Abstract
OBJECTIVE--To evaluate the difference in systolic blood pressure at the arm and ankle at rest and after various exercise tests for the assessment of aortic coarctation. METHODS--22 patients (mean age 33 years, range 17-66) were investigated on the suspicion of having haemodynamically significant aortic coarctation. Eight had undergone previous coarctation surgery, of whom five had received vascular grafts and three end to end anastomoses. The patients exercised submaximally while supine, seated on a bicycle, and walking on a treadmill, as well as exercising maximally on a treadmill. Arm and ankle blood pressure were measured with a cuff at rest and 1-10 minutes after exercise. Invasive pressures and cardiac output by thermodilution were recorded during catheterisation while patients were at rest and during and after supine bicycle exercise. The degree of constriction was assessed by angiography. Twelve healthy volunteers (mean age 32 years, range 17-56) provided reference values for cuff pressures after exercise. RESULTS--All patients with a difference in cuff pressure at rest of 35 mm Hg or more had a difference in invasive pressure of 35 mm Hg or more. Increasing severity of constriction on angiography correlated with larger pressure gradients at rest and during exercise (P < 0.0001). When cuff measurements after exercise were considered singly or combined to form a predictor they did not improve the prediction of the invasive pressure gradients at rest or after maximal exercise. A pressure gradient between arm and ankle also developed in normal subjects after maximal but not after submaximal exercise. CONCLUSION--In most patients with suspected haemodynamically significant coarctation the difference in cuff pressure between arm and ankle at rest is sufficient to select patients in need of further evaluation. If exercise is performed submaximal exercise is preferable.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Aström H., Jonsson B. Design of exercise test, with special reference to heart patients. Br Heart J. 1976 Mar;38(3):289–296. doi: 10.1136/hrt.38.3.289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borg G. A. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377–381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Connor T. M. Evaluation of persistent coarctation of aorta after surgery with blood pressure measurement and exercise testing. Am J Cardiol. 1979 Jan;43(1):74–78. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(79)90047-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Engvall J., Nylander E., Wranne B. Arm and ankle blood pressure response to treadmill exercise in normal people. Clin Physiol. 1989 Dec;9(6):517–524. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.1989.tb01005.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hanson E., Eriksson B. O., Sörensen S. E. Intra-arterial blood pressures at rest and during exercise after surgery for coarctation of the aorta. Eur J Cardiol. 1980;11(4):245–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Markel H., Rocchini A. P., Beekman R. H., Martin J., Palmisano J., Moorehead C., Rosenthal A. Exercise-induced hypertension after repair of coarctation of the aorta: arm versus leg exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986 Jul;8(1):165–171. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80108-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murray A. Contributions of medical engineering to advances in cardiology and cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1994 Jul;32(4 Suppl):S1–S2. doi: 10.1007/BF02523319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nordenfelt I., Adolfsson L., Nilsson J. E., Olsson S. Reference values for exercise tests with continuous increase in load. Clin Physiol. 1985 Apr;5(2):161–172. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.1985.tb00592.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sehested J. Differences in circadian blood pressure between upper and lower extremity in aortic coarctation patients with and without postoperative pressure gradients. Am J Cardiol. 1992 Feb 1;69(4):382–386. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90238-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wendel H., Teien D., Human D. G., Nanton M. A. Assessment of blood pressures and gradients by automated blood pressure device compared to invasive measurements in patients previously operated on for coarctation of the aorta. Clin Physiol. 1992 Mar;12(2):155–162. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.1992.tb00302.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]