Skip to main content
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1978 Aug;40(8):883–890. doi: 10.1136/hrt.40.8.883

Vectorcardiographic features of ventricular extrasystoles correlated with conventional scalar electrocardiographic interpretation.

S Talbot, D Kilpatrick, B Weeks
PMCID: PMC483503  PMID: 80220

Abstract

Horizontal and frontal plane QRS loops of patients in sinus rhythm with uniform ventricular extrasystoles were constructed from digitised Frank orthogonal electrocardiograms. In 4 patients ventricular extrasystoles were indistinguishable from right bundle-branch complexes, and in another they were indistinguishable from left bundle-branch complexes. In 25 patients ventricular extrasystoles showed an initial delay (greater than or equal to 20 ms) of the QRS, followed by an R loop, which in 13 patients resembled left bundle-branch block complexes, and in 12 patients resembled right bundle-branch block complexes, with an anterior clockwise loop in the horizontal plane. However, the frontal plane loop often did not resemble that of either right or left bundle-branch block. In 51 patients ventricular extrasystoles had an initial delay which was prolonged into the efferent limb of the QRS loop with acceleration of the afferent limb, and/or the QRS loop was directed anteriorly, inferiorly, and to the left. Conventional recordings of these extrasystoles usually showed an initial slow upstroke (or downstroke) of the QRS resembling a delta wave. Apparently uniform ventricular extrasystoles on scalar recordings were shown to be multiform vectorcardiographically though in all such cases the direction of the initial 40 ms forces was constant. It is suggested that the slow initial inscription of ventricular extrasystoles is the result of excitation of ventricular muscle directly and not through specialised His-Purkinje fibres, and that the direction of such initial forces may indicate the ventricular origin of ventricular extrasystoles.

Full text

PDF
883

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Klein M. D., Feldman C. L., Clark D. L., Flessas A. P., Ryan T. J., Peura R. A. Vectorial characteristics of ventricular extrasystoles stimulated during cardiac catheterization. J Electrocardiol. 1976 Apr;9(2):103–108. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(76)80061-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kulbertus H. E., de Laval-Rutten F., Casters P. Vectorcardiographic study of aberrant conduction anterior displacement of QRS: another form of intraventricular block. Br Heart J. 1976 Jun;38(6):549–557. doi: 10.1136/hrt.38.6.549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Rosenbaum M. B. Classification of ventricular extrasystoles according to form. J Electrocardiol. 1969 Jul;2(3):289–297. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(69)80091-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. SANDLER I. A., MARRIOTT H. J. THE DIFFERENTIAL MORPHOLOGY OF ANOMALOUS VENTRICULAR COMPLEXES OF RBBB-TYPE IN LEAD V; VENTRICULAR ECTOPY VERSUS ABERRATION. Circulation. 1965 Apr;31:551–556. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.31.4.551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sano T., Hiroki T., Suzuki F. The vectorcardiogram of ventricular premature beats. An analysis of vectorcardiograms from 100 cases taken by Frank's method. Jpn Heart J. 1967 Jul;8(4):388–400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Talbot S., Dreifus L. S. Characteristics of ventricular extrasystoles and their prognostic importance: a reappraisal of their method of classification. Chest. 1975 Jun;67(6):665–674. doi: 10.1378/chest.67.6.665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Talbot S., Dreifus L. S., Watanabe Y., Chiang R., Morris K., Reich M. Diagnostic criteria for computer-aided electrocardiographic 15-lead system. Evaluation using 12 leads and Frank orthogonal leads with vector display. Br Heart J. 1976 Dec;38(12):1247–1261. doi: 10.1136/hrt.38.12.1247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zoneraich O., Zoneraich S. Bigeminal rhythm, vectorcardiographic patterns in coronary artery disease. J Electrocardiol. 1972;5(3):265–271. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(72)80007-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES