Abstract
Background:
As a novel molecular markerof non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), PRDI-BF1 and RIZ homology domain containing protein 14 (PRDM14) is over-expressed in NSCLC tumor tissues. Extracellular matrix degradation mediated by the balance between matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) is one of the most important mechanism in lung cancer metastasis. This study aimed to determine if PRDM14 promoted the migration of NSCLC cells through extracellular matrix degradation mediated by change of MMP/TIMP expression.
Methods:
The expression of PRDM14 was down-regulated in human cell line A 549 after transfection with lentiviral vector-mediated short-hairpin ribonucleic acids (shRNAs) which targeted the PRDM14 promoter. Cellular migration of shRNA-infected cells was detected by a scratch wound healing assay and transwell cell migration assay. Expression levels of MMP1, MMP2, TIMP1, and TIMP2 were measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
Results:
Migration of PRDM14-shRNA-infected cells was significantly inhibited relative to control cells as measured by the scratch wound healing (P < 0.05) and transwell cell migration assays (P < 0.01). The expression of MMP1 in A549 cells infected by PRDM14-shRNA was down-regulated significantly (P < 0.01), whereas the expression of TIMP1 and TIMP2 was up-regulated significantly (P < 0.01).
Conclusions:
PRDM14 accelerates A549 cells migration in vitro through extracellular matrix degradation. PRDM14 is considered as a potential therapeutic target in metastatic NSCLC.
Keywords: Extracellular Matrix, Matrix Metalloproteinases, Neoplasm Metastasis, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Prdm14
INTRODUCTION
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80%–85% of all lung cancer cases.[1] Approximately, 25% have regional metastasis and 55% have distant metastasis were observed in patients initially diagnosed with NSCLC.[2] Despite therapeutic treatment with molecular-targeted drugs, such as target mutant erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib (EGFR) and mutant anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) (crizotinib and ceritinib), the overall prognosis of these patients is not improved and is instead associated with drug resistance.[3] As a result, new agents targeting novel molecular targets are required for the therapeutic treatment of NSCLC metastasis.
The positive regulatory domain I-binding factor 1 and retinoblastoma protein-interacting zinc finger gene homology domain containing (PRDI-BF1 and RIZ homology domain containing, PRDM) family is a novel transcription regulator containing a N-terminal positive regulatory domain, followed by six deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-binding C2H2 zinc finger domains involved in human tumorigenesis.[4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11] Recently, PRDM14, a member of the PR domain-containing family of transcription factors, was found over-expressed in NSCLC tissues and is marginally expressed in paracancerous tissues, detected by immunohistochemistry and Western blot, where the expression level was positively correlated with differentiation.[12] Interestedly, PRDM14 is mapped to chromosome region 8q13.3, which is a domain involved in tumorigenesis and cancer development.[13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24] We were supposed that PRDM14 may play an important role in the development of NSCLC. Despite this, the function of PRDM14 in NSCLC development, especially metastasis, is largely unknown.
Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), such as MMP1 and MMP2, are extracellular matrix (ECM)-degrading enzymes that function in the extracellular environment of cells to degrade both matrix and non-matrix proteins,[25,26] and their activities are regulated by tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMPs).[27] Thus, both MMPs and TIMPs are involved in lung cancer metastasis.[25]
The aim of this study was to determine the role and mechanism of PRDM14 in NSCLC metastasis by down-regulating PRDM14 expression in the human NSCLC cell line A549 using lentiviral vector-mediated small hairpin ribonucleic acids (shRNAs). We subsequently measured cell migration and MMP/TIMPs messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of PRDM14-shRNA infected cells to determine if PRDM14 promotes cell migration via extracellular matrix degradation mediated by change of MMP/TIMP expression.
METHODS
Lentiviral vector-mediated shRNAs interference
Two shRNA primers which targeted PRDM14 were designed (A: CGTCCTATGGACACTACAGAA, B: GTGGGAAATGTTTCTCTCAAT). shRNA primer annealing (100 μl): Primer F (10 μm) 10 μl, Primer R (10 μm), 10 μl, 10 × Annealing buffer 10 μl, ddH2O70 μl. Connect to viral vector: Connect system (10 μl): shRNA 4 μl, vector 2 μl, ddH2O 2 μl, 10 × T4 buffer 1 μl, Roche T4 ligase 1 μl, 24°C × 2 hours. Transfer: 5 μl viral vector production was transfer into Escherichia coli strain Genehogs (Invitrogen, Dorset, UK).
A549 cells with PRDM14 shRNA knockdown were generated using a lentiviral-mediated delivery system as described previously.[28] Briefly, double-stranded oligos were inserted into the BamHI/EcoRI site of pUCTP vector, which contains a red fluorescent protein (tdTomato) marker for cell tracking. A549 cells infected only by pUCTP vector without containing PRDM14 shRNA were set as control group (shControl). The day before transfection, 293T cells in logarithmic phase growth planted into 96-well plates at 1 × 106 cells/well. Lentiviral vectors were transfected into 293T cells together with three packaging plasmids: pGag-pol, pVSVG, and pRev. The transfection reagent protocol is followed. 293T cells were cultured for 24 hours, 0.1–0.5 μg/well of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was combined with 0.25 μl of transfection reagent. The virus supernatant was diluted by serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) medium.
Mixed shRNA lentivirus plasmids
293T cells were transfected with lentiviral plasmid/helper plasmid. Virus supernatant was collected after 48 hours and 72 hours, and then cryopreservated at -80°C. A549 cells (2500 cells per well) were seeded into 96 well plates. The lentivirus particles, produced from the transfected 293T cells, were used to infect A549 cells in the presence of 8 μg/ml polybrene. The shControl group was prepared by transfecting A549 cells with an empty vector. Ninety-six hours after infection, the knockdown efficiency was validated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
Quantitative real-time PCR
PRDM14 knockdown efficiency was validated by qPCR
qPCR primers of PRDM14 (F: TGGAGACAGACCA TACCAGTGT, R: TGATGTGTGTGCGGAGTATG) and β-Actin (F: GCATCCCCCA AAGTTCACAA, R: GGACTTCCTGTAACAACGCATCT) were designed with Primer Premier 6.0 and OLIGO Primer Analysis Software Version 7.0. Total RNA was extracted from cell lines using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Life Technologies GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany, Cat. 15596-018). Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized from 2 μg of RNA using PrimeScript™ real-time PCR (RT-PCR) Kit (TaKaRa, Cat. No.RR014A/B). qPCR was carried out using CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System (BiaRad, 185-5200, USA). All samples were analyzed in triplicate. Gene expression was calculated relative to expression of housekeeping gene β-actin and adjusted relative to expression in shControl-infected cells.
MMP/TIMP mRNA expression was detected by qPCR
qPCR primers of MMP1 (F: TCGATGCTGCTCTTTCTGAG, R: GATAACCTGGATCCATAGATCGTT), MMP2 (F: TGCTGGAGACAAATTCTGGA, R: GATGGCATTCCAGGCATC), TIMP1 (F: TTTGTGGCTCCCTGGAACAG, R: CATTCCTCACAGCCAACAGTGT), TIMP2 (F: GAAGGAGCCCCATCAATCCT, R: CTCCCATTTCTACA AGGCTCAGA) were also designed with Primer Premier 6.0 and OLIGO Primer Analysis Software Version 7.0. The qPCR protocol described above was followed.
Scratch wound healing assay
A549 cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Cells were seeded into 24-well tissue culture plate at a density of 1 × 105 cells/ml. After 24 hours of growth, the monolayer was scratched with a new 1 ml pipette tip across the center of the well. The extent of cell migration was photographed after another 24 hours (Axio Vert A1 FL, Carl Zeiss, Germany) and measured using image analyzing software (Axio CSM 700, Carl Zeiss, Germany). Each experiment was performed in triplicate.
Transwell cell migration assays
Cell migration was performed in Boyden chambers using 8-μm-pore-size polyethylene terephthalate membranes with a Falcon cell-culture insert (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA). Moreover, 2.5 × 104 cells were pre-infected by PRDM14 shRNA lentivirus in 100 μl serum-free medium were added to the upper chamber, and 500 μl medium with 10% FBS were added to the lower chamber. The filter was inserted into the lower chamber and incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. Cells on the top side of the filter were removed by scrubbing twice with cotton tipped swab moistened with PBS. Cells on the underside of the insert filter were fixed and stained for 1 hour with Crystal violet solution (Sigma, HT90132, USA) in 2% ethanol. Images were taken of five random fields of view and the cells were counted to calculate the average number of cells that migrated across the filters after 24 hours as described previously.[7]
Statistical analysis
All data was presented as mean ± standard error and analyzed by t-test using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 16.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., USA). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The correlation between indexes was also analyzed.
RESULTS
PRDM14 knockdown efficiency validation
We knocked down PRDM14 expression in human NSCLC cell line A549 using lentiviral vector-mediated shRNAs. The transfection efficiency of PRDM14-knockdown was validated by colony PCR, enzyme digestion, and qPCR; the results showed that mRNA expression of PRDM14 in A549 was down-regulated significantly relative to the shControl group (P < 0.05) [Figure 1].
Figure 1.

(a) Colony polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used after a transformation to screen colonies for PRDI-BF1 and RIZ homology domain containing protein 14 (PRDM14) short-hairpin ribonucleic acid (shRNA) plasmid. The primers used generate a PCR product of 170 bp, positive clones displayed are specific amplified bands of approximately 170 bp fragments. Marker: 600 bp/500 bp/400 bp (the brightest)/300 bp/200 bp/100 bp (from top to bottom) which give rise to an amplification product containing the PRDM14 deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequence. (b) Each fragment is selected by two positive clones and digested with KPNI restriction enzyme to generate a 2.95 Kb and 7.5 Kb fragment. Marker: 10000 bp/8000 bp/6000 bp/5000 bp/(the brightest)/4000 bp/3000 bp/2000 bp/1500 bp/1000 bp/500 bp (from top to bottom). (c) Serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) medium was used to dilute the viral supernatant. shRNA lentiviral plasmid mixture were used for viral packaging, respectively. Each gene corresponded to two hybrid viruses. 293T cells were transfected with lentiviral plasmid/helper plasmid. (d) PRDM14 silencing validation in A549 by qPCR: Messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of PRDM14 in A549 cells of shPRDM14 group was significantly down-regulated relative to the shControl group.
PRDM14 promotes A549 cells migration in vitro
The result of cell scratch wound healing assay showed the migration distance of A549 cells infected by shRNAs (194.66 ± 34.74 μm) was significantly shorter than the shControl group (270.58 ± 30.20 μm) (P = 0.0353; < 0.05) [Figure 2]. In the transwell assay, the number of PRDM14-shRNA infected cells (290.50 ± 99.21 cells/well) that migrated through the membrane was significantly less than the shControl group (562.70 ± 174.28 cells/well) (P = 0.032) [Figure 3].
Figure 2.

(a) Cells migration in cell scratch wound healing assay: A549 cells were seeded into 24-well tissue culture plate at a density of 1 × 105 cells/ml, the monolayer was scratched with a new 1 ml pipette tip across the center of the well. The extent of cell migration was photographed after another 24 hours and measured using image analyzing software. (b) Comparison bar graph: The result showed the migration distance of A549 cells of shPRDM14 group (192.02 ±26.17 μm) was significantly shorter than the shControl group (270.58 ± 30.20 μm) (P = 0.035).
Figure 3.

Cells migration in transwell assay: 2.5 × 104 A549 cells were pre-infected by PRDM14-shRNA in 100 μl serum-free medium were added to the upper chamber of Falcon cell-culture insert (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA), and 500 μl medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) were added to the lower chamber. The filter was inserted into the lower chamber and incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. In the transwell assay, the number of A549 cells of shPRDM14 group (290.50 ± 25.00 cells/well) that migrated through the membrane was significantly less than the shControl group (561.55 ±55.80 cells/well) (P = 0.032).
MMP/TIMP expression in A549 cells infected by PRDM14-shRNA
The result of qPCR showed that the mRNA expression of MMP1 was down-regulated while TIMP1 and TIMP2 were up-regulated significantly in PRDM14-shRNA group. The expression of MMP2 was comparable to the shControl group [Figure 4].
Figure 4.

As compared with shControl group (2-ΔΔct = 1.000 ± 0.010), the expression of matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1) was down-regulated significantly (2-ΔΔct = 0.597 ± 0.067; P = 0.000, < 0.01), while tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP1) (2-ΔΔct = 2.121 ± 0.113; P = 0.0002) and TIMP2 (2-ΔΔct = 5.810 ± 0.591; P < 0.0001) was significantly up-regulated in shPRDM14 group. The expression of MMP2 was comparable to the shControl group (P > 0.05).
DISCUSSION
As a transcription factor, PRDM14 plays a significant role in the maintenance of self-renewal of human or mouse emryonic stem cell identity.[29,30,31] Stem cells and cancer cells are reported to display some similar properties in self-renewal and blocked differentiation.[12] As a proto-oncogene, PRDM14 is also involved in lymphoblastic lymphoma formation.[32] and is over-expressed in human T-cell acute and hyperdiploid precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic lymphoma, which is involved in leukemia initiation.[33] PRDM14 is frequently over-expressed in breast cancers (with minimal expression in normal tissue), enhances breast cancer cells growth and reduces the susceptibility of cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drugs.[34] As a novel molecular marker of NSCLC, PRDM14 protein is over-expressed in NSCLC tumor tissues.[12] However, the functional role of PRDM14 in the progression of NSCLC is largely unknown. In this study, the migratory capacity of PRDM14-shRNA infected A549 cells were detected by a scratch wound healing and transwell cell migration assay, we found PRDM14 significantly promoted A549 cells migration in both migration assays [Figures 3 and 4], and PRDM14 may be a novel target for anti-lung cancer with metastasis.
Extracellular matrix degradation is mediated positively by the rate of in MMPs/TIMPs expression, which is a key mechanism inlung cancer metastasis.[25] To determine the relationship between migration of NSCLC by PRDM14 and MMPs/TIMPs expression, we measured the mRNA expression levels of MMP1-2 and TIMP1-2 in PRDM14-shRNA-infected A549 cells. In our study, we found that expression of MMP1 in A549 cells infected by PRDM14-shRNA was down-regulated significantly, while the expression of TIMP1 and TIMP2 was up-regulated significantly [Figure 4]. Our study suggests that PRDM14 promotes A549 cells metastasis by extracellularmatrix degradation through the up-regulation of MMP1 and down-regulation TIMP1 and TIMP2. The other cancer-associated roles and mechanism of PRDM14 should be further explored in additional studies.
Footnotes
Edited by: Li-Shao Guo
Source of Support: This study was supported by a grant from the Science and Technology Project of Huzhou City (No. 2014YZ04).
Conflict of Interest: None declared.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ettinger DS, Akerley W, Bepler G, Blum MG, Chang A, Cheney RT, et al. NCCN Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Panel Members. Non-small cell lung cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8:740–801. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:11–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Song ZB, Yu YF, Chen ZW, Lu S. Erlotinib as a salvage treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer after failure of gefitinib treatment. Chin Med J. 2011;124:2279–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jiang GL, Huang S. The yin-yang of PR-domain family genes in tumorigenesis. Histol Histopathol. 2000;15:109–17. doi: 10.14670/HH-15.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Garcia JF, Roncador G, García JF, Sanz AI, Maestre L, Lucas E, et al. PRDM1/BLIMP-1 expression in multiple B and T-cell lymphoma. Haematologica. 2006;91:467–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pinheiro I, Margueron R, Shukeir N, Eisold M, Fritzsch C, Richter FM, et al. Prdm3 and Prdm16 are H3K9me1 methyltransferases required for mammalian heterochromatin integrity. Cell. 2012;150:948–60. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Watanabe Y, Toyota M, Kondo Y, Suzuki H, Imai T, Ohe-Toyota M, et al. PRDM5 identified as a target of epigenetic silencing in colorectal and gastric cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:4786–94. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sakai I, Tamura T, Narumi H, Uchida N, Yakushijin Y, Hato T, et al. Novel RUNX1-PRDM16 fusion transcripts in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia showing t (1;21)(p36;q22) Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2005;44:265–70. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liu Y, Wu C, Lyu Q, Yang D, Albertini DF, Keefe DL, et al. Germline stem cells and neo-oogenesis in the adult human ovary. Dev Biol. 2007;306:112–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Behrends U, Schneider I, Rossler S, Frauenknecht H, Golbeck A, Lechner B, et al. Novel tumor antigens identified by autologous antibody screening of childhood medulloblastoma cDNA libraries. Int J Cancer. 2003;106:244–51. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bashyam MD, Bair R, Kim YH, Wang P, Hernandez-Boussard T, Karikari CA, et al. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization identifies localized DNA amplifications and homozygous deletions in pancreatic cancer. Neoplasia. 2005;7:556–62. doi: 10.1593/neo.04586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Liu B, Zhang S, Hui L, Qiu X, Cui Z. Relationship between the expression of PRDM14 in non-small cell lung cancer and the clinicopathologic characteristics. Chin J Lung Cancer. 2010;13:867–72. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2010.09.06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pandey RN, Rani R, Yeo EJ, Spencer M, Hu S, Lang RA, et al. The Eyes absent phosphatase-transactivator proteins promote proliferation, transformation, migration, and invasion of tumor cells. Oncogene. 2010;29:3715–22. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kindla J, Rau TT, Jung R, Fasching PA, Strick R, Stoehr R, et al. Expression and localization of the uptake transporters OATP2B1, OATP3A1 and OATP5A1 in non-malignant and malignant breast tissue. Cancer Biol Ther. 2011;11:584–91. doi: 10.4161/cbt.11.6.14533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wlcek K, Svoboda M, Riha J, Zakaria S, Olszewski U, Dvorak Z, et al. The analysis of organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) mRNA and protein patterns in primary and metastatic liver cancer. Cancer Biol Ther. 2011;11:801–11. doi: 10.4161/cbt.11.9.15176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Olszewski-Hamilton U, Svoboda M, Thalhammer T, Buxhofer-Ausch V, Geissler K, Hamilton G. Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide 5A1 (OATP5A1) in Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) Cells: possible involvement in chemoresistance to satraplatin. Biomark Cancer. 2011;3:31–40. doi: 10.4137/BIC.S7151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lemon WJ, Bernert H, Sun H, Wang Y, You M. Identification of candidate lung cancer susceptibility genes in mouse using oligonucleotide arrays. J Med Genet. 2002;39:644–55. doi: 10.1136/jmg.39.9.644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kobayashi M, Saitoh S, Tanimura N, Takahashi K, Kawasaki K, Nishijima M, et al. Regulatory roles for MD-2 and TLR4 in ligand-induced receptor clustering. J Immunol. 2006;176:6211–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.10.6211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cicek MS, Cunningham JM, Fridley BL, Serie DJ, Bamlet WR, Diergaarde B, et al. Colon CFR. Colorectal cancer linkage on chromosomes 4q21, 8q13, 12q24, and 15q22. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kasai H, Nadano D, Hidaka E, Higuchi K, Kawakubo M, Sato TA, et al. Differential expression of ribosomal proteins in human normal and neoplastic colorectum. J Histochem Cytochem. 2003;51:567–74. doi: 10.1177/002215540305100502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hsu RY, Chan CH, Spicer JD, Rousseau MC, Giannias B, Rousseau S, et al. LPS-induced TLR4 signaling in human colorectal cancer cells increases beta1 integrin-mediated cell adhesion and liver metastasis. Cancer Res. 2011;71:1989–98. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Troutman SM, Price DK, Figg WD. Prostate cancer genomic signature offers prognostic value. Cancer Biol Ther. 2010;10:1079–80. doi: 10.4161/cbt.10.11.14086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jalava SE, Porkka KP, Rauhala HE, Isotalo J, Tammela TL, Visakorpi T. TCEB1 promotes invasion of prostate cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:95–102. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li CM, Guo M, Borczuk A, Powell CA, Wei M, Thaker HM, et al. Gene expression in Wilms’ tumor mimics the earliest committed stage in the metanephric mesenchymal-epithelial transition. Am J Pathol. 2002;160:2181–90. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61166-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ming SH, Sun TY, Xiao W, Xu XM. Matrix metalloproteinases-2, -9 and tissue inhibitor of metallo-proteinase-1 in lung cancer invasion and metastasis. Chin Med J. 2005;118:69–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sun BS, You J, Li Y, Zhang ZF, Wang CL. Osteopontin knockdown suppresses non-small cell lung cancer cell invasion and metastasis. Chin Med J. 2013;126:1683–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pesta M, Kulda V, Kucera R, Pesek M, Vrzalova J, Liska V, et al. Prognostic significance of TIMP-1 in non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 2011;31:4031–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cockrell AS, Kafri T. Gene delivery by lentivirus vectors. Mol Biotechnol. 2007;36:184–204. doi: 10.1007/s12033-007-0010-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tsuneyoshi N, Sumi T, Onda H, Nojima H, Nakatsuji N, Suemori H. PRDM14 suppresses expression of differentiation marker genes in human embryonic stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;367:899–905. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.12.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ma Z, Swigut T, Valouev A, Rada-Iglesias A, Wysocka J. Sequence-specific regulator Prdm14 safeguards mouse ESCs from entering extraembryonic endoderm fates. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011;18:120–7. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chia NY, Chan YS, Feng B, Lu X, Orlov YL, Moreau D, et al. A genome-wide RNAi screen reveals determinants of human embryonic stem cell identity. Nature. 2010;468:316–20. doi: 10.1038/nature09531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dettman EJ, Justice MJ. The zinc finger SET domain gene Prdm14 is overexpressed in lymphoblastic lymphomas with retroviral insertions at Evi32. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dettman EJ, Simko SJ, Ayanga B, Carofino BL, Margolin JF, Morse HC, 3rd, et al. Prdm14 initiates lymphoblastic leukemia after expanding a population of cells resembling common lymphoid progenitors. Oncogene. 2011;30:2859–73. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nishikawa N, Toyota M, Suzuki H, Honma T, Fujikane T, Ohmura T, et al. Gene amplification and overexpression of PRDM14 in breast cancers. Cancer Res. 2007;67:9649–57. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
