Skip to main content
Mycobiology logoLink to Mycobiology
. 2016 Mar 31;44(1):21–28. doi: 10.5941/MYCO.2016.44.1.21

New Records of Xylaria Species in Korea: X. ripicola sp. nov. and X. tentaculata

Chang Sun Kim 1, Jong Won Jo 1, Young-Nam Kwag 1, Soon-Ok Oh 1, Sle-gee Lee 2, Gi-Ho Sung 3, Jae-Gu Han 4, Junsang Oh 5, Bhushan Shrestha 3, Sang-Yong Kim 1, Chang-Ho Shin 1, Sang-Kuk Han 1,
PMCID: PMC4838588  PMID: 27103851

Abstract

During a Korean mushroom diversity survey from 2011 to 2014, we found one new Xylaria species (X. ripicola sp. nov.) and one Xylaria species that had not been previously observed in Korea (X. tentaculata). To confirm the phylogenetic placement of the new species, we conducted a phylogenetic investigation based on internal transcribed spacer regions of ribosomal DNA sequences. Additionally, the new species, X. ripicola, was subsequently analyzed for RNA polymerase II subunit sequences. We also evaluated the macroscopic and microscopic features of this species. Herein, X. ripicola is described as a new species that was collected from a natural beach habitat and X. tentaculata is formally reported as newly found in Korea.

Keywords: Ascomycota, Morphology, Phylogeny, Taxonomy, Xylariaceae


Xylaria Hill ex Schrank is the largest genus in Xylariaceae Tul. & Tul. and its members are commonly found on dead wood. Presently, ca. 300 species of Xylaria are found worldwide [1,2]. However, only seven Xylaria species were reported in Korea [X. carpophila (Pers.) Fr., X. filiformis (A. & S. ex Fr.) Fr., X. hypoxylon (L.) Grev., X. longipes (Nitschke) Dennis, X. oxyacanthae Tul., X. persicaria (Schwein.) Berk. & M. A. Curtis, and X. polymorpha (Pers.) Grev.], identified mainly based on morphological characteristics [3,4]. Molecular data have now become essential for describing new species [5,6,7]. Therefore, the modern taxonomy of Xylaria species utilizes complex combinations of phylogenetic and morphological data [2,7].

Herein, we describe two new records of Xylaria species (X. ripicola sp. nov. and X. tentaculata), which were collected during a Korean mushroom diversity survey conducted from 2011 to 2014, mainly based on the results of phylogenetic analysis of internal transcribed spacer of rDNA (ITS; barcode gene for fungi) [8] sequences and morphological investigation. In addition, one of the new species (X. ripicola) was subsequently analyzed for its RNA polymerase II subunit (RPB2) sequence to confirm its accurate phylogenetic position.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Specimens and morphological observations

Eight Xylaria specimens were deposited in the Korea National Arboretum Herbarium (KH) and their information is listed in Table 1. Among these, two specimens (KA11-0060-1 and KA11-0060-2) were collected from a saline sand beach (Myeongsasimni Beach, Bigeum-do) in Korea (Fig. 1). Macromorphological characters were determined based on field notes and colored photographs of fresh fruiting bodies. Micro-morphological characteristics of dried specimens were examined after sectioning and rehydration, which was conducted following the protocols described by Largent et al. [9]. Microscopic observations were made using an Olympus BX53 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and Jenoptik ProgRes C14 Plus Camera (Jenoptik Co., Jena, Germany). Measurements of microscopic characteristics were taken using ProgRes Capture Pro v.2.8.8 (Jenoptik Co.). Cultures were obtained by placing the tissue of freshly collected stomata on potato dextrose agar (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA). The resulting colonies were transferred to 9-cm Petri dishes containing 2% Difco oatmeal agar (OA) and yeast-malt-glucose agar (YMG) and were incubated at 23℃ under 12 hr of fluorescent light.

Table 1. Xylaria specimens examined in this study.

graphic file with name mb-44-21-i001.jpg

Fig. 1. Map of Bigeum-do, Korea, and the collection locality of Xylaria ripicola (inverted triangle).

Fig. 1

DNA extraction, PCR amplification, sequencing, and phylogenetic analyses

Total DNA extraction was conducted based on the protocols described by Kim et al. [10]. PCR mixtures contained 0.5 pmol of each primer, 0.25 mM dNTPs, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 2.5U of Taq DNA polymerase, and 15 ng of template DNA. PCR conditions for ITS were as follows: an initial denaturation step at 94℃ for 10 min followed by 30 cycles of 94℃ for 30 sec, 55℃ for 30 sec, and 72℃ for 60 sec, and a final elongation step at 72℃ for 10 min. Only the ITS regions of ribosomal DNA sequences from five specimens (KA11-0060-1, KA11-0060-2, KA12-0530, KA13-1324, and KA13-1325) were deposited in GenBank, because amplification failed for the other specimens (Table 1). For amplification of RPB2 regions of the new species (KA11-0060-1 and KA11-0060-2), we used the fRPB2-5F and fRPB2-7cR primers (annealing temperature 50℃) [11]. PCR conditions for RPB2 region were similar to those used for the ITS region with the exception of annealing temperature. The PCR products were purified and sequenced by Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Korea).

We edited raw sequences using PHYDIT 3.2 [12]. For phylogenetic analyses, DNA sequences were aligned using ClustalX 1.81 [13] with manual adjustment using PHYDIT. MrBayes 3.1 [14] was used to construct phylogenies under Bayesian inference. For Bayesian analyses, data were first analyzed with jModelTest2 software [15] to determine the most appropriate model of DNA substitution using the akaike information criterion. Posterior probabilities (PP) were approximated using the metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Two parallel runs were conducted one cold and three heated chains for 10 million generations in the ITS data set and for 3 million generations in the RPB2 data set, starting with a random tree. The trees were sampled every 100 generations. We determined that both independent runs had converged when the average standard deviation of the split frequencies dropped below 0.01. PP values below 0.95 were not considered significant, and values below 0.90 were indicated on the resulting phylograms. Maximum parsimony (MP) analysis was performed using the heuristic search option in PAUP* 4.0 [16] with the following settings: all characters were equally weighted, gaps were treated as missing characters, starting trees were obtained by random addition with 1,000 replicates, and tree bisection-reconnection branch swapping algorithm was used.

RESULTS

Phylogenetic analyses

Fig. 2 shows the results of Bayesian analysis using a GTR + I + R model of evolution for 10 million generations that was performed on the ITS dataset (including 65 taxa, 533 characters; burninfrac = 0.40). MP analysis of the ITS data resulted in four mostparsimonious trees of 1,111 steps (consistency index = 0.4365, retention index = 0.5207, homoplasy index = 0.5635, and 205 parsimony-informative). Fig. 3 shows the results of Bayesian analysis using a GTR + I + R model of evolution for 3 million generations that was performed on the RPB2 dataset (including 37 taxa, 1,046 characters; burninfrac = 0.25). MP analysis of the RPB2 data resulted in two mostparsimonious trees of 1,353 steps (consistency index = 0.2647, retention index = 0.4264, homoplasy index = 0.7353, and 435 parsimony-informative).

Fig. 2. Bayesian 50% majority-rule consensus topology based on internal transcribed spacer of rDNA sequence data. Broad black branches indicate posterior probabilities > 0.95 and maximum parsimony bootstrap support > 60% (posterior probabilities/maximum parsimony). Biscogniauxia nummularia B72C (AJ390415) and Camillea obularia ATCC28093 (AF201714) were used as outgroups. 'T' and 'epi-T' indicate sequences of the holotype and epi-type, respectively.

Fig. 2

Fig. 3. Bayesian 50% majority-rule consensus topology based on RNA polymerase II subunit sequence data. Broad black branches indicate posterior probabilities > 0.95 and maximum parsimony bootstrap support > 60% (posterior probabilities/maximum parsimony). Poronia pileiformis WSP88113001 and Podosordaria muli WSP167 were used as outgroups. 'T' and 'epi-T' indicate sequences of the holotype and epi-type, respectively.

Fig. 3

Our ITS phylogenetic trees were similar to those reported by previous Xylariaceae phylogenetic studies, indicating that this genus is paraphyletic (Fig. 2) [17,18]. Fig. 2 shows that our specimens of X. ripicola and X. tentaculata form a clade with high PP and maximum parsimony bootstrap support (MPBS) values. In case of the RPB2 tree, X. ripicola is related to X. fimbriata but is clearly distinct and is supported by PP and MPBS (1.0/70) (Fig. 3).

Taxonomic description

Xylaria ripicola

C. S. Kim & S.-K. Han, sp. nov. (Fig. 4). Etymology: Latin 'ripa' = beach, shore; 'cola' = inhabitant. MycoBank No.: MB810483.

Fig. 4. Xylaria ripicola sp. nov. A~D, Natural habit and stromata of X. ripicola; E, Stromata surface with conspicuous perithecia and ostioles (dried specimen); F, Longitudinal section showing immersed perithecia (dried specimen); G, Stromata surface; H, Perithecia section; I~L, Asci with ascospores; M, Ascospores; N, Cortical and subcortical tissue section; O, Subperithecial tissue section (scale bars: A~D = 2 cm, E~G = 1 cm, H = 200 µm, I~K, N, O = 20 µm, L, M= 10 mm).

Fig. 4

Stromata subcylindrical-fusoid, upright, solitary, scattered to gregarious but not fasciculate, usually 5~7 cm high, sometimes grows up to 10 cm, 3~7 mm thick; stipe plane to wrinkled and cracking into polyhedral plates, pale gray to blackish; head wrinkled with ostioles, unbranched, mostly spathulate but sometimes acuminate at apex, dark brown to black. Cortical layer was thick-walled and did not change color in 3% KOH. Perithecia was observed at the swollen head, immersed, subglobose to ellipsoidal, ca. 280~500 µm × 250~400 µm; ostioles conspicuously papillate, canal length ca. 70~95 µm, width ca. 60~80 µm; subperithecial tissue of textura intricate, hyaline, unchanging color in 3% KOH. Asci cylindrical, eight spores or sometimes four spores uniseriately arranged in the ascus, cuneate to tubular apical apparatus, 116~133 µm × 15.2~18.7 µm, length/width ratio 6.5~8.4 (n = 30). Ascospores brown to dark brown, smooth, ellipsoid, 18.3~21.9 µm × 10.5~12.5 µm, length/width ratio 1.5~2.0 (n = 30); germ slit with globose.

Anamorph not observed on stromata. Culture not obtained.

Habitat: Sandy beach near Carex pumila Thunb.

Known distribution: Korea.

Holotype: Korea, Jeonnam Province, Wando-gun, Bigeum-do, Myeongsasimni Beach, coll. Han & Kwag, 2 Jun 2011, deposited to KH (KA11-0060-1).

Isotype: Korea, Jeonnam Province, Wando-gun, Bigeum-do, Myeongsasimni Beach, coll. Han & Kwag, 2 Jun 2011, deposited to KH (KA11-0060-2).

Xylaria tentaculata

Ravenel ex Berk., J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 10: 381 (1869) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5. Xylaria tentaculata. A, Natural habitat of X. tentaculata; B, Mature specimen (KA14-0730); C, Swollen region at the base of the tentacle-like appendages when immature (indicated by arrow); D, Stromata surface under a microscope; E, F, Perithecia (stained with 1% phloxine and 1% Congo red solutions); G~I, Asci with ascospores; J, Ascospores; K, Conidiophores; L, Conidia; M, Sclerotium-like structures on oatmeal agar media (after ca. 3 months; KA13-1324C) (scale bars: A, B = 1 cm, C = 5 mm, D, I~L = 10 µm, E = 200 µm, F = 100 µm, G, H = 20 µm, M = 15 mm).

Fig. 5

Stromata subcylindrical, solitary to scattered, usually 2~3 cm high, sometimes grows up to 11 cm, ca. 1 mm thick, stipe dark brown to blackish but head pale gray to grayish with tentacle-like appendages (0.5~1.5 cm long). Head bearing the conidiophores, velvety; conidiophores subhyaline, lageniform to cylindrical, 11.8~16.6 µm × 3.5~4.3 µm, length/width ratio 3.0~4.3 (n = 30); conidia hyaline to subhyaline, subglobose to ellipsoid, slightly echinate, 6.2~7.6 µm × 4.8~5.5 µm, length/width ratio 1.2~1.5 (n = 30). Perithecia observed at swollen base of tentacles, immersed, globose to subglobose, ca. 500~600 µm × 350~400 µm; ostioles conspicuously papillate. Asci cylindrical, eight spores uniseriately arranged in the ascus, rectangular to urn-shaped apical apparatus, 137~162 µm × 10.2~13.1 µm, length/width ratio 11.6~14.4 (n = 15). Ascospores brown to dark brown, smooth, ellipsoid to ellipsoid-inequilateral, 20.6~24.4 µm× 8.9~10.8 µm, length/width ratio 2.1~2.6 (n = 30); germ slit with globose.

Colonies on OA and YMG usually covering a 9-cm plate after 2 months, sometimes never reaching the edge of the agar plate, and do not produce stromata, even after prolonged incubation times; mycelia on OA and YMG white, azonate, not pigmented. Sclerotium-like structure observed on OA media after ca. 3 months incubation. No conidiogenous structures observed.

Habitat: on leaf litter or on decaying wood.

Known distribution: Cuba, Korea, Mexico, Sri Lanka, and USA.

Examined specimens: Korea, Gyeonggi Province, Gwangneung Forest, coll. Han et al., 1 Oct 2013 (KA13-1324, KA13-1325; ITS GenBank Nos. KM077163, KM077164), 29 Jul 2014 (KA14-0730), deposited to KH; Jeonbuk Province, Gunsan-si, Seonyu-do, Mt. Seonyubong, coll. Han et al., 11 Jul 2012 (KA12-0530; ITS GenBank No. KM077162), deposited to KH; Jeonnam Province, Suncheon-si, Mt. Jogye, coll. Han et al., 25 Jun 2014 (KA14-0263), Gokseong-gun, Mt. Dongak, coll. Han et al., 16 Jul 2014 (KA14-0620) deposited to KH.

Culture strain: KA13-1324C (isolated from KA13-1324; deposited to KH).

DISCUSSION

We collected two unknown Xylaria species during the Korean mushroom diversity survey conducted from 2011 to 2014. One species was found on a sand beach (Myeongsasimni Beach) in Bigeum-do, Korea (Fig. 1). Previously reported Xylaria species from marine environments are mainly endophytes in trees or herbaceous plants [19,20]. Interestingly, the fruiting body of X. ripicola was collected from a sandy beach and is not endophytic. To the best of our knowledge, it is quite rare that fruiting body-producing fungi can inhabit a beach despite the saline sand. Morphologically, this species resembles X. longipes and X. polymorpha. However, X. ripicola is easily distinguished from these two species, especially by size of the ascospores, which are larger than those of X. longipes (ascospores, 13~16 µm×5.5~7.5 µm) but smaller than those of X. polymorpha (ascospores, 22~29 µm×7~9 µm) (refer to Breitenbach and Kränzlin [21]). In addition, the species is clearly distinguished by the ITS sequences (Fig. 2). In the RPB2 tree (Fig. 3), X. ripicola is related to X. fimbiriata (numerous fimbriate conidial branches on the top of immature stromata; ascospores: 7~8 µm×3.5~4 µm) [22,23] but could be easily distinguished based on the size of its ascospores and its macro-morphological characters.

The second Xylaria species, X. tentaculata, was reported unofficially by several Korean mycologists through poster presentations based on macro-morphological characteristics alone. In addition, they did not provide its sequence information (Han SK, personal communication). The morphological characters of our specimens were almost identical to the descriptions provided by Callan and Rogers [5] and Roger et al. [24]. We also confirmed the phylogenetic placement of X. tentaculata based on ITS sequences for the first time. This species is related to X. comosa (Mont.) Fr. (with morphologically similar branchlets of tentacle-like structures and anamorphic structures) and X. meliacearum Læssøe (phylogenetically related, with morphologically similar anamorphic structures) [25], but is clearly distinct in the context of morphology and phylogeny (Fig. 2) [25,26,27,28]. Interestingly, anamorphic structures are difficult to find in mature X. tentaculata, which was also mentioned by Callan and Rogers [5] and Roger et al. [24]. Additionally, this species produces sclerotium-like structures in OA medium after ca. 3 months (see Fig. 5), but we did not observe anamorphic and teleomorphic structures in culture, even after prolonged incubation times.

Morphological identification of Xylaria species is difficult, mainly because the stromata varies greatly in color, size, and sometimes in general shape [29]. However, the most recorded Korean Xylaria species were identified by macromorphological investigation alone, with the exception of X. persicaria [3,4]. Therefore, six Korean Xylaria species (X. carpophila, X. filiformis, X. hypoxylon, X. longipes, X. oxyacanthae, and X. polymorpha) need to be re-evaluated in the near future.

Xylaria species play an important ecological role because of their long co-evolution with vascular plants [2,30]. Moreover, Xylaria species are able to produce ca. 200 useful secondary metabolites [30]. Therefore, the molecular and morphological investigation of Korean Xylaria species is necessary to secure a genetic resource for utilization through accurate identification. In the near future, more intensive morphological observations, sequences analysis such as ITS sequences (barcode marker for fungi), and protein coding sequences, and additional specimen sampling is needed to improve our understanding and to determine the accurate number of Korean Xylaria species.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported by the Korea National Arboretum (Project No. KNA 1-1-10) and the research program of agricultural science and technology development (PJ008418) of the National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science.

References

  • 1.Kirk PF, Cannon PF, Minter DW, Stalpers JA. Dictionary of the fungi. 10th ed. Wallingford: CABI Publishing; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fournier J, Flessa F, Peršoh D, Stadler M. Three new Xylaria species from southwestern Europe. Mycol Prog. 2011;10:33–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Han JG, Shin HD. New record of Xylaria persicaria on Liquidambar fruits in Korea. Mycobiology. 2007;35:171–173. doi: 10.4489/MYCO.2007.35.4.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Seok SJ, Lim YW, Kim CM, Ka KH, Lee JS, Han SK, Kim SO, Hur JS, Hyun IH, Hong SG, et al. List of mushrooms in Korea. Seoul: The Korean Society of Mycology; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Callan BE, Rogers JD. Teleomorph-anamorph connections and correlations in some Xylaria species. Mycotaxon. 1990;36:343–369. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Callan BE, Rogers JD. A synoptic key to Xylaria species from continental United States and Canada based on cultural and anamorphic features. Mycotaxon. 1993;46:141–154. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Peršoh D, Melcher M, Graf K, Fournier J, Stadler M, Rambold G. Molecular and morphological evidence for the delimitation of Xylaria hypoxylon. Mycologia. 2009;101:256–268. doi: 10.3852/08-108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schoch CL, Seifert KA, Huhndorf S, Robert V, Spouge JL, Levesque CA, Chen W Fungal Barcoding Consortium. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:6241–6246. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117018109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Largent DL, Johnson D, Watling R. How to identify mushrooms to genus III: microscopic features. Eureka (CA): Mad River Press Inc.; 1977. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kim CS, Shirouzu T, Nakagiri A, Sotome K, Nagasawa E, Maekawa N. Trichoderma mienum sp. nov., isolated from mushroom farms in Japan. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2012;102:629–641. doi: 10.1007/s10482-012-9758-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liu YJ, Whelen S, Hall BD. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerase II subunit. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;16:1799–1808. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chun J. Computer-assisted classification and identification of Actinomycetes [dissertation] Newcastle upon Tyne: University of Newcastle; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:4876–4882. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:1572–1574. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. jModelTest2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 2012;9:772. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Swofford DL. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates Inc.; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tang AM, Jeewon R, Hyde KD. A re-evaluation of the evolutionary relationships within the Xylariaceae based on ribosomal and protein-coding gene sequences. Fungal Divers. 2009;34:127–155. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hsieh HM, Lin CR, Fang MJ, Rogers JD, Fournier J, Lechat C, Ju YM. Phylogenetic status of Xylaria subgenus PseudoXylaria among taxa of the subfamily Xylarioideae (Xylariaceae) and phylogeny of the taxa involved in the subfamily. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010;54:957–969. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bayman P, Angulo-Sandoval P, Báez-Ortiz Z, Lodge DJ. Distribution and dispersal of Xylaria endophytes in two tree species in Puerto Rico. Mycol Res. 1998;102:944–948. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jones EB, Sakayaroj J, Suetrong S, Somrithipol S, Pang KL. Classification of marine Ascomycota, anamorphic taxa and Basidiomycota. Fungal Divers. 2009;35:1–187. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Breitenbach J, Kränzlin F. Fungi of Switzerland. Vol. 1. Ascomycetes. Lucerne: Verlag Mykologia; 1984. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lloyd CG. Mycological notes 51. Mycol Writ. 1917;5:717–732. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ju YM, Hsieh HM. Xylaria species associated with nests of Odontotermes formosanus in Taiwan. Mycologia. 2007;99:936–957. doi: 10.3852/mycologia.99.6.936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rogers JD, Miller AN, Vasilyeva LN. Pyrenomycetes of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. VI. Kretzschmaria, Nemania, Rosellinia and Xylaria (Xylariaceae) Fungal Divers. 2008;29:107–116. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Laessøe T, Lodge DJ. Three host-specific Xylaria species. Mycologia. 1994;86:436–446. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ellis JB, Everhart BM. Synopsis of the North American species of Xylaria and Poronia. J Mycol. 1887;3:97–102. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rogers JD. Anamorphs of Xylaria: taxonomic considerations. Sydowia. 1995;38:255–262. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Vincent MA, Metcalf K. Fairy Sparklers (Xylaria tentaculata, Xylariaceae), a rarely seen fungus in Ohio. Mich Bot. 2006;45:207–209. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lee JS, Ko KS, Jung HS. Phylogenetic analysis of Xylaria based on nuclear ribosomal ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 sequences. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000;187:89–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09142.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Song F, Wu SH, Zhai YZ, Xuan QC, Wang T. Secondary metabolites from the genus Xylaria and their bioactivities. Chem Biodivers. 2014;11:673–694. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201200286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mycobiology are provided here courtesy of Korean Society of Mycology

RESOURCES