Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 1996 Nov;76(5):439–441. doi: 10.1136/hrt.76.5.439

Permanent pacemaker implantation after cardiac transplantation: extra cost of a conservative policy.

N D Holt 1, G Parry 1, M M Tynan 1, J H Dark 1, J M McComb 1
PMCID: PMC484578  PMID: 8944592

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the costs of a change in permanent pacemaker implantation policy to later implantation (day 21+) after cardiac transplantation. DESIGN: Retrospective review of patient records including duration of temporary pacing, timed of permanent pacemaker implantation, and length of hospital stay for every patient surviving > or = 14 days from November 1990 to August 1995 (period 2) and for all patients in whom permanent pacemakers were implanted between May 1985 and November 1990 (period 1). SETTING: Supra-regional cardiopulmonary transplant unit. PATIENTS: 335 consecutive adult cardiac transplant recipients at Freeman Hospital between May 1985 and August 1995. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The cost of the policy change was calculated by subtraction of the overall saving in pacemaker implantations from the overall cost of the extra inpatient stay in period 2 due to delayed implantation. RESULTS: Mean inpatient stay per patient following cardiac transplantation of permanent pacemaker recipients in period 1 was 13.8 days compared with 23.9 days in period 2 (P < 0.001). The cost of this extended hospital stay is 60,095 pounds. Had the implantation policy not been changed, a further seven patients would have received a permanent pacemaker in period 2. A saving in pacemaker hardware of 16,275 pounds was made. Overall, however, the new permanent pacemaker implantation policy increased expenditure by 43,820 pounds, assuming that permanent pacemaker implantation was the only reason for the extended hospital stay. CONCLUSION: The change in policy from early to later permanent pacemaker implantation has markedly increased expenditure.

Full text

PDF
439

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. DiBiase A., Tse T. M., Schnittger I., Wexler L., Stinson E. B., Valantine H. A. Frequency and mechanism of bradycardia in cardiac transplant recipients and need for pacemakers. Am J Cardiol. 1991 Jun 15;67(16):1385–1389. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90469-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Granger J. P. Inhibitors of ANF metabolism. Potential therapeutic agents in cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 1990 Jul;82(1):313–315. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.82.1.313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Heinz G., Ohner T., Laufer G., Gasic S., Laczkovics A. Clinical and electrophysiologic correlates of sinus node dysfunction after orthotopic heart transplantation. Observations in 42 patients. Chest. 1990 Apr;97(4):890–895. doi: 10.1378/chest.97.4.890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Holt N. D., Tynan M. M., Scott C. D., Parry G., Dark J. H., McComb J. M. Permanent pacemaker use after cardiac transplantation: completing the audit cycle. Heart. 1996 Nov;76(5):435–438. doi: 10.1136/hrt.76.5.435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Loria K., Salinger M., McDonough T., Frohlich T., Arentzen C. Activitrax AAIR pacing for sinus node dysfunction after orthotopic heart transplantation: an initial report. J Heart Transplant. 1988 Sep-Oct;7(5):380–384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mounsey J. P., Ray S. G., Griffith M. J., Gold R. G., Bexton R. S. Impact of internal audit on pacemaker prescription and the immediate costs of pacing in the northern region: towards implementation of the recommendations of the British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group. Br Heart J. 1994 Apr;71(4):395–398. doi: 10.1136/hrt.71.4.395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Parry G., Malbut K., Dark J. H., Bexton R. S. Optimal pacing modes after cardiac transplantation: is synchronisation of recipient and donor atria beneficial? Br Heart J. 1992 Aug;68(2):195–198. doi: 10.1136/hrt.68.8.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ray S. G., Griffith M. J., Jamieson S., Bexton R. S., Gold R. G. Impact of the recommendations of the British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group on pacemaker prescription and on the immediate costs of pacing in the Northern Region. Br Heart J. 1992 Nov;68(5):531–534. doi: 10.1136/hrt.68.11.531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Scott C. D., Dark J. H., McComb J. M. Evolution of the chronotropic response to exercise after cardiac transplantation. Am J Cardiol. 1995 Dec 15;76(17):1292–1296. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80358-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Scott C. D., McComb J. M., Dark J. H., Bexton R. S. Permanent pacing after cardiac transplantation. Br Heart J. 1993 May;69(5):399–403. doi: 10.1136/hrt.69.5.399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Scott C. D., Omar I., McComb J. M., Dark J. H., Bexton R. S. Long-term pacing in heart transplant recipients is usually unnecessary. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Nov;14(11 Pt 2):1792–1796. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb02768.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES