ABSTRACT
Objectives
To evaluate the sealing ability of three root-end filling materials (white MTA, CPM, and MBPc) using an Enterococcus faecalis leakage model.
Material and Methods
Seventy single-root extracted human teeth were instrumented and root-ends were resected to prepare 3 mm depth cavities. Root-end preparations were filled with white MTA, CPM, and MBPc cements. Enterococcus faecalis was coronally introduced and the apical portion was immersed in BHI culture medium with phenol red indicator. The bacterial leakage was monitored every 24 h for 4 weeks. The statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon-Gehan test (p<0.05).
Results
All cements showed bacterial leakage after 24 hours, except for the negative control group. The MBPc showed significantly less bacterial leakage compared with the MTA group (p<0.05). No significant differences were found between the CPM and the other groups.
Conclusions
The epoxy resin-based cement MBPc had lower bacterial leakage compared with the calcium silicate-based cements MTA and CPM.
Keywords: Endodontics, Dental pulp cavity, Epoxy resins
INTRODUCTION
Persistent microorganisms are the main factors associated with chronic apical periodontitis and consequent Endodontic failures 10 . One of the indications for periradicular surgery is when the conventional treatment is not able to eliminate the microorganisms of the apical portion 7 . These procedures involve the use of filling materials to prevent bacterial leakage and the reinfection of the root canal system 27 . Therefore, it is crucial for the cement used to obturate root-end cavities to be able to provide a tridimensional filling.
Several materials were suggested for retrograde fillings, e.g., amalgam, EBA, IRM, gutta-percha, and MTA 2 , 32 . The Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) is currently used in retrograde fillings, showing satisfactory physicochemical 15 , 29 and biological properties 28 , 30 . Other cements are studied as alternatives for the MTA. In 2004, a novel root-end filling material comparable with the MTA was developed. The CPM (EGEO SLR, MTM Argentina SA, Buenos Aires, Argentina) is composed of a powder mainly made of Portland cement and a liquid with distilled water in its composition. The CPM cement presents antimicrobial activity 23 , satisfactory biological response 18 , 20 , and adequate physicochemical properties 4 , 24 .
Epoxy-resin based cements have been widely studied for Endodontic procedures since 1957 8 , 19 . In 1984, Moraes and Berbert developed an epoxy resin-based cement containing calcium hydroxide to be used as a retrograde filling material 13 . The MBPc is consisted of hydrophobic base paste/catalyst paste cement 14 . Promissory results regarding its physical 34 , chemical 14 , 33 , and biological 3 , 9 properties were found. Nonetheless, this cement requires more investigation to be considered clinically useful.
There are several methods to evaluate the sealing ability of filling materials such as fluid infiltration 34 , radioisotope 22 , dye penetration 6 , 14 , and bacterial leakage 21 . Radioisotope and dye penetration methods present the disadvantage of having the molecular size of radioisotopes tracers and dye particles smaller than bacteria 31 . On the other hand, bacterial leakage is considered more clinically relevant 31 . This method is widely used in Endodontic research to evaluate the sealing ability of root canal sealers 12 , 26 and root-end filling materials 1 , 11 . A previous study has compared MTA, CPM, and MBPc cements using a dye penetration model 14 . Considering the limitations of this method, it is indispensable for us to investigate if there is bacterial infiltration in root-end fillings with these cements. Thus, the aim of the study was to evaluate the sealing ability of three root-end filling materials (white MTA, CPM, and MBPc) using an Enterococcus faecalis leakage model.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Seventy intact, caries-free, single-rooted permanent human teeth were selected. The ethics committee of the Bauru School of Dentistry approved the use of teeth for research purposes (CEP 049-2007). All teeth were autoclaved. The coronal portions were sectioned 1.0 mm below the dental-enamel junction using a 0.3 mm Isomet saw (Buehler, Lake Bluff, Illinois, USA). Roots were standardized at 15 mm and the working length (WL) was established 1.0 mm from the apical foramen. Root canals were prepared using the crown-down technique with K-files (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). Apical preparation was performed at working length up to a size 40 K-file. The shaping procedure was completed with 2 and 3 Gates-Glidden drills (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). After the use of each instrument, we irrigated the canal with 2 mL of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. The smear layer was removed with 2 mL of 17% EDTA (Biodinâmica, Ibiporã, Paraná, Brazil) for three minutes, then a 2 mL flush of distilled water was used as the final rinse and the canals were dried with paper points (DentsplyMaillefer). The final 3.0 mm of each root was resected with a cylindrical diamond bur, perpendicularly to the long axis of the root. A root-end cavity with 3.0 mm of depth and 1.0 mm of diameter was prepared. A gutta-percha cone of size 40.02 was inserted into the root canal 3 mm from the final of the root to provide an intracanal matrix to pack the root-end filling material against.
Root-end filling
The specimens were randomly divided in three groups (n=20):
Group 1: MTA (Angelus, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil);
Group 2: CPM (Egeo, Buenos Aires, Argentine);
Group 3: MBPc.
The composition of the evaluated cements is present in Figure 1. Cements were manipulated by following the manufacturer’s instructions. They were incrementally inserted into the root-end cavities and vertically compacted using a hand plugger. Specimens were stored in 100% of humidity at 37°C for one week to allow the cements to set. For negative control (n=5), the entire root surface was coated with two layers of nail varnish (Colorama, L’Oréal, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) after filling all root-end cavities. Positive control (n=5) was left with unfilled root-end cavities.
Bacterial leakage
The apparatus used to evaluate the leakage was prepared as previously described 21 . Glass vials with rubber stoppers were adjusted to use. Using a high-speed handpiece, a hole was made through the centre of each rubber stopper in which each tooth was inserted under a pressure up to 4 mm from the apical portion. An epoxy resin-based varnish (Araldite, Brascola, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) was used to seal the interface between tooth and rubber stopper. Cylinders prepared with 10 mL plastic syringes were adapted to the outer surface of the stoppers to create a chamber around the crown of the tooth. The apparatus was sterilized in ethylene oxide gas for a 4 h cycle at 56°C (Figure 2).
The standard bacterial strains of Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212) were used in the study. The Brain Heart Infusion Medium (BHI, Difco, BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, Maryland, USA) was used for bacterial growth. Enterococcus faecalis was inoculated in tubes containing 5 mL of sterile BHI suspension and incubated at 37oC for 24 hours. To adjust the experimental suspensions, turbidity of culture microorganisms were verified with an spectrophotometer (1105, Bel Photonics do Brasil Ltda., Osasco, Brazil) at 540 nm, bacterial cells were resuspended according to the MacFarland scale to obtain a final concentration of 3x108 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL. The purity of the cultures was confirmed by the Gram staining method and the morphology of the colony.
Sterile pipettes were used to place 400 µl of bacterial inoculum in each access cavity found in the syringe apparatuses (in the upper region, removing the gauze stop). The 4 mm of root-ends were immersed in sterile BHI. The apparatus was incubated at 37°C for 120 days and checked daily for turbidity in the BHI broth. Bacterial leakage was considered when turbidity was observed (Table 1).
Table 1. Number of samples with positive bacterial leakage every 30 days.
Cement | Total of samples | 1-30 days | 31-60 days | 61-90 days | 91-120 days | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
White MTA | 20 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
CPM | 20 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
MBPc | 20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Positive control | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Negative control | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon-Gehan test to compare the evaluated groups (p<0.05).
RESULTS
The criteria evaluated with experimental periods are shown in Figure 3. All cements showed bacterial leakage after 24 hours, except for the negative control group. The MTA showed a higher number of specimens that leaked compared with the MBPc group (p<0.05). Statistical similarities for bacterial leakage were found between the CPM and the MBPc and also the MTA (p>0.05). After 31 days until the final period, only one specimen (MBPc) among all groups showed infiltration.
DISCUSSION
The success of retrograde fillings concerns the properties of the cement used 17 . The aim of root-end filling materials is to adhere to the dentine of the apical portion difficulty bacterial leakage providing conditions to periapical healing 32 . The sealing ability of a cement can be determined using leakage methods 12 , 14 , confocal microscopy 32 , scanning electron microscopy 25 , and more recently micro-computed tomography analysis 35 . The bacterial leakage method has the advantage of providing a clinically relevant adaptability date of materials for root canal walls 31 .
The Enterococcus faecalis was chosen for this study model because it is commonly present in secondary infections from Endodontic treatment failures. This microorganism is a gram-positive coccus and is highly resistant to alkaline pH such as the one present in the calcium hydroxide paste. Because of its high incidence in filled root canals and their drug resistance, the E. faecalis has been proposed as an Endodontic pathogen 16 . Furthermore, this microorganism is easily arranged and interpreted from the study data 11 . Under the conditions of this study, this microorganism was able to leak in all experimental cements. On the other hand, Jacobovitz, et al. 5 (2009), using another model of in vitro microleakage analysis with the same microorganism, found that the MTA showed no microbial growth after 30 days.
The results found in the present study showed that the bacterial leakage occurred after 24 hours in at least one specimen for MTA, CPM, and MBPc cements. During the experimental period, all groups showed decrease in the number of leaked specimens. A possible explanation is that the cements expanded into the cavities during the period and difficult the leakage. The results found in the present study are according to that previously found by Orosco, et al. 35 (2008), although they have used the dye penetration method.
Although no statistical differences were found between MBPc and CPM cements (p>0.05), the MBPc showed statistically less infiltration compared with the MTA (p<0.05). In a previous study, the MBPc showed satisfactory results for marginal adaptation and leakage 14 . Vasconcelos, et al. 34 (2011) reported low leakage ranges for epoxy-resin sealers MBPc and AH Plus compared with the MTA, using a fluid infiltration method. Possibly the presence of epoxy-resin improved the sealing of MBPc and AH Plus in dentin walls.
The modified Portland cement (CPM) contains calcium carbonate, silicon dioxide, bismuth trioxide, and barium sulphate 33 . Probably, the presence of calcium carbonate could be the responsible for offering a great calcium ions release, which may promote the adhesion to dentinal canal walls, thus improving sealing properties 33 . According to the results, this cement has not been able to inhibit bacterial leakage completely. The absence of studies evaluating the CPM makes difficult the comparison regarding its sealing ability.
Further studies should use the confocal laser scanning (CLSM) microscopy to detect and quantify bacterial viability in void spaces or gaps between cavity walls. Moreover, prospective clinical studies evaluating the success rate of Endodontic surgeries using the tested sealers might prove to be informative.
CONCLUSION
The epoxy resin-based cement MBPc had lower bacterial leakage compared with the calcium silicate-based cements MTA and CPM.
REFERENCES
- 1.Adamo HL, Buruiana R, Schertzer L, Boylan RJ. A comparison of MTA, Super-EBA, composite and amalgam as root-end filling materials using a bacterial microleakage model. Int Endod J. 1999;32(3):197–203. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00214.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Beltes P, Zervas P, Lambrianidis T, Molyvdas I. In vitro study of the sealing ability of four retrograde filling materials. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1988;4(2):82–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1988.tb00300.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cintra LT, Moraes IG, Estrada BP, Gomes JE, Filho, Bramante CM, Garcia RB, et al. Evaluation of the tissue response to MTA and MBPC: microscopic analysis of implants in alveolar bone of rats. J Endod. 2006;32(6):556–559. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Duarte MA, Goncalves M, Tanomaru M., Filho Radiopacity evaluation of root canal sealers containing calcium hydroxide and MTA. Braz Oral Res. 2009;23(1):119–123. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242009000200005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jacobovitz M, Vianna ME, Pandolfelli VC, Oliveira IR, Rossetto HL, Gomes BP. Root canal filling with cements based on mineral aggregates: an in vitro analysis of bacterial microleakage. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108(1):140–144. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Leonardo MV, Goto EH, Torres CR, Borges AB, Carvalho CA, Barcellos DC. Assessment of the apical seal of root canals using different filling techniques. J Oral Sci. 2009;51(4):593–599. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.51.593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lopes HP, Siqueira JF., Junior . Endodontics: biology and techniques. Rio de Janeiro: MEDSI; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Marciano MA, Ordinola-Zapata R, Cunha TV, Duarte MA, Cavenago BC, Garcia RB, et al. Analysis of four gutta-percha techniques used to fill mesial root canals of mandibular molars. Int Endod J. 2011;44(4):321–329. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01832.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Miranda RB, Fidel SR, Boller MA. L929 cell response to root perforation repair cements: an in vitro cytotoxicity assay. Braz Dent J. 2009;20(1):22–26. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402009000100003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nair PN, Sjogren U, Krey G, Kahnberg KE, Sundqvist G. Intraradicular bacteria and fungi in root-filled, asymptomatic human teeth with therapy-resistant periapical lesions: a long-term light and electron microscopic follow-up study. J Endod. 1990;16(12):580–588. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(07)80201-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nair U, Ghattas S, Saber M, Natera M, Walker C, Pileggi R. A comparative evaluation of the sealing ability of 2 root-end filling materials: an in vitro leakage study using Enterococcus faecalis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112(2):e74–e77. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.01.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Oliveira ACM, Tanomaru JM, Faria N, Junior, Tanomaru M., Filho Bacterial leakage in root canals filled with conventional and MTA-based sealers. Int Endod J. 2011;44(4):370–375. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01852.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Orosco FA, Bramante CM, Garcia RB, Bernadineli N, Moraes IG. Sealing ability of grar MTA AngelusTM, CPM TM and MBPc used as apical plugs. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008;16(1):50–54. doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572008000100010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Orosco FA, Bramante CM, Garcia RB, Bernardineli N, Moraes IG. Sealing ability, marginal adaptation and their correlation using three root-end filling materials as apical plugs. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;18(2):127–134. doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572010000200006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review--Part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. J Endod. 2010;36(1):16–27. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Sousa EL, Teixeira FB, Souza FJ., Filho Microorganisms from canals of root-filled teeth with periapical lesions. Int Endod J. 2003;36(1):1–11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00603.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pitt Ford TR, Roberts GJ. Tissue response to glass ionomer retrograde root fillings. Int Endod J. 1990;23(5):233–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1990.tb00854.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Scarparo RK, Haddad D, Acasigua GA, Fossati AC, Fachin EV, Grecca FS. Mineral trioxide aggregate-based sealer: analysis of tissue reactions to a new endodontic material. J Endod. 2010;36(7):1174–1178. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Silva GF, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Sasso-Cerri E, Tanomaru M, Filho, Cerri PS. Histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of furcation perforations filled with MTA, CPM and ZOE. Int Endod J. 2011;44(2):100–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01803.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schroeder A. Endodontics - science and practice: a textbook for student and practioner. Chicago: Quintessence; 1981. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Siqueira JF, Jr, Rocas IN, Abad EC, Castro AJ, Gahyva SM, Favieri A. Ability of three root-end filling materials to prevent bacterial leakage. J Endod. 2001;27(11):673–675. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200111000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Szeremeta-Browar TL, VanCura JE, Zaki AE. A comparison of the sealing properties of different retrograde techniques: an autoradiographic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985;59(1):82–87. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(85)90121-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tanomaru JM, Tanomaru M, Filho, Hotta J, Watanabe E, Ito IY. Antimicrobial activity of endodontic sealers based on calcium hydroxide and MTA. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2008;21(2):147–151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tanomaru M, Filho, Faleiros FB, Sacaki JN, Duarte MA, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM. Evaluation of pH and calcium ion release of root-end filling materials containing calcium hydroxide or mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2009;35(10):1418–1421. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tanzilli JP, Raphael D, Moodnik RM. A comparison of the marginal adaptation of retrograde techniques: a scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1980;50(1):74–80. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(80)90335-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tasdemir T, Yildirim T, Buruk K, Celik D, Cora S, Tahan E, et al. Comparison of the sealing ability of three filling techniques in canals shaped with two different rotary systems: a bacterial leakage study. [cited 2016 Jan 20];Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 108(3):e129–e134. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Torabinejad M, Higa RK, McKendry DJ, Pitt Ford TR. Dye leakage of four root end filling materials: effects of blood contamination. J Endod. 1994;20(4):159–163. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80326-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Torabinejad M, Hong CU, Lee SJ, Monsef M, Pitt Ford TR. Investigation of mineral trioxide aggregate for root-end filling in dogs. J Endod. 1995;21(12):603–608. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81112-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Torabinejad M, Hong CU, McDonald F, Pitt Ford TR. Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material. J Endod. 1995;21(7):349–353. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80967-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Torabinejad M, Parirokh M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review--part II: leakage and biocompatibility investigations. J Endod. 2010;36(2):190–202. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Torabinejad M, Rastegar AF, Kettering JD, Pitt Ford TR. Bacterial leakage of mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling material. J Endod. 1995;21(3):109–112. doi: 10.1016/s0099-2399(06)80433-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Torabinejad M, Watson TF, Pitt Ford TR. Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate when used as a root end filling material. J Endod. 1993;19(12):591–595. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80271-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vasconcelos BC, Bernardes RA, Cruz SM, Duarte MA, Padilha PM, Bernardineli N, et al. Evaluation of pH and calcium ion release of new root-end filling materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108(1):135–139. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Vasconcelos BC, Bernardes RA, Duarte MA, Bramante CM, Moraes IG. Apical sealing of root canal fillings performed with five different endodontic sealers: analysis by fluid filtration. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(4):324–328. doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572011005000005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zakizadeh P, Marshall SJ, Hoover CI, Peters OA, Noblett WC, Gansky SA, et al. A novel approach in assessment of coronal leakage of intraorifice barriers: a saliva leakage and micro-computed tomographic evaluation. J Endod. 2008;34(7):871–875. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]