Skip to main content
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2016 Apr 19;7:467. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00467

The Chemical and Genetic Characteristics of Szechuan Pepper (Zanthoxylum bungeanum and Z. armatum) Cultivars and Their Suitable Habitat

Li Xiang 1, Yue Liu 1, Caixiang Xie 2, Xiwen Li 1, Yadong Yu 1,3, Meng Ye 3,*, Shilin Chen 1,*
PMCID: PMC4835500  PMID: 27148298

Abstract

Szechuan peppers, famous for their unique sensation and flavor, are widely used as a food additive and traditional herbal medicine. Zanthoxylum bungeanum and Z. armatum are both commonly recognized as Szechuan peppers, but they have different tastes and effects. The chemical components, genetic characteristics, and suitable habitat of six cultivars were analyzed in this study. The results indicated that Z. armatum contained a larger proportion of volatile oil, whereas Z. bungeanum produced a more non-volatile ether extraction. The average content of volatile oil and non-volatile ether extract of Z. armatum were 11.84 and 11.63%, respectively, and the average content of volatile oil and non-volatile ether extract of Z. bungeanum were 6.46 and 14.23%, respectively. Combined with an internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) sequence characters and chemical PCA results, six cultivars were classified into their own groups, for the two species in particular. The temperature in January and July were the most significant ecological factors influencing the contents of the Z. armatum volatile oil. However, annual precipitation, temperature in January and relevant humidity had a significant positive correlation with the content of non-volatile ether extract in Z. bungeanum. Thus, the most suitable areas for producing Z. bungeanum cultivars ranged from the Hengduan Mountains to the Ta-pa Mountains, and the regions suitable for Z. armatum cultivars were found to be in the Sichuan Basin and Dalou-Wu mountains. The predicted suitable habitat could be used as a preliminary test area for Szechuan pepper cultivar production.

Keywords: Szechuan pepper, Zanthoxylum, volatile oil, non-volatile ether extract, ecological factors, suitable habitat

Introduction

Szechuan peppers and their related species have been widely used in cooking and medical treatment in traditional Asian cultures, especially in China, where they have been used for centuries. Only the dried fruit with a special aroma, described as the “toothache tree,” has edible and medicinal value (Bautista et al., 2008). However, Szechuan peppers, widely consumed as a spice, are renowned as “magical” and one of “eight essential condiments” in the kitchen because of their exceptional aroma and flavor, with a slightly numbing effect like that from carbonated drinks. Szechuan peppers have also been applied to the treatment of pain, vomiting, diarrhea, ascariasis, and topical eczema treatment, owing to their anesthetic, stomachic, carminative and counter-irritant properties (State Pharmacopeia Committee, 2010; Brijwal et al., 2013; Singh et al., 2013). The special flavor of Szechuan peppers is mainly closely related to their chemical compounds, such as their volatile oil, alkaloids, acid amide, coumarin, lignin, fatty acid, and the small amount of triterpene and sterols that they contain. Among these components, volatile oil, alkaloids and acid amide are the main sources of fragrance and numbing effect (Xue and Pu, 2013). Furthermore, Szechuan peppers play an important role in the Conversion of Cropland to Forestland Program and in the transition of the rural industrial structure due to their ability to conserve soil and water, generate income and improve the livelihoods of local farmers (Zhang et al., 2005).

Chinese farmers have cultivated multiple cultivars of Szechuan peppers during the process, such as Yuexigong Jiao, Lingshan Zhenglujiao, Da Hongpao, and Hanyuan Huajiao, which belong to Zanthoxylum bungeanum. In recent years, Jinyangqing Huajiao and Tengjiao, which belong to Z. armatum, have also been cultivated. The pericarp color of Z. armatum cultivars is bright green and has a more unique aromatic smell; these cultivars are commonly known as “Qinghuajiao” (Figure 1). The pericarp color of Z. bungeanum cultivars are bright red, and they provide a more numbing sensation; these cultivars are commonly known as “Honghuajiao” (Figure 1; Yu et al., 2009). According to research, the cultivars of Szechuan peppers and their related plants are easily confused for their rich biodiversity and morphological similarity (Hou et al., 2014). However, the main chemical contents and suitable habitat are different between these cultivars. The incorrect selection of cultivars in agricultural production can cause economic loss.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Six quality cultivars of Z. armatum and Z. bungeanum during the mature period. ZA1 and ZA2 belong to Z. armatum and the pericarps are bright green; ZB1-ZB4 belong to Z. bungeanum and the pericarps are bright red.

This present study combined molecular and chemical techniques, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and chemometrics analysis (Kress et al., 2005; Sucher and Carles, 2008; Shi et al., 2011; Song et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2014) (1) to assess the chemical characteristics of different Szechuan pepper cultivars, (2) to identify Szechuan pepper cultivars using combined chemical and molecular methods, and (3) to analyze the correlation between chemical contents and special ecological factors, which were then used to predict suitable habitat for Szechuan pepper cultivars.

Materials and methods

Determination of volatile oil (%) and non-volatile ether extract (%) content

A total of 47 batches (dry weight of 5000 g per batch) of six excellent cultivars of Szechuan peppers that belong to either Z. armatum or Z. bungeanum cultivated plants were collected during the mature period in 2014. The cultivars included Yuexigong Jiao (ZB1), Lingshan Zhenglujiao (ZB2), Da Hongpao (ZB3), and Hanyuan Huajiao (ZB4), which belong to Z. bungeanum, and Jinyangqing Huajiao (ZA1) and Tengjiao (ZA2), which belong to Z. armatum (Figure 1). The morphological features and cultivation practice information for six cultivars are listed in Supplementary Table S1 and on a seeding website (http://www.sclmzm.com:88/sczmz/linmuliangzhong.jhtml). The quality of the air, soil and water at all of the sample sites achieved the requirements of the Standard of Ambient Air Quality Standards (GB3095-2012), Soil Environment (GB15618-1995), and the Standards for irrigation water quality (GB 5084-2005), respectively.

Determination of volatile oil (%)

The volatile oil was evaluated according to the volatile oil determination method described in the Commerce Department Standard of the People's Republic of China (SB/T 10040-92) (Commerce Department Standard of the People's Republic of China, 1992) by a volatile oil determination device with steam distillation method. 20.00 g dried pericarp was accurately weighed in a 500 mL flask with three replications; 300 mL water and some glass beads were added, which were then connected to a volatile oil determination apparatus and a condenser pipe. Water was added from the top of the condenser pipe to a volatile oil determination apparatus over the scale until overflowing the flask. The water in flask was heated to boiling and maintained for 5 h until the volatile oil volume no longer increased. Stop heating and cooled the device in room temperature for a few minutes, open the piston of the volatile oil determination apparatus until the upper end of the oil dropped to 5 mm higher than the zero scale. After 1 h, open the piston again until the upper end of the oil dropped to the zero scale. Then read the volatile oil volume, and the content was calculated with the following formula:

T=V/M×100%
  • T: content of volatile oil (%)

  • V: volume of volatile oil (mL)

  • M: mass of the sample (g)

Determination of non-volatile ether extract (%)

The non-volatile ether extract was determined according to the State Standard of the People's Republic of China for spices and condiments determination for non-volatile ether extract (GB/T 12929.12-2008) (General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China, 2008). A 2.000 g sample was accurately weighed with three replications and encased with filter paper; it was then extracted by Soxhlet extraction with absolute ethyl ether for 18 h. The solvent was recovered to 1~2 mL, evaporated in a water bath and heated in an oven at 110°C for 1 h. The sample was then weighed after cooling in a dryer. The steps were repeated several times until two consecutive weights of less than 2 mg. The non-volatile ether extract content was calculated using the following formula:

X=(m2m1)×100m0×100100H
  • X: content of non-volatile ether extract (%)

  • m0: mass of the sample

  • m1: mass of the receiving flask

  • m2: mass of the receiving flask and non-volatile ether extract (g)

  • H: water content of the sample (%)

After that, the volatile oil and non-volatile ether extract contents of Szechuan peppers were analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test (SPSS 19) and a principal component analysis (PCA) (SIMCA-P, version 11.5, Umetrics, Umeå, Sweden) (Xiao et al., 2011).

Genetic diversity analysis

A nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) sequence possesses highly interspecific divergence and the capability to distinguish closely related taxa of medicinal plant at the species level (Chen et al., 2010). In this study, 119 specimens of Szechuan pepper cultivars and seven related species were sampled (Supplementary Table S2). One sequence of Z. ovalifolium var. spinifolium was also downloaded from the GenBank database. DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing were performed as previously described (Chen et al., 2010; Xin et al., 2015). Consensus sequences and coting generation were performed using CondonCode Aligner V 3.7.1 (CodonCode Co., Centreville, MA, USA). All of the ITS2 sequences were annotated with the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) (Wolf et al., 2005; Keller et al., 2009). The sequences were aligned using Muscle, the genetic distance computed by MEGA 6.0 (Center for Evolutionary Medicine and Informatics, Tempe, Arizona, USA) based on the K2P model (Tamura et al., 2011). A phylogenetic tree constructed by employing the neighbor-joining (NJ) tree method, and bootstrap tests were conducted by applying 1000 resamples to assess the confidence in phylogenetic analysis using MEGA 6.0. Three sequences of Toddalia asiatica downloaded from GenBank were chosen as outgroup when the NJ tree was built.

A correlation analysis of chemical composition contents and ecological factors and suitable habitat prediction

A regional information system of traditional Chinese medicine (RISTCM, number 2014SR159435), a GIS-based computer program, was self-developed for the spatial prediction of traditional Chinese medicinal plants (Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 2014). Integrating national geographic, climate (1971–2000) and soil type databases in China, RISTCM was able to determine the impacts of environmental gradients and to predict the large-scale distribution of target medicinal plants (Huang et al., 2010; Wei et al., 2012; Xie et al., 2014b). RISTCM defines the native habitats of a target plant using fuzzy mathematics method based on specimen examination and extracts the ecological factors of native habitats from its databases. Combined with GPS coordinate data from the sample locations, 11 specific ecological factors that were closely related to the development of the crops in agriculture, including elevation (x1), active accumulated temperature (x2), sunshine duration (x3), mean annual temperature (x4), minimum temperature in January (x5), average temperature in January (x6), maximum temperature in July (x7), average temperature in July (x8), annual precipitation (x9), relative humidity (x10), and soil type (x11), were abstracted using RISTCM (Supplementary Table S3) (Chen et al., 2008; Yu et al., 2010; Xie et al., 2014a,b).

A correlation analysis of the main chemical compositions of the six Szechuan pepper cultivars and the corresponding ecological factors were performed using a partial least squares regression (PLSR) with VIP scores (SIMCA-P, V 11, Umetrics, Umeå, Sweden) (Seemann et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2011; Jia et al., 2012). Based on these ecological factors, the suitable habitat for Z. bungeanum and Z. armatum (cultivars) was then predicted based on ecological similarity using a grid-based spatial cluster analysis, vector-based overlaying, intersection analysis and an area calculation using RISTCM (Chefaoui et al., 2005; Liao, 2005; Chen et al., 2008; Yu et al., 2010).

Results

Analysis of chemical composition

A comparison of volatile oil with non-volatile ether extract contents signified that the average content of the volatile oil of Z. armatum was higher than that of Z. bungeanum but was not same as the non-volatile ether extract of Z. armatum (Table 1). The average content of volatile oil and non-volatile ether extract in Z. armatum were 11.84 and 11.63%, respectively, and the contents in Z. bungeanum were 6.46 and 14.23%, respectively. ZA2 (12.78%) contained the most volatile oil, and ZB1 (15.55%) contained the most non-volatile ether extract. A one-way ANOVA indicated that the two species were significantly different in their content of volatile oil and non-volatile ether extract (P < 0.05), and each cultivar was also significantly different (P < 0.05).

Table 1.

The locality and content of volatile oil and non-volatile ether extract from different Szechuan pepper cultivars.

Species Cultivars Abbreviation Locality Longitude Latitude Average content of volatile oil/% Average content of non-volatile ether extracted/%
Z. armatum Jinyangqing Huajiao ZA1 Ribu Village Taoping Town Jinyang County Sichuan Province China 103°15′22.372″ 27°38′39.763″ 7.49 9.77
Jinyangqing Huajiao ZA1 Luxiang Village Honglian Town Jinyang County Sichuan Province China 103°9′3.753″ 27°35′13.75″ 14.16 16.29
Jinyangqing Huajiao ZA1 Guangming Village Pailai Town Jinyang County Sichuan Province China 103°8′7.217″ 27°34′44.197″ 9.99 12.29
Jinyangqing Huajiao ZA1 Qingsong Village Jinyang County Sichuan Province China 103°8′8.287″ 27°35′20.817″ 12.91 11.07
Tengjiao ZA2 Zhige Town Hongya County Sichuan Province China 103°15′5.026″ 29°55′.564″ 10.00 10.12
Tengjiao ZA2 Wulong Village Zhige Town Hongya County Sichuan Province China 103°14′30.762″ 29°54′55.425″ 15.00 11.47
Tengjiao ZA2 Doudan Village Beijiao Town Ya'an City Sichuan Province China 102°58′59.941″ 29°59′12.439″ 13.33 10.39
Z. bungeanum Yuexigong Jiao ZB1 Qingsong Village Banqiao Town Yuexi County Sichuan Province China 102°33′32.35″ 28°45′20″ 6.67 17.07
Yuexigong Jiao ZB1 Qingsong Village Banqiao Town Yuexi County Sichuan Province China 102°33′32.36″ 28°45′21″ 7.47 16.92
Yuexigong Jiao ZB1 Qingsong Village Banqiao Town Yuexi County Sichuan Province China 102°33′34.42″ 28°45′25.55″ 8.33 15.96
Yuexigong Jiao ZB1 Qingsong Village Banqiao Town Yuexi County Sichuan Province China 102°33′59.94″ 28°45′40.16″ 7.50 20.37
Yuexigong Jiao ZB1 Qingsong Village Banqiao Town Yuexi County Sichuan Province China 102°33′59.22″ 28°45′45.75″ 6.24 14.43
Yuexigong Jiao ZB1 Qingsong Village Banqiao Town Yuexi County Sichuan Province China 102°33′58.22″ 28°45′44.74″ 6.66 20.43
Yuexigong Jiao ZB1 Hongguang Village Naituo Town Yuexi County Sichuan Province China 102°36′47.95″ 28°42′38.35″ 5.81 12.43
Yuexigong Jiao ZB1 Hongguang Village Naituo Town Yuexi County Sichuan Province China 102°36′47.8″ 28°42′37.45″ 3.33 12.99
Yuexigong Jiao ZB1 Hongguang Village Naituo Town Yuexi County Sichuan Province China 102°36′46.95″ 28°42′35.43″ 6.66 13.56
Yuexigong Jiao ZB1 Ebu Village Gu'er Town Yuexi County Sichuan Province China 102°41′18″ 28°25′34″ 5.42 14.81
Yuexigong Jiao ZB1 Ebu Village Gu'er Town Yuexi County Sichuan Province China 102°41′56.76″ 28°25′15.32″ 4.99 13.00
Yuexigong Jiao ZB1 Ebu Village Gu'er Town Yuexi County Sichuan Province China 102°41′26.89″ 28°25′14.84″ 5.00 14.61
Lingshang Zhenglujiao ZB2 Renyi Village Zeyuan Town Mianning County Sichuan Province China 102°4′53.202″ 28°12′21.011″ 5.42 11.28
Lingshang Zhenglujiao ZB2 Songlin Village Manshuiwan Town Mianning County Sichuan Province China 102°10′1.56″ 28°12′17.48″ 9.16 14.23
Lingshang Zhenglujiao ZB2 Luba Village Tuowu Town Mianning County Sichuan Province China 102°19′25.227″ 28°47′48.82″ 5.41 15.47
Lingshang Zhenglujiao ZB2 Huangjiaba Village Tuowu Town Mianning County Sichuan Province China 102°18′37.257″ 28°47′48.82″ 8.33 12.15
Lingshang Zhenglujiao ZB2 Dabaozi Village Caogu Town Mianning County Sichuan Province China 102°14′36″ 28°38′21″ 6.66 16.00
Lingshang Zhenglujiao ZB2 Cheyang Village Caogu Town Mianning County Sichuan Province China 102°15′31″ 28°40′54″ 7.08 11.56
Lingshang Zhenglujiao ZB2 Jinguang Village Jinping Town Mianning County Sichuan Province China 101°51′29.706″ 28°27′19.162″ 4.16 11.21
Lingshang Zhenglujiao ZB2 Jinguang Village Jinping Town Mianning County Sichuan Province China 101°51′1.866″ 28°27′44.86″ 7.50 16.24
Lingshang Zhenglujiao ZB2 Jiaoding Village Shaba Town Mianning County Sichuan Province China 102°2′54.348″ 28°10′57.063″ 7.91 13.62
Lingshang Zhenglujiao ZB2 Jiaoding Village Shaba Town Mianning County Sichuan Province China 102°2′18.37″ 28°11′5.629″ 7.50 18.55
Lingshang Zhenglujiao ZB2 Daqiao Village Daqiao Town Mianning County Sichuan Province China 102°13′49.437″ 28°42′1.894″ 3.33 11.03
Lingshang Zhenglujiao ZB2 Dayanjing Village Wuhai Mianning Sichuan Province China 102°15′38″ 28°43′37″ 3.75 16.77
Lingshang Zhenglujiao ZB2 Shigu Village Huilong Town Mianning County Sichuan Province China 102°07′32.1″ 28°28′47.5″ 7.49 13.26
Lingshang Zhenglujiao ZB2 Tianba Village Tianba Luding County Sichuan Province China 102°14′17.02″ 29°54′2.358″ 2.50 12.22
Da Hongpao ZB3 Shuitang Village Zhenping Town Songpan County Sichuan Province China 103°45′53.575″ 32°13′9.126″ 7.08 12.56
Da Hongpao ZB3 Shuitang Village Zhenping Town Songpan County Sichuan Province China 103°46′57′ 32°13′14′ 5.41 9.71
Da Hongpao ZB3 Suoqiao Village Yanmen Town Wenchuan County Sichuan Province China 103°37′41.669″ 31°28′52.577″ 4.58 12.85
Da Hongpao ZB3 Xinmin Village Zhenping Town Songpan County Sichuan Province China 103°52′5.77″ 32°14′6.519″ 5.42 10.40
Da Hongpao ZB3 Xinmin Village Zhenping Town Songpan County Sichuan Province China 103°52′32.539″ 32°13′44.033″ 5.41 10.47
Da Hongpao ZB3 Mayizu Town Jinyang County Sichuan Province China 103°17′1.154″ 27°41′4.056″ 6.25 15.98
Da Hongpao ZB3 Taiping Village Taiping Town Mao County Sichuan Province China 103°40′41.77″ 32°1′17.501″ 5.83 10.95
Hanyuan Huajiao ZB4 Xinli Village Qingxi Town Hanyuan County Sichuan Province China 102°35′12.155″ 29°34′59.343″ 3.33 13.05
Hanyuan Huajiao ZB4 Xinli Village Qingxi Town Hanyuan County Sichuan Province China 102°37′34″ 29°36′02″ 13.33 14.98
Hanyuan Huajiao ZB4 Shuangping Village Qingxi Town Hanyuan County Sichuan Province 102°36′44.682″ 29°35′49.286″ 6.66 9.94
Hanyuan Huajiao ZB4 Guanhua Village Yidong Town Hanyuan County Sichuan Province China 102°26′11.65″ 29°41′10.727″ 6.25 15.50
Hanyuan Huajiao ZB4 Guanhua Village Yidong Town Hanyuan County Sichuan Province China 102°26′13.792″ 29°41′9.657″ 7.50 18.23
Hanyuan Huajiao ZB4 Dadi Village Liyuan Town Hanyuan County Sichuan Province China 102°24′53″ 29°35′19″ 10.83 20.16
Hanyuan Huajiao ZB4 Gaoqiao Village Sanjiao Yidong Town Hanyuan County Sichuan Province China 102°24′37″ 29°41′64″ 10.42 14.23

A further PCA analysis indicated that the Z. armatum and Z. bungeanum cultivars could be clearly distinguished from each other based on the volatile oil and non-volatile ether extract contents, respectively. Two Z. armatum cultivars (ZA1 and ZA2) were located in the upper area of the PCA 3D scatter plot for volatile oil, and most of the Z. bungeanum cultivars (ZB1, ZB2, ZB3, and ZB4) were distributed in the lower part. However, Z. bungeanum cultivars were distributed in the upper quadrants of the PCA 3D scatter plot for non-volatile ether extract and two Z. armatum cultivars were located in the lower region (Figures 2A,B). These results matched the results for the volatile oil and non-volatile ether extract contents.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

PCA analysis based on the contents of volatile oil and non-volatile ether extract of six Szechuan pepper cultivars. (A) PCA analysis for volatile oil content, (B) PCA analysis for non-volatile ether extract content, ZA1 Jiyang Qinghuajiao, ZA2 Tengjiao, ZB1 Yuexigong Jiao, ZB2 Linshan Zhenglujiao, ZB3 Da Hongpao, and ZB4 Hanyuan Huajiao.

Genetic diversity analysis

The success rates for both DNA extraction and PCR amplification were 100%. The sequencing results indicated that highly-qualified bidirectional trace files were located in the ITS2 regions. The ITS2 sequence lengths for six Szechuan pepper cultivars and their related species ranged from 222 to 227 bp, and the average GC content was 70.29% (Supplementary Table S3). The genetic distances for the ITS2 sequence based on a Kimura 2-Parameter (K2P) model indicated that the minimum interspecific distances for all Szechuan peppers and their related species were higher than those of the maximum intraspecific distances, except in the case of Z. bungeanum (Supplementary Table S4). According to the phylogenetic tree analysis, Z. armatum and Z. bungeanum can be distinguished from each other as well as from the other seven related species based on an ITS2 barcode (Supplementary Figure S1). However, the cultivars could not be distinguished because the cultivars of each species shared same haplotype (Figure 3). Moreover, the sequences characters indicated that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) provide insight into the species discrimination: the SNPs occurred only at the species level, not in the cultivars (Figure 3, Supplementary Figure S2). For Z. armatum, three unique inserts exited at site29, site165, and site 215, whereas ZA1 had high divergence. Nevertheless, Z. bungeanum had four unique variable sites that exited at site105, site 191, site 197 and site 203 and ZB3 had high divergence. The genetic distances of ZA1 and ZB3 ranged from 0~0.0089 and 0~0.0320, respectively (Supplementary Table S5). Therefore, the genetic variation of ZA1 and ZB3 was higher than other cultivars in each species, and no genetic variation occurred in ZA2, ZB1, ZB2, and ZB4. In other words, ZA2, ZB1, ZB2, and ZB4 were pure cultivars after long-term artificial processes.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Variable sites and insertions/deletions for six Szechuan pepper cultivars based on ITS2 sequences. The specific variable sites and deletions are highlighted.

Influence of ecological factors on chemical composition and suitable habitat prediction

According to the PLSR analysis, all of the ecological factors were positively correlated with the volatile oil contents of Z. armatum, except for the elevation and sunshine duration and the annual precipitation (Figure 4A). VIP scores of the minimum temperature in January (1.32), average temperature in July (1.29), maximum temperature in July (1.27), average temperature in January (1.24) were larger than 1 indicated most significant ecological factors influencing the contents of the Z. armatum volatile oil (Figure 4B). Only the relative humidity exhibited a negative correlation with the non-volatile ether extract contents of Z. armatum (Figure 4E), but the mean annual temperature (1.80), average temperature in January (1.56), and minimum temperature in January (1.17) were most significant ecological factors and the active accumulated temperature (0.43) is an unimportant ecological factor (Figure 4F).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Regression coefficient of ecological factors (A,C,E,G) and VIP (B,D,F,H) of volatile oil and non-volatile ether extract contents in Z. armatum and Z. bungeanum (the whiskers represent standard deviation). x1 Elevation, x2 Active accumulated temperature, x3 Sunshine duration, x4 Average annual temperature, x5 Minimum temperature in January, x6 Average temperature in January, x7 Maximum temperature in July, x8 Average temperature in July, x9 Annual precipitation, x10 Relative humidity. VIP scores larger than 1 indicated the most significant ecological factors, and the scores between 1 and 0.5 indicated the significant ecological factors, and the scores lower than 0.5 indicated the unimportant ecological factors.

Two ecological factors, active accumulated temperature and annual precipitation, demonstrated a positive correlation with the volatile oil content of Z. bungeanum (Figure 4C), however, the average temperature in July (1.40), maximum temperature in July (1.36), mean annual temperature (1.34), and elevation (1.21) were extremely significant ecological factors (Figure 4D), and the annual precipitation (0.46), sunshine duration (0.38) relative humidity (0.13) were unimportant ecological factors. Furthermore, the sunshine duration and maximum temperature in July had a negative influence on the non-volatile ether extract contents of Z. bungeanum (Figure 4G), but the annual precipitation (1.42), relative humidity (1.21) and minimum temperature in January (1.18) were most important ecological factors (Figure 4H).

Based on these 10 vital ecological factors and soil types, the suitable habitat for each cultivar was predicted by RISTCM software (Figure 5). The suitable production areas for Z. armatum and Z. bungeanum rarely overlap, but the cultivars belonging to Z. bungeanum did overlap. The cultivars belonging to Z. bungeanum can theoretically survive across much of the Hengduan Mountains, Ta-pa Mountains and Qinling Mountains. ZA2, belonging to Z. armatum, was mainly distributed in the Sichuan Basin, and ZA1 was mainly distributed in the Dalou Mountains and Wu Mountains.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Regional division of suitable production areas for Szechuan pepper cultivars in China were predicted by a self-developed and GIS-based computer program, RISTCM. (A) Regional division of suitable production areas of Szechuan pepper cultivars in China (SI 95~100%), (B) Jinyangqing Huajiao, (C) Tengjiao, (D) Yuexigong Jiao, (E) Linshang Zhenglujiao, (F) Da Hongpao, (G) Hanyuan Huajiao, (H) and suitable provinces for Szechuan pepper cultivars with a similarity index of 95~100%.

RISTCM prediction indicated that 9 provinces (including 293 cities and counties) were suitable for growing six Szechuan pepper cultivars. Furthermore, the area was as large as approximately 185, 506 km2 (SI 95~100%), and Sichuan Province was shown to be the largest suitable area for cultivating all six cultivars (Supplementary Table S6). For the Z. armatum cultivars, the Sichuan Basin and Dalou Mountains were predicted to be the primary suitable cultivation region. However, along the Ta-pa Mountains, Qinling Mountains and Hengduan Mountains, Z. bungeanum was more suitable for cultivation.

Discussion

As important edible, medicinal, and economic plants, Szechuan peppers and their related plants are central to traditional Chinese cultures and face an increase in demand along with improvement of quality control. High-quality raw materials from Szechuan peppers that have adequate nutritional value, desirable taste and food safety are fundamental to food production (Konczak and Roulle, 2011).

In previous reports, multiple volatile oil, amides and alkaloids have been demonstrated to be the most bioactive and odorous compounds of Szechuan peppers (Wang et al., 2011; Brijwal et al., 2013). Among those compounds, volatile oil is the principle source of the special flavor in Szechuan peppers and the main indicator of aroma intensity (Singh et al., 2013). Another compound that creates numbness in the mouth originates from unsaturated fatty acid amides, which are defined as a non-volatile ether extract (Jang et al., 2008). The numb quality is strictly described as a tingling paresthesia and numbing sensation. Therefore, these two chemical compositions are the economically valuable indices for Szechuan pepper production. The Commerce Department, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine and Standardization Administration of China also regulated the two chemical compositions as the evaluation indices for quality control (Commerce Department Standard of the People's Republic of China, 1992; General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China, 2008). According to those two national standards, the lowest volatile oil content and non-volatile ether extract content in first-class Szechuan peppers are established at 2.5 and 2.0%, respectively.

By analyzing the chemical compounds of 47 samples, we concluded that Z. armatum contains more volatile oil, and Z. bungeanum contains more non-volatile ether extract. Furthermore, ZA2 contains the most volatile oil and ZB1 contains the most non-volatile ether extract. Moreover, all of the investigated samples achieved the first-class standard or higher. ZA1 showed relatively higher content of both volatile oil and non-volatile ether extract among the six cultivars. Species and cultivars exhibited huge disparity in their content of volatile oil and non-volatile ether extract according to a one-way ANOVA.

In recent years, studies have proven that the combined chemical and molecular method generally and accurately identified and classified species, subspecies and cultivars and efficiently controlled and evaluated the quality of medicinal plants (Djabou et al., 2011; Dong et al., 2012; Ali et al., 2013; Zheng et al., 2014), crops (Caligiani et al., 2014), and food (Snyder and Worobo, 2014). In this paper, a chemical and molecular analysis was jointly used to construct a clear classification of the different types Szechuan peppers. According to the data of sequence characteristics, intra- and interspecific K2P genetic distances and an NJ algorithm, relatively large variation occurred only at the species level but not at the cultivar level. The low level of variation of nuclear ribosomal ITS2 sequences within Szechuan pepper cultivars may stem from the domestication process and the low turnover caused by the long life span of plants. The sequence characteristics also revealed that ZA1 and ZB3 exhibit more divergence than other cultivars, probably resulting from wildly distributed areas with diverse environments. The long-term cultivation environment might be responsible for small genetic changes within cultivars. However, a chemical analysis indicated differences between species and cultivars. On the basis of volatile oil and non-volatile ether extract contents, the PCA results determined that the six cultivars were classified into their own groups, especially between the two focal species. Overall, Szechuan peppers exhibited detectable levels of variation in their chemical components and ITS2 sequences, which enabled the producers to protect and certify products, and provide quality inspection institutions with the ability to spot adulterants and identify fraudulent samples; this also allowed consumers to confidently purchase quality Szechuan peppers.

The PLSR analysis thoroughly illustrated the extent of influence of ecological factors on each chemical composition. For example, Z. bungeanum was dominated by the non-volatile ether extract; therefore, it created a stronger numbing sensation in the mouth. As disclosed in the PLSR results, the annual precipitation, temperature in January and relevant humidity have very significant positive correlation with the non-volatile ether extract contents of Z. bungeanum. Z. bungeanum has been reported to favor humid air and soil (Zhang et al., 2011; Sun et al., 2014). Therefore, the suitable production areas of ZB1, ZB2, ZB3, and ZB4, predicted by RISTCM, were along the Ta-pa Mountains, Qinling Mountains and Hengduan Mountains, in favorably subtropical environments having an average annual temperature of 17.1°C and 800~1400 mm of annual precipitation. The climate features in these areas are perfectly suited to growing Z. bungeanum cultivars.

In contrast to Z. bungeanum, the volatile oil and non-volatile ether extract concentrations in Z. armatum were significant positively correlated with temperature, including the mean annual temperature, minimum and average temperature in January, and maximum and average temperature in July. However, less annual precipitation and low elevation contributed to higher volatile oil content. Therefore, the suitable habitats for Z. armatum cultivars were mainly spread across the southeastern Sichuan Basin. The warm and arid climate of the Chongqing, Yunnan, and Sichuan provinces, with the mean annual temperature and annual precipitation reaching 20.5°C and 967 mm, respectively, stimulated the accumulation of volatile oil and resulted in a stronger unique flavor and less numbing sensation (Zhang et al., 2011). Furthermore, the fact that ZA1 contains more volatile oil and non-volatile ether extract may be attributed to its special distribution areas, including the Dalou Mountains and Wu Mountains (Figure 5D). The average annual temperature in its distribution areas is higher than ZA2. This factor supports the volatile oil and non-volatile ether extract accumulation.

In general, appropriate precipitation and temperature are the key factors supporting the accumulation of flavor compounds. Therefore, the difference between the quantity of two important chemical compositions separately in Z. armatum and Z. bungeanum arose from different ecologic systems. The adaptation of these species incorporated all ecological factors that are good for synthesis and the growth of chemical components, which may be the reasons why suitable cultivation regions for these cultivars in Z. bungeanum overlapped.

In this study, we have proven that the contents of volatile oil and non-volatile ether extract and ITS2 sequence were different in Z. armatum and Z. bungeanum. The ability of a combination chemical and molecular method to classify cultivars enables a supervisory body to better guarantee food authentication and safety. The suitable production areas that were predicted based on ecological similarity between sample sites could be used as a preliminary selection process for Szechuan peppers cultivar production. Based on these results, further studies are needed for a more reliable and representative quality assessment of Szechuan pepper cultivars.

Author contributions

LX, SC, and MY conceived the study and participated in its design. LX, YL, and XL analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. YY and CX conducted the experiments. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for “Significant New Drug Creation” (No. 2014ZX09304307) and the Special Scientific Research Fund of the Forestry Public Welfare Profession “Research into improved varieties selection and the superior-quality and high-efficiency cultivation of Szechuan peppers” (No. 201304703).

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2016.00467

References

  1. Ali Z., Ganie S. H., Narula A., Sharma M. P., Srivastava P. S. (2013). Intra-specific genetic diversity and chemical profiling of different accessions of Clitoria ternatea L. Ind. Crops Prod. 43, 768–773. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.07.070 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bautista D. M., Sigal Y. M., Milstein A. D., Garrison J. L., Zorn J. A., Tsuruda P. R., et al. (2008). Pungent agents from Szechuan peppers excite sensory neurons by inhibiting two-pore potassium channels. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 772–779. 10.1038/nn.2143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brijwal L., Pandey A., Tamta S. (2013). An overview on phytomedicinal approaches of Zanthoxylum armatum DC: an important magical medicinal plant. J. Med. Plant Res. 7, 366–370. 10.5897/JMPR12.743 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Caligiani A., Coisson J. D., Travaglia F., Acquotti D., Palla G., Palla L., et al. (2014). Application of 1H-NMR for the characterisation and authentication of “Tonda Gentile Trilobata” hazelnuts from Piedmont (Italy). Food Chem. 148, 77–85. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chefaoui R. M., Hortal J., Lobo J. M. (2005). Potential distribution modelling, niche characterization and conservation status assessment using GIS tools: a case study of Iberian Copris species. Biol. Conserv. 122, 327–338. 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.08.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen S. L., Pang X. H., Song J. Y., Shi L. C., Yao H., Han J. P., et al. (2014). A renaissance in herbal medicine identification: from morphology to DNA. Biotechnol. Adv. 32, 1237–1244. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen S. L., Yao H., Han J. P., Liu C., Song J. Y., Shi L. C., et al. (2010). Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS ONE 5:e8613. 10.1371/journal.pone.0008613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen S. L., Zhou Y. Q., Xie C. X., Zhao R. H., Sun C. Z., Wei J. H., et al. (2008). Suitability evaluation of Panax quinquefolium's producing area based on TCMGIS-I. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi 33, 741–745. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Commerce Department Standard of the People's Republic of China (1992). Industry Standard of the People's Republic of China-Szechuan Peppers. Beijing: Commerce Department Standard of the People's Republic of China. [Google Scholar]
  10. Djabou N., Battesti M. J., Allali H., Desjobert J. M., Varesi L., Costa J., et al. (2011). Chemical and genetic differentiation of Corsican subspecies of Teucrium flavum L. Phytochemistry 72, 1390–1399. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.03.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dong J. Z., Wang S. H., Zhu L., Wang Y. (2012). Analysis on the main active components of Lycium barbarum fruits and related environmental factors. J. Med. Plant Res. 6, 2276–2283. 10.5897/JMPR10.780 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. General Administration of Quality Supervision Inspection Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. (2008). Spices and Condiments-Determination of Non-Volatile Ether Extract GB/T 12929.12-2008. Beijing: General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hou D. Y., Song J. Y, Yang, P., Zhou H., Yao H. (2014). Application study of ITS/ITS2 barcodes in identification of Zanthoxmli pericarpium. Chin. Pharmacol. J. 49, 534–538. 10.11669/cpj.2014.07.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Huang L. F., Xie C. X., Duan B. Z., Chen S. L. (2010). Research mapping the potential distribution of high artemisinin-yielding Artemisia annua L. (Qinghao) in China with a geographic information system. Chin. Med. 5:18 10.1186/1749-8546-5-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Institute of Chinese Materia Medica China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Peking Union Medical College. (2014). Regionalization Information System for Traditional Chinese Medicine (RISTCM). Beijing: State Copyright Bureau of People's Republic of China, 2014SR159435. [Google Scholar]
  16. Jang K. H., Chang Y. H., Kim D. D., Oh K. B., Oh U., Shin J. (2008). New polyunsaturated fatty acid amides isolated from the seeds of Zanthoxylum piperitum. Arch. Pharm. Res. 31, 569–572. 10.1007/s12272-001-1194-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jia G. L., Huang L. F., Suo F. M., Song J. Y, Xie, C. X, Sun, J. (2012). Correlation between ginsenoside contents in Panax ginseng roots and ecological factors, and ecological division of ginseng plantation in China. Chin. J. Plant. Ecol. 36, 302–312. 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00302 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Keller A., Schleicher T., Schultz J., Müller T., Dandekar T., Wolf M. (2009). 5.8 S-28S rRNA interaction and HMM-based ITS2 annotation. Gene 430, 50–57. 10.1016/j.gene.2008.10.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Konczak I., Roulle P. (2011). Nutritional properties of commercially grown native Australian fruits: Lipophilic antioxidants and minerals. Food Res. Int. 44, 2339–2344. 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.02.023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kress W. J., Wurdack K. J., Zimmer E. A., Weigt L. A., Janzen D. H. (2005). Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 8369–8374. 10.1073/pnas.0503123102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Liao T. W. (2005). Clustering of time series data-a survey. Pattern Rrecogn. 38, 1857–1874. 10.1016/j.patcog.2005.01.025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. State Pharmacopeia Committee (2010). The Pharmacopoeia of the People's Republic of China. Beijing: China Medical Science Press. [Google Scholar]
  23. Seemann A., Wallner T., Poschlod P., Heilmann J. (2010). Variation of sesquiterpene lactone contents in different Arnica montana populations: influence of ecological parameters. Planta Med. 76, 837–842. 10.1055/s-0029-1240797 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Shi L. C., Zhang J., Han J. P., Song J. Y., Yao H., Zhu Y. J., et al. (2011). Testing the potential of proposed DNA barcodes for species identification of Zingiberaceae. J. Syst. Evol. 49, 261–266. 10.1111/j.1759-6831.2011.00133.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Singh G., Kapoor I., Singh P., De Heluani C. S., De Lampasona M. P., Catalan C. A. (2013). Chemistry and antioxidant properties of essential oil and oleoresins extracted from the seeds of tomer (Zanthoxylum armatum DC). Int. J. Food Prop. 16, 288–300. 10.1080/10942912.2010.551311 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Snyder A. B., Worobo R. W. (2014). Chemical and genetic characterization of bacteriocins: antimicrobial peptides for food safety. J. Sci. Food Agric. 94, 28–44. 10.1002/jsfa.6293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Song J. Y., Shi L. C., Li D. Z., Sun Y. Z., Niu Y. Y., Chen Z. D., et al. (2012). Extensive pyrosequencing reveals frequent intra-genomic variations of internal transcribed spacer regions of nuclear ribosomal DNA. PLoS ONE 7:e43971. 10.1371/journal.pone.0043971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sucher N. J., Carles M. C. (2008). Genome-based approaches to the authentication of medicinal plants. Plant Med. 74, 603. 10.1055/s-2008-1074517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sun Y. L., Bian X. J., Wei B. L., Liu H., Zhang J. Q. (2014). Analysis of eco-climate suitability of prickly ash and climatic model of yield dynamic in Gansu Linxia. Xi Nan Nong Ye Xue Bao 27, 846–852. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M., Kumar S. (2011). MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2731–2739. 10.1093/molbev/msr121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang C. F., Yang K., Zhang H. M., Cao J., Fang R., Liu Z. L., et al. (2011). Components and insecticidal activity against the maize weevils of Zanthoxylum schinifolium fruits and leaves. Molecules 16, 3077–3088. 10.3390/molecules16043077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wei Z. H., Wang X. M., Qiao Q. M., Cheng M. G., Liu Y. L., Xie C. X., et al. (2012). On regional division of suitable producing areas of Yu Salvia miltiorrhiza. Asian Agric. Res. 4, 130–132. Available online at: http://purl.umn.edu/143480 [Google Scholar]
  33. Wolf M., Achtziger M., Schultz J., Dandekar T., Müller T. (2005). Homology modeling revealed more than 20,000 rRNA internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) secondary structures. RNA 11, 1616–1623. 10.1261/rna.2144205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Xiao W. L., Motley T. J., Unachukwu U. J., Lau C. B. S., Jiang B., Hong F., et al. (2011). Chemical and genetic assessment of variability in commercial Radix Astragali (Astragalus spp.) by ion trap LC-MS and nuclear ribosomal DNA barcoding sequence analyses. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 1548–1556. 10.1021/jf1028174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Xie C. X., Song J. Y., Suo F. M., Li X. W, Li, Y., Yu H., et al. (2014a). Natural resource monitoring of Rheum tanguticum by multilevel remote sensing. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2014:618902. 10.1155/2014/618902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Xie C. X., Wang H., Huang L. F., Li H., Song J. Y. (2014b). Determination of production regions for pollution-free Chinese medicinal materials by geographic information system: Achyranthes bidentata (Niu Qi) in Tianjin as an example. Chin. Med. 9:25. 10.1186/1749-8546-9-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Xin T. Y., Li X. J., Yao H., Lin Y. L., Ma X. C., Cheng R. Y., et al. (2015). Survey of commercial Rhodiola products revealed species diversity and potential safety issues. Sci. Rep. 5, 8337. 10.1038/srep08337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Xue X. H., Pu B. (2013). Research and development situation of Zanthoxylum bungeanum flavor component and products. He Nong Xue Bao 27, 1724–1728. [Google Scholar]
  39. Yang S. T., Li J. H., Zhao Y. P, Chen, B. L., Fu C. X. (2011). Harpagoside variation is positively correlated with temperature in Scrophularia ningpoensis Hemsl. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 1612–1621. 10.1021/jf104702u [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Yu H., Xie C. X., Song J. Y., Zhou Y. Q., Chen S. L. (2010). TCMGIS-II based prediction of medicinal plant distribution for conservation planning: a case study of Rheum tanguticum. Chin. Med. 5:31. 10.1186/1749-8546-5-31 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Yu X. Q., Zheng X. Y., Kan J. Q., Guo J. (2009). Evaluation of specific quality of Zanthoxylum bungeanum Maxim and Zanthoxylum schinifolium Sieb.et Zucc. Food Sci. 30, 45–48. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang Q. Y., Pang X. L., Li D. R., Bao Y. H. (2011). Characteristics and distribution of common cultivars of Szechuan peppers in Sichuan. Sci. Technol. W. China 10, 43. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang X. Q., Zhao L. H., Yang P. (2005). The species resource of Zanthoxylum genus and the ecological functions review of it's planting. Xi Chang Xue Yuan Xue Bao (Nat. Sci. Ed) 19, 12–14. [Google Scholar]
  44. Zheng S. H., Jiang X., Wu L. B., Wang Z. H., Huang L. F. (2014). Chemical and genetic discrimination of cistanches herba based on UPLC-QTOF/MS and DNA barcoding. PLoS ONE 9:e98061. 10.1371/journal.pone.0098061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES