Skip to main content
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1978 May;40(5):489–493. doi: 10.1136/hrt.40.5.489

Left coronary artery anatomy in patients with bicuspid aortic valves.

A D Johnson, J H Detwiler, C B Higgins
PMCID: PMC483433  PMID: 656213

Abstract

The anatomy of the proximal left coronary artery in 33 adult patients with bicuspid aortic valves was compared with that in 33 adult patients with aortic valve disease of other aetiologies and with that in 50 adult control patients with no valve or congenital heart disease. Patients with bicuspid aortic valves had a higher incidence of immediate bifurcation of the left main coronary artery, of left main coronary length less than 10 mm, and of left coronary artery dominance. The mean length of the left main coronary artery was significantly less in the patients with bicuspid aortic valves. These variations from the usual coronary artery anatomy may be part of the developmental abnormalities responsible for bicuspid aortic valves, and require evaluation and consideration when considering angiography and valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis.

Full text

PDF
489

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Becker A. E., Becker M. J., Edwards J. E. Anomalies associated with coarctation of aorta: particular reference to infancy. Circulation. 1970 Jun;41(6):1067–1075. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.41.6.1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fox C., Davies M. J., Webb-Peploe M. M. Length of left main coronary artery. Br Heart J. 1973 Aug;35(8):796–798. doi: 10.1136/hrt.35.8.796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Furlong M. B., Jr, Gardner T. J., Gott V. L., Hutchins G. M. Myocardial infarction complicating coronary perfusion during open-heart surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1972 Feb;63(2):185–192. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Green G. E., Bernstein S., Reppert E. H. The length of the left main coronary artery. Surgery. 1967 Dec;62(6):1021–1024. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Higgins C. B., Wexler L. Reversal of dominance of the coronary arterial system in isolated aortic stenosis and bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation. 1975 Aug;52(2):292–296. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.52.2.292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kronzon I., Deutsch P., Glassman E. Length of the left main coronary artery: its relation to the pattern of coronary arterial distribution. Am J Cardiol. 1974 Dec;34(7):787–789. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(74)90697-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lewis C. M., Dagenais G. R., Friesinger G. C., Ross R. S. Coronary arteriographic appearances in patients with left bundle-branch block. Circulation. 1970 Feb;41(2):299–307. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.41.2.299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rosenquist G. C. Congenital mitral valve disease associated with coarctation of the aorta: a spectrum that includes parachute deformity of the mitral valve. Circulation. 1974 May;49(5):985–993. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.49.5.985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. SPENCER F. C., NEILL C. A., SANK L., BAHNSON H. T. Anatomical variations in 46 patients with congenital aortic stenosis. Am Surg. 1960 Apr;26:204–216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Simon A. L., Reis R. L. The angiographic features of bicuspid and unicommissural aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1971 Sep;28(3):353–358. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(71)90127-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Spencer F. C., Malette W. Technical considerations of coronary perfusion during aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1968 Nov-Dec;9(6):562–572. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES