Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Apr 18;6:24128. doi: 10.1038/srep24128

Hydrothermal synthesis of NiWO4 crystals for high performance non-enzymatic glucose biosensors

Sivakumar Mani 1, Veeramani Vediyappan 1, Shen-Ming Chen 1,a, Rajesh Madhu 1, Veerakumar Pitchaimani 2, Jia-Yaw Chang 3, Shang-Bin Liu 2,4,b
PMCID: PMC4834566  PMID: 27087561

Abstract

A facile hydrothermal route for the synthesis of ordered NiWO4 nanocrystals, which show promising applications as high performance non-enzymatic glucose sensor is reported. The NiWO4-modified electrodes showed excellent sensitivity (269.6 μA mM−1 cm−2) and low detection limit (0.18 μM) for detection of glucose with desirable selectivity, stability, and tolerance to interference, rendering their prospective applications as cost-effective, enzyme-free glucose sensors.

It is well-known that an abnormal level of glucose in human blood may cause metabolic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, endocrine metabolic disorder, eye defect, and cardiovascular diseases. As such, the detection of glucose plays a vital role in various applications such as biotechnology, bio-processing, clinical research, and food industry1,2,3. Likewise, research and development on high-performance glucose biosensors with desirable sensitivity and selectivity is an imperative task. Among various methods available for electrochemical detections of glucose, they are commonly catalogued by either enzymatic or non-enzymatic biosensors. The more conventional glucose biosensors were mostly fabricated based on glucose oxidase (GOx) enzymes, which catalyzes the oxidation of glucose (Glu) to hydrogen peroxide and D-glucono-δ-lactone (GDL), also known as gluconolactone. However, although these enzyme based biosensors exhibit highly sensitive performance, their universal application is limited and hampered by drawbacks such as sophisticated immobilization and stabilization protocol of the enzyme and activity hindrances due to pH, temperature, humidity, and toxic chemicals and so on, leading to poor stability and reproducibility of the sensors4,5,6. To unravel these problems, R&D of enzyme-free electrochemical sensors have becoming a highly desirable alternative owing to their characteristics such as easy fabrication, high sensitivity, fast response, low detection limit, and cost-effectiveness7,8.

In view of the urgent demand in developing new materials for applications in the high-performance glucose biosensors, various studies of non-enzymatic glucose sensors based on metals (e.g., Pt, Au)9,10 and alloys11 have been reported. However, these costy metals showed only fair antitoxic capability, operational stability, and selectivity. Alternatively, electrochemical biosensors based on transition-metal oxides (such as NiO, Co3O4, CuO, and TiO2) and hydroxides were found to exhibit desirable catalytic activity with high sensitivity in alkaline medium7,12,13,14,15. Along the same line, many literature reports have been made available regarding to applications of mixed transition-metal oxides/sulfides in a wide variety of different fields such as energy storage, catalysis, and biosensing16,17,18,19,20. Among them, R&D of mixed metal tungstates (MWO4; where M = transition-metals such as Ni, Co etc.) have drawn considerable attentions owing to their extraordinary physicochemical properties and practical applications as electrode materials in various areas, e.g., photo anodes, supercapacitors, memory devices, humidity sensors, and so on21,22,23,24,25,26. For example, Niu et al. demonstrated23 that nanostructured NiWO4 materials prepared by a simple co-precipitation method showed notable enhancement in electrical conductivity in the order of 10−7 to 10−3 S cm−1 at different temperatures compared to pure NiO (typically, ca. 10−13 S cm−1) due to the presence of various valance states provoked by the incorporated W atoms27.

We report herein, the preparation of octahedron-like nickel tungstate (NiWO4) crystals by using a facile hydrothermal method and their performances as enzyme-free glucose sensors, as illustrated in Fig. 1. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on application of NiWO4 microcrystals for non-enzymatic glucose sensors. It is found that the NiWO4-modified glassy carbon electrodes (GCE) exhibit good electrocatalytic activity toward the oxidation of glucose. Moreover, the biosensors so fabricated show superior analytical parameters, such as wide linear range, excellent sensitivity, and lower detection limit, desirable for electrochemical detection of glucose.

Figure 1. The synthesis route for NiWO4 material and its application as high-performance non-enzymatic glucose sensors.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Results and Discussion

Figure 2A–C displays the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the as-synthesized NiWO4 material, which revealed the octahedron-like morphology with an average crystalline size of ca. 2.0 ± 0.1 μm. Further analysis by energy dispersive X-ray (EDX; Fig. 2E) confirmed the presences of anticipated elements, namely oxygen (O), nickel (Ni), and tungsten (W) with a concentration of ca. 25, 5 and 70 wt%, respectively (Fig. 2D). Moreover, the X-ray diffraction pattern (XRD) profile of the as-prepared NiWO4 in Fig. 2F shows diffraction peaks accountable for the (010), (110), (011), (111), (002), (200) planes, and so on, which match with that of crystalline NiWO4 (JCPDS file no. 15-0755)28,29.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(A–C) SEM images, (D,E) EDX results, and (F) XRD profile of the as-synthesized NiWO4 microcrystals.

The transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of the as-prepared NiWO4 material (Fig. 3) reveal crystals composing of aggregated nanoparticles with an average particle size of ca. 10–20 nm. The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern in Fig. 3B (inset) clearly show the anticipated bright spots with rings, indicating the presence of particles with high crystallinity,in good agreement with the XRD data (Fig. 2F). The textural properties of the as-synthesized NiWO4 crystals were studied by nitrogen (N2) adsorption/desorption isotherms at 77 K, as shown in Fig. 4A. The NiWO4 crystals exhibited the type-IV isotherm curve with a sharp capillary condensation steps at a relative pressure (P/P0) range of 0.43–0.63, which revealed characteristics of a mesostructured materials. Accordingly, the corresponding Brunauer-Emmet-Teller (BET) surface area, total pore volume, and Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) pore size determined by the adsorption branch of the isotherm was found to be 70.7 m2 g−1, 0.07 cm3 g−1, and 4.19 nm, respectively. Furthermore, the thermal stability of the NiWO4 material was assessed by means of thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), as shown in Fig. 4B. The weight-loss at temperatures less than 100 °C (ca. 0.25 wt%) is attributed to the desorption of water molecules, whereas, the notable weight-loss (ca. 3.2 wt%) in the temperature range of 220–480 °C may be attributed to the decomposition of small amount of grafted metal hydroxides. Whilst the marginal weight-loss beyond 480 °C is most likely due to the formation of intermediate compounds30.

Figure 3. TEM images of the as-synthesized NiWO4 microcrystals.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Inset in (B) shows the corresponding SAED pattern.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(A) N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms and (B) TGA curve of the as-synthesized NiWO4. Inset in (A) shows the pore size distribution profile.

The NiWO4-modified GCE was also found to possess superior electrochemical properties than that of bare GCE, as verified by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). As shown in Fig. S1 of the Supplementary information (hereafter denoted as SI), the Nyquist plot observed for the NiWO4-modified GCE in 0.1 M KCl solution containing 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− electrolyte exhibits a much higher charge-transfer resistance (Rct) compared to that of the bare GCE. This is clearly indicated by the larger diameter of the semicircle in the Nyquist plot observed for the NiWO4-modified GCE. Nevertheless, the Rct value so obtained for the NiWO4-modified GCE is still much lower than that of pure NiO31. Thus, it is indicative that the NiWO4-modified electrode possesses a higher electrical conductivity and elelctron transfer rate, hence, more suitable for the electrochemical detection of glucose.

Figure 5A displays the CV curves of the blank NiWO4-modified GCE recorded in 0.1 M NaOH electrolyte solution at different scan rates (10–100 mV s−1) while in the absence of glucose. Both anodic (Ipa) and cathodic (Ipc) redox peak currents as well as their peak-to-peak separation were found to increase linearly with increasing scan rate (see inset, Fig. 5A), indicating the occurance of a surface-controlled electrochemical process. By comparison, such redox peaks were invisible in bare GCE (curve a; Fig. 5B). In the absence of glucose, the neat NiWO4-modified GCE exhibited well-defined redox peak potentials (Epa and Epc) of 0.51 and 0.37 V at a fixed scan rate of 50 mV s−1 (curve b; Fig. 5B), resembling that of the neat NiO-modified GCE32. In this context, while the existence of WO42− polyanions in the NiWO4 composite helps to promote a higher electrical conductivity, the presence of NiO should play the key role for the observed redox behavior24,33,34, which may be explained by the mechanism proposed by Wang et al.15:

Figure 5. Electrochemical performances of NiWO4-modified electrodes.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

CV curves recorded (A) without and (C) with the presence of glucose (100 μM) in 0.1 M NaOH electrolyte solution at different scan rates (10–100 mV s−1). (B) Comparisons of CV curves obtained from (a) bare GCE, and NiWO4-modified GCEs (b) without and (c) with glucose (100 μM glucose) recorded with a scan rate of 50 mV s−1. (D) CV curves recorded under varied concentrations of glucose (99–909 μM). All insets show corresponding calibration plots.

graphic file with name srep24128-m1.jpg

However, upon introducing glucose (100 μM) onto the NiWO4-modified GCE, a notable increase in Ipa along with a decrease in Ipc was observed (curve c; Fig. 5B), which may be ascribed due to formation of gluconolactone through oxisation of glucose by NiOOH15:

graphic file with name srep24128-m2.jpg

Interestingly, the glucose oxidation peak current (4.1 μA) observed for the NiWO4-modified GCE is higher than other Ni-based glucose sensors reported in literature (see Table S1; SI) even at such a low glucose concentration (100 μM). Again, this is attributed to the synergetic effect fast molecular diffusion, rapid electron transfer rate, and existence of active adsorption sites in the NiWO4 microcrystals. In addition, a linear correlation was also observed for both the oxidation (Ipa) and the reduction (Ipc) peak current vs scan rate (inset, Fig. 5C), respectively, while in the presence of glucose, revealing a surface-controlled process. Moreover, a linear correlation was also found between the oxidation peak current (Ipa) and glucose concentration (inset, Fig. 5D).

To evaluate the sensitivity and selectivity of the proposed glucose sensor, we performed amperometric I-t study using the NiWO4-modified GCE as the rotating disc electrode. Figure 6A shows the corresponding amperometric response during successive addition of glucose recorded in 0.1 M NaOH electrolyte solution at an applied potential of +0.55 V. Clearly, a linear correlation between the oxidation peak current and total glucose concentration (from 0.006 μM to 4.1 mM) may be inferred (inset, Fig. 6A). Accordingly, ca. lower detection limit (LOD) was 0.18 μM according to the formula LOD = 3 sb/S (where sb is the standard deviation of the blank signal, and S is the sensitivity), the obtained sensitivity of the glucose sensor was derived to be 269.6 μA mM−1 cm−2, surpassing most Ni-based composite GCEs reported in literatures (see Table S1; SI).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Amperometric response of NiWO4-modified GCE (A) under successive addition of glucose within the total concentration range from 0.006 μM to 4.1 mM; insets: (upper) corresponding calibration plot of peak current vs glucose concentration, (lower) blow-up response curve, and (B) obtained from anti-inference studies under the sequential influence of glucose and electroactive interferences (100 μM), viz. serum (30 μL), serum and glucose, AA, and UA. All measurements were conducted under the conditions: supporting electrolytes, 0.1 M NaOH aqueous solutions; rpm, 1200; applied potential, 0.55 V.

To assess the specificity of the enzyme-free glucose sensor for real-time applications, similar amperometric study was performed on NiWO4-modified GCE under sequential influence of 100 μM glucose and/or other electroactive interferences such as serum (30 μL), ascorbic acid (AA), and uric acid (UA), as shown in Fig. 6B. Obviously, the reported NiWO4-based biosensor is highly selectively for glucose detetion and insensitive towards other interfenence biomolecules. Moreover, the reported non-enzymatic glucose sensor is also insensitive to (glucose-free) serum, which contains a variety of proteins and other common interference molecules. By comparing the amperometric responses of the sensor in the presence of glucose with and without serum, it is clear that the reported NiWO4-modified electrode is indeed sensitive and selective for the detection of glucose. It has been reported that the zeta potential value of the CuWO4 is negative (−20 mV) in wide pH range 3–7 35. Thus, its surface is negatively charged in the pH range 3–7. In evidence, it has also been reported that SnWO4 nanoparticles possess similar negative zeta potential values (−20 mV) in the pH range 3–8, which increased significantly at higher pH values (−40 to −60 mV), revealing the negative surface charges on the SnWO4 nanoparticles greatly increase in alkaline media36. As glucose oxidation is carried out at the NiWO4 electrode in 0.1 M NaOH (pH 13), the surfaces of NiWO4 are expected to be negatively charged. As a result, the negatively charged surfaces of NiWO4 exhibit repelling effect that eliminates the negatively charged interferring species such as AA and UA, providing excellent anti-interference ability. As a result glucose molecules diffuse readily to the electrode surface, wherein the Ni (II/III) redox process efficiently mediates the glucose oxidation, providing greater selectivity.

The long-term stability of the reported glucose sensor was also tested by recording CV curves in the presence of 100 μM glucose under 0.1 M NaOH electrolyte solution for up to 50 consecutive cycles. It was found that the glucose sensor retained ca. 97.2% of its initial osidation peak potential value, revealing an excellent stability. Moreover, the reproducibility of the reported glucose sensor was also examined by performing CV studies of five independently prepared NiWO4-modified GCEs under similar conditons (100 μM glucose under 0.1 M NaOH electrolyte solution). The results so obtained revealed a good reproducibility with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 2.7%.

In summary, NiWO4 microcrystals were synthesized by using a simple hydrothermal method and were employed for the first time as non-enzymatic glucose sensors. The NiWO4-modified electrodes exhibit not only ultra-high sensitivity and selectivity for detection of glucose even in the presence of bio-interferences such as serum, AA, and UA, but also show excellent low detection limit and detection in human blood serum samples. Interestingly, we achieved excellent analytical parameters such as lower detection limit, wide linear range, and good stability and reproducibility. Thus, these NiWO4-based electrodes, which show superior electrochemical performances surpassing other Ni-based electrodes, should have perspective applications as high-performance glucose sensors even in real samples.

Experimental

Materials

The NiWO4 materials were prepared by a hydrothermal method following the conventional procedures. Typically, ca. 6 mM of Na2WO4♦2H2O was add into a beaker containing 25 mL of deionized water. The mixture solution was sonicated for about 10 min before adding 6 mM of NiCl2♦6H2O solution in a dropwise manner under continuous stirring condition at room temperature. Subseqeuntly, the reaction mixture was placed in a 40 mL capacitive Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave and treated at 180 °C for 5 h. Finally, the light green color precipitate was repeatedly washed with deionized water and ethanol several times and dried for overnight. The power sample was further calcined in air at 300 °C for 2 h to improve the crystallinity. All chemicals were obtained commercially and used as received without further purification.

Characterization methods

The as-synthesized NiWO4 samples were characterized by a variety of physicochemical techniques. Their structure and morphology were monitored by field-emission scanningelectron microscope (FE-SEM; JEOL JSM-6700F) and field emission-transmission electron microscopy (FE-TEM; JEOL JEM-2100F). X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies were performed on a Rigaku, MiniFlex II instrument. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms were measured on a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 apparatus. All electrochemical experiments were carried out on a CHI 611A electrochemical analyzer (CH instruments) using the standard three electrode cell system with a modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE) as the working electrode, an Ag/AgCl (saturated KCl) reference electrode and a platinum wire as the counter electrode. The electrochemical performances of the modified GCE for glucose detetion were assessed by cyclic voltammetry (CV), and amperometry (I-t), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) techniques.

Preparation of NiWO4-modified electrodes

The modified GCEs were prepared by first dispersing ca. 5 mg of the as-synthesized NiWO4 powder in ethanol solution under sonication treatment for 2 h. Subsequently, ca. 8 μL of the dispersed solution was drop casted on the well pre-cleaned surface of the GCE, followed by drying in an oven at room temperature. Prior to each electrochemical measurement, the modified GCE was rinsed with deionized water to remove the loosely bounded materials.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Mani, S. et al. Hydrothermal synthesis of NiWO4 crystals for high performance non-enzymatic glucose biosensors. Sci. Rep. 6, 24128; doi: 10.1038/srep24128 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep24128-s1.docx (128KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

Financial supports of this work by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (NSC101-2113-M-027-001-MY3 to SMC; and MOST104-2113-M-001-019 to SBL) are gratefully acknowledged.

Footnotes

Author Contributions S.M. conceived the preparation method, synthesized, performed the physicochemical characterization of NiWO4 nanocrystals and carried out the electrochemical experiments. V.V. and R.M. analyzing the experimental results and preparation of the manuscript draft while P.V. and J.-Y.C. helped in BET and TEM analysis of the materials. S.-M.C. and S.-B.L. supervised and finalized the project. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.

References

  1. Shan C. et al. Graphene/AuNPs/chitosan nanocomposites film for glucose biosensing. Biosens. Bioelectron 25, 1070–1074 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu S. et al. Self-assembled graphene platelet–glucose oxidase nanostructures for glucose biosensing. Biosens. Bioelectron 26, 4491–4496 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Heller A. & Feldman B. Electrochemical glucose sensors and their applications in diabetes management. Chem. Rev. 108, 2482–2505 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bharath G. et al. Enzymatic electrochemical glucose biosensors by mesoporous 1D hydroxyapatite-on-2D reduced graphene oxide. J. Mater. Chem. B 3, 1360–1370 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lin Y., Lu F., Tu Y. & Ren Z. Glucose biosensors based on carbon nanotube nanoelectrode ensembles. Nano Lett. 4, 191–195 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  6. Alwarappan S., Liu C., Kumar A. & Li C. Z. Enzyme-doped graphene nanosheets for enhanced glucose biosensing. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 12920–12924 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  7. Madhu R. et al. Honeycomb-like porous carbon–cobalt oxide nanocomposite for high-performance enzymeless glucose sensor and supercapacitor applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 15812–1582 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kong C. et al. Templating synthesis of hollow CuO polyhedron and its application for nonenzymatic glucose detection. J.Mater. Chem. A 2, 7306–7312 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  9. Yuan J. H., Wang K. & Xia X. H. Highly ordered platinum‐nanotubule arrays for amperometric glucose sensing. Adv. Funct. Mater 15, 803–809 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  10. Martins A. et al. Enantiomeric electro-oxidation of d-and l-glucose on chiral gold single crystal surfaces. Electrochem. Commun. 5, 741–746 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  11. Niu X., Lan M., Chen C. & Zhao H. Nonenzymatic electrochemical glucose sensor based on novel Pt–Pd nanoflakes. Talanta 99, 1062–1067 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ramasamy R. et al. Design and development of Co3O4/NiO composite nanofibers for the application of highly sensitive and selective non-enzymatic glucose sensors. RSC Adv. 5, 76538–76547 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  13. Prasad R. & Bhat B. R. Self-assembly synthesis of Co3O4/multiwalled carbon nanotube composites: an efficient enzyme-free glucose sensor. New J. Chem. 39, 9735–9742 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang C., Yin L., Zhang L. & Gao R. Ti/TiO2 nanotube array/Ni composite electrodes for nonenzymatic amperometric glucose sensing. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 4408–4413 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang G. et al. Free-standing nickel oxide nanoflake arrays: synthesis and application for highly sensitive non-enzymatic glucose sensors. Nanoscale 4, 3123–3127 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Yuan C., Wu H. B., Xie Y. & Wen (David) Lou, X. Mixed transition-metal oxides: design, synthesis, and energy-related applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 1488–1504 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wu Z., Zhu Y. & Ji X. NiCo2O4-based materials for electrochemical supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 14759–14772 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  18. Ding R., Qi L., Jia M. & Wang H. Facile synthesis of mesoporous spinel NiCo2O4 nanostructures as highly efficient electrocatalysts for urea electro-oxidation. Nanoscale 6, 1369–1376 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Naik K. K., Kumar S. & Rout C. S. Electrodeposited spinel NiCo2O4 nanosheet arrays for glucose sensing application. RSC Adv. 5, 74585–74591 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  20. Li G., Huo H. & Xu C. Ni0.31Co0.69S2 nanoparticles uniformly anchored on a porous reduced graphene oxide framework for a high-performance non-enzymatic glucose sensor. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 4922–4930 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  21. Pullar R. C., Farrah S. & Alford N. McN. MgWO4, ZnWO4, NiWO4 and CoWO4 microwave dielectric ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 27, 1059–1063 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  22. He G. et al. One pot synthesis of nickel foam supported self-assembly of NiWO4 and CoWO4 nanostructures that act as high performance electrochemical capacitor electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 14272–14278 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  23. Niu L. et al. Simple synthesis of amorphous NiWO4 nanostructure and its application as a novel cathode material for asymmetric supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 8044–8052 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nithiyanantham U., Ede S. R., Anantharaj S. & Kundu S. Self-assembled NiWO4 nanoparticles into chain-like aggregates on DNA scaffold with pronounced catalytic and supercapacitor activities. Cryst. Growth Des. 15, 673–686 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  25. Sun B., Zhao W., Wei L., Li H. & Chen P. Enhanced resistive switching effect by illumination in self-assembly NiWO4 nano-nests. Chem. Commun. 50, 13142–13145 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Bhattacharya A. K., Biswas R. G. & Hartridge A. Environment sensitive impedance spectroscopy and dc conductivity measurements on NiWO4. J. Mater. Sci. 32, 353–356 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  27. Yan J. et al. Tungsten oxide single crystal nanosheets for enhanced multichannel solar light harvesting. Adv. Mater 27, 1580–1586 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Quintana-Melgoza J. M., Cruz-Reyes J. & Avalos-Borja M. Synthesis and characterization of NiWO4 crystals. Mater. Lett. 47, 314–318 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  29. Song Z. et al. Synthesis of NiWO4 nano-particles in low-temperature molten salt medium. Ceramics Inter. 35, 2675–2678 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  30. De Oliveira A. L. M. et al. Influence of the thermal treatment in the crystallization of NiWO4 and ZnWO4. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 97, 167–172 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang X. et al. Porous Cu–NiO modified glass carbon electrode enhanced nonenzymatic glucose electrochemical sensors. Analyst 136, 5175–5180 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Veeramani V. et al. Heteroatom-enriched porous carbon/nickel oxide nanocomposites asenzyme-free highly sensitive sensors for detection of glucose. Sens. Actuators B 221, 1387–1390 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  33. Omote O., Yotsuhashi S., Zenitani Y. & Yamada Y. High ion conductivity in MgHf(WO4)3 solids with ordered structure: 1-D alignments of Mg2+ and Hf4+ ions. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 94, 2285–2288 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  34. Xu X. et al. Facile synthesis of NiWO4/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite with excellent capacitive performance for supercapacitors. J. Alloy. Compd. 654, 23–31 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  35. Dimple P. D., Rathore A., Ballalc A. & Tyagi A. K. Selective sorption and subsequent photocatalytic degradation of cationic dyes by sonochemically synthesized nano CuWO4 and Cu3Mo2O9. RSC Adv. 5, 94866–94878 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  36. Seidl C. et al. Tin Tungstate Nanoparticles: A Photosensitizer for Photodynamic Tumor Therapy. ACS Nano, doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b03060, (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep24128-s1.docx (128KB, docx)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES