Abstract
Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) is associated with chronic inflammatory activity and disrupted insulin signaling, leading to insulin resistance (IR). The present study investigated the benefits of neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) on IR in a rat NIDDM model. Goto-Kakizaki rats fed a high-fat, high-glucose diet to induce signs of NIDDM were randomly divided into NCPB and control groups; these received daily bilateral 0.5% lidocaine or 0.9% saline injections into the celiac plexus, respectively. Following 14 and 28 daily injections, rats were subject to oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) or sacrificed for the analysis of serum free fatty acids (FFAs), serum inflammatory cytokines and skeletal muscle insulin signaling. Compared with controls, rats in the NCPB group demonstrated significantly (P<0.05) lower baseline, 60-min and 120-min OGTT values, lower 120-min serum insulin, lower IR [higher insulin sensitivity index (ISI1) and lower ISI2) and lower serum FFAs, tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-6. Conversely, NCPB rats exhibited higher basal and insulin-stimulated skeletal muscle glucose uptake and higher skeletal muscle insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) and glucose transporter type 4 expression. There were no differences between the groups in insulin receptor β (Rβ) or Akt expression; however Rβ-Y1162/Y1163 and Akt-S473 phosphorylation levels were higher and IRS-1-S307 phosphorylation were lower in NCPB rats than in the controls. These results indicate that NCPB improved insulin signaling and reduced IR, possibly by inhibiting inflammatory cytokine release.
Keywords: neurolytic celiac plexus block, Goto-Kakizaki rats, insulin resistance, insulin signal transduction pathway
Introduction
Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM or type 2 DM), the predominant form of adult-onset DM, is rapidly becoming a global public health emergency (1). Insulin resistance (IR) and pancreatic islet cell dysfunction are the major pathophysiological characteristics of the disease, leading to relative insulin deficiency and aberrant glucose metabolism (2). The development of IR is closely associated with inflammatory processes, and NIDDM is increasingly recognized as an inflammatory metabolic disorder. In NIDDM, the chronic elevation of inflammatory cytokines and free fatty acids (FFAs) disrupts insulin signaling and, ultimately, causes the degeneration of pancreatic cells (3–6). The insulin receptor (InsR)/insulin receptor substrate (IRS)/phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway is the critical homeostatic cascade linking insulin release to tissue glucose uptake (7). Increasing evidence suggests that this pathway is a target of multiple metabolic signals and inflammatory cytokines associated with obesity (8,9). This pathway is also considered to represent a key risk factor in the development of NIDDM, including its actions upon FFAs, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and the pro-inflammatory interleukins IL-1β and IL-6 (10–12). Amongst other effects, these factors cause aberrant phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of InsR, IRS and Akt; this reduces the efficacy of insulin signaling, including insulin-evoked glucose transport (4,6,7,10,11).
The celiac plexus is the body's largest autonomic nerve plexus; neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) is therefore an effective method to relieve pain, for instance in cancer treatments (13). Our previous study of NCPB in rats following resection of 70% of the liver indicated that NCPB attenuated IR; this may be due to an inhibition of systemic inflammatory response syndrome that typically occurs following severe trauma (14). NCPB may therefore slow or reverse NIDDM-associated dysfunction via the suppression of immune-mediated IR. The current study therefore measured functional and molecular changes associated with NIDDM, including oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs), insulin sensitivity, skeletal muscle glucose uptake, serum cytokines and skeletal muscle insulin signaling in the Goto-Kakizaki (GK) rat model of diabetes (15,16).
Materials and methods
Chemicals and reagents
Rat enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for measurement of FFAs, TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 were purchased from Cusabio Biotech Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). Insulin radioimmunoassay kit purchased from Tianjin Jiuding Medical Biology Engineering Co. (Tianjin, China). Tissue protein extraction solution was purchased from Pierce Biotechnology, Inc. (Rockford, IL, USA). The following primary antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Dallas, TX, USA): Anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mouse monoclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG; cat. no. sc-166574), anti-insulin receptor β (Rβ) rabbit polyclonal IgG (cat. no. sc-711), anti-p-insulin Rβ antibody (Tyr 1162/1163; cat. no. sc-25103), anti-insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) rabbit polyclonal IgG (cat. no. sc-559), anti-p-IRS-1 (S307) rabbit polyclonal IgG (cat. no. sc-33956), anti-Akt1/2/3 rabbit polyclonal IgG (cat. no. sc-8312), anti-p-Akt1/2/3 (S473) rabbit polyclonal IgG (cat. no. sc-7985-R), anti-glucose transporter type 4 (GLUT4) rabbit polyclonal IgG (cat. no. sc-7938) and goat anti-p-insulin Rβ (Y1162/Y1163; cat. no. sc-25103). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled rabbit anti-mouse IgG (cat. no. TA130002), HRP-labeled rabbit anti-goat IgG (cat. no. TA130024), HRP-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (cat. no. TA130031) and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection reagents were from OriGene Technologies, Inc. (Beijing, China).
GK rat model of NIDDM
A total of 25, 3-month-old GK male rats (weighing 305.7±18.4 g) were purchased from Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The animal experiments were approved by the Committee of Animal Care and Use within the of Chengdu Military General Hospital Command Area (Chengdu, China). Diabetes was induced using a high-fat and high-sugar diet, as previously described (17). After the first 2 weeks of the diet, fasting blood glucose (FBG) was tested weekly after an 18-h fast, using blood from the tail vein. A FBG level of >9 mmol/l was considered to indicate NIDDM. All 25 rats demonstrated tail vein FBG values >9 mmol/l at the first test.
Baseline OGTT and insulin sensitivity indices (ISI1 and ISI2) were recorded in 5 NIDDM rats (N0), and the remainder were randomly divided into two groups. The NCPB group received daily bilateral percutaneous injections of 0.5% lidocaine (1 ml/side) and control group rats received the same volume of 0.9% saline into the celiac plexus. Following the 14th (N14) and 28th (N28) injections, OGTT, IR, serum cytokine levels and the expression and phosphorylation status of insulin signaling factors in skeletal muscles were measured in 5 rats from each group.
Neurolytic celiac plexus block
Rats received 0.5% lidocaine (2 ml once/day) or saline under ether anesthesia. The puncture point was determined in accordance with a previous report (18). Briefly, rats were injected bilaterally at the first lumbar transverse process, the first bony protrusion under the root of the last rib. The needle was inserted vertically until it touched the tip of the transverse process, and was then turned medially and 70–80° vertically over the outer edge of the transverse process tip. Insertion continued until penetration was felt.
OGTT assay
Rats were administered 500 g/l glucose at 2 g/kg body mass by gavage, under ether anesthesia and following an 18-h fast. Blood samples (0.5 ml) from the orbital venous plexus were obtained at T0 (0 min), T1 (60 min) and T2 (120 min). Blood glucose was measured by the glucose oxidase method (19) and serum insulin by radioimmunoassay using the insulin radioimmunoassay kit according to the manufacturer's protocol. Blood glucose at T0 was considered to be the FBG and T0 insulin as fasting insulin (FIns). OGTT values were used to calculate the insulin sensitivity indices (ISI1 and ISI2) as previously described (13,20): ISI1 = 1/(FBG × FIns) and ISI2 = area under the curve of glucose (AUCg)/area under the insulin curve (AUCi), where AUCi = [(I0 min + I60 min)/2] + [(I60 min + I120 min)/2] and AUCg = [(G0 min + G60 min)/2] + [(G60 min + G120 min)/2].
Determination of skeletal muscle glucose uptake
Rats were sacrificed by decapitation 12 h after the OGTT test. Serum and quadriceps muscle samples for biochemical analyses were collected, which were stored at −80°C until use. A 100 mg sample of freshly isolated soleus muscle was used to determine skeletal muscle 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) uptake in each rat (14). Soleus muscle bundles were placed in Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer (OriGene Technologies, Inc., Beijing, China) with or without 1.0 µmol/ml insulin to measure insulin-stimulated and basal glucose uptake, respectively. After 1 h shaking at 37°C under 95% O2 and 5% CO2, 1.85×104 Bq 3H-2-DG and 1.5 nmol/l 2-DG (Serva Electrophoresis GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) were added and incubation continued with shaking for 30 min. Muscle samples were washed and placed in liquid scintillation vials with ethylene glycol ether (5 ml) and scintillation fluid (0.5 g 2,5-diphenyloxazole, 0.2 g phenylene benzoxazole and 1,000 ml toluene). Vials were left overnight in a darkroom. Other muscle samples were boiled prior to their use in assays, in order to correct for extracellular glucose uptake and non-specific absorption. Radioactivity was measured using a gamma counter (Wizard® gamma; PerkinElmer, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).
Serum cytokine detection
Serum samples collected prior to and following the 14th and 28th daily injections were used to detect serum levels of FFAs and the inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6, using commercial ELISA kits in accordance with the manufacturers' instructions.
Western blotting
Skeletal muscle total protein was extracted in protein extraction solution in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, and measured using the Bradford method. Extracted proteins were separated on 6% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gels at 50 µg protein per lane, and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes using semi-dry electroblotting for 1 h. The membranes were blocked in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (OriGene Technologies, Inc.); membranes were then incubated overnight at 4°C in 0.01 mol/l PBS containing an antibody against insulin Rβ, IRS-1, Akt1/2/3, GLUT4, p-Rβ, p-IRS-1, p-Akt1/2/3 or GAPDH, the gel loading control. The immunolabeled membranes were washed 3 times, 5 min/wash, with 0.01 mol/l PBS-0.02% Tween and then incubated with an HRP-labeled rabbit anti-mouse or HRP-labeled goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody, as appropriate (dilution, 1:400) for 1 h at 37°C. Following treatment with ECL detection reagents, immunoblot images were acquired and the optical density (intensity) × area (mm2) of the bands were measured using a UVP GelDoc 310 Imaging system (UVP, Inc., Upland, CA, USA). The relative target protein expression levels were estimated by the ratio of the optical density (intensity) × area (mm2) of the target band and that of the GAPDH band.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software, version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Experimental data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. All data sets were tested for homogeneity of variance (probability of error of 5%). Groups with homogeneity of variance were compared using an analysis of variance. When the heterogeneity of variance assumption was rejected, groups were compared using F-tests. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
NCPB decreases serum glucose levels in NIDDM rats
Indices of glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity and skeletal muscle insulin signaling in NIDDM model rats treated by daily neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) using 0.5% lidocaine, and control rats injected with saline were compared. Fasting OGTTs in NIDDM model rats (T0) revealed significantly lower mean FBG levels in NCPB group rats following the 14th and 28th daily NCPB (N14 and N28) compared with the first measurement prior to NCPB (vs. N0; P<0.01; Fig. 1A). By contrast, control group rats demonstrated no reduction in FBG following the 14th and 28th daily saline injection compared with N0; furthermore, NCPB-treated rats reported significantly lower FBG compared with the control, saline-treated rats following N14 and N28 (P<0.01; Fig. 1A). NCPB group rats also demonstrated lower blood sugar levels subsequent to N14 at T1 (60 min; P<0.05; Fig. 1B), and subsequent to N14 and N28 at T2 (120 min; P<0.01; Fig. 1C) following glucose gavage, compared with blood sugar readings at N0. NCPB-treated rats also reported lower blood sugar values compared with the control group following N14 and N28, at T1 and at T2 (P<0.01; Fig. 1B and C); however, it is of note that at T2, control group blood glucose levels following N14 and N28 were significantly higher than those at N0 (P<0.05). Serum insulin levels at T0 and T1 were comparable amongst all groups (Fig. 1D and E); however, the serum insulin level at T2 was significantly lower than the baseline value (N0) in NCPB rats (P<0.05 following N14; P<0.01 following N28) and lower than the control group value following N28 at T2 (P<0.05; Fig. 1F). It was therefore concluded that daily NCPB treatments enhanced glucose tolerance in NIDDM model rats.
Figure 1.
Daily neurolytic celiac plexus block enhances glucose tolerance in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus model rats. The mean concentrations of blood glucose at (A) T0, (B) T1 and (C) T2, and serum insulin at (D) T0, (E) T1 and (F) T2, measured using an oral glucose tolerance test, in the control and NCPB groups. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation at each time point (n=5). T0, 0 min after glucose gavage; T1, 60 min after glucose gavage; T2, 120 min after glucose gavage; N0, injection day 0; N14, injection day 14; N28, injection day 28; T, time; Glu, blood glucose; NCPB, neurolytic celiac plexus block. #P<0.05 and ##P<0.01 vs. N0; *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 vs. control group.
NCPB reduces IR
In the control group, the ISI1 values measured at N14 and N28 were not significantly different from that at N0. By contrast, the ISI1 values reported following N14 and N28 in the NCPB group were significantly higher than the ISI1 values at N0, and than the relevant control values (P<0.01; Fig. 2A). The ISI2 value of the control group at N28 was significantly higher than that at N0 (P<0.05; Fig. 2B). In the NCPB group, the ISI2 at N14 was significantly lower than that at N0, and significantly lower than the corresponding control group values following N14 and N28 (P<0.01; Fig. 2B).
Figure 2.

Differences in (A) ISI1 and (B) ISI2 between control and NCPB group rats. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation at each time point (n=5). N0, injection day 0; N14, injection day 14; N28, injection day 28; ISI1, insulin sensitive index 1; ISI2, insulin sensitive index 2; NCPB, neurolytic celiac plexus block. #P<0.05 and ##P<0.01 vs. N0; **P<0.01 vs. control group.
NCPB enhances baseline and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in skeletal muscle
Basal glucose uptake by skeletal muscle in control group rats decreased between N0 and N14 (P<0.05) and more so following N28 (P<0.01; Fig. 3A). By contrast, basal glucose uptake was maintained in the NCPB group rats, revealing no significant change from the N0 baseline but higher values following N14 and N28 compared with controls (P<0.01; Fig. 3A). Insulin-stimulated glucose uptake by skeletal muscle in the control group rats did not significantly change following N14, but was significantly lower than that at N0 by N28 (P<0.01; Fig. 3B). Insulin-stimulated glucose uptake by skeletal muscle from the NCPB group following N14 did not differ from baseline, but was significantly higher at N28 compared with that of the control group (P<0.01; Fig. 3B).
Figure 3.

Differences in (A) basal glucose uptake and (B) insulin-stimulated glucose uptake by skeletal muscle in control and NCPB group rats. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation at each time point (n=5). N0, injection day 0; N14, injection day 14; N28, injection day 28; NCPB, neurolytic celiac plexus block. #P<0.05 and ##P<0.01 vs. N0; **P<0.01 vs. control group.
NCPB reduces serum FFA and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels
In the control group, serum TNF-α levels were significantly higher at N14 and N28 compared with the N0, baseline level (P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively; Fig 4A). There was no significant change in serum TNF-α in the NCPB group following N14 and N28 compared with the levels at N0; however, N14 and N28 TNF-α levels were significantly lower than the corresponding control group values (P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively; Fig. 4A). Similarly, serum IL-1β levels increased in the control group compared with the N0 baseline levels (P<0.05 at N14; P<0.01 at N28), but decreased in the NCPB group (P<0.01 following N14 and N28 compared with the N0 levels); furthermore, NCPB group values were significantly lower than corresponding control values (P<0.01; Fig. 4B). Serum IL-6 levels did not change in the control group during 28 days of saline injections, but were lower in the NCPB group compared with the N0 baseline levels (P<0.05 at N14; P<0.01 at N28) and with the corresponding control group values (P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively; Fig. 4C). Control group rats demonstrated significantly elevated serum FFA levels following N14 and N28 compared with N0 levels (P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively; Fig. 4D). By contrast, serum FFA levels in the NCPB group gradually decreased and were significantly lower than the N0 baseline values following N28 (P<0.01; Fig. 4D). Following N14 and N28, serum FFA levels were significantly lower in the NCPB group compared with the respective control group values (P<0.01; Fig. 4D).
Figure 4.
Serum concentrations of (A) TNF-α, (B) IL-1β, (C) IL-6, and (D) FFAs in control and NCPB group rats. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation at each time point (n=5). N0, injection day 0; N14, injection day 14; N28, injection day 28; NCPB, neurolytic celiac plexus block; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; IL, interleukin; FFAs, free fatty acids. #P<0.05 and ##P<0.01 vs. N0; *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 vs. control group.
Expression and activation of insulin signaling factors in skeletal muscle
Expression of insulin Rβ in skeletal muscle did not differ significantly from N0 levels in the NCPB or control groups following N14 and N28 (Fig. 5A and B). However, Rβ tyrosine 1162 and 1163 dual phosphorylation, which is required for receptor autophosphorylation and insulin-induced signaling, including glucose uptake (21,22), was significantly lower following N14 and N28 in the control group compared with N0 levels (P<0.01; Fig. 5A and C). In the NCPB group, phosphorylated tyrosine 1162 and 1163 levels did not significantly decrease until N28 (P<0.01), and N14 and N28 expression levels were significantly higher than those of the control group at N14 and N28 (P<0.01; Fig. 5A and C). Expression of IRS-1, a key adaptor protein in transmission of signals from insulin receptors to Akt and other kinases (23), did not differ from baseline levels in skeletal muscle from control rats following N14 or N28, but increased significantly in skeletal muscle from the NCPB group compared with baseline and control levels (P<0.01; (Fig. 5A and D). Phosphorylation of IRS-1 serine 307, a post-translational modification associated with insulin resistance (24), was unchanged at N14 and N28 relative to the baseline levels in skeletal muscle from control rats, but decreased significantly at the two time points in the NCPB group compared with baseline levels (P<0.01) and with the corresponding levels observed in the control group (P<0.01; Fig. 5A and E). Expression of Akt in skeletal muscle did not differ from baseline values in either group (Fig. 5A and F), but Akt serine 473 phosphorylation was significantly reduced compared with baseline levels in control and NCPB groups following N14 and N28 (P<0.0; Fig. 5A and F). However, expression was significantly higher in the NCPB group compared with the control group at N14 (P<0.01) and at N28 (P<0.05; Fig. 5A and G). Finally, skeletal muscle expression of GLUT4 was significantly reduced following N14 and N28 in the control group (P<0.01), but significantly increased in the NCPB group following N28 (P<0.05; Fig. 5A and H). GLUT4 expression in the NCPB group was also significantly higher than that in the control group following N14 and N28 (P<0.01) (Fig. 5A and H). NCPB therefore partially or completely reversed numerous alterations to insulin signaling associated with IR and NIDDM.
Figure 5.
Protein expression and phosphorylation levels of muscular insulin Rβ, IRS-1, Akt and GLUT4 in control and NCPB group rats. (A) Lanes 1 and 2, protein expression or phosphorylation level in the control group at N28 and N14, respectively. Lane 3, protein expression or phosphorylation level at N0. Lanes 4 and 5, protein expression or phosphorylation level in the NCPB group at N14 and N28, respectively. (B-H) Densitometric analyses (target protein optical density/GAPDH optical density). (B) Insulin Rβ, (C) pY1162/pY1163 insulin Rβ, (D) IRS-1, (E) pS307 IRS-1, (F) Akt, (G) pS473 Akt and (H) GLUT4. N, injection day 0; N14, injection day 14; N28, injection day 28; IRS-1, insulin receptor substrate-1; GLUT4, glucose transporter type 4; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; NCPB, neurolytic celiac plexus block. ##P<0.01 vs. N0; *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 vs. control group.
Discussion
In the present study, GK rats fed a high-fat and high-sugar diet demonstrated several physiological deficits and molecular changes consistent with NIDDM, including elevated FBG levels, impaired glucose clearance, IR, reduced skeletal muscle glucose uptake and reduced expression levels of GLUT4 in skeletal muscle. In addition, dual Y1162/Y1163 phosphorylation of insulin receptor β and Akt S473 phosphorylation were reduced. Finally, this model of NIDDM was associated with elevated serum FFA and inflammatory cytokine levels. Chronic NCPB, generated by the daily injection of 0.5% lidocaine, completely or partially attenuated these changes, which suggests that NCPB may mitigate a number of the pathophysiological deficits of NIDDM, such as IR, by reducing inflammatory damage.
IR is a critical pathogenic mechanism leading to the development of NIDDM. Development of IR involves changes to insulin receptor expression, and to downstream signaling pathways (25,26). The insulin receptor is a multifunctional transmembrane glycoprotein consisting of an α subunit and a β subunit. The α subunit is responsible for binding insulin, whilst the β subunit has intrinsic tyrosine protein kinase (TPK) activity that initiates downstream intracellular signaling events (27). Numerous studies have demonstrated that diabetic hyperglycemia is associated with aberrant insulin receptor phosphorylation and reduced TPK activity (28,29). In the present GK model, insulin Rβ dual tyrosine 1162 and 1163 phosphorylation was markedly reduced. As Y1162/Y1163 dual phosphorylation is required for TPK autophosphorylation and activation, this reduction is likely to lead to decreased insulin signaling, which is indicative of insulin resistance. This IR-associated change was partially reversed by NCPB, as suggested by the OGTT results, consistent with partial attenuation of IR.
IRS-1 is an important mediator of insulin signaling (30). Insulin Rβ Y1162/Y1163 dual phosphorylation in the NCPB group was lower than baseline levels, which suggests only partial attenuation of IR, but daily NCPB significantly increased IRS-1 expression in skeletal muscle; this may compensate for the reduced insulin Rβ phosphorylation and thereby maintain skeletal muscle insulin signaling. Furthermore, insulin-triggered glucose uptake was maintained in NCPB-treated rats but lower than baseline values were reported in control group rats. Tyrosine residues 465, 612, 632, 662, 941 and 989 are the major IRS-1 tyrosine sites and are crucial regulatory sites for insulin signaling (31). Inflammatory cytokines hinder IRS tyrosine phosphorylation by activating serine-threonine kinases that, in turn, phosphorylate IRS-1 on residues, impeding interaction with insulin receptors and thereby reducing downstream signaling. TNF-α may also induce the phosphorylation of IRS-1 at serine 307 (32,33). Phosphorylation of skeletal muscle IRS-1 at serine 307 was significantly reduced following NCPB treatments, indicating that attenuated IR achieved using NCPB may be associated with the decreased phosphorylation of IRS-1 serine 307.
Akt is a serine/threonine protein kinase and downstream target of PI3K (34). Under the action of insulin, PI3K activation produces phosphatidylinositol 3,4-bisphosphate and phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate, which promote phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1-mediated phosphorylation, activating Akt (35). Akt has two phosphorylation sites, serine 473 and threonine 308, and Akt is completely activated only when the two sites are phosphorylated (36). NCPB treatment did not affect Akt expression levels, but did partially reverse the reduced phosphorylation at serine 473 in control GK rats. Phosphorylated Akt may regulate insulin metabolism by controlling GLUT translocation (37) and NCPB may therefore maintain skeletal muscle glucose uptake by sustaining Akt activity. As a polar molecule, glucose must be transported into cells across the cell membrane by GLUTs in the majority of tissues, with the exception of cells in the small intestine and the renal tubules (38,39). GLUT4 is an insulin-dependent glucose transporter that is only expressed in insulin-sensitive tissues, such as skeletal muscle, cardiac muscle and adipose tissue. GLUT4-mediated glucose transport is the rate-limiting step in glucose utilization in peripheral tissues such as fat and muscle. Reduced expression or translocation of GLUT4 impairs glucose utilization in peripheral tissues, thereby causing IR (40). In the adipocytes of patients with NIDDM and obese individuals, GLUT4 expression is significantly reduced (41) and, whilst total skeletal muscle GLUT4 expression is normal, defects occur in GLUT4 translocation to the membrane (42). In the current study, GLUT4 expression in skeletal muscle was significantly increased by NCPB, possibly by maintenance of Akt phospho-activation and sustained membrane translocation, which is consistent with maintenance of skeletal muscle glucose uptake and improved glucose clearance in NCPB-treated rats.
Inflammation is a central pathogenic mechanism in the development of IR and type 2 diabetes (43–46). Obesity, a key risk factor for NIDDM, is associated with chronic inflammation and the release of inflammatory mediators such as TNF-α from adipose tissue; these inflammatory components may subsequently reduce insulin signaling and insulin-evoked glucose uptake into skeletal muscle, and may also damage insulin-producing pancreatic β cells (3–6,11,12,43–46). As observed, TNF-α interferes with insulin receptor downstream signaling by phosphorylating IRS-1 at serine 307, resulting in reduced PI3K/Akt activity and GLUT4 translocation (32,33,47–49). In addition, TNF-α also directly inhibits GLUT4 mRNA expression (50–52). Furthermore, TNF-α directly inhibits adipocyte differentiation and accelerates the decomposition of fat, resulting in increased serum FFA levels (53,54), which can cause IR by PKC-θ-mediated IRS-1 serine 307 phosphorylation (55). TNF-α may also indirectly affect insulin signaling by stimulating the secretion of glucocorticoids, glucagon and catecholamines (56). In the present study, NCPB treatment reduced serum FFA and TNF-α levels, which may have contributed to the reduction in IR.
IL-1β can also induce IR by interfering with insulin signaling. Activation of IL-1R induces the secretion and release of other pro-inflammatory cytokines by activating inhibitor of nuclear factor (NF)-κB kinase β subunit and NF-κB. Inhibitor of NF-κB kinase β subunit additionally prevents the association of InR and IRS, thereby terminating insulin signaling to PI3K, by phosphorylating IRS-1 at serine 307 (24,57). Furthermore, IL-1β can phosphorylate IRS-1 serine 307 through the activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinases (33), increase the expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) (58), thereby inhibiting insulin receptor-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS, and promote IRS-1/2 degradation through the competitive tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin receptor tyrosine 960 (59). IL-1β also decreases GLUT4 gene expression, shortens GLUT4 mRNA half-life (60) and reduces transmembrane GLUT4 transport by attenuating Akt activity (61). IL-1β can additionally decrease IRS-1 mRNA levels via the activation of extracellular signaling regulatory kinases (62), and may phosphorylate serine 24 of the IRS-1 pleckstrin homology domain to reduce its tyrosine phosphorylation (63). The increase in serum IL-1β levels observed in control GK rats was markedly inhibited by NCPB in the current study, possibly contributing to the reduced IR observed in the NCPB-treated GK rats. IL-6 has previously been reported to reduce insulin receptor expression, IRS expression, IRS tyrosine phosphorylation, Akt activation and GLUT4 expression (64,65) and to induce SOCS expression through the Janus kinase/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription signaling pathway to suppress insulin signaling. Similarly to IL-1β and TNF-α, serum levels of IL-6 were significantly decreased following NCPB in the present study, which may have contributed to the alleviation of IR.
Serum FFAs may interfere with multiple aspects of insulin signaling. In a previous study using transgenic mice, elevated FFAs reduced IRS-2 expression, IRS-2 phosphorylation, PI3K activity and GLUT2 expression in liver cells (66); the reduction in IR resulting from NCPB treatments observed in the present study may therefore have resulted in part from reduced serum FFA levels.
The analgesic effect of NCPB is hypothesized to depend on a reduction in the response of the sympathetic nervous system and inhibition of catecholamine release. These effects may also be involved in the reduction of serum FFA and inflammatory cytokine secretion, although this requires additional study. Whilst the mechanisms behind NCPB have yet to be elucidated, it is evident that NCPB can attenuate IR in GK rats by improving insulin signaling and enhancing glucose uptake, suggesting that NCPB may be a feasible treatment for NIDDM. Clinical studies are necessary to test the efficacy of this potential therapeutic in patients with NIDDM.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Open Foundation of Development and Regeneration Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province (grant no. 12z058), the Hospital Foundation of General Hospital of Chengdu Military Command Area (grant no. 2013YG-B010) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81171869/H2101).
References
- 1.Chen L, Magliano DJ, Zimmet PZ. The worldwide epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus - present and future perspectives. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011;8:228–236. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2011.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Brunetti A, Chiefari E, Foti D. Recent advances in the molecular genetics of type 2 diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes. 2014;5:128–140. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v5.i2.128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Montane J, Cadavez L, Novials A. Stress and the inflammatory process: A major cause of pancreatic cell death in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2014;7:25–34. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S37649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mandrup-Poulsen T. Type 2 diabetes mellitus: A metabolic autoinflammatory disease. Dermatol Clin. 2013;31:495–506. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2013.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Eguchi K, Manabe I. Macrophages and islet inflammation in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15(Suppl 3):152–158. doi: 10.1111/dom.12168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Richardson VR, Smith KA, Carter AM. Adipose tissue inflammation: Feeding the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Immunobiology. 2013;218:1497–1504. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2013.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mackenzie RW, Elliott BT. Akt/PKB activation and insulin signaling: A novel insulin signaling pathway in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2014;7:55–64. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S48260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McPhee JB, Schertzer JD. Immunometabolism of obesity and diabetes: Microbiota link compartmentalized immunity in the gut tometabolic tissue inflammation. Clin Sci (Lond) 2015;129:1083–1096. doi: 10.1042/CS20150431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tanti JF, Ceppo F, Jager J, Berthou F. Implication of inflammatory signaling pathways in obesity-induced insulin resistance. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2013;8:181. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2012.00181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jaiswal N, Gunaganti N, Maurya CK, Narender T, Tamrakar AK. Free fatty acid induced impairment of insulin signaling is prevented by the diastereomeric mixture of calophyllic acid and isocalophyllic acid in skeletal muscle cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 2015;746:70–77. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.10.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Luo C, Yang H, Tang C, Yao G, Kong L, He H, Zhou Y. Kaempferol alleviates insulin resistance via hepatic IKK/NF-κB signal in type 2 diabetic rats. Int Immunopharmacol. 2015;28:744–750. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2015.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.McCall KD, Holliday D, Dickerson E, Wallace B, Schwartz AL, Schwartz C, Lewis CJ, Kohn LD, Schwartz FL. Phenylmethimazole blocks palmitate-mediated induction of inflammatory cytokine pathways in 3T3L1 adipocytes and RAW 264.7 macrophages. J Endocrinol. 2010;207:343–353. doi: 10.1677/JOE-09-0370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yang FR, Wu BS, Lai GH, Wang Q, Yang LQ, He MW, Ni JX. Assessment of consecutive neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) technique outcomes in the management of refractory visceral cancer pain. Pain Med. 2012;13:518–521. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01332.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li J, Wei XH, Lin L, Che JX, Qiu QM, Zuo HT, An H, Liu YH, Bai SR, Tian FZ. Effect of neurolytic celiac plexus block on insulin resistance after partial hepatectomy in rats. Zhongguo Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2013;33:1124–1126. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- 15.Akash MS, Rehman K, Chen S. Goto-Kakizaki rats: Its suitability as non-obese diabetic animal model for spontaneous type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2013;9:387–396. doi: 10.2174/15733998113099990069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Portha B, Giroix MH, Tourrel-Cuzin C, Le-Stunff H, Movassat J. The GK rat: A prototype for the study of non-overweight type 2 diabetes. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;933:125–159. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-068-7_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chen R, Wang L, Cao HW, Tang CW, Bai XZ, Ji QH. Expression of GLP-1 receptor mRNA in intestine and pancreas of diabetic rats. Di 4 Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao. 2008;29:1235–1238. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- 18.Li J, Yan HT, Che JX, Bai SR, Qiu QM, Ren L, Pan F, Sun XQ, Tian FZ, Li DX, Tang LJ. Effects of neurolytic celiac plexus block on liver regeneration in rats with partial hepatectomy. PLoS One. 2013;8:e73101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wincey C, Marks V. A micro-method for measuring glucose using the autoanalyzer and glucose-oxidase. J Clin Pathol. 1961;14:558–559. doi: 10.1136/jcp.14.5.558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Banerji MA, Chaiken RL, Gordon D, Kral JG, Lebovitz HE. Does intra-abdominal adipose tissue in black men determine whether NIDDM is insulin-resistant or insulin-sensitive? Diabetes. 1995;44:141–146. doi: 10.2337/diab.44.2.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ellis L, Clauser E, Morgan DO, Edery M, Roth RA, Rutter WJ. Replacement of insulin receptor tyrosine residues 1162 and 1163 compromises insulin-stimulated kinase activity and uptake of 2-deoxyglucose. Cell. 1986;45:721–732. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90786-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cherqui G, Reynet C, Caron M, Melin B, Wicek D, Clauser E, Capeau J, Picard J. Insulin receptor tyrosine residues 1162 and 1163 control insulin stimulation of myristoyl-diacylglycerol generation and subsequent activation of glucose transport. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:21254–21261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Virkamäki A, Ueki K, Kahn CR. Protein-protein interaction in insulin signaling and the molecular mechanisms of insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 1999;103:931–943. doi: 10.1172/JCI6609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Aguirre V, Werner ED, Giraud J, Lee YH, Shoelson SE, White MF. Phosphorylation of Ser307 in insulin receptor substrate-1 blocks interactions with the insulin receptor and inhibits insulin action. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:1531–1537. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M101521200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hsueh WA, Buchanan TA. Obesity and hypertension. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1994;23:405–427. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Elmendorf JS, Damrau-Abney A, Smith TR, David TS, Turinsky J. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and dynamics of insulin resistance in denervated slow and fast muscles in vivo. Am J Physiol. 1997;272:E661–E670. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1997.272.4.E661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee J, Pilch PF. The insulin receptor: Structure, function and signaling. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:C319–C334. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1994.266.2.C319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kobayashi M, Iwanishi M, Egawa K, Shigeta Y. Pioglitazone increases insulin sensitivity by activating insulin receptor kinase. Diabetes. 1992;41:476–483. doi: 10.2337/diab.41.4.476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ola MS. Effect of hyperglycemia on insulin receptor signaling in the cultured retinal Müller glial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;444:264–269. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.01.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fasshauer M, Klein J, Kriauciunas KM, Ueki K, Benito M, Kahn CR. Essential role of insulin receptor substrate 1 in differentiation of brown adipocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:319–329. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.1.319-329.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lehr S, Kotzka J, Herkner A, Sikmann A, Meyer HE, Krone W, Müller-Wieland D. Identification of major tyrosine phosphorylation sites in the human insulin receptor substrate Gab-1 by insulin receptor kinase in vitro. Biochemistry. 2000;39:10898–10907. doi: 10.1021/bi000982k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hotamisligil GS, Peraldi P, Budavari A, Ellis R, White MF, Spiegelman BM. IRS-1-mediated inhibition of insulin receptor tyrosine kinase activity in TNF-alpha- and obesity-induced insulin resistance. Science. 1996;271:665–668. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5249.665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Aguirre V, Uchida T, Yenush L, Davis R, White MF. The c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase promotes insulin resistance during association with insulin receptor substrate-1 and phosphorylation of Ser (307) J Biol Chem. 2000;275:9047–9054. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.12.9047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Anderson KE, Coadwell J, Stephens LR, Hawkins PT. Translocation of PDK-1 to the plasma membrane is important in allowing PDK-1 to activate protein kinase B. Curr Biol. 1998;8:684–691. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70274-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cao S, Li B, Yi X, Chang B, Zhu B, Lian Z, Zhang Z, Zhao G, Liu H, Zhang H. Effects of exercise on AMPK signaling and downstream components to PI3K in rat with type 2 diabetes. PLoS One. 2012;7:e51709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.He L, Simmen FA, Mehendale HM, Ronis MJ, Badger TM. Chronic ethanol intake impairs insulin signaling in rats by disrupting Akt association with the cell membrane. Role of TRB3 in inhibition of Akt/protein kinase B activation. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:11126–11134. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M510724200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rea S, James DE. Moving GLUT4: The biogenesis and trafficking of GLUT4 storage vesicles. Diabetes. 1997;46:1667–1677. doi: 10.2337/diab.46.11.1667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mueckler M. Facilitative glucose transporters. Eur J Biochem. 1994;219:713–725. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18550.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mueckler M, Caruso C, Baldwin SA, Panico M, Blench I, Morris HR, Allard WJ, Lienhard GE, Lodish HF. Sequence and structure of a human glucose transporter. Science. 1985;229:941–945. doi: 10.1126/science.3839598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kahn BB. Facilitative glucose transporters: Regulatory mechanisms and dysregulation in diabetes. J Clin Invest. 1992;89:1367–1374. doi: 10.1172/JCI115724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Garvey WT, Maianu L, Huecksteadt TP, Birnbaum MJ, Molina JM, Ciaraldi TP. Pretranslational suppression of a glucose transporter protein causes insulin resistance in adipocytes from patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and obesity. J Clin Invest. 1991;87:1072–1081. doi: 10.1172/JCI115068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kelley DE, Mintun MA, Watkins SC, Simoneau JA, Jadali F, Fredrickson A, Beattie J, Thériault R. The effect of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and obesity on glucose transport and phosphorylation in skeletal muscle. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:2705–2713. doi: 10.1172/JCI118724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Calle MC, Fernandez ML. Inflammation and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2012;38:183–191. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2011.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Donath MY. Inflammation as a sensor of metabolic stress in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Endocrinology. 2011;152:4005–4006. doi: 10.1210/en.2011-1691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Borst SE. The role of TNF-alpha in insulin resistance. Endocrine. 2004;23:177–182. doi: 10.1385/ENDO:23:2-3:177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Qi C, Pekala PH. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced insulin resistance in adipocytes. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 2000;223:128–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1373.2000.22318.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kanety H, Feinstein R, Papa MZ, Hemi R, Karasik A. Tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1). Possible mechanism for suppression of insulin-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:23780–23784. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.40.23780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Paz K, Hemi R, LeRoith D, Karasik A, Elhanany E, Kanety H, Zick Y. A molecular basis for insulin resistance. Elevated serine/threonine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and IRS-2 inhibits their binding to the juxtamembrane region of the insulin receptor and impairs their ability to undergo insulin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:29911–29918. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.47.29911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Heydrick SJ, Jullien D, Gautier N, Tanti JF, Giorgetti S, Van Obberghen E, Le Marchand-Brustel Y. Defect in skeletal muscle phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase in obese insulin-resistant mice. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:1358–1366. doi: 10.1172/JCI116337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Stephens JM, Lee J, Pilch PF. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced insulin resistance in 3T3-L1 adipocytes is accompanied by a loss of insulin receptor substrate-1 and GLUT4 expression without a loss of insulin receptor-mediated signal transduction. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:971–976. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.2.971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wang CN, O'Brien L, Brindley DN. Effects of cell-permeable ceramides and tumor necrosis factor-alpha on insulin signaling and glucose uptake in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Diabetes. 1998;47:24–31. doi: 10.2337/diab.47.1.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hauner H, Petruschke T, Russ M, Röhrig K, Eckel J. Effects of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) on glucose transport and lipid metabolism of newly-differentiated human fat cells in cell culture. Diabetologia. 1995;38:764–771. doi: 10.1007/s001250050350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Miles PD, Romeo OM, Higo K, Cohen A, Rafaat K, Olefsky JM. TNF-alpha-induced insulin resistance in vivo and its prevention by troglitazone. Diabetes. 1997;46:1678–1683. doi: 10.2337/diab.46.11.1678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lang CH, Dobrescu C, Bagby GJ. Tumor necrosis factor impairs insulin action on peripheral glucose disposal and hepatic glucose output. Endocrinology. 1992;130:43–52. doi: 10.1210/en.130.1.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Yu C, Chen Y, Cline GW, Zhang D, Zong H, Wang Y, Bergeron R, Kim JK, Cushman SW, Cooney GJ, et al. Mechanism by which fatty acids inhibit insulin activation of insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1)-associated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity in muscle. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:50230–50236. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M200958200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hotamisligil GS, Spiegelman BM. Tumor necrosis factor alpha: A key component of the obesity-diabetes link. Diabetes. 1994;43:1271–1278. doi: 10.2337/diab.43.11.1271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Takaesu G, Ninomiya-Tsuji J, Kishida S, Li X, Stark GR, Matsumoto K. Interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor-associated kinase leads to activation of TAK1 by inducing TAB2 translocation in the IL-1 signaling pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:2475–2484. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.7.2475-2484.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Emanuelli B, Glondu M, Filloux C, Peraldi P, Van Obberghen E. The potential role of SOCS-3 in the interleukin-1beta-induced desensitization of insulin signaling in pancreatic beta-cells. Diabetes. 2004;53(Suppl 3):S97–S103. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.suppl_3.S97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Rui L, Yuan M, Frantz D, Shoelson S, White MF. SOCS-1 and SOCS-3 block insulin signaling by ubiquitin-mediated degradation of IRS1 and IRS2. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:42394–42398. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C200444200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Fujishiro M, Gotoh Y, Katagiri H, Sakoda H, Ogihara T, Anai M, Onishi Y, Ono H, Funaki M, Inukai K, et al. MKK6/3 and p38 MAPK pathway activation is not necessary for insulin-induced glucose uptake but regulates glucose transporter expression. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:19800–19806. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M101087200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Eguez L, Lee A, Chavez JA, Miinea CP, Kane S, Lienhard GE, McGraw TE. Full intracellular retention of GLUT4 requires AS160 Rab GTPase activating protein. Cell Metab. 2005;2:263–272. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Jager J, Grémeaux T, Cormont M, Le Marchand-Brustel Y, Tanti JF. Interleukin-1beta-induced insulin resistance in adipocytes through down-regulation of insulin receptor substrate-1 expression. Endocrinology. 2007;148:241–251. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-0692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kim JA, Yeh DC, Ver M, Li Y, Carranza A, Conrads TP, Veenstra TD, Harrington MA, Quon MJ. Phosphorylation of Ser24 in the pleckstrin homology domain of insulin receptor substrate-1 by Mouse Pelle-like kinase/interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase: Cross-talk between inflammatory signaling and insulin signaling that may contribute to insulin resistance. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:23173–23183. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M501439200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lagathu C, Bastard JP, Auclair M, Maachi M, Capeau J, Caron M. Chronic interleukin-6 (IL-6) treatment increased IL-6 secretion and induced insulin resistance in adipocyte: Prevention by rosiglitazone. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;311:372–379. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Senn JJ, Klover PJ, Nowak IA, Mooney RA. Interleukin-6 induces cellular insulin resistance in hepatocytes. Diabetes. 2002;51:3391–3399. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.12.3391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sun Y, Liu S, Ferguson S, Wang L, Klepcyk P, Yun JS, Friedman JE. Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase overexpression selectively attenuates insulin signaling and hepatic insulin sensitivity in transgenic mice. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:23301–23307. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M200964200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



