Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 1996 Sep;76(3):264–268. doi: 10.1136/hrt.76.3.264

Prophylactic replacement of Björk-Shiley convexo-concave heart valves: an easy-to-use tool to aid decision-making in individual patients.

E W Steyerberg 1, J H van der Meulen 1, L A van Herwerden 1, J D Habbema 1
PMCID: PMC484518  PMID: 8868987

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop an easy-to-use tool for decision-making on prophylactic replacement of Björk-Shiley convexo-concave heart valves. DESIGN: Decision analysis comparing elective replacement with observation. SETTING: Referral centres for patients with artificial heart valves. PATIENTS: Quantitative estimates were obtained from a follow up study conducted in The Netherlands, including 2303 patients with a mean follow up of 6.6 years and from recently published studies. INTERVENTION: Elective valve replacement with a new artificial heart valve. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Loss of life-expectancy. RESULTS: A simple graph was constructed to present the loss of life-expectancy caused by strut fracture for combinations of basal life-expectancy (life-expectancy without strut fracture) and lethal fracture risk (strut fracture risk multiplied by lethality of fracture). This loss can be compared directly with the loss of life-expectancy caused by surgical mortality. This quantitative approach takes into account individual patient characteristics, such as age, gender, cardiac comorbidity, and position of the valve, but the final estimation of surgical mortality also requires clinical judgement. The calculations can be made easily by hand or with a simple computer application. CONCLUSIONS: This decision support tool enables the direct estimation of the gain or loss of life-expectancy that is likely with replacement of a Björk-Shiley convexo-concave heart valve. It can be used to evaluate individual patients as well as groups of patients, and allows for easy incorporation of revisions of fracture risk estimates.

Full text

PDF
264

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beck J. R., Pauker S. G. The Markov process in medical prognosis. Med Decis Making. 1983;3(4):419–458. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8300300403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Birkmeyer J. D., Marrin C. A., O'Connor G. T. Should patients with Björk-Shiley valves undergo prophylactic replacement? Lancet. 1992 Aug 29;340(8818):520–523. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91717-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ericsson A., Lindblom D., Semb G., Huysmans H. A., Thulin L. I., Scully H. E., Bennett J. G., Ostermeyer J., Grunkemeier G. L. Strut fracture with Björk-Shiley 70 degrees convexo-concave valve. An international multi-institutional follow-up study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1992;6(7):339–346. doi: 10.1016/1010-7940(92)90169-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lindblom D., Björk V. O., Semb B. K. Mechanical failure of the Björk-Shiley valve. Incidence, clinical presentation, and management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986 Nov;92(5):894–907. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lindblom D., Rodriguez L., Björk V. O. Mechanical failure of the Björk-Shiley valve. Updated follow-up and considerations on prophylactic rereplacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989 Jan;97(1):95–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McGiffin D. C., O'Brien M. F., Galbraith A. J., McLachlan G. J., Stafford E. G., Gardner M. A., Pohlner P. G., Early L., Kear L. An analysis of risk factors for death and mode-specific death after aortic valve replacement with allograft, xenograft, and mechanical valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993 Nov;106(5):895–911. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. O'Neill W. W., Chandler J. G., Gordon R. E., Bakalyar D. M., Abolfathi A. H., Castellani M. D., Hirsch J. L., Wieting D. W., Bassett J. S., Beatty K. C. Radiographic detection of strut separations in Björk-Shiley convexo-concave mitral valves. N Engl J Med. 1995 Aug 17;333(7):414–419. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199508173330703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Piehler J. M., Blackstone E. H., Bailey K. R., Sullivan M. E., Pluth J. R., Weiss N. S., Brookmeyer R. S., Chandler J. G. Reoperation on prosthetic heart values. Patient-specific estimates of in-hospital events. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995 Jan;109(1):30–48. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(95)70418-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. de Mol B. A., Kallewaard M., McLellan R. B., van Herwerden L. A., Defauw J. J., van der Graaf Y. Single-leg strut fractures in explanted Björk-Shiley valves. Lancet. 1994 Jan 1;343(8888):9–12. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90874-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. van der Graaf Y., de Waard F., van Herwerden L. A., Defauw J. Risk of strut fracture of Björk-Shiley valves. Lancet. 1992 Feb 1;339(8788):257–261. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91328-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. van der Meulen J. H., Steyerberg E. W., van der Graaf Y., van Herwerden L. A., Verbaan C. J., Defauw J. J., Habbema J. D. Age thresholds for prophylactic replacement of Björk-Shiley convexo-concave heart valves. A clinical and economic evaluation. Circulation. 1993 Jul;88(1):156–164. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.1.156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES