Skip to main content
Royal Society of Chemistry logoLink to Royal Society of Chemistry
. 2016 Mar 24;18(15):10144–10151. doi: 10.1039/c5cp07459b

Kinetic isotope effects for fast deuterium and proton exchange rates

Estel Canet a,b,c,d,, Daniele Mammoli a, Pavel Kadeřávek a,b,c,d, Philippe Pelupessy b,c,d, Geoffrey Bodenhausen a,b,c,d
PMCID: PMC4840481  PMID: 27009684

graphic file with name c5cp07459b-ga.jpgBy monitoring the effect of deuterium decoupling on the decay of transverse 15N magnetization in D–15N spin pairs during multiple-refocusing echo sequences, we have determined fast D–D exchange rates k D and compared them with fast H–H exchange rates k H in tryptophan to determine the kinetic isotope effect as a function of pH and temperature.

Abstract

By monitoring the effect of deuterium decoupling on the decay of transverse 15N magnetization in D–15N spin pairs during multiple-refocusing echo sequences, we have determined fast D–D exchange rates k D and compared them with fast H–H exchange rates k H in tryptophan to determine the kinetic isotope effect as a function of pH and temperature.

Introduction

In the parlance of magnetic resonance, chemical exchange is a process where a nucleus undergoes a change of its environment.1 The determination of the exchange rates of labile protons can provide valuable insight into both structural and dynamic aspects of a wide range of molecules,24 such as the opening of base-pairs in nucleic acids and protection factors in protein–ligand complexes.5,6 In this paper, we shall focus on measurements of D–D exchange rates k D and their comparison with H–H exchange rates k H in tryptophan.7 The knowledge of kinetic isotope effects, i.e., of the ratio k H/k D that expresses the reduction of D–D exchange rates k D compared to H–H exchange rates k H, may contribute to the characterization of reaction mechanisms.8,9 The kinetic isotope effect can give insight into the stability of hydrogen-bonded secondary structures in biomolecules.10 In this work, we shall consider exchange processes involving labile DN deuterons and HN protons that are covalently bound to the nitrogen atom in the indole ring of tryptophan.

Experimental section

We have adapted to the case of deuterium (spin S = 1) a scheme that was originally designed to determine fast exchange rates of protons7,11,12 (spin S = 1/2) by monitoring the effect of deuterium decoupling on the decay of transverse 15N magnetization during multiple-refocusing sequences (CPMG). 13,14 The modified pulse sequence is shown in Fig. 1. The scheme requires isotopic enrichment with 15N and 13C, since the 15N coherence is excited by transfer from neighboring protons through two successive INEPT transfer steps via 1 J(13C,1H) and 1 J(15N,13C). The decay of the 15N coherence is monitored indirectly after transferring the coherence back to the proton of origin. The 15N,13C-labelled isomers of tryptophan are dissolved in either D2O or H2O to determine the kinetic isotope effect k H/k D of the following reactions:

N–D + D′+ → N–D′ + D+ rate kD 1
N–H + H′+ → N–H′ + H+ rate kH 2

where k D and k H are the pseudo-first order rate constants since the concentration of the solvent D2O or H2O, which is the source of the incoming D′+ or H′+ ions, is constant and much higher than the concentration of the solute.§

Fig. 1. (left) Pulse sequence for measurements of the indole D–D exchange rate k D. The π/2 and π pulses are represented by narrow filled and wide open rectangles respectively while wide open rectangles depict decoupling sequences. All phases are along the x-axis unless indicated otherwise. The phase cycling is: Φ 1 = 16(y), 16(–y); Φ 2 = x, –x; Φ 3 = 2(x), 2(–x); Φ 4 = 4(x), 4(–x); Φ 5 = 8(x), 8(–x) and the receiver phase is Φ rec = x, –x, –x, x, 2(–x, x, x, –x), x, –x, –x, x, –x, x, x, –x, 2(x, –x, –x, x), –x, x, x, –x. The delays are: τ 1 = 1/(4JCH) = 1.56 ms and τ 2 = 1/(4JCN) = 16 ms. The gradient pulses G that bracket π-pulses at positions 1 and 6 are of equal strength and polarity to cancel effects of pulse imperfections. The gradients applied at positions 2, 3, 4 and 5 are used to purge any undesired transverse magnetization, as the magnetization of interest is aligned with z during the corresponding intervals. (top right) Proton signals of tryptophan at pD 8.7 and T = 300 K. The red lines correspond to experiment A without decoupling while the green lines stem from experiment B with deuterium decoupling. (top) I A/I B = 0.59 with τ = 10.6 ms and n CPMG = 2. (bottom) I A/I B = 0.78 with τ = 5.3 ms and n CPMG = 4. (bottom right) Consecutive coherence transfer steps from the blue 1H to the red 15N via 13C and back in 2D, 13C, and 15N labelled tryptophan.

Fig. 1

The first and last parts of the pulse sequence in Fig. 1 lead to a transfer of the magnetization from the blue non-exchanging ‘spy’ proton to 15N and back, via the adjacent 13C nuclei, by two successive pulse sequences for Insensitive Nuclei Enhanced by Polarization Transfer (INEPT).15 The first INEPT sequence transforms longitudinal proton magnetization Hz into two-spin order 2HzCz. The second INEPT sequence converts 2HzCz into 2CzNz. WALTZ-16 proton decoupling16 is used to suppress the evolution under 1 J(1H, 13C) during the intervals of the INEPT sequences where the coherence is transferred from 13C to 15N. The antiphase coherence 2NyCz excited at the beginning of the multiple-refocusing CPMG interval decays in the course of this pulse train. At this point, two variants (A and B) of the experiments must be performed. In experiment B, continuous wave (CW) deuterium decoupling is applied during the CPMG pulse train, while in experiment A the deuterium irradiation is applied for the same duration but prior to the CPMG pulse train in order to avoid differences in temperature.

The remaining coherence 2NyCz is transferred back to the ‘spy’ proton for detection. The intensity of the resulting peak near 7.22 ppm in the proton spectra is proportional to the magnitude of the nitrogen 2NyCz coherence that remains at the end of the CPMG interval. In order to extract k D one can determine the ratio I A/I B of the peak intensities recorded without decoupling during the CPMG pulse train (experiment A) and with deuterium decoupling (experiment B). The delay τ is defined as one-half of the interval between consecutive nitrogen π-pulses. The τ delays need to be long enough to ensure that the ratio I A/I B is significantly different from 1. Typically, values of τ = 10.6 or 21.2 ms have been used. The scalar coupling is 1 J(15N,2D) = 15.4 Hz, smaller than 1 J(15N,1H) = 98.6 Hz by the factor γ(2D)/γ(1H) ≈ 0.15, but 1 J(15N,2D) is still large enough to act as an efficient vehicle of scalar relaxation.

We can construct the matrix representations of the 4 × 9 = 36 Cartesian operators that span a complete basis set for a system comprising a 15N nucleus with spin I = 1/2 and a 2D nucleus with spin S = 1.17 When a CPMG multiple echo sequence is applied to the 15N spins with an on-resonance rf field at the chemical shift of 15N, while deuterium decoupling is applied with an amplitude ωD1 at an offset Ω D with respect to the chemical shift of 2D. The rf pulses applied to the 15N spins are considered to be ideal. Starting from an operator Ny, coherent evolution leads to the following terms:18

graphic file with name c5cp07459b-t1.jpg 3

Therefore the dimension of the basis set can be reduced from 36, leaving only 9 terms:

graphic file with name c5cp07459b-t2.jpg 4

Note that in the experiments of Fig. 1, the single-quantum coherence at the beginning of the CPMG period is an antiphase operator 2NyCz. Since the presence of the Cz term affects the signal intensities in experiments A and B equally, this Cz term can be omitted without loss of generality. The solution of the Liouville-von Neumann equation19 up to the n th echo is:

σ(t = 2) = [exp(–RN·exp(–)]nσ(0) 5

The matrix representation of the Liouvillian L in the basis of eqn (4) is:

graphic file with name c5cp07459b-t3.jpg 6

The matrix representation of R N represents a πy pulse applied to the 15N spins:

graphic file with name c5cp07459b-t4.jpg 7

If the rf field for deuterium decoupling is applied on resonance, the evolution of the density operator can be described in a simplified base comprising only 6 product operators:

graphic file with name c5cp07459b-t5.jpg 8

In this reduced base, the matrix representation of the Liouvillian is:

graphic file with name c5cp07459b-t6.jpg 9

For the πy pulse applied to the 15N spins one obtains in this reduced base:

graphic file with name c5cp07459b-t7.jpg 10

In the experiment of Fig. 1, the amplitude νD1 of the continuous-wave rf field applied to the deuterium spins should be chosen carefully. The higher the rf amplitude νD1, the more efficient the decoupling, although one should avoid excessive heating. On the other hand, if the rf amplitude is too low, the ratio I A/I B is affected in a manner that can lead to erroneous measurements of the exchange rates. By way of illustration, at pD 7.7 and T = 300 K, where the exchange rate is very low (see Table 1), the ratio I A/I B has been determined as a function of the rf amplitude for τ = 10.6 ms and n CPMG = 2. For these experimental conditions, the amplitude can be attenuated as low as νD1 = ωD1/(2π) = 100 Hz without affecting significantly the ratio I A/I B. For lower amplitudes the ratio is very sensitive to the exact amplitude. An rf field with an amplitude νD1 = 3 kHz seems to be a safe value regardless of the exchange rates and can be used for all experiments. The ratio I A/I B also depends on the offset Ω D of the rf carrier with respect to the exchanging 2D spins, since decoupling becomes less efficient when the carrier is off-resonance. The ratio I A/I B has the smallest value when the carrier coincides with the chemical shift of the exchanging 2D spins, i.e., when Ω D = 0 (Fig. 2). The heteronuclear scalar coupling constant 1 J(15N,2H) = 15.4 Hz at pD 7.7 was determined experimentally from the doublet in the 2H spectrum and corresponds to the expected value 1 J(15N,2H) = 1 J(15N,1H) γ(2H)/γ(1H) with 1 J(15N,1H) = 98.6 Hz.

Table 1. Pseudo first-order exchange rate constants k D [s–1] without corrections for contributions due to quadrupolar relaxation as a function of temperature and pD.

pD 290 K pD 300 K pD 310 K pD 320 K
1.05 273 ± 21 1.05 491 ±63 1.05 697 ± 110 1.05 1670 ± 250
1.49 56.9 ± 11 1.49 65.9± 13 1.49 81.6 ± 17 1.49 91.6 ± 19
2.18 49.7 ± 4.8 2.18 47.9 ± 4.2 2.18 57.6 ± 11 2.18 61.8 ± 8.7
3.29 39.1 ± 1.9 3.29 30.2 ± 1.8 3.29 26.3 ± 1.5 3.29 23.6 ± 0.7
4.78 36.2 ± 3.0 4.78 26.2 ± 3.3 4.78 20.9 ± 2.9 4.78 16.5 ± 3.2
5.98 37.1 ± 3.1 5.98 27.1 ± 1.9 5.98 22.9 ± 1.9 5.98 18.7 ± 1.4
6.43 38.7 ± 5.7 6.43 28.6 ± 4.2 6.43 23.7 ± 3.1 6.43 19.4 ± 2.6
7.97 41.4 ± 6.4 7.69 31.6 ± 4.3 7.41 27.2 ± 3.4 7.13 23.8 ± 3.1
9.11 82.4 ± 15 8.83 88.1 ± 8.2 8.55 110 ± 11 8.27 182 ± 31
9.68 121 ± 13 9.40 328 ± 17 9.12 507 ± 24 8.84 860 ± 49
10.8 831 ± 42 10.52 1546 ± 90 10.24 2670 ± 330 9.96 4330 ± 380
12.1 3220 ± 840 11.82 8060 ± 2200 11.54 11 800 ± 2600 11.26 18 800 ± 1700
12.97 14 000 ± 3400 12.69 17 600 ± 6300 12.41 40 400 ± 11 000

Fig. 2. (top) Experimental ratio I A/I B as a function of the amplitude νD1 of the rf field applied to the deuterium spins recorded at pD 7.7 and T = 300 K with τ = 10.6 ms and n CPMG = 2. Anomalous ratios I A /I B > 1 only occur when the rf amplitude is too low, in particular in the vicinity of 1 J(15N,2H). (bottom) Experimental ratio I A /I B as a function of the offset Ω D of the carrier frequency with respect to the deuterium resonance for pD 9.4, T = 300 K, τ = 10.6 ms, and n CPMG = 2. The lines correspond to eqn (9) (top) and eqn (6) (bottom). For the blue lines, we have assumed that different operator products involving deuterium terms have distinct quadrupolar relaxation rates that depend on the spectral density. For the green lines, we have assumed that all deuterium terms have the same relaxation rate. For strong on-resonance rf fields, as we have used for the determination of exchange rates, the ratios I A /I B do not change significantly if one assumes a single or several distinct relaxation rates.

Fig. 2

All experiments were performed at 14.1 T (600 MHz for 1H, 151 MHz for 13C, 92 MHz for 2H, and –61 MHz for 15N) using a Bruker Avance III spectrometer equipped with a cryogenically cooled TXI probe. The samples were prepared by dissolving 20 mM tryptophan (fully 13C and 15N enriched) in 100% D2O buffered with 20 mM citrate, acetate, Tris or phosphate buffer depending on the pH range. We determined k H in our earlier work7 using 97% H2O and 3% D2O. The pH was adjusted by DCl or NaOD; the indicated pH values include corrections to take into account that the pH was measured in D2O with an electrode calibrated for H2O according to the following equation20

pD = pHapparent + 0.4 11

Results and discussion

For each pH and temperature, the exchange rates k D have been determined from three to seven ratios I A/I B of the signal intensities corresponding to six to fourteen experiments performed with variable numbers of π-pulses 2 ≤ n ≤ 8 in the CPMG trains, and different intervals, τ = 2.6, 5.3, 10.6 and 21.2 ms, but with the same total relaxation time 2τn CPMG. A minimum of two ratios I A/I B at different delays are required for an unambiguous determination of k D, since two rates can be compatible with a single I A/I B ratio. Fig. 3 shows how this ambiguity is lifted by changing the inter-pulse delay 2τ in the CPMG pulse train. The pseudo first-order exchange rate constants were found to lie in a range 0 < k D < 40 000 s–1, depending on pH and temperature (Table 1). At each temperature, the exchange rate k D was found to be slowest for pDmin 4.8. When the exchange rate k D is very low, one cannot neglect contributions due to the difference in relaxation rates of the in-phase 15N coherence and other rates in the relaxation matrix of eqn (6). From an earlier study of the exchange of indole protons,7 we know that the exchange rate k H almost vanishes near pHmin. On the other hand, as can be seen in Table 1, the exchange rates k D do not vanish near pDmin. Moreover, if one neglects relaxation of deuterium, some apparent exchange rates increase at lower temperatures, which is physically impossible. Hence, we incorporated a temperature-dependent quadrupolar relaxation rate R Q in eqn (12) and subtracted it from the apparent exchange rates at all pD. The use of a single constant R Q to describe the effects of deuterium relaxation is rather naive. In particular for weak rf fields or large deuterium offsets, this assumption may lead to errors. We can calculate the relaxation rates of operator products containing terms such as Dz, (3Dz 2 – 2E), Dx, Dy, (Dx 2 – Dy 2), (DyDz + DzDy) and (DxDz + DzDx).21 However, we have verified that under the conditions for which the rates of Fig. 4 were obtained, i.e., for strong rf fields and vanishing deuterium offsets, the exchange rates are barely affected if we assume that all deuterium terms have a common relaxation rate. The errors in the experimental ratios I A/I B were determined from standard deviations. The error propagation was further simulated by the Monte Carlo technique. The errors in the exchange rates k D were estimated from the curvature around the minima of χ 2 and found to lie in a range between 3 and 28%.

Fig. 3. Simulated ratios I A/I B as a function of the exchange rates k D. The curves correspond to τ = 21.2 ms and n CPMG = 2, τ = 10.6 ms and n CPMG = 4, and finally τ = 5.3 ms and n CPMG = 8, keeping the total time 2τn CPMG constant.

Fig. 3

Fig. 4. Exchange rate constants k D with corrections of Table 2 for the contributions due to quadrupolar relaxation as a function of pD over the temperature range 290 ≤ T ≤ 320 K. Solid lines result from fits to eqn (12).

Fig. 4

If the exchange rate constants k D are plotted as a function of pD on a logarithmic scale, one obtains a V-shaped curve that is characteristic of acid catalysis by D+ ions and basic catalysis by OD ions, the latter being more efficient (Fig. 4). In the cationic, zwitterionic and anionic forms of tryptophan, the exchange rates result from sums of acidic and basic contributions. The overall exchange rate constant k D can be written as:2,22

kD = kcDfc[D+]c + kzDfz[D+]z + kzODfz[OD]z + kaODfa[OD]a + RQ 12

where the rate R Q expresses contributions due to the quadrupolar deuterium relaxation to the decay of antiphase 15N coherences. The indices D and OD represent the contributions of acidic and basic mechanisms (see below) for the cationic, zwitterionic and anionic forms of tryptophan, abbreviated by c, z, and a in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. Tryptophan exists in three forms c (cationic), z (zwitterionic) and a (anionic), with mole fractions f c, f z and f a that depend on pD.

Fig. 5

The mole fractions f c, f z and f a of the cationic, zwitterionic and anionic forms of tryptophan are:f c = (1 + 10pD–pKa1 + 102pD–pKa1–pKa2)–1 f z = (1 + 10–pD+pKa1 + 10pD–pKa2)–1

fa = (1 + 10–pD+pKa2 + 10–2pD+pKa1+pKa2)–1 13

Where [D+] = 10–pD, [OD] = K W10pD. The auto-ionization constant K W of D2O depends on the temperature.23 In H2O at 25 °C, pK a1 = 2.46 for the protonation of the carboxyl group, while pK a2 = 9.41 corresponds to the protonation of the amine group. In D2O at 25 °C, we have determined that pK a1 = 2.60 and pK a2 = 10.05.24 The variation of pK a with temperature23 has been taken into account. Fig. 4 and Table 2 show the results of the fitting of the exchange rate constants k D to eqn (12), which allows one to obtain the catalytic rate constants for the contributions of acid and basic mechanisms for each of the three forms c, z, and a. The basic contribution of the cationic form and the acidic contribution of the anionic form are masked by other terms and can be neglected.

Table 2. Exchange rate constants k D and k H [s–1] derived by fitting to eqn (12).

  290 K 300 K 310 K 320 K 300 K 310 K 320 K
R Q 36.2 ± 5.6 26.51 ± 3.7 19.4 ± 9.7 16.6 ± 3.3 R Q 0.37 ± 0.03 a a
log(k cD) 2.91 ± 0.64 3.31 ± 0.27 3.49 ± 0.32 3.01 ± 1.20 log(k cH) 2.91 ± 0.04 a a
log(k zD) 3.80 ± 0.95 3.74 ± 0.64 3.70 ± 1.22 4.14 ± 0.24 log(k zH) 3.31 ± 0.05 a a
log(k zOD) 7.89 ± 0.07 8.10 ± 0.06 8.28 ± 0.03 8.41 ± 0.08 log(k zOH) 8.13 ± 0.02 8.29 ± 0.29 8.47 ± 0.41
log(k aOD) 6.64 ± 0.20 6.69 ± 0.30 6.87 ± 0.12 7.19 ± 0.19 log(k aOH) 7.53 ± 0.05 7.72 ± 0.27 7.97 ± 0.37

aProton exchange rates were not measured at these temperatures.7

The activation energy E a of the transition state provides a measure of the strength of N–D or N–H bonds.25 The activation energy E a is defined by the Arrhenius equation

k = AeEa/RT 14

where A is an empirical pre-exponential “frequency factor”, R the universal gas constant, T the temperature and k the exchange rate. The dependence of E a on pH or pD for H–H and D–D exchange processes and the activation energies and pre-exponential frequency factors are shown in Table 3 for protons and in Table 4 for deuterium.

Table 3. Activation energies E a and pre-exponential frequency factors A for the indole proton HN in tryptophan.

pH E a [kJ mol–1] ln(A)
6.3 88 ± 2 37 ± 1
7.41 84 ± 2 37 ± 1
8.31 83 ± 4 39 ± 1
9.08 82 ± 6 40 ± 2
10.01 86 ± 14 43 ± 5
10.6 94 ± 12 47 ± 4

Table 4. Activation energies E a and pre-exponential frequency factors A for the indole deuterium DN in tryptophan. The activation energies and the pre-exponential factors are strongly correlated.

pD E a [kJ mol–1] ln(A)
1.0 38 ± 17 20 ± 7
1.5 40 ± 12 20 ± 5
2.0 35 ± 11 17 ± 4
7.0 87 ± 3 35 ± 1
8.0 86 ± 8 37 ± 3
9.0 82 ± 9 38 ± 3
10.0 73 ± 14 36 ± 6
11.0 72 ± 7 36 ± 3
12.0 87 ± 23 44 ± 9

One can speak of a kinetic isotope effect when the exchange rate is affected by isotopic substitution.26 In the present case, we compare the exchange rates of indole protons in tryptophan with H2O on the one hand, and analogous exchange rates of indole deuterons with D2O on the other. The kinetic isotope effect is defined as the ratio of the rate constants k H/k D. The change in exchange rates results from differences in the vibrational frequencies of the N–H or N–D bonds formed between 15N and 1H or 2D.2729 Deuterium will lead to a lower vibrational frequency because of its heavier mass (lower zero-point energy). If the zero-point energy is lower, more energy is needed to break an N–D bond than to break an N–H bond, so that the rate of the exchange will be slower. Moreover, one expects E a to be larger for deuterium. The results in Tables 3 and 4 do not support this expectation, but if one assumes the same pre-exponential frequency factor for H and D, E a is indeed larger for the heavier isotope.

Fig. 6 shows exchange rates k D and k H at 300 K. For acid catalyzed exchange, k D/k H > 2.5 because D3O+ is a stronger acid than H3O+. For base catalyzed exchange, k D/k H < 1. However, to compare the difference between catalysis by OH and OD, we need to take into account the difference of the ionization constants: pK W(D2O) = 14.95 and pK W(H2O) = 13.99 at 25 °C.

Fig. 6. Deuterium and proton exchange rates k D (blue) and k H (red) as a function of pH or pD at 300 K. The pD scale has been corrected according to eqn (11) to take into account the use in D2O of a glass electrode designed for H2O.

Fig. 6

Fig. 7 shows the base-catalyzed exchange rate constants k D and k H as a function of pOH or pOD. The exchange rates k D are slightly lower than k H, giving the approximate kinetic isotope effects: k H/k D = 2.2 ± 0.3, 2.3 ± 0.3 and 2.1 ± 0.3 at 300 K, 310 K and 320 K respectively (Fig. 7.) These values result from averages of the exchange rate constants for the zwitterionic and anionic forms (Table 5).

Fig. 7. Base catalyzed exchange rates k D and k H as a function of pOH or pOD at different temperatures.

Fig. 7

Table 5. Kinetic isotope effects (KIE) k H/k D for the exchange rate constants of each of the three forms of tryptophan in solution: c (cationic), z (zwitterionic), and a (anionic).

  300 K 310 K 320 K
k c H /k cD 0.40 ± 0.04 a a
k z H /k zD 0.37 ± 0.09 a a
k z OH /k zOD 1.1 ± 0.1 1.0 ± 0.3 1.1 ± 0.5
k a OH /k aOD 7 ± 2 7 ± 2 6 ± 3

aProton exchange rates were not measured at these temperatures.7

In Table 5 the KIE is defined as k iH/k iD for acid catalysis or as k iOH/k iOD for base catalysis, where i = c, z, and a stand for the cationic, zwitterionic, and anionic forms of tryptophan in solution, with the heaviest isotope always in the denominator. If tunneling can be neglected, the KIE depends on the nature of the transition state. The maximum isotope effect for N–H bonds is k H/k D ≈ 9, assuming that the bond is completely broken in the transition state (TS). The KIE can be reduced if the bonds are not completely broken in the TS. The KIE can be close to 1 if the TS is very similar to the reactant (N–D bond nearly unaffected) or very similar to the product (N–D bond almost completely broken).

The experimental ratio k aOH/k aOD is near its maximum when pH > pK a2, which suggests that the N–D bond is broken in the rate-limiting step and that the deuteron is half-way between the donor and the acceptor. However the ratio k zOH/k zOD ≈ 1 suggests that the N–D bond is either only slightly or almost completely broken in the TS. The protonation of the amine withdraws electron density and increases the acidity of the HN group which favors the formation of the anionic form. This explains why k zOH/k aOH > 1 and k zOD/k aOD > 1. For the acid-catalyzed exchange constants, we observe an inverse kinetic isotope effect. This can happen when the degree of hybridization of the reactant is lower than that of the reaction center in the TS during the rate-limiting step.

The mechanisms for proton or deuteron exchange have been thoroughly reviewed.3032 Englander30 and his collaborators pointed out that the rate of the exchange of protons attached to nitrogen depends on the ability to form hydrogen-bonded complexes in the transition state involving the donor (tryptophan) and the acceptor (D2O or OD). This occurs in three steps: (i) encounter of the donor and the acceptor, (ii) formation of the transition state involving the donor and acceptor, and (iii) cleavage of the N–D bond. The mechanism of acid-catalyzed exchange consists of the addition onto the nitrogen of a D+ ion from the solvent, followed by removal of D+ by D2O (Fig. 8). The mechanism of the base-catalyzed reaction involves removing the indole deuterium to create the conjugate base, which then abstracts a D+ from D2O to regenerate the indole (Fig. 9).

Fig. 8. Acid-catalyzed mechanism of exchange. The transition state is shown in brackets.

Fig. 8

Fig. 9. Base-catalyzed mechanism of exchange. The transition state is shown in brackets.

Fig. 9

Altogether we can say that the rate-limiting step in the base-catalyzed mechanism is the removal of the proton or deuteron from the nitrogen. On the other hand, for the acid-catalyzed mechanism, is the donation of a proton or deuteron by H3O+ respectively D3O+. Finally, the curves of log k D vs. pD and of log k H vs. pH show a combination of specific base catalysis at high pH, and a specific acid catalysis at low pH, which becomes more important at higher temperatures.

Conclusions

We have adapted our method that was originally designed for measuring fast H–H exchange rates k H to the study of D–D exchange rates k. In tryptophan in aqueous solution over a range of pH, respectively pD, the kinetic isotope effect, defined as the ratio k H/k D between the H–H and D–D exchange rates, was determined at several temperatures. The dependence of the activation energies on pH provides new insight into the mechanisms of the exchange processes. The results agree with the mechanisms discussed by Englander et al. 30

Abbreviations

CPMG

Carr Purcell Meiboom Gill

KIE

Kinetic isotope effect

TS

transition state

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr Akansha Ashvani Sehgal, Dr Fatiha Kateb and Dr Roberto Buratto for valuable assistance. This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF), the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), the Swiss Commission for Technology and Innovation (CTI), the French CNRS, and the European Research Council (ERC contract ‘Dilute para-water’).

Footnotes

†Despite IUPAC recommendations, we use the notation 2D rather than 2H.

‡We use the symbol 2D when referring to isotopes as in the expressions 1 J(1H,15N) or 1 J(2D,15N).

§We shall refer to H or D for atoms that appear in molecular formulae and to HN or DN in N–H and N–D groups. For the Cartesian components of angular momentum operators, we have used Hx, Hy, Hz, Dx, Dy, Dz, Nx, Ny, Nz, Cx, Cy, Cz rather than the common notation Ix, Rx, Sx, etc.

References

  1. Bain A. D. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2003;43:63–103. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dempsey C. E. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2001;39:135–170. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hoshino M., Katou H., Hagihara Y., Hasegawa K., Naiki H., Goto Y. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2002;9:332–336. doi: 10.1038/nsb792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Persson F., Halle B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015;112(33):10383–10388. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1506079112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Guéron M., Kochoyan M., Leroy J. L. Nature. 1987;328:89–92. doi: 10.1038/328089a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Paterson Y., Englander S. W., Roder H. Science. 1990;249:755–759. doi: 10.1126/science.1697101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kateb F., Pelupessy P., Bodenhausen G. J. Magn. Reson. 2007;184:108–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2006.09.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Northrop D. B. Biochemistry. 1975;14(12):2644–2651. doi: 10.1021/bi00683a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sharma R., Strelevitz T. J., Gao H., Clark A. J., Schilknegt K., Obach R. S., Ripp S. L., Spracklin D. K., Tremaine L. M., Vaz A. D. N. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2012;40:625–634. doi: 10.1124/dmd.111.042770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Englander S. W., Sosnick T. R., Englander J. J., Mayne L. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1996;6:18–23. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(96)80090-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Segawa T., Kateb F., Duma L., Bodenhausen G., Pelupessy P. ChemBioChem. 2008;9:537–542. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200700600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sehgal A. A., Duma L., Bodenhausen G., Pelupessy P. Chem. – Eur. J. 2014;20:6332–6338. doi: 10.1002/chem.201304992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Carr H., Purcell E. Phys. Rev. 1954;94:630–638. [Google Scholar]
  14. Meiboom S., Gill D. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1958;29:688–691. [Google Scholar]
  15. Morris G. A., Freeman R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979;101(3):760–762. [Google Scholar]
  16. Shaka A. J., Keeler J. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 1987;19:47–129. [Google Scholar]
  17. Allard P., Härd T. J. Magn. Reson. 2001;153:15–21. doi: 10.1006/jmre.2001.2416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ernst R. R., Bodenhausen G. and Wokaun A., Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions, Clarendon Press, New York, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bain A. D., Berno B. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2011;59:223–244. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2010.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Glasoe P. K., Long F. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1960;64(1):188–190. [Google Scholar]
  21. Millet O., Muhandiram D. R., Skrynnikov N. R., Kay L. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:6439–6448. doi: 10.1021/ja012497y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Bai Y., Milne J. S., Mayne L., Englander S. W. Proteins. 1993;17(1):75–86. doi: 10.1002/prot.340170110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lide D. R., CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 85th edn, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  24. Krezel A. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2004;98:161–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2003.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Laidler K., King C. J. Phys. Chem. 1983;87(15):2657. [Google Scholar]
  26. Scheiner S. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2000;1458:28–42. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2728(00)00058-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Cook P. F. Isot. Environ. Health Stud. 1998;34:3–17. doi: 10.1080/10256019808036353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Westheimer F. H. Chem. Rev. 1961;3:265–273. [Google Scholar]
  29. Connelly G. P., Bai Y., Jeng M.-F., Englander S. W. Proteins. 1993;17:87–92. doi: 10.1002/prot.340170111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Englander S. W., Downer N. W., Teitelbaum H. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1972;41:903–924. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.41.070172.004351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. in Chemical Kinetics: Proton Transfer, ed. C. H. Bamford, R. G. Compton and C. F. H. Tipper, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1977, vol. 8. [Google Scholar]
  32. Eigen M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1964;3(1):1–72. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Chemistry

RESOURCES