Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Neurobiol. 2015 Sep 26;53(8):5229–5251. doi: 10.1007/s12035-015-9414-9

Inhibition of protein ubiquitination by paraquat and 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium impairs ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation pathways

Juliana Navarro-Yepes 1,2,4,*, Annadurai Anandhan 1,2,*, Erin Bradley 1, Iryna Bohovych 1,3, Bo Yarabe 1, Annemieke de Jong 5, Huib Ovaa 5, You Zhou 3, Oleh Khalimonchuk 1,3, Betzabet Quintanilla-Vega 4,, Rodrigo Franco 1,2,
PMCID: PMC4842169  NIHMSID: NIHMS775392  PMID: 26409479

Abstract

Intracytoplasmic inclusions of protein aggregates in dopaminergic cells (Lewy bodies) are the pathological hallmark of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Ubiquitin (Ub), alpha [α]-synuclein, p62/sequestosome 1 and oxidized proteins are major components of Lewy bodies. However, the mechanisms involved in the impairment of misfolded/oxidized protein degradation pathways in PD are still unclear. PD is linked to mitochondrial dysfunction and environmental pesticide exposure. In this work, we evaluated the effect of the pesticide paraquat (PQ) and the mitochondrial toxin 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+) on Ub-dependent protein degradation pathways. No increase in the accumulation of Ub-bound proteins or aggregates was observed in dopaminergic cells (SK-N-SH) treated with PQ or MPP+, or in mice chronically exposed to PQ. PQ decreased Ub protein content, but not its mRNA transcription. Protein synthesis inhibition with cycloheximide depleted Ub levels and potentiated PQ–induced cell death. Inhibition of proteasomal activity by PQ was found to be a late event in cell death progression, and had no effect on either the toxicity of MPP+ or PQ, or the accumulation of oxidized sulfenylated, sulfonylated (DJ-1/PARK7 and peroxiredoxins) and carbonylated proteins induced by PQ. PQ- and MPP+-induced Ub protein depletion prompted the dimerization/inactivation of the Ub-binding protein p62 that regulates the clearance of ubiquitinated proteins by autophagic. We confirmed that PQ and MPP+ impaired autophagy flux, and that the blockage of autophagy by the overexpression of a dominant-negative form of the autophagy protein 5 (dnAtg5) stimulated their toxicity, but there was no additional effect upon inhibition of the proteasome. PQ induced an increase in the accumulation of α-synuclein in dopaminergic cells and membrane associated foci in yeast cells. Our results demonstrate that inhibition of protein ubiquitination by PQ and MPP+ is involved in the dysfunction of Ub-dependent protein degradation pathways.

Keywords: Ubiquitin-proteasome system, sequestosome 1, SQSTM1, MPP+, ubiquitylation, autophagy, pesticides, Parkinson’s disease

INTRODUCTION

Proteins are continually at risk of damage, misfolding, and aggregation. If not properly degraded, misfolded protein aggregates can cause cellular toxicity and disease. Cells have evolved an elaborated network of protein quality control mechanisms to maintain the integrity of the proteome. Protein homeostasis (proteostasis) involves specific processes that guard protein synthesis, folding and trafficking. In addition, protein degradation pathways such as the ubiquitin (Ub)-proteasome-system (UPS) and autophagy, degrade misfolded or aggregated proteins to avoid proteotoxic stress [1]. A dysfunction in protein quality control mechanisms is a hallmark in neurodegenerative diseases [2,1]. Lewy bodies (LBs) found in Parkinson’s disease (PD) brains are composed of misfolded protein aggregates. A number of proteins have been identified as major components of LBs including α-synuclein, Ub and p62 [35]. Inhibition of proteasomal activity has been proposed to lead to the accumulation of Ub-bound proteins including α-synuclein [2]. Interestingly, other reports have demonstrated the presence of Ub-negative protein inclusions in PD brains [67], suggesting that different mechanisms other than impaired proteasomal activity, can be involved in the accumulation of misfolded protein aggregates.

A disruption in autophagic pathways has also been linked to PD pathogenesis [2,1,89]. It is now well established that protein ubiquitination (or ubiquitylation) directs the recognition of selective cargo for degradation via the autophagosome-lysosome system [1011]. Conditional disruption of autophagy in dopaminergic cells leads to the accumulation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates in vivo [1213]. Recognition of ubiquitinated proteins for their degradation by autophagy is mediated by the adapter protein p62/sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1), and the neighbor of BRCA1 gene 1 (NBR1). p62 binds ubiquitinated proteins via its Ub-associated (UBA) C-terminal domain, while its binding to autophasomal LC3/GABARAP proteins involves a short linear sequence known as LIR (LC3-interacting region) [11,14]. Interestingly, p62 also mediates the autophagic clearance of non-ubiquitinated proteins [1516], and it may mediate the degradation of some poly-ubiquitinated proteins by the proteasome [1718].

A large variety of oxidative protein modifications can be induced by reactive oxygen/nitrogen species, or by-products of oxidative stress. Oxidized proteins can form oligomeric complexes resulting in the formation of protein aggregates. Irreversibly oxidized proteins such as protein carbonyls have to be degraded in order to maintain proper cellular homeostasis. Ub-dependent and independent degradation of oxidized proteins by the 26S or 20S proteasome has been reported. However, covalent crosslinks, disulphide bonds, hydrophobic interactions, and heavily oxidized stable protein aggregates are not suitable for proteasomal degradation. Recent evidence suggests that autophagy plays a major role in the removal of oxidized protein aggregates by their incomplete degradation within the lysosomal compartment that results in the formation of polymerized lipofuscin-like aggregates consisting of oxidized polypeptides [1920]. Interestingly, p62 silencing enhances the accumulation of oxidized proteins [21], supporting a role for protein ubiquitination in the clearance of oxidized proteins by autophagy [22].

Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress are causative factors for dopaminergic cell loss in PD. Sporadic (non-hereditary) PD accounts for >80% of reported cases, while genetic mutations only account for 5% of sporadic PD occurrence [23]. Exposures to environmental toxicants, including pesticides (paraquat [PQ] and rotenone), are recognized as risk factors for an increased susceptibility to develop PD [2429]. Thus, mitochondrial toxins such as inhibitors of complex I (1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium [MPP+] and rotenone) and pesticides (PQ and rotenone as well) are used as toxicological models to dissect the molecular mechanisms by which mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress mediate dopaminergic cell death. It has been reported that PQ and MPP+ induce the accumulation of Ub-bound protein aggregates by impairment of the proteasomal activity [3032]. We and others have reported that impairment of autophagy facilitates dopaminergic cell death induced by PQ and MPP+ [3334]. Both autophagy and the UPS are complementary protein degradation pathways where inhibition of the UPS triggers the clearance of Ub-bound proteins or aggregates by autophagy [3536,12]. However, their exact and complementary contribution to dopaminergic cell death and the clearance of misfolded/oxidized protein aggregates induced by environmental/mitochondrial toxins has not been clarified.

In this work, we demonstrate that the environmental toxicant PQ and the mitochondrial complex I inhibitor MPP+ decrease protein ubiquitination in dopaminergic cells. Inhibition of the proteasome activity was found to be a late stage during cell death progression, and did not modulate the toxicity of either PQ or MPP+. Depletion of Ub was shown to parallel p62 dimerization/inactivation, and the accumulation of oxidized proteins and α-synuclein. Inhibition of autophagy stimulated PQ and MPP+ toxicity. Our results demonstrate that early impairment in Ub protein synthesis by environmental and mitochondrial insults inactivates p62 and Ub-dependent degradation pathways.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reagents

Chloroquine, 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA), 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium iodide (MPP+), and rotenone were obtained from SIGMA-Aldrich. 6-OHDA was prepared as described previously [37]. Paraquat (PQ, 1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium dichloride) and cycloheximide (CHX) were purchased from Acros Organics. (S)-MG132 (carbobenzoxy-L-leucyl-L-leucyl-L-leucinal, Z-LLL-CHO) was obtained from Cayman Chemical. Pyr-41 (4-[4-[(5-Nitro-2-furanyl)methylene]-3,5-dioxo-1-pyrazolidinyl]benzoic acid ethyl ester) was purchased from Tocris. Stock solutions for MG132, Pyr-41 and rotenone were prepared in DMSO (vehicle). All other chemicals, were from SIGMA-Aldrich, Thermo Fisher Scientific or Acros Organics.

Cell culture and treatments

The dopaminergic properties of the neuroblastoma cell line SK-N-SH and their cell culture have been detailed before [33]. The Lund Human Mesencephalic (LUHMES) neuronal precursor cell line, a subclone of the tetracycline-controlled v-myc-overexpressing human mesencephalic-derived cell line MESC2.10, was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Biosource Center). Culture of LUHMES cells was done according to Scholz et al., [38]. Briefly, culture ware was pre-coated with 50 µg/ml poly-L-ornithine (SIGMA-Aldrich) and 1 µg/ml fibronectin (BD Biosciences). Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM)/Ham’s F-12 Nutrient Mixture (GIBCO or Hyclone) supplemented with Neuroplex N-2 (Gemini or Life Technologies), 2 M L-glutamine (GIBCO or Hyclone), and 40 ng/ml recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF, Peprotech or StemRD). Cells were grown at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. Cells were treated as indicated in the figures. Control conditions included the appropriate vehicle, which never exceed >0.01% (v/v).

Protein extraction and western immunoblot (WB)

Protein extraction and quantification were done as explained before [39]. For the detection of sulfenic acid modified proteins (PSOH) cells were incubated with the cell-permeable nucleophilic reagent dimedone prior to harvesting. Dimedone selectively reacts with the electrophilic sulfur atom in sulfenic acid to form a stable thioether that can be detected using the anti-sulfenic acid modified 2-thiodimedone specific antibody [40]. The protein carbonyl content was determined by the reaction of carbonyl groups in protein side chains with 2,4–dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH, SIGMA-Aldrich) to form 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone (DNP), which is detected using anti-DNP antibodies (SIGMA-Aldrich). Cells were lysed in the presence of 1 mM DTPA (SIGMA-Aldrich). Ten µg of protein were dissolved with a final concentration of 6% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) w/v, and were derivatized by the addition of 20 mM DNPH in 10% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA, w/v) [4142]. After derivatization, samples were neutralized with 2 M Tris, 30% Glycerol (v/v) and 10.2% β-mercaptoethanol (v/v) to obtain a final concentration of 2.8% (v/v).

Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) was performed using Bis-Tris (with 3-(N-morpholino) propansulfonic acid [MOPS] + 5 mM sodium bisulfite-based running buffer), or Tris-Glycine gels. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) or PVDF membranes (Maine Manufacturing). Blots were blocked and incubated with the corresponding primary antibodies as recommended by the manufacturers: anti-Ub P4D1 (Cat # 3936) and α-synuclein (Cat # 2642, carboxy-terminal sequence) were from Cell Signaling; anti-green fluorescent protein (GFP, Cat # 1020) was from Aves Labs; anti-SQSTM1/p62 (Cat # Ab109012), anti-sulfonylated peroxiredoxins (Prx-SO3H, Cat # ab16830), and anti-sulfonylated DJ-1 (DJ-1-SO3H, Cat #ab169520) were from Abcam; anti-PSOH modified 2-thiodimedone-specific antibody (Cat #ABS30) was from Millipore; and anti-DNP (Cat # D9656), and anti-microtubule-associated protein 1B-light chain (3LC3B, Cat # L7543) were from SIGMA-Aldrich. Blots were probed with β-actin (Cat #A2228, SIGMA-Aldrich) to verify equal protein loading. Peroxidase conjugated secondary anti-rabbit, anti-mouse or anti-chicken antibodies (Thermo Scientific or Cell Signaling Technology) were used and bands were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) western blotting substrate (Thermo Scientific/Pierce or Amersham/GE Healthcare Life Sciences) in a C DiGit Chemiluminescence Western Blot Scanner (LI-COR Biosciences) or a VersaDoc Gel Imaging System (Bio-Rad).

Analysis of high molecular weight aggregates (HMW) of α-synuclein from soluble and insoluble fractions (SDS-PAGE), and native α-synuclein conformation by Blue Native-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (BN-PAGE) from Triton (X-100) insoluble fractions was performed as explained before [43].

Filter trap assay for ubiquitinated protein aggregates

Cells were harvested as explained before, and proteins were denatured in lithium dodecyl sulfate (LDS)-sample buffer. Ten to 50 µg of protein were filtered in a nitrocellulose membrane previously equilibrated in transfer buffer using a dot blotter (Scie-Plas). Membranes were washed twice with 2% SDS (w/v), 10 mM Tris-EDTA, pH 7.5 buffer and Ub-bound protein aggregates were detected by immunoblotting [44].

Cell death determination (loss of plasma membrane integrity) and oxidative stress

Loss of cell viability was determined using flow cytometry by measuring propidium iodide uptake (PI, 1 µg/ml) (Life Technologies or SIGMA-Aldrich) as a marker of plasma membrane integrity loss. Flow cytometry was performed as explained before [4546,37].

Evaluation of ubiquitin-dependent and -independent protein degradation

The plasmid encoding the Ub-dependent (GFPµ) fluorescence reporter was kindly provided by Dr. Ron Kopito (Stanford University) [47]. GFPµ consists of the fusion of a 16 amino acid CL1 degron (a degradation signal identified in yeast) with the carboxyl terminus of GFP. CL1 targets GFP for ubiquitination, aggregation and degradation by the proteasome [47]. The GFPµ plasmid was linearized with Nde I and transfected into SK-N-SH cells using FuGENE HD reagent (Promega). Cells stably overexpressing GFPµ were selected in medium containing 0.3 mg/ml geneticin (G418, Acros Organics), and GFPµ positive cells were sorted in a FACSAria cell sorter (BD Biosciences). After treatment, cells were harvested in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and analyzed by flow cytometry. GFPµ was excited with a 488 nm laser and the emission was detected through a 530/30 emission filter in a FACSort (BD Biosciences / Cytek-DxP-10 upgrade) flow cytometer. The geometric mean of GFPµ fluorescence intensity was assessed in viable cells (PI negative [-]).

Determination of proteasomal activity in total cell lysates

Total cell lysates were prepared on ice by homogenization in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (RIPA: 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl2, 1.0% Igepal [NP-40, v/v], 0.5% sodium deoxycholate [w/v], 0.1% SDS [w/v]). Lysates were cleared by centrifugation and protein content was determined by the bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA) method. The chymotrypsin-like activity was measured using the Proteasome Activity Assay Kit (Abcam 107921) that utilizes a 7-Amino-4-Methylcoumarin (AMC)-tagged peptide substrate (Succ-LLVY-AMC), which upon cleavage, releases free fluorescent AMC. Proteasomal-mediated AMC release was measured kinetically for 120 min using a microplate reader (TECAN, excitation/emission of 350/440 nm) in the presence or absence of MG132. Results were expressed as U/ml/mg of protein, where one unit (U) of proteasome activity is defined as the amount of proteasome that generates 1.0 nmol of AMC per minute (nmol/min).

Evaluation of cellular proteasomal activity

After treatment, cells were incubated with the boron-dipyrromethene (Bodipy)-tagged cell-permeable proteasome activity probe BodipyFL-Ahx3L3VS (200 nM) for 2 h, which was synthesized as explained before [4849]. Cells were harvested in PBS. BodipyFL-Ahx3L3VS was excited with a 488 nm laser and the emission was detected through a 530/30 emission filter in a BDFACSort (Cytek-DxP-10 upgrade). The geometric mean of BodipyFL-Ahx3L3VS fluorescence intensity was assessed to evaluate changes in fluorescence that directly relate to proteasome activity.

Evaluation of ubiquitin B (UBB) mRNA levels

RNA was extracted with Trizol (Life Technologies) following the manufacturer’s instructions and quantified in a Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific). cDNA strands were synthesized using 5 µg of RNA and Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus Reverse Transcriptase M-MLV (200 U/µL, Life Technologies), Oligo (dT) primer (0.5 µg/µL, Life Technologies) and dNTPs (2.5 mM each, Applied Biosystems) during one cycle of amplification under the following conditions: 1) 65 °C / 5 min, 2) 37 °C / 50 min, and 3) 70 °C / 15 min (Applied Biosystems 2720 Thermal Cycler). The UBB mRNA expression levels were determined by real time PCR (RT-PCR) using 100 ng of cDNA as template, TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), and specific TaqMan probes for the human poly-ubiquitin gene UBB (Hs00430290_m1 FAM, Applied Biosystems). The probe used to detect UBB mRNA amplifies 6 different variants (NM_018955 and NM_001281716-9). RT-PCR was performed in an ABI Prism 7500 (Applied Biosystems) under the following conditions: step 1) 50°C / 2 min; step 2) 95°C / 10 min; and step 3) 40 cycles of 95°C / 15 sec, followed by 60°C / 1 min. Data were normalized to human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH, Hs02758991_g1 VIC) as endogenous housekeeping gene by the relative standard curve method (http://www.uic.edu/depts/rrc/cgf/realtime/stdcurve), and the results were expressed as relative expression levels with respect to the control group.

Recombinant adenoviral vectors

The replication-deficient recombinant adenovirus (Ad5CMV) encoding a dominant negative form (dn) of the autophagy protein 5 (ATG5) was kindly provided by Dr. Gökhan S. Hotamisligil (Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA) [50]. Adenoviruses encoding wild type (WT) or mutant A53T α-synuclein were provided by Dr. Jean-Christophe Rochet (Purdue University) and have been described elsewhere [51,43]. Adenovirus containing only the CMV promoter (Ad-Empty) was used as a negative control. Viruses were amplified and tittered in HEK293T cells as previously described [52,39]. Cells were infected with viral particles at the indicated multiplicity of infection (MOI), and 24 h post-infection, they were washed and treated under the specified experimental conditions.

In vivo mouse model of paraquat toxicity

C57BL/6 mice (8–10 weeks old) (Jackson Labs) were administered two intraperitoneal injections of 10 mg/kg PQ or PBS every week for 9 consecutive weeks [53]. Animals were analyzed 1 week after the last injection. Mice were decapitated and midbrains were removed for WB analysis. For immunohistochemistry, mice were perfused intracardially with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Brains were removed, post-fixed for 24 h in 4% PFA and cryoprotected with 30% sucrose. Frozen brains were cut into 30 µm coronal sections using a sliding microtome at −16°C, and stored in PBS at 4°C until the immunohistochemical procedure. Endogenous peroxidase activity was inactivated. Sections were blocked with 10% normal horse serum (Life Technologies) and incubated 48 h with anti-tyrosine hydroxylase antibody (TH, Calbiochem, EMD/Millipore Cat # AB1542) or anti-Ub at 4°C. After rinsing, sections were incubated in secondary Alexa 647-anti-mouse or Alexa 568-anti-sheep (Jackson ImmunoResearch) for 1 h at RT. Sections were mounted with Fluoro-gel (Electron Microscopy Sciences) containing 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) to label nuclei. Images were collected on an Olympus IX 81 inverted confocal scanning fluorescent microscope (10x or 60x oil lens) (Olympus America) using Fluoview 500 Software. All procedures involving animals were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (Project 1025)

Yeast experiments

Saccharomyces cerevisiae W303-1A strain (MATa can1-100 ade2-1his3-1,15 leu2-3,112 trp1-1 ura3-1) harboring chromosomally integrated human α-synuclein-GFP expression cassette under the control of the inducible GAL1 promoter was generated and handled as previously described [43]. For confocal microscopy, live cells were visualized with 100x oil lens. For survival assays, aliquots of the yeast culture were diluted to 300 cells and plated onto YP (yeast peptone) plates containing 2% glucose (YPD, w/v) or 2% galactose (YPGal, w/v) as the sole carbon source. The colony forming units or degenerative colonies were scored following 2 (YPD plates) or 4 (YPGal plates) days of incubation at 28 °C.

Statistical analysis

Experimental replicas were independent and performed on separate days. Collected data were analyzed by using one-way, two-way or three-way ANOVA, and the appropriate post-hoc test using SIGMA-PLOT/STAT package. When ANOVA assumptions were not met (normality [Shapiro–Wilk test] or equal variance) Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA on Ranks or data transformation (two-way ANOVA) were performed on the collected data. Data were plotted as mean ± standard error (SE) using the same package for statistical analysis. Flow cytometry plots and immunoblots presented show the results of representative experiments. Relative densitometry analysis of WBs and dot blots was made using the ImageJ Program (National Institutes of Health, http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij).

RESULTS

Effect of PD-related toxicants on the accumulation of Ub-bound proteins

PD is linked to mitochondrial dysfunction and environmental pesticides exposure [5455]. Previous reports have demonstrated that PD-related toxicants impair the activity of the proteasome leading to the accumulation of Ub-bound protein aggregates [3032,5657]. We found that exposure of dopaminergic neuroblastoma cells (SK-N-SH) to PQ induces a dose-dependent decrease in ubiquitinated protein levels (Suppl. Fig. 1a). Lower non-toxic concentrations of PQ (≤0.2 mM) induced no changes in the levels of ubiquitin-bound proteins (Suppl. Fig. 1a). Higher toxic concentrations of PQ (≥0.5-1 mM) induced a slight decrease in ubiquitinated proteins (Suppl. Fig. 1a). Similarly, PQ induced a dose dependent decrease in the accumulation of Ub-bound proteins in the mesencephalic neuronal precursor cell line LUHMES (Suppl. Fig. 1a), whose sensitivity to PQ is significantly higher (∼100 to 200 µM, not shown). These results demonstrate that the decrease in ubiquitinated protein levels induced by PQ is not cell type specific.

A decrease in ubiquitinated proteins can be ascribed to different phenomena including an enhanced proteasomal activity, a decrease in protein ubiquitination, and/or a reduced availability of free Ub monomers/chains. To test this possibility, cells were treated with PQ and incubated with the cell permeable proteasome inhibitor MG132 (0.2 µM) 24 h prior to analysis (see Fig. 1a upper box). As previously reported [43], at this concentration and time of incubation MG132 efficiently inhibits the proteasome activity leading to the accumulation of Ub-bound proteins without triggering significant cell death by itself (Suppl. Fig. 1b and Fig. 2a–b). PQ induced a dose-dependent decrease in Ub-bound proteins even in the presence of MG132 (Fig. 1a, quantified in 1b [with respect to control] and in Suppl. Fig. 1c [with respect to each treatment in the absence of MG132]), suggesting that the decreased accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins is ascribed to a reduction in protein ubiquitination. Similarly, treatment with the mitochondrial toxin MPP+, but not rotenone or 6-OHDA, also reduced protein ubiquitination (Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1. PQ and MPP+ impair protein ubiquitination.

Fig. 1

a. Ub–bound proteins were evaluated by WB in SK-N-SH cells treated with PQ for 48 h. Cells were treated with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (0.2 µM) 24 h prior to analysis. b. Relative quantification (densitometry) of Ub-bound proteins in the presence of MG132 (●). Cells were treated as explained before (a). Data was normalized to β-actin and represented as fold change with respect to control (no PQ treatment). Cell death (○) was determined by the loss of plasma membrane integrity (PI uptake) and represented as % of cells with high PI fluorescence. Data are means ± S.E of at least n = 3. One-way ANOVA, Holm-Sidak post hoc test: a, p<0.05; Kruskal-Wallis One Way ANOVA on Ranks, Dunn’s post hoc test: b, p<0.05 compared to the corresponding control (no drug treatment). c. Changes in the levels of Ub-bound proteins were determined by WB in cells treated for 48 h with the complex I inhibitors MPP+ (2.5 mM) and rotenone (Rot, 4 µM) and the hydroxylated dopamine analog 6-OHDA (6-OH, 50 µM). d. Cells were treated as explained above (a and c) and ubiquitinated proteins and aggregates were evaluated by dot blot. Relative quantification of ubiquitinated proteins (numbers in italics) was normalized to β-actin and represented with respect to the indicated control. e. Immunohistochemistry detection of ubiquitinated proteins in the substantia nigra of C57Bl/6 mice treated for 9 weeks with PBS (e1-e5) or PQ (e6-e10). Blue squares in e1 or e6 depict the area of magnification for e2-e5 (PBS) or e7-e10 (PQ) panels. Scale bars, e1 and e6: 200 µm; e2-e5 and e7-e10: 20 µm. TH+, tyrosine hydroxylase positive neurons.

A dysfunction in the UPS has been shown to lead to the formation of SDS-resistant aggregates (aggresomes) [5859]. Protein complexes and aggregates are not well resolved by WB due to their high molecular weight. Thus, we evaluated the changes in both ubiquitinated proteins and aggregates by filter trap (retardation) dot blot assay. Fig. 1d corroborates that both PQ and MPP+ induce a decrease in protein ubiquitination, evaluated in the presence of MG132. Finally, to evaluate the effect of PQ exposure on the levels of Ub-bound proteins in dopaminergic cells in vivo, C57Bl/6 mice were exposed chronically (9 weeks) to PQ. Immunohistochemistry analysis of TH+ neurons and Ub shows that no major increase in Ub staining was induced by PQ in dopaminergic (TH+) cells (Fig. 1e).

We have previously demonstrated that cell death induced by PQ is a stochastic process [33,45,39], which means that it occurs at different rates within the same cell population. As such, WB analysis does not allow us to determine if the changes in Ub-bound protein levels occur before or after cell death (i.e. samples are composed by a mixed population of cells at different stages during the cell death process). Thus, we next evaluated the accumulation of GFPµ, a substrate for the UPS, in live cells (as depicted in broken square regions in Fig. 2a and c). Treatment with MG132 induces the accumulation of GFPµ (Fig. 2a–b). Lower non-toxic concentrations of PQ (≤ 0.2 µM) induced a significant accumulation of GFPµ (Fig. 2c–d), which agrees with the overall decrease in protein ubiquitination previously seen (Fig. 1a–b, PQ + MG132 data). Surprisingly, while higher toxic concentrations of PQ decrease protein ubiquitination further (Fig. 1a–b) this was not translated in added accumulation of GFPµ (Fig. 2c–d). A time-course analysis of changes in GFPµ levels induced by a toxic concentration of PQ (0.5 mM, 48 h, Suppl. Fig. 2a), or a sub-toxic PQ concentration (0.1 mM, 96 h, Fig. 2e) also evidenced an early accumulation of GFPµ followed by a reduction in its levels in live cells irrespective to the dose of PQ used or the length of exposure. Similarly, MPP+, which also impairs protein ubiquitination (Fig. 1c), also induced a reduction in GFPµ content (Suppl. Fig. 2b–c). Poly-ubiquitin tagged proteins have a half-life (t1/2) of ≤ 30 min [60]. The GFPµ reporter has a reported short-term t1/2 = 30 min [6162], while GFP itself has a t1/2 = 24 h [63]. Thus, our results suggest that while the transient accumulation of UPS substrates (GFPµ) induced by PQ is linked to an impairment of protein-ubiquitination (Fig. 2d–e), the subsequent Ub-independent decrease in GFPµ induced by both PQ and MPP+ is likely linked to impaired protein synthesis.

Fig. 2. PQ induces a transient accumulation of GFPµ, a reporter for the UPS.

Fig. 2

In a and c, the simultaneous analysis of cell death and changes in the levels of GFPµ induced by MG132 (24 h) or PQ treatment (48 h) was done by flow cytometry. Data are represented in two-dimensional 5% probability contour plots of changes in PI uptake (y axis) vs changes in GFPµ fluorescence (x axis). Broken squares depict how viable cells were selected. %s in contour plots represent the number of cells per quadrant. Using this type of analysis (gating), the changes in GFPµ induced by MG132 or PQ were quantified in b, d and e graphs. The geometric mean of GFPµ fluorescence intensity (●) was assessed in viable cells (PI negative [-]) and represented as fold change with respect to control. Cell death (○) was represented as % of cells with high PI fluorescence. Data in graphs are means ± S.E of at least n = 3. Kruskal-Wallis One Way ANOVA on Ranks, Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) post hoc test: a, p<0.05 compared to the corresponding control (no drug treatment).

Impairment of proteasomal activity by PQ is a late step in the cell death process

Previous studies have demonstrated that PD-related toxicants including PQ and MPP+ impair proteasomal activity [6465,3031,57]. We found that the activity of the proteasome decreased in lysates from cells treated with toxic PQ concentrations (≥ 0.5 mM) (Fig. 3a). However, due to the stochastic nature of cell death progression, this assay does not allow us to evaluate if changes in the activity of the proteasome occur prior to cell death, or if they are only an epiphenomenon associated with the loss of cellular viability. Thus, we evaluated the changes in the activity of the proteasome in intact cells using the cell permeable proteasome activity probe BodipyFL-Ahx3L3VS [49,48]. MG132 inhibits the processing of BodipyFL-Ahx3L3VS by the proteasome (Fig. 3c and Suppl. Fig. 3a). PQ (Fig.3b and 3c) and MPP+ (Suppl. Fig. 3b) induced a dose-dependent increase in proteasome activity. Accordingly, previous studies have reported that PQ and MPP+ induce an early increase in proteasomal activity [6668]. Thus, our results suggest that the impairment in proteasomal activity induced by PQ and other PD-related insults is a late event associated with the loss of cell viability. Accordingly, MG132 had no effect on PQ-, MPP+-, rotenone- or 6-OHDA-induced toxicity (Fig. 3d).

Fig. 3. Effects of PQ and MPP+ on the activity of the proteasome.

Fig. 3

Cells were treated with the indicated toxicants for 48 h. a. The proteasomal 20S chymotripsyn–like activity was evaluated in total cell lysates by evaluation of the changes in AMC fluorescence released from the hydrolysis of Suc-LLVY-AMC. The proteasome inhibitor MG132 was used as a positive control (5 µM for 6 h). Data are expressed as U/ml/mg protein. b. Changes in the activity of the proteasome were evaluated in live cells using the cell permeable proteasome substrate BodipyFL-Ahx3L3VS. Histograms represent the distribution of cells with different levels of BodipyFL-Ahx3L3VS fluorescence. c. The geometric mean of BodipyFL-Ahx3L3VS fluorescence intensity was quantified and represented as fold change with respect to control. MG132 was used as a positive control (0.2 µM for 16 h prior to the incubation with BodipyFL-Ahx3L3VS) . Background fluorescence (Control- in b) was subtracted. d. Cell death was determined in the presence or absence of MG132 (0.2 µM) by evaluating the loss of plasma membrane integrity (PI uptake) and represented as % of cells with high PI fluorescence. Data in graphs are means ± S.E of n = 3–5. Kruskal Wallis One-way ANOVA on ranks, Student Newman Keuls post hoc test: a, p<0.05; Mann Whitney Rank Sum t-test: *p<0.05 compared to the corresponding control (no drug treatment).

PQ reduces Ub-protein content but not Ub-mRNA transcription

The decrease in protein ubiquitination induced by PQ and MPP+ might be mediated by impairment in the activity of Ub-activating (E1s) and Ub-conjugating enzymes (E2s), and/or Ub-ligases (E3s). A decrease in the activity of these enzymes is translated in the accumulation of free Ub monomers/chains [69]. However, we found that treatment of cells with PQ induced a decrease in Ub-monomers (Fig. 4a and Suppl. Fig. 3c), suggesting that a decrease in the Ub-protein pool, rather than an impairment in the E1-E2-E3 system, is linked to the reduced levels of protein ubiquitination. Ub is encoded in mammals by 4 genes. UBA52 and RPS27A genes code for a single copy of Ub fused to ribosomal proteins, while the UBB and UBC genes code for poly-Ub precursor proteins. We evaluated if the reduction in Ub protein levels induced by PQ is mediated by a decrease in gene transcription. Surprisingly, a significant increase in UBB mRNA transcription/stability was observed at lower concentrations of PQ (≤ 0.2 mM) (Fig. 4b). These results demonstrate that Ub-protein synthesis or stability, but not Ub-gene transcription, is impaired by PQ.

Fig. 4. PQ impairs Ub-protein synthesis.

Fig. 4

a. Changes in the levels of Ub–monomers and free chains were evaluated by WB (18% Tris glycine gels) in lysates from SK-N-SH cells treated with PQ for 48 h. Cells were treated with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (0.2 µM) 24 h prior to analysis. Relative quantification of ubiquitinated proteins (numbers in italics) was normalized to β-actin and represented with respect to control. b. RT-PCR analysis of the changes in poly-ubiquitin gene UBB mRNA levels in cells treated with PQ for 48 h. Data were normalized using GAPDH as endogenous housekeeping gene. Results are expressed as changes in the relative expression level compared to the control (no PQ treatment). c. Ub–bound proteins were evaluated by WB in cells treated with CHX for 48 h in the presence or absence of the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (as explained in a). d. Cell death was determined in cells treated with PQ, in the presence or absence of CHX (100 µM) by evaluating the loss of plasma membrane integrity (PI uptake) and represented as % of cells with high PI fluorescence. Data in graphs are means ± S.E of n = 3–5. One-way ANOVA, Holm-Sidak post hoc test: a, p<0.05 compared to the corresponding control (no drug treatment). Two-way ANOVA, Holm-Sidak post hoc test: b, p<0.05 compared to the corresponding PQ concentration without CHX treatment.

We next evaluated the role of Ub-protein synthesis inhibition/depletion in PQ toxicity. Because Ub is encoded by 4 genes, its knockdown is experimentally cumbersome as reported in previous studies demonstrating that while UBB knockdown reduces Ub monomers by 70%, it only decreases Ub-bound proteins by 30% [70]. A previous study demonstrated that the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX) depletes cellular Ub resulting in a decrease in steady-state poly-ubiquitinated proteins [71]. Depletion of Ub-bound proteins was induced by CHX treatment (48 h, Fig. 4c), which only resulted in a slight increase in cell death (Fig. 4d). CHX significantly stimulated PQ toxicity (Fig. 4d), suggesting that Ub depletion, but not inactivation of the proteasome, contributes to PQ toxicity. Ub depletion by itself does not induce cell death, suggesting that additional events linked to PQ or MPP+ exposure (oxidative damage or mitochondrial dysfunction) in addition to impaired protein ubiquitination are required for cell death progression.

PQ-induced oxidized protein accumulation is not regulated by the proteasome

Clearance of oxidized proteins has been shown to be mediated by both Ub-dependent and -independent proteasomal degradation pathways [7273]. PQ induced a dose-dependent accumulation of sulfenylated protein cysteine residues (PSOH), irreversibly oxidized (sulfonylated PSO3H) DJ-1 and peroxiredoxins (Prxs), and protein carbonyls (Fig. 5a–c and Suppl. Fig. 4a–b). However, inhibition of the proteasome with MG132 did not increase further the accumulation of oxidized protein byproducts (Fig. 5a–c and Suppl. Fig. 4a–b), suggesting that the increased load in oxidized proteins is ascribed to impaired protein ubiquitination but not to a decrease in proteasomal activity. We have previously demonstrated that oxidative stress induced by MPP+ is primarily restricted to the mitochondria matrix [45]. Accordingly, no accumulation of oxidized DJ-1 or Prxs was observed upon exposure to MPP+.

Fig. 5. The accumulation of oxidized protein induced by PQ is not regulated by the proteasome.

Fig. 5

Cells were treated with PQ for 48 h in the presence or absence of 0.2 µM MG132 (as exemplified in Fig. 1a). a. PSOHs were determined in cells incubated with the PSOH selective probe dimedone prior to the analysis. PSOHs were visualized using the anti-PSOH modified Cysteine 2-Thiodimedone-specific antibody. b. Levels of irreversibly oxidized DJ-1 and Prxs (PSO3H) were detected by WB. Relative quantification of ubiquitinated proteins (numbers in italics) was normalized to β-actin and represented with respect to the indicated control. c. Protein carbonyls were detected by WB in total cell lysates derivatized with DNPH. Carbonylated proteins were detected using anti-DNP antibody. Graphs indicate the densitometry analysis of changes in the levels of PSOHs or protein carbonyls normalized to β-actin and expressed as fold change with respect to control. Data are means ± S.E of five independent experiments. Kruskal-Wallis One Way ANOVA on Ranks, Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) post hoc test: a, p<0.05 compared to the corresponding control (no drug treatment).

Dimerization of p62 parallels the impairment in protein ubiquitination and autophagy flux

Selective degradation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates is also mediated by autophagy via the Ub binding receptor p62 [10]. p62 binds to ubiquitinated proteins via its UBA C-terminal domain. Interestingly, the UBA domain, which has a low affinity for Ub, also mediates the formation of highly stable symmetrical inactive dimmers. p62 dimerization and Ub-binding are mutually exclusive [74]. Thus, we considered that Ub depletion induced by PQ might dimerize/inactivate p62. Inhibition of Ub activating enzymes (E1s) with Pyr 41 induced p62 dimerization (Fig. 6a and Suppl. Fig. 5a) [75]. PQ, and to a lesser extent MPP+ and 6-OHDA, but not rotenone also induced a dose-dependent dimerization of p62 (Fig. 6b and Suppl. Fig. 5b–c). Overexpression of a dominant negative form of ATG5 (dnATG5), which together with ATG12 and ATG16 is essential for autophagosome formation [76], enhanced p62 dimerization (Fig. 6b and Suppl. Fig. 5b). Overexpression of dnATG5 did not impair the decrease in ubiquitinated proteins/aggregates induced by PQ demonstrating that Ub-protein depletion parallels p62 dimerization (Fig. 6c).

Fig. 6. PQ treatment induces the dimerization/inactivation of p62 and impairs autophagy.

Fig. 6

a. Cells were treated with the Ub-conjugating enzyme inhibitor (E1) Pyr-41 for 24h. p62 dimerization (inactivation) was evaluated by WB. Dimerization of p62 is evidenced by an increase in p62 dimers with the concomitant decrease p62 monomers. b. p62 dimerization was also evaluated in cells treated with PQ for 48h. When indicated, cells were transduced with dnATG5 or Empty viruses (-dnATG5) 24 h before PQ treatment. Relative quantification of p62 dimerization was represented as p62 dimers / p62 monomers ratio, normalized to β-actin and expressed with respect to the indicated control (numbers in italics in a and b). c. Cells were treated as explained above (b) and ubiquitinated proteins and aggregates were evaluated by dot blot. Relative densitometry quantification of ubiquitinated proteins was normalized to β-actin and represented with respect to the indicated control (numbers in italics). d. Alterations in autophagy flux induced by PQ were determined by changes in the levels of the autophagosome marker LC3-II in the presence of CQ (40 µM, incubated 4 h prior to analysis), an inhibitor of lysosomal cargo degradation. Relative densitometry quantification of LC3-II (numbers in italics) was normalized to β-actin and represented with respect to the indicated control. e. Cell death was determined in cells treated with PQ, in the presence or absence of MG132 (0.2 µM). When indicated, cells were transduced with dnATG5 or Empty (- dnATG5) viruses 24 h before PQ treatment. Cell death was evaluated by the loss of plasma membrane integrity (PI uptake) and represented as % of cells with high PI fluorescence. Data are means ± S.E of n = 3–5. Two-way ANOVA, Holm-Sidak post hoc test analysis of data without MG132: a, p<0.05 dnATG5 vs Empty within the corresponding PQ category.

The accumulation of autophagosomes is evidenced by an increase in the levels of the microtubule–associated protein light chain (LC3–I) protein in its lipidated form (LC3–II). As previously reported [77,36,78], inhibition of the proteasome with MG132 induces autophagy (Suppl. Fig. 5d). We and others have previously demonstrated that PQ and the complex I inhibitors MPP+ and rotenone impair autophagy flux [3334,79], defined as the complete process beginning with the formation of the phagophore, and ending after the fusion of the autophagosomes with the lysosome for the degradation of lysosomal cargo [46,9]. Autophagy flux was inferred by WB analysis of LC3–II turnover in the presence of cloroquine (CQ), the inhibitor of lysosomal cargo degradation that specifically inhibits the acid-dependent breakdown of autolysosome content without affecting autophagosome–lysosome fusion, which results in the accumulation of autophagolysosomes that cannot be cleared [46]. Fig. 6d and Suppl. Fig. 5e–f corroborate that PQ induces a dose- and time-dependent impairment in autophagy flux. We have previously demonstrated that overexpression of dnATG5 inhibits autophagy and potentiates PQ and MPP+ toxicity [33]. Protein degradation mechanisms are complementary, and dysregulation of either the UPS or autophagy has been reported to be mutually compensated, particularly in the clearance of aggregated proteins linked to neurodegenerative disorders [3536,8085]. While inhibition of autophagy with dnATG5 overexpression stimulated PQ toxicity, MG132 exerted no additional toxicity when combined with dnATG5 overexpression Fig. 6e. These results demonstrate that Ub-protein depletion induced by PQ and MPP+ is linked to the inactivation of p62 that precedes the decrease in autophagy flux. Autophagy but not the proteasome regulates the progression of PQ and MPP+-induced dopaminergic cell death.

Paraquat increases the pathological accumulation of α-synuclein in dopaminergic cells and membrane-associated foci in yeast

Clearance of misfolded/aggregated α-synuclein has been shown to be mediated by both autophagy and the ubiquitin/proteasome pathways [86,8485]. Previous studies have reported that PQ upregulates the levels of α-synuclein [8790,34]. We observed no effect of PQ on the total endogenous levels of α-synuclein in SK-N-SH dopaminergic cells (data not shown) or in PQ treated C57Bl/6 (Fig. 7a). Thus we evaluated if PQ could alter the pathological accumulation of α-synuclein when overexpressed (as a PD model of SNCA multiplication) or when mutated. Overexpression of α-synuclein (WT or A53T mutant) in SK-N-SH cells for 72 h, in the presence or absence of PQ did not induce the accumulation of HMW aggregates of α-synuclein (SDS-PAGE analysis of whole cell lysates containing soluble and insoluble fractions), but it increased the accumulation α-synuclein in its monomeric form (Fig. 7b). α-synuclein is reported to exist predominantly as stable unfolded monomers that migrate as 57–60 kDa proteins (Fig.7c). It is unclear whether the larger than expected size of the bands is a result from the monomers adopting an unfolded extended conformation, which results in a larger than expected hydrodynamic radius [9193], or if it represents a fraction of α-synuclein existing as a stable tetramer [9495]. We have previously demonstrated that inhibition of the proteasome promotes the accumulation of α-synuclein in this unfolded state (or tetramer) and the appearance of a band with enhanced lower MW [43]. Similarly, PQ induced the accumulation of unlfoded α-synuclein (Fig. 7c) and the accumulation of a low MW band immunoreactive for α-synuclein (depicted with * in Fig. 7c).

Figure 7. Effect of PQ on α-synuclein accumulation and distribution.

Figure 7

a. WB analysis of α-synuclein levels in the midbrain of C57Bl/6 mice treated for 9 weeks with PQ or PBS. b-c. Cells were transduced with Ad-Empty, Ad-α-synuclein or Ad-A53T for 24h (3 MOI), washed and then treated with or without PQ (48 h). Whole cell lysates or TX-100 insoluble fractions were analyzed by SDS (b) or BN--PAGE (c), respectively, and α-synuclein was visualized by WB. Numbers (italics) represent the densitometry analysis normalized to β-actin with respect to the corresponding control. d. Wild-type S. cerevisiae cells containing genome-integrated human α-synuclein-GFP expression cassette under the control of GAL1 promoter were cultured in the medium containing 2% glucose or 2% galactose. The galactose-grown cells were then treated with the indicated amounts of PQ for 1 h (acute treatment), 48 h (chronic treatment). Subcellular distribution of α-synuclein-GFP was visualized by confocal microscopy. Shown are representative images of cells that have been acutely treated with PQ. Scale bars are 5 µm. Arrows indicate membrane associated foci of α-synuclein-GFP. Bar graphs show quantitation of α-synuclein-GFP foci. At least 300 cells per condition, per sample were analyzed. e. Yeast cultures described above were diluted to 300 cells and plated for survival on glucose- or galactose-containing plates with or without PQ. Following 4-days incubation at 28°C, the plates were inspected for colony forming units and the presence of small, degenerative colonies. The left panel shows representative images of cell growth on galactose plates with and without 1 mM PQ. Arrows indicate degenerative colonies. The panels on the right show quantitation of cell survival and percentage of degenerative colonies on glucose and galactose-containing plates containing the indicated amounts of PQ. Bar graphs are means ± S.D. (n=4); *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 by unpaired t-test.

To further interrogate the effect of PQ on α-synuclein distribution we used the budding yeast S. cerevisiae genetic model overexpressing an inducible promoter-driven fusion of α-synuclein-GFP. Yeast has been extensively used as a valid experimental platform to elucidate the fundamental mechanisms associated with neurodegenerative diseases [96]. The inducible expression of α-synuclein can result in no toxicity, intermediate toxicity, or high toxicity in relation to the levels of α-synuclein being expressed. α-synuclein-GFP overexpressed in yeast at non-toxic levels localizes at the plasma membrane, consistent with its known affinity to phospholipids (Fig. 7d). This is the expected localization of a protein that localizes at synaptic vesicles in neurons, when considering that yeast has constitutive vesicular secretion [96]. Acute or chronic treatment of yeast cells with PQ induced the accumulation of membrane associated foci (Fig. 7d). While α-synuclein overexpression had no effect in SK-N-SH (not shown) or yeast cell death induced by PQ (Fig. 7e), in yeast it induced the formation of degenerative colonies (Fig. 7e) (smaller in size and impeded in their ability to propagate normally). These results suggest that the accumulation of monomeric α-synuclein and its localization at the plasma membrane is regulated by PQ.

DISCUSSION

The etiology of PD involves the convergence of aging, genetic and environmental risk factors [54,97]. A disruption in protein quality control mechanisms is linked to the accumulation of protein inclusions and neuronal cell loss observed in neurodegenerative disorders including PD [98,2]. Ub selectively targets cargo to the three major protein degradation pathways, the proteasome, the lysosome, and the autophagosome [99], and environmental/mitochondrial toxicants inhibit the activity of the proteasome and impair autophagy flux [57,33]. However, the effects of environmental/mitochondrial toxicants on other components of Ub-dependent protein degradation pathways have not been studied in detail, and inhibition of the proteasome is still considered the major mechanism involved in the impairment of the Ub-dependent degradation of misfolded/damage proteins. In this work, we demonstrated that impaired protein ubiquitination is an early and central step in the impairment of protein degradation pathways induced by PQ and MPP+. The depletion of the Ub protein pool induced by both agents was observed at both sub-toxic and toxic (subchronic) exposures and was not cell type specific. Furthermore, Ub-protein depletion was paralleled by the inactivation of p62 and in the case of PQ, the accumulation of oxidized protein byproducts and alterations in the levels of monomeric α-synuclein and its distribution at the plasma membrane (Fig. 8). These results might explain the heterogeneity of protein inclusions in PD brains (LBs), particularly, the presence of Ub–negative protein inclusions [67].

Fig. 8. PQ- and MPP+-induced Ub-protein depletion and p62 inactivation are early steps in the impairment of Ub-dependent protein degradation pathways (UPS and autophagy).

Fig. 8

Our data suggests that PD-related toxicants PQ and MPP+ deplete the Ub protein pool (red arrow) by a mechanism that might involve oxidative mRNA damage, energy failure, or altered Ub protein stability. Ub depletion leads to the inactivation (dimerization) of the ubiquitin binding receptor p62 that directs ubiquitinated cargo for degradation via the authophagosome-lysosome pathway. Ub-protein depletion and p62 inactivation impair Ub-dependent protein degradation pathways, and parallel the accumulation of oxidized/misfolded proteins (yellow arrows) and alterations in the levels/distribution of α-synuclein (not exemplified). Severe/chronic oxidative stress and/or energy failure induced by environmental and mitochondrial toxicants would eventually lead to a decrease in the activity of the proteasome and impaired autophagy flux (red crosses).

A decrease in the activity of the proteasome has been found in PD brains [100103]. Previous studies have also demonstrated that environmental and mitochondrial toxins including PQ and MPP+ impair the activity of the proteasome by: 1) direct inhibition of the proteasome, 2) mitochondrial dysfunction and energy depletion, or 3) oxidative stress [64,30,104,31,57]. Similar to previous reports [34,30,105,31] we observed that high and toxic PQ concentrations induced a decrease in the chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome. However, biochemical assays of proteasomal activity are usually done in lysates from cell samples (or PD tissues), where the decrease in proteasome activity might be confounded by the loss of cells (viability). Using a novel cell-permeable proteasomal substrate (BodipyFL-Ahx3L3VS), we found that both sub-toxic and toxic concentrations of PQ and MPP+ increase the activity of the proteasome prior to cell death. Interestingly, previous studies have demonstrated that MPP+-induced dopaminergic cell death actually requires an increase in the activity of the proteasome [6667]. Our findings do not argue against previous studies demonstrating that impairment in proteasome activity is induced by PD-related toxicants [64,30,104,31,57]. However, our results suggest that inhibition of the proteasome by environmental / mitochondrial toxicants might be a late event only ascribed to the loss of cell viability. As such, inhibition of the proteasome had no effect on PQ or MPP+ induced toxicity. Accordingly, previous in vivo studies using the MPP+ precursor 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) found no stimulating effect of proteasome inhibition on dopaminergic cell death [106].

Previous reports have demonstrated that PD-related toxicants induce the accumulation of Ub-bound protein aggregates, which has been ascribed primarily to proteasome inhibition by these agents [3032,104,5657]. In vivo, MPTP has been shown to induce both an increase and a decrease in the levels of Ub-bound proteins using different experimental paradigms [32,107]. While we did observe a slight increase in the accumulation of the UPS fluorescent substrate GFPµ, this transient increase seems to precede the late decrease in proteasomal activity. Proteasomal activity is very robust and GFPµ accumulation induced by proteasome inhibitors has been reported to require about 70% inhibition of proteasomal activity [47]. Thus, our results are more consistent with the notion that the transient increase in GFPµ accumulation is primarily linked to impaired ubiquitination and not to the inhibition of the proteasome.

We demonstrated here that the primary effect of acute or prolonged treatment with PQ and MPP+ at either high (toxic) or low (sub-toxic) doses is a decrease in protein ubiquitination (Fig. 8). We and others have previously shown that chronic inhibition of the proteasome depletes cells from Ub [108,43,109]. Bence et al. found that the GFPµ fluorescence rapidly declined in cells after the exposure to a protein-synthesis inhibitor due to the impaired synthesis of short–lived proteins such as GFPµ [6162]. However, PQ-induced Ub-protein depletion seems to precede the inhibition of the proteasome, discarding a possible negative feedback loop from the proteasome to Ub-protein synthesis. Interestingly, while MPP+ reduced protein ubiquitination, rotenone (another complex I inhibitor) had no such effect, which adds to the cumulative evidence that the toxicity induced by MPP+ and rotenone might actually involve different mechanisms [33,45,110115].

Levels of endogenous Ub-conjugates depend on the balance between 1) the rate of Ub conjugation determined by the availability of Ub, the activity of the E1-E2-E3 system and ATP levels; and 2) the rate of the turnover of Ub-conjugates (degradation/deubiquitination), which depends on the activity of the proteasome, autophagy and deubiquitinating enzymes [99]. Several components of the UPS can present different sensitivities to oxidative damage/modulation [116123]. Deubiquitinating enzymes are inhibited by oxidation of their catalytic cysteine residue [124125]. The proteasome has been reported to be more susceptible to oxidative inhibition than Ub-conjugating enzymes [126,116,127]. Accordingly, mild to moderate oxidative stress upregulates Ub and the Ub-conjugating system promoting the formation of Ub-conjugates, and reducing the activity of the proteasome. In contrast, extensive but not lethal oxidative stress reduces the formation of Ub-conjugates by inactivating Ub–conjugating enzymes promoting the accumulation/aggregation of damaged/abnormal proteins [126]. While it is possible that PQ might interfere with the activity of the Ub-conjugating system (E1, E2 and E3s), this should have been translated into the accumulation of Ub monomers/free chains. In contrast, PQ clearly depleted cells from Ub even at sub-toxic concentrations. Thus, our results imply that PQ-induced depletion of Ub-bound proteins is associated with a decrease in the Ub-protein pool.

While PQ clearly reduced the Ub-protein pool, Ub mRNA levels were shown to increase in response to PQ, which is consistent with the notion that Ub is a stress-inducible protein [70,128]. These findings suggest that PQ or MPP+ might impair the synthesis of Ub at the post-transcriptional level or modify Ub protein stability. Protein synthesis has been shown to be more sensitive to oxidative stress than DNA/RNA synthesis [129]. Ub-protein depletion induced by PQ and MPP+ was also paralleled by a decrease in GFPµ fluorescence in stable cells. Thus, our results indicate that PQ and MPP+ are likely impairing overall protein synthesis, which should initially affect short-lived proteins such as Ub and GFPµ (Fig. 8). MPP+ has been previously shown to inhibit protein synthesis [130], but the mechanisms involved remain unknown. PQ and MPP+ induce oxidative stress and energy failure, which can affect overall protein synthesis. The correct attachment of amino acids to each tRNA species that is required for protein synthesis is an energy-dependent process carried out by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Additionally, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases also hydrolyze (edit) an incorrectly attached amino acid, and oxidative stress induces protein mistranslation and degradation by impairment of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase editing [131]. Oxidative stress also diverts tRNA synthetases to the nucleus to protect against oxidative damage [132]. Moreover, oxidized mRNA, protein mistranslation and subsequent degradation have been recently recognized as important contributors to neurodegeneration [133138]. To determine whether energy failure, oxidative stress or both impair Ub-protein synthesis will require further investigation. However, we have demonstrated here and in previous studies that oxidative stress induced by MPP+ and low PQ concentrations is primarily ascribed to mitochondria [45], suggesting that energy failure might be the primary mechanism involved in impaired protein (Ub) synthesis.

An increased accumulation of oxidized protein byproducts is found in PD brains. Elevated levels of carbonylated proteins [139] and cysteine oxidized proteins including the hydrogen peroxide scavengers Prxs and the early onset PD-related protein-gene DJ-1/PARK7 [140142] are important oxidative biomarkers detected in PD brains. We observed that PQ induced an increase in the accumulation of PSOH, precursors of irreversibly oxidative protein sulfinic (PSO2H) and PSO3H acid modifications. Accordingly, PQ also induced a dose-dependent accumulation of irreversibly oxidized DJ-1-SO3H and Prxs-SO3H, as well as protein carbonyls. Both DJ-1 and Prx turnover has been proposed to be mediated by the UPS [143145]. Cysteine sulfenylation at the N-terminus of proteins is an important step in the endoproteolytic cleavage and formation of N-degrons recognized by the UPS [146]. Both Ub-dependent and Ub-independent degradation of oxidized proteins has been reported [7273,126,147,22]. Accumulation of oxidized proteins in the absence of Ub-bound protein aggregates suggests that ubiquitination might be required for the degradation of oxidized proteins induced by PQ. Aging is the main risk factor in the development of PD [148]. Similar to our results, it was observed that in an aging yeast model poly-ubiquitinated proteins are significantly reduced even in the presence of a decrease in proteasomal activity leading to an increase/accumulation of oxidized proteins [149]. Moreover, a decrease in Ub-conjugates as well as in de novo Ub conjugation activity was reported in lenses from aged rats, and these effects were associated with the accumulation of damaged proteins [150].

It has been recently recognized the important role that autophagy plays in the degradation of ubiquitinated cargo. Both the UPS and autophagy play complementary roles in the degradation of misfolded protein aggregates such as α-synuclein [2,151152,84,86]. Heavily oxidized stable protein aggregates are not suitable for proteasomal degradation, and autophagy is thought to also play a major role in the degradation of oxidized protein aggregates [1920]. The UPS and autophagy are complementary pathways, where alterations in the rate of one system are reported to modify those of the other one. In particular, impairment of the UPS system triggers autophagy [8283,153]. Interestingly, while contradicting results exist regarding the ability of proteasome inhibitors to induce selective neurodegeneration [154159], impairment of autophagy seems to selectively induce dopaminergic cell loss in vivo [1213,160]. Indeed we observed that MG132 induces autophagy. However, whereas inhibition of ATG5-dependent autophagy stimulated PQ and MPP+ toxicity no additional effect was induced by proteasome inhibition. The fact that inhibition of autophagy stimulates PQ and MPP+ toxicity without exerting an effect on the accumulation of Ub-bound proteins (this work and [33]), suggests that the protective effects of autophagy are independent from its role in protein degradation.

Ubiquitinated proteins are selectively targeted to the autophagosome-lysosome system via Ub binding proteins, primarily p62/SQSTM [99,10]. p62 has been found in LBs from PD and dementia with LBs (DLB) brains [161164], neurofibrillary tangles from Alzheimer’s disease brains, and in Huntingtin aggregates [4,165166]. Likewise, it has been shown that α-synuclein inclusions and oxidized proteins can be degraded through the p62-dependent autophagy clearance [164,21]. A recent report demonstrated that the UBA domain, which has a low affinity for Ub, also mediates the formation of inactive p62 dimmers, and that p62 dimerization and Ub-binding are mutually exclusives [74]. In our study, we found that the inhibition of Ub-activating enzymes (E1s) and the depletion of the Ub-protein pool induced by PQ and MPP+ are paralleled by p62 inactivation/dimerization (Fig. 8). As we reported before [33], PQ and MPP+ induce a dose- and time-dependent impairment in autophagy flux. Thus, our results suggest that p62 inactivation by Ub-protein depletion might be a mechanism by which PQ and MPP+ also impair autophagy (Fig. 8). p62 has been reported to regulate mitophagy and stress response signaling via the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) and nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2) among others [14,74,167169]. It is likely that p62 dimerization might be regulating the stress response of cells treated with PQ and MPP+, and we expect to address this in the future.

Clearance of misfolded/aggregated α-synuclein has been shown to be mediated by both autophagy and the ubiquitin/proteasome pathways [86,8485]. Ubiquitination of α-synuclein by E3 Ub-ligases (seven in absentia homologue-1 [SIAH1], E6 associated protein [E6-AP], neural precursor cell expressed developmentally down-regulated protein 4 [Nedd4], tumor necrosis factor-receptor associated factor 6 [TRAF6]) has been proposed to regulate its degradation via the proteasome or endosomal-lysosomal degradation pathways [170174].Interestingly, Ub-independent α-synuclein degradation via the 20S proteasome has also been reported [175]. Recent studies have demonstrated that ubiquitination of α-synuclein in different lysine residues mediates diverse effects including the formation of protein inclusions or Lewy bodies [176178], which is now considered a protective mechanism against the accumulation of toxic protofibrillar intermediates, as aggregation of α-synuclein might be required for its detoxification [179]. PQ alone had no effect on the endogenous α-synuclein levels, but when WT or mutant A53T α-synuclein were overexpressed, PQ induced an increase accumulation of α-synuclein in its monomeric form. Indeed, ubiquitination of monomeric and fibrillar α-synuclein has been reported previously [180]. Furthermore, we observed that in yeast cells, where α-synuclein is localized at the plasma membrane, PQ treatment induced the accumulation of membrane foci, suggesting that alterations in protein ubiquitination might alter membrane sorting or turnover of α-synuclein. In fact it has been demonstrated that in yeast, localization of α-synuclein to the plasma membrane requires the secretory pathway [181], and α-synuclein was also reported to be ubiquitinated by Nedd4 [170], a homologous to the E6-AP carboxyl terminus [HECT]-domain E3 that functions at the plasma membrane in the turnover/sorting of a number of membrane-associated proteins [182].

Overall, our results uncover a new mechanism by which environmental (PQ) and mitochondrial toxicants (MPP+) impair Ub-dependent proteostatic mechanisms. Post-transcriptional depletion of the Ub-protein pool impairs both proteasome and p62-autophagy mediated protein degradation pathways. Depletion of the Ub protein pool seems to be associated with the accumulation of oxidized proteins, alterations in the levels/distribution of α-synuclein, and precede the impairment in proteasome activity and autophagy flux (Fig. 8).

Supplementary Material

1

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grants P20RR17675, Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE), GM108975 (O.K.), the Scientist Development Grant of the American Heart Association (12SDG12090015), the Office of Research of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, and by the National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACYT) Grant #104316. JNY was supported by a CONACYT scholarship #219185. We would like to thank the Flow Cytometry Core Facility from the Nebraska Center for Virology for the access to the flow cytometry instrumentation (NIGMS grant number P30 GM103509) and the personnel at the Life Science Annex at UNL. EB was supported by the Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine (CVM) Summer Scholar Research Program (NIH 2T35OD012199-11A1).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Tanaka K, Matsuda N. Proteostasis and neurodegeneration: the roles of proteasomal degradation and autophagy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1843(1):197–204. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.03.012. doi:S0167-4889(13)00111-0 [pii] 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cook C, Stetler C, Petrucelli L. Disruption of protein quality control in Parkinson’s disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2(5):a009423. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a009423. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a009423a009423 [pii] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wakabayashi K, Tanji K, Odagiri S, Miki Y, Mori F, Takahashi H. The Lewy body in Parkinson’s disease and related neurodegenerative disorders. Mol Neurobiol. 2013;47(2):495–508. doi: 10.1007/s12035-012-8280-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zatloukal K, Stumptner C, Fuchsbichler A, Heid H, Schnoelzer M, Kenner L, Kleinert R, Prinz M, Aguzzi A, Denk H. p62 Is a common component of cytoplasmic inclusions in protein aggregation diseases. Am J Pathol. 2002;160(1):255–263. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64369-6. doi:S0002-9440(10)64369-6 [pii] 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64369-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kuzuhara S, Mori H, Izumiyama N, Yoshimura M, Ihara Y. Lewy bodies are ubiquitinated. A light and electron microscopic immunocytochemical study. Acta Neuropathol. 1988;75(4):345–353. doi: 10.1007/BF00687787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Spillantini MG, Crowther RA, Jakes R, Hasegawa M, Goedert M. alpha-Synuclein in filamentous inclusions of Lewy bodies from Parkinson’s disease and dementia with lewy bodies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1998;95(11):6469–6473. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.11.6469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gomez-Tortosa E, Newell K, Irizarry MC, Sanders JL, Hyman BT. alpha-Synuclein immunoreactivity in dementia with Lewy bodies: morphological staging and comparison with ubiquitin immunostaining. Acta neuropathologica. 2000;99(4):352–357. doi: 10.1007/s004010051135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Choi AM, Ryter SW, Levine B. Autophagy in human health and disease. The New England journal of medicine. 2013;368(7):651–662. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1205406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Navarro-Yepes J, Burns M, Anandhan A, Khalimonchuk O, del Razo LM, Quintanilla-Vega B, Pappa A, Panayiotidis MI, Franco R. Oxidative stress, redox signaling, and autophagy: cell death versus survival. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014;21(1):66–85. doi: 10.1089/ars.2014.5837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shaid S, Brandts CH, Serve H, Dikic I. Ubiquitination and selective autophagy. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20(1):21–30. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2012.72. doi:cdd201272 [pii] 10.1038/cdd.2012.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rogov V, Dotsch V, Johansen T, Kirkin V. Interactions between autophagy receptors and ubiquitin-like proteins form the molecular basis for selective autophagy. Molecular cell. 2014;53(2):167–178. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.12.014. doi:S1097-2765(13)00904-0 [pii] 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ahmed I, Liang Y, Schools S, Dawson VL, Dawson TM, Savitt JM. Development and characterization of a new Parkinson’s disease model resulting from impaired autophagy. J Neurosci. 2012;32(46):16503–16509. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0209-12.2012. doi:32/46/16503 [pii] 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0209-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Friedman LG, Lachenmayer ML, Wang J, He L, Poulose SM, Komatsu M, Holstein GR, Yue Z. Disrupted autophagy leads to dopaminergic axon and dendrite degeneration and promotes presynaptic accumulation of alpha-synuclein and LRRK2 in the brain. J Neurosci. 2012;32(22):7585–7593. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5809-11.2012. doi:32/22/7585 [pii] 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5809-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Komatsu M, Kageyama S, Ichimura Y. p62/SQSTM1/A170: physiology and pathology. Pharmacol Res. 2012;66(6):457–462. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2012.07.004. doi:S1043-6618(12)00143-0 [pii] 10.1016/j.phrs.2012.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Watanabe Y, Tanaka M. p62/SQSTM1 in autophagic clearance of a non-ubiquitylated substrate. J Cell Sci. 2011;124(Pt 16):2692–2701. doi: 10.1242/jcs.081232. doi:jcs.081232 [pii] 10.1242/jcs.081232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gal J, Strom AL, Kwinter DM, Kilty R, Zhang J, Shi P, Fu W, Wooten MW, Zhu H. Sequestosome 1/p62 links familial ALS mutant SOD1 to LC3 via an ubiquitin-independent mechanism. Journal of neurochemistry. 2009;111(4):1062–1073. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06388.x. doi:JNC6388 [pii] 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06388.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Seibenhener ML, Babu JR, Geetha T, Wong HC, Krishna NR, Wooten MW. Sequestosome 1/p62 is a polyubiquitin chain binding protein involved in ubiquitin proteasome degradation. Molecular and cellular biology. 2004;24(18):8055–8068. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.18.8055-8068.2004. doi:10.1128/MCB.24.18.8055-8068.200424/18/8055 [pii] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Babu JR, Geetha T, Wooten MW. Sequestosome 1/p62 shuttles polyubiquitinated tau for proteasomal degradation. Journal of neurochemistry. 2005;94(1):192–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03181.x. doi:JNC3181 [pii] 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03181.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dunlop RA, Brunk UT, Rodgers KJ. Oxidized proteins: mechanisms of removal and consequences of accumulation. IUBMB Life. 2009;61(5):522–527. doi: 10.1002/iub.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chondrogianni N, Petropoulos I, Grimm S, Georgila K, Catalgol B, Friguet B, Grune T, Gonos ES. Protein damage, repair and proteolysis. Mol Aspects Med. 2012 doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2012.09.001. doi:S0098-2997(12)00127-6 [pii] 10.1016/j.mam.2012.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang L, Cano M, Handa JT. p62 provides dual cytoprotection against oxidative stress in the retinal pigment epithelium. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1843(7):1248–1258. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.03.016. doi:S0167-4889(14)00100-1 [pii] 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.03.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Marques C, Pereira P, Taylor A, Liang JN, Reddy VN, Szweda LI, Shang F. Ubiquitin-dependent lysosomal degradation of the HNE-modified proteins in lens epithelial cells. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2004;18(12):1424–1426. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-1743fje. doi:10.1096/fj.04-1743fje04-1743fje [pii] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Klein C, Westenberger A. Genetics of Parkinson’s disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2(1):a008888. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a008888. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a008888a008888 [pii] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tanner CM, Kamel F, Ross GW, Hoppin JA, Goldman SM, Korell M, Marras C, Bhudhikanok GS, Kasten M, Chade AR, Comyns K, Richards MB, Meng C, Priestley B, Fernandez HH, Cambi F, Umbach DM, Blair A, Sandler DP, Langston JW. Rotenone, paraquat, and Parkinson’s disease. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(6):866–872. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kamel F. Epidemiology. Paths from pesticides to Parkinson’s. Science. 2013;341(6147):722–723. doi: 10.1126/science.1243619. doi:341/6147/722 [pii] 10.1126/science.1243619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.van der Mark M, Brouwer M, Kromhout H, Nijssen P, Huss A, Vermeulen R. Is pesticide use related to Parkinson disease? Some clues to heterogeneity in study results. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(3):340–347. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Caudle WM, Guillot TS, Lazo CR, Miller GW. Industrial toxicants and Parkinson’s disease. Neurotoxicology. 2012;33(2):178–188. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2012.01.010. doi:S0161-813X(12)00025-3 [pii] 10.1016/j.neuro.2012.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jang H, Boltz DA, Webster RG, Smeyne RJ. Viral parkinsonism. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1792(7):714–721. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2008.08.001. doi:S0925-4439(08)00156-7 [pii] 10.1016/j.bbadis.2008.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gorell JM, Rybicki BA, Cole Johnson C, Peterson EL. Occupational metal exposures and the risk of Parkinson’s disease. Neuroepidemiology. 1999;18(6):303–308. doi: 10.1159/000026225. doi:26225 [pii] 26225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Caneda-Ferron B, De Girolamo LA, Costa T, Beck KE, Layfield R, Billett EE. Assessment of the direct and indirect effects of MPP+ and dopamine on the human proteasome: implications for Parkinson’s disease aetiology. Journal of neurochemistry. 2008;105(1):225–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.05130.x. doi:JNC5130 [pii] 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.05130.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yang W, Tiffany-Castiglioni E. The bipyridyl herbicide paraquat induces proteasome dysfunction in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. Journal of toxicology and environmental health Part A. 2007;70(21):1849–1857. doi: 10.1080/15287390701459262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fornai F, Schluter OM, Lenzi P, Gesi M, Ruffoli R, Ferrucci M, Lazzeri G, Busceti CL, Pontarelli F, Battaglia G, Pellegrini A, Nicoletti F, Ruggieri S, Paparelli A, Sudhof TC. Parkinson-like syndrome induced by continuous MPTP infusion: convergent roles of the ubiquitin-proteasome system and alpha-synuclein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102(9):3413–3418. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409713102. doi:0409713102 [pii] 10.1073/pnas.0409713102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Garcia-Garcia A, Anandhan A, Burns M, Chen H, Zhou Y, Franco R. Impairment of Atg5-Dependent Autophagic Flux Promotes Paraquat- and MPP+-Induced Apoptosis But Not Rotenone or 6-Hydroxydopamine Toxicity. Toxicol Sci. 2013;136(1):166–182. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kft188. doi:kft188 [pii] 10.1093/toxsci/kft188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wills J, Credle J, Oaks AW, Duka V, Lee JH, Jones J, Sidhu A. Paraquat, but not maneb, induces synucleinopathy and tauopathy in striata of mice through inhibition of proteasomal and autophagic pathways. PloS one. 2012;7(1):e30745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pandey UB, Nie Z, Batlevi Y, McCray BA, Ritson GP, Nedelsky NB, Schwartz SL, DiProspero NA, Knight MA, Schuldiner O, Padmanabhan R, Hild M, Berry DL, Garza D, Hubbert CC, Yao TP, Baehrecke EH, Taylor JP. HDAC6 rescues neurodegeneration and provides an essential link between autophagy and the UPS. Nature. 2007;447(7146):859–863. doi: 10.1038/nature05853. doi:nature05853 [pii] 10.1038/nature05853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Janen SB, Chaachouay H, Richter-Landsberg C. Autophagy is activated by proteasomal inhibition and involved in aggresome clearance in cultured astrocytes. Glia. 2010;58(14):1766–1774. doi: 10.1002/glia.21047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lei S, Zavala-Flores L, Garcia-Garcia A, Nandakumar R, Huang Y, Madayiputhiya N, Stanton RC, Dodds ED, Powers R, Franco R. Alterations in Energy/Redox Metabolism Induced by Mitochondrial and Environmental Toxins: A Specific Role for Glucose-6-Phosphate-Dehydrogenase and the Pentose Phosphate Pathway in Paraquat Toxicity. ACS Chem Biol. 2014 doi: 10.1021/cb400894a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Scholz D, Poltl D, Genewsky A, Weng M, Waldmann T, Schildknecht S, Leist M. Rapid, complete and large-scale generation of post-mitotic neurons from the human LUHMES cell line. Journal of neurochemistry. 2011;119(5):957–971. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07255.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rodriguez-Rocha H, Garcia-Garcia A, Zavala-Flores L, Li S, Madayiputhiya N, Franco R. Glutaredoxin 1 protects dopaminergic cells by increased protein glutathionylation in experimental Parkinson’s disease. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2012 doi: 10.1089/ars.2011.4474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Seo YH, Carroll KS. Profiling protein thiol oxidation in tumor cells using sulfenic acid-specific antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(38):16163–16168. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903015106. doi:0903015106 [pii] 10.1073/pnas.0903015106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Luo S, Wehr NB. Protein carbonylation: avoiding pitfalls in the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine assay. Redox Rep. 2009;14(4):159–166. doi: 10.1179/135100009X392601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Levine RL, Williams JA, Stadtman ER, Shacter E. Carbonyl assays for determination of oxidatively modified proteins. Methods in enzymology. 1994;233:346–357. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(94)33040-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Anandhan A, Rodriguez-Rocha H, Bohovych I, Griggs AM, Zavala-Flores L, Reyes-Reyes EM, Seravalli J, Stanciu LA, Lee J, Rochet J, Khalimonchuk O, Franco R. Overexpression of alpha-synuclein at non-toxic levels increases dopaminergic cell death induced by copper exposure via modulation of protein degradation pathways. Neurobiol Dis. 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.11.018. doi:S0969-9961(14)00364-7 [pii] 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Myeku N, Metcalfe MJ, Huang Q, Figueiredo-Pereira M. Assessment of proteasome impairment and accumulation/aggregation of ubiquitinated proteins in neuronal cultures. Methods Mol Biol 793:273-296. 2011 doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-328-8_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rodriguez-Rocha H, Garcia-Garcia A, Pickett C, Li S, Jones J, Chen H, Webb B, Choi J, Zhou Y, Zimmerman MC, Franco R. Compartmentalized oxidative stress in dopaminergic cell death induced by pesticides and complex I inhibitors: Distinct roles of superoxide anion and superoxide dismutases. Free Radic Biol Med 61C:370-383. 2013 doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.04.021. doi:S0891-5849(13)00161-5 [pii] 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Garcia-Garcia A, Anandhan A, Burns M, Chen H, Zhou Y, Franco R. Impairment of Atg5-dependent autophagic flux promotes paraquat- and MPP(+)-induced apoptosis but not rotenone or 6-hydroxydopamine toxicity. Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology. 2013;136(1):166–182. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kft188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bence NF, Bennett EJ, Kopito RR. Application and analysis of the GFPu family of ubiquitin-proteasome system reporters. Methods in enzymology 399:481-490. 2005 doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)99033-2. doi:S0076-6879(05)99033-2 [pii] 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)99033-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Berkers CR, van Leeuwen FW, Groothuis TA, Peperzak V, van Tilburg EW, Borst J, Neefjes JJ, Ovaa H. Profiling proteasome activity in tissue with fluorescent probes. Mol Pharm. 2007;4(5):739–748. doi: 10.1021/mp0700256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.de Jong A, Schuurman KG, Rodenko B, Ovaa H, Berkers CR. Fluorescence-based proteasome activity profiling. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;803:183–204. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-364-6_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Yang L, Li P, Fu S, Calay ES, Hotamisligil GS. Defective hepatic autophagy in obesity promotes ER stress and causes insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2010;11(6):467–478. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.04.005. doi:S1550-4131(10)00116-6 [pii] 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Liu F, Hindupur J, Nguyen JL, Ruf KJ, Zhu J, Schieler JL, Bonham CC, Wood KV, Davisson VJ, Rochet JC. Methionine sulfoxide reductase A protects dopaminergic cells from Parkinson’s disease-related insults. Free Radic Biol Med. 2008;45(3):242–255. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.03.022. doi:S0891-5849(08)00171-8 [pii] 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.03.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Barde I, Salmon P, Trono D. Production and titration of lentiviral vectors. Curr Protoc Neurosci Chapter 4:Unit 4 21. 2010 doi: 10.1002/0471142301.ns0421s53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Srivastava G, Dixit A, Yadav S, Patel DK, Prakash O, Singh MP. Resveratrol potentiates cytochrome P450 2 d22-mediated neuroprotection in maneb- and paraquat-induced parkinsonism in the mouse. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;52(8):1294–1306. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.02.005. doi:S0891-5849(12)00082-2 [pii] 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Goldman SM. Environmental toxins and Parkinson’s disease. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014;54:141–164. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-011613-135937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Subramaniam SR, Chesselet MF. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in Parkinson’s disease. Prog Neurobiol. 2013;106–107:17–32. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.04.004. doi:S0301-0082(13)00040-3 [pii] 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Betarbet R, Sherer TB, MacKenzie G, Garcia-Osuna M, Panov AV, Greenamyre JT. Chronic systemic pesticide exposure reproduces features of Parkinson’s disease. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3(12):1301–1306. doi: 10.1038/81834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sun F, Kanthasamy A, Anantharam V, Kanthasamy AG. Environmental neurotoxic chemicals-induced ubiquitin proteasome system dysfunction in the pathogenesis and progression of Parkinson’s disease. Pharmacol Ther. 2007;114(3):327–344. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2007.04.001. doi:S0163-7258(07)00061-7 [pii] 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2007.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Corcoran LJ, Mitchison TJ, Liu Q. A novel action of histone deacetylase inhibitors in a protein aggresome disease model. Curr Biol. 2004;14(6):488–492. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.003. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.003S0960982204001721 [pii] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Waelter S, Boeddrich A, Lurz R, Scherzinger E, Lueder G, Lehrach H, Wanker EE. Accumulation of mutant huntingtin fragments in aggresome-like inclusion bodies as a result of insufficient protein degradation. Mol Biol Cell. 2001;12(5):1393–1407. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.5.1393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Stack JH, Whitney M, Rodems SM, Pollok BA. A ubiquitin-based tagging system for controlled modulation of protein stability. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18(12):1298–1302. doi: 10.1038/82422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bence NF, Sampat RM, Kopito RR. Impairment of the ubiquitin-proteasome system by protein aggregation. Science. 2001;292(5521):1552–1555. doi: 10.1126/science.292.5521.1552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Li X, Zhao X, Fang Y, Jiang X, Duong T, Fan C, Huang CC, Kain SR. Generation of destabilized green fluorescent protein as a transcription reporter. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1998;273(52):34970–34975. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.52.34970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Corish P, Tyler-Smith C. Attenuation of green fluorescent protein half-life in mammalian cells. Protein Eng. 1999;12(12):1035–1040. doi: 10.1093/protein/12.12.1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Shamoto-Nagai M, Maruyama W, Kato Y, Isobe K, Tanaka M, Naoi M, Osawa T. An inhibitor of mitochondrial complex I, rotenone, inactivates proteasome by oxidative modification and induces aggregation of oxidized proteins in SH-SY5Y cells. J Neurosci Res. 2003;74(4):589–597. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yamamuro A, Yoshioka Y, Ogita K, Maeda S. Involvement of endoplasmic reticulum stress on the cell death induced by 6-hydroxydopamine in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. Neurochem Res. 2006;31(5):657–664. doi: 10.1007/s11064-006-9062-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Endo R, Saito T, Asada A, Kawahara H, Ohshima T, Hisanaga S. Commitment of 1-methyl-4-phenylpyrinidinium ion-induced neuronal cell death by proteasome-mediated degradation of p35 cyclin-dependent kinase 5 activator. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(38):26029–26039. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.026443. doi:M109.026443 [pii] 10.1074/jbc.M109.026443 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sawada H, Kohno R, Kihara T, Izumi Y, Sakka N, Ibi M, Nakanishi M, Nakamizo T, Yamakawa K, Shibasaki H, Yamamoto N, Akaike A, Inden M, Kitamura Y, Taniguchi T, Shimohama S. Proteasome mediates dopaminergic neuronal degeneration, and its inhibition causes alpha-synuclein inclusions. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(11):10710–10719. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308434200. doi:10.1074/jbc.M308434200 [doi] M308434200 [pii] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Prasad K, Winnik B, Thiruchelvam MJ, Buckley B, Mirochnitchenko O, Richfield EK. Prolonged toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics of paraquat in mouse brain. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115(10):1448–1453. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Seufert W, Jentsch S. Ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes UBC4 and UBC5 mediate selective degradation of short-lived and abnormal proteins. EMBO J. 1990;9(2):543–550. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08141.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Oh C, Park S, Lee EK, Yoo YJ. Downregulation of ubiquitin level via knockdown of polyubiquitin gene Ubb as potential cancer therapeutic intervention. Scientific reports. 2013;3:2623. doi: 10.1038/srep02623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Hanna J, Leggett DS, Finley D. Ubiquitin depletion as a key mediator of toxicity by translational inhibitors. Molecular and cellular biology. 2003;23(24):9251–9261. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.24.9251-9261.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Shringarpure R, Grune T, Mehlhase J, Davies KJ. Ubiquitin conjugation is not required for the degradation of oxidized proteins by proteasome. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(1):311–318. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206279200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kastle M, Reeg S, Rogowska-Wrzesinska A, Grune T. Chaperones, but not oxidized proteins, are ubiquitinated after oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;53(7):1468–1477. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.05.039. doi:S0891-5849(12)00296-1 [pii] 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.05.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Long J, Garner TP, Pandya MJ, Craven CJ, Chen P, Shaw B, Williamson MP, Layfield R, Searle MS. Dimerisation of the UBA domain of p62 inhibits ubiquitin binding and regulates NF-kappaB signalling. J Mol Biol. 2010;396(1):178–194. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.11.032. doi:S0022-2836(09)01409-0 [pii] 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.11.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Yang Y, Kitagaki J, Dai RM, Tsai YC, Lorick KL, Ludwig RL, Pierre SA, Jensen JP, Davydov IV, Oberoi P, Li CC, Kenten JH, Beutler JA, Vousden KH, Weissman AM. Inhibitors of ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1), a new class of potential cancer therapeutics. Cancer Res. 2007;67(19):9472–9481. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0568. doi:67/19/9472 [pii] 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Klionsky DJ, Abdalla FC, Abeliovich H, Abraham RT, Acevedo-Arozena A, Adeli K, Agholme L, Agnello M, Agostinis P, Aguirre-Ghiso JA, Ahn HJ, Ait-Mohamed O, Ait-Si-Ali S, Akematsu T, Akira S, Al-Younes HM, Al-Zeer MA, Albert ML, Albin RL, Alegre-Abarrategui J, Aleo MF, Alirezaei M, Almasan A, Almonte-Becerril M, Amano A, Amaravadi R, Amarnath S, Amer AO, Andrieu-Abadie N, Anantharam V, Ann DK, Anoopkumar-Dukie S, Aoki H, Apostolova N, Arancia G, Aris JP, Asanuma K, Asare NY, Ashida H, Askanas V, Askew DS, Auberger P, Baba M, Backues SK, Baehrecke EH, Bahr BA, Bai XY, Bailly Y, Baiocchi R, Baldini G, Balduini W, Ballabio A, Bamber BA, Bampton ET, Banhegyi G, Bartholomew CR, Bassham DC, Bast RC, Jr, Batoko H, Bay BH, Beau I, Bechet DM, Begley TJ, Behl C, Behrends C, Bekri S, Bellaire B, Bendall LJ, Benetti L, Berliocchi L, Bernardi H, Bernassola F, Besteiro S, Bhatia-Kissova I, Bi X, Biard-Piechaczyk M, Blum JS, Boise LH, Bonaldo P, Boone DL, Bornhauser BC, Bortoluci KR, Bossis I, Bost F, Bourquin JP, Boya P, Boyer-Guittaut M, Bozhkov PV, Brady NR, Brancolini C, Brech A, Brenman JE, Brennand A, Bresnick EH, Brest P, Bridges D, Bristol ML, Brookes PS, Brown EJ, Brumell JH, Brunetti-Pierri N, Brunk UT, Bulman DE, Bultman SJ, Bultynck G, Burbulla LF, Bursch W, Butchar JP, Buzgariu W, Bydlowski SP, Cadwell K, Cahova M, Cai D, Cai J, Cai Q, Calabretta B, Calvo-Garrido J, Camougrand N, Campanella M, Campos-Salinas J, Candi E, Cao L, Caplan AB, Carding SR, Cardoso SM, Carew JS, Carlin CR, Carmignac V, Carneiro LA, Carra S, Caruso RA, Casari G, Casas C, Castino R, Cebollero E, Cecconi F, Celli J, Chaachouay H, Chae HJ, Chai CY, Chan DC, Chan EY, Chang RC, Che CM, Chen CC, Chen GC, Chen GQ, Chen M, Chen Q, Chen SS, Chen W, Chen X, Chen YG, Chen Y, Chen YJ, Chen Z, Cheng A, Cheng CH, Cheng Y, Cheong H, Cheong JH, Cherry S, Chess-Williams R, Cheung ZH, Chevet E, Chiang HL, Chiarelli R, Chiba T, Chin LS, Chiou SH, Chisari FV, Cho CH, Cho DH, Choi AM, Choi D, Choi KS, Choi ME, Chouaib S, Choubey D, Choubey V, Chu CT, Chuang TH, Chueh SH, Chun T, Chwae YJ, Chye ML, Ciarcia R, Ciriolo MR, Clague MJ, Clark RS, Clarke PG, Clarke R, Codogno P, Coller HA, Colombo MI, Comincini S, Condello M, Condorelli F, Cookson MR, Coombs GH, Coppens I, Corbalan R, Cossart P, Costelli P, Costes S, Coto-Montes A, Couve E, Coxon FP, Cregg JM, Crespo JL, Cronje MJ, Cuervo AM, Cullen JJ, Czaja MJ, D’Amelio M, Darfeuille-Michaud A, Davids LM, Davies FE, De Felici M, de Groot JF, de Haan CA, De Martino L, De Milito A, De Tata V, Debnath J, Degterev A, Dehay B, Delbridge LM, Demarchi F, Deng YZ, Dengjel J, Dent P, Denton D, Deretic V, Desai SD, Devenish RJ, Di Gioacchino M, Di Paolo G, Di Pietro C, Diaz-Araya G, Diaz-Laviada I, Diaz-Meco MT, Diaz-Nido J, Dikic I, Dinesh-Kumar SP, Ding WX, Distelhorst CW, Diwan A, Djavaheri-Mergny M, Dokudovskaya S, Dong Z, Dorsey FC, Dosenko V, Dowling JJ, Doxsey S, Dreux M, Drew ME, Duan Q, Duchosal MA, Duff K, Dugail I, Durbeej M, Duszenko M, Edelstein CL, Edinger AL, Egea G, Eichinger L, Eissa NT, Ekmekcioglu S, El-Deiry WS, Elazar Z, Elgendy M, Ellerby LM, Eng KE, Engelbrecht AM, Engelender S, Erenpreisa J, Escalante R, Esclatine A, Eskelinen EL, Espert L, Espina V, Fan H, Fan J, Fan QW, Fan Z, Fang S, Fang Y, Fanto M, Fanzani A, Farkas T, Farre JC, Faure M, Fechheimer M, Feng CG, Feng J, Feng Q, Feng Y, Fesus L, Feuer R, Figueiredo-Pereira ME, Fimia GM, Fingar DC, Finkbeiner S, Finkel T, Finley KD, Fiorito F, Fisher EA, Fisher PB, Flajolet M, Florez-McClure ML, Florio S, Fon EA, Fornai F, Fortunato F, Fotedar R, Fowler DH, Fox HS, Franco R, Frankel LB, Fransen M, Fuentes JM, Fueyo J, Fujii J, Fujisaki K, Fujita E, Fukuda M, Furukawa RH, Gaestel M, Gailly P, Gajewska M, Galliot B, Galy V, Ganesh S, Ganetzky B, Ganley IG, Gao FB, Gao GF, Gao J, Garcia L, Garcia-Manero G, Garcia-Marcos M, Garmyn M, Gartel AL, Gatti E, Gautel M, Gawriluk TR, Gegg ME, Geng J, Germain M, Gestwicki JE, Gewirtz DA, Ghavami S, Ghosh P, Giammarioli AM, Giatromanolaki AN, Gibson SB, Gilkerson RW, Ginger ML, Ginsberg HN, Golab J, Goligorsky MS, Golstein P, Gomez-Manzano C, Goncu E, Gongora C, Gonzalez CD, Gonzalez R, Gonzalez-Estevez C, Gonzalez-Polo RA, Gonzalez-Rey E, Gorbunov NV, Gorski S, Goruppi S, Gottlieb RA, Gozuacik D, Granato GE, Grant GD, Green KN, Gregorc A, Gros F, Grose C, Grunt TW, Gual P, Guan JL, Guan KL, Guichard SM, Gukovskaya AS, Gukovsky I, Gunst J, Gustafsson AB, Halayko AJ, Hale AN, Halonen SK, Hamasaki M, Han F, Han T, Hancock MK, Hansen M, Harada H, Harada M, Hardt SE, Harper JW, Harris AL, Harris J, Harris SD, Hashimoto M, Haspel JA, Hayashi S, Hazelhurst LA, He C, He YW, Hebert MJ, Heidenreich KA, Helfrich MH, Helgason GV, Henske EP, Herman B, Herman PK, Hetz C, Hilfiker S, Hill JA, Hocking LJ, Hofman P, Hofmann TG, Hohfeld J, Holyoake TL, Hong MH, Hood DA, Hotamisligil GS, Houwerzijl EJ, Hoyer-Hansen M, Hu B, Hu CA, Hu HM, Hua Y, Huang C, Huang J, Huang S, Huang WP, Huber TB, Huh WK, Hung TH, Hupp TR, Hur GM, Hurley JB, Hussain SN, Hussey PJ, Hwang JJ, Hwang S, Ichihara A, Ilkhanizadeh S, Inoki K, Into T, Iovane V, Iovanna JL, Ip NY, Isaka Y, Ishida H, Isidoro C, Isobe K, Iwasaki A, Izquierdo M, Izumi Y, Jaakkola PM, Jaattela M, Jackson GR, Jackson WT, Janji B, Jendrach M, Jeon JH, Jeung EB, Jiang H, Jiang JX, Jiang M, Jiang Q, Jiang X, Jimenez A, Jin M, Jin S, Joe CO, Johansen T, Johnson DE, Johnson GV, Jones NL, Joseph B, Joseph SK, Joubert AM, Juhasz G, Juillerat-Jeanneret L, Jung CH, Jung YK, Kaarniranta K, Kaasik A, Kabuta T, Kadowaki M, Kagedal K, Kamada Y, Kaminskyy VO, Kampinga HH, Kanamori H, Kang C, Kang KB, Kang KI, Kang R, Kang YA, Kanki T, Kanneganti TD, Kanno H, Kanthasamy AG, Kanthasamy A, Karantza V, Kaushal GP, Kaushik S, Kawazoe Y, Ke PY, Kehrl JH, Kelekar A, Kerkhoff C, Kessel DH, Khalil H, Kiel JA, Kiger AA, Kihara A, Kim DR, Kim DH, Kim EK, Kim HR, Kim JS, Kim JH, Kim JC, Kim JK, Kim PK, Kim SW, Kim YS, Kim Y, Kimchi A, Kimmelman AC, King JS, Kinsella TJ, Kirkin V, Kirshenbaum LA, Kitamoto K, Kitazato K, Klein L, Klimecki WT, Klucken J, Knecht E, Ko BC, Koch JC, Koga H, Koh JY, Koh YH, Koike M, Komatsu M, Kominami E, Kong HJ, Kong WJ, Korolchuk VI, Kotake Y, Koukourakis MI, Kouri Flores JB, Kovacs AL, Kraft C, Krainc D, Kramer H, Kretz-Remy C, Krichevsky AM, Kroemer G, Kruger R, Krut O, Ktistakis NT, Kuan CY, Kucharczyk R, Kumar A, Kumar R, Kumar S, Kundu M, Kung HJ, Kurz T, Kwon HJ, La Spada AR, Lafont F, Lamark T, Landry J, Lane JD, Lapaquette P, Laporte JF, Laszlo L, Lavandero S, Lavoie JN, Layfield R, Lazo PA, Le W, Le Cam L, Ledbetter DJ, Lee AJ, Lee BW, Lee GM, Lee J, Lee JH, Lee M, Lee MS, Lee SH, Leeuwenburgh C, Legembre P, Legouis R, Lehmann M, Lei HY, Lei QY, Leib DA, Leiro J, Lemasters JJ, Lemoine A, Lesniak MS, Lev D, Levenson VV, Levine B, Levy E, Li F, Li JL, Li L, Li S, Li W, Li XJ, Li YB, Li YP, Liang C, Liang Q, Liao YF, Liberski PP, Lieberman A, Lim HJ, Lim KL, Lim K, Lin CF, Lin FC, Lin J, Lin JD, Lin K, Lin WW, Lin WC, Lin YL, Linden R, Lingor P, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Lisanti MP, Liton PB, Liu B, Liu CF, Liu K, Liu L, Liu QA, Liu W, Liu YC, Liu Y, Lockshin RA, Lok CN, Lonial S, Loos B, Lopez-Berestein G, Lopez-Otin C, Lossi L, Lotze MT, Low P, Lu B, Lu Z, Luciano F, Lukacs NW, Lund AH, Lynch-Day MA, Ma Y, Macian F, MacKeigan JP, Macleod KF, Madeo F, Maiuri L, Maiuri MC, Malagoli D, Malicdan MC, Malorni W, Man N, Mandelkow EM, Manon S, Manov I, Mao K, Mao X, Mao Z, Marambaud P, Marazziti D, Marcel YL, Marchbank K, Marchetti P, Marciniak SJ, Marcondes M, Mardi M, Marfe G, Marino G, Markaki M, Marten MR, Martin SJ, Martinand-Mari C, Martinet W, Martinez-Vicente M, Masini M, Matarrese P, Matsuo S, Matteoni R, Mayer A, Mazure NM, McConkey DJ, McConnell MJ, McDermott C, McDonald C, McInerney GM, McKenna SL, McLaughlin B, McLean PJ, McMaster CR, McQuibban GA, Meijer AJ, Meisler MH, Melendez A, Melia TJ, Melino G, Mena MA, Menendez JA, Menna-Barreto RF, Menon MB, Menzies FM, Mercer CA, Merighi A, Merry DE, Meschini S, Meyer CG, Meyer TF, Miao CY, Miao JY, Michels PA, Michiels C, Mijaljica D, Milojkovic A, Minucci S, Miracco C, Miranti CK, Mitroulis I, Miyazawa K, Mizushima N, Mograbi B, Mohseni S, Molero X, Mollereau B, Mollinedo F, Momoi T, Monastyrska I, Monick MM, Monteiro MJ, Moore MN, Mora R, Moreau K, Moreira PI, Moriyasu Y, Moscat J, Mostowy S, Mottram JC, Motyl T, Moussa CE, Muller S, Munger K, Munz C, Murphy LO, Murphy ME, Musaro A, Mysorekar I, Nagata E, Nagata K, Nahimana A, Nair U, Nakagawa T, Nakahira K, Nakano H, Nakatogawa H, Nanjundan M, Naqvi NI, Narendra DP, Narita M, Navarro M, Nawrocki ST, Nazarko TY, Nemchenko A, Netea MG, Neufeld TP, Ney PA, Nezis IP, Nguyen HP, Nie D, Nishino I, Nislow C, Nixon RA, Noda T, Noegel AA, Nogalska A, Noguchi S, Notterpek L, Novak I, Nozaki T, Nukina N, Nurnberger T, Nyfeler B, Obara K, Oberley TD, Oddo S, Ogawa M, Ohashi T, Okamoto K, Oleinick NL, Oliver FJ, Olsen LJ, Olsson S, Opota O, Osborne TF, Ostrander GK, Otsu K, Ou JH, Ouimet M, Overholtzer M, Ozpolat B, Paganetti P, Pagnini U, Pallet N, Palmer GE, Palumbo C, Pan T, Panaretakis T, Pandey UB, Papackova Z, Papassideri I, Paris I, Park J, Park OK, Parys JB, Parzych KR, Patschan S, Patterson C, Pattingre S, Pawelek JM, Peng J, Perlmutter DH, Perrotta I, Perry G, Pervaiz S, Peter M, Peters GJ, Petersen M, Petrovski G, Phang JM, Piacentini M, Pierre P, Pierrefite-Carle V, Pierron G, Pinkas-Kramarski R, Piras A, Piri N, Platanias LC, Poggeler S, Poirot M, Poletti A, Pous C, Pozuelo-Rubio M, Praetorius-Ibba M, Prasad A, Prescott M, Priault M, Produit-Zengaffinen N, Progulske-Fox A, Proikas-Cezanne T, Przedborski S, Przyklenk K, Puertollano R, Puyal J, Qian SB, Qin L, Qin ZH, Quaggin SE, Raben N, Rabinowich H, Rabkin SW, Rahman I, Rami A, Ramm G, Randall G, Randow F, Rao VA, Rathmell JC, Ravikumar B, Ray SK, Reed BH, Reed JC, Reggiori F, Regnier-Vigouroux A, Reichert AS, Reiners JJ, Jr., Reiter RJ, Ren J, Revuelta JL, Rhodes CJ, Ritis K, Rizzo E, Robbins J, Roberge M, Roca H, Roccheri MC, Rocchi S, Rodemann HP, Rodriguez de Cordoba S, Rohrer B, Roninson IB, Rosen K, Rost-Roszkowska MM, Rouis M, Rouschop KM, Rovetta F, Rubin BP, Rubinsztein DC, Ruckdeschel K, Rucker EB, 3rd, Rudich A, Rudolf E, Ruiz-Opazo N, Russo R, Rusten TE, Ryan KM, Ryter SW, Sabatini DM, Sadoshima J, Saha T, Saitoh T, Sakagami H, Sakai Y, Salekdeh GH, Salomoni P, Salvaterra PM, Salvesen G, Salvioli R, Sanchez AM, Sanchez-Alcazar JA, Sanchez-Prieto R, Sandri M, Sankar U, Sansanwal P, Santambrogio L, Saran S, Sarkar S, Sarwal M, Sasakawa C, Sasnauskiene A, Sass M, Sato K, Sato M, Schapira AH, Scharl M, Schatzl HM, Scheper W, Schiaffino S, Schneider C, Schneider ME, Schneider-Stock R, Schoenlein PV, Schorderet DF, Schuller C, Schwartz GK, Scorrano L, Sealy L, Seglen PO, Segura-Aguilar J, Seiliez I, Seleverstov O, Sell C, Seo JB, Separovic D, Setaluri V, Setoguchi T, Settembre C, Shacka JJ, Shanmugam M, Shapiro IM, Shaulian E, Shaw RJ, Shelhamer JH, Shen HM, Shen WC, Sheng ZH, Shi Y, Shibuya K, Shidoji Y, Shieh JJ, Shih CM, Shimada Y, Shimizu S, Shintani T, Shirihai OS, Shore GC, Sibirny AA, Sidhu SB, Sikorska B, Silva-Zacarin EC, Simmons A, Simon AK, Simon HU, Simone C, Simonsen A, Sinclair DA, Singh R, Sinha D, Sinicrope FA, Sirko A, Siu PM, Sivridis E, Skop V, Skulachev VP, Slack RS, Smaili SS, Smith DR, Soengas MS, Soldati T, Song X, Sood AK, Soong TW, Sotgia F, Spector SA, Spies CD, Springer W, Srinivasula SM, Stefanis L, Steffan JS, Stendel R, Stenmark H, Stephanou A, Stern ST, Sternberg C, Stork B, Stralfors P, Subauste CS, Sui X, Sulzer D, Sun J, Sun SY, Sun ZJ, Sung JJ, Suzuki K, Suzuki T, Swanson MS, Swanton C, Sweeney ST, Sy LK, Szabadkai G, Tabas I, Taegtmeyer H, Tafani M, Takacs-Vellai K, Takano Y, Takegawa K, Takemura G, Takeshita F, Talbot NJ, Tan KS, Tanaka K, Tang D, Tanida I, Tannous BA, Tavernarakis N, Taylor GS, Taylor GA, Taylor JP, Terada LS, Terman A, Tettamanti G, Thevissen K, Thompson CB, Thorburn A, Thumm M, Tian F, Tian Y, Tocchini-Valentini G, Tolkovsky AM, Tomino Y, Tonges L, Tooze SA, Tournier C, Tower J, Towns R, Trajkovic V, Travassos LH, Tsai TF, Tschan MP, Tsubata T, Tsung A, Turk B, Turner LS, Tyagi SC, Uchiyama Y, Ueno T, Umekawa M, Umemiya-Shirafuji R, Unni VK, Vaccaro MI, Valente EM, Van den Berghe G, van der Klei IJ, van Doorn W, van Dyk LF, van Egmond M, van Grunsven LA, Vandenabeele P, Vandenberghe WP, Vanhorebeek I, Vaquero EC, Velasco G, Vellai T, Vicencio JM, Vierstra RD, Vila M, Vindis C, Viola G, Viscomi MT, Voitsekhovskaja OV, von Haefen C, Votruba M, Wada K, Wade-Martins R, Walker CL, Walsh CM, Walter J, Wan XB, Wang A, Wang C, Wang D, Wang F, Wang G, Wang H, Wang HG, Wang HD, Wang J, Wang K, Wang M, Wang RC, Wang X, Wang YJ, Wang Y, Wang Z, Wang ZC, Wansink DG, Ward DM, Watada H, Waters SL, Webster P, Wei L, Weihl CC, Weiss WA, Welford SM, Wen LP, Whitehouse CA, Whitton JL, Whitworth AJ, Wileman T, Wiley JW, Wilkinson S, Willbold D, Williams RL, Williamson PR, Wouters BG, Wu C, Wu DC, Wu WK, Wyttenbach A, Xavier RJ, Xi Z, Xia P, Xiao G, Xie Z, Xu DZ, Xu J, Xu L, Xu X, Yamamoto A, Yamashina S, Yamashita M, Yan X, Yanagida M, Yang DS, Yang E, Yang JM, Yang SY, Yang W, Yang WY, Yang Z, Yao MC, Yao TP, Yeganeh B, Yen WL, Yin JJ, Yin XM, Yoo OJ, Yoon G, Yoon SY, Yorimitsu T, Yoshikawa Y, Yoshimori T, Yoshimoto K, You HJ, Youle RJ, Younes A, Yu L, Yu SW, Yu WH, Yuan ZM, Yue Z, Yun CH, Yuzaki M, Zabirnyk O, Silva-Zacarin E, Zacks D, Zacksenhaus E, Zaffaroni N, Zakeri Z, Zeh HJ, 3rd, Zeitlin SO, Zhang H, Zhang HL, Zhang J, Zhang JP, Zhang L, Zhang MY, Zhang XD, Zhao M, Zhao YF, Zhao Y, Zhao ZJ, Zheng X, Zhivotovsky B, Zhong Q, Zhou CZ, Zhu C, Zhu WG, Zhu XF, Zhu X, Zhu Y, Zoladek T, Zong WX, Zorzano A, Zschocke J, Zuckerbraun B. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy. Autophagy. 2012;8(4):445–544. doi: 10.4161/auto.19496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Bang Y, Kang BY, Choi HJ. Preconditioning stimulus of proteasome inhibitor enhances aggresome formation and autophagy in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells. Neurosci Lett. 2014;566:263–268. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.02.056. doi:S0304-3940(14)00160-8 [pii] 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.02.056 [doi] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Lan D, Wang W, Zhuang J, Zhao Z. Proteasome inhibitor-induced autophagy in PC12 cells overexpressing A53T mutant alpha-synuclein. Mol Med Rep. 2015;11(3):1655–1660. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2014.3011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Lim J, Lee Y, Jung S, Youdim MB, Oh YJ. Impaired autophagic flux is critically involved in drug-induced dopaminergic neuronal death. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014;20(Suppl 1):S162–S166. doi: 10.1016/S1353-8020(13)70039-7. doi:S1353-8020(13)70039-7 [pii] 10.1016/S1353-8020(13)70039-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Myeku N, Figueiredo-Pereira ME. Dynamics of the degradation of ubiquitinated proteins by proteasomes and autophagy: association with sequestosome 1/p62. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2011;286(25):22426–22440. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.149252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Kageyama S, Sou YS, Uemura T, Kametaka S, Saito T, Ishimura R, Kouno T, Bedford L, Mayer RJ, Lee MS, Yamamoto M, Waguri S, Tanaka K, Komatsu M. Proteasome dysfunction activates autophagy and the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(36):24944–24955. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.580357. doi:M114.580357 [pii] 10.1074/jbc.M114.580357 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Korolchuk VI, Mansilla A, Menzies FM, Rubinsztein DC. Autophagy inhibition compromises degradation of ubiquitin-proteasome pathway substrates. Mol Cell. 2009;33(4):517–527. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.01.021. doi:S1097-2765(09)00065-3 [pii] 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.01.021 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Rubinsztein DC. Autophagy induction rescues toxicity mediated by proteasome inhibition. Neuron. 2007;54(6):854–856. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.005. doi:S0896-6273(07)00414-X [pii] 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.005 [doi] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ebrahimi-Fakhari D, Cantuti-Castelvetri I, Fan Z, Rockenstein E, Masliah E, Hyman BT, McLean PJ, Unni VK. Distinct roles in vivo for the ubiquitin-proteasome system and the autophagy-lysosomal pathway in the degradation of alpha-synuclein. J Neurosci. 2011;31(41):14508–14520. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1560-11.2011. doi:31/41/14508 [pii] 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1560-11.2011 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Webb JL, Ravikumar B, Atkins J, Skepper JN, Rubinsztein DC. Alpha-Synuclein is degraded by both autophagy and the proteasome. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(27):25009–25013. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M300227200. doi:10.1074/jbc.M300227200 [doi] M300227200 [pii] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Cuervo AM, Stefanis L, Fredenburg R, Lansbury PT, Sulzer D. Impaired degradation of mutant alpha-synuclein by chaperone-mediated autophagy. Science. 2004;305(5688):1292–1295. doi: 10.1126/science.1101738. doi:10.1126/science.1101738 [doi] 305/5688/1292 [pii] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Chorfa A, Betemps D, Morignat E, Lazizzera C, Hogeveen K, Andrieu T, Baron T. Specific pesticide-dependent increases in alpha-synuclein levels in human neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) and melanoma (SK-MEL-2) cell lines. Toxicol Sci. 2013;133(2):289–297. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kft076. doi:kft076 [pii] 10.1093/toxsci/kft076 [doi] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Chorfa A, Lazizzera C, Betemps D, Morignat E, Dussurgey S, Andrieu T, Baron T. A variety of pesticides trigger in vitro alpha-synuclein accumulation, a key event in Parkinson’s disease. Arch Toxicol. 2014 [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Manning-Bog AB, McCormack AL, Li J, Uversky VN, Fink AL, Di Monte DA. The herbicide paraquat causes up-regulation and aggregation of alpha-synuclein in mice: paraquat and alpha-synuclein. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(3):1641–1644. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C100560200. doi:10.1074/jbc.C100560200 [doi] C100560200 [pii] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Mitra S, Chakrabarti N, Bhattacharyya A. Differential regional expression patterns of alpha-synuclein, TNF-alpha, and IL-1beta; and variable status of dopaminergic neurotoxicity in mouse brain after Paraquat treatment. J Neuroinflammation. 2011;8:163. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-8-163. doi:1742-2094-8-163 [pii] 10.1186/1742-2094-8-163 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Fauvet B, Mbefo MK, Fares MB, Desobry C, Michael S, Ardah MT, Tsika E, Coune P, Prudent M, Lion N, Eliezer D, Moore DJ, Schneider B, Aebischer P, El-Agnaf OM, Masliah E, Lashuel HA. alpha-Synuclein in central nervous system and from erythrocytes, mammalian cells, and Escherichia coli exists predominantly as disordered monomer. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(19):15345–15364. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.318949. doi:M111.318949 [pii] 10.1074/jbc.M111.318949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Lashuel HA, Overk CR, Oueslati A, Masliah E. The many faces of alpha-synuclein: from structure and toxicity to therapeutic target. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14(1):38–48. doi: 10.1038/nrn3406. doi:nrn3406 [pii] 10.1038/nrn3406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Weinreb PH, Zhen W, Poon AW, Conway KA, Lansbury PT., Jr NACP, a protein implicated in Alzheimer’s disease and learning, is natively unfolded. Biochemistry. 1996;35(43):13709–13715. doi: 10.1021/bi961799n. doi:10.1021/bi961799nbi961799n [pii] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Dettmer U, Newman AJ, Luth ES, Bartels T, Selkoe D. In vivo cross-linking reveals principally oligomeric forms of alpha-synuclein and beta-synuclein in neurons and non-neural cells. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(9):6371–6385. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.403311. doi:M112.403311 [pii] 10.1074/jbc.M112.403311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Bartels T, Choi JG, Selkoe DJ. alpha-Synuclein occurs physiologically as a helically folded tetramer that resists aggregation. Nature. 2011;477(7362):107–110. doi: 10.1038/nature10324. doi:nature10324 [pii] 10.1038/nature10324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Khurana V, Lindquist S. Modelling neurodegeneration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: why cook with baker’s yeast? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11(6):436–449. doi: 10.1038/nrn2809. doi:nrn2809 [pii] 10.1038/nrn2809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Trinh J, Farrer M. Advances in the genetics of Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9(8):445–454. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.132. doi:nrneurol.2013.132 [pii] 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Chung KK, Dawson VL, Dawson TM. The role of the ubiquitin-proteasomal pathway in Parkinson’s disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. Trends in neurosciences. 2001;24(11 Suppl):S7–S14. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01998-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Clague MJ, Urbe S. Ubiquitin: same molecule, different degradation pathways. Cell. 2010;143(5):682–685. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.012. doi:S0092-8674(10)01292-4 [pii] 10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.McNaught KS, Jenner P. Proteasomal function is impaired in substantia nigra in Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience letters. 2001;297(3):191–194. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(00)01701-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.McNaught KS, Belizaire R, Jenner P, Olanow CW, Isacson O. Selective loss of 20S proteasome alpha-subunits in the substantia nigra pars compacta in Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience letters. 2002;326(3):155–158. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)00296-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.McNaught KS, Belizaire R, Isacson O, Jenner P, Olanow CW. Altered proteasomal function in sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Experimental neurology. 2003;179(1):38–46. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2002.8050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Martins-Branco D, Esteves AR, Santos D, Arduino DM, Swerdlow RH, Oliveira CR, Januario C, Cardoso SM. Ubiquitin proteasome system in Parkinson’s disease: a keeper or a witness? Experimental neurology. 2012;238(2):89–99. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.08.008. doi:S0014-4886(12)00317-2 [pii] 10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Wang XF, Li S, Chou AP, Bronstein JM. Inhibitory effects of pesticides on proteasome activity: implication in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2006;23(1):198–205. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2006.02.012. doi:S0969-9961(06)00055-6 [pii] 10.1016/j.nbd.2006.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Zeng BY, Iravani MM, Lin ST, Irifune M, Kuoppamaki M, Al-Barghouthy G, Smith L, Jackson MJ, Rose S, Medhurst AD, Jenner P. MPTP treatment of common marmosets impairs proteasomal enzyme activity and decreases expression of structural and regulatory elements of the 26S proteasome. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;23(7):1766–1774. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04718.x. doi:EJN4718 [pii] 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04718.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Kadoguchi N, Umeda M, Kato H, Araki T. Proteasome inhibitor does not enhance MPTP neurotoxicity in mice. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2008;28(7):971–979. doi: 10.1007/s10571-008-9271-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Carvalho AN, Marques C, Rodrigues E, Henderson CJ, Wolf CR, Pereira P, Gama MJ. Ubiquitin-proteasome system impairment and MPTP-induced oxidative stress in the brain of C57BL/6 wild-type and GSTP knockout mice. Mol Neurobiol. 2013;47(2):662–672. doi: 10.1007/s12035-012-8368-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Xu Q, Farah M, Webster JM, Wojcikiewicz RJ. Bortezomib rapidly suppresses ubiquitin thiolesterification to ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes and inhibits ubiquitination of histones and type I inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor. Mol Cancer Ther. 2004;3(10):1263–1269. doi:3/10/1263 [pii] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Ding Q, Dimayuga E, Markesbery WR, Keller JN. Proteasome inhibition induces reversible impairments in protein synthesis. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2006;20(8):1055–1063. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-5495com. doi:20/8/1055 [pii] 10.1096/fj.05-5495com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Giordano S, Lee J, Darley-Usmar VM, Zhang J. Distinct effects of rotenone, 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium and 6-hydroxydopamine on cellular bioenergetics and cell death. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044610. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044610PONE-D-12-14722 [pii] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Yacoubian TA, Slone SR, Harrington AJ, Hamamichi S, Schieltz JM, Caldwell KA, Caldwell GA, Standaert DG. Differential neuroprotective effects of 14-3-3 proteins in models of Parkinson’s disease. Cell Death Dis. 2010;1:e2. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2009.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Song JX, Shaw PC, Wong NS, Sze CW, Yao XS, Tang CW, Tong Y, Zhang YB. Chrysotoxine, a novel bibenzyl compound selectively antagonizes MPP(+), but not rotenone, neurotoxicity in dopaminergic SH-SY5Y cells. Neurosci Lett. 2012;521(1):76–81. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.05.063. doi:S0304-3940(12)00719-7 [pii] 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.05.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Huang Y, Xu J, Liang M, Hong X, Suo H, Liu J, Yu M, Huang F. RESP18 is involved in the cytotoxicity of dopaminergic neurotoxins in MN9D cells. Neurotox Res. 2013;24(2):164–175. doi: 10.1007/s12640-013-9375-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Martins JB, Bastos Mde L, Carvalho F, Capela JP. Differential Effects of Methyl-4-Phenylpyridinium Ion, Rotenone, and Paraquat on Differentiated SH-SY5Y Cells. J Toxicol. 2013:347312. doi: 10.1155/2013/347312. 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Zhu M, Li WW, Lu CZ. Histone decacetylase inhibitors prevent mitochondrial fragmentation and elicit early neuroprotection against MPP+ CNS Neurosci Ther. 2014;20(4):308–316. doi: 10.1111/cns.12217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Zhang X, Zhou J, Fernandes AF, Sparrow JR, Pereira P, Taylor A, Shang F. The proteasome: a target of oxidative damage in cultured human retina pigment epithelial cells. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2008;49(8):3622–3630. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Jahngen-Hodge J, Obin MS, Gong X, Shang F, Nowell TR, Jr, Gong J, Abasi H, Blumberg J, Taylor A. Regulation of ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes by glutathione following oxidative stress. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1997;272(45):28218–28226. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.45.28218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Obin M, Shang F, Gong X, Handelman G, Blumberg J, Taylor A. Redox regulation of ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes: mechanistic insights using the thiol-specific oxidant diamide. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 1998;12(7):561–569. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.12.7.561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Yao D, Gu Z, Nakamura T, Shi ZQ, Ma Y, Gaston B, Palmer LA, Rockenstein EM, Zhang Z, Masliah E, Uehara T, Lipton SA. Nitrosative stress linked to sporadic Parkinson’s disease: S-nitrosylation of parkin regulates its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(29):10810–10814. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404161101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Ishii T, Sakurai T, Usami H, Uchida K. Oxidative modification of proteasome: identification of an oxidation-sensitive subunit in 26 S proteasome. Biochemistry. 2005;44(42):13893–13901. doi: 10.1021/bi051336u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Caballero M, Liton PB, Epstein DL, Gonzalez P. Proteasome inhibition by chronic oxidative stress in human trabecular meshwork cells. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2003;308(2):346–352. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(03)01385-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Okada K, Wangpoengtrakul C, Osawa T, Toyokuni S, Tanaka K, Uchida K. 4-Hydroxy-2-nonenal-mediated impairment of intracellular proteolysis during oxidative stress. Identification of proteasomes as target molecules. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1999;274(34):23787–23793. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.34.23787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Ding Q, Keller JN. Proteasome inhibition in oxidative stress neurotoxicity: implications for heat shock proteins. Journal of neurochemistry. 2001;77(4):1010–1017. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00302.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Cotto-Rios XM, Bekes M, Chapman J, Ueberheide B, Huang TT. Deubiquitinases as a signaling target of oxidative stress. Cell Rep. 2012;2(6):1475–1484. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.11.011. doi:S2211-1247(12)00392-0 [pii] 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Lee JG, Baek K, Soetandyo N, Ye Y. Reversible inactivation of deubiquitinases by reactive oxygen species in vitro and in cells. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1568. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2532. doi:ncomms2532 [pii] 10.1038/ncomms2532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Shang F, Taylor A. Ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and cellular responses to oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2011;51(1):5–16. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.03.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Shang F, Gong X, Taylor A. Activity of ubiquitin-dependent pathway in response to oxidative stress. Ubiquitin-activating enzyme is transiently up-regulated. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1997;272(37):23086–23093. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.37.23086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Monia BP, Ecker DJ, Crooke ST. New Perspectives on the Structure and Function of Ubiquitin. Nat Biotech. 1990;8(3):209–215. [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Buttgereit F, Brand MD. A hierarchy of ATP-consuming processes in mammalian cells. The Biochemical journal. 1995;312(Pt 1):163–167. doi: 10.1042/bj3120163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Notter MF, Irwin I, Langston JW, Gash DM. Neurotoxicity of MPTP and MPP+ in vitro: characterization using specific cell lines. Brain Res. 1988;456(2):254–262. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(88)90225-9. doi:0006-8993(88)90225-9 [pii] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Ling J, Soll D. Severe oxidative stress induces protein mistranslation through impairment of an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase editing site. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(9):4028–4033. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000315107. doi:1000315107 [pii] 10.1073/pnas.1000315107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Wei N, Shi Y, Truong LN, Fisch KM, Xu T, Gardiner E, Fu G, Hsu YS, Kishi S, Su AI, Wu X, Yang XL. Oxidative stress diverts tRNA synthetase to nucleus for protection against DNA damage. Mol Cell. 2014;56(2):323–332. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.006. doi:S1097-2765(14)00713-8 [pii] 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Tanaka M, Chock PB, Stadtman ER. Oxidized messenger RNA induces translation errors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(1):66–71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609737104. doi:0609737104 [pii] 10.1073/pnas.0609737104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Shan X, Tashiro H, Lin CL. The identification and characterization of oxidized RNAs in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci. 2003;23(12):4913–4921. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-12-04913.2003. doi:23/12/4913 [pii] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Shan X, Chang Y, Lin CL. Messenger RNA oxidation is an early event preceding cell death and causes reduced protein expression. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2007;21(11):2753–2764. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-8200com. doi:fj.07-8200com [pii] 10.1096/fj.07-8200com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Chang Y, Kong Q, Shan X, Tian G, Ilieva H, Cleveland DW, Rothstein JD, Borchelt DR, Wong PC, Lin CL. Messenger RNA oxidation occurs early in disease pathogenesis and promotes motor neuron degeneration in ALS. PLoS One. 2008;3(8):e2849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Simms CL, Hudson BH, Mosior JW, Rangwala AS, Zaher HS. An active role for the ribosome in determining the fate of oxidized mRNA. Cell Rep. 2014;9(4):1256–1264. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.042. doi:S2211-1247(14)00911-5 [pii] 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Ding Q, Dimayuga E, Keller JN. Oxidative stress alters neuronal RNA- and protein-synthesis: Implications for neural viability. Free Radic Res. 2007;41(8):903–910. doi: 10.1080/10715760701416996. doi:780572570 [pii] 10.1080/10715760701416996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Alam ZI, Daniel SE, Lees AJ, Marsden DC, Jenner P, Halliwell B. A generalised increase in protein carbonyls in the brain in Parkinson’s but not incidental Lewy body disease. Journal of neurochemistry. 1997;69(3):1326–1329. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.69031326.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Saito Y, Hamakubo T, Yoshida Y, Ogawa Y, Hara Y, Fujimura H, Imai Y, Iwanari H, Mochizuki Y, Shichiri M, Nishio K, Kinumi T, Noguchi N, Kodama T, Niki E. Preparation and application of monoclonal antibodies against oxidized DJ-1. Significant elevation of oxidized DJ-1 in erythrocytes of early-stage Parkinson disease patients. Neurosci Lett. 2009;465(1):1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.08.074. doi:S0304-3940(09)01182-3 [pii] 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.08.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Choi J, Sullards MC, Olzmann JA, Rees HD, Weintraub ST, Bostwick DE, Gearing M, Levey AI, Chin LS, Li L. Oxidative damage of DJ-1 is linked to sporadic Parkinson and Alzheimer diseases. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(16):10816–10824. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M509079200. doi:M509079200 [pii] 10.1074/jbc.M509079200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Fang J, Nakamura T, Cho DH, Gu Z, Lipton SA. S-nitrosylation of peroxiredoxin 2 promotes oxidative stress-induced neuronal cell death in Parkinson’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(47):18742–18747. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705904104. doi:0705904104 [pii] 10.1073/pnas.0705904104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Cho CS, Yoon HJ, Kim JY, Woo HA, Rhee SG. Circadian rhythm of hyperoxidized peroxiredoxin II is determined by hemoglobin autoxidation and the 20S proteasome in red blood cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(33):12043–12048. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1401100111. doi:1401100111 [pii] 10.1073/pnas.1401100111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Li X, Lu D, He F, Zhou H, Liu Q, Wang Y, Shao C, Gong Y. Cullin 4B protein ubiquitin ligase targets peroxiredoxin III for degradation. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(37):32344–32354. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.249003. doi:M111.249003 [pii] 10.1074/jbc.M111.249003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Miller DW, Ahmad R, Hague S, Baptista MJ, Canet-Aviles R, McLendon C, Carter DM, Zhu PP, Stadler J, Chandran J, Klinefelter GR, Blackstone C, Cookson MR. L166P mutant DJ-1, causative for recessive Parkinson’s disease, is degraded through the ubiquitin-proteasome system. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(38):36588–36595. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M304272200. doi:10.1074/jbc.M304272200M304272200 [pii] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Ravid T, Hochstrasser M. Diversity of degradation signals in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 2008;9(9):679–690. doi: 10.1038/nrm2468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Asher G, Reuven N, Shaul Y. 20S proteasomes and protein degradation “by default”. BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology. 2006;28(8):844–849. doi: 10.1002/bies.20447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Sohal RS, Mockett RJ, Orr WC. Mechanisms of aging: an appraisal of the oxidative stress hypothesis. Free Radic Biol Med. 2002;33(5):575–586. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(02)00886-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.da Cunha FM, Demasi M, Kowaltowski AJ. Aging and calorie restriction modulate yeast redox state, oxidized protein removal, and the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Free Radic Biol Med. 2011;51(3):664–670. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.05.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Shang F, Gong X, Palmer HJ, Nowell TR, Jr, Taylor A. Age-related decline in ubiquitin conjugation in response to oxidative stress in the lens. Experimental eye research. 1997;64(1):21–30. doi: 10.1006/exer.1996.0176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Yang F, Yang YP, Mao CJ, Liu L, Zheng HF, Hu LF, Liu CF. Crosstalk between the proteasome system and autophagy in the clearance of alpha-synuclein. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2013;34(5):674–680. doi: 10.1038/aps.2013.29. doi:aps201329 [pii] 10.1038/aps.2013.29 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Petroi D, Popova B, Taheri-Talesh N, Irniger S, Shahpasandzadeh H, Zweckstetter M, Outeiro TF, Braus GH. Aggregate clearance of alpha-synuclein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends more on autophagosome and vacuole function than on the proteasome. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(33):27567–27579. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.361865. doi:M112.361865 [pii] 10.1074/jbc.M112.361865 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Korolchuk VI, Menzies FM, Rubinsztein DC. Mechanisms of cross-talk between the ubiquitin-proteasome and autophagy-lysosome systems. FEBS Lett. 2010;584(7):1393–1398. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.12.047. doi:S0014-5793(09)01093-X [pii] 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.12.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Bove J, Zhou C, Jackson-Lewis V, Taylor J, Chu Y, Rideout HJ, Wu DC, Kordower JH, Petrucelli L, Przedborski S. Proteasome inhibition and Parkinson’s disease modeling. Ann Neurol. 2006;60(2):260–264. doi: 10.1002/ana.20937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Kim YM, Jang WH, Quezado MM, Oh Y, Chung KC, Junn E, Mouradian MM. Proteasome inhibition induces alpha-synuclein SUMOylation and aggregate formation. J Neurol Sci. 2011;307(1–2):157–161. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2011.04.015. doi:S0022-510X(11)00218-8 [pii] 10.1016/j.jns.2011.04.015 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Kordower JH, Kanaan NM, Chu Y, Suresh Babu R, Stansell J, 3rd, Terpstra BT, Sortwell CE, Steece-Collier K, Collier TJ. Failure of proteasome inhibitor administration to provide a model of Parkinson’s disease in rats and monkeys. Ann Neurol. 2006;60(2):264–268. doi: 10.1002/ana.20935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Manning-Bog AB, Reaney SH, Chou VP, Johnston LC, McCormack AL, Johnston J, Langston JW, Di Monte DA. Lack of nigrostriatal pathology in a rat model of proteasome inhibition. Ann Neurol. 2006;60(2):256–260. doi: 10.1002/ana.20938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Sun F, Anantharam V, Zhang D, Latchoumycandane C, Kanthasamy A, Kanthasamy AG. Proteasome inhibitor MG-132 induces dopaminergic degeneration in cell culture and animal models. Neurotoxicology. 2006;27(5):807–815. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2006.06.006. doi:S0161-813X(06)00168-9 [pii] 10.1016/j.neuro.2006.06.006 [doi] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Xie W, Li X, Li C, Zhu W, Jankovic J, Le W. Proteasome inhibition modeling nigral neuron degeneration in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurochem. 2010;115(1):188–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06914.x. doi:JNC6914 [pii] 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06914.x [doi] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Hara T, Nakamura K, Matsui M, Yamamoto A, Nakahara Y, Suzuki-Migishima R, Yokoyama M, Mishima K, Saito I, Okano H, Mizushima N. Suppression of basal autophagy in neural cells causes neurodegenerative disease in mice. Nature. 2006;441(7095):885–889. doi: 10.1038/nature04724. doi:nature04724 [pii] 10.1038/nature04724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Kuusisto E, Salminen A, Alafuzoff I. Ubiquitin-binding protein p62 is present in neuronal and glial inclusions in human tauopathies and synucleinopathies. Neuroreport. 2001;12(10):2085–2090. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200107200-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Odagiri S, Tanji K, Mori F, Kakita A, Takahashi H, Wakabayashi K. Autophagic adapter protein NBR1 is localized in Lewy bodies and glial cytoplasmic inclusions and is involved in aggregate formation in alpha-synucleinopathy. Acta neuropathologica. 2012;124(2):173–186. doi: 10.1007/s00401-012-0975-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Tanji K, Mori F, Kakita A, Takahashi H, Wakabayashi K. Alteration of autophagosomal proteins (LC3, GABARAP and GATE-16) in Lewy body disease. Neurobiology of disease. 2011;43(3):690–697. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Watanabe Y, Tatebe H, Taguchi K, Endo Y, Tokuda T, Mizuno T, Nakagawa M, Tanaka M. p62/SQSTM1-dependent autophagy of Lewy body-like alpha-synuclein inclusions. PloS one. 2012;7(12):e52868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Kuusisto E, Salminen A, Alafuzoff I. Early accumulation of p62 in neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer’s disease: possible role in tangle formation. Neuropathology and applied neurobiology. 2002;28(3):228–237. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2990.2002.00394.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Nagaoka U, Kim K, Jana NR, Doi H, Maruyama M, Mitsui K, Oyama F, Nukina N. Increased expression of p62 in expanded polyglutamine-expressing cells and its association with polyglutamine inclusions. Journal of neurochemistry. 2004;91(1):57–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02692.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Wooten MW, Geetha T, Seibenhener ML, Babu JR, Diaz-Meco MT, Moscat J. The p62 scaffold regulates nerve growth factor-induced NF-kappaB activation by influencing TRAF6 polyubiquitination. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(42):35625–35629. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C500237200. doi:C500237200 [pii] 10.1074/jbc.C500237200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Linares JF, Duran A, Yajima T, Pasparakis M, Moscat J, Diaz-Meco MT. K63 polyubiquitination and activation of mTOR by the p62-TRAF6 complex in nutrient-activated cells. Mol Cell. 2013;51(3):283–296. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.06.020. doi:S1097-2765(13)00477-2 [pii] 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.06.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Lau A, Wang XJ, Zhao F, Villeneuve NF, Wu T, Jiang T, Sun Z, White E, Zhang DD. A noncanonical mechanism of Nrf2 activation by autophagy deficiency: direct interaction between Keap1 and p62. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30(13):3275–3285. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00248-10. doi:MCB.00248-10 [pii] 10.1128/MCB.00248-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Tofaris GK, Kim HT, Hourez R, Jung JW, Kim KP, Goldberg AL. Ubiquitin ligase Nedd4 promotes alpha-synuclein degradation by the endosomal-lysosomal pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(41):17004–17009. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109356108. doi:1109356108 [pii] 10.1073/pnas.1109356108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Zucchelli S, Codrich M, Marcuzzi F, Pinto M, Vilotti S, Biagioli M, Ferrer I, Gustincich S. TRAF6 promotes atypical ubiquitination of mutant DJ-1 and alpha-synuclein and is localized to Lewy bodies in sporadic Parkinson’s disease brains. Human molecular genetics. 2010;19(19):3759–3770. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq290. doi:ddq290 [pii] 10.1093/hmg/ddq290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Mulherkar SA, Sharma J, Jana NR. The ubiquitin ligase E6-AP promotes degradation of alpha-synuclein. J Neurochem. 2009;110(6):1955–1964. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06293.x. doi:JNC6293 [pii] 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06293.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Lee FK, Wong AK, Lee YW, Wan OW, Chan HY, Chung KK. The role of ubiquitin linkages on alpha-synuclein induced-toxicity in a Drosophila model of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurochem. 2009;110(1):208–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06124.x. doi:JNC6124 [pii] 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06124.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Lee JT, Wheeler TC, Li L, Chin LS. Ubiquitination of alpha-synuclein by Siah-1 promotes alpha-synuclein aggregation and apoptotic cell death. Human molecular genetics. 2008;17(6):906–917. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm363. doi:ddm363 [pii] 10.1093/hmg/ddm363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Tofaris GK, Layfield R, Spillantini MG. alpha-synuclein metabolism and aggregation is linked to ubiquitin-independent degradation by the proteasome. FEBS Lett. 2001;509(1):22–26. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(01)03115-5. doi:S0014-5793(01)03115-5 [pii] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Meier F, Abeywardana T, Dhall A, Marotta NP, Varkey J, Langen R, Chatterjee C, Pratt MR. Semisynthetic, site-specific ubiquitin modification of alpha-synuclein reveals differential effects on aggregation. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134(12):5468–5471. doi: 10.1021/ja300094r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Haj-Yahya M, Fauvet B, Herman-Bachinsky Y, Hejjaoui M, Bavikar SN, Karthikeyan SV, Ciechanover A, Lashuel HA, Brik A. Synthetic polyubiquitinated alpha-Synuclein reveals important insights into the roles of the ubiquitin chain in regulating its pathophysiology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(44):17726–17731. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1315654110. doi:1315654110 [pii] 10.1073/pnas.1315654110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Liu C, Fei E, Jia N, Wang H, Tao R, Iwata A, Nukina N, Zhou J, Wang G. Assembly of lysine 63-linked ubiquitin conjugates by phosphorylated alpha-synuclein implies Lewy body biogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(19):14558–14566. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M700422200. doi:M700422200 [pii] 10.1074/jbc.M700422200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Klucken J, Poehler AM, Ebrahimi-Fakhari D, Schneider J, Nuber S, Rockenstein E, Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Hyman BT, McLean PJ, Masliah E, Winkler J. Alpha-synuclein aggregation involves a bafilomycin A 1-sensitive autophagy pathway. Autophagy. 2012;8(5):754–766. doi: 10.4161/auto.19371. doi:19371 [pii] 10.4161/auto.19371 [doi] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Sampathu DM, Giasson BI, Pawlyk AC, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM. Ubiquitination of alpha-synuclein is not required for formation of pathological inclusions in alpha-synucleinopathies. Am J Pathol. 2003;163(1):91–100. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63633-4. doi:S0002-9440(10)63633-4 [pii] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Dixon C, Mathias N, Zweig RM, Davis DA, Gross DS. Alpha-synuclein targets the plasma membrane via the secretory pathway and induces toxicity in yeast. Genetics. 2005;170(1):47–59. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.035493. doi:genetics.104.035493 [pii] 10.1534/genetics.104.035493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Goel P, Manning JA, Kumar S. NEDD4-2 (NEDD4L): the ubiquitin ligase for multiple membrane proteins. Gene. 2015;557(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2014.11.051. doi:S0378-1119(14)01328-6 [pii] 10.1016/j.gene.2014.11.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES