represented as mean±SEM; (B-D) individual values are represented as scattered plot along with their respective mean. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's Multiple Comparison Test, p<0.05; CT-obese control, C21-obese treated with C21, HSD-obese treated with HSD, HSD+C21-obese treated with C21 and HSD. ΦStatistically significant at n=12, 95% CI, 10% beta error.
Figure 5.
Effect of C21-treatment on urinary fractional excretion of protein (FEpro) (A), fractional excretion of albumin (FEalb) (B), protein-to-creatinine (uPcr) (C), albumin-to-creatinine (uAcr) (D), albumin-to-total protein (uAPr, percent) (E), activity of NAG, Nacetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase, a lysosomal enzyme and a marker of tubular damage (F) and expression of protein recycling receptors cubilin (G) and megalin (H) in kidney of obese rats fed with either normal or high sodium diet for 14 days. G-H: Immune-reactivity was normalized against amido black. Values are represented as mean±SEM; One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's Multiple Comparison Test, p<0.05; CT-obese control, C21-obese treated with C21, HSD-obese treated with HSD, HSD+C21-obese treated with C21 and HSD. ΦStatistically significant at n=12, 99% CI, 10% beta error.
Qualitative assessment of all biochemical indices is summarized in Table 3.
Table 3.
Summary of effects of HSD or C21 during HSD feeding in OZR.
| Indices | CT vs. HSD | HSD vs. HSD+C21 |
|---|---|---|
| Food consumption | ↔ | ↔ |
| Water consumption | ↔ | ↔ |
| Total kidney weight | ↔ | ↔ |
| Total body weight | ↔ | ↔ |
| Urinary indices | ||
| Urine formation | ↑ | ↔ |
| Urea nitrogen | ↓ | ↔ |
| Creatinine | ↓ | ↔ |
| Fractional excretion of protein | ↑ | ↓ |
| Fractional excretion of albumin | ↔ | ↓ |
| H2O2 excretion | ↑ | ↓ |
| 8-isoprostane excretion | ↑ | ↓ |
| N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase activity | ↑ | ↓ |
| Protein-to-creatinine | ↑ | ↓ |
| Albumin-to-creatinine | ↔ | ↓ |
| Albumin-to-total protein, percent | ↓ | ↔ |
| Plasma indices | ||
| Protein | ↔ | ↔ |
| Urea nitrogen | ↑ | ↔ |
| Creatinine | ↑ | ↔ |
| Nitrite | ↓ | ↑ |
| H2O2 | ↑ | ↔ |
| Renal cortical indices | ||
| eNOS expression | ↓ | ↔ |
| Phosphor-eNOS (Ser1177) | ↓ | ↔ |
| 3-nitrotyrosine expression | ↔ | ↔ |
| NADPH oxidase activity | ↑ | ↓ |
| Superoxide dismutase activity | ↔ | ↔ |
| Catalase activity | ↔ | ↔ |
| Protein carbonyls | ↔ | ↓ |
| Cubilin expression | ↓ | ↔ |
| Megalin expression | ↓ | ↔ |
| Estimated glomerular filtration rate | ↓ | ↔ |
| Urine-to-plasma creatinine | ↓ | ↔ |
| Fractional excretion of urea nitrogen | ↑ | ↔ |
| Plasma urea nitrogen-to-creatinine | ↔ | ↔ |
Discussion
A novel and significant contribution of our study is to demonstrate that AT2R activation exerts anti-oxidative effects and preserve kidney structure and function under HSD feeding in obese rats. This finding is supported by reduced renal NOX activity, urinary excretion of H2O2, 8-isoprostanes and renal protein carbonyls in AT2R selective agonist C21 treated HSD fed rats. Interestingly, C21 was unable to lower plasma content of H2O2 which indicates renal specific effects of AT2R agonist treatment. Unlike our previous report,5 we did not observe C21-mediated diuretic and reduced body weight gain effect in HSD fed OZR. This may have been due to different route of C21 administration i.e., oral bolus earlier vs. osmotic pump continuous delivery in the present study.
One of the mechanisms by which chronic salt intake in obesity causes formation of superoxide is activation of the renal RAS component, Ang-II-AT1R leading to NOX activation and oxidative stress. Our study show that the HSD-induced increase in superoxide and oxidative stress are due to increased NOX activity, a major superoxide generating enzyme and not due to superoxide catabolizing enzymes, SOD and CAT, which were not altered by HSD intake in obese rat kidneys. These findings are consistent with earlier studies.32 Superoxide can directly influence tubular reabsorption of sodium33,34 in setting of hypertension5 and renal injury in obese rats as seen in the present study and in Dahl S (salt-sensitive) rats.35 The AT2R agonist C21 treatment has shown to reduce renal Ang-II,5 expression of p47phox – NOX subunit,36 superoxide formation37 and salt-sensitive rise in blood pressure.5 Since Ang-II via AT1R38,39 and high blood pressure40 are potent stimuli to cause oxidative stress, it is likely that a reduction in renal Ang-II levels and blood pressure in response to C21,5 contributed to the antioxidative properties of the AT2R in these animals. On the other hand, our in vitro study performed in HK-2 cells and another in vivo study28 provide evidence suggesting that AT2R activation may have a direct role in reducing oxidative stress. However, present in vivo study does not allow us to conclude whether C21 actually reduced oxidative stress independent of the changes in blood pressure in obese animals. A separate study is warranted to delineate AT2R-linked anti-oxidative stress activity from hypertension and Ang-II in salt-induced renal injury in obese rats.
Our study does not support the role of nitrosative stress in HSD-related renal pathologies in obesity. OZR have reduced expression and activity of NOS and bioavailability of nitric oxide.41 HSD intake further reduced eNOS expression and induced superoxide formation.42 If increase in expression/activity of NOS is involved per se, we would expect a change in renal 3-NT during HSD intake because HSD intake increases superoxide formation. However, 3-NT remained unchanged; therefore in such conditions, we do not expect peroxynitrite and nitrosative stress to rise. This notion is supported by our results of reduced expression of renal eNOS and plasma nitrites and unchanged renal 3-nitrotyrosine in HSD fed obese rats. C21 did not prevent reductions of eNOS or p-eNOS, but preserved plasma nitrites in obese rats fed HSD, and this effect may be owed to reduction of NOX activity, superoxide formation and oxidative stress indices.
Obese Zucker rats exhibit modest monocyte-macrophage infiltration, glomerular hypertrophy, mesangial matrix expansion and basement membrane thickening as early as 7-8 week of age, which is resolvable by AT2R agonist C21.43 At this age, animals do not show membranoproliferative FSGS, tubular fibrosis or proteinuria. Older OZRs (12-14 week of age) exhibit mild FSGS and fibrosis and decline in GFR at 30 week of age.43 OZR in our study at 12-14 week of age showed morphological changes which remained statistically unchanged by C21 treatment. This discrepancy observed with C21 treatment in our earlier43 and present study may be due to age of OZR (7-8 week vs. 12-14 week). Present study data suggest that HSD intake caused an interstitial infiltration and hastened tubulointerstitial fibrosis secondary to FSGS and reduced GFR. Similar changes also have been observed in HSD fed Dahl salt-sensitive44 and obese SHR rats.45 Thus, immune cell infiltration and fibrosis may represent a nonspecific response to HSD intake, which can plausibly contribute to kidney damage, for example by augmenting oxidative stress.42,46 Our recent studies, both in vivo and in vitro, indicated that AT2R activation with C21 exert anti-inflammatory response via altering cytokine profiles of renal epithelial cells and macrophages.23,43 Consistent with those findings,23,43 in the present study, AT2R activation by C21 significantly reduced interstitial infiltration of immune cells in HSD fed OZR and in turn may have been a reason for reduced tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Anti-inflammatory properties of AT2R activation are dependent on activation of phosphatases47 and decreased NF- B responses as well.48 It is likely that C21-mediated reduction of fibrotic injury may involve reduced expression of inflammatory and fibrotic mediators49-52 or decrease in tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (MMP), resulting in increased MMP activity, as seen in diabetic ApoE-/- mouse model.36
Kidney damage was also assessed by functional changes. NSD fed OZR exhibited primarily glomerular proteinuria, uAcr>uPcr, which might have originated from glomerular leakage, defective retrieval of tubular protein or both. HSD intake caused additional tubular proteinuria without an increase in albuminuria as determined by decreased uAPr in HSD fed OZR in current study and Dahl S rats.46 HSD-induced tubular proteinuria may have been due to (a) altered retrieval of excess filtered albumin by endocytosis as demonstrated by loss of megalin-cubilin and/or (b) abnormal protein degradation by lysosomes and urine proteases,53 which return non-immunoreactive peptide fragments of albumin to tubular lumen for excretion that remained undetected by antibodies specific to intact albumin.54,55 Other tubular protein retrieval mechanisms exist,56 but how exactly HSD intake in obesity affects these mechanisms is not known. AT2R agonist C21 reduced proteinuric indices independent of protein recycling receptors (megalin-cubilin), which suggest that C21 improved either glomerular protein permeability or lysosomal degradation of protein, and thus reduced secretion of nephritic proteins into the tubular lumen. This finding is in accordance with that of Gelosa et al50 who have shown that C21 (10 mg/kg/day, for 7 week) treatment significantly delayed the time of proteinuria development in stroke-prone SHR. This conclusion is further supported by reduced urinary marker of tubular lysosomal dysfunction (NAG activity) in C21-treated HSD-fed rats.
Despite resolved microscopic changes in AT2R agonist C21 treated HSD fed OZR, improvements in uAcr and eGFR did not achieve statistical significance. This may have been due to methodology. Light microscopy is a semi-quantitative method while PRM method of urinary protein estimation and eGFR are quantitative. Proteinuria itself is a variable index of renal damage and is neither always correlated with renal structural changes38,57 nor it predicts renal pathology and progression. The difference in uAcr between HSD and HSD+C21 has 91.1% statistical power. Similarly, it should be noted that eGFR of C21-treated rats was neither statistically different from control nor HSD fed rats. We calculated statistical power of 77.3% to assess any significant difference in eGFR between HSD and HSD+C21 group. C21 would show improvement in eGFR and reduction in uAcr, perhaps with higher sample size (for eGFR, n=12, beta error level 10%, 95% CI; for uAcr, n=9, beta error level 10%, 99% CI) or longer treatments. As established earlier58-60 and seen clinically,61-63 HSD-induced decline in GFR occurred in parallel with decreasing urinary concentrating ability as demonstrated by significantly reduced UPcr and elevated FEUN in HSD fed OZR, which were appeared to be not significantly improved by C21 treatment (Fig. 4). This may have been due to wide range of values that are possible for abnormal concentration of UN and Cr in plasma and urine.61 Overall, the present study provides evidence suggesting that AT2R activation with C21 exerts reno-protection during high salt intake in obesity.
Perspectives
Progression of salt-induced proteinuric renal injury occurs via oxidative stress and inflammation, as major pathways that subsequently form a vicious cycle for CKD leading to a faster decline of GFR in obesity. Clinically angiotensin converting enzyme-1 (ACE) inhibitor (ACEi)64,65 or AT1R blockers66,67 help control such pathologies, but they are inconsistent. Our series of experiment highlights AT2R stimulation as a therapeutic avenue in managing salt-induced oxidative pathologies, especially in obesity where AT2R are upregulated.20 More importantly, we show direct evidence that AT2R can preserve indices of kidney injury, via protecting plasma nitrites by reducing oxidative stress and limit exposure of nephritic proteins in the tubular lumen by preserving glomerular integrity, tubular protein recycling or lysosomal processing. AT2R agonist can be considered as potentially promising therapy for protecting kidney structure and function in obesity. However, further studies are needed to arrive on more definite conclusion regarding the use of the AT2R agonists as a therapeutic target.
Supplementary Material
Novelty and Significance.
What is New?
Selective activation of AT2R by C21 is renoprotective during high sodium intake in obesity.
AT2R agonist C21 reduces exposure of nephrotic proteins to tubular lumen and preserves renal structure and function in HSD fed obese rats.
Superoxide is known to scavenge nitrites with formation of toxic peroxynitrite. AT2R agonist C21 reduces NOX activity and thereby reduces superoxide formation and thus preserves plasma nitrites.
What is Relevant?
Obesity, excessive sodium intake and renal dysfunction are highly implicated in the pathogenesis of hypertension.
AT2R activation by C21 during HSD feeding is renoprotective plausibly by reducing oxidative stress which in turn will have an impact on blood pressure control in obesity.
Summary
Our study demonstrates that AT2R agonist treatment protects against HSD-induced glomerular and tubular damage and preserves kidney function in obesity; these changes in the kidney structure and function are associated with reduced oxidative stress. Moreover, in vitro and vivo studies suggest that AT2R activation reduces NOX activity and thereby reduces superoxide formation and preserves plasma nitrites, which all act in concert to reduce salt-induced kidney injury in obese rats.
Acknowledgments
Sources of Funding: This study was supported by NIH R01grant DK61578.
Footnotes
Disclosures: None
References
- 1.Hall JE, Guyton AC, Brands MW. Pressure-volume regulation in hypertension. Kidney Int Suppl. 1996;55:S35–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Reisin E. Sodium and obesity in the pathogenesis of hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1990;3:164–167. doi: 10.1093/ajh/3.2.164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rahmouni K, Correia ML, Haynes WG, Mark AL. Obesity-associated hypertension: new insights into mechanisms. Hypertension. 2005;45:9–14. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000151325.83008.b4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wu MT, Lam KK, Lee WC, Hsu KT, Wu CH, Cheng BC, Ng HY, Chi PJ, Lee YT, Lee CT. Albuminuria, proteinuria, and urinary albumin to protein ratio in chronic kidney disease. J Clin Lab Anal. 2012;26:82–92. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ali Q, Patel SN, Hussain T. Angiotensin AT2 receptor agonist prevents salt-sensitive hypertension in obese Zucker rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2015;308:F1379–F1385. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00002.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Teschner M, Paczek L, Schaefer R, Heidland A. Obese zucker rat: Potential role of intraglomerular proteolytic enzymes in the development of glomerulosclerosis. Res Exp Med. 1991;191:129–135. doi: 10.1007/BF02576668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Samuel P, Ali Q, Sabuhi R, Wu Y, Hussain T. High Na intake increases renal angiotensin II levels and reduces expression of the ACE2-AT2R-MasR axis in obese Zucker rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2012;303:F412–F419. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00097.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lavaud S, Michel O, Sassy-Prigent C, Heudes D, Bazin R, Bariety J, Chevalier J. Early influx of glomerular macrophages precedes glomerulosclerosis in the obese Zucker rat model. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996;7:2604–2615. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V7122604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wolf GG. Novel aspects of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system. Front Biosci. 2008;13:4993–5005. doi: 10.2741/3058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wolf G, Ziyadeh FN. The role of angiotensin II in diabetic nephropathy: Emphasis on non-hemodynamic mechanisms. Kidney Int. 1997;29:153–163. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(97)90023-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Poirier B, Lannaud-Bournoville M, Conti M, Bazin R, Michel O, Bariety J, Chevalier J, Myara I. Oxidative stress ocurs in absence of hyperglycemia and inflammation in the onset of kidney lesions in normotensive oebse rats. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000;15:467–476. doi: 10.1093/ndt/15.4.467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Reckelhoff JF, Romero JC. Role of oxidative stress in angiotensin-induced hypertension. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2003;284:R893–R912. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00491.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mori T, Allen W, Cowley J. Angiotensin II–NAD(P)H oxidase–stimulated superoxide modifies tubulovascular nitric oxide cross-talk in renal outer medulla. Hypertension. 2003;42:588–593. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000091821.39824.09. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ohisa N, Yoshida K, Matsuki R, Suzuki H, Miura H, Ohisa Y, Murayama N, Kaku M, Sato H. A comparison of urinary albumin–total protein ratio to phase-contrast microscopic examination of urine sediment for differentiating glomerular and nonglomerular bleeding. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;52:235–241. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Park EY, Kim TY. Fractional excretion of protein may be a useful predictor of decline of renal function in pan-chronic kidney diseases. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26:1746–1756. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.McQuarrie EP, Shakerdi L, Jardine AG, Fox JG, Mackinnon B. Fractional excretions of albumin and IgG are the best predictors of progression in primary glomerulonephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26:1563–1569. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Birmingham DJ, Rovin BH, Shidham G, Bissell M, Nagaraja HN, Hebert LA. Relationship between albuminuria and total proteinuria in systemic lupus erythematosus nephritis: Diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:1028–1033. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04761107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Samarawickrama A, Cai M, Smith E, Nambiar K, Sabin C, Fisher Gilleece, Holt S. Simultaneous measurement of urinary albumin and total protein may facilitate decision-making in HIV-infected patients with proteinuria. HIV Med. 2012;13:526–532. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2012.01003.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Smith ER, Cai MM, McMahon LP, Wright DA, Holt SG. The value of simultaneous measurements of urinary albumin and total protein in proteinuric patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:1534–1541. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hakam AC, Hussain T. Renal angiotensin II type-2 receptors are upregulated and mediate the candesartan-induced natriuresis/diuresis in obese Zucker rats. Hypertension. 2005;45:270–275. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000151622.47814.6f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hakam AC, Siddiqui AH, Hussain T. Renal angiotensin II AT2 receptors promote natriuresis in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006;290:F503–508. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00092.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Namsolleck P, Recarti C, Foulquier S, Steckelings UM, Unger T. AT(2) receptor and tissue injury: therapeutic implications. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2014;16:416. doi: 10.1007/s11906-013-0416-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dhande I, Ma W, Hussain T. Angiotensin AT2 receptor stimulation is anti-inflammatory in lipopolysaccharide-activated THP-1 macrophages via increased interleukin-10 production. Hypertens Res. 2015;38:21–29. doi: 10.1038/hr.2014.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rehman A, Leibowitz A, Yamamoto N, Rautureau Y, Paradis P, Schiffrin EL. Angiotensin type 2 receptor agonist compound 21 reduces vascular injury and myocardial fibrosis in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 2012;59:291–299. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.180158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nasser M, Clere N, Botelle L, Javellaud J, Oudart N, Faure S, Achard JM. Opposite effects of angiotensins receptors type 2 and type 4 on streptozotocin induced diabetes vascular alterations in mice. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014;13:40. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-13-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sohn HY, Raff U, Hoffmann A, Gloe T, Heermeier K, Galle J, Pohl U. Differential role of angiotensin II receptor subtypes on endothelial superoxide formation. Br J Pharmacol. 2000;131:667–672. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang G, Coleman CG, Glass MJ, Zhou P, Yu Q, Park L, Anrather J, Pickel VM, Iadecola C. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor-coupled nitric oxide production modulates free radical availability and voltage-gated Ca2++ currents in NTS neurons. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2012;302:R1076–R1083. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00571.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chabrashvili T, Kitiyakara C, Blau J, Karber A, Aslam S, Welch WJ, Wilcox CS. Effects of ANG II type 1 and 2 receptors on oxidative stress, renal NADPH oxidase, and SOD expression. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2003;285:R117–R124. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00476.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lu J, Wu L, Jiang T, Wang Y, Zhao H, Gao Q, Pan Y, Tian Y, Zhang Y. Angiotensin AT2 receptor stimulation inhibits activation of NADPH oxidase and ameliorates oxidative stress in rotenone model of Parkinson's disease in CATH.a cells. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2015;47:16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2014.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Min LJ, Mogi M, Tsukuda K, Jing F, Ohshima K, Nakaoka H, Kan-No H, Wang XL, Chisaka T, Bai HY, Iwanami J, Horiuchi M. Direct stimulation of angiotensin II type 2 receptor initiated after stroke ameliorates ischemic brain damage. Am J Hypertens. 2014;27:1036–1044. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpu015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Coimbra T, Janssen U, Gröne HJ, Ostendorf T, Kunter U, Schmidt H, Brabant G, Floege J. Early events leading to renal injury in obese Zucker (fatty) rats with type II diabetes. Kidney Int. 2000;57:167–182. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00836.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Johns EJ, O'Shaughnessy B, O'Neill S, Lane B, Healy V. Impact of elevated dietary sodium intake on NAD(P)H oxidase and SOD in the cortex and medulla of the rat kidney. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2010;299:R234–R240. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00541.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liang M, Berndt TJ, Knox FG. Mechanism underlying diuretic effect of L-NAME at a subpressure dose. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2001;281:F414–F419. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.2001.281.3.F414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ortiz PA, Garvin JL. Interaction of O2•− and NO• in the Thick Ascending Limb. Hypertension. 2002;39:591–596. doi: 10.1161/hy0202.103287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Meng S, Cason GW, Gannon AW, Racusen LC, Manning RD., Jr Oxidative stress in Dahl salt-sensitive hypertension. Hypertension. 2003;41:1346–1352. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000070028.99408.E8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Koulis C, Chow BS, McKelvey M, Steckelings UM, Unger T, Thallas-Bonke V, Thomas MC, Cooper ME, Jandeleit-Dahm KA, Allen TJ. AT2R agonist, compound 21, is reno-protective against type 1 diabetic nephropathy. Hypertension. 2015;65:1073–1081. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.05204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shao C, Yu L, Gao L. Activation of angiotensin type 2 receptors partially ameliorates streptozotocin-induced diabetes in male rats by islet protection. Endocrinology. 2014;155:793–804. doi: 10.1210/en.2013-1601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lombardi D, Gordon KL, Polinsky P, Shinichi Suga, Schwartz SM, Johnson RJ. Salt-sensitive hypertension develops after short-term exposure to angiotensin II. Hypertension. 1999;33:1013–1019. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.33.4.1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Vaziri ND, Bai Y, Ni Z, Quiroz Y, Pandian R, Rodriguez-Iturbe B. Intra-renal angiotensin II/AT1 receptor, oxidative stress, inflammation, and progressive injury in renal mass reduction. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007;323:85–93. doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.123638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Seifi B, Kadkhodaee M, Karimian SM, Zahmatkesh M, Xu J, Soleimani M. Evaluation of renal oxidative stress in the development of DOCA-salt induced hypertension and its renal damage. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2010;32:90–97. doi: 10.3109/10641960902993111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Li Z, Rodriguez-Iturbe B, Ni Z, Shahkarami A, Sepassi L, Vaziri ND. Effect of hereditary obesity on renal expressions of NO synthase, caveolin-1, Akt, guanylate cyclase, and calmodulin. Kidney Int. 2005;68:2766–2772. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00747.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Alvarez V, Quiroz Y, Nava M, Pons H, Rodriguez-Iturbe B. Overload proteinuria is followed by salt-sensitive hypertension caused by renal infiltration of immune cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2002;283:F1132–F1141. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00199.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dhande I, Ali Q, Hussain T. Proximal tubule angiotensin AT2 receptors mediate an anti-inflammatory response via interleukin-10: role in renoprotection in obese rats. Hypertension. 2013;61:1218–1226. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.00422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Raij L, Azar S, Keane W. Mesangial immune injury, hypertension, and progressive glomerular damage in Dahi rats. Kidney Int. 1984;26:137–143. doi: 10.1038/ki.1984.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nagase M, Matsui H, Shibata S, Gotoda T, Fujita T. Salt-induced nephropathy in obese spontaneously hypertensive rats via paradoxical activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor: role of oxidative stress. Hypertension. 2007;50:877–883. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.091058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Fujii S, Zhang L, Kosaka H. Albuminuria, expression of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in the renal tubules of hypertensive dahl salt-sensitive rats. Hypertens Res. 2007;30:991–998. doi: 10.1291/hypres.30.991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Matsubara H. Pathophysiological Role of Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor in Cardiovascular and Renal Diseases. Circ Res. 1998;83:1182–1191. doi: 10.1161/01.res.83.12.1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wu L, Iwai M, Li Z, Shiuchi T, Min LJ, Cui TX, Li JM, Okumura M, Nahmias C, Horiuchi M. Regulation of inhibitory protein-kappaB and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 by angiotensin II type 2 receptor-activated Src homology protein tyrosine phosphatase-1 in fetal vascular smooth muscle cells. Mol Endocrinol. 2004;18:666–678. doi: 10.1210/me.2003-0053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kaschina E, Grzesiak A, Li J, Foryst-Ludwig A, Timm M, Rompe F, Sommerfeld M, Kemnitz UR, Curato C, Namsolleck P, Tschope C, Hallberg A, Alterman M, Hucko T, Paetsch I, Dietrich T, Schnackenburg B, Graf K, Dahlof B, Kintscher U, Unger T, Steckelings UM. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor stimulation: a novel option of therapeutic interference with the renin-angiotensin system in myocardial infarction? Circulation. 2008;118:2523–2532. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.784868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gelosa P, Pignieri A, Fandriks L, de Gasparo M, Hallberg A, Banfi C, Castiglioni L, Turolo L, Guerrini U, Tremoli E, Sironi L. Stimulation of AT2 receptor exerts beneficial effects in stroke-prone rats: focus on renal damage. J Hypertens. 2009;27:2444–2451. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283311ba1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Rompe F, Artuc M, Hallberg A, Alterman M, Stroder K, Thone-Reineke C, Reichenbach A, Schacherl J, Dahlof B, Bader M, Alenina N, Schwaninger M, Zuberbier T, Funke-Kaiser H, Schmidt C, Schunck WH, Unger T, Steckelings UM. Direct angiotensin II type 2 receptor stimulation acts anti-inflammatory through epoxyeicosatrienoic acid and inhibition of nuclear factor kappaB. Hypertension. 2010;55:924–931. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.147843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Matavelli LC, Huang J, Siragy HM. Angiotensin AT(2) receptor stimulation inhibits early renal inflammation in renovascular hypertension. Hypertension. 2011;57:308–313. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.164202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kania K, Byrnes EA, Beilby JP, Webb SA, Strong KJ. Urinary proteases degrade albumin: implications for measurement of albuminuria in stored samples. Ann Clin Biochem. 2010;47:151–157. doi: 10.1258/acb.2009.009247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Burne MJ, Osicka TM, Comper WD. Pathophysiological role of angiotensin II type 2 receptor in cardiovascular and renal diseases. Kidney Int. 1999;55:261–270. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00234.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Burne MJ, Panagiotopoulos S, Jerums G, Comper WD. Alterations in renal degradation of albumin in early experimental diabetes in the rat: a new factor in the mechanism of albuminuria. Clin Sci. 1998;95:67–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Dickson LE, Wagner MC, Sandoval RM, Molitoris BA. The proximal tubule and albuminuria: really! J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25:443–453. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013090950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Fioretto P, Stehouwer CDA, Mauer M, Chiesura-Corona M, Brocco E, Carraro A, Bortoloso E, Hinsbergh VWMv, Crepaldi G, Nosadini G. Heterogeneous nature of microalbuminuria in NIDDM: studies of endothelial function and renal structure. Diabetologia. 1998;41:233–236. doi: 10.1007/s001250050895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Arkin A, Popper H. Urea reabsorption and relation between creatinine and urea clearance in renal disease. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1940;65:627–637. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Perrone RD, Madias NE, Levey AS. Serum creatinine as an index of renal function -new insights into old concepts. Clin Chem. 1992;38:1933–1953. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bankir L, Ahloulay M, Bouby N, Trinh-Trang-Tan MM, Machet F, Lacour B, Jungers P. Is the process of urinary urea concentration responsible for a high glomerular filtration rate? J Am Soc Nephrol. 1993;4:1091–1103. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V451091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Morgan DB, Carver ME, Payne RB. Plasma creatinine and urea: creatinine ratio in patients with raised plasma urea. Br Med J. 1977;2:929–932. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6092.929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Carvounis CP, Nisar S, Guro-Razuman S. Significance of the fractional excretion of urea in the differential diagnosis of acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 2002;62:2223–2229. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00683.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative w. Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care. 2004;8:R204–212. doi: 10.1186/cc2872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.O'Donnell MP, Kasiske B, Katz S, Schmitz P, Keane W. Locastatin but not enalapril reduces glomerular injury in Dahl salt-sensitive rats. Hypertension. 1992;20:651–658. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.20.5.651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Laverman GD, Goor HV, Henning RH, Jong PED, Zeeuw DD, Navis G. Renoprotective effects of VPI versus ACEI in normotensive nephrotic rats on different sodium intakes. Kidney Int. 2003;63:64–71. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00708.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Weber M, Brunner HR, Ekman S, Hansson L, Hua T, Laragh J, McInnes GT, Mitchell L, Plat F, Schork A, Smith B, Zanchetti A. Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial. The Lancet. 2004;363:2022–2031. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16451-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lithell H, Hansson L, Skoog I, Elmfeldt D, Hofman A, Olofsson B, Trenkwalder P, Zanchetti A. The Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE): principal results of a randomized double-blind intervention trial. J Hypertens. 2003;21:875–886. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200305000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





