Skip to main content
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1995 Mar;73(3):293–298. doi: 10.1136/hrt.73.3.293

Comparison of Doppler echocardiographic methods with heart catheterisation in assessing aortic valve area in 100 patients with aortic stenosis.

J L Fischer 1, T Haberer 1, D Dickson 1, L Henselmann 1
PMCID: PMC483815  PMID: 7727193

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To examine the practicability and accuracy of Doppler echocardiographic methods in determining aortic valve area. METHODS--Aortic valve areas determined by three methods using Doppler echocardiography (applying the continuity equation and the modified Gorlin formula using data from Doppler echocardiography and right heart catheterisation) were compared with values obtained by heart catheterisation. PATIENTS--100 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis aged between 34 and 83 years (mean (SD) 66 (10)). RESULTS--Differences in individual patients' measurements of aortic valve area by the three Doppler techniques varied by up to 0.56 cm2 compared with values obtained by heart catheterisation. On average, values obtained from Doppler echocardiographic methods lay up to 51% below and 78% above those obtained by heart catheterisation. CONCLUSIONS--All three Doppler echocardiographic methods were practicable in routine clinical practice for patients of all ages, but they were of limited accuracy when compared with the aortic valve areas found invasively using the invasive Gorlin equation. However, these deviations may not always be due to inadequacies of the Doppler methods: they could also be caused by limitations in the Gorlin formula. Doppler methods can be repeated if required, they allow examination of the morphology of the valve, and they subject the patient to considerably fewer risks than the invasive procedure. An adequate strategy in determining the severity of aortic valve stenosis would be to calculate the valve area by Doppler echocardiography as well as considering the valvar aortic pressure gradient. The valve area alone should not be relied on exclusively, as has been the increasing practice in the past few years.

Full text

PDF
293

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Agatston A. S., Chengot M., Rao A., Hildner F., Samet P. Doppler diagnosis of valvular aortic stenosis in patients over 60 years of age. Am J Cardiol. 1985 Jul 1;56(1):106–109. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90575-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berger M., Berdoff R. L., Gallerstein P. E., Goldberg E. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984 Jan;3(1):150–156. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80442-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cannon S. R., Richards K. L., Crawford M. Hydraulic estimation of stenotic orifice area: a correction of the Gorlin formula. Circulation. 1985 Jun;71(6):1170–1178. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.71.6.1170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Currie P. J., Seward J. B., Reeder G. S., Vlietstra R. E., Bresnahan D. R., Bresnahan J. F., Smith H. C., Hagler D. J., Tajik A. J. Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients. Circulation. 1985 Jun;71(6):1162–1169. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.71.6.1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Curtius J. M., Opgenorth R., Loogen F. Klinische Bedeutung der dopplerechokardiographischen Bestimmung des Schweregrades von Aortenklappenstenosen. Z Kardiol. 1987 May;76(5):269–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DODGE H. T., SANDLER H., BALLEW D. W., LORD J. D., Jr The use of biplane angiocardigraphy for the measurement of left ventricular volume in man. Am Heart J. 1960 Nov;60:762–776. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(60)90359-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. GORLIN R., GORLIN S. G. Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I. Am Heart J. 1951 Jan;41(1):1–29. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(51)90002-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grayburn P. A., Smith M. D., Harrison M. R., Gurley J. C., DeMaria A. N. Pivotal role of aortic valve area calculation by the continuity equation for Doppler assessment of aortic stenosis in patients with combined aortic stenosis and regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 1988 Feb 1;61(4):376–381. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90948-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hatle L., Angelsen B. A., Tromsdal A. Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Br Heart J. 1980 Mar;43(3):284–292. doi: 10.1136/hrt.43.3.284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hatle L. Maximal blood flow velocities--haemodynamic data obtained noninvasively with CW Doppler. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1984 Mar-Apr;10(2):225–237. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(84)90221-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hatle L. Noninvasive assessment and differentiation of left ventricular outflow obstruction with Doppler ultrasound. Circulation. 1981 Aug;64(2):381–387. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.64.2.381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hegrenaes L., Hatle L. Aortic stenosis in adults. Non-invasive estimation of pressure differences by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J. 1985 Oct;54(4):396–404. doi: 10.1136/hrt.54.4.396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Holper H., Böttcher D., Baew-Christow T., Adam W., Pfannenstiel P. Kann die moderne nicht-invasive kardiologische Diagnostik die Herzkatheteruntersuchung bei erworbenen Herzklappenfehlern ersetzen? Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1986 Feb 14;111(7):248–255. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1068435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ihlen H., Amlie J. P., Dale J., Forfang K., Nitter-Hauge S., Otterstad J. E., Simonsen S., Myhre E. Determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J. 1984 Jan;51(1):54–60. doi: 10.1136/hrt.51.1.54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kosturakis D., Allen H. D., Goldberg S. J., Sahn D. J., Valdes-Cruz L. M. Noninvasive quantification of stenotic semilunar valve areas by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984 May;3(5):1256–1262. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80185-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Krafchek J., Robertson J. H., Radford M., Adams D., Kisslo J. A reconsideration of Doppler assessed gradients in suspected aortic stenosis. Am Heart J. 1985 Oct;110(4):765–773. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(85)90455-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Oh J. K., Taliercio C. P., Holmes D. R., Jr, Reeder G. S., Bailey K. R., Seward J. B., Tajik A. J. Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Jun;11(6):1227–1234. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90286-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ohlsson J., Wranne B. Noninvasive assessment of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986 Mar;7(3):501–508. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80459-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Otto C. M., Pearlman A. S., Comess K. A., Reamer R. P., Janko C. L., Huntsman L. L. Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986 Mar;7(3):509–517. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80460-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Otto C. M., Pearlman A. S., Gardner C. L., Kraft C. D., Fujioka M. C. Simplification of the Doppler continuity equation for calculating stenotic aortic valve area. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1988 Mar-Apr;1(2):155–157. doi: 10.1016/s0894-7317(88)80099-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Richards K. L., Cannon S. R., Miller J. F., Crawford M. H. Calculation of aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography: a direct application of the continuity equation. Circulation. 1986 May;73(5):964–969. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.73.5.964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. SELLERS R. D., LEVY M. J., AMPLATZ K., LILLEHEI C. W. LEFT RETROGRADE CARDIOANGIOGRAPHY IN ACQUIRED CARDIAC DISEASE: TECHNIC, INDICATIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS IN 700 CASES. Am J Cardiol. 1964 Oct;14:437–447. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(64)90027-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schuster A. H., Nanda N. C. Doppler echocardiographic measurement of cardiac output: comparison with a non-golden standard. Am J Cardiol. 1984 Jan 1;53(1):257–259. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90723-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Segal J., Lerner D. J., Miller D. C., Mitchell R. S., Alderman E. A., Popp R. L. When should Doppler-determined valve area be better than the Gorlin formula?: Variation in hydraulic constants in low flow states. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Jun;9(6):1294–1305. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(87)80469-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Seitz W. S., Kashani I. A. Non-invasive determination of the aortic valve area in stenosis: hydraulic orifice formula for application to echocardiography and correlation with catheterization. Eur Heart J. 1983 Jan;4(1):31–40. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Skjaerpe T., Hegrenaes L., Hatle L. Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation. 1985 Oct;72(4):810–818. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.72.4.810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Smith N., McAnulty J. H., Rahimtoola S. H. Severe aortic stenosis with impaired left ventricular function and clinical heart failure: results of valve replacement. Circulation. 1978 Aug;58(2):255–264. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.58.2.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Stamm R. B., Martin R. P. Quantification of pressure gradients across stenotic valves by Doppler ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983 Oct;2(4):707–718. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(83)80311-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Teirstein P., Yeager M., Yock P. G., Popp R. L. Doppler echocardiographic measurement of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: a noninvasive application of the Gorlin formula. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986 Nov;8(5):1059–1065. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80382-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Veyrat C., Gourtchiglouian C., Dumora P., Abitbol G., Sainte Beuve D., Kalmanson D. A new non-invasive estimation of the stenotic aortic valve area by pulsed Doppler mapping. Br Heart J. 1987 Jan;57(1):44–50. doi: 10.1136/hrt.57.1.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Warth D. C., Stewart W. J., Block P. C., Weyman A. E. A new method to calculate aortic valve area without left heart catheterization. Circulation. 1984 Dec;70(6):978–983. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.70.6.978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Williams G. A., Labovitz A. J., Nelson J. G., Kennedy H. L. Value of multiple echocardiographic views in the evaluation of aortic stenosis in adults by continuous-wave Doppler. Am J Cardiol. 1985 Feb 1;55(4):445–449. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90391-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang Y., Myhre E., Nitter-Hauge S. Noninvasive quantification of the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by Doppler echocardiography. Eur Heart J. 1985 Dec;6(12):992–998. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zoghbi W. A., Farmer K. L., Soto J. G., Nelson J. G., Quinones M. A. Accurate noninvasive quantification of stenotic aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation. 1986 Mar;73(3):452–459. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.73.3.452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zoghbi W. A., Galan A., Quinones M. A. Accurate assessment of aortic stenosis severity by Doppler echocardiography independent of aortic jet velocity. Am Heart J. 1988 Sep;116(3):855–863. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(88)90348-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES