Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1995 Jan;73(1):53–60. doi: 10.1136/hrt.73.1.53

Doppler reconstruction of left ventricular pressure from functional mitral regurgitation: potential importance of varying orifice geometry.

H B Xiao 1, X Y Jin 1, D G Gibson 1
PMCID: PMC483756  PMID: 7888262

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To assess the left ventricular pressure pulse, in particular its time course, reconstructed from the continuous wave Doppler signal of functional mitral regurgitation using the simplified Bernoulli equation. DESIGN--Prospective study with simultaneously recorded high fidelity left ventricular pressure and continuous wave Doppler traces of functional mitral regurgitation, along with indirect left atrial pressure, electrocardiograms, and phonocardiograms. SETTING--Tertiary referral cardiac centre. PATIENTS--9 patients (age 60 (17) years) were studied immediately before or 1-20 h after routine cardiac surgery. RESULTS--104 cardiac cycles were analysed. There were no consistent differences between directly measured and reconstructed pressures in the time intervals from Q to + dP/dt (mean (SD) 125 (35) v 130 (35) ms and from Q to -dP/dt (389 (30) v 387 (28) ms or from Q to maximum pressure (267 (40) v 270 (40) ms, all P = NS). The time from Q to the onset of pressure rise (67 (30) v 64 (30) ms, P < 0.01) and the duration of total left ventricular systole (404 (50) v 408 (50) ms, P < 0.01) measured by the two methods were effectively identical, though the small difference was consistent enough to be statistically significant. The calculated peak pressure drop between the left ventricle and the left atrium (45-100 mm Hg) significantly underestimated left ventricular pressure (72-150 mm Hg; 70 (11) v 105 (15) mm Hg, P < 0.01) even if mean left atrial pressure (14 (4.0) mm Hg) was taken into account. Compared with those directly derived from left ventricular pressure, values of pressure measured at + dP/dt (26 (6.5) v 53 (10) mm Hg, P < 0.01) and -dP/dt (30 (8.0) v 60 (10) mm Hg, P < 0.01), and those of the rates of increase (675 (155) v 815 (155) mm Hg/s, P < 0.01) and fall (610 (145) v 845 (175) mm Hg, P < 0.01) were all significantly underestimated by Doppler. The underestimation in peak rates of pressure change could not entirely be explained by a scaling effect of absolute pressure. To investigate interrelations between the two methods throughout the cardiac cycle, reconstructed left ventricular pressure was plotted against the direct record. The plots confirmed that the reconstructed pressure was always less than directly measured pressure, the relative degree of underestimation falling as the pressure rose. This was not the effect of acceleration but probably reflects changing geometry of the regurgitant orifice. CONCLUSION--The continuous wave Doppler trace of functional mitral regurgitation is suitable for studying the timing of overall mechanical events and normalised rates of change of pressure in the left ventricle. Estimates of atrioventricular pressure drop by this method and particularly its absolute rates of change seem to be less reliable.

Full text

PDF
53

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BRAUNWALD E., DONOSO E., GRISHMAN A., SAPIN S. O. Right bundle-branch block, hemodynamic, vectorcardiographic and electrocardiographic observations. Circulation. 1956 Jun;13(6):866–872. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.13.6.866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BRAUNWALD E., MORROW A. G. Sequence of ventricular contraction in human bundle branch block; a study based on simultaneous catheterization of both ventricles. Am J Med. 1957 Aug;23(2):205–211. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(57)90194-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bargiggia G. S., Bertucci C., Recusani F., Raisaro A., de Servi S., Valdes-Cruz L. M., Sahn D. J., Tronconi L. A new method for estimating left ventricular dP/dt by continuous wave Doppler-echocardiography. Validation studies at cardiac catheterization. Circulation. 1989 Nov;80(5):1287–1292. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.80.5.1287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen C., Rodriguez L., Levine R. A., Weyman A. E., Thomas J. D. Noninvasive measurement of the time constant of left ventricular relaxation using the continuous-wave Doppler velocity profile of mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 1992 Jul;86(1):272–278. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.86.1.272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chung N., Nishimura R. A., Holmes D. R., Jr, Tajik A. J. Measurement of left ventricular dp/dt by simultaneous Doppler echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1992 Mar-Apr;5(2):147–152. doi: 10.1016/s0894-7317(14)80544-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. GLEASON W. L., BRAUNWALD E. Studies on the first derivative of the ventricular pressure pulse in man. J Clin Invest. 1962 Jan;41:80–91. doi: 10.1172/JCI104469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mason D. T., Braunwald E., Covell J. W., Sonnenblick E. H., Ross J., Jr Assessment of cardiac contractility. The relation between the rate of pressure rise and ventricular pressure during isovolumic systole. Circulation. 1971 Jul;44(1):47–58. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.44.1.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nishimura R. A., Schwartz R. S., Tajik A. J., Holmes D. R., Jr Noninvasive measurement of rate of left ventricular relaxation by Doppler echocardiography. Validation with simultaneous cardiac catheterization. Circulation. 1993 Jul;88(1):146–155. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.1.146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nishimura R. A., Tajik A. J. Determination of left-sided pressure gradients by utilizing Doppler aortic and mitral regurgitant signals: validation by simultaneous dual catheter and Doppler studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Feb;11(2):317–321. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90096-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stoddard M. F., Prince C. R., Tuman W. L., Wagner S. G. Angle of incidence does not affect accuracy of mitral stenosis area calculation by pressure half-time: application to Doppler transesophageal echocardiography. Am Heart J. 1994 Jun;127(6):1562–1572. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90387-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Xiao H. B., Brecker S. J., Gibson D. G. Differing effects of right ventricular pacing and left bundle branch block on left ventricular function. Br Heart J. 1993 Feb;69(2):166–173. doi: 10.1136/hrt.69.2.166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Xiao H. B., Lee C. H., Gibson D. G. Effect of left bundle branch block on diastolic function in dilated cardiomyopathy. Br Heart J. 1991 Dec;66(6):443–447. doi: 10.1136/hrt.66.6.443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES