Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1975 Jan;37(1):2–8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.37.1.2

Premonitory sign of heart block in acute posterior myocardial infarction.

A Barrillon, M Chaignon, L Guize, A Gerbaux
PMCID: PMC484148  PMID: 1111556

Abstract

The appearance of the ARS complex in leads V3R and V4R was analysed in a series of 94 patients with acute posterior myocardial infarction. The cases of posterior myocardial infarction with direct signs of injury (ST segment elevation with a rise of 0.5 mm or more of point F and/or QS pattern) in leads V3R and/or V4R were complicated three times as often by atrioventricular block as those in which such signs were absent (66% and 22%, respectively; P smaller than 0.001). When one of these signs was present in leads V3R and/or V4R, the disorder of conduction was "severe" (complete atrioventricular block or sinotrial block with pauses) in half the cases and "unstable" (bradycardia below 50 beats/min; ventricular pause with or without syncope; widening of QRS complex; ventricular hyperexcitability) in one-third, justifying the introduction of a stimulating catheter. Such disorders were found, respectively, only 1 in 7 (14%), and less than 1 in 10 (8%) when these signs were absent (P smaller than 0.001). The association of ST segment elevation and QS pattern was rarer (15 cases) than the isolated finding of either sign. It was found in the most severe disorders of atrioventricular conduction. The changes observed in leads V3R and/or V4R before the appearance of atrioventricular block enable one to predict which patients with posterior myocardial infarction are the most likely to develop atrioventricular block. These electrocardiographic features seem to indicate septal involvement.

Full text

PDF
2

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blondeau M., Maurice P., Reverdy V., Lenègre J. Troubles du rythme et de la conduction auriculo-ventriculaire dans l'infarctus du myocarde récent. Considérations anatomiques. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1967 Dec;60(12):1733–1751. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Christiansen I., Haghfelt T., Amtorp O. Complete heart block in acute myocardial infarction: drug therapy. Am Heart J. 1973 Feb;85(2):162–166. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(73)90456-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Delahaye J. P., Touboul P., Clement C., Ducluzeau R., Perrot E., Boissel J. P. L'électro-stimulation endocavitaire dans les troubles de conduction de l'infarctus du myocarde. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1971 Jun;64(6):813–831. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Friedberg C. K., Cohen H., Donoso E. Advanced heart block as a complication of acute myocardial infarction. Role of pacemaker therapy. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1968 Mar;10(5):466–481. doi: 10.1016/s0033-0620(68)80004-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hackel D. B., Estes E. H., Jr Pathologic features of atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction disturbances in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1971 Jun;43(6):977–979. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.43.6.977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hecht H. H., Kossmann C. E., Childers R. W., Langendorf R., Lev M., Rosen K. M., Pruitt R. D., Truex R. C., Uhley H. N., Watt T. B., Jr Atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction. Revised nomenclature and concepts. Am J Cardiol. 1973 Feb;31(2):232–244. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(73)91036-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. James T. N. Pathogenesis of arrhythmias in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1969 Dec;24(6):791–799. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(69)90468-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaltman A. J. Indications for temporary pacemaker insertion in acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1971 Jun;81(6):837–841. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(71)90089-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lassers B. W., Julian D. G. Artificial pacing in management of complete heart block complicating acute myocaerdial infarction. Br Med J. 1968 Apr 20;2(5598):142–146. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5598.142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lev M., Kinare S. G., Pick A. The pathogenesis of atrioventricular block in coronary disease. Circulation. 1970 Sep;42(3):409–425. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.42.3.409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Norris R. M. Heart block in posterior and anterior myocardial infarction. Br Heart J. 1969 May;31(3):352–356. doi: 10.1136/hrt.31.3.352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rosen K. M., Loeb H. S., Chuquimia R., Sinno M. Z., Rahimtoola S. H., Gunnar R. M. Site of heart block in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1970 Nov;42(5):925–933. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.42.5.925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Scherlag B. J., Lau S. H., Helfant R. H., Berkowitz W. D., Stein E., Damato A. N. Catheter technique for recording His bundle activity in man. Circulation. 1969 Jan;39(1):13–18. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.39.1.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Touboul P., Clément C., Porte J., Magrina J., Delahaye J. P. Etude électrophysiologique des troubles de conduction auriculo-ventriculaire dans l'infarctus myocardique récent. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1972 Nov;65(11):1287–1298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Watson C. C., Goldberg M. J. Evaluation of pacing for heart block in myocardial infarction. Br Heart J. 1971 Jan;33(1):120–124. doi: 10.1136/hrt.33.1.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES