Abstract
Purpose
The mechanisms underlying the topography of motor deficits in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) remain unknown. We investigated the profile of spinal cord atrophy (SCA) in SMN1-linked SMA, and its correlation with the topography of muscle weakness.
Materials and Methods
Eighteen SMN1-linked SMA patients type III/V and 18 age/gender-matched healthy volunteers were included. Patients were scored on manual muscle testing and functional scales. Spinal cord was imaged using 3T MRI system. Radial distance (RD) and cord cross-sectional area (CSA) measurements in SMA patients were compared to those in controls and correlated with strength and disability scores.
Results
CSA measurements revealed a significant cord atrophy gradient mainly located between C3 and C6 vertebral levels with a SCA rate ranging from 5.4% to 23% in SMA patients compared to controls. RD was significantly lower in SMA patients compared to controls in the anterior-posterior direction with a maximum along C4 and C5 vertebral levels (p-values < 10−5). There were no correlations between atrophy measurements, strength and disability scores.
Conclusions
Spinal cord atrophy in adult SMN1-linked SMA predominates in the segments innervating the proximal muscles. Additional factors such as neuromuscular junction or intrinsic skeletal muscle defects may play a role in more complex mechanisms underlying weakness in these patients.
Introduction
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a group of degenerative diseases affecting lower motor neurons [1]. SMA diseases are classically separated in proximal and distal forms [1]. The proximal form of SMA is mainly due to deletions or mutations in the telomeric copy of the survival motor neuron gene-1 (SMN1) [2] SMA III is a milder form of SMA starting after the achievement of walking and is subdivided in SMA IIIa with an onset before 3 years and SMA IIIb after 3 years. Eventually, SMA IV refers to an onset in adults (>18 years) [3]. The reason of the classical proximal predominance of the deficit is unknown and its elucidation would provide an important clue to understand the physiopathology of the disease [4]. New developments in spinal cord MRI provide a unique opportunity to investigate in vivo cord atrophy and to produce an index reflecting lower motor neurons loss, which has never been reported in any SMA type. In ALS, another motor neuron disease that combines lower and upper motor neuron degeneration, cord atrophy measurement reflected grey matter loss [5, 6]. We tested here the hypothesis that the classical proximal predominance of the motor deficit in SMA may be due to predominant degeneration of lower motor neurons at specific spinal cord levels. We therefore quantified, using spinal MRI and for the first time a surface based morphometry technic, the degree of atrophy at different cervical levels and establish comparisons with the distribution of weakness in SMA patients.
Material and Methods
Subjects
SMA patients were recruited from the Myology Institute and the Motor Neuron Disease referral Center (Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France) between May 2009 and March 2011. Local Ethic Committee approved all experimental procedures (Paris-Ile de France Ethical Committee under the 2009-A00291-56 registration number), and written informed consent was obtained from each participant. All clinical investigations and MRI examinations were conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.
Clinical examination
Muscle strength was measured by manual muscle testing (MMT) and performed in all patients by the same experienced neurologist (P.-F. P. among the authors) using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale (0–5) [7]. Particular care was taken to have the patients relaxed before examinations since it was noted that patients with SMA got fatigue easily, which biased muscle strength measurements. MMT subscores were calculated by grouping muscles according to their motor column locations at cervical spinal cord segments: C5 (shoulder abduction), C6 (elbow flexion), C7 (wrist flexion/extension), C8 (abduction of the 1st finger and distal flexion of the 3rd finger). Motor Function Measure (MFM) scale was performed [8]. MFM provides a measurement of the motor capacity by three functional indexes: standing and transfer (D1), axial and proximal motor function (D2) and distal motor function (D3). In addition, SMA patients were scored on the Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) [9]. An arm ALSFRS-R subscore (handwriting, cutting food and handling utensils), and a leg ALSFRS-R subscore (walking, climbing stairs) were calculated (S1 Dataset).
MRI acquisition
Subjects were positioned head-first supine, with a 2-centimeter-thick pillow to lift the head and no pillow below the neck. This strategy was used to limit the natural cervical cord lordosis at around C3–C4, i.e., excessive cord curvature in the antero-posterior (A-P) direction. Subjects were positioned as comfortable as possible, centered in the scanner’s reference and were systematically asked not to move during the acquisition in order to minimize motion artifacts.
Scans were performed using a 3T MRI system (TIM Trio 32-channel, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). The spinal cord was imaged using a three-dimensional (3D) T2-weighted turbo spin echo acquisition with a slab-selective excitation pulse (SPACE sequence: sampling perfection with application optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolution). Imaging parameters were: voxel size = 0.9×0.9×0.9 mm3; Field of View (FOV) = 280×280 mm2; 52 sagittal slices; Repetition time (TR)/ Echo time (TE) = 1500/120ms; flip angle = 140°; generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) with acceleration factor R = 3; turbo factor = 69; acquisition time was 6 min [5, 6].
Data processing
Preprocessing
Data were corrected for non-uniformity intensity using Minc-Toolkit N3 [10]. Two landmarks have been manually defined in the sagittal slice where the spinal cord was the most median in the FOV by an experienced operator on spinal cord MRI segmentation techniques (M.-M. E. M., 5 years of experience, among the authors), to delimit the cervical spinal cord (i.e. from the upper limit of the odontoid process of the C2 vertebrae to the middle vertebral body C7/T1) [11, 12]. Data were cropped and resampled to a voxel size of 0.3×0.3×0.3 mm3 using 3D cubic interpolation in order to maximize segmentation accuracy [12–14]. Fig 1A shows a preprocessed mid-sagittal section in an SMA patient.
Fig 1. Spinal cord segmentation, cord straightening and radial distance illustration.
(A) Preprocessed T2-weighted mid-sagittal section in an SMA patient. The yellow dashed lines delimit the cervical spinal cord region. (B) Resulted segmentation mask (orange). (C) Cervical spinal cord straightening. (D) Mask straightening (orange). (E) Radial distance measurements. A, anterior; I, inferior; L, left, P, posterior, R, right, S, superior.
Segmentation
Data were segmented using a double threshold-based method (DTbM), an improved version of the well-established threshold-based method (TbM) [12, 14, 15]. The same experienced operator as previously, adjusted visually rare poor segmentations using TbM and, when needed, manually [12]. Fig 1B shows an example of segmentation result in an SMA patient.
Cord standardization
Spinal cord masks resulting from segmentation were straightened, then standardized in length by rescaling them to the median cord length (median length across subjects = 413 slices) using 3D nearest neighbor interpolation, leading to a straight and well centered spinal cord masks in the A-P and right-left (R-L) directions in the FOV [11, 12]. Fig 1C and 1D show an example of cord and mask straightening results in an SMA patient.
Radial distance and cross-sectional area measurements
Radiuses from the center of mass of each axial mask to its borders were measured with an angular resolution of 5° by mapping Cartesian coordinates to polar coordinates (one radius every 5°), defined as radial distance (RD) (Fig 1E) [13]. This distance could be seen as a measurement of spinal cord thickness. RD enabled to detect a preferential A-P atrophy direction in spinal cord injuries (SCI) at C2 vertebral level that correlated with the clinical status of SCI patients, represented by the ASIA motor and sensory [13]. RD has also been used to spatially localize the hippocampus diffuse atrophy in Alzheimer patients, a tissue that has a geometry resembling to a bent elliptic cylinder as for the spinal cord [16]. Cross-sectional area (CSA) was also computed. CSA was defined as the cord area in mm2 covered by each axial mask along the standardized spinal cord images (S1 Dataset).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Matlab® (The Mathworks Inc, MA, USA).
Comparison between distal and proximal muscles strength
Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed to test the difference in strength between proximal (MMT C5 spinal level; shoulder abduction) and distal muscles (MMT C8 spinal level; abduction of the 1st finger and distal flexion of the 3rd finger) in SMA patients, a significance level alpha = 0.05 was used.
Comparisons of MR measurements between patients and controls
RD and CSA along the standardized spinal cord images were compared between SMA patients and controls using permutation test (one side, 100.000 permutations) [16]. Permutation tests measure the distribution of atrophy features represented by RD or CSA decrease in SMA patients compared to controls that would occur by chance if patients and controls were randomly assigned to groups [17]. The high number of permutations 100.000 was chosen to control the standard error of the omnibus probability p (SEp) [18]. Given the high number of computed comparisons (72×413 permutation tests for RD comparisons and 413 permutation tests for CSA comparisons), a supra-significance level alpha = 10−3 was used [13, 16]. The previously constructed template [12] was used as a visualization support for the 3D p-values profile resulted from RD comparisons between SMA patients and controls (S1 Dataset). Mean patients CSA was subtracted from mean controls CSA then normalized by mean controls CSA to obtain cord atrophy rate along the cervical spinal cord (in %).
Correlations between MR measurements, clinical disability and disease duration
Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to investigate correlations between RD and CSA along the cervical spinal cord and disease duration, MMT, MFM and ALSFRS-R subscores (non-normally distributed and ordinal data). Due to the high number of comparisons (413 correlation tests), a supra-significance level alpha = 10−3 was used [13, 16]. In addition, CSA gradient from C4 to C7 vertebral levels, corresponding mainly to C5–C8 spinal segments [19] was correlated, using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, with MMT variation from C5 to C8 spinal segments. Rostro-caudal CSA gradient and proximal-distal muscles strength variation were represented by the slop of the straight line that best fits CSA curve and MMT subscores, resulting from a linear regression model.
Results
Demographics and clinical features
Eighteen SMN1-linked SMA patients and 18 age and gender matched healthy volunteers have been recruited. Population demographics and clinical futures in SMA patients are summarized in Table 1. MMT revealed diffuse weakness in the upper limbs involving the muscles innervated by C5 to C8 spinal segments. There was no significant difference between proximal (C5) and distal muscle strength (C8) (Wilcoxon signed rank test; p-value = 0.89) in SMA patients.
Table 1. Population demographics and clinical features in SMA patients.
| Characteristics | SMA patients | Controls |
|---|---|---|
| Number | 18 | 18 |
| Age | 36 ± 11 years | 35 ± 11 years |
| Gender M:F | 10:8 | 11:7 |
| Type | 5IIIa, 10IIIb, 3IV | – |
| Disease duration | 26 ± 15 years | – |
| MMT | ||
| Scores | ||
| Arm (/70) | 56.3 ± 10.2 | – |
| Leg (/70) | 46.7 ± 15.2 | – |
| Total (/140) | 102.9 ± 24.1 | – |
| C5 spinal level (/10) | 7.3 ± 1.9 | – |
| C6 spinal level (/10) | 8.4 ± 1.9 | – |
| C7 spinal level (/30) | 26.1 ± 4.5 | – |
| C8 spinal level (/20) | 14.4 ± 2.7 | – |
| Percent changes (%) | ||
| C5 spinal level | 73.3 ± 19.4 | – |
| C6 spinal level | 84.4 ± 18.9 | – |
| C7 spinal level | 86.9 ± 15.2 | – |
| C8 spinal level | 72.2 ± 13.5 | – |
| MFM | ||
| D1 (/39) | 19.5 ± 11.1 | – |
| D2 (/39) | 37.4 ± 1.6 | – |
| D3 (/39) | 38.3 ± 1.5 | – |
| ALSFRS-R | ||
| Arm (/8) | 7.1 ± 1.2 | – |
| Leg (/8) | 3.3 ± 1.4 | – |
| Total (/48) | 40.2 ± 3.8 | – |
Study of spinal cord atrophy
Comparisons between patients and controls
Fig 2 shows the 3D p-values profile resulting from RD comparisons between SMA patients and controls. RD was significantly lower in SMA patients compared to controls in the anterior-posterior direction and mostly located between C3 and C6 vertebral levels, corresponding to C4–C7 spinal segments, with a maximum along C4 and C5 vertebral levels, corresponding to C5–C6 spinal segments, (p-values < 10−5) [19].
Fig 2. 3D atrophy profile along the cervical spinal cord in SMA patients.
The color-coding indicates regions with significant atrophy (color scale = p-values of the between groups comparison). A, anterior; I, inferior; L, left, P, posterior, R, right, S, superior.
Fig 3A and 3B show CSA profile from SMA patients and controls and cord atrophy rate along the cervical spinal cord, respectively. CSA showed a significant atrophy gradient mainly located between C3 and C6 vertebral levels with a cord atrophy rate ranging from 5.4% to 23%. CSA difference between SMA patients and controls significantly increased from C2 to C3 vertebral level and remained stable along C4 vertebral level with a mean cord atrophy rate equal to 20%. After this plateau, CSA difference decreased slowly and remained significant to the upper part of C7 vertebral level and was no longer significant beyond.
Fig 3. 2D atrophy profile along the cervical spinal cord in SMA patients.
(A) Cross-sectional area profile in SMA patients and controls. (B) Cord atrophy rate in SMA patients. The color-coding indicates regions with significant atrophy (color scale = p-values of the between groups comparison).
Correlations between MR measurements, clinical disability and disease duration
There were no correlations between RD, CSA along the cervical spinal cord and clinical disability subscores MMT, MFM and ALSFRS-R, nor between RD, CSA and disease duration (p-values > 10−3) (S1–S5 Figs). No correlation was detected between rostro-caudal CSA gradient and proximal-distal muscles strength variation (p-value = 0.35).
Discussion
The main results of the present study are: 1) a three- and two-dimensional cervical spinal cord atrophy profile can be established in SMA types III and IV; 2) the A-P predominance of atrophy suggests that RD, in addition to CSA, could be considered as an index of motor neurons loss in the anterior horns; 3) there were no correlations between RD/CSA and the degree or the topography of clinical deficits.
Spinal cord atrophy was quantified using an accurate segmentation method, DTbM [12]. Segmentation accuracy was increased by adjusting rare poor segmentations using TbM and, when needed, manually [12, 14]. Furthermore, a supra-significance level alpha = 10−3 was used to minimize false positive results due to error in RD and CSA estimations [13, 16]. The combination of high segmentation accuracy [12] cord standardization procedure that allowed groups’ comparison for large spinal cord segments [11, 12] enabled producing for the first time an accurate 3D cervical spinal cord atrophy profile in SMA patients using RD [12, 16]. RD analysis showed preferential cord atrophy in the A-P direction of the spinal cord between C3 and C6 vertebral levels, corresponding to C4–C7 spinal segments [19]. The apparent atrophy at dorsal side of the spinal cord was probably an indirect consequence of anterior horns atrophy. In fact, the large atrophy in the ventral region produces a displacement of centers of mass of axial masks towards the dorsal side of the spinal cord. Thus, the measured radiuses from the center of mass decreased in both dorsal and ventral regions in SMA patients, which may explain the visible atrophy at both sides of the spinal cord. It cannot also been ruled out that the atrophy of the dorsal column may participate to some extent. Besides post-mortem and histological studies that reported lower motor neuron loss in SMA patients at the cervical cord level [20–22], two autopsy cases of SMN1-linked SMA patients type III showed a loss of the fasciculus gracilis myelinated fibers [22, 23].
The fact that atrophy predominates in the C5 and C6 spinal segments fits with the classical proximal predominance of muscle weakness in SMN1-linked SMA. Our results are also in agreement with a study in delta 7 SMN mice that compared the loss of motor neurons at different spinal cord levels [24]. The authors showed that the reduction of the mean somatic area of motor neurons was maximal at the C5–C6 spinal levels innervating proximal forelimb muscles and was less severe, and not statistically significant rostrally at the C3 level (phrenic motor neurons) and caudally at the C8 level (forelimb distal muscles).
We showed that RD and CSA were not correlated with clinical deficits. First, we did not find correlations between atrophy at a given spinal level and the deficit in the corresponding innervated muscles. Second, the gradient of spinal cord atrophy did not mirror the distribution of weakness in our series of patients. In addition, MMT at the upper limbs showed the presence of distal weakness, which is in accordance with analysis of the literature in SMN1-linked SMA patients type III/IV [25–29]. Interestingly, a study in a rodent SMA model showed that muscle denervation was located throughout the body involving both proximal and distal regions [30].
In our series, the absence of correlation between SCA and weakness could be related to methodological limits, mainly the small number of patients in this rare disease and a lack of sensitivity of MMT for weakness quantification. Despite of these limitations, our findings are in line with the complexity of SMA pathogenesis, which is related to multiple factors, involving motor neuron cell bodies, motor axons and muscles, converging in affecting the integrity and function of the neuromuscular unit leading to muscle deficits [24, 30, 31]. Particularly, studies in various SMA mouse models pointed out that the disease process may be initiated at the neuromuscular junctions with reduced transmitter release, smaller and immature endplates and neurofilament accumulation at presynaptic terminals [23, 32–34]. A recent study using repetitive nerve stimulation showed a decrement in nearly one half of SMA patients types II and III [35]. Such evidence for dysfunction of neuromuscular junction was detected both in distal and proximal muscle groups of the arm and was predominantly postsynaptic. Interestingly, recent findings in different SMA animal models have highlighted the contribution of intrinsic skeletal muscle defects, with disruption of the myogenic program associated with a decrease in myofiber size and an increase in immature myofibers [36]. A study in an SMA feline model provided convincing evidence that motor neuron degeneration begins distal to the cell body and proceeds retrogradely (« dying-back process ») [37].
From a more clinical perspective, the sensitivity of MRI suggests that quantification of spinal cord atrophy could be a potential biomarker of motor neurons loss in SMA, as previously shown in ALS [5, 6, 38]. There is an unmet need for surrogate markers of disease progression in SMA since clinical scales mildly change over time, especially in SMA types III and IV, in which motor disability worsen very slowly [25, 28, 39]. However, longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate if RD and CSA are sensitive to change over time, as shown for CSA in ALS [6] and could be used as a tool to monitor the effect of investigational therapies. These spinal cord MRI metrics are also applicable to other lower motor neuron diseases such as monomelic atrophy (Hirayama disease) to localize local spinal cord flattening and atrophy [40, 41].
Improvement in MRI techniques are promising to increase the sensitivity of the method particularly at the lumbar spinal cord level which remains technically challenging due to increased physiological motions compared to the cervical level [42]. In the future, the development of high-resolution MRI sequences offers the opportunity to specifically measure grey matter loss [42, 43]. However, the absence of correlations between MRI measurements and clinical deficits suggests that the combination with other methods, particularly electrophysiology [35, 44], muscle imaging [44] or electrical impedance myography [45], may be more suitable to measure disease progression in respect with the complexity of the disease.
Conclusions
This study is a proof of concept that advanced MRI methods can provide indexes of motor neurons loss in the anterior horns in SMN1-linked SMA. Thanks to theses methods, we were able to demonstate that atrophy predominates in the segments innervating the proximal muscles in SMA. In the future, awareness about the potential of advanced MRI methods in this research field should foster collaborative studies that are needed to include larger number of patients and increase the statistical power in transversal and longitudinal studies.
Supporting Information
MAT-file containing individual MRI data, demographics and clinical features.
(MAT)
The color-coding indicates regions with p-values < 0.05 (color scale = p-values of the correlation between MMT C5 subscore and RD).
(TIFF)
The color-coding indicates regions with p-values < 0.05 (color scale = p-values of the correlation between MMT C6 subscore and RD).
(TIFF)
The color-coding indicates regions with p-values < 0.05 (color scale = p-values of the correlation between MMT C7 subscore and RD).
(TIFF)
The color-coding indicates regions with p-values < 0.05 (color scale = p-values of the correlation between MMT C8 subscore and RD).
(TIFF)
The color-coding indicates regions with p-values < 0.05. For correlations between MMT C5–C7 subscores and CSA along the cervical spinal cord, all p-values were higher than 0.05.
(TIFF)
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all subjects for their participation to the study. We thank Kevin Nigaud, Romain Valabrègue, Frédéric Humbert, Antoine Burgos, Mélanie Didier and Eric Bardinet from CENIR for helping with the acquisitions.
Data Availability
A MAT-file containing individual MRI data, demographics and clinical features, necessary to reproduce all results from our study, was submitted as a supporting information: DATA_AVAILABILITY.mat.
Funding Statement
The authors have no support or funding to report.
References
- 1.Van Den Berg-Vos RM, Van Den Berg LH, Visser J, de Visser M, Franssen H, Wokke JH. The spectrum of lower motor neuron syndromes. J Neurol 2003;250(11):1279–1292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lefebvre S, Bürglen L, Reboullet S, Clermont O, Burlet P, Viollet L, et al. Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene. Cell 1995;80(1):155–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zerres K, Rudnik-Schöneborn S. Natural history in proximal spinal muscular atrophy. Clinical analysis of 445 patients and suggestions for a modification of existing classifications. Arch Neurol 1995;52(5):518–523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ciciliot S, Rossi AC, Dyar KA, Blaauw B, Schiaffino S. Muscle type and fiber type specificity in muscle wasting. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2013;45(10):2191–2199. 10.1016/j.biocel.2013.05.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cohen-Adad J, El Mendili MM, Morizot-Koutlidis R, Lehéricy S, Meininger V, Blancho S, et al. Involvement of spinal sensory pathway in ALS and specificity of cord atrophy to lower motor neuron degeneration. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 2013;14(1):30–38. 10.3109/17482968.2012.701308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.El Mendili MM, Cohen-Adad J, Pelegrini-Issac M, Rossignol S, Morizot-Koutlidis R, Marchand-Pauvert V, et al. Multi-parametric spinal cord MRI as potential progression marker in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. PLoS One 2014;9(4):e95516 10.1371/journal.pone.0095516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Great Lakes ALS Study Group. A comparison of muscle strength testing techniques in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology 2003;61(11):1503–1507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bérard C, Payan C, Hodgkinson I, Fermanian J; MFM Collaborative Study Group. A motor function measure for neuromuscular diseases. Construction and validation study. Neuromuscul Disord 2005;15(7):463–470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cedarbaum JM, Stambler N, Malta E, Fuller C, Hilt D, Thurmond B, et al. The ALSFRS-R: a revised ALS functional rating scale that incorporates assessments of respiratory function. BDNF ALS Study Group (Phase III). J Neurol Sci 1999;169(1–2):13–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sled JG, Zijdenbos AP, Evans AC. A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998;17(1):87–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Valsasina P, Horsfield MA, Rocca MA, Absinta M, Comi G, Filippi M. Regional cervical cord atrophy and disability in multiple sclerosis: a voxel-based analysis. Radiology 2013;266(3):853–861. 10.1148/radiol.12120813 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.El Mendili MM, Chen R, Tiret B, Villard N, Trunet S, Pélégrini-Issac M, et al. Fast and Accurate Semi-Automated Segmentation Method of Spinal Cord MR Images at 3T Applied to the Construction of a Cervical Spinal Cord Template. PLoS one 2015b;10(3):e0122224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lundell H, Barthelemy D, Skimminge A, Dyrby TB, Biering-Sørensen F, Nielsen JB. Independent spinal cord atrophy measures correlate to motor and sensory deficits in individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2011;49(1):70–75. 10.1038/sc.2010.87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.El Mendili MM, Chen R, Tiret B, Pélégrini-Issac M, Cohen-Adad J, Lehéricy S, et al. Validation of a semiautomated spinal cord segmentation method. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015a;41(2):454–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Losseff NA, Webb SL, O'Riordan JI, Page R, Wang L, Barker GJ, et al. Spinal cord atrophy and disability in multiple sclerosis. A new reproducible and sensitive MRI method with potential to monitor disease progression. Brain 1996;119(Pt 3):701–708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Morra JH, Tu Z, Apostolova LG, Green AE, Avedissian C, Madsen SK, et al. Automated mapping of hippocampal atrophy in 1-year repeat MRI data from 490 subjects with Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and elderly controls. Neuroimage 2009;45(1 Suppl):S3–15. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Thompson PM, Hayashi KM, De Zubicaray GI, Janke AL, Rose SE, Semple J, et al. Mapping hippocampal and ventricular change in Alzheimer disease. Neuroimage 2007;36(4):1397–1398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Edgington ES, Onghena P. Randomization tests, 4th ed Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cadotte DW, Cadotte A, Cohen-Adad J, Fleet D, Livne M, Wilson JR, et al. Characterizing the location of spinal and vertebral levels in the human cervical spinal cord. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36(4):803–810. 10.3174/ajnr.A4192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Huang K, Luo Y. Adult spinal muscular atrophy. A report of four cases. J Neurol Sci. 1983. October;61(2):249–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Araki S, Hayashi M, Tamagawa K, Saito M, Kato S, Komori T, et al. Neuropathological analysis in spinal muscular atrophy type II. Acta Neuropathol. 2003. November;106(5):441–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Winder TR, Auer RN. Sensory neuron degeneration in familial Kugelberg-Welander disease. Can J Neurol Sci. 1989. February;16(1):67–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kuru S, Sakai M, Konagaya M, Yoshida M, Hashizume Y, Saito K. An autopsy case of spinal muscular atrophy type III (Kugelberg-Welander disease). Neuropathology 2009;29(1):63–67. 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2008.00910.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.d'Errico P, Boido M, Piras A, Valsecchi V, De Amicis E, Locatelli D, et al. Selective vulnerability of spinal and cortical motor neuron subpopulations in delta7 SMA mice. PLoS One 2013; 8(12): e82654 10.1371/journal.pone.0082654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Carter GT, Abresch RT, Fowler WM Jr, Johnson ER, Kilmer DD, McDonald CM. Profiles of neuromuscular diseases. Spinal muscular atrophy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 74(5 Suppl): S150–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gardner-Medwin D, Hudgson P, Walton JN. Benign spinal muscular atrophy arising in childhood and adolescence. J Neurol Sci 1967; 5(1): 121–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I, Fidzianska-Dolot A. Clinical features of infantile and juvenile spinal muscular atrophy In: Gamstorp I, Sarnat HB, editors. Progressive spinal muscular atrophies. New York: Raven Press, 1984: 31–42. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Piepers S, van den Berg LH, Brugman F, Scheffer H, Ruiterkamp-Versteeg M, van Engelen BG, et al. A natural history study of late onset spinal muscular atrophy types 3b and 4. J Neurol 2008; 255(9): 1400–1404. 10.1007/s00415-008-0929-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Meadows JC, Marsden CD, Harriman DGF. Chronic spinal muscular atrophy in adults. Part 1. The Kugelberg-Welander syndrome. J Neurol Sci 1969; 9: 527–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ling KK, Lin MY, Zingg B, Feng Z, Ko CP. Synaptic defects in the spinal and neuromuscular circuitry in a mouse model of spinal muscular atrophy. PLoS One 2010; 5(11): e15457 10.1371/journal.pone.0015457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hamilton G, Gillingwater TH. Spinal muscular atrophy: going beyond the motor neuron. Trends Mol Med 2013; 19(1): 40–50. 10.1016/j.molmed.2012.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kariya S, Park GH, Maeno-Hikichi Y, Leykekhman O, Lutz C, Arkovitz MS, et al. Reduced SMN protein impairs maturation of the neuromuscular junctions in mouse models of spinal muscular atrophy. Hum Mol Genet 2008; 17(16): 2552–2569. 10.1093/hmg/ddn156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Murray LM, Comley LH, Thomson D, Parkinson N, Talbot K, Gillingwater TH. Selective vulnerability of motor neurons and dissociation of pre- and post-synaptic pathology at the neuromuscular junction in mouse models of spinal muscular atrophy. Hum Mol Genet 2008; 17(7): 949–962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kong L, Wang X, Choe DW, Polley M, Burnett BG, Bosch-Marcé M, et al. Impaired synaptic vesicle release and immaturity of neuromuscular junctions in spinal muscular atrophy mice. J Neurosci 2009; 29(3): 842–851. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4434-08.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wadman RI, Vrancken AF, van den Berg LH, van der Pol WL. Dysfunction of the neuromuscular junction in spinal muscular atrophy types 2 and 3. Neurology 2012; 79(20): 2050–2055. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182749eca [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Boyer JG, Deguise MO, Murray LM, Yazdani A, De Repentigny Y, Boudreau-Larivière C, et al. Myogenic program dysregulation is contributory to disease pathogenesis in spinal muscular atrophy. Hum Mol Genet 2014; 23(16): 4249–4259. 10.1093/hmg/ddu142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wakeling EN, Joussemet B, Costiou P, Fanuel D, Moullier P, Barkats M, et al. Failure of lower motor neuron radial outgrowth precedes retrograde degeneration in a feline model of spinal muscular atrophy. J Comp Neurol 2012; 520(8): 1737–1750. 10.1002/cne.23010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bede P, Bokde AL, Byrne S, Elamin M, Fagan AJ, Hardiman O. Spinal cord markers in ALS: diagnostic and biomarker considerations. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2012. September;13(5):407–15. 10.3109/17482968.2011.649760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Werlauff U, Vissing J, Steffensen BF. Change in muscle strength over time in spinal muscular atrophy types II and III. A long-term follow-up study. Neuromuscul Disord 2012; 22(12): 1069–1074. 10.1016/j.nmd.2012.06.352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hirayama K, Tomonaga M, Kitano K, Yamada T, Kojima S, Arai K. Focal cervical poliopathy causing juvenile muscular atrophy of distal upper extremity: a pathological study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987. March;50(3):285–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bede P, Walsh R, Fagan AJ, Hardiman O. "Sand-watch" spinal cord: a case of inferior cervical spinal cord atrophy. J Neurol. 2014. January;261(1):235–7. 10.1007/s00415-013-7193-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Taso M, Le Troter A, Sdika M, Ranjeva JP, Guye M, Bernard M, et al. Construction of an in vivo human spinal cord atlas based on high-resolution MR images at cervical and thoracic levels: preliminary results. MAGMA 2014; 27(3): 257–267. 10.1007/s10334-013-0403-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Taso M, Le Troter A, Sdika M, Cohen-Adad J, Arnoux PJ, Guye M, et al. A reliable spatially normalized template of the human spinal cord—Applications to automated white matter/gray matter segmentation and Tensor-Based Morphometry (TBM) mapping of gray matter alterations occurring with age. Neuroimage 2015. pii: S1053-8119(15)00414-0. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sproule DM, Punyanitya M, Shen W, Dashnaw S, Martens B, Montgomery M, et al. Muscle volume estimation by magnetic resonance imaging in spinal muscular atrophy. J Child Neurol 2011; 26(3): 309–317.s. 10.1177/0883073810380457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rutkove SB, Gregas MC, Darras BT. Electrical impedance myography in spinal muscular atrophy: a longitudinal study. Muscle Nerve 2012; 45(5): 642–647. 10.1002/mus.23233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
MAT-file containing individual MRI data, demographics and clinical features.
(MAT)
The color-coding indicates regions with p-values < 0.05 (color scale = p-values of the correlation between MMT C5 subscore and RD).
(TIFF)
The color-coding indicates regions with p-values < 0.05 (color scale = p-values of the correlation between MMT C6 subscore and RD).
(TIFF)
The color-coding indicates regions with p-values < 0.05 (color scale = p-values of the correlation between MMT C7 subscore and RD).
(TIFF)
The color-coding indicates regions with p-values < 0.05 (color scale = p-values of the correlation between MMT C8 subscore and RD).
(TIFF)
The color-coding indicates regions with p-values < 0.05. For correlations between MMT C5–C7 subscores and CSA along the cervical spinal cord, all p-values were higher than 0.05.
(TIFF)
Data Availability Statement
A MAT-file containing individual MRI data, demographics and clinical features, necessary to reproduce all results from our study, was submitted as a supporting information: DATA_AVAILABILITY.mat.