Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1995 Sep;74(3):296–299. doi: 10.1136/hrt.74.3.296

A study of spontaneous echo contrast in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis and normal sinus rhythm: an Indian perspective.

R R Kasliwal 1, S Mittal 1, A Kanojia 1, R P Singh 1, O Prakash 1, M L Bhatia 1, N Trehan 1
PMCID: PMC484022  PMID: 7547026

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To study the incidence of spontaneous echo contrast in left atrium of Indian patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis in normal sinus rhythm and to define its relations. SUBJECTS--Transthoracic and multiplane transoesophageal echocardiographic studies were performed in 89 consecutive patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis who were in normal sinus rhythm. RESULTS--Spontaneous echo contrast in the left atrium was seen in 57.3% of patients on multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography and in only 5.6% on transthoracic echocardiography. The mean mitral valve area was 1.07 (SD 0.33) cm2 and 1.32 (0.45) cm2 (P = 0.004), mean left atrial size was 4.27 (0.67) cm and 3.91 (0.5) cm (P = 0.029), mean diastolic pressure gradient was 12.64 (5.69) mm Hg and 10 (5.5) mm Hg (P = 0.049), and absence of mitral regurgitation was seen in 45% and 23% of patients respectively (P = 0.1). Among patients with spontaneous echo contrast, 31% had either left atrial/appendage thrombus or a history of embolism, upsilon 0% in patients without spontaneous echo contrast (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS--There is a high incidence of spontaneous echo contrast in the left atrium in Indian patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis in normal sinus rhythm on multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography. These patients are likely to embolise or form thrombi in the left atrium. The presence of spontaneous echo contrast is also associated with significantly smaller mitral valve area, larger left atrium, and higher mean diastolic mitral pressure gradient.

Full text

PDF
296

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beppu S., Nimura Y., Sakakibara H., Nagata S., Park Y. D., Izumi S. Smoke-like echo in the left atrial cavity in mitral valve disease: its features and significance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Oct;6(4):744–749. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80476-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Black I. W., Hopkins A. P., Lee L. C., Walsh W. F. Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast: a clinical and echocardiographic analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Aug;18(2):398–404. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90592-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Castello R., Pearson A. C., Labovitz A. J. Prevalence and clinical implications of atrial spontaneous contrast in patients undergoing transesophageal echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 1990 May 1;65(16):1149–1153. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90330-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chandrasekaran K., Ross J., Jr, Covalesky V. A., Kresh J. Y., Mintz G. S. Two-dimensional echocardiographic visualization of turbulent intracardiac blood flow across the stenotic mitral valve. Am Heart J. 1989 Sep;118(3):625–627. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(89)90285-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cooper J. W., Nanda N. C., Philpot E. F., Fan P. Evaluation of valvular regurgitation by color Doppler. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989 Jan-Feb;2(1):56–66. doi: 10.1016/s0894-7317(89)80030-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Daniel W. G., Nellessen U., Schröder E., Nonnast-Daniel B., Bednarski P., Nikutta P., Lichtlen P. R. Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in mitral valve disease: an indicator for an increased thromboembolic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Jun;11(6):1204–1211. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90283-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DeMaria A. N., Smith M. D. Quantitation of Doppler color flow recordings: an oxymoron? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Aug;20(2):439–440. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90114-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Engle S. J., DiSessa T. G., Perloff J. K., Isabel-Jones J., Leighton J., Gross K., Friedman W. F. Mitral valve E point to ventricular septal separation in infants and children. Am J Cardiol. 1983 Nov 1;52(8):1084–1087. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(83)90537-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hatle L., Brubakk A., Tromsdal A., Angelsen B. Noninvasive assessment of pressure drop in mitral stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Br Heart J. 1978 Feb;40(2):131–140. doi: 10.1136/hrt.40.2.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoffmann R., Lambertz H., Kreis A., Hanrath P. Failure of trifluoperazine to resolve spontaneous echo contrast evaluated by transesophageal echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 1990 Sep 1;66(5):648–650. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90498-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Iliceto S., Antonelli G., Sorino M., Biasco G., Rizzon P. Dynamic intracavitary left atrial echoes in mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1985 Feb 15;55(5):603–606. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90267-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kranidis A., Koulouris S., Anthopoulos L. Clinical implications of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in mitral valve disease. J Heart Valve Dis. 1993 May;2(3):267–272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mahony C., Sublett K. L., Harrison M. R. Resolution of spontaneous contrast with platelet disaggregatory therapy (trifluoperazine). Am J Cardiol. 1989 Apr 15;63(13):1009–1010. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90163-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mitchell M. M., Sutherland G. R., Gussenhoven E. J., Taams M. A., Roelandt J. R. Transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1988 Sep-Oct;1(5):362–377. doi: 10.1016/s0894-7317(88)80013-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pollick C., Taylor D. Assessment of left atrial appendage function by transesophageal echocardiography. Implications for the development of thrombus. Circulation. 1991 Jul;84(1):223–231. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.84.1.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sigel B., Coelho J. C., Spigos D. G., Flanigan D. P., Schuler J. J., Kasprisin D. O., Nyhus L. M., Capek V. Ultrasonography of blood during stasis and coagulation. Invest Radiol. 1981 Jan-Feb;16(1):71–76. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198101000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES