Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Apr 26;6:24946. doi: 10.1038/srep24946

MEMS Based Broadband Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Energy Harvester (PUEH) for Enabling Self-Powered Implantable Biomedical Devices

Qiongfeng Shi 1,2,*, Tao Wang 1,2,*, Chengkuo Lee 1,2,a
PMCID: PMC4844957  PMID: 27112530

Abstract

Acoustic energy transfer is a promising energy harvesting technology candidate for implantable biomedical devices. However, it does not show competitive strength for enabling self-powered implantable biomedical devices due to two issues – large size of bulk piezoelectric ultrasound transducers and output power fluctuation with transferred distance due to standing wave. Here we report a microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) based broadband piezoelectric ultrasonic energy harvester (PUEH) to enable self-powered implantable biomedical devices. The PUEH is a microfabricated lead zirconate titanate (PZT) diaphragm array and has wide operation bandwidth. By adjusting frequency of the input ultrasound wave within the operation bandwidth, standing wave effect can be minimized for any given distances. For example, at 1 cm distance, power density can be increased from 0.59 μW/cm2 to 3.75 μW/cm2 at input ultrasound intensity of 1 mW/cm2 when frequency changes from 250 to 240 kHz. Due to the difference of human body and manual surgical process, distance fluctuation for implantable biomedical devices is unavoidable and it strongly affects the coupling efficiency. This issue can be overcome by performing frequency adjustment of the PUEH. The proposed PUEH shows great potential to be integrated on an implanted biomedical device chip as power source for various applications.

Implantable biomedical devices are widely used to improve the life quality of millions of patients in various scenarios, such as pacemakers, cardiac defibrillators, neural stimulators, blood pressure monitors, etc1,2. Nowadays conventional implantable biomedical devices require power supply from batteries inside body. New emerging devices may require small power supply, such as devices for activities like cardiac sensing, adaptive pacing and programmability only demand operation power of 0.3 μW3,4. But a commercialized pacemaker still requires sizable operation power from a few microwatts to 20 μW. Even though size and capacity of batteries have been greatly improved in the past few years, lifetime of them still remains limited. Furthermore, volume of a battery typically takes up 2/3 volume of the whole pacemaker. Depleted batteries need to be replaced by surgical procedures which increase hospitalization time and expose the patients to health risks such as high morbidity or even mortality. Different energy harvesting technologies are developed in order to extend the lifetime of batteries or even to replace the batteries. There are two major approaches reported to harvest energy aiming at potential applications of implantable biomedical devices. The first method is harvesting energy from periodical vibration of heart or lung by implantable triboelectric devices5,6,7,8,9 or piezoelectric devices such as ZnO devices10,11,12,13, lead zirconate titanate (PZT) devices14,15,16,17,18. Triboelectric energy harvesters are based on the contact electrification phenomenon of two different materials, which results in triboelectric charges and current flowing in external circuit as they are put in contact with each other and separated19,20,21. Piezoelectric energy harvesters are based on the generation of internal electrical charges and potential in a piezoelectric material when subjected mechanical force, known as the piezoelectric effect. A variety of piezoelectric energy harvesters are developed, working in either d31 mode (direction of applied stress and generated voltage is perpendicular)22,23 or d33 mode (direction of applied stress and generated voltage is the same)24. Z. L. Wang et al. reports a ZnO nanowire array based nanogenerator for the first time to harvest mechanical energy10, but the output of the device is quite limited for practical application due to the low piezoelectric constant of the ZnO nanowires. A flexible PZT ribbon energy harvester on polyimide substrate is reported by C. Dagdeviren et al. to harvest energy from motions of animal hearts, lungs and diaphragms14, because PZT has 20 times higher piezoelectric coefficient than ZnO. Recently Q. Zheng et al. has reported a breathing-driven implanted triboelectric energy harvester to in vivo power a pacemaker5. But performance of triboelectric energy harvesters is greatly affected by the implanted environment and decreases significantly when in vivo data are compared to in vitro results. These implantable energy harvesters using vibration associated with activities of internal organs face a common limitation that output power is highly dependent on organ size, shape and usage condition14. Energy harvesting from small animals like rabbit or rat will not generate sound output power. Therefore, the adaptability and stability of reported implantable energy harvesters need to be improved a lot in order to make these novel power sources become practical in various implantable biomedical usage scenarios.

The second energy harvesting approach is to convey energy from external source outside body through propagating wave like inductive power transfer (IPT)25,26,27 and acoustic energy transfer (AET)28,29,30,31. Obviously harvesting energy from outside source provides adaptable and stable output power irrelevant of animal size, implanted location, organ shape, or organ vibration. Conventional energy transfer techniques to transmit energy to an implantable energy harvester include IPT32,33 and AET34,35. In the IPT or AET system, an energy source (transmitter) is used to transfer energy and an energy receiver (energy harvester) is used to collect the arrived energy. IPT is highly investigated and developed by researchers due to simple device configuration and good performance, e.g. recent reported IPT systems are able to transfer energy with high efficiency up to 90%36,37. However, drawbacks of IPT are also significant, for example, significantly decreased efficiency as distance increases, adverse side effects on human tissue, interference with integrated electrical circuits, the electromagnetic wave used in IPT can not pass through conductive media such as the metal housing of a pacemaker. These issues have greatly limited the practical applications of IPT38,39. AET is an emerging technology which receives increasing attention due to its advantages over IPT34,35,39. AET can transfer energy over a relative long distance even when a conductive medium is present40. There is no adverse side effect to human tissue which makes it ideally suitable for implantable applications. M. G. L. Rose et al. reports an AET system that is able to transfer energy over a distance as long as 10 cm41. Another AET system with high output performance is reported by S. Ozeri et al. based on a 15 mm diameter disc shape PZT element42. An ultrasonically powered implantable micro-oxygen generator (IMOG) proposed by T. Maleki et al. is demonstrated for in situ tumor oxygenation28. P. J. Larson et al. reports a cylindrical bulk PZT element integrated with diode, capacitor and neural electrode for implantable nerve cuff stimulation29. Implantable energy harvesters aim at providing energy to self-powered implantable systems. Hence miniaturized size of implantable energy harvester facilitating integration with a biomedical device is always preferable. But conventional AET energy harvesters use bulk PZT transducers with size from millimeters to centimeters30,31,41,42,43,44,45. The large size of bulk PZT transducers greatly limits the integration capability and increases the total size of the final integration system. Even though piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducer (pMUT) has been reported as sensors and actuators46,47,48, there is no reported AET data of pMUT. Furthermore, ultrasonic wave propagating between two transducers is reflected back and forth by the transducer surface, leading to standing wave between the ultrasound transmitter and receiver. For each transfer frequency, power and efficiency fluctuate significantly with peaks and valleys when increasing the distance between the transmitter and receiver. In practical usage of implanted biomedical devices, implanted depth from skin surface varies upon body size of patients and could not be accurately controlled in the surgical operation process. Thus the transferred power may falls into a minimum at a given distance due to the standing wave effect, resulting in very low efficiency. Frequency adjustment technology is developed in this study to overcome this issue. When the ultrasound frequency is changed, ultrasound wavelength changes accordingly and thus the position of peaks and valleys in the standing wave also varies. Therefore, by adjusting the transfer frequency, a maximum power point can be achieved for any given distances. To realize the frequency adjustment function, it requires a broadband energy harvester. Otherwise, changing the frequency itself will cause power reduced dramatically if an energy harvester of narrow operation bandwidth is used. Unfortunately, conventional bulk PZT transducers normally have limited bandwidth due to large impedance mismatch between the transducers and medium. Therefore, changing operation frequency of bulk PZT transducers will significantly decrease transferred power and efficiency.

In this paper, we propose a new microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) based broadband piezoelectric ultrasonic energy harvester (PUEH) aiming at extending the battery lifetime of a pacemaker or other implantable biomedical devices. Figure 1(a) shows the concept of the proposed PUEH driving a pacemaker inside of human body. The PUEH is fabricated from miniaturized PZT diaphragm array, making it ideally suitable to be integrated with an implantable pacemaker without significantly increasing the device volume. The PUEH can harvest ultrasonic energy from an external ultrasound head that is commonly used in hospitals for diagnostic application, while it is impossible for IPT passing through the metal housing of pacemaker. Due to the optimized design of the thin PZT diaphragm, two resonant modes are overlapped, providing an extra wide operation bandwidth. Standing wave induced frequency loss can be overcome by adjusting ultrasound frequency for any given implanted distances. For example, at 1 cm distance in water, the output power density can be increased from 0.59 μW/cm2 to 3.75 μW/cm2 at ultrasound intensity of 1 mW/cm2 by changing the frequency from 250 kHz to 240 kHz. Distance fluctuation during energy transfer process caused by breathing or muscle movement also can be overcome by this frequency adjustment. When the distance slightly deviates (i.e. from 1 cm to 1.1 cm) at 370 kHz, the output power density largely drops from 4.10 μW/cm2 to 0.18 μW/cm2. Such power and efficiency loss can be retrieved as 4.06 μW/cm2 by adjusting the ultrasound frequency to 340 kHz. The proposed MEMS based broadband PUEH shows great potential as a power source used in various implantable biomedical devices for diversified applications.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Schematic of the proposed PUEH integrated with a pacemaker and powered by an ultrasound head. (b) Schematic illustration of the proposed PUEH. (c) Cross-sectional view of the proposed PUEH. (d) Photograph of the PUEH on a human finger.

Results

Design

The overall device structure of the PUEH is shown in Fig. 1(b). The PUEH consists of 7 PZT diaphragms that are connected in parallel to increase the output current and power. PZT diaphragm array is fabricated on a silicon on insulator (SOI) wafer. Dimension of each PZT diaphragm is 500 μm × 250 μm with multilayered structure containing Si, SiO2, bottom Pt electrode, PZT, and top Pt electrode as shown in Fig. 1(c). The PZT diaphragm with optimized length to width ratio and thickness provides broadband property without compromising device performance and robustness. A dicing chip with size of 5 mm × 5 mm held by a human finger is shown in Fig. 1(d). The spacing between two PZT diaphragms is 90 μm. Effective area of the PUEH is 2.058 mm2, indicated by the red dash rectangle in Fig. 1(d). Benefited from the micro fabrication of the miniaturized PZT diaphragms, array structure on one single chip to improve output performance is simple to achieve, as well as the integration with other functioning electrical sensors, stimulators, etc. Fig. 2(a) illustrates, from left to right, the optical microscope image of the PZT diaphragms, photograph of PUEH packaged on dual in-line package (DIP) and a commercialized bulk PZT transducer (M165D25, Pro-wave corp.) which is used as a transmitter in the AET system. Figure 2(b) shows the scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of PZT diaphragm patterns and cross-sectional view of multilayered structure of the diaphragm.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Optical microscope image of the PZT diaphragm array (left), photograph of the PUEH on a DIP packaging with wirebonding (middle) and photograph of a bulk PZT transducer used as a transmitter in AET system (right). (b) Bird view and cross-sectional view SEM images of the PUEH.

Characterization

In order to find out the resonant frequency of the PUEH, it is first immersed into a water tank and connected to a signal generator. Then a burst-mode sinusoidal signal is applied to excite the PUEH to generate ultrasound in water medium. Next, a hydrophone (2118, Precision Acoustic Ltd) is utilized to record the generated ultrasound pressure at 3 cm distance. The burst-mode sinusoidal signal is used to eliminate the reflection signal between PUEH and hydrophone. Frequency of the sinusoidal signal is changed from 100 kHz to 1 MHz to obtain the frequency response of the PUEH, shown in Fig. 3. A finite element analysis (FEA) model is built by using COMSOL Multiphysics to simulate the resonant frequency of the PUEH. The testing result matches quite well with the simulation, as illustrated in Fig. 3. The relatively thin diaphragm enables a better acoustic impedance match with the medium, and therefore a larger frequency bandwidth. Moreover, because of the optimized diaphragm length to width ratio, the 1st and 3rd resonant mode are overlapped, resulting in an extra-wide operation bandwidth of the PUEH. The PUEH has -6 dB bandwidth of 73.7% with central frequency of 285 kHz for 1st resonant mode and -6 dB bandwidth of 30.8% with central frequency of 650 kHz for 3rd resonant mode. For -10 dB frequency response, it covers two resonant modes within a frequency range from 170 kHz to 820 kHz (650 kHz), showing the excellent broadband property of the PUEH. Frequency can be adjusted in this range without losing the energy harvesting capability and efficiency.

Figure 3. Frequency response of the PUEH from simulation and testing results.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

When an AET system is operated in a certain medium, ultrasonic waves reflect back and forth between the surfaces of transmitter and receiver. The standing wave is formed as the reflected waves of different orders interfere with the original ultrasonic wave. Figure 4 shows a typical standing wave effect when one PUEH is used as transmitter and another PUEH is used as receiver in water medium. The reason why the bulk PZT transducer is not used as transmitter here is because the distance variation here is within the near field region of the bulk PZT, but the near field region for PUEH is within 100 μm (supplementary information, Figure S1). Hence in order to eliminate the interference of near field, two PUEHs are used to form an AET system to measure the standing wave. Sinusoidal with 10 Vpp amplitude and 200 kHz frequency is applied to the transmitter. Distance between the transmitter and receiver is increased from 1 cm to 4 cm. It can be observed from Fig. 5 that when the distance increases, maxima voltage points and minima voltage points occur alternatively. The maxima voltage points occur at the distance given by following equations:

Figure 4. Measured standing wave effect between two PUEHs.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(a) Schematic of tunable distance for a maxima point. (b) Tunable distance range for first 7 maxima points.

graphic file with name srep24946-m1.jpg
graphic file with name srep24946-m2.jpg

where Inline graphic is the distance between the transmitter and receiver, Inline graphic is the positive integer (1, 2, 3, …), Inline graphic is the wavelength in medium, Inline graphic is the speed of sound in medium (1480 m/s in water) and Inline graphic is frequency. When the distance is a multiple of half wavelength of the ultrasonic wave, the reflected ultrasonic wave is in phase with the original ultrasonic wave, thus the voltage at that distance is enhanced. Minima voltage points occur at a distance in the middle of two maxima voltage points. Since the frequency used here is 200 kHz, ultrasound wavelength is 7.4 mm in water based on equation (2). Therefore, when the distance is a multiple of 3.7 mm, there is a maxima voltage point. It is worth noting that the values of maxima voltage points decrease exponentially when increasing distance, due to the diffraction of the ultrasonic wave from transmitter.

Benefited from the broadband property of the PUEH, frequency can be changed within the wide operation bandwidth without losing the transduction efficiency. When frequency changes, locations of maxima voltage points also change accordingly based on equation (1) and (2). Thus when frequency is changed within the operation bandwidth range, locations of maxima voltage points also change within a tunable distance range. Bandwidth of the PUEH is from 170 kHz (Inline graphic) to 820 kHz ( f2), then location of Inline graphic maxima voltage point covers distance range from Inline graphic to Inline graphic with respect to the transmitter. The tunable distance range for Inline graphic maxima voltage point is indicated in Fig. 5. Figure 5(a) shows the schematic of the maxima voltage point changing with varying the frequency. Figure 5(b) shows the tunable distance range for the first 7 maxima voltage points. The details of tunable distance range are also listed in Table 1. If a given distance between the transmitter and receiver is within the tunable distance range of Inline graphic maxima voltage point, the Inline graphic maxima voltage point can always be located to that given distance by adjusting frequency within the operation bandwidth of PUEH. For example, if the distance between the transmitter and receiver is 5 mm, from Table 1 we can see that it falls in the tunable distance range of the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th maxima voltage point. When performing the frequency adjustment at 5 mm, there are 4 maxima voltage points that can be achieved for 4 different frequencies within the operation bandwidth.

Table 1. Tunable distance range of different maxima points.

Maxima points 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th …
Distance range (mm) 0.90 – 4.36 1.80 – 8.71 2.70 – 13.07 3.60 – 17.42 4.50 – 21.78 5.40 – 26.13 6.30 – 30.49 7.20 – 34.84 …
Open in a new tab

Energy harvesting evaluation

In a practical implantation case, the implanted depth of a biomedical device is normally different due to the difference of human body and manual surgical process. There is a high chance that the distance (implanted depth) may fall at the location of a minima point, resulting in poor output and low transduction efficiency. This problem has not been fully addressed, and the researchers usually only demonstrate the highest efficiency at a precise distance. This is actually not available for practical applications. Therefore, we try to overcome this problem by performing frequency adjustment with the broadband PUEH. To demonstrate the energy harvesting capability of the broadband PUEH for a given distance, an alternative AET system is built by a bulk PZT transmitter and a PUEH receiver in a water tank as depicted in Fig. 6(a). Photograph of testing setup is shown in supplementary information, Figure S2. The bulk PZT and PUEH are both covered by grounded Al foil with a window open for ultrasound propagation to eliminate the electromagnetic coupling between devices. Both the bulk PZT and the PUEH are immersed under DI water and the distance is fixed to 1 cm. The impedances of the PUEH and bulk PZT measured in water with respect to frequency are shown in supplementary, Figure S3. The PUEH is connected to a 50Ω resistor load, while the bulk PZT is excited by a signal generator with 10 Vpp sinusoidal signals. The output voltage on the resistor load is measured by an oscilloscope.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

(a) Schematic drawing of testing setup for voltage and power measurement. (b) Voltage and power when ultrasound intensity of 1 mW/cm2 is applied.

For different frequency (from 100 kHz to 1 MHz), the generated ultrasound pressure and thus ultrasound intensity from the bulk PZT transmitter are different. In order to eliminate the effect of bulk PZT transmitter and provide a fair comparison between different frequency for PUEH, output voltage and power are normalized to the magnitude when ultrasound intensity of 1 mW/cm2 is applied. Ultrasound pressure can be measured by a hydrophone placed at 1 cm distance from the bulk PZT, and then ultrasound intensity can be calculated by the following equation:

graphic file with name srep24946-m15.jpg

where Inline graphic is the ultrasound intensity, Inline graphic is the ultrasound pressure and Inline graphic is the acoustic impedance (for water medium, Inline graphic is 1.48 × 106 kg/m2·s). Figure S4(a,b) in supplementary information show the ultrasound pressure of the bulk PZT from COMSOL Multiphysics simulation and hydrophone measurement, respectively. It can be observed that the testing data matches with the simulation data. At 1 cm distance, ultrasound pressure from the bulk PZT varies a lot when changing the frequency.

The output voltage and power of the PUEH on 50 Ω resistor load are shown in Fig. 6(b). Both the output voltage and power are normalized to 1 mW/cm2 input ultrasound intensity. For the 1 cm transfer distance, power peaks and valleys occur alternately when frequency is increased from 100 kHz to 1 MHz. Locations of these peaks are the effect of standing wave given by equation (1), but the magnitudes are the effect of both standing wave and PUEH frequency response property. Due to standing wave effect, the magnitude of lower order maxima point is larger than higher order one as shown in Fig. 4. But, due to PUEH frequency response property, the magnitude of maxima points should follow the trend of the frequency response curve. The voltage and power curves in Fig. 6(b) are the effect of these two factors. Within the bandwidth of PUEH, standing wave effect can be minimized by adjusting the transfer frequency. For example, if we perform energy transfer at the 1st resonant frequency of the PUEH (250 kHz), normalized output power is only 12.0 nW. Then if frequency adjustment is applied, just by changing the frequency to 240 kHz, normalized output power can be increased to 77.1 nW which is more than 6 times higher. The highest normalized power and power density of the PUEH is 84.3 nW and 4.1 μW/cm2, respectively, when frequency is 370 kHz. This is because for 370 kHz, 1 cm distance is the distance that satisfies maxima point and thus power is enhanced. Furthermore the ultrasound intensity at 370 kHz is higher than the adjacent frequencies, even though power is normalized, stronger ultrasound intensity results in stronger enhancement in the standing wave effect. According to the ultrasound safety limit given by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the ultrasound intensity applied on human should be less than 720 mW/cm2. If an ultrasound intensity of 700 mW/cm2 is applied to the PUEH, it can produce power and power density of 59.01 μW and 2.9 mW/cm2, respectively. This power is sufficient to support the operation of a commercialized pacemaker. The ultrasound frequency of maxima points from theoretical calculation and testing data are compared in Table 2. The frequencies from testing data almost match with the frequencies from calculation only with small deviation due to system setup and manual operation errors. For 962 kHz, there is no maxima point that matches with this frequency. It is because the PUEH barely vibrates at 962 kHz since 962 kHz is out of its operation bandwidth.

Table 2. Ultrasound frequency of maxima points from theoretical calculation and testing data at 1 cm transfer distance.

Calculation (kHz) 148 222 296 370 444 518 592 666 740 814 888 962
Testing data (kHz) 130 240 290 370 410 540 570 650 730 780 910 \
Open in a new tab

Small distance fluctuation during energy transfer process is a common situation in practical implantation use due to breathing and muscle movement. This can also be overcome by using the proposed broadband PUEH. For example, if a transfer frequency of 370 kHz is adopted when the distance is 1 cm. But suddenly there is a small distance fluctuation of 1 mm due to muscle movement, then power can significantly decreases from 84.3 nW to 4.28 and 3.61 nW for 0.9 cm and 1.1 cm distance, respectively, as shown in Fig. 7. It can be observed that for both 0.9 cm and 1.1 cm distance, the power are both very low. This is because at 370 kHz, both 0.9 cm and 1.1 cm are the minima points of the standing wave. In this situation, frequency adjustment can also bring the power back to original high level. As illustrated in Fig. 7, by adjusting the frequency to 330 kHz, power at 0.9 cm distance can be significantly increased. By adjusting the frequency to 340 kHz, power at 1.1 cm can also be significantly improved. Therefore, high transfer power and efficiency can always be achieved by frequency adjustment of the PUEH for different distance or distance fluctuation in implantable applications.

Figure 7. Frequency adjustment to achieve high transfer power and efficiency when 1 mm distance fluctuation happens.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

In vitro test of the PUEH to transmit power through a pork tissue is shown in Fig. 8. Figure 8(a) shows the testing setup, indicating that the distance between transmitter and receiver is 2.3 cm and a 6 mm thick pork tissue is inserted in between to mimic implanted tissue. Figure 8(b) shows the normalized output power when performing frequency adjustment. When the ultrasound frequency is 370 kHz, the output power is only 16.5 nW. Then by adjusting the ultrasound frequency to 330 kHz, the output power is increased to 85.2 nW. Ultrasound intensity on the PUEH at 330 kHz without and with the presence of pork tissue is 0.067 and 0.0023 mW/cm2, respectively. The ultrasound intensity through a pork tissue decreases because of the impedance mismatch of pork tissue and water medium, ultrasound reflection at interface and ultrasound attenuation through the pork tissue. Even though the arrived ultrasound intensity is smaller, the PUEH still shows same energy harvesting capability since normalized power is of the same level. The ultrasound intensity on the PUEH can be increased by increasing the incoming ultrasound intensity from external ultrasound source, thus to increase output power of the PUEH for powering implantable biomedical devices. The proposed MEMS based broadband PUEH has the ability to harvest energy even from small ultrasound intensity and can be adopted as the power source for various implantable biomedical system applications.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

(a) Schematic and photograph of testing setup for power delivery through a 6 mm thick pork tissue. (b) Delivered power through pork tissue when ultrasound intensity of 1 mW/cm2 is applied.

Discussion

In this work, a MEMS based broadband PUEH is proposed for enabling self-powered implantable biomedical devices application. The PUEH is fabricated from PZT diaphragm array with miniaturized size and optimized length to width ratio. Frequency adjustment of the PUEH can be performed to minimize the effect of standing wave for any given distances or even distance fluctuation during energy transfer process. For example, by adjusting the frequency from 250 kHz (resonant frequency of the PUEH) to 240 kHz, output power can be increased from 0.59 μW/cm2 to 3.75 μW/cm2 at distance of 1 cm and ultrasound intensity of 1 mW/cm2. Distance fluctuation can also be overcome by adjusting new ultrasound frequency for the fluctuated distance. The proposed MEMS based broadband PUEH has great potential to be integrated into various implantable biomedical devices for diversified applications.

Methods

Fabrication of the PUEH

Fabrication of the PUEH starts from a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer with 10 μm device layer, 1 μm buried oxide layer (BOX), and 400 μm Si handle layer. Firstly, a 1 μm oxide layer is sputtered on top of the SOI wafer for insulation. After that, Pt (200 nm)/Ti (10 nm) layer are deposited as bottom electrode by DC magnetron sputtering. Then a 2 μm PZT layer is formed by sol-gel process. Another Pt (200 nm)/Ti (10 nm) layer are deposited on PZT as the top electrode. Next, top electrode is etched by Ar ions and PZT layer is etched by a mixture of HF, HNO3 and HCl. Then bottom electrode is also etched by Ar ions. Lastly, backside Si and SiO2 layer are etched by deep reactive-ion etching (DRIE) down to the Si device layer to release the suspending diaphragm structure.

Characterizations and Measurements

For taking the optical microscope images, a DFC290 optical microscope (Leica) is used. For taking the SEM images, a Nova NanoSEM 230 scanning electron microscope (FEI Company) is used. For the impedance measurements of the PUEH and bulk PZT transducer, a 4294A impedance analyzer (Agilent) is used. A 33500B signal generator (Agilent) is used to generate sinusoidal signals to bulk PZT transmitter. For voltage measurement, the output signal is connected to a DSO-X3034A oscilloscope (Agilent).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Shi, Q. et al. MEMS Based Broadband Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Energy Harvester (PUEH) for Enabling Self-Powered Implantable Biomedical Devices. Sci. Rep. 6, 24946; doi: 10.1038/srep24946 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep24946-s1.pdf (549.1KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by NRF2011 NRF-CRP001-057 Program ‘Self-powered body sensor for disease management and prevention-orientated healthcare’ (R-263-000-A27-281) from the National Research Foundation (NRF), Singapore, “Thermoelectric Power Generator (TEG) Based Self-Powered ECG Plaster – System Integration (Part 3)” (R-263-000-B56-112) from the Faculty Research Committee (FRC), National University of Singapore, Singapore, and MOE2012-T2-2-154 Program “Monolithic integrated Si/AlN nanophotonics platform for optical NEMS and OEICs” (R-263-000-A59-112) from the Academic Research Fund (ARF) - Tier 2, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Footnotes

Author Contributions Q.S., T.W. and C.L. conceptualized the idea and device design. Q.S. and T.W. tested the device and analysed the experimental data. C.L. supervised the research activities and contributed to the manuscript preparation. All the authors reviewed the manuscript.

References

  1. Mokwa W. Medical implants based on microsystems. Meas. Sci. Technol. 18, R47 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  2. Meng E. & Sheybani R. Insight: implantable medical devices. Lab Chip 14, 3233–3240 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Silveira F. & Flandre D. Low power analog CMOS for cardiac pacemakers: Design and Optimization in Bulk and SOI Technologies (Springer Science & Business Media, 2004). [Google Scholar]
  4. Ohm O. J. & Danilovic D. Improvements in pacemaker energy consumption and functional capability: four decades of progress. Pacing. Clin. Electrophysiol. 20, 2–9 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zheng Q. et al. In Vivo Powering of Pacemaker by Breathing‐Driven Implanted Triboelectric Nanogenerator. Adv. Mater. 26, 5851–5856 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hinchet R. & Kim S. W. Wearable and Implantable Mechanical Energy Harvesters for Self-Powered Biomedical Systems. ACS Nano 9, 7742–7745 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Tang W. et al. Implantable Self-Powered Low-Level Laser Cure System for Mouse Embryonic Osteoblasts’ Proliferation and Differentiation. ACS Nano 9, 7867–7873 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang X. S. et al. Frequency-multiplication high-output triboelectric nanogenerator for sustainably powering biomedical microsystems. Nano Lett. 13, 1168–1172 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang Z. L. Triboelectric nanogenerators as new energy technology for self-powered systems and as active mechanical and chemical sensors. ACS Nano 7, 9533–9557 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang Z. L. & Song J. Piezoelectric nanogenerators based on zinc oxide nanowire arrays. Science 312, 242–246 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhu G., Yang R., Wang S. & Wang Z. L. Flexible high-output nanogenerator based on lateral ZnO nanowire array. Nano Lett. 10, 3151–3155 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lee S. et al. Super-Flexible Nanogenerator for Energy Harvesting from Gentle Wind and as an Active Deformation Sensor. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 2445–2449 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee S. et al. Ultrathin Nanogenerators as Self‐Powered/Active Skin Sensors for Tracking Eye Ball Motion. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 1163–1168 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  14. Dagdeviren C. et al. Conformal piezoelectric energy harvesting and storage from motions of the heart, lung, and diaphragm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 1927–1932 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Karami M. A. & Inman D. J. Powering pacemakers from heartbeat vibrations using linear and nonlinear energy harvesters. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 042901 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  16. Qi Y. et al. Enhanced piezoelectricity and stretchability in energy harvesting devices fabricated from buckled PZT ribbons. Nano Lett. 11, 1331–1336 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen X., Xu S., Yao N. & Shi Y. 1.6 V nanogenerator for mechanical energy harvesting using PZT nanofibers. Nano Lett. 10, 2133–2137 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Qi Y. & McAlpine M. C. Nanotechnology-enabled flexible and biocompatible energy harvesting. Energy Environ. Sci. 3, 1275–1285 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  19. Fan F. R. et al. Transparent triboelectric nanogenerators and self-powered pressure sensors based on micropatterned plastic films. Nano Lett. 12, 3109–3114 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dhakar L. et al. Large scale triboelectric nanogenerator and self-powered pressure sensor array using low cost roll-to-roll UV embossing. Sci. Rep. 6, 22253 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dhakar L., Pitchappa P., Tay F. E. H. & Lee C. An intelligent skin based self-powered finger motion sensor integrated with triboelectric nanogenerator. Nano Energy 19, 532- 540 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  22. Shen D. et al. The design, fabrication and evaluation of a MEMS PZT cantilever with an integrated Si proof mass for vibration energy harvesting. J. Micromech. and Microeng. 18, 055017 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu H., Tay C. J., Quan C., Kobayashi T. & Lee C. Piezoelectric MEMS energy harvester for low-frequency vibrations with wideband operation range and steadily increased output power. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 20, 1131–1142 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  24. Park J. C., Park J. Y. & Lee Y. P. Modeling and characterization of piezoelectric-mode MEMS energy harvester. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 19, 1215–1222 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  25. Montgomery K. L. et al. Wirelessly powered, fully internal optogenetics for brain, spinal and peripheral circuits in mice. Nat. Methods 12, 969–974 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Si P., Hu A. P., Malpas S. & Budgett D. A frequency control method for regulating wireless power to implantable devices. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 2, 22–29 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang F., Liu X., Hackworth S., Sclabassi R. J. & Sun M. In vitro and in vivo studies on wireless powering of medical sensors and implantable devices. IEEE/NIH Life Sci. Syst. and Applicat. Workshop 84-87, 10.1109/LISSA.2009.4906715 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed]
  28. Maleki T. et al. An ultrasonically powered implantable micro-oxygen generator (IMOG). IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58, 3104–3111 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Larson P. J. & Towe B. C. Miniature ultrasonically powered wireless nerve cuff stimulator. IEEE/EMBS 5th Int. Conf. Neural Eng. 265–268, 10.1109/NER.2011.5910538 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  30. Lee S. Q., Youm W., Hwang G., Moon K. S. & Ozturk Y. Resonant ultrasonic wireless power transmission for bio-implants. Proc. SPIE 9057, Active and Passive Smart Structures and Integrated Syst. 90570J–90570J, 10.1117/12.2046600 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  31. Ozeri S. & Shmilovitz D. Ultrasonic transcutaneous energy transfer for powering implanted devices. Ultrasonics 50, 556–566 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Covic G. & Boys J. T. Inductive power transfer. Proc. IEEE 101, 1276–1289 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  33. Hui S. Y. R., Zhong W. & Lee C. K. A critical review of recent progress in mid-range wireless power transfer. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 29, 4500–4511 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  34. Roes M. G., Duarte J. L., Hendrix M. A. & Lomonova E. Acoustic energy transfer: a review. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 60, 242–248 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  35. Zaid T., Saat S., Yusop Y. & Jamal N. Contactless energy transfer using acoustic approach-A review. Int. Conf. Comput., Commun., and Control Technology 376–381, 10.1109/I4CT.2014.6914209 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  36. Sample A. P., Meyer D. & Smith J. R. Analysis, experimental results, and range adaptation of magnetically coupled resonators for wireless power transfer. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 58, 544–554 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  37. Kurs A. et al. Wireless power transfer via strongly coupled magnetic resonances. Science 317, 83–86 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Waffenschmidt E. & Staring T. Limitation of inductive power transfer for consumer applications. 13th European Conf. Power Electron. and Applicat. 1–10 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  39. Denisov A. & Yeatman E. Ultrasonic vs. inductive power delivery for miniature biomedical implants. Int. Conf. Body Sensor Networks 84–89, 10.1109/BSN.2010.27 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  40. Hu Y., Zhang X., Yang J. & Jiang Q. Transmitting electric energy through a metal wall by acoustic waves using piezoelectric transducers. IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq. Control 50, 773–781 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Roes M. G. L., Hendrix M. A. M. & Duarte J. L. Contactless energy transfer through air by means of ultrasound. IECON 37th Annual Conf. IEEE Ind. Electron. Soc. 1238-1243, 10.1109/IECON.2011.6119486 (2011).
  42. Ozeri S., Shmilovitz D., Singer S. & Wang C. C. Ultrasonic transcutaneous energy transfer using a continuous wave 650kHz Gaussian shaded transmitter. Ultrasonics 50, 666–674 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kawanabe H., Katane T., Saotome H., Saito O. & Kobayashi K. Power and information transmission to implanted medical device using ultrasonic. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 40, 3865 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  44. Suzuki S. N. et al. Power and interactive information transmission to implanted medical device using ultrasonic. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 41, 3600 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  45. Arra S., Leskinen J., Heikkilä J. & Vanhala J. Ultrasonic power and data link for wireless implantable applications. ISWPC 2nd Int. Symp Wireless Pervasive Computing 10.1109/ISWPC.2007.342668 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang T., Sawada R. & Lee C. A Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer Using Piston-Like Membrane Motion. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 36, 957–959 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang T. & Lee C. Zero-Bending Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer (pMUT) With Enhanced Transmitting Performance. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 24, 2083–2091 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  48. Wang T., Kobayashi T. & Lee C. Micromachined piezoelectric ultrasonic transducer with ultra-wide frequency bandwidth. App. Phycs. Lett. 106, 013501 (2015). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep24946-s1.pdf (549.1KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES