Full text
PDFPage 105
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ellis S. G., Vandormael M. G., Cowley M. J., DiSciascio G., Deligonul U., Topol E. J., Bulle T. M. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group. Circulation. 1990 Oct;82(4):1193–1202. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.82.4.1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Aug;12(2):529–545. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hausleiter J., Nolte C. W., Jost S., Wiese B., Sturm M., Lichtlen P. R. Comparison of different quantitative coronary analysis systems: ARTREK, CAAS, and CMS. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996 Jan;37(1):14–23. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199601)37:1<14::AID-CCD5>3.0.CO;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katritsis D., Lythall D. A., Anderson M. H., Cooper I. C., Webb-Peploe M. W. Assessment of coronary angioplasty by an automated digital angiographic method. Am Heart J. 1988 Nov;116(5 Pt 1):1181–1187. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(88)90437-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katritsis D., Lythall D. A., Cooper I. C., Crowther A., Webb-Peploe M. M. Assessment of coronary angioplasty: comparison of visual assessment, hand-held caliper measurement and automated digital quantitation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1988;15(4):237–242. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810150406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katritsis D., Webb-Peploe M. M. Angiographic quantitation of the results of coronary angioplasty: where do we stand? Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1990 Oct;21(2):65–71. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810210202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]