Skip to main content
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1995 Nov;74(5):528–530. doi: 10.1136/hrt.74.5.528

Assessment of the severity of coronary artery disease at postmortem examination. Are the measurements clinically valid?

J M Mann 1, M J Davies 1
PMCID: PMC484074  PMID: 8562239

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To compare the assessment of severity of coronary artery stenosis by the conventional pathology methods with a method designed to resemble quantitative angiography. DESIGN--31 human hearts harvested at necropsy were fixed by perfusion of the aortic root with 10% formol saline at 120 mm Hg for 24 hours. The right coronary and left anterior descending coronary arteries were transversely sliced every 2 mm and the absolute lumen dimensions plotted against the distance from the coronary ostium. Stenosis figures were calculated by comparing the lumen diameter with the lumen diameters in adjacent normal arterial segments in a manner identical to that used in angiographic measurement. The coronary artery segments were then processed histologically. Stenosis was then remeasured by comparing the lumen diameter with the diameter of the vessel within the internal elastic lamina identified by elastic van Gieson staining. RESULTS--Compared with the method that was analogous to angiography, the pathology method used on histological slides overestimated the degree of stenosis by 25-30%. The lack of concordance between the methods was not a function of the severity of the stenosis. CONCLUSION--When they read necropsy reports in which the severity of coronary artery stenosis is assessed cardiologists should be aware of the discrepancy between clinical and pathological methods.

Full text

PDF
528

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Corrado D., Basso C., Poletti A., Angelini A., Valente M., Thiene G. Sudden death in the young. Is acute coronary thrombosis the major precipitating factor? Circulation. 1994 Nov;90(5):2315–2323. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.5.2315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Glagov S., Weisenberg E., Zarins C. K., Stankunavicius R., Kolettis G. J. Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med. 1987 May 28;316(22):1371–1375. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198705283162204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hutchins G. M., Bulkley B. H., Ridolfi R. L., Griffith L. S., Lohr F. T., Piasio M. A. Correlation of coronary arteriograms and left ventriculograms with postmortem studies. Circulation. 1977 Jul;56(1):32–37. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.56.1.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Isner J. M., Donaldson R. F., Fortin A. H., Tischler A., Clarke R. H. Attenuation of the media of coronary arteries in advanced atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiol. 1986 Nov 1;58(10):937–939. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(86)80015-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Losordo D. W., Rosenfield K., Kaufman J., Pieczek A., Isner J. M. Focal compensatory enlargement of human arteries in response to progressive atherosclerosis. In vivo documentation using intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 1994 Jun;89(6):2570–2577. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.6.2570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Schwartz J. N., Kong Y., Hackel D. B., Bartel A. G. Comparison of angiographic and postmortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1975 Aug;36(2):174–178. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(75)90522-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES