Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genes logoLink to Genes
. 2016 Apr 4;7(4):13. doi: 10.3390/genes7040013

Bioinformatics Analysis of MAPKKK Family Genes in Medicago truncatula

Wei Li 1,†, Hanyun Xu 1,†, Ying Liu 1, Lili Song 1, Changhong Guo 1,*, Yongjun Shu 1,*
Editor: Paolo Cinelli1
PMCID: PMC4846843  PMID: 27049397

Abstract

Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase (MAPKKK) is a component of the MAPK cascade pathway that plays an important role in plant growth, development, and response to abiotic stress, the functions of which have been well characterized in several plant species, such as Arabidopsis, rice, and maize. In this study, we performed genome-wide and systemic bioinformatics analysis of MAPKKK family genes in Medicago truncatula. In total, there were 73 MAPKKK family members identified by search of homologs, and they were classified into three subfamilies, MEKK, ZIK, and RAF. Based on the genomic duplication function, 72 MtMAPKKK genes were located throughout all chromosomes, but they cluster in different chromosomes. Using microarray data and high-throughput sequencing-data, we assessed their expression profiles in growth and development processes; these results provided evidence for exploring their important functions in developmental regulation, especially in the nodulation process. Furthermore, we investigated their expression in abiotic stresses by RNA-seq, which confirmed their critical roles in signal transduction and regulation processes under stress. In summary, our genome-wide, systemic characterization and expressional analysis of MtMAPKKK genes will provide insights that will be useful for characterizing the molecular functions of these genes in M. truncatula.

Keywords: Medicago truncatula, MAPKKK, phylogenetic analysis, expression analysis, abiotic stresses

1. Introduction

MAP kinase signaling cascade pathways have been well identified and characterized in many plants [1]. These MAPK pathways are characterized with important roles in plant growth, development, and response to abiotic stress [2]. The MAPK pathway is minimally consisted of three members, a MAPKKK (MAPK kinase kinase), a MAPKK (MAPK kinase), and a MAPK [3,4]; they interact and transmit signals from upstream receptors to downstream function targets by phosphorylation function [5,6]. Among these MAPK families, the MAPKKK family is the largest, with more gene members than other families. They are further classified into three subfamilies, RAF, MEKK, and ZIK, based on characteristic sequence motifs [3].

In plants, the functions of MAPKKK family members are extensively studied. For instance, in Arabidopsis, three MAPKKK genes (ANP1, ANP2, and ANP3) regulate plant cell division [7], while another MAPKKK gene, YODA, regulates stomata development [8]. Meanwhile, some MAPKKK genes are reported to have a function in the signal transduction pathway’s response to various stresses [9]. For example, CTR1 and EDR1, belonging to the Arabidopsis RAF MAPKKK subfamily, negatively regulate ethylene signaling transduction and participate in pathogen resistance [10,11,12]. Similar research has shown that DSM1, a Raf-like MAPKKK gene, improves drought tolerance through ROS scavenging in rice [13]. In the tomato, SlMAPKKKɛ is reported to positively regulate cell death, functioning in plant immunity and disease resistance [14]. Recently, many plant genomes have become available; lots of MAPKKK genes have been identified by genome-wide searching methods, including Arabidopsis (80 members) [15], rice (75 members) [16], maize (74 members) [17], and soybeans (150 members) [18].

Medicago truncatula is an annual legume plant that can form a symbiotic association with soil bacteria called rhizobia. Because of its small, diploid genome, short life cycle, self-fertility, and high genetic transformation efficiency, M. truncatula has become an excellent legume model plant [19]. When its genome sequence was released, Neupane et al. investigated two MAPK families, MAPK and MAPKK, and their reports showed that MAPK signaling cascade pathways played important roles in tissue development, such as leaf, root, and nodule [20]. However, the largest family, MAPKKK, has not been identified on a genome level; their function is poorly characterized in M. truncatula.

In this study, we performed a genome-wide analysis of the MAPKKK family in M. truncatula, including phylogenetic analysis, chromosomal localization, and gene duplication analysis. Meanwhile, we also investigated their expression profiles by microarray data and an RNA-seq experiment, and explored their function in plant development and response to stresses. These findings would be valuable for understanding MAPK cascade function and promoting their utilization in legumes’ genetic improvement.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Identification of the MAPKKK Gene Family in Medicago truncatula

The Medicago truncatula genome sequences were downloaded from JCVI (http://jcvi.org/medicago/, Mt4.0) [19]. MAPKKK protein sequences of Arabidopsis were collected and used as queries to search against the M. truncatula genome using the BLASTP program with e-values of 1E–5. The blast hits were confirmed to contain protein kinase domain (PF00069) [21] using HMMER [22] tools. These proteins from the same gene locus were identified as protein duplications, and the redundancies were removed with the longest one kept. The remaining one was identified as a MAPKKK family member. All of the putative MtMAPKKK family genes were aligned to Arabidopsis MAPKKK proteins to classify them into different subfamilies as Janitza et al. described [23]. Meanwhile, all of the annotation information of these MtMAPKKK genes was retrieved from the M. truncatula genome website, and their structures were displayed using GSDS software [24].

2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis of the MtMAPKKK Genes in M. truncatula

The protein sequences of MtMAPKKK genes were aligned using ClustalW with the default parameters [25]. The results were used for phylogenetic analysis using MEGA (Version 4.0), and an unrooted phylogenetic tree was generated using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method with the following parameters: Poisson correction, pair-wise deletion, and 1,000 bootstrap replicates [26].

2.3. Chromosomal Location and Gene Duplication of MtMAPKKK Genes

Positional information about all of the MAPKKK genes was retrieved from the M. truncatula genome, and the nucleotide sequences of these genes were used as query sequences for a BLASTN search against each other to explore gene duplication, with similarities of more than 85%. In addition, duplications between the MAPKKK genes were also identified and complemented using the PGDD database (http://chibba.agtec.uga.edu/duplication/) [27]. Based on the space between duplication gene pairs, these duplications were classified into tandem duplications (TD, separated by four or fewer gene loci) and segmental duplications (SD, separated by more than five genes), as in our previous description [28]. The chromosome locations of MAPKKK genes in M. truncatula were drawn using the Circos software (http://circos.ca/) [29], and duplicated genes between different chromosomes or loci were also linked with colored lines in the diagrams.

2.4. Expression Analysis of MtMAPKKK Genes in Growth and Development

Gene expression data involving major organ systems development, particularly the development of nodules and seeds, were downloaded from the Medicago truncatula Gene Expression Atlas (MtGEA) Project (MtGEA, http://mtgea.noble.org/v3/) [30]. Meanwhile, genome-wide transcriptome data from M. truncatula in different tissues during development were downloaded from the NCBI short read archive database (SRA database) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, Accession numbers SRX099057–SRX099062). The expressional profiles of MtMAPKKK genes were retrieved from these expression data, and they were analyzed, clustered, and displayed using ggplot2 of R software (Version 3.1.0).

2.5. Expression Analysis of MtMAPKKK Genes’ Response to Abiotic Stress

An RNA-seq data previously reported by our group, Shu et al. [28], was analyzed for differential expression of MtMAPKKK genes involved in abiotic stress. In brief, the RNA-seq experiment was performed as follows: the seeds of M. truncatula (cv. Jemalong A17) were germinated and grown for eight weeks. Then, these seedlings were grown under normal conditions, cold stress (4 °C), freezing stress (−8 °C), osmotic stress (300 mM mannitol), salt stress (200 mM NaCl), and ABA (100 μM ABA). For each condition, five randomly chosen whole seedlings were pooled to form a biological replicate after three hours’ treatment. All plant samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until use. Total RNA was extracted from six samples, and they were sent to BGI-Shenzhen Ltd. (Shenzhen, China) for construction of pair-end cDNA libraries and performing Illumina sequencing. MtMAPKKK gene expressions across six treatment samples were evaluated using the TopHat [31] and Cufflinks [32] software, and they were analyzed, clustered, and displayed using the ggplot2 of R software (Version 3.1.0).

3. Results

3.1. Identification and Characterization of MAPKKK Family in M. truncatula

To identify the MAPKKK genes family, we used 80 Arabidopsis MAPKKK genes as query sequences to perform a blast search against the M. truncatula genome sequence. In total 73 protein sequences from the M. truncatula were homologous to Arabidopsis MAPKKK genes, with protein kinase domain (PF00069), and they were identified as MAPKKK family genes, named MtMAPKKK01–73 based on their locations on the chromosomes, as Table 1 shows. According to homology with Arabidopsis MAPKKKs, they were classified into three subfamilies, MEKK (28 members), RAF (20 members), and ZIK (25 members). The amino acid sequence lengths of MtMAPKKK varied from 118 (MtMAPKKK73) to 1107 (MtMAPKKK19) amino acids (aa); average length was 532 aa. The number of introns was highly divergent, from one to 14, as Figure 1 shows, which is consistent with MAPKKK genes in Arabidopsis. The introns’ distribution is subfamily specific: members of the ZIK subfamily generally contained the most and the longest introns; next was the MEKK subfamily, and last was the RAF subfamily, which may be involved in expression regulation [33].

Table 1.

List of all MtMAPKKK genes identified in the Medicago truncatula genome.

Gene Name Gene Locus Chromosome Location AA Introns Family Group
MtMPKKK01 Medtr1g021610 chr1:6496817-6500636 671 6 MEKK
MtMPKKK02 Medtr1g021630 chr1:6502386-6507333 677 6 MEKK
MtMPKKK03 Medtr1g021635 chr1:6514070-6517643 675 6 MEKK
MtMPKKK04 Medtr1g105615 chr1:47604242-47607699 507 4 MEKK
MtMPKKK05 Medtr1g105800 chr1:47742832-47746207 654 6 MEKK
MtMPKKK06 Medtr1g105820 chr1:47757298-47760553 672 6 MEKK
MtMPKKK07 Medtr2g011280 chr2:2723023-2726806 842 7 MEKK
MtMPKKK08 Medtr3g019420 chr3:5452378-5457705 822 6 MEKK
MtMPKKK09 Medtr3g019530 chr3:5500322-5504353 779 5 MEKK
MtMPKKK10 Medtr3g051420 chr3:20341370-20344887 781 5 MEKK
MtMPKKK11 Medtr4g081730 chr4:31738243-31741501 667 6 MEKK
MtMPKKK12 Medtr4g117800 chr4:48882742-48885495 492 7 MEKK
MtMPKKK13 Medtr5g005520 chr5:482150-485215 671 6 MEKK
MtMPKKK14 Medtr5g065130 chr5:27367690-27371987 666 6 MEKK
MtMPKKK15 Medtr5g068250 chr5:28854252-28857008 554 7 MEKK
MtMPKKK16 Medtr5g068260 chr5:28859095-28862135 667 7 MEKK
MtMPKKK17 Medtr5g068290 chr5:28874322-28875866 359 4 MEKK
MtMPKKK18 Medtr6g083980 chr6:31351315-31355795 276 5 MEKK
MtMPKKK19 Medtr7g056420 chr7:19934346-19939785 1107 11 MEKK
MtMPKKK20 Medtr7g056617 chr7:20229172-20231645 668 4 MEKK
MtMPKKK21 Medtr7g056647 chr7:20269305-20274777 688 8 MEKK
MtMPKKK22 Medtr7g056657 chr7:20284636-20285367 157 2 MEKK
MtMPKKK23 Medtr7g056680 chr7:20300556-20304825 660 8 MEKK
MtMPKKK24 Medtr8g013560 chr8:4119594-4124466 829 6 MEKK
MtMPKKK25 Medtr8g013580 chr8:4129624-4135154 830 7 MEKK
MtMPKKK26 Medtr8g013620 chr8:4158808-4164403 785 5 MEKK
MtMPKKK27 Medtr8g465580 chr8:23390859-23393309 653 4 MEKK
MtMPKKK28 Medtr0090s0020 scaffold0090:7455-10869 727 6 MEKK
MtMPKKK29 Medtr1g064560 chr1:28404485-28406967 769 0 RAF
MtMPKKK30 Medtr1g103270 chr1:46733948-46736677 383 5 RAF
MtMPKKK31 Medtr3g047890 chr3:15980547-15985045 506 7 RAF
MtMPKKK32 Medtr3g078110 chr3:35189304-35192151 364 5 RAF
MtMPKKK33 Medtr3g116590 chr3:54529585-54535327 447 5 RAF
MtMPKKK34 Medtr4g061833 chr4:22900571-22904005 690 0 RAF
MtMPKKK35 Medtr4g061930 chr4:22952545-22955067 841 0 RAF
MtMPKKK36 Medtr4g106980 chr4:43970220-43975851 393 5 RAF
MtMPKKK37 Medtr4g111925 chr4:46269757-46272346 702 1 RAF
MtMPKKK38 Medtr4g125260 chr4:51937267-51940056 515 4 RAF
MtMPKKK39 Medtr5g006560 chr5:981991-986717 391 7 RAF
MtMPKKK40 Medtr5g092120 chr5:40224346-40226755 373 4 RAF
MtMPKKK41 Medtr6g007603 chr6:1663170-1667871 376 5 RAF
MtMPKKK42 Medtr8g014740 chr8:4708849-4709897 233 2 RAF
MtMPKKK43 Medtr8g014860 chr8:4751582-4753459 283 5 RAF
MtMPKKK44 Medtr8g015340 chr8:4995169-4999969 908 12 RAF
MtMPKKK45 Medtr8g028115 chr8:10454560-10455723 228 3 RAF
MtMPKKK46 Medtr8g064690 chr8:27154367-27158914 673 7 RAF
MtMPKKK47 Medtr8g070910 chr8:30050035-30053755 614 6 RAF
MtMPKKK48 Medtr8g442290 chr8:15952474-15954582 571 3 RAF
MtMPKKK49 Medtr1g013700 chr1:3292908-3294869 424 0 ZIK
MtMPKKK50 Medtr2g016340 chr2:4982022-4983359 446 0 ZIK
MtMPKKK51 Medtr2g045470 chr2:19958506-19965003 466 11 ZIK
MtMPKKK52 Medtr2g049790 chr2:22365714-22373554 461 14 ZIK
MtMPKKK53 Medtr2g105010 chr2:45267272-45268878 445 1 ZIK
MtMPKKK54 Medtr3g086940 chr3:39410214-39413658 348 8 ZIK
MtMPKKK55 Medtr3g099920 chr3:45863019-45866621 493 9 ZIK
MtMPKKK56 Medtr3g466480 chr3:27311509-27312840 444 0 ZIK
MtMPKKK57 Medtr4g006970 chr4:879328-882035 458 0 ZIK
MtMPKKK58 Medtr4g029020 chr4:9994106-9995503 466 0 ZIK
MtMPKKK59 Medtr4g086855 chr4:34076831-34079835 364 8 ZIK
MtMPKKK60 Medtr4g099240 chr4:41124392-41127469 338 8 ZIK
MtMPKKK61 Medtr4g114670 chr4:47183905-47194199 382 10 ZIK
MtMPKKK62 Medtr4g123940 chr4:51095933-51101333 352 7 ZIK
MtMPKKK63 Medtr4g128820 chr4:53613425-53616040 453 13 ZIK
MtMPKKK64 Medtr5g013550 chr5:4318757-4322778 339 8 ZIK
MtMPKKK65 Medtr5g067150 chr5:28353988-28364218 374 12 ZIK
MtMPKKK66 Medtr5g075100 chr5:31902979-31905097 441 1 ZIK
MtMPKKK67 Medtr5g088350 chr5:38344231-38350871 339 10 ZIK
MtMPKKK68 Medtr6g012980 chr6:4042934-4048518 432 8 ZIK
MtMPKKK69 Medtr6g012990 chr6:4049178-4057281 362 10 ZIK
MtMPKKK70 Medtr6g048250 chr6:17403678-17408073 360 7 ZIK
MtMPKKK71 Medtr8g024590 chr8:9075528-9079866 436 13 ZIK
MtMPKKK72 Medtr8g024600 chr8:9083996-9088668 437 13 ZIK
MtMPKKK73 Medtr8g088740 chr8:36861632-36863829 188 6 ZIK
Open in a new tab

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The gene structure analysis of MAPKKK gene family in Medicago truncatula. (A) MEKK subfamily; (B) RAF subfamily; (C) ZIK subfamily.

3.2. Phylogenetic Analysis of MtMAPKKK Genes

To investigate the evolutionary relationships of MtMAPKKK genes, we performed multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis. The results showed that these MtMAPKKK genes were clearly divided into three subfamilies (see Figures 2 and S1), which confirmed their previous classification in Arabidopsis homologues. As shown in Figure 2, there was only one branch in the MEKK subfamily, which suggested that the MEKK subfamily was highly conserved. On the other hand, there were two branches in the phylogenetic tree of the RAF subfamily and three in the ZIK subfamily, which implied that their functions diverged. In the three types, there were many MtMAPKKK genes that diverged less and clustered together; for example, MtMAPKKK01–03 and MtMAPKKK14–17 in MEKK subfamily. These clusters indicated that the MtMAPKKK genes have undergone expansion through gene duplication during the M. truncatula genome evolution process, and these clusters conferred a number of paralogous genes, which might perform the same function in biological processes.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Phylogenetic tree analysis of the MAPKKK gene family in Medicago truncatula.

3.3. Chromosomal Location and Duplication Analysis of MtMAPKKK Genes

Based on physical locations of the MtMAPKKK genes on M. truncatula chromosomes, they were displayed using Circos software, as Figure 3 shows. The results showed that the MtMAPKKK genes (except MtMAPKKK28) are distributed across eight chromosomes, and each chromosome holds different contents of MtMAPKKK genes, ranging from five to 14 members. The chromosomes MtChr4 and MtChr8 contained the most MtMAPKKK genes (14 members), while chromosomes MtChr7 and MtChr9 held the fewest members (five genes). In addition, by blast analysis and database search, we identified 35 pairs of gene duplication events in these MtMAPKKK genes, which arose from tandem duplications (22 pairs) and segment duplications (13 pairs). These duplications led to expansion of the MtMAPKKK family in the M. truncatula genome. Among these duplications, tandem duplications have resulted in MtMAPKKK gene clusters or hot regions; for instance, MtMAPKKK19-22 results in an MEKK subfamily cluster in MtChr7. The segment duplication has resulted in MAPKKK members in different chromosomes—for example, duplication between MtMAPKKK01–03 and MtMAPKKK14–17 had expanded the MEKK subfamily from MtChr1 to MtChr5; the clustering was also confirmed by phylogenetic analysis.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Chromosomal distribution and expansion analysis of MtMAPKKK genes in Medicago truncatula. Red lines show duplications between members of the MEKK subfamily, blue lines show duplications between members of the RAF subfamily, and purple lines show duplications between members of the ZIK subfamily.

3.4. In Silico Expression Analysis of MtMAPKKK Genes Involved in Growth and Development

To investigate MtMAPKKK genes’ expression in plant growth and development, expression data of M. truncatula were collected from MtGEA and NCBI, including microarray data and high-throughput sequencing data. Expression profiles of MtMAPKKK genes were retrieved and analyzed, as Figure 4 and Figure 5 show. According to the microarray data, these MtMAPKKK genes were clustered into three groups. Group A genes, including MtMAPKKK05, 06, 16, 44, 47, 49, 51, 66, and 67, were expressed in different tissues; expression was associated with tissue development. Group B genes, including MtMAPKKK19, 31, 33, 34, 41, 57, 63, 64, and 71, were expressed during seed development. In the last group, including MtMAPKKK03, 06, 09, 18, 24, 25, 38, 42, 49, 52, 54, 66, 68, and 71, expression was associated with the nodulation process in M. truncatula. These results suggested that MtMAPKKK genes were expressed in specific tissues or during different stages of development, with a potential role in the development processes of M. truncatula. In addition, expression profiles of these MtMAPKKK genes from high-throughput sequencing were confirmed by the results in microarray expression (see Figure 5A); for example, MtMAPKKK40, 49, and 58 were specifically expressed in flowers both in microarray and high-throughput sequencing. Similarly, MAPKKK44 was also confirmed to be expressed in buds by two datasets. However, there were 39 MtMAPKKK genes detected in high-throughput sequencing data, which was slightly more than in the microarray dataset (32 MtMAPKKK genes).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Expression profile cluster analysis of MtMAPKKK genes involved in growth and development. The expression data were clustered and displayed using software ggplot2. The DAP infers days after pollination, while DPI infers days after inoculation; the information on samples is from Benedito et al. [30].

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Expression profile cluster analysis of MtMAPKKK genes involving in tissue development (A) and response to abiotic stress (B).

3.5. Expression Analysis of MtMAPKKK Genes in Response to Abiotic Stresses

With the development of next sequencing technology, we have performed RNA-seq to identified MtMAPKKK genes’ response to abiotic stress. There were 32 MtMAPKKK genes expressed in six samples, while 15 MtMAPKKK genes were differentially expressed under abiotic stress, including cold (five members), freezing (five members), osmotic (two members), salt (eight members) and ABA (four members) treatments (see Figure 5B). Among these MtMAPKKK genes, MtMAPKKK49 was upregulated by all stresses, while other MtMAPKKK genes were differentially affected by treatment. For example, MtMAPKKK36, 41, 51, 54, 66, 67, 71, and 72 were highly expressed under cold stress, but had no expression or very low expression in other stresses. Similarly, MtMAPKKK18, 65, 26, 46, 06, and 38 were specifically expressed under freezing stress; MtMAPKKK32, 44, 59, 62, 69, and 70 were expressed under osmotic stress; MtMAPKKK01, 04, 33, 39 and 49 were present in salt stress; and MtMAPKKK31, 52, 57, 59, and 60 were responsive to ABA stimuli. Compared to ABA treatment, we found that there were some correlation between osmotic and salt stress with ABA treatment, such as in MtMAPKKK52, 57, 59, and 60. However, there were no common MAPKKK members expressed in both cold and freezing conditions with ABA treatment, implying that these MtMAPKKK genes may have a role in osmotic and salt stresses through the ABA regulation pathway, but may not have a role in cold and freezing stresses.

4. Discussion

In previous studies, MAPK signaling cascade pathways played important roles in various processes, including developmental processes, biotic, and abiotic stress responses [1,8]. To date, a large number of MAPKKK genes have been identified and characterized in plants, including Arabidopsis [14], rice [12], grapevines [34], maize [16], soybeans [17], and tomatoes [35]. However, the M. truncatula genome has been reported [19], and both the MAPK and MAPKK gene families have been identified and characterized [20]; until now the MAPKKK gene family has not been reported. In the present research, we performed genome-wide analysis for the MAPKKK family in M. truncatula, and 73 MtMAPKKK genes were identified by homologous searching and domain analysis. The number of MtMAPKKK genes is similar to their members in Arabidopsis, rice, maize, and tomatoes, but half that of the soybean MAPKKK family, which is an allopolyploid species (see Table 2). The results showed that the MAPKKK family is highly conserved in the plants. Based on characteristic sequence motifs, they were divided into three subfamilies, MEKK, RAF, and ZIK, as is done for other plants [14,12]. However, the numbers of subfamilies diverge from other plants, such as Arabidopsis, rice, maize, and tomatoes. The MEKK subfamily has 28 members, which is consistent with other plants (see Table 2), implying that it is the most conservative subfamily in M. truncatula. By gene duplication analysis, we identified 24 duplication events in the MEKK subfamily; 19 of them are tandem duplication events, which have conferred MEKK gene clusters in the M. truncatula genome, such as MtMAPKKK01-03, MtMAPKKK04-06 on MtChr01, MtMAPKKK14-17 on MtChr05, and MtMAPKKK19-23 on MtChr07. These results strongly suggested that tandem duplications mainly contributed to conservation of the MEKK subfamily in M. truncatula (see Figure 2). Compared to the MEKK subfamily, the RAF and ZIK subfamilies are more divergent. There are RAF genes in M. truncatula, but fewer than in other plants (see Table 2). However, the ZIK subfamily has more members (25), implying that ZIK genes have expanded. This divergence is present not in terms of numbers of members, but in gene structures. The MEKK genes contain 4 to 7 introns, while RAF has 0–6 introns, and the ZIK subfamily varied from 0 to 13 (see Table 1 and Figure 1). The intron is an important regulator of gene expression in eukaryotes; more introns generally indicate more complex regulation, which may be an important role in complex biological processes, such as tissue development in response to abiotic stress [33]. It is worth noting that MtMAPKKK gene duplication conferred similar gene structures, such as MtMAPKKK01::03 (MEKK), MtMAPKKK05::06 (MEKK), MtMAPKKK36::41 (RAF), MtMAPKKK71::72 (ZIK), etc., which suggests they would have similar expression profiles and function in M. truncatula.

Table 2.

The numbers of MAPKKK genes in plant genomes.

Species MAPKKK Total number of MAPKKKs
MEKK RAF ZIK
Arabidopsis 21 48 11 80
tomato 33 40 16 89
rice 22 43 10 75
maize 22 46 6 74
soybean 34 92 24 150
M. truncatula 28 20 25 73
Open in a new tab

In Arabidopsis, the MAPKKK family has undergone a large expansion through gene duplication, resulting in 80 members across three subfamilies [36]. In the expansion process, there were a number of paralogous genes produced by gene duplication, whose expressions and functions differed in the evolutionary process [37]. In M. truncatula, MtMAPKKK genes have also undergone a gene duplication process, which conferred paralogous gene pairs, such as MtMAPKKK01::03 (MEKK), MtMAPKKK05::06 (MEKK), MtMAPKKK32::36::41 (RAF), MtMAPKKK71::72 (ZIK), as previously described. Generally, these genes have similar expression profiles, such as MtMAPKKK05::06 (MEKK). These two MEKK genes were both highly expressed in leaves, while they were absent or less expressed in the seed development process (see Figure 4). A similar process happened in MtMAPKKK71::72 (ZIK): they were both highly induced by cold stress, but less expressed in response to other stresses (see Figure 5). However, the duplication gene pairs can also differ in expression level, for example, MtMAPKKK32::36::41. They were expanded to three chromosomes (MtChr03, 04, and 06; see Figure 3) by segment duplication events, and they had different expression levels (see Figure 6). MtMAPKKK36 was more highly expressed than MtMAPKKK41, and MtMAPKKK41 was more highly expressed than MtMAPKKK32. In addition, MtMAPKKK36 and 41 expression constituted the tissue development and response to abiotic stresses, implying their identical and essential functions during plant development and abiotic stress response processes. By contrast, MtMAPKKK32 was expressed in tissue development, specifically in flowers, which indicated its important role in flower development (see Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

The expression profiles of MtMAPKKK32::36::41 involved in tissue development and response to abiotic stress.

On a global scale, plant growth and development are threatened by various abiotic stresses, such as cold, drought, and salinity [38]. Therefore, plants should have the ability to constantly adapt to unfavorable environmental conditions. They employ complex regulatory mechanisms for undergoing physiological and biochemical changes in response to stresses [8,39]. MAPK signaling cascade pathways play a remarkably important role in the sensing and transmitting of stress signals, which is an essential step in the establishment of tolerance to various stresses [1,10]. The MAPKKK family has the most members in MAPK signaling pathways, and they are widely expressed to regulate plant processes, including growth, development, and response to abiotic stresses [6]. In our study, we investigated the expression profiles of MtMAPKKK genes using microarray and RNA-seq data from NCBI and our previous research [28]. The expression data were clustered and visualized using a heat-map method, and the results show a wide range of expression levels and distinct regulation during plant development and response to biotic and/or abiotic stresses. In M. truncatula growth and tissue development, the expression of MtMAPKKK genes overlaps among these tissues and organs. It is notable that many MtMAPKKK genes are typically expressed in specific tissues, such as MtMAPKKK05, 06, and 16 (MEKK subfamily) in leaves (see Figure 4); for MtMAPKKK40, 41, present in flowers, this finding is consistent with how MAPKKK genes are expressed in Arabidopsis [38]. Based on our analysis of abiotic stress expression data, we found that a large number of MtMAPKKK genes were highly responsive to abiotic stress; some of them were specifically responsive to selected abiotic stresses (see Figure 5). For example, MtMAPKKK66, 71, and 72 (ZIK subfamily) were induced by cold stress; MtMAPKKK33 was induced by salt stress; MtMAPKKK69, 70 were repressed by freezing stress. However, Menges et al. have investigated the expressions of all members of the MAPKKK family through a large number of microarrays in Arabidopsis [37]; because of limited samples, there are still 38 MtMAPKKK genes that have not been implicated in M. truncatula development and/or response to abiotic stress in the present research. We need more biological samples involving various development processes, or more time points of abiotic stress, to reveal the expression profiles of MtMAPKKK genes, which will be useful for determining their function in the future.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we have identified 73 MtMAPKKK genes in M. truncatula; they were classified into three subfamilies based on phylogenetic analysis. Meanwhile, their expression profiles have been investigated using microarray and a high-throughput sequencing dataset; the results revealed their regulation roles in plant growth and tissue development, especially their essential functions in nodule development. In addition, an RNA-seq experiment was performed to explore their regulation in response to abiotic stresses, implying that MAPKKK family genes broadly participated in the abiotic response process in M. truncatula. The information from this investigation will be useful for the identification and characterization of MtMAPKKK genes whose function will be explored in the future.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31302019 and 31470571), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M571430), the MOST 863 project (2013AA102607-5), and the Heilongjiang Province Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. LBH-Z14126).

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:

MAPKKK

Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase

MtGEA

Medicago truncatula Gene Expression Atlas

NCBI

National Center for Biotechnology Information

ROS

reactive oxygen species

SRA

short read archive

MtChr

M. truncatula chromosomes

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (1.5MB, pdf)

The following figure are available online at www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/7/4/13/s1. Figure S1: Phylogenetic tree analysis of both MtMAPKKK and AtMAPKKK genes.

Author Contributions

Yongjun Shu, Changhong Guo, and Wei Li conceived and designed the experiments; Wei Li, Hanyun Xu, and Lili Song performed the experiments; Wei Li and Yongjun Shu analyzed the data; Wei Li, Yongjun Shu, and Changhong Guo wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Colcombet J., Hirt H. Arabidopsis MAPKs: A complex signalling network involved in multiple biological processes. Biochem. J. 2008;413:217–226. doi: 10.1042/BJ20080625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Doczi R., Okresz L., Romero A.E., Paccanaro A., Bogre L. Exploring the evolutionary path of plant MAPK networks. Trends Plant Sci. 2012;17:518–525. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ichimura K., Shinozaki K., Tena G., Sheen J., Henry Y., Champion A., Kreis M., Zhang S., Hirt H., Wilson C., et al. Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in plants a new nomenclature. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7:301–308. doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02302-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Asai T. MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Nature. 2002;415:977–983. doi: 10.1038/415977a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Caunt C.J., Keyse S.M. Dual-specificity MAP kinase phosphatases (MKPs) FEBS J. 2013;280:489–504. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08716.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mohanta T.K., Arora P.K., Mohanta N., Parida P., Bae H. Identification of new members of the MAPK gene family in plants shows diverse conserved domains and novel activation loop variants. BMC Genomics. 2015 doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1244-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Krysan P.J. An Arabidopsis mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase gene family encodes essential positive regulators of cytokinesis. Plant Cell. 2002;14:1109–1120. doi: 10.1105/tpc.001164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Musielak T.J., Bayer M. YODA signalling in the early Arabidopsis embryo. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2014;42:408–412. doi: 10.1042/BST20130230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pitzschke A., Schikora A., Hirt H. MAPK cascade signalling networks in plant defence. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009;12:421–426. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Xie F., Qiu L., Wen C.K. Possible modulation of Arabidopsis ETR1 N-terminal signaling by CTR1. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012;7:1243–1245. doi: 10.4161/psb.21545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tang D., Christiansen K.M., Innes R.W. Regulation of plant disease resistance, stress responses, cell death, and ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis by the EDR1 protein kinase. Plant Physiol. 2005;138:1018–1026. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.060400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tena G., Asai T., Chiu W.L., Sheen J. Plant mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling cascades. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001;4:392–400. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00191-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ning J., Li X., Hicks L.M., Xiong L. A Raf-like MAPKKK gene DSM1 mediates drought resistance through reactive oxygen species scavenging in rice. Plant Physiol. 2010;152:876–890. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.149856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Melech-Bonfil S., Sessa G. Tomato MAPKKKε is a positive regulator of cell-death signaling networks associated with plant immunity. Plant J. 2010;64:379–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04333.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kong Q., Qu N., Gao M., Zhang Z., Ding X., Yang F., Li Y., Dong O.X., Chen S., Li X., et al. The MEKK1-MKK1/MKK2-MPK4 kinase cascade negatively regulates immunity mediated by a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2012;24:2225–2236. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.097253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rao K.P., Richa T., Kumar K., Raghuram B., Sinha A.K. In silico analysis reveals 75 members of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase gene family in rice. DNA Res. 2010;17:139–153. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsq011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kong X., Lv W., Zhang D., Jiang S., Zhang S., Li D. Genome-wide identification and analysis of expression profiles of maize mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Neupane A., Nepal M.P., Piya S., Subramanian S., Rohila J.S., Reese R.N., Benson B.V. Identification, nomenclature, and evolutionary relationships of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) genes in soybean. Evol. Bioinform. 2013;9:363–386. doi: 10.4137/EBO.S12526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Young N.D., Debelle F., Oldroyd G.E., Geurts R., Cannon S.B., Udvardi M.K., Benedito V.A., Mayer K.F., Gouzy J., Schoof H., et al. The Medicago genome provides insight into the evolution of rhizobial symbioses. Nature. 2011;480:520–524. doi: 10.1038/nature10625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Neupane A., Nepal M.P., Piya S., Benson B.V., MacArthur K.J. Evolutionary history of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) genes in Lotus, Medicago, and Phaseolus. Plant Signal. Behav. 2013 doi: 10.4161/psb.27189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang J., Pan C., Wang Y., Ye L., Wu J., Chen L., Zou T., Lu G. Genome-wide identification of MAPK, MAPKK, and MAPKKK gene families and transcriptional profiling analysis during development and stress response in cucumber. BMC Genomics. 2015 doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1621-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen L.H., Hu W., Tan S.L., Wang M., Ma Z.B., Zhou S.Y. Genome-wide identification and analysis of MAPK and MAPKK gene families in Brachypodium distachyon. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Janitza P., Ullrich K.K., Quint M. Toward a comprehensive phylogenetic reconstruction of the evolutionary history of mitogen-activated protein kinases in the plant kingdom. Front. Plant Sci. 2012 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hu B., Jin J., Guo A.Y., Zhang H., Luo J., Gao G. GSDS 2.0: An upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:1296–1297. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Thompson J.D., Gibson T.J., Higgins D.G. Multiple sequence alignment using ClustalW and ClustalX. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics. 2003 doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0203s00. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011;28:2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lee T.H., Tang H., Wang X., Paterson A.H. PGDD: A database of gene and genome duplication in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:1152–1158. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shu Y., Zhang J., Song L., Guo C. Genome-wide analysis of the AP2/ERF superfamily genes and their responses to abiotic stress in Medicago truncatula. Front. Plant Sci. 2015 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Krzywinski M., Schein J., Birol I., Connors J., Gascoyne R., Horsman D., Jones S.J., Marra M.A. Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009;19:1639–1645. doi: 10.1101/gr.092759.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Benedito V.A., Torres-Jerez I., Murray J.D., Andriankaja A., Allen S., Kakar K., Wandrey M., Verdier J., Zuber H., Ott T., et al. A gene expression atlas of the model legume Medicago truncatula. Plant J. 2008;55:504–513. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03519.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Traprell C., Pachter L., Salzberg S.L. TopHat: Discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1105–1111. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Trapnell C., Roberts A., Goff L., Pertea G., Kim D. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat. Protoc. 2012;7:562–578. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Callis J., Fromm M., Walbot V. Introns increase gene expression in cultured maize cells. Genes Dev. 1987;1:1183–1200. doi: 10.1101/gad.1.10.1183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang G., Lovato A., Polverari A., Wang M., Liang Y.H., Ma Y.C., Cheng Z.M. Genome-wide identification and analysis of mitogen activated protein kinase kinase kinase gene family in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) BMC Plant Biol. 2014 doi: 10.1186/s12870-014-0219-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wu J., Wang J., Pan C., Guan X., Wang Y., Liu S., He Y., Chen J., Chen L., Lu G. Genome-wide identification of MAPKK and MAPKKK gene families in tomato and transcriptional profiling analysis during development and stress response. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hamel L.P., Nicole M.C., Sritubtim S., Morency M.J., Ellis M., Ehlting J., Beaudoin N., Barbazuk B., Klessig D., Lee J., et al. Ancient signals: comparative genomics of plant MAPK and MAPKK gene families. Trends Plant Sci. 2006;11:192–198. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Menges M., Dóczi R., Ökrész L., Morandini P., Mizzi L., Soloviev M., Bögre L. Comprehensive gene expression atlas for the Arabidopsis MAP kinase signalling pathways. New Phytol. 2008;179:643–662. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02552.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.O'Brien J.A., Benkova E. Cytokinin cross-talking during biotic and abiotic stress responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2013 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Opdenakker K., Remans T., Vangronsveld J., Cuypers A. Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases in plant metal stress: Regulation and responses in comparison to other biotic and abiotic stresses. Mol. Sci. 2012;13:7828–7853. doi: 10.3390/ijms13067828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (1.5MB, pdf)

Articles from Genes are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES