Abstract
A new class of cationic gold nanoparticles has been synthesized bearing benzyl moieties featuring -NO2 and -OMe groups to investigate the regioisomeric control of aromatic nanoparticle-protein recognition. In general, nanoparticles bearing electron withdrawing group demonstrated higher binding affinities towards green fluorescent protein (GFP) compared to electron-donating groups. Significantly, a ~7.5 and ~4.3 fold increase in binding with GFP was observed for –NO2 groups in meta- and para-position respectively, while ortho-substitution showed similar binding compared to the unsubstituted ring. These findings demonstrated that nanoparticle-protein interaction can be controlled by the tuning the spatial orientation and the relative electronic properties of the aromatic substituents. This improved biomolecular recognition provides opportunities for enhanced biosensing and functional protein delivery to the cells.
Keywords: gold nanoparticles, aromatic substitution, nanoparticle-protein affinity
Introduction
Aromatic interactions, i.e. non-covalent forces involving the presence of aromatic moieties, play a critical role in the development of variety of biochemical processes including DNA duplexing (1), thermophilic protein stability (2) and biomacromolecular recognition (3). Arene interactions involved in substrate recognition by enzymes have also been of interest in de novo drug design (4) and synthetic biology (5). In particular, the modification of the electron density on the planes of the aromatic ring as well as the formation of dipoles by the introduction of a substituent, are determinant factors in aromatic interactions (6). Relevant results have also been indicated the importance of the geometry and the directionality of the aromatic groups, such as edge-face (H-π or “T-shaped” interaction), offset stacking (C-π or “parallel-dispaced” interaction) and face-to-face stacking (π-π stacking or “sandwich”) (7). Despite the fact that these interactions have been extensively studied in model systems, understanding these interactions in biological systems is challenging.
Monolayer protected nanoparticles (NPs) provide a versatile platform for biomolecular surface recognition (8) owing to their commensurate size and tunable surface functionalities for selective and/or specific interaction with the target biosystems (9). In prior studies, we have demonstrated the charge-complementary surface recognition and activity inhibition of chymotrypsin by monolayer protected gold NPs (10). Furthermore, the importance of surface hydrophobicity (11) on the stability of NP-protein complexes has also been established. However, how spatial orientation of aromatic groups on the NP surface and their relative electronic properties dictate the interactions with proteins has not been systematically explored.
Herein, we report the regioisomeric effect of the electron-withdrawing and electron-donating groups on the aromatic NP-protein interactions. To study this effect, we have synthesized seven positively charged ~2 nm core-diameter gold NPs (NP1-NP7) that feature benzyl group-terminated monolayers with nitro groups of strong electron-withdrawing character (NP2, NP3, NP4), and methoxy groups that are pi-electron-donating (NP5, NP6, NP7) (Figure 1). All of the NPs feature similar physicochemical properties (charge and size, see supporting information). A critical point in the design of these NPs is the inclusion of a non-interacting biocompatible spacer that prevents aggregation, and more importantly, allows specific chemical groups to be exposed to the NP surface (the interacting zone) (12). Based on this model, ligands having aromatic rings featuring different electron density profiles on the NP surface should provide a direct platform to examine both the electronic and regioisomeric effect on particle-protein interactions.
Figure 1.
Chemical structures of the benzyl-terminated gold nanoparticles used in protein recognition studies. The ligand design features a hydrophobic interior for particle stability, a tetra(ethylene glycol) spacer for biocompatibility and solubility, and the interacting aromatic headgroup. The electrostatic potential maps (EPM) of the different benzyl NP headgroups depict the effect of the substituent over the aromatic electron density. The side view of NP5-NP7 evidence the steric hindrance of these particles. These regioisomeric parameters affect the binding parameters, (binding constant (Ks) and the stoichiometries (n)) of each NP towards GFP. Errors represent the standard error of the mean. Computational calculations were performed using Gaussian 03 under a DFT/B3LYP level of theory and 6-311G++** basis set, and the EPMs were generated using a total density cube (coarse, SCF) and a mapped surface with an isovalue of 0.0004.
Results and discussion
Green fluorescent protein (GFP) was chosen as the target protein to probe the NP-protein complex stability profile. GFP is a beta barrel-shaped protein that features negatively charged surface at physiological pH (pI 5.92) (13). As gold NPs are positively charged, they can efficiently bind with GFP resulting in the fluorescence quenching of this protein (14). Moreover, as GFP dimer contacts consist of a core of hydrophobic/aromatic residues (15), it is expected that a change in the aromatic configuration of NPs can affect the NP-GFP interaction. To study this model system, we performed fluorescence titration studies between GFP and the different NPs in 5 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH= 7.4), monitoring the change in fluorescence intensity of GFP at 510 nm (λem= 475 nm). The resulting titration plots were analysed using nonlinear least-squares curve-fitting analysis to obtain the physicochemical parameters of the binding process, namely the binding constant (Ks) and the stoichiometries (n) (16). The concentration of GFP was kept constant at 125 nM and the fluorescence was recorded while varying the concentration of NPs from 0–400 nM (titrations performed in triplicate, see supporting information). Figure 2a depicts a typical titration plot of GFP with NP1 evidencing the quenching capabilities of these particles that allows the study of the biding affinity.
Figure 2.
a) Fluorescence titration plot for the complexation of GFP with NP1. The change in GFP emission was monitored at 510 nm (excitation= 475 nm) with increasing NP concentrations (0–250 nM, in case of NP1). b) Fold increase of the binding affinities for NP2-NP7 towards GFP, compared to NP1.
The physicochemical data of the binding process for NP1-NP7 towards GFP are shown in Figure 1. By comparing the magnitude of the binding constants, it is evident that the presence of methoxy groups (NP2, NP3, and NP4), in general, exhibits a larger binding affinity compared to the nitro moieties (NP5, NP6, and NP7). This difference in affinity can be rationalized by the fact that electron-withdrawing substituents (nitro) reduce the electron density of the aromatic ring (as observed in Figure 1), thereby presumably enhancing the interaction with negatively charged GFP. On the other hand, the methoxy groups do not affect the electron density of the aromatic ring at the same extent as nitro groups, providing lower binding affinities comparative to these groups.
Among the NPs with methoxy groups (NP5-NP7), an increase in affinity towards GFP is expected in the ortho-meta-para series, as the electronic effect generated by the quaternary nitrogen at C-1 is compensated less efficiently (less electron density over the quaternary group) (Figure 1). However, this trend is followed only by NP5 and NP7, while NP6 has the lowest affinity in this group. A computational analysis revealed that in the most stable conformation of these aromatic residues, the potentially-interacting aromatic planes are less exposed due to a steric effect provided by the methoxy group, reducing their capability of interaction. (Figure 1, side view). Such effect introduces another variable to the system, changing significantly the extent of the interactions.
In the case of the electron-withdrawing groups (NP2-NP4), steric considerations are not to blame for the differences in the ortho-meta-para series as the -NO2 aligns with the plane of the ring. However, the exposure of the -NO2 group that can participate in dipole/dipole interactions on its own, may induce additional binding ability in the meta- and para- positions, interactions that may be reduced in the ortho- position, due to the relative low exposure. Such difference elicits a significant impact on the binding affinity; conferring NP3 and NP4 the largest values of Ks compared to NP1 (~7.5 and ~4.3 fold respectively) (Figure 2b). This result mirrors the case of flavin recognition via dipole-containing aromatic systems, where electron-withdrawing fluorophenyl ring showed favourable interaction with flavin ring when fluorine atom was placed in the meta- and para- positions but interacted less favourably when the fluorine was placed in ortho-position (compared to unsubstituted phenyl) (17). Significantly, Rashkin and Waters also demonstrated that the electronegative substituent in meta-position showed largest offset π-π stacking interactions between two phenyl rings in water due to direct interaction of the substituents to the aromatic systems (18). This direct interaction of substituents can significantly alter the binding process and can favourably influence the NP-protein complexation (vide supra). Nonetheless, both the nature of the substitution and their relative position on the aromatic NP surface can lead to substantial alterations in the particle affinity towards a given protein.
Conclusions
In summary, we have synthesized a series of cationic gold NPs having electron-donating and electron-withdrawing benzyl moieties and investigated their interaction with GFP. In general, electron-withdrawing substituents showed higher binding affinities compared to electron-donating groups. Significantly, electron-withdrawing groups in the meta- and para- positions showed ~7.5 and ~4.3 fold increase in binding while ortho-substitution showed similar binding compared to the unsubstituted ring, demonstrating a regioisomeric control over aromatic NP-protein interactions. This study demonstrates that NPs can be engineered to harness improved binding affinity to a particular protein by simply changing the aromatic substitution on their functional headgroup. The significance of this work is twofold: 1) harnessing specific molecular recognition by tuning NP surface can help in develop strategies for biosensing and functional protein delivery inside the cells.; 2) higher binding affinity of NPs towards a given protein provides enhanced thermodynamic stability of NP-protein conjugate in complex matrices including cell culture media, serum, and plasma. In particular, this regioisomeric control on the stability and the formation of a ‘protein-corona’(19) on NP surface in serum is currently under investigation and will be reported in due course.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the NIH: (GM077173 and EB014277, VR) and MRSEC facilities (DMR-0820506). Zeynep Ekmekci acknowledges TUBITAK for supporting her stay at the University of Massachusetts Amherst through Program 2214. She also acknowledges her Ph.D. supervisor Prof. Dr. Metin Balci.
References
- 1.(a) Guckian KM, Schweitzer BA, Ren RXF, Sheils CJ, Paris PL, Tahmassebi DC, Kool ET. Experimental measurement of aromatic stacking affinities in the context of duplex DNA. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118:8182–8183. doi: 10.1021/ja961733f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Waters ML. Aromatic interactions in model systems. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2002;6:736–741. doi: 10.1016/s1367-5931(02)00359-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Kool ET. Hydrogen bonding, base stacking, and steric effects in DNA replication. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2001;30:1–22. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.30.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.(a) Plante JP, Burnley T, Malkova B, Webb ME, Warriner SL, Edwards TA, Wilson AJ. Oligobenzamide proteomimetic inhibitors of the p53-hDM2 protein-protein interaction. Chem Commun. 2009:5091–5093. doi: 10.1039/b908207g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kannan N, Vishveshwara S. Aromatic clusters: a determinant of thermal stability of thermophilic proteins. Protein Eng. 2000;13:753–761. doi: 10.1093/protein/13.11.753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.(a) Thomas A, Meurisse R, Charloteaux B, Brasseur R. Aromatic side-chain interactions in proteins. I. Main structural features. Proteins. 2002;48:628–634. doi: 10.1002/prot.10190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Tatko CD, Waters ML. Selective aromatic interactions in β-hairpin peptides. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:9372–9373. doi: 10.1021/ja0262481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Butterfield SM, Patel PR, Waters ML. Contribution of aromatic interactions to alpha-helix stability. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:9751–9755. doi: 10.1021/ja026668q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.(a) Ritchie TJ, Macdonald SJF, Young RJ, Pickett SD. The impact of aromatic ring count on compound developability: further insights by examining carbo- and hetero-aromatic and -aliphatic ring types. Drug Discov Today. 2011;16:164–171. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2010.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Li S, Xu Y, Shen Q, Liu X, Lu J, Chen Y, Lu T, Luo C, Luo X, Zheng M, Jiang H. Non-Covalent Interactions with Aromatic Rings: Current Understanding and Implications for Rational Drug Design. Curr Pharm Des. 2013 doi: 10.2174/13816128113199990440. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Vacas T, Corzana F, Jimenez-Oses G, Gonzalez C, Gomez AM, Bastida A, Revuelta J, Asensio JL. Role of Aromatic Rings in the Molecular Recognition of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics: Implications for Drug Design. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:12074–12090. doi: 10.1021/ja1046439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Williams TC, Nielsen LK, Vickers CE. Engineered Quorum Sensing Using Pheromone-Mediated Cell-to-Cell Communication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ACS Synth Biol. 2013;2:136–149. doi: 10.1021/sb300110b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.(a) Lee EC, Hong BH, Lee JY, Kim JC, Kim D, Kim Y, Tarakeshwar P, Kim KS. Substituent effects on the edge-to-face aromatic interactions. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:4530–4537. doi: 10.1021/ja037454r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Snyder SE, Huang BS, Chu YW, Lin HS, Carey JR. The Effects of Substituents on the Geometry of pi-pi Interactions. Chem Eur J. 2012;18:12663–12671. doi: 10.1002/chem.201202253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Wheeler SE. Understanding Substituent Effects in Noncovalent Interactions Involving Aromatic Rings. Acc Chem Res. 2013;46:1029–1038. doi: 10.1021/ar300109n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.(a) Adams H, Hunter CA, Lawson KR, Perkins J, Spey SE, Urch CJ, Sanderson JM. A supramolecular system for quantifying aromatic stacking interactions. Chem Eur J. 2001;7:4863–4877. doi: 10.1002/1521-3765(20011119)7:22<4863::aid-chem4863>3.0.co;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Cockroft SL, Hunter CA, Lawson KR, Perkins J, Urch CJ. Electrostatic control of aromatic stacking interactions. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:8594–8595. doi: 10.1021/ja050880n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Wheeler SE, Houk KN. Origin of substituent effects in edge-to-face aryl-aryl interactions. Mol Phys. 2009;107:749–760. doi: 10.1080/00268970802537614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.(a) Sarikaya M, Tamerler C, Jen AKY, Schulten K, Baneyx F. Molecular biomimetics: nanotechnology through biology. Nat Mater. 2003;2:577–585. doi: 10.1038/nmat964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Nel AE, Madler L, Velegol D, Xia T, Hoek EMV, Somasundaran P, Klaessig F, Castranova V, Thompson M. Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat Mater. 2009;8:543–557. doi: 10.1038/nmat2442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Saha K, Bajaj A, Duncan B, Rotello VM. Beauty is Skin Deep: A Surface Monolayer Perspective on Nanoparticle Interactions with Cells and Biomacromolecules. Small. 2011;7:1903–1918. doi: 10.1002/smll.201100478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Mahmoudi M, Lynch I, Ejtehadi MR, Monopoli MP, Bombelli FB, Laurent S. Protein-Nanoparticle Interactions: Opportunities and Challenges. Chem Rev. 2011;111:5610–5637. doi: 10.1021/cr100440g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Niemeyer CM. Nanoparticles, proteins, and nucleic acids: Biotechnology meets materials science. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2001;40:4128–4158. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20011119)40:22<4128::AID-ANIE4128>3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.(a) Katz E, Willner I. Integrated nanoparticle-biomolecule hybrid systems: Synthesis, properties, and applications. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2004;43:6042–6108. doi: 10.1002/anie.200400651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Nam JM, Thaxton CS, Mirkin CA. Nanoparticle-based bio-bar codes for the ultrasensitive detection of proteins. Science. 2003;301:1884–1886. doi: 10.1126/science.1088755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Lynch I, Dawson KA. Protein-nanoparticle interactions. Nano Today. 2008;3:40–47. [Google Scholar]; (d) Baron R, Willner B, Willner I. Biomolecule-nanoparticle hybrids as functional units for nanobiotechnology. Chem Commun. 2007:323–332. doi: 10.1039/b610721b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.(a) Fischer NO, McIntosh CM, Simard JM, Rotello VM. Inhibition of chymotrypsin through surface binding using nanoparticle-based receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:5018–5023. doi: 10.1073/pnas.082644099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Fischer NO, Verma A, Goodman CM, Simard JM, Rotello VM. Reversible “irreversible” inhibition of chymotrypsin using nanoparticle receptors. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:13387–13391. doi: 10.1021/ja0352505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Hong R, Fischer NO, Verma A, Goodman CM, Emrick T, Rotello VM. Control of protein structure and function through surface recognition by tailored nanoparticle scaffolds. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:739–743. doi: 10.1021/ja037470o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.(a) De M, You CC, Srivastava S, Rotello VM. Biomimetic interactions of proteins with functionalized nanoparticles: A thermodynamic study. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:10747–10753. doi: 10.1021/ja071642q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) You CC, De M, Rotello VM. Contrasting effects of exterior and interior hydrophobic moieties in the complexation of amino acid functionalized gold clusters with α-chymotrypsin. Org Lett. 2005;7:5685–5688. doi: 10.1021/ol052367k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Moyano DF, Rotello VM. Nano Meets Biology: Structure and Function at the Nanoparticle Interface. Langmuir. 2011;27:10376–10385. doi: 10.1021/la2004535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.(a) Tsien RY. The green fluorescent protein. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:509–544. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zimmer M. Green fluorescent protein (GFP): Applications, structure, and related photophysical behavior. Chem Rev. 2002;102:759–781. doi: 10.1021/cr010142r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.(a) De M, Rana S, Akpinar H, Miranda OR, Arvizo RR, Bunz UHF, Rotello VM. Sensing of proteins in human serum using conjugates of nanoparticles and green fluorescent protein. Nat Chem. 2009;1:461–465. doi: 10.1038/nchem.334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Bajaj A, Rana S, Miranda OR, Yawe JC, Jerry DJ, Bunz UHF, Rotello VM. Cell surface-based differentiation of cell types and cancer states using a gold nanoparticle-GFP based sensing array. Chem Sci. 2010;1:134–138. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yang F, Moss LG, Phillips GN. The molecular structure of green fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol. 1996;14:1246–1251. doi: 10.1038/nbt1096-1246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.You CC, De M, Han G, Rotello VM. Tunable inhibition and denaturation of alpha-chymotrypsin with amino acid-functionalized gold nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:12873–12881. doi: 10.1021/ja0512881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Goodman AJ, Breinlinger EC, McIntosh CM, Grimaldi LN, Rotello VM. Model systems for flavoenzyme activity. Control of flavin recognition via specific electrostatic interactions. Org Lett. 2001;3:1531–1534. doi: 10.1021/ol015838l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rashkin MJ, Waters ML. Unexpected substituent effects in offset pi-pi stacked interactions in water. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:1860–1861. doi: 10.1021/ja016508z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Walkey CD, Chan WCW. Understanding and controlling the interaction of nanomaterials with proteins in a physiological environment. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:2780–2799. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15233e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


