Abstract
BACKGROUND--Thrombolytic treatment reduces mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction but is associated with recurrent thrombotic events after admission, and it is unclear whether current practices of early hospital discharge are safe. Timing of first major adverse events (death, reinfarction, unstable angina, secondary ventricular fibrillation) in the early post-infarction period was studied to determine the risks. DESIGN--Follow up study. PATIENTS--608 consecutive patients (447 men and 161 women) with confirmed myocardial infarction who were admitted to the coronary care unit of a district general hospital between January 1989 and December 1991. Clinical details, including the development of left ventricular failure and in hospital adverse events, were recorded prospectively. Follow up for out of hospital adverse events was carried out by review of the case notes, postal questionnaire, and where necessary, by telephone contact with the patient and his general practitioner. RESULTS--The risk (95% confidence interval) of major adverse events in the first 10 days was 32.3% (26.3 to 39.4%) in patients with heart failure and 7.3% (5.1 to 9.2%) in those without. Smoothed estimates of the event rate in patients without heart failure decreased from 5.9 events/1000 persons/day on day 6 to 3.4 events/1000 persons/day on day 10 and 0.9 events/1000 persons/day on day 21. The corresponding cumulative risk estimates suggest that about 11 in every 1000 patients suffer a major, but often unpreventable, adverse event on day 6 or 7 after admission, and 23 in every 1000 do so between days 6 and 10. CONCLUSIONS--The point at which the risk to the individual becomes acceptably low is a matter of judgement, but the risk of a major adverse event declines rapidly after a heart attack, and particularly for patients without heart failure discharge within a few days may be appropriate. Prolonging stay unnecessarily may use resources which could be more effectively used to treat cardiac disease in other ways.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Goldstein S. Early discharge after a myocardial infarction: what's the hurry? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Dec;22(7):1802–1803. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90760-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heller R. F., Dobson A. J., Steele P. L., Alexander H. M., al-Roomi K., Malcolm J. A., Gibberd R. W. Length of hospital stay after acute myocardial infarction. Aust N Z J Med. 1990 Aug;20(4):558–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1990.tb01313.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herlitz J., Waldenström J., Hjalmarson A. Relationship between the enzymatically estimated infarct size and clinical findings in acute myocardial infarction. Acta Med Scand. 1984;215(1):21–32. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1984.tb04965.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hlatky M. A., Cotugno H. E., Mark D. B., O'Connor C., Califf R. M., Pryor D. B. Trends in physician management of uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction, 1970 to 1987. Am J Cardiol. 1988 Mar 1;61(8):515–518. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90756-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee T. H., Gottlieb L. K., Weitzman L. J., Mulley A. G., Pauker S. G., McNeil B. J. Lengths of stay of patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction at three Boston hospitals: impact of pre-discharge tactics. J Gen Intern Med. 1988 May-Jun;3(3):239–244. doi: 10.1007/BF02596338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Madsen E. B., Hougaard P., Gilpin E., Pedersen A. The length of hospitalization after acute myocardial infarction determined by risk calculation. Circulation. 1983 Jul;68(1):9–16. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.68.1.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McGovern P. G., Folsom A. R., Sprafka J. M., Burke G. L., Doliszny K. M., Demirovic J., Naylor J. D., Blackburn H. Trends in survival of hospitalized myocardial infarction patients between 1970 and 1985. The Minnesota Heart Survey. Circulation. 1992 Jan;85(1):172–179. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.85.1.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McNeer J. F., Wagner G. S., Ginsburg P. B., Wallace A. G., McCants C. B., Conley M. J., Rosati R. A. Hospital discharge one week after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1978 Feb 2;298(5):229–232. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197802022980501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pryor D. B., Hindman M. C., Wagner G. S., Califf R. M., Rhoads M. K., Rosati R. A. Early discharge after acute myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 1983 Oct;99(4):528–538. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-99-4-528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanz G., Betriu A., Oller G., Matas M., Magriñ J., Paré C., Roig E., Heras M., Azqueta M., Bosch X. Feasibility of early discharge after acute Q wave myocardial infarction in patients not receiving thrombolytic treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Dec;22(7):1795–1801. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90759-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Severance H. W., Jr, Morris K. G., Wagner G. S. Criteria for early discharge after acute myocardial infarction: validation in a community hospital. Arch Intern Med. 1982 Jan;142(1):39–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simoons M. L., Serruys P. W., vd Brand M., Bär F., de Zwaan C., Res J., Verheugt F. W., Krauss X. H., Remme W. J., Vermeer F. Improved survival after early thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. A randomised trial by the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute in The Netherlands. Lancet. 1985 Sep 14;2(8455):578–582. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)90584-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stevenson R., Ranjadayalan K., Wilkinson P., Roberts R., Timmis A. D. Short and long term prognosis of acute myocardial infarction since introduction of thrombolysis. BMJ. 1993 Aug 7;307(6900):349–353. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6900.349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]