Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1995 Oct;74(4):413–418. doi: 10.1136/hrt.74.4.413

Optimal analysis of the signal averaged P wave in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

P J Stafford 1, D Robinson 1, R Vincent 1
PMCID: PMC484049  PMID: 7488457

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To define the ability of analysis of the signal averaged P wave to identify patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) and establish whether differences in quantitative variables between patients and controls are due to concurrent cardiopulmonary disease, greater atrial dimension, or to unrelated changes in atrial electrophysiology. DESIGN--An observational parallel group study. SETTING--Cardiac department of a busy district general hospital. PATIENTS--58 participants without cardiopulmonary disease (24 with paroxysmal AF and 34 controls, group A) and 57 with cardiac or respiratory conditions (31 with paroxysmal AF and 26 controls, group B). Mean (range) age of patients was 54 (25-71) and controls 53 (34-78) for group A and 65 (45-81) and 62 (36-78) respectively for group B. Left atrial size was similar in patients and controls in each group (mean (SEM)) group A: 2.39 (0.1) v 2.19 (0.07) cm; group B: 2.51 (0.10) v 2.71 (0.12) cm). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Analysis of the P wave after P-wave-specific signal averaging. Filtered P wave duration and spatial velocity were calculated. Energies contained in frequency bands from 20, 30, 40, 60, and 80 to 150 Hz after spectral analysis were expressed as absolute values (P20, P30 etc) and ratios of high to low frequency energy (PR20, PR30, etc). RESULTS--Duration and peak spatial velocity were increased in patients with paroxysmal AF (median (interquartile range) duration group A: 144 (137-155) v 136 (129-143) ms, P = 0.007; group B: 155 (144-159) v 142 (136-151) ms, P = 0.002; peak spatial velocity group A: 16.5 (14.1-21.2) v 14.5 (11.7-18.1) mV/s, P = 0.02; group B: 18.9 (14.8-21.8) v 14.3 (12.6-17.6) mV/s, P = 0.01). Energy contained in frequency bands from 20, 30, 40, 60 and 80 to 150 Hz was expressed as absolute values (P20, P30, P40, P60, and P80) and percentage energy ratios. P30, P60, and P80 were significantly greater in patients with AF in group A (for example P60: 3.9 (3.0-5.3) v 3.1 (2.0-4.3) microV2.s, P = 0.02) and P20, P30, and P40 were increased in those with AF in group B (for example P40: 16.7 (9.9-20.8) v 10.8 (8.1-14.8) microV2.s, P = 0.02). A score developed from logistic regression analysis of duration and P60 identified patients with paroxysmal AF with a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 73%. CONCLUSIONS--Increased P wave duration and magnitude are associated with paroxysmal AF with and without additional cardiopulmonary disease. The discriminant ability of the signal averaged P wave is improved by analysis of duration and a magnitude variable. These results invite prospective assessment of the ability of the signal averaged P wave to predict paroxysmal AF in unselected patients.

Full text

PDF
413

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baciarello G., Bella R., Di Maio F., Sgrigna V., Villani M., Campbell S. V., Sciacca A. Analysis of high-resolution atrial activation: report on 403 cases. Am Heart J. 1987 Feb;113(2 Pt 1):307–315. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(87)90270-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chandraratna P. A., Hodges M. Electrocardiographic evidence of left atrial hypertension in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1973 Mar;47(3):493–498. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.47.3.493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Engel T. R., Vallone N., Windle J. Signal-averaged electrocardiograms in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter. Am Heart J. 1988 Mar;115(3):592–597. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(88)90809-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Frost L., Mølgaard H., Christiansen E. H., Hjortholm K., Paulsen P. K., Thomsen P. E. Atrial fibrillation and flutter after coronary artery bypass surgery: epidemiology, risk factors and preventive trials. Int J Cardiol. 1992 Sep;36(3):253–261. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(92)90293-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fukunami M., Yamada T., Ohmori M., Kumagai K., Umemoto K., Sakai A., Kondoh N., Minamino T., Hoki N. Detection of patients at risk for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm by P wave-triggered signal-averaged electrocardiogram. Circulation. 1991 Jan;83(1):162–169. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.83.1.162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hazen M. S., Marwick T. H., Underwood D. A. Diagnostic accuracy of the resting electrocardiogram in detection and estimation of left atrial enlargement: an echocardiographic correlation in 551 patients. Am Heart J. 1991 Sep;122(3 Pt 1):823–828. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(91)90531-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kasser I., Kennedy J. W. The relationship of increased left atrial volume and pressure to abnormal P waves on the electrocardiogram. Circulation. 1969 Mar;39(3):339–343. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.39.3.339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kawano S., Hiraoka M., Sawanobori T. Electrocardiographic features of P waves from patients with transient atrial fibrillation. Jpn Heart J. 1988 Jan;29(1):57–67. doi: 10.1536/ihj.29.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MARTINS DE OLIVEIRA J., ZIMMERMAN H. A. Auricular overloadings; electrocardiographic analysis of 193 cases. Am J Cardiol. 1959 Apr;3(4):453–471. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(59)90366-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. MORRIS J. J., Jr, ESTES E. H., Jr, WHALEN R. E., THOMPSON H. K., Jr, MCINTOSH H. D. P-WAVE ANALYSIS IN VALVULAR HEART DISEASE. Circulation. 1964 Feb;29:242–252. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.29.2.242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Opolski G., Stanisławska J., Słomka K., Kraska T. Value of the atrial signal-averaged electrocardiogram in identifying patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 1991 Mar;30(3):315–319. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(91)90009-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stafford P., Denbigh P., Vincent R. Frequency analysis of the P wave: comparative techniques. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Feb;18(2):261–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb02516.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Steinberg J. S., Zelenkofske S., Wong S. C., Gelernt M., Sciacca R., Menchavez E. Value of the P-wave signal-averaged ECG for predicting atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 1993 Dec;88(6):2618–2622. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.6.2618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sutton R., Kenny R. A. The natural history of sick sinus syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1986 Nov;9(6 Pt 2):1110–1114. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1986.tb06678.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Yamada T., Fukunami M., Ohmori M., Kumagai K., Sakai A., Kondoh N., Minamino T., Hoki N. Characteristics of frequency content of atrial signal-averaged electrocardiograms during sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Mar 1;19(3):559–563. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80273-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES