Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1995 Dec;74(6):676–679. doi: 10.1136/hrt.74.6.676

Use of lead adjustment formulas for QT dispersion after myocardial infarction.

J M Glancy 1, C J Garratt 1, K L Woods 1, D P de Bono 1
PMCID: PMC484130  PMID: 8541177

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To determine whether lead adjustment formulas for correcting QT dispersion measurements are appropriate in patients after myocardial infarction. DESIGN--Retrospective analysis of QTc dispersion measurements in 461 electrocardiograms (ECGs). Data are presented as uncorrected QTc dispersion "adjusted" for a number of measurable leads and coefficient of variation of QTc intervals for ECGs in which between six and 12 leads had a QT interval that could be measured accurately. PATIENTS--Patients were drawn from the placebo arm of the second Leicester Intravenous Magnesium Intervention Trial. Some 163 patients who subsequently died and an equal number of known survivors had ECGs recorded on day 2 or 3 of acute myocardial infarction. ECGs were also available in 135 of these patients from at least 1 month postinfarct. RESULTS--The most common lead in which a QT interval measurement was omitted was aVR (n = 176), the least common lead was V3 (n = 13). The longest QTc interval measured was most usually in lead V4 (n = 72) and the shortest in lead V1 (n = 67). As the number of measurable leads decreased there was a small, nonsignificant increase in QTc dispersion from 12 lead to eight lead ECGs (mean (SD) 100 (35.5) v 109.5 (47.9) ms). Lead adjusted QTc dispersion (QTc dispersion/square root of the number of measurable leads) showed a large, significant increase when the number of measurable leads decreased from 12 to eight (28.9 (10.3) v 38.7 (16.1) ms, P < 0.001). A similar trend was seen for coefficient of variation of QTc intervals (standard deviation of QTc intervals/mean QTc interval 64.3 (2.19) v 8.45 (3.94)%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS--Lead adjustment formulas for QT dispersion are not appropriate in patients with myocardial infarction. Large differences in lead adjusted QTc dispersion are produced, dependent on the number of measurable leads, for very small differences in QTc dispersion. It is recommended that QT dispersion is presented as unadjusted QT and QTc dispersion, stating the mean (SD) of the number of leads in which a QT interval was measured.

Full text

PDF
676

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barr C. S., Naas A., Freeman M., Lang C. C., Struthers A. D. QT dispersion and sudden unexpected death in chronic heart failure. Lancet. 1994 Feb 5;343(8893):327–329. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91164-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bhullar H. K., Fothergill J. C., Goddard W. P., de Bono D. P. Automated measurement of QT interval dispersion from hard-copy ECGs. J Electrocardiol. 1993 Oct;26(4):321–331. doi: 10.1016/0022-0736(93)90053-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buja G., Miorelli M., Turrini P., Melacini P., Nava A. Comparison of QT dispersion in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy between patients with and without ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death. Am J Cardiol. 1993 Oct 15;72(12):973–976. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)91118-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Day C. P., McComb J. M., Matthews J., Campbell R. W. Reduction in QT dispersion by sotalol following myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1991 Mar;12(3):423–427. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Glancy J. M., Garratt C. J., Woods K. L., de Bono D. P. QT dispersion and mortality after myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1995 Apr 15;345(8955):945–948. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90697-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Higham P. D., Campbell R. W. QT dispersion. Br Heart J. 1994 Jun;71(6):508–510. doi: 10.1136/hrt.71.6.508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hnatkova K., Malik M., Kautzner J., Gang Y., Camm A. J. Adjustment of QT dispersion assessed from 12 lead electrocardiograms for different numbers of analysed electrocardiographic leads: comparison of stability of different methods. Br Heart J. 1994 Oct;72(4):390–396. doi: 10.1136/hrt.72.4.390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kautzner J., Yi G., Camm A. J., Malik M. Short- and long-term reproducibility of QT, QTc, and QT dispersion measurement in healthy subjects. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994 May;17(5 Pt 1):928–937. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb01435.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. LEPESCHKIN E., SURAWICZ B. The measurement of the Q-T interval of the electrocardiogram. Circulation. 1952 Sep;6(3):378–388. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.6.3.378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Linker N. J., Colonna P., Kekwick C. A., Till J., Camm A. J., Ward D. E. Assessment of QT dispersion in symptomatic patients with congenital long QT syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 1992 Mar 1;69(6):634–638. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90155-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Priori S. G., Napolitano C., Diehl L., Schwartz P. J. Dispersion of the QT interval. A marker of therapeutic efficacy in the idiopathic long QT syndrome. Circulation. 1994 Apr;89(4):1681–1689. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.4.1681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pye M., Quinn A. C., Cobbe S. M. QT interval dispersion: a non-invasive marker of susceptibility to arrhythmia in patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias? Br Heart J. 1994 Jun;71(6):511–514. doi: 10.1136/hrt.71.6.511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Woods K. L., Fletcher S., Roffe C., Haider Y. Intravenous magnesium sulphate in suspected acute myocardial infarction: results of the second Leicester Intravenous Magnesium Intervention Trial (LIMIT-2) Lancet. 1992 Jun 27;339(8809):1553–1558. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91828-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES