Skip to main content
PMC home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1994 Jan;71(1):38–40. doi: 10.1136/hrt.71.1.38

Implication of prescriptions for nitrates: 7 year follow up of patients treated for angina in general practice.

K W Clarke 1, D Gray 1, J R Hampton 1
PMCID: PMC483607  PMID: 8297692

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To determine the demand placed on local cardiological services by patients prescribed nitrates for ischaemic heart disease. DESIGN--A follow up study of a cohort of patients identified in 1985. SETTING--Nottingham Health District. PATIENTS--Four hundred and ninety nine patients prescribed nitrates in 1985 for presumed ischaemic heart disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Referral to medical outpatients, admittance to hospital with chest pain, cardiological investigations, and mortality. RESULTS--Over the seven year period 26% of patients were admitted urgently with chest pain and 15% were referred to the medical outpatient department--a referral rate of 6% a year. 4% of patients had an exercise test and 6% a coronary angiogram. The death rate was 6% a year and a higher proportion died of cardiovascular causes than would be expected in the general population. CONCLUSIONS--Prescription of nitrate is useful in the determination of the prevalence of ischaemic heart disease. Most patients with angina are still treated within the community, and the rate of specialist investigation remains low.

Full text

PDF
38

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cannon P. J., Connell P. A., Stockley I. H., Garner S. T., Hampton J. R. Prevalence of angina as assessed by a survey of prescriptions for nitrates. Lancet. 1988 Apr 30;1(8592):979–981. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)91790-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fry J. The natural history of angina in a general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1976 Sep;26(170):643–646. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Harris P. J., Harrell F. E., Jr, Lee K. L., Behar V. S., Rosati R. A. Survival in medically treated coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1979 Dec;60(6):1259–1269. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.60.6.1259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kannel W. B., Feinleib M. Natural history of angina pectoris in the Framingham study. Prognosis and survival. Am J Cardiol. 1972 Feb;29(2):154–163. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(72)90624-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mock M. B., Ringqvist I., Fisher L. D., Davis K. B., Chaitman B. R., Kouchoukos N. T., Kaiser G. C., Alderman E., Ryan T. J., Russell R. O., Jr Survival of medically treated patients in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS) registry. Circulation. 1982 Sep;66(3):562–568. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.66.3.562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rose G., Hamilton P. S., Keen H., Reid D. D., McCartney P., Jarrett R. J. Myocardial ischaemia, risk factors and death from coronary heart-disease. Lancet. 1977 Jan 15;1(8003):105–109. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)91701-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Shaper A. G., Cook D. G., Walker M., Macfarlane P. W. Prevalence of ischaemic heart disease in middle aged British men. Br Heart J. 1984 Jun;51(6):595–605. doi: 10.1136/hrt.51.6.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Smith R. Rationing: the search for sunlight. BMJ. 1991 Dec 21;303(6817):1561–1562. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6817.1561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. van Zwieten P. A. Different types of centrally acting antihypertensive drugs. Eur Heart J. 1992 Jun;13 (Suppl A):18–21. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/13.suppl_a.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES