Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Apr;64(4):880–881. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14043

Development and Validation of a Brief Interactive Educational Video to Improve Outpatient Treatment of Older Adults’ Acute Musculoskeletal Pain

Timothy F Platts-Mills 1, Benjamin R Quigley 2, Joseph P Duronio 3, Meredith V Hoover 4, Eric T Burgh 5, Michael A LaMantia 6, Sonia M Davis 7, Mark A Weaver 8, Sheryl Zimmerman 9
PMCID: PMC4843832  NIHMSID: NIHMS745922  PMID: 27100584

To the editor

Acute musculoskeletal pain is a common reason for emergency department (ED) visits, and pain that is not properly treated can become chronic.1 Most ED patients with musculoskeletal pain are discharged home,2 leaving the patient responsible for decisions regarding pain management. Since commonly-used pain medications have considerable risks and frequently cause side effects for older adults,3 patient education prior to discharge is important. A brief video has the potential to provide this education in a consistent, accessible manner without requiring time from medical providers.4 To meet this need, we developed and tested a brief educational video that presents information about the pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic management of acute musculoskeletal pain.

Content for the video was based on a review of literature and current guidelines, as well as input from experts in emergency medicine, geriatrics, pharmacology, physical therapy, and risk communication.57 The initial script was modified following feedback from 10 ED patients aged 50 years and older. The video is narrated by a professional actress wearing a laboratory coat, and includes graphics and key points displayed in writing; the reading level for the spoken content is 8.6 based on the Flesch-Kincaid readability test.

The video contains four sections: acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, and non-pharmacologic behaviors. For each pharmacologic treatment, information includes common examples, indications, contraindications, recommended doses, and side effects. The non-pharmacological behaviors include physical activity, sleep, social support, and relaxation. Each section concludes with one multiple-choice question to promote viewer interaction and reinforce learning. The final version, named the “Brief Educational Tool to Enhance Recovery from Pain” (BETTER from Pain), can be accessed at the following link: https://media.med.unc.edu/emergmed/better/index.html.

Impact of the video on patient knowledge and preparedness and confidence to treat pain was evaluated in a pilot study of 40 patients aged 50 years and older who presented to an ED in the southeastern US with a chief complaint of musculoskeletal pain. Patients were excluded if they were unable to read and understand English, were critically ill as defined by a triage score of 1 on the emergency severity index or the judgment of the treating physician, or had cognitive impairment as defined by a Six-Item Screener score less than four.8,9 Before and after viewing the video, we assessed patient knowledge about pain medications using 14 multiple choice questions, as well as preparedness and confidence to treat pain at home using 6 questions with responses on a 5-point Likert scale (Online Appendix). Eight of the knowledge questions were adapted from a patient knowledge assessment for patients with osteoarthritis.10 The local Institutional Review Board approved all study procedures and verbal informed consent was obtained from all participants.

The percentage of correct answers were calculated for all knowledge questions and for knowledge question subgroups (general treatment, acetaminophen, NSAIDs, opioids); average preparedness and confidence scores were calculated by treating the 5-point Likert scales as numeric values. Before and after scores were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Scores were also assessed separately for younger (50–64 years) and older (≥65 years) patients. A sample size of 20 patients per age-group provided 80% power to detect a mean increase of 2 points in knowledge scores, assuming a standard deviation of 3 points for change in score, using a two-sided alpha of 0.05. We subsequently chose to present results as percent correct.

Of 53 ED patients screened, 44 were eligible and 40 (91%) consented to participate. Average time spent viewing the video was 13 minutes (range 8–18 minutes). Overall, 98% demonstrated improved knowledge after watching the video: average percentage of questions answered correctly increased from 37% to 65% out of 14 (p<.001). By age, pre- and post-video mean percentage of questions answered correctly were 43% and 74% for patients aged 50–64 years, and 30% and 54% for those 65 and older. One area of difficulty, even after watching the video, was categorizing NSAIDs (Motrin, 45% correct; Aleve and naproxen, 48% correct). Significant improvement was also observed for all 6 measures of preparedness and confidence, with averages scores increasing by about 0.5 points (Table). Improvements in preparedness and confidence post-video were similar for younger and older adults. All patients recommended the use of this video for others, and 93% reported the video to be useful or very useful.

Table.

Average scores before and after viewing the video for knowledge, preparedness, and confidence (N=40).

Question Type Pre-Video Post-Video p-valuea
Percent correct, mean (SD)
All (14 questions) 37 (27) 65 (24) <.001
General (1 question) 25 (44) 45 (50) .01
Acetaminophen (3 questions) 46 (34) 84 (25) <.001
NSAIDs (7 questions) 34 (32) 56 (29) <.001
Opioids (3 questions) 41 (42) 73 (33) <.001

Preparedness, mean (SD)b
Selecting pain treatment 4.1 (0.9) 4.6 (0.7) <.001
Timing of pain treatment 4.2 (1.0) 4.6 (0.8) .004
Knowing side effects 3.9 (1.2) 4.4 (0.9) .01

Confidence, mean (SD)b
Treating pain 4.2 (0.9) 4.4 (0.8) .03
Recognizing side effects 4.2 (1.0) 4.5 (0.8) .002
Expected pain relief 3.5 (0.8) 3.9 (0.8) .009
a

Calculated using Wilcoxon signed-rank test

b

Likert scale from 1 to 5 where 1 indicates “not at all” and 5 indicates “very well” (preparedness) or “extremely” (confidence).

In a sample of ED patients who viewed the BETTER from Pain video, we observed improvements in short-term knowledge, preparedness, and confidence in the self-treatment of pain. More research is needed to determine the impact of the video on behaviors, pain symptoms, side effects, and adverse events.

Supplementary Material

Supp Appendix

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the following individuals for contributing to the development of the video: Dr. Adit Ginde, Dr. Laura Hanson, Dr. Barret Bowling, Dr. Gelareh Gabayan, Dr. Susan J. Blalock, and Dr. Yvonne M. Golightly.

Additionally we would like to thank Natalie Richmond, Jason Cooper, and Dorothy Brown, and the patients who contributed to the development and evaluation of the video.

This work was funded by a John A. Hartford Foundation Centers of Excellence in Geriatric Medicine Collaborative Pilot Project Award (Platts-Mills/Zimmerman) and in part by the National Institute on Aging (K23 AG 038548; Platts-Mills), the National Institute on Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (5T35 DK 007386-35; Quigley), and by The Clinical and Translational Science Award program of the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (1UL1TR001111).

Footnotes

Sponsor’s Role: The funding agencies had no role in the preparation of this manuscript, and the authors retained full autonomy in its preparation.

Conflict of Interest: The editor in chief has reviewed the conflict of interest checklist provided by the authors and has determined that the authors have no financial or any other kind of personal conflicts with this paper.

Author Contributions: Timothy Platts-Mills: study concept and design, analysis and interpretation, preparation of manuscript. Benjamin Quigley, Joseph Duronio: acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, preparation of manuscript. Meredith Hoover, Eric Burgh: video development, preparation of manuscript. Michael LaMantia, Sonia Davis: interpretation of data, preparation of manuscript. Mark Weaver: data analysis and interpretation, preparation of manuscript. Sheryl Zimmerman: study concept and design, interpretation of data, preparation of manuscript.

Contributor Information

Timothy F. Platts-Mills, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

Benjamin R. Quigley, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

Joseph P. Duronio, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

Meredith V. Hoover, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC

Eric T. Burgh, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC

Michael A. LaMantia, Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN.

Sonia M. Davis, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

Mark A. Weaver, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

Sheryl Zimmerman, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research and the School of Social Work, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

References

  • 1.Cordell WH, Keene KK, Giles BK, et al. The high prevalence of pain in emergency medical care. Am J Emerg Med. 2002;20:165–169. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2002.32643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Platts-Mills TF, Esserman DA, Brown DL, et al. Older US emergency department patients are less likely to receive pain medication than younger patients: Results from a national survey. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60:199–206. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hunold KM, Esserman DA, Isaacs CG, et al. Side effects from oral opioids in older adults during the first week of treatment for acute musculoskeletal pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2013;20:872–879. doi: 10.1111/acem.12212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Oliveira A, Gevirtz R, Hubbard D. A psycho-educational video used in the emergency department provides effective treatment for whiplash injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:1652–1657. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000224172.45828.e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.American Geriatrics Society. Clinical practice guideline: Pharmacological management of persistent pain in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57:1331–1346. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02376.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.American Geriatrics Society. Updated beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:616–631. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03923.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Abdulla A, Adams N, Bone M, et al. Guidance on the management of pain in older people. Age Ageing. 2013;42(Suppl 1):i1–57. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Baumann MR, Strout TD. Triage of geriatric patients in the emergency department: Validity and survival with the emergency severity index. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:234–240. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Callahan CM, Unverzagt FW, Hui SL, et al. Six-item screener to identify cognitive impairment among potential subjects for clinical research. Med Care. 2002;40:771–781. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200209000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hill J, Bird H. Patient knowledge and misconceptions of osteoarthritis assessed by a validated self-completed knowledge questionnaire (PKQ-OA) Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007;46:796–800. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp Appendix

RESOURCES