Abstract
Metal-free click chemistry has become an important tool for pretargeted approaches in the molecular imaging field. The application of bioorthogonal click chemistry between a pretargeted trans-cyclooctene (TCO) derivatized monoclonal antibody (mAb) and a 99mTc-modified 1,2,4,5-tetrazine for tumor imaging was examined in vitro and in vivo. The HYNIC tetrazine compound was synthesized and structurally characterized, confirming its identity. Radiolabeling studies demonstrated that the HYNIC tetrazine was labeled with 99mTc at an efficiency of >95% and was radiochemically stable. 99mTc-HYNIC tetrazine reacted with the TCO-CC49 mAb in vitro demonstrating its selective reactivity. In vivo biodistribution studies revealed non-specific liver and GI uptake due to the hydrophobic property of the compound, however pretargeted SPECT imaging studies demonstrated tumor visualization confirming the success of the cycloaddition reaction in vivo. These results demonstrated the potential of 99mTc- HYNIC-tetrazine for tumor imaging with pretargeted mAbs.
Keywords: pretargeted imaging, click chemistry, 99mTc-HYNIC, monoclonal antibody
Introduction
Receptor targeting radiopharmaceuticals is an area of intense research for molecular imaging and cancer therapy. Considerable efforts have been focused on the development of molecules and biomolecules with highly selective recognition and affinity for specific targets, as well as on the advancement of labeling strategies that lead to improved radiolabeling yields without compromising target affinity and recognition [1–5]. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been used for many years to deliver radionuclides to targeted tissues; however, their slow pharmacokinetics and tumor accumulation limits applications to radionuclides of moderate and long half-lives [6–7]. Extended circulation times of radiolabeled antibodies allow enough time for tumor accumulation, however it increases the dose to non-target tissues due to slow clearance [5,8–9]. Alternatively, a pretargeted approach is a strategy that attempts to overcome problems related to the slow pharmacokinetics of radiolabeled antibodies [8–10]. The pretargeting labeling strategy is a multi-step process that takes advantage of the high affinity of multidentate large biomolecules and antibodies, without the drawbacks associated with slow clearance (Scheme 1A). For example, the first step of a pretargeted mAb approach includes administration of a tagged unlabeled antibody and subsequent tumor targeting and clearance of unbound material. The second step involves injection of a radiolabeled small molecule that has high specificity and bioorthogonal reactivity for the tag on the tumor localized antibody [11–13]. The rapid in vivo pharmacokinetics of the radiolabeled small molecule are designed to maximize the accumulation of the radionuclide in tumor and decrease radioactivity in other non target tissues, resulting in superior target/non target ratios compared to directly radiolabeled antibodies and reducing patient dose [14,15]. Bioorthogonal click chemistry has become an important tool for the pretargeted approach [16,17]. In this sense, the inverse electron demand Diels-Alder reaction between a highly reactive trans-cyclooctene (TCO) and an electron deficient 1,2,4,5-tetrazine (TZ) is particularly exciting for imaging of large molecules and nanoparticles in vivo [16–18]. This strategy opens a variety of applications that could be applied to in vivo imaging and therapy. Several bio-orthogonal TZ-based cycloaddition ligations have been used for in vivo radiolabeling of biological molecules as antibodies [19,20]. The synthesis of different TZ derivates allowed radiolabeling with 111In, 177Lu, 68Ga and subsequent use in pretargeted approaches for in vivo imaging and therapy with antibodies and polymers [21–24].
Schematic 1.
A pretargeted approach using bioorthogonal click chemistry for tumor imaging. A) A schematic of the pretargeted approach using a TCO conjugated mAb and radiolabeled TZ to target and image a tumor in vivo. B) Synthesis of the HYNIC-TZ derivative (1). C) The radiolabeling procedure for HYNIC-TZ with 99mTc.
Technetium-99m (99mTc) is the most widely used radionuclide for diagnosis in nuclear medicine. It is easily obtained from 99Mo-99mTc generator and presents a gamma emission of 140 keV and has a 6-hour half-life. These properties are suitable for routine clinical imaging, mainly in those countries where PET technology is still being established [25–27]. Several labeling methods can be used for preparing [99mTc]-labeled biomolecules [28]. The 6-hydrazinonicotinc acid (HYNIC) is a commonly used bifunctional chelating agent [29]. It is attractive for preparing [99mTc]-labeled peptides and proteins with high efficiency, under mild conditions, and is highly stable in vivo [30]. However, one of the main problems of HYNIC is the highly nucleophilic hydrazine group that can undergo unwanted side reactions with traces of electrophiles, such as aldehydes and ketones, present as contaminants and induce the inactivation of HYNIC [30–32]. Many different protecting groups are used to avoid HYNIC instability [31–36]. In this context, tert-butoxycarbonyl group (Boc) is widely used as a protecting group during the conjugation of HYNIC to peptides, however the deprotection step required before labeling is not compatible with protein integrity [37–39]. Recently, Surfraz et al. reported the trifluoroacetyl group (Tfa) for hydrazine-HYNIC protection that could be deprotected during 99mTc labeling conditions on a conjugated peptide model [40,41]. They also showed that HYNIC-Tfa deprotection is promoted by a technetium complex intermediate during reduction of Tc (VII) in presence of SnCl2 and tricine [41,42].
Several approaches are under investigation for the development of a 99mTc radiolabeled TZ for SPECT imaging with pretargeted mAbs, phage and nanoparticles [43–47]. Development of a pretargeted/bioorthogonal approach using the TCO-TZ combination for labeling with 99mTc would expand the application and utility of 99mTc-labeled antibodies. Therefore, herein we present the evaluation and the potential use of bioorthogonal click chemistry applied to 99mTc labeling of biomolecules. For this purpose, we describe the synthesis of a HYNIC-Tfa protected TZ derivative, the 99mTc labeling process, evaluation in in vitro binding assays and in vivo SPECT imaging with pretargeted TCO conjugated CC49 mAb.
Results and Discussion
Chemistry
The application of inverse electron demand Diels-Alder cycloaddition for bioorthogonal in vivo pretargeted imaging with 99mTc is presented in Scheme 1A. A trifluoroacetyl protected HYNIC-tetrazine derivative (1, HYNIC-TZ, Scheme 1B) was synthesized from 4-(6-methyl-1,2,4,5-tetrazin-3-yl)phenylmethanamine and a succinimidyl protected HYNIC precursor. Compound (1) was obtained in a yield of 27 %. It was stable for at least 24 h in PBS and BSA (Supplementary material, Figure S2).
Different 99mTc labeling conditions, of temperature and reaction times, were studied when tricine was used as coligand (Scheme 1C, Table 1). We observed a HYNIC-TZ labeling yield superior to 90 % in all the cases, leading to an optimized condition when the reaction was performed at 37 °C for 15 min. The radiochemical purity of the complex (RCP) was established by RP-HPLC (Figure 1). The labeled complex was shown to be stable up to 24 h in the reaction mixture and PBS when it was incubated at 25 °C (Figure 2).
Table 1.
The effect of temperature and incubation time on labeling efficiency of tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ using tricine as coligand (n=4).
| temperature (°C) | reaction time (min) | % RCPa |
|---|---|---|
| 25 | 60 | 97 ± 2 |
| 25 | 30 | 92 ± 1 |
| 37 | 30 | 97 ± 2 |
| 37 | 15 | 96 ± 1 |
% RCP: radiochemical purity expressed as percentage.
Figure 1.
RP-HPLC analysis of the radiolabeling mixture showing the unlabeled HYNIC-TZ (1) (tR = 17.3 min) in the UV (Abs 280 nm) profile (upper) and the radiolabeled complex with tricine as coligand (tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ) (tR = 15.3 min) in the radioactive profile (lower).
Figure 2.
Radiochemical stability assay of the tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ complex in the labeling reaction mixture and in PBS at 25 °C over 24 h.
To evaluate the effect of the coligands on the lipophilicity property of the 99mTc-HYNIC-tetrazine complexes, the labeling of (1) using tricine, ethylenediaminediacetic acid (EDDA), or a mixture of tricine and EDDA as coligand was performed (see experimental conditions in Supplementary material). The n-octanol/water partition coefficients for the different 99mTc-HYNIC-tetrazine complexes showed that the coligand tricine resulted in the least lipophilic entity with a Log P value of −0.54 ± 0.07 (Table 2). Based on these results, the in vivo behavior of the tricine complex of 99mTc-HYNIC-tetrazine (tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ) was evaluated in vitro and in vivo.
Table 2.
The lipophilicity dependence of 99mTc-HYNIC-TZ complexes on coligand used.
| coligand | LogP |
|---|---|
| tricine | −0.54 ± 0.07 |
| EDDA | −0.40 ± 0.01 |
| tricine:EDDA | −0.51 ± 0.02 |
Biology
In vitro studies
To evaluate the bioorthogonal reaction between TCO and tri-Tc-HYNIC-TZ we used the CC49 mAb, which binds to the pancarcinoma antigen TAG72. The antibody TCO conjugation was achieved after a 30 min reaction with a 10 equivalent excess of succinimidyl-TCO (TCO-NHS) as described elsewhere [19]. The number of reactive TCO present per antibody was determined by SDS-PAGE after a 30 min incubation of the conjugated antibody with different molar ratios of tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ resulting in an average of 8.5 TCO per antibody (see Supplementary material, Figure S3).
After TCO conjugation, the immunoreactivity of the modified antibody was determined using immobilized mucin from bovine submaxillary glands (BSM) as the target antigen on high binding ELISA plates with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a negative control. No significant differences were observed in the antigen recognition between the non-modified and the TCO modified CC49 (Figure 3A).
Figure 3.
Characterization of CC49-TCO’s bioactivity and cycloaddition reactivity. A) Bioactivity assay of CC49-TCO and unmodified CC49 antibody with surface immobilized BSM detected with goat-anti mouse-HRP and ABTS as substrate followed at 405 nm (data represent the mean ± SD. (*) no significant difference (p > 0.05), Student’s t-test). B) Tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ-TCO cycloaddition with BSM surface immobilized CC49-TCO (data represent the mean ± SD. (**) significant difference (p < 0.05), Student’s t-test). C) The reaction of tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ with pretargeted CC49-TCO and CC49 bound to live LS174T cells (data represent the mean ± SD. (**) significant difference (p < 0.05), Student’s t-test).
After confirming that antibody recognition was not affected by TCO conjugation, we evaluated the cycloaddition reaction between tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ and CC49-TCO with a pretargeted approach using immobilized BSM on high binding ELISA plates. The assay consisted of allowing the mAb-TCO conjugate or mAb to bind immobilized BSM followed by the addition of tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ. The tetrazine-TCO reaction was evaluated after 30 min of incubation. The results confirmed that the pretargeted mAb-TCO conjugate was radiolabeled via the tetrazine-TCO reaction and not due to non-specific binding of tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ (Figure 3B).
The next step was to study the application of pretargeting to the detection of the TAG72 biomarker using live cells through the bioorthogonal reaction with tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ. Radioimmunodetection of living LS147T cells was confirmed due to the reaction between bound mAb-TCO and tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ (Figure 3C).
In vivo studies
Biodistribution studies of tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ (6.5×104 Ci/mol) in CD-1 normal mice were performed at 1, 4 and 24 h post-injection (Table 3). Clearance from the blood and major organs was fast except for liver, intestines and kidney. At 1 h post injection of tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ 1.70 ± 0.11 % ID/g was present in blood and 43.76 ± 1.80 % ID was eliminated through bladder and urine. Non-specific accumulation was observed in liver and intestines at 1 h post injection with uptake values of 14.15 ± 0.43 % ID/g and 5.62 ± 0.59 % ID/g, respectively. A significant decrease of activity in the small intestine after 4 h with a concurrent increase to 21.82 ± 2.73 % ID/g in the large intestine suggested that a significant portion of the excretion pathway of the compound was via the gastrointestinal tract, which was probably due to hydrophobic nature of the tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ construct. Urine metabolites were evaluated by HPLC at 1 h post-injection. The HPLC profile showed the presence of a peak in urine with a similar retention time to the tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ (see Supplementary material, Figure S5). Plasma protein binding studies revealed that the percentage of plasma bound protein was 14.0 ± 3.2 % for tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ and 17.3 ± 0.6 % for EDDA complex (see Supplementary material). These are moderate plasma values and are consistent with the blood clearance data in vivo.
Table 3.
Biodistribution of tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ at 1, 4 and 24 h in CD-1 normal mice (n=3).
| Percent Injected Dose / gram | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Organs | 1 h | 4 h | 24 h |
| Blood | 1.70 ± 0.11 | 1.01 ± 0.35 | 0.50 ± 0.02 |
| Heart | 0.68 ± 0.06 | 0.39 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.04 |
| Lung | 1.33 ± 0.13 | 0.77 ± 0.07 | 0.64 ± 0.10 |
| Liver | 14.15 ± 0.43† | 10.61 ± 0.89† | 8.95 ± 0.58 |
| Spleen | 0.46 ± 0.04 | 0.27 ± 0.03 | 0.25 ± 0.03 |
| Stomach | 0.32 ± 0.11 | 1.49 ± 1.69 | 0.48 ± 0.16 |
| Large intestine | 0.42 ± 0.18 | 21.82 ± 2.73 | 1.28 ± 0.28 |
| Small intestine | 8.07 ± 0.61 | 3.45 ± 0.24 | 0.45 ± 0.01 |
| Intestines | 5.62 ± 0.59† | 10.01 ± 0.67† | 0.71 ± 0.11† |
| kidneys | 7.84 ± 1.63† | 3.79 ± 0.51† | 3.12 ± 0.25 |
| Brain | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 |
| Muscle | 0.43 ± 0.04 | 0.24 ± 0.025 | 0.19 ± 0.03 |
| Bone | 0.61 ± 0.09 | 0.31 ± 0.09 | 0.49 ± 0.07 |
| Skin | 1.41 ± 0.10 | 0.88 ± 0.08 | 0.82 ± 0.16 |
| Percent Injected Dose | |||
| Bladder and Urine | 43.76 ± 1.80 | 46.01 ± 2.28 | 74.73 ± 2.68 |
Statistical analyses was performed using a two way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s
p < 0.05).
Evaluation of the tumor imaging properties of pretargeted CC49-TCO and tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ in vivo was performed in mice bearing LS174T colon cancer tumors. For this purpose, CC49-TCO (100 µg) was injected via the tail vein and allowed to accumulate for 48 h. Unbound circulating antibody was reduced using one dose of clearing agent [23], followed 2 h later by the administration of tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ. SPECT/CT imaging was acquired 2 h post injection of radioactivity (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
In vivo SPECT imaging. Coronal slice (A) and transverse slice (C) of pretargeted CC49-TCO in vivo tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ imaging in mice bearing LS174T colon cancer tumor, 2 h post injection. Coronal slice (B) and transverse slice (D) control image of tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ.
The SPECT/CT imaging results showed there was tumor visualization, which confirmed that the in vivo cycloaddition reaction was successful between the pretargeted CC49-TCO and the tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ. Additionally, non-specific background was observed in the whole body image mainly in the liver, gall bladder, intestines and kidneys as predicted by the biodistribution studies and the tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ control image (Figure 4B and D). These results suggested that the hydrophobic nature of tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ resulted in non-specific background and highlighted the need for a more hydrophilic second generation of HYNIC-TZ construct.
A biodistribution study was performed with tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ in LS174T tumor bearing mice at the 2 h imaging time point. A modest amount of tumor uptake (1.39 ± 0.43 % ID/g; Supplemental Table 3) was evident, however the majority of the radioactivity was in the liver and gastrointestinal tract and the kidneys. The results of the tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ biodistribution study were consistent with the imaging study. A blocking experiment was performed in which a 10-fold excess of the CC49 mAb was co-injected with the CC49-TCO mAb. A 17 % reduction in tumor uptake was observed (data not shown). Tumor uptake of 125I iodinated CC49-TCO was high at 43.53 % ID/g (Supplemental Table 3). The low tumor uptake of the tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ was not due to a lack of CC49-TCO mAb but likely the result of being sequestered in the liver and GI tract and unavailable for reaction with tumor targeted CC49-TCO mAb.
Pretargeted SPECT and PET in vivo imaging using the Diels-Alder TCO-Tz cycloaddition approach have been successful in preclinical studies with 111In [19], 177Lu [23], 64Cu [49] and 18F [50]. All of these examples have involved tetrazines linked to a cyclic aminopolycarboxilic acid metal chelators like DOTA or NOTA, which appears to provide sufficient solubility for favorable in vivo imaging. The 99mTc-HYNIC and 99mTc-tricarbonyl complexes are far less hydrophilic than the radiometal cyclic aminopolycarboxilic acid complexes. Improving the hydrophilicity of the tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ is necessary to achieve desirable in vivo biodistribution. The addition of a polyethylene glycol spacer and or a charged amino acid peptide sequence between the HYNIC and TZ should increase the hydrophilicity of the HYNIC-TZ conjugate and improve its in vivo pharmacokinetic properties resulting in high tumor to background ratios.
Conclusions
We have developed a HYNIC-tetrazine derivative with the hydrazino moiety protected by a trifluoroacetyl moiety. The construct was labeled with 99mTc efficiently under mild conditions. The radiolabeled compound was shown to be stable in vitro and in vivo. The tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ and TCO interaction was evaluated, showing promising results in vitro. In vivo, the pretargeted 99mTc-based SPECT tumor imaging proof of concept was positive. However, the biodistribution profile and imaging studies indicated the need of a more hydrophilic tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ derivative.
Experimental
General
All chemicals and solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Merck, Dorwill and Carlo Erba. All solvents for organic synthesis were distilled prior to use. Analytical TLC was performed on alumina plates and visualized with UV light (254 nm). (E)-4-Cycloocten-1-yl 2,5-dioxo-1-pyrrolidinyl ester carbonic acid (TCO-NHS) was purchased from Click Chemistry Tools, LLC., and 4-(6-methyl-1,2,4,5-tetrazin-3-yl)phenylmethanamine hydrochloride was purchased from Conju-Probe, LLC, San Diego. Structural elucidations were based on 1H, 13C, COSY, HMBC, and HSQC spectroscopies, and MS spectrometry. NMR spectra were acquired on a Bruker DPX-400 spectrometer. The chemical shifts values were expressed in ppm relative to tetramethylsilane as internal standard. Mass spectra were determined on a Thermo LCQ Fleet LC/MS spectrometer using electrospray ionization (ESI). To determine the purity of the compound, elemental microanalyses obtained on a Carlo Erba Model EA1108 elemental analyzer from vacuum-dried sample was used. The analytical results for C, H, and N were within ± 0.4 of the theoretical values. Water was purified and deionized (18 MΩ/cm2) on a Milli-Q water filtration system (Millipore Corp., Milford, MA). 99Mo-99mTc generators were purchased from TecnoNuclear (Argentina). Radioactivity was counted in a CRC7 Capintec dose calibrator and in a solid scintillation counter detector with 3"×3" NaI(Tl) crystal associated with a single channel analyzer (ORTEC, Oak Ridge, TN). High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was performed on an Agilent 1200 Series Infinity Star equipped with GABI detector, a UV detector and a ThermoScientific Hypersil ODS reverse phase C18 column (300 mm x 4.6 × 10 microns). Radio-TLC detection was accomplished using instant thin-layer chromatography (ITLC) on silica gel strips (Pall Corporation, Port Washington, NY).
Organic Syntheses
N-Succinimidyl 6-(trifluoroacetyl)hydrazinopyridine-3-carboxylic acid
The product was synthesized as described elsewhere [48].
N’-{5-[4-(6-methyl-1,2,4,5-tetrazin-3-yl)phenylmethylcarbamoyl]pyridin-2-yl}-2,2,2-trifluoroacetohydrazide (1)
To a mixture of 4-(6-methyl-1,2,4,5-tetrazin-3-yl)phenylmethanamine hydrochloride (20 mg, 84.14 µmol) and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (2 equivalents) in a mixture of THF:DMF (4:1) (4 mL), 1.2 equivalents of N-succinimidyl 6-(trifluoroacetyl)hydrazinopyridine-3-carboxylic acid was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h. The solvent was concentrated in vacuo and the final product purified on a preparative alumina TLC using CH2Cl2:MeOH (95:5) as mobile phase. After evaporation in vacuo (1) was obtained as pink solid (10 mg, 27 % yield, mp: 242–243 °C). The purity of (1) was verified by HPLC (Figure S1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 9.40 (bs, 2H, NHNH), 8.81 (bt, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H, NHCOPy), 8.49 (s, 1H, Py), 8.43 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.91 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H, Py), 7.58 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H, Ar), 6.75 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, Py), 4.55 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 2H, CH2), 2.98 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 167.22 (CCH3), 165.86 (Py-CO), 163.15 (Ar-CN2), 158.20 (q, J = 31 Hz, C=OCF3), 158.08 (Py), 148.56 (Py), 145.13 (Ar), 136.48 (Py), 130.40 (C2N4-C(Ar)), 128.23 (Ar), 127.59 (Ar), 117.18 (Py), 113.01 (q, J = 297 Hz, C=OCF3), 104.36 (Py), 42.36 (CH2), 20.97 (CH3). ESI-MS, expected m/z: 433.13 (M+H)+., found m/z: 433.12 (M+H)+.. Anal. calc for C18H15F3N8O2: C, 50.0; H, 3.5; N, 25.9. Found: C, 49.9; H, 3.2; N, 25.6.
99mTc-HYNIC-tetrazine radiolabeling
Tricine as coligand (100 µL of tricine solution in water (100 mg/mL), 55.8 µmol) was added to 20 µg of (1) (1 µg/µL, 0.46 nmol), followed by addition of 20 µL of a fresh solution of SnCl2 (2 mg/mL in ethanol, 17.7 µmol) and 0.111 MBq of Na99mTcO4 (up to 200 µL). The mixture (pH 5.0) was incubated for 15 min at 37 °C in a dry bath. Labeling efficiency was determined using HPLC with (A) water/0.05% TFA and (B) MeOH as mobile phases (0% to 100% B in 20 min and 100% to 0% B in 2 min) and ITLC-SG (citrate 0.1M) to quantify 99mTc-colloidal.
Similar experimental conditions were employed for the preparation of 99mTc-HYNIC-tetrazine using ethylenediaminediacetic acid (EDDA) or a mixture of tricine:EDDA as coligands, respectively. In the case of EDDA alone as coligand, 7.1 µmol was used in the procedure. For the mixture 55.8 µmol of tricine and 7.1 µmol of EDDA was used. See supplementary information for details of experimental conditions.
Physicochemical studies
Partition coefficient
Log P values were determined in triplicate as follows. The radiolabeled products were purified by RP-HPLC with C18 column and water (0.1 % TFA) and MeCN (0.1 % TFA) as the mobile phases (0% to 3% B in 3 min, 3% to 25% B in 0.1 min, 25% to 30% in 20 min, 30% to 90% in 2 min, 90% 3 min, 90% to 3% in 2 min, 3% 5 min) followed by C18 SEP-PAK cartridge purification with 50 % ethanol in phosphate buffered saline pH 7.4 (PBS) and purged with N2. An appropriate amount of the corresponding 99mTc-HYNIC-tetrazine (6475 MBq/mg) was dissolved in PBS to get a final concentration of 200,000 CPM/mL. A mixture of 500 µL of n-octanol and 500 µL of 99mTc-HYNIC-tetrazine diluted in PBS was mixed vigorously for 1 min and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 minutes. Three fractions of 100 µL were collected from both phases of each tube, and the radioactivity counted in a NaI well counter. The partition coefficient was obtained as log10(n-octanol counts/aqueous phase counts).
In vitro stability of 99mTc-HYNIC-tetrazine radiolabeling
In vitro stability of tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ was evaluated in the reaction mixture and in PBS at 25 °C during 2, 4 and 24 h post labeling in triplicate. The labeling yield was determined using RP-HPLC and ITLC-SG (citrate 0.1 M) to quantify 99mTc-colloidal.
In vitro biological studies
Antibody production
The CC49 mAb was purified from CC49 hybridoma (ATCC) culture media using protein-A affinity chromatography (MABTRAP, GE Health Sciences). The purified antibody was concentrated to 5 mg/mL in PBS, aliquoted and stored at −80° C prior to use.
Antibody TCO conjugation
To 2 mg of CC49 antibody (5mg/mL solution) in PBS, 15 µL of sodium carbonate buffer (1 M) was added to adjust the pH of the mixture to 9.5, followed by the addition of TCO-NHS (17 µg in 3.4 µL of dry DMSO, 10 molar excess). The reaction mixture was incubated at room temperature for 30 min with shaking in darkness. The TCO conjugated mAb was purified from free NHS-TCO reagent using a PD-10 column (Amersham Biosciences) with PBS. The concentration of purified mAb-TCO was determined by measuring UV absorbance at 280 nm.
CC49-TCO receptor recognition
BSM (10 µg/mL ) in PBS was immobilized on 96 well ELISA plate overnight at 4 °C and blocked with blocking buffer (Rockland) for 1 h at 37°C. BSA (10 µg/mL) was used as a negative control. After several washes with 0.1 % PBS-Tween, 100 µL of CC49 and CC49-TCO (10 µg) were incubated in BSM and BSA coated wells for 1 h at 37 °C and washed with 0.1 % PBS-Tween (three times). The binding of CC49 antibody to immobilized antigen was detected colorimetrically using an HRP-conjugated anti-mouse antibody and 2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS) as the substrate.
Tetrazine-TCO reaction of surface of immobilized CC49-TCO
BSM (10 µg/mL) was immobilized on 96 well ELISA plate overnight at 4 °C and blocked with blocking buffer (Rockland) for 1 h at 37°C. BSA (10 µg/mL) was used as a control. After several washes with (PBS - 0.1 % Tween), 100 µL of CC49 and CC49-TCO (10 µg) were incubated in BSM and BSA coated wells for 1 h at 37 °C, followed by 3 washes with 0.1 % PBS-Tween. Subsequently, 100 µL of tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ (1µCi /100 µL) in BSA (1 %) was incubated for 30 min and washed three times with 0.1 % PBS-Tween. Finally the radiolabeled antibody-BSM complex was removed with 300 µL of aqueous NaOH (2 M), collected and measured on a gamma counter.
Pretargeted LS147T cell binding
LS147T cells in RPMI media with fetal bovine serum (10 %) were seeded (0.5 × 106) in 24 well plates and allowed to grown overnight. Live cells were washed with PBS (1 % BSA) and incubated for 30 min with 200 µL of CC49-TCO and CC49 (100 µg /mL). After the incubation period, the cells were washed with 500 µL of PBS and incubated for 30 min with 1 µCi of tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ (5.5 MBq/µg, in 200 µL of PBS. After two washes with PBS the cells were lysed with aqueous NaOH (2 M). The milieu was collected and radioactivity measured on a gamma counter to quantify membrane bound activity.
In vivo biological studies
Animal studies were conducted in compliance with the University of Missouri Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval.
Tumor model
The tumor cell line LS147T was purchased from ATCC and grown in RPMI media with fetal bovine serum (10 %). Nude (nu/nu: Harlen) mice were inoculated subcutaneously with 2 million LS 147T cells (PBS:Matrigel, 2:1). Biodistribution and imaging studies were performed when the tumors reached 0.5–1 cm3.
In vivo biodistribution of 99mTc-HYNIC-tetrazine
Tumor free CD-1 mice were injected intravenously through the tail vein with tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ (0.17–0.74 MBq, 5.55 GBq/mg) and sacrificed after 1, 4 and 24 h post injection (n=3). The organs and tissues of interest were dissected, weighed and the radioactivity of the samples was measured in a gamma counter. Radioactivity in the urine and feces was also determined. The radioactivity was expressed as percentage of injected dose per gram of tissue (% ID/g) or percent of injected dose (% ID). The total amount of blood was considered as 6.5 % of total body weight.
Pretargeted in vivo imaging
Tumor bearing mice (n = 2) were injected via the tail vein with 100 µg of CC49-TCO. Forty-eight hours post antibody administration, the mice were injected with 160 µg of clearing agent (Tetrazine and galactose conjugated albumin, Tagworks Pharmaceuticals, The Netherlands [23]) followed by the intravenously administration of tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ (1:1 molar ratio with TCO:(1), 7.4 MBq/µg ~21 MBq in 100 µL). A control group of mice received tri-99mTc-HYNIC-TZ alone. After 2 h the mice were anesthetized with 1 % – 2 % isofluorane and SPECT-CT images were acquired with a Siemens Inveon SPECT/CT unit (Siemens Medical Solution Incorporated, TN, USA) equipped with dual pixellated NaI detectors, 1.0 mm multi-pinhole collimators, a CCD X-ray detector, and an 80 kVp microfocus X-ray source. Volumetric SPECT data were generated with a three-dimensional ordered-subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm with geometric misalignment corrections. Concurrent microCT whole-body imaging was performed to allow for fusion of anatomic and molecular data.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Marc Robillard and Raffaella Rossin from Tagworks Pharmaceuticals for the clearing agent, Fabio Gallazzi from the University of Missouri Structural Biology core for mass spectra and the Research Animal Core and the Biomolecular Imaging Center at the Harry S Truman Veterans’ Hospital for biodistribution and imaging studies. Partial financial support was obtained from NIH IMAT grant R21 CA177526-02, Universidad de la República and PEDECIBA (Uruguay) and University of Missouri. We thank ANII and CSIC for M.F.G. fellowships support.
Abbreviations
- TCO
trans-cyclooctene
- TZ
1,2,4,5-tetrazine
- PET
Positron Emission Tomography
- HYNIC
6-hydrazinonicotinc acid
- SPECT
Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography
- PBS
phosphate buffer saline
- BSA
bovine serum albumin
- ABTS
2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid)
- RCP
radiochemical purity
- EDDA
ethylenediaminediacetic acid
- DMSO
dimethyl sulfoxide
- SDS-PAGE
sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
- BSM
bovine submaxillary glands
- CPM
counts per minute
- mAb
monoclonal antibody
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Contributor Information
María Fernanda García, Email: fgmelian@gmail.com.
Xiuli Zhang, Email: zhangxiu@missouri.edu.
Manankumar Shah, Email: masvh4@mail.missouri.edu.
Jessica Newton-Northup, Email: newtonj@missouri.edu.
Pablo Cabral, Email: pabloc7@gmail.com.
Hugo Cerecetto, Email: hcerecetto@gmail.com.
Thomas Quinn, Email: quinnt@missouri.edu.
References
- 1.Weissleder R. Molecular imaging in cancer. Science. 2006;312:1168–1171. doi: 10.1126/science.1125949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wadas TJ, Pandya DN, Solingapuram Sai KK, Mintz A. Molecular targeted α-particle therapy for oncologic applications. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2014;203:253–260. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fani M, Maecke HR. Radiopharmaceutical development of radiolabelled peptides. Eur. J. Nuc. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2012;39:11–30. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-2001-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Deutscher SL. Phage display in molecular imaging and diagnosis of cancer. Chem. Rev. 2010;110:3196–3211. doi: 10.1021/cr900317f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hamoudeh M, Kamleh MA, Diab R, Fessi H. Radionuclides delivery systems for nuclear imaging and radiotherapy of cancer. Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 2008;60:1329–1346. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Goldenberg DM. Targeted therapy of cancer with radiolabeled antibodies. J. Nucl. Med. 2002;4:693–713. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Milenic DE, Brady ED, Brechbiel MW. Antibody-targeted radiation cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 2004;3:488–499. doi: 10.1038/nrd1413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sharkey RM, Goldenberg DM. Perspectives on cancer therapy with radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies. J. Nucl. Med. 2005;46:115S–127S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Goldenberg DM, Sharkey RM. Novel radiolabeled antibody conjugates. Oncogene. 2007;26:3734–3744. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Goodwin D, Meares C, Diamanti C, McCall M, Lai C, Torti F, McTigue M, Martin B. Use of specific antibody for rapid clearance of circulating blood background from radiolabeled tumor imaging proteins. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 1984;9:209–215. doi: 10.1007/BF00448541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Goodwin DA, Mears CF, McTigue M, David GS. Monoclonal antibody hapten radiopharmaceutical delivery. Nucl. Med. Commun. 1986;7:569–580. doi: 10.1097/00006231-198608000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stickney DR, Anderson LD, Slater JB, Ahlem CN, Kirk GA, Schweighardt SA, Frincke JM. Bifunctional Antibody: A binary radiopharmaceutical delivery system for imaging colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. Res. 1951;51:6650–6655. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Le Doussal JM, Martin M, Gautherot E, Delaage M, Barbet J. In vitro and in vivo targeting of radiolabeled monovalent and divalent haptens with dual specificity monoclonal antibody conjugates: enhanced divalent hapten affinity for cell-bound antibody conjugate. J. Nucl. Med. 1989;30:1358–1366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Boerman OC, van Schaijk FG, Oyen WJ, Corstens FH. Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy of cancer: Progress step by step. J. Nucl. Med. 2003;44:400–411. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kraeber-Bodéré F, Faivre-Chauvet A, Saï-Maurel C, Campion L, Fiche M, Gautherot E E, Le Boterff J, Barbet J, Chatal JF, Thédrez P. Toxicity and efficacy of radioimmunotherapy in carcinoembryonic antigen-producing medullary thyroid cancer xenograft: Comparison of iodine 131-labeled F(ab’)2 and pretargeted bivalent hapten and evaluation of repeated injections. Clin. Cancer. Res. 1999;5:3183S–3189S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Prescher JA, Dube DH, Bertozzi CR. Chemical remodeling of cell surfaces in living animals. Nature. 2004;430:873–877. doi: 10.1038/nature02791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sletten EM, Bertozzi CR. Bioorthogonal chemistry: Fishing for selectivity in a sea of functionality. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2009;48:6974–6998. doi: 10.1002/anie.200900942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Blackman ML, Royzen M, Fox JM. Tetrazine ligation: Fast bioconjugation based on inverse-electron-demand Diels-Alder reactivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:13518–13519. doi: 10.1021/ja8053805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rossin R, Verkerk PR, van den Bosch SM, Vulders RC, Verel I, Lub J, Robillard MS. In vivo chemistry for pretargeted tumor imaging in live mice. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2010;49:3375–3378. doi: 10.1002/anie.200906294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Devaraj NK, Weissleder R, Hilderbrand SA. Tetrazine-based cycloadditions: application to pretargeted live cell imaging. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008;19:2297–2299. doi: 10.1021/bc8004446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Knight JC, Cornelissen B. Bioorthogonal chemistry: Implications for pretargeted nuclear (PET/SPECT) imaging and therapy. Am. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2014;4:96–113. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rossin R, van den Bosch SM, Ten Hoeve W, Carvelli M, Versteegen RM, Lub J, Robillard MS. Highly reactive trans-cyclooctene tags with improved stability for Diels-Alder chemistry in living systems. Bioconjugate Chem. 2013;24:1210–1217. doi: 10.1021/bc400153y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rossin R, Läppchen T, van den Bosch SM, Laforest R, Robillard MS. Diels-Alder reaction for tumor pretargeting: in vivo chemistry can boost tumor radiation dose compared with directly labeled antibody. J. Nucl. Med. 2013;54:1989–1995. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.123745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nichols B, Qin Z, Yang J, Vera DR, Devaraj NK. 68Ga chelating bioorthogonal tetrazine polymers for the multistep labeling of cancer biomarkers. Chem. Commun. 2014;50:5215–5217. doi: 10.1039/c3cc49530b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jurisson S, Berning D, Jia Wei, Oangshe Ma. Coordination compounds in nuclear medicine. Chem. Rev. 1993;93:1137–1156. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu S. The role of coordination chemistry in the development of target-specific radiopharmaceuticals. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004;33:445–461. doi: 10.1039/b309961j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dewanjee MK. The chemistry of 99mTc-labeled radiopharmaceuticals. Semin. Nucl. Med. 1990;20:5–27. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2998(05)80173-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Banerjee S, Ambikalmajan Pillai MR, Ramamoorthy N. Evolution of Tc-99m in diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2001;31:260–277. doi: 10.1053/snuc.2001.26205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Abrams MJ, Juweid M, TenKate CI, Schwartz DA, Hauser MM, Gaul FE, Fuccello AJ, Rubin RH, Strauss HW, Fischman AJ. Technetium-99m–human polyclonal IgG radiolabeled via the hydrazino nicotinamide derivative for imaging focal sites of infection in rats. J. Nuc. Med. 1990;31:2022–2028. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liu S. Bifunctional coupling agents for radiolabeling of biomolecules and target-specific delivery of metallic radionuclides. Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 2008;60:1347–1370. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Meszaros LK, Dose A, Biagini SCG, Blower PJ. Hydrazinonicotinic acid (HYNIC) - coordination chemistry and applications in radiopharmaceutical chemistry. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2010;363:1059–1069. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Liu S. 6-Hydrazinonicotinamide derivatives as bifunctional coupling agents for 99mTc-labeling of small biomolecules. In: Krause W, editor. Contrast Agents III: Topics in Current Chemistry. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2005. pp. 117–153. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dirksen A, Dawson PE. Rapid oxime and hydrazone ligations with aromatic aldehydes for biomolecular labeling. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008;19:2543–2548. doi: 10.1021/bc800310p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schwartz DA, Abrams MJ, Hauser MM, Gaul FE, Larsen SK, Rauh D, Zubieta JA. Preparation of hydrazino-modified proteins and their use for the synthesis of 99mTc-protein conjugates. Bioconjugate Chem. 1991;2:333–336. doi: 10.1021/bc00011a007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Harris TD, Sworin M, Williams N, Rajopadhye M, Damphousse PR, Glowacka D, Poirier MJ, Yu K. Synthesis of stable hydrazones of a hydrazinonicotinyl-modified peptide for the preparation of 99mTc-labeled radiopharmaceuticals. Bioconjugate Chem. 1999;10:808–814. doi: 10.1021/bc9900237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Edwards DS, Liu S, Harris AR, Poirier MJ, Ewels BA. 99mTc-Labeling of hydrazones of a hydrazinonicotinamide conjugated cyclic peptide. Bioconjugate Chem. 1999;10:803–807. doi: 10.1021/bc990022e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rajopadhye M, Harris TD, Yu K, Glowacka D, Damphousse PR, Barrett JA, Heminway SJ, Edwards SD, Carroll TR. Synthesis, evaluation and Tc-99m complexation of a hydrazinonicotinyl conjugate of a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist cyclic peptide for the detection of deep vein thrombosis. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1997;7:955–960. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Greenland WEP, Howland K, Hardy J, Fogelman I, Blower PJ. Solid-phase synthesis of peptide radiopharmaceuticals using Fmoc-N-ε-(Hynic-Boc)-Lysine, a technetium-binding amino acid: Application to Tc-99m–labeled salmon calcitonin. J. Med. Chem. 2003;46:1751–1757. doi: 10.1021/jm030761n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Decristóforo C, Mather SJ. Technetium-99m somatostatin analogues: Effect of labelling methods and peptide sequence. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 1999;26:869–876. doi: 10.1007/s002590050461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.B-U Surfraz M, King R, Mather SJ, Biagini SCG, Blower PJ. Trifluoroacetyl-HYNIC peptides: Synthesis and 99mTc radiolabeling. J. Med. Chem. 2007;50:1418–1422. doi: 10.1021/jm061274l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Surfraz MB-U, King R, Mather SJ, Biagini SCG, Blower PJ. Trifluoroacetyl as a protecting group for HYNIC: Stability in the presence of electrophiles and application in the synthesis of Tc-99m-radiolabelled peptides. Tetrahedron. 2010;66:2037–2043. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Surfraz MB-U, Biagini SCG, Blower PJ. A technetium intermediate specifically promotes deprotection of trifluoroacetyl HYNIC during radiolabelling under mild conditions. Dalton Trans. 2008;22:2920–2922. doi: 10.1039/b805110k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Valliant JF, Patel R, Vito A. Synthesis and evaluation of single amino acid chelate (SAAC) tetrazine derivatives for bioorthogonal conjugation with Re/99mTc. Nuc. Med. Biol. 2014;41:614–615. [Google Scholar]
- 44.García MF, Shah M, Newton J, Cabral P, Deutscher SL, Cerecetto H, Quinn TP. The application of metal free click chemistry to imaging cancer targeting phage. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2015;58:S111. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Vito A, Alarabi H, Kent J, Valliant J. Preparation and evaluation of a single tetrazine-based synthon for labeling biomolecules with both 99mTc and 18F. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2015;58:S18. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Walsh J, Zeglis B, Sanders V, Lewis JS, Francesconi LC. A pretargeted SPECT imaging strategy employing Technetium-99m based bioorthogonal Diels-Alder click chemistry. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2015;58:S60. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bilton H, Ahmad Z, Valliant J. Imidazole-based, tetrazine functionalized 99mTc(I) tridentate chelates for bioorthogonal chemistry. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2015;58:S61. [Google Scholar]
- 48.García MF, Calzada V, Camacho X, Goicochea E, Gambini JP, Quinn TP, Porcal W, Cabral P. Microwave-assisted synthesis of HYNIC protected analogue for 99mTc labeled antibody. Curr. Radiopharm. 2014;7:84–90. doi: 10.2174/1874471007666141128160449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zeglis BM, Brand C, Abdel-Atti D, Carnazza KE, Cook BE, Carlin S, Reiner T, Lewis JS. Optimization of a Pretargeted Strategy for the PET Imaging of Colorectal Carcinoma via the Modulation of Radioligand Pharmacokinetics. Mol. Pharm. 2015;12:3575–3587. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Meyer JP, Houghton JL, Kozlowski P, Abdel-Atti D, Reiner T, Pillarsetty NV, Scholz WW, Zeglis BM, Lewis JS. (18)F-Based Pretargeted PET Imaging Based on Bioorthogonal Diels-Alder Click Chemistry. Bioconjug. Chem. 2015 Oct 28; doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00504. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






