Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 1997 Mar;77(3):234–237. doi: 10.1136/hrt.77.3.234

Does reducing capacitance have potential for further miniaturisation of implantable defibrillators?

E Alt 1, F Evans 1, P D Wolf 1, J Pasquantonio 1, L Stotts 1, S Heinz 1, A Schömig 1
PMCID: PMC484688  PMID: 9093040

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether considerably smaller capacitors could replace 125 microF capacitors as the standard for use in implantable defibrillators. METHODS: Measured energy, impedance, voltage, and current delivered were compared at defibrillation threshold in 10 mongrel dogs for defibrillation using 75 microF and 125 microF capacitors alternated randomly. Defibrillation was attempted with biphasic shocks of comparable tilt between an endocardial lead in the right ventricular apex and a "dummy" active can of an experimental implantable device placed in the subpectoral position. RESULTS: A reduction of capacitor size of 40% was associated with an increase in voltage of 21% and in current of 22%. With a 65% tilt, no significant differences were found between the two capacitances with respect to the impedance or energy required for defibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple advances in electrode material, electrode configuration, shock morphology, and shock polarity have reduced defibrillation energy requirements. Smaller capacitors could be used in implantable cardioverter/defibrillators without a major decrease in effectiveness.

Full text

PDF
234

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alt E. U., Fotuhi P. C., Callihan R. L., Mestre E., Smith W. M., Ideker R. E. Endocardial carbon-braid electrodes. A new concept for lower defibrillation thresholds. Circulation. 1995 Sep 15;92(6):1627–1633. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.6.1627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alt E. U., Fotuhi P. C., Callihan R. L., Rollins D. L., Mestre E., Combs M. P., Smith W. M., Ideker R. E. Improved defibrillation threshold with a new epicardial carbon electrode compared with a standard epicardial titanium patch. Circulation. 1995 Jan 15;91(2):445–450. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.2.445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bardy G. H., Dolack G. L., Kudenchuk P. J., Poole J. E., Mehra R., Johnson G. Prospective, randomized comparison in humans of a unipolar defibrillation system with that using an additional superior vena cava electrode. Circulation. 1994 Mar;89(3):1090–1093. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.3.1090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bardy G. H., Johnson G., Poole J. E., Dolack G. L., Kudenchuk P. J., Kelso D., Mitchell R., Mehra R., Hofer B. A simplified, single-lead unipolar transvenous cardioversion-defibrillation system. Circulation. 1993 Aug;88(2):543–547. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.2.543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Daubert J. P., Frazier D. W., Wolf P. D., Franz M. R., Smith W. M., Ideker R. E. Response of relatively refractory canine myocardium to monophasic and biphasic shocks. Circulation. 1991 Dec;84(6):2522–2538. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.84.6.2522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fotuhi P. C., Ideker R. E., Idriss S. F., Callihan R. L., Walker R. G., Alt E. U. Influence of epicardial patches on defibrillation threshold with nonthoracotomy lead configurations. Circulation. 1995 Nov 15;92(10):3082–3088. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.10.3082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Guse P. A., Kavanagh K. M., Alferness C. A., Wolf P. D., Rollins D., Hagler J., Smith W. M., Ideker R. E. Defibrillation with low voltage using a left ventricular catheter and four cutaneous patch electrodes in dogs. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Mar;14(3):443–451. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb04093.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ideker R. E., Wolf P. D., Alferness C., Krassowska W., Smith W. M. Current concepts for selecting the location, size and shape of defibrillation electrodes. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Feb;14(2 Pt 1):227–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb05093.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kavanagh K. M., Tang A. S., Rollins D. L., Smith W. M., Ideker R. E. Comparison of the internal defibrillation thresholds for monophasic and double and single capacitor biphasic waveforms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 Nov 1;14(5):1343–1349. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90439-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Leonelli F. M., Kroll M. W., Brewer J. E. Defibrillation thresholds are lower with smaller storage capacitors. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Sep;18(9 Pt 1):1661–1665. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb06987.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mirowski M., Reid P. R., Mower M. M., Watkins L., Gott V. L., Schauble J. F., Langer A., Heilman M. S., Kolenik S. A., Fischell R. E. Termination of malignant ventricular arrhythmias with an implanted automatic defibrillator in human beings. N Engl J Med. 1980 Aug 7;303(6):322–324. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198008073030607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Powell A. C., Fuchs T., Finkelstein D. M., Garan H., Cannom D. S., McGovern B. A., Kelly E., Vlahakes G. J., Torchiana D. F., Ruskin J. N. Influence of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on the long-term prognosis of survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation. 1993 Sep;88(3):1083–1092. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.3.1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Swerdlow C. D., Kass R. M., Chen P. S., Hwang C., Raissi S. Effect of capacitor size and pathway resistance on defibrillation threshold for implantable defibrillators. Circulation. 1994 Oct;90(4):1840–1846. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.4.1840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tang A. S., Yabe S., Wharton J. M., Dolker M., Smith W. M., Ideker R. E. Ventricular defibrillation using biphasic waveforms: the importance of phasic duration. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 Jan;13(1):207–214. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90572-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES