Skip to main content
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 1996 Apr;75(4):396–402. doi: 10.1136/hrt.75.4.396

Prognosis of supravalve aortic stenosis in 81 patients in Liverpool (1960-1993).

D Kitchiner 1, M Jackson 1, K Walsh 1, I Peart 1, R Arnold 1
PMCID: PMC484318  PMID: 8705769

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognosis of supravalve aortic stenosis into early adult life and the factors affecting this prognosis. DESIGN: 81 patients with supravalve aortic stenosis were followed for a median duration of 8.3 (range 1 to 29) years. PATIENTS: 40 patients (49.4%) had Williams' syndrome, 18 (22.2%) familial supravalve aortic stenosis, 18 (22.2%) sporadic supravalve aortic stenosis, and five (6.2%) other syndromes. Nineteen patients had additional levels of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. RESULTS: 47 patients (58%) underwent operation; 20% within a year of presentation. Multivariable analysis predicted that 88% of patients would undergo intervention within 30 years of follow up. The chance of intervention was increased by more severe aortic stenosis at presentation and the presence of multilevel obstruction in patients with sporadic supravalve aortic stenosis. Three deaths occurred before operation and 13 within a month of operation. Ten (62.5%) of the postoperative deaths were in patients with multilevel obstruction. Predicted survival 30 years after presentation was 66%. Risk factors for survival were age and severity of aortic stenosis at presentation. Multilevel obstruction did not emerge as a significant risk factor for death because of the high association with the severity of stenosis at presentation. 74% of survivors had mild or insignificant stenosis at follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival is related to age and the severity of aortic stenosis at presentation. Most patients will require intervention, and most survivors will have mild stenosis.

Full text

PDF
396

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bernhard W. F., Keane J. F., Fellows K. E., Litwin S. B., Gross R. E. Progress and problems in the surgical management of congenital aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1973 Sep;66(3):404–419. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fisher R. D., Mason D. T., Morrow A. G. Results of operative treatment in congenital aortic stenosis. Pre- and postoperative hemodynamic evaluations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1970 Feb;59(2):218–224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Flaker G., Teske D., Kilman J., Hosier D., Wooley C. Supravalvular aortic stenosis. A 20-year clinical perspective and experience with patch aortoplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1983 Jan 15;51(2):256–260. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(83)80045-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Johnson L. W., Fishman R. A., Schneider B., Parker F. B., Jr, Husson G., Webb W. R. Familial supravalvular aortic stenosis. Report of a large family and review of the literature. Chest. 1976 Oct;70(4):494–500. doi: 10.1378/chest.70.4.494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jones K. L., Smith D. W. The Williams elfin facies syndrome. A new perspective. J Pediatr. 1975 May;86(5):718–723. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(75)80356-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Keane J. F., Fellows K. E., LaFarge C. G., Nadas A. S., Bernhard W. F. The surgical management of discrete and diffuse supravalvar aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1976 Jul;54(1):112–117. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.54.1.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kitchiner D. J., Jackson M., Walsh K., Peart I., Arnold R. Incidence and prognosis of congenital aortic valve stenosis in Liverpool (1960-1990). Br Heart J. 1993 Jan;69(1):71–79. doi: 10.1136/hrt.69.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kitchiner D., Jackson M., Malaiya N., Walsh K., Peart I., Arnold R. Incidence and prognosis of obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract in Liverpool (1960-91): a study of 313 patients. Br Heart J. 1994 Jun;71(6):588–595. doi: 10.1136/hrt.71.6.588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Martin E. C., Moseley I. F. Supravalvar aortic stenosis. Br Heart J. 1973 Jul;35(7):758–765. doi: 10.1136/hrt.35.7.758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Peterson T. A., Todd D. B., Edwards J. E. Supravalvular aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1965 Nov;50(5):734–741. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rastelli G. C., McGoon D. C., Ongley P. A., Mankin H. T., Kirklin J. W. Surgical treatment of supravalvular aortic stenosis. Report of 16 cases and review of literature. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1966 Jun;51(6):873–882. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. SHONE J. D., SELLERS R. D., ANDERSON R. C., ADAMS P., Jr, LILLEHEI C. W., EDWARDS J. E. The developmental complex of "parachute mitral valve," supravalvular ring of left atrium, subaortic stenosis, and coarctation of aorta. Am J Cardiol. 1963 Jun;11:714–725. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(63)90098-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sharma B. K., Fujiwara H., Hallman G. L., Ott D. A., Reul G. J., Cooley D. A. Supravalvar aortic stenosis: a 29-year review of surgical experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991 Jun;51(6):1031–1039. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(91)91045-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Varghese P. J., Izukawa T., Rowe R. D. Supravalvular aortic stenosis as part of rubella syndrome, with discussion of pathogenesis. Br Heart J. 1969 Jan;31(1):59–62. doi: 10.1136/hrt.31.1.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Walker S. H., Duncan D. B. Estimation of the probability of an event as a function of several independent variables. Biometrika. 1967 Jun;54(1):167–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wren C., Oslizlok P., Bull C. Natural history of supravalvular aortic stenosis and pulmonary artery stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Jun;15(7):1625–1630. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)92837-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zalzstein E., Moes C. A., Musewe N. N., Freedom R. M. Spectrum of cardiovascular anomalies in Williams-Beuren syndrome. Pediatr Cardiol. 1991 Oct;12(4):219–223. doi: 10.1007/BF02310569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES