Full text
PDFImages in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Baumgartner H., Khan S., DeRobertis M., Czer L., Maurer G. Discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients in aortic prosthetic valves in vitro. A manifestation of localized gradients and pressure recovery. Circulation. 1990 Oct;82(4):1467–1475. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.82.4.1467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clark C. The fluid mechanics of aortic stenosis--I. Theory and steady flow experiments. J Biomech. 1976;9(8):521–528. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(76)90068-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Currie P. J., Seward J. B., Reeder G. S., Vlietstra R. E., Bresnahan D. R., Bresnahan J. F., Smith H. C., Hagler D. J., Tajik A. J. Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients. Circulation. 1985 Jun;71(6):1162–1169. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.71.6.1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fischer J. L., Haberer T., Dickson D., Henselmann L. Comparison of Doppler echocardiographic methods with heart catheterisation in assessing aortic valve area in 100 patients with aortic stenosis. Br Heart J. 1995 Mar;73(3):293–298. doi: 10.1136/hrt.73.3.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hegrenaes L., Hatle L. Aortic stenosis in adults. Non-invasive estimation of pressure differences by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J. 1985 Oct;54(4):396–404. doi: 10.1136/hrt.54.4.396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holen J., Aaslid R., Landmark K., Simonsen S. Determination of pressure gradient in mitral stenosis with a non-invasive ultrasound Doppler technique. Acta Med Scand. 1976;199(6):455–460. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1976.tb06763.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holen J., Waag R. C., Gramiak R. Doppler ultrasound in aortic stenosis: in vitro studies of pressure gradient determination. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1987 Jun;13(6):321–328. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(87)90165-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krafchek J., Robertson J. H., Radford M., Adams D., Kisslo J. A reconsideration of Doppler assessed gradients in suspected aortic stenosis. Am Heart J. 1985 Oct;110(4):765–773. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(85)90455-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levine R. A., Jimoh A., Cape E. G., McMillan S., Yoganathan A. P., Weyman A. E. Pressure recovery distal to a stenosis: potential cause of gradient "overestimation" by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 Mar 1;13(3):706–715. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90615-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tindale W. B., Trowbridge E. A. Evaluation in vitro of prosthetic heart valves: pulsatile flow through a compliant aorta. Life Support Syst. 1983 Jul-Sep;1(3):173–188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vandervoort P. M., Greenberg N. L., Powell K. A., Cosgrove D. M., Thomas J. D. Pressure recovery in bileaflet heart valve prostheses. Localized high velocities and gradients in central and side orifices with implications for Doppler-catheter gradient relation in aortic and mitral position. Circulation. 1995 Dec 15;92(12):3464–3472. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.12.3464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vasko S. D., Goldberg S. J., Requarth J. A., Allen H. D. Factors affecting accuracy of in vitro valvar pressure gradient estimates by Doppler ultrasound. Am J Cardiol. 1984 Oct 1;54(7):893–896. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(84)80228-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoganathan A. P., Cape E. G., Sung H. W., Williams F. P., Jimoh A. Review of hydrodynamic principles for the cardiologist: applications to the study of blood flow and jets by imaging techniques. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Nov;12(5):1344–1353. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)92620-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]