Skip to main content
PMC home page
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 1996 Nov;76(5):430–434. doi: 10.1136/hrt.76.5.430

An evaluation of the results of media and educational campaigns designed to shorten the time taken by patients with acute myocardial infarction to decide to go to hospital.

M B Blohm 1, M Hartford 1, B W Karlson 1, R V Luepker 1, J Herlitz 1
PMCID: PMC484576  PMID: 8944590

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the benefits and pitfalls of educational campaigns designed to reduce the delay between the onset of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and its treatment. METHODS: All seven educational campaigns reported between 1982 and 1994 were evaluated. RESULTS: The impact on delay time ranged from a reduction of patient decision time by 35% to no reduction. One study reported a sustained reduction that resulted in the delay time being halved during the three years after the campaign. The use of ambulances did not increase. Only one study reported that survival was unaffected. There was a temporary increase in the numbers of patients admitted to the emergency department with non-cardiac chest pain in the initial phase of educational campaigns. CONCLUSION: The challenge of shortening the delay between the onset of infarction and the start of treatment remains. The campaigns so far have not been proved to be worthwhile and it is not certain that further campaigns will do better. New media campaigns should be run to establish whether a different type of message is more likely to change the behaviour of people in this life-threatening situation.

Full text

PDF
430

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bahr R. D. Reducing time to therapy in AMI patients: the new paradigm. Am J Emerg Med. 1994 Jul;12(4):501–503. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(94)90075-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bett N., Aroney G., Thompson P. Impact of a national educational campaign to reduce patient delay in possible heart attack. Aust N Z J Med. 1993 Apr;23(2):157–161. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1993.tb01810.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blohm M., Hartford M., Karlson B. W., Karlsson T., Herlitz J. A media campaign aiming at reducing delay times and increasing the use of ambulance in AMI. Am J Emerg Med. 1994 May;12(3):315–318. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(94)90147-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blohm M., Herlitz J., Hartford M., Karlson B. W., Risenfors M., Luepker R. V., Sjölin M., Holmberg S. Consequences of a media campaign focusing on delay in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1992 Feb 1;69(4):411–413. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90244-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blohm M., Herlitz J., Schröder U., Hartford M., Karlson B. W., Risenfors M., Larsson E., Luepker R., Wennerblom B., Holmberg S. Reaction to a media campaign focusing on delay in acute myocardial infarction. Heart Lung. 1991 Nov;20(6):661–666. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burns J. M., Hogg K. J., Rae A. P., Hillis W. S., Dunn F. G. Impact of a policy of direct admission to a coronary care unit on use of thrombolytic treatment. Br Heart J. 1989 Apr;61(4):322–325. doi: 10.1136/hrt.61.4.322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cobb L. A., Werner J. A., Trobaugh G. B. Sudden cardiac death. I. A decade's experience with out-of-hospital resuscitation. Mod Concepts Cardiovasc Dis. 1980 Jun;49(6):31–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eppler E., Eisenberg M. S., Schaeffer S., Meischke H., Larson M. P. 911 and emergency department use for chest pain: results of a media campaign. Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Aug;24(2):202–208. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70131-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gaspoz J. M., Unger P. F., Urban P., Chevrolet J. C., Rutishauser W., Lovis C., Goldman L., Héliot C., Séchaud L., Mischler S. Impact of a public campaign on pre-hospital delay in patients reporting chest pain. Heart. 1996 Aug;76(2):150–155. doi: 10.1136/hrt.76.2.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gibbons R. J., Holmes D. R., Reeder G. S., Bailey K. R., Hopfenspirger M. R., Gersh B. J. Immediate angioplasty compared with the administration of a thrombolytic agent followed by conservative treatment for myocardial infarction. The Mayo Coronary Care Unit and Catheterization Laboratory Groups. N Engl J Med. 1993 Mar 11;328(10):685–691. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199303113281003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Grines C. L., Browne K. F., Marco J., Rothbaum D., Stone G. W., O'Keefe J., Overlie P., Donohue B., Chelliah N., Timmis G. C. A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1993 Mar 11;328(10):673–679. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199303113281001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hackett T. P., Cassem N. H. Factors contributing to delay in responding to the signs and symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1969 Nov;24(5):651–658. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(69)90452-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hartford M., Herlitz J., Karlson B. W., Risenfors M. Components of delay time in suspected acute myocardial infarction with particular emphasis on patient delay. J Intern Med. 1990 Nov;228(5):519–523. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1990.tb00272.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Herlitz J., Blohm M., Hartford M., Hjalmarsson A., Holmberg S., Karlson B. W. Delay time in suspected acute myocardial infarction and the importance of its modification. Clin Cardiol. 1989 Jul;12(7):370–374. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960120704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Herlitz J., Blohm M., Hartford M., Karlson B. W., Luepker R., Holmberg S., Risenfors M., Wennerblom B. Follow-up of a 1-year media campaign on delay times and ambulance use in suspected acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1992 Feb;13(2):171–177. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Herlitz J., Hartford M., Blohm M., Karlson B. W., Ekström L., Risenfors M., Wennerblom B., Luepker R. V., Holmberg S. Effect of a media campaign on delay times and ambulance use in suspected acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1989 Jul 1;64(1):90–93. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90659-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Herlitz J., Hartford M., Karlson B. V., Risenfors M., Blohm M., Luepker R. V., Wennerblom B., Holmberg S. Effect of a media campaign to reduce delay times for acute myocardial infarction on the burden of chest pain patients in the emergency department. Cardiology. 1991;79(2):127–134. doi: 10.1159/000174870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hjalmarson A., Elmfeldt D., Herlitz J., Holmberg S., Málek I., Nyberg G., Rydén L., Swedberg K., Vedin A., Waagstein F. Effect on mortality of metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction. A double-blind randomised trial. Lancet. 1981 Oct 17;2(8251):823–827. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)91101-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ho M. T., Eisenberg M. S., Litwin P. E., Schaeffer S. M., Damon S. K. Delay between onset of chest pain and seeking medical care: the effect of public education. Ann Emerg Med. 1989 Jul;18(7):727–731. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80004-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. MacCallum A. G., Stafford P. J., Jones C., Vincent R., Perez-Avila C., Chamberlain D. A. Reduction in hospital time to thrombolytic therapy by audit of policy guidelines. Eur Heart J. 1990 Aug;11 (Suppl F):48–52. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/11.suppl_f.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mitic W. R., Perkins J. The effect of a media campaign on heart attack delay and decision times. Can J Public Health. 1984 Nov-Dec;75(6):414–418. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Moses H. W., Bartolozzi J. J., Jr, Koester D. L., Colliver J. A., Taylor G. J., Mikell F. L., Dove J. T., Katholi R. E., Woodruff R. C., Miller B. D. Reducing delay in the emergency room in administration of thrombolytic therapy for myocardial infarction associated with ST elevation. Am J Cardiol. 1991 Jul 15;68(2):251–253. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90754-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Moses H. W., Engelking N., Taylor G. J., Prabhakar C., Vallala M., Colliver J. A., Silberman H., Schneider J. A. Effect of a two-year public education campaign on reducing response time of patients with symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1991 Jul 15;68(2):249–251. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90753-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Moss A. J., Goldstein S. The pre-hospital phase of acute myocadial infarction. Circulation. 1970 May;41(5):737–742. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.41.5.737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pell A. C., Miller H. C., Robertson C. E., Fox K. A. Effect of "fast track" admission for acute myocardial infarction on delay to thrombolysis. BMJ. 1992 Jan 11;304(6819):83–87. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6819.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rawles J. Halving of mortality at 1 year by domiciliary thrombolysis in the Grampian Region Early Anistreplase Trial (GREAT). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Jan;23(1):1–5. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90494-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Roth R., Stewart R. D., Rogers K., Cannon G. M. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: factors associated with survival. Ann Emerg Med. 1984 Apr;13(4):237–243. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(84)80470-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rowley J. M., Hill J. D., Hampton J. R., Mitchell J. R. Early reporting of myocardial infarction: impact of an experiment in patient education. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 Jun 12;284(6331):1741–1746. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6331.1741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Saetta J. P., Quinton D., Dacruz D., Barnes M. Delay in thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: the role of the accident and emergency department. Arch Emerg Med. 1990 Sep;7(3):206–211. doi: 10.1136/emj.7.3.206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schmidt S. B., Borsch M. A. The prehospital phase of acute myocardial infarction in the era of thrombolysis. Am J Cardiol. 1990 Jun 15;65(22):1411–1415. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)91345-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schofer J., Büttner J., Geng G., Gutschmidt K., Herden H. N., Mathey D. G., Moecke H. P., Polster P., Raftopoulo A., Sheehan F. H. Prehospital thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1990 Dec 15;66(20):1429–1433. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90528-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schroeder J. S., Lamb I. H., Hu M. The prehospital course of patients with chest pain. Analysis of the prodromal, symptomatic, decision-making, transportation and emergency room periods. Am J Med. 1978 May;64(5):742–748. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(78)90512-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sharkey S. W., Bruneete D. D., Ruiz E., Hession W. T., Wysham D. G., Goldenberg I. F., Hodges M. An analysis of time delays preceding thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1989 Dec 8;262(22):3171–3174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Simon A. B., Feinleib M., Thompson H. K., Jr Components of delay in the pre-hospital phase of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1972 Oct;30(5):476–482. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(72)90037-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Turi Z. G., Stone P. H., Muller J. E., Parker C., Rude R. E., Raabe D. E., Jaffe A. S., Hartwell T. D., Robertson T. L., Braunwald E. Implications for acute intervention related to time of hospital arrival in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1986 Aug 1;58(3):203–209. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90047-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Weaver W. D., Cerqueira M., Hallstrom A. P., Litwin P. E., Martin J. S., Kudenchuk P. J., Eisenberg M. Prehospital-initiated vs hospital-initiated thrombolytic therapy. The Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Trial. JAMA. 1993 Sep 8;270(10):1211–1216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Weaver W. D., Cobb L. A., Hallstrom A. P., Copass M. K., Ray R., Emery M., Fahrenbruch C. Considerations for improving survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med. 1986 Oct;15(10):1181–1186. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80862-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wennerblom B., Holmberg S., Wedel H. The effect of a mobile coronary care unit on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction or cardiac arrest outside hospital. Eur Heart J. 1982 Dec;3(6):504–515. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. White H. D., Norris R. M., Brown M. A., Takayama M., Maslowski A., Bass N. M., Ormiston J. A., Whitlock T. Effect of intravenous streptokinase on left ventricular function and early survival after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1987 Oct 1;317(14):850–855. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198710013171402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zijlstra F., de Boer M. J., Hoorntje J. C., Reiffers S., Reiber J. H., Suryapranata H. A comparison of immediate coronary angioplasty with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993 Mar 11;328(10):680–684. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199303113281002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES