Skip to main content
American Journal of Translational Research logoLink to American Journal of Translational Research
. 2016 Feb 15;8(2):516–529.

Upregulated human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) expression is associated with spinal chordoma growth, invasion and poor prognosis

Ming-Xiang Zou 1, Guo-Hua Lv 1, Jing Li 1, Xiao-Ling She 2, Yi Jiang 2
PMCID: PMC4846901  PMID: 27158344

Abstract

Altered expression or activity of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) has been associated with human carcinogenesis. This study detected hTERT expression in spinal chordoma tissues and associated the level of hTERT expression with clinicopathological data and patient survival. Tissue samples from 54 patients and 20 controls were subjected to immunohistochemical analysis of hTERT protein levels. hTERT expression levels were then analyzed for associations with patient survival rates and clinicopathological parameters (such as age, gender, tumor size, location, tumor grade, tumor stage, muscle invasion, recurrence or not, type of resection, tumor hemorrhage, tumor necrosis, levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and Ki-67 expression). hTERT expression was detected in all 54 spinal chordomas. Expression levels were weak in 7, moderate in 17 and strong in 30 spinal chordoma tissue samples. In contrast, hTERT was rarely expressed in nucleus pulposus tissues (20 samples). hTERT expression was significantly associated with the Ki-67-staining index (t = -6.616, p < 0.001), TIL levels (F = 5.27, p = 0.008) and tumor invasion of the surrounding muscle tissue (t = -4.49, p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that high hTERT expression was significantly associated with poor local recurrence-free survival of patients (χ2 = 19.07, p < 0.001 via the log-rank test), but not associated with overall patient survival. Multivariate analysis of local recurrence-free survival demonstrated that hTERT expression was an independent prognostic factor among spinal chordoma patients (HR = 1.013, 95% CI: 1.002-1.024, p = 0.016). High hTERT expression was associated with spinal chordoma growth, invasion and poor patient prognosis. Future studies will investigate the use of hTERT as a biomarker to predict patient prognosis and disease progression or as a potential spinal chordoma therapy target.

Keywords: Chordoma, human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT), biomarker, prognosis

Introduction

Chordoma is a very rare, slow growing and locally invasive malignant mesenchymal tumor with a low to intermediate grade of malignancy that originates from remnants of the embryonic notochord [1-3]. The etiology and risk factors of chordoma remain unknown; however, multiple family cases and genetic predispositions have been reported in association with chordoma development [4,5]. Chordoma occurs in approximately one case per million in the worldwide population [6]. Chordoma occurs preferentially in the axial skeleton, including the sacrum (50-60%), the spheno-occipital region (25-30%) and the cervical (10%) and thoracolumbar vertebrae (5%) [7]. Chordoma therapy usually consists of complete surgical resection followed by radiation therapy, and this strategy promises the best long-term control of the disease [8,9]; however, incomplete resection plus radiotherapy in patients with late stage disease may result in tumor recurrence because standard chemotherapy and conventional radiotherapy have poor sensitivity [10-12]. Therefore, it has been suggested that tumor free resection margins are likely the most important factor determining chordoma recurrence and long-term patient prognosis [13-16]. However, achieving wide resection margins with chordoma lesions is often technically difficult due to the proximity of the lesion to vital neurovascular structures and invasion of the tumor into surrounding soft tissues [17]. Therefore, better understanding of chordoma biology [18] and biomarkers capable of predicting patient prognosis and treatment responses [3] are needed to improve treatment outcomes, provide new therapeutic targets and ensure that chordoma patients receive optimal treatment.

Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) is a 127-kDa protein with a reverse transcriptase motif in its C-terminal [19,20]. hTERT is a rate-limiting component during the formation of the telomerase complex and helps form the structure of telomeric DNA at the ends of human chromosomes by synthesizing telomeric sequences de novo via an internal RNA template [19,21]. hTERT expression is undetectable in normal somatic cells, but is essential for unlimited cell growth [22,23]. Previous studies have reported high levels of hTERT expression in various human cancers, including gastric and colorectal cancers, ampullary carcinoma, glioma and oral squamous cell carcinoma [20-22,24-26]. Increased hTERT expression has also been associated with tumor recurrence and poor prognosis in some of these cancer types [21,22,26]. Few studies have investigated hTERT expression in spinal chordoma [3,27]. Therefore, we investigated hTERT expression in spinal chordoma using immunohistochemistry to associate telomerase expression with the clinicopathological features of chordoma tumors and patient survival.

Materials and methods

Patients and tissue samples

This study enrolled 54 patients with spinal chordoma who were admitted for surgical treatment in The Department of Spine Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University between June 2002 and April 2015. All patients were diagnosed using histopathology according to criteria described in a previous study [4]. In the current study, we collected retrospective clinicopathological data from the patients’ medical records, including patient age and gender, tumor size, location, grade, stage and muscle invasion status, primary vs. recurrent chordoma, the type of surgical resection performed, tumor hemorrhage, necrosis and the extent of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs; Table 1). None of the enrolled patients had received any form of tumor-specific therapy before surgical excision of the tumor lesion, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy. This study was approved by the hospital ethical committee of The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, and consent was obtained from each patient before participation in this study.

Table 1.

Association of hTERT expression with clinicopathological data of patients

Clinicopathological factors Number of patients The mean hTERT level (%) p-value
Age (years) ≤ 50 23 180.87 ± 75.03 0.38
> 50 31 197.13 ± 61.11
Sex Male 35 201.83 ± 65.88 0.084
Female 19 168.79 ± 65.99
Tumor size (cm) ≤ 5 21 195.86 ± 71.46 0.62
> 5 33 186.61 ± 65.23
Tumor location Sacral vertebra 42 188.55 ± 66.54 0.73
Cervical or thoracic or lumbar vertebra 12 190.00 ± 72.19
Tumor invasion into the Surrounding muscle Yes 35 215.17 ± 61.68 0.000a
No 19 144.21 ± 51.65
Preoperative recurrence Yes 11 189.18 ± 65.76 0.95
No 43 190.47 ± 68.34
Grade High 38 186.24 ± 66.57 0.50
Low 16 199.63 ± 69.96
Stage IA 13 188.31 ± 71.28 0.76
IB 6 223.00 ± 65.32
IIA 4 200.75 ± 71.78
IIB 27 184.07 ± 67.78
III 4 178.00 ± 67.43
Type of resection Enneking inappropriate 17 201.12 ± 65.30 0.42
Enneking appropriate 37 185.19 ± 68.36
Tumor hemorrhage No 10 185.30 ± 77.98 0.80
Yes 44 191.32 ± 65.48
Tumor necrosis Absent 13 192.08 ± 60.42 0.42
Mild 18 207.06 ± 65.61
Moderate 15 167.53 ± 66.92
Severe 8 191.75 ± 81.78
Level of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes Absent 0 0.00 ± 0.00 0.008b
Rare/few 23 159.17 ± 63.44
Moderate 15 204.00 ± 56.76
Prominent 16 221.88 ± 65.67
Ki-67 index Low 25 142.24± 43.00 0.000a
High 29 231.55 ± 56.04
a

by Student’s t test;

b

by One-Way ANOVA test.

The number of TILs was evaluated using hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections. Following methods established in a previous study, TILs were scored as absent, rare/few, moderate or prominent (Figure 1) [28]. Tumor resections were categorized as wide, marginal, intralesional or palliative by a pathologist during macroscopic and histological evaluation of tumor specimens. These specimens were categorized as Enneking appropriate or Enneking inappropriate according to the Enneking principles [29]. Tumor invasion of surrounding muscle tissue was confirmed using preoperative magnetic resonance images and pathologic examination [1]. Preoperative recurrence indicated that the patient had previously received surgical tumor excision and had confirmed relapse upon admission. Tumor grade and stage were evaluated according to the Enneking staging system for the surgical staging of malignant bone and soft tissue tumors [2,30].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Representative illustration of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in chordoma tissues (×200) that have been stained with hematoxylin and eosin. (A) Rare/few TILs, (B) Moderate TILs, (C) Prominent TILs.

Follow-up of patients

Follow-up examinations of all patients were performed every three months during the first two years, every six months for the following three years and annually thereafter. Local relapse-free survival (LRFS) was defined as the time interval from tumor resection to the diagnosis of the first local recurrence. Recurrent tumors were diagnosed using clinical examinations and magnetic resonance imaging [3]. Similarly, overall survival (OS) was defined as the interval between the date of surgery and death related to any cause. Observations were censored when the patient was tumor-free (LRFS analysis) or alive (OS analysis) until September 2015.

Tissue specimens

Twenty nucleus pulposus tissue samples were also collected as control tissues from 20 patients who underwent surgical resection to treat disc herniation. These control patients (14 males and 6 females, 24 to 79 years of age, with a mean age of 48.30 ± 16.90 years) were randomly selected and the differences in sex and age distribution between the chordoma and control patient groups were not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.175, p = 0.67 and t = 1.919, p = 0.059, respectively). Tissue samples from both patient groups were immediately obtained after surgery, fixed in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. The paraffin blocks from tumor and normal tissues were processed into 4 µM thick sections. To confirm chordoma diagnosis, tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and then examined by two pathologists who confirmed the diagnosis of chordoma of conventional subtype in all patients.

Immunohistochemistry and data scoring

Immunohistochemical staining was conducted using a peroxidase-labeled streptavidin-biotin technique [20]. In brief, tissue sections were deparaffinized with two xylene incubations, rehydrated in a series of ethanol washes and then subjected to antigen retrieval using a pressure cooker at 121°C for 15 min in 0.01 M citrate buffer, pH 6.0. Tissue sections were then incubated with 3% H2O2 in methanol for 15 min to quench any endogenous peroxidase activity. After being rinsed in phosphate buffer solution (PBS), sections were incubated in 10% normal goat serum for 30 min at room temperature to block any potential non-specific binding of the secondary antibody. Next, sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with anti-hTERT (ab183105, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) at a dilution of 1:50 or anti-Ki-67 (ab16667, Abcam) at a dilution of 1:100. The next day, tissue sections were rinsed with PBS and then incubated with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin at room temperature for 30 min, followed by a streptavidin-peroxidase conjugate (Auragene, Changsha, Hunan, China). Antibody binding was visualized by brief incubation with 3,3’-diaminobenzidine solution. Finally, sections were lightly counterstained using hematoxylin. Negative controls were generated by replacing the primary antibody with PBS or 10% normal serum, and positive controls were created using tissue sections generated from human tonsil tissue according to the manufacturer’s suggestion.

Immunochemical results were independently scored by two experienced pathologists (SXL and JY) who were blinded to the patients’ clinicopathological data and outcomes. The pathologists reviewed immunostained tissue sections under a light microscope and counted brown cytoplasmic or nuclear staining of tumor cells as positive for hTERT expression and nuclear staining for Ki-67 expression. Tissue sections were initially scanned at low power, then five high power fields were randomly selected and at least 1000 cells were counted in each randomly selected section. The pathologists then semiquantitatively scored hTERT expression in chordoma and control tissue sections according to the methods described in a previous study [20]. The staining intensity of cells was graded as 0 (negative), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate) and 3 (strong). Staining percentage was scored as the ratio of positively immunostained cells to the total number of cells counted. For each case, the staining intensity (0-3) and staining percentage (0-100%) scores were multiplied to obtain the final staining score. For the subsequent survival analysis, the mean hTERT expression scores were used as the cut-off values for high and low level hTERT expression. Additionally, the Ki-67-staining index score was obtained from the percentage of cells with nuclear staining, and these data were divided into low (< 10% of cells with positive nuclear staining) or high (≥ 10% of cells with positive nuclear staining) Ki-67 expression according to the methods described in a previous study [1].

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 software from SPSS Inc. (Chicago, IL, USA). Associations between hTERT expression levels, the clinicopathological characteristics of spinal chordoma patients (e.g. patient age and tumor characteristics) and the Ki-67-staining index were analyzed using (as appropriate) Student’s t tests and One-Way ANOVA tests. The receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to analyze the sensitivity of hTERT expression [31]. LRFS and OS were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves and analyzed using the log-rank test. hTERT was divided into low and high expression groups according to mean expression scores to determine the survival probability associated with different levels of hTERT expression. To account for potential confounding factors, multivariate analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazard model to assess whether hTERT expression could independently predict patient outcome. This analysis included factors found to be significant by univariate analysis. All p values were two-sided, and a p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

Tissue specimens were collected from 54 patients with spinal chordoma who were admitted to The Department of Spine Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital for surgical treatment. There were 35 males and 19 females, with an average age of 55.59 ± 13.56 years (range, 23 to 79 years). Forty-three of these patients had primary spinal chordoma and 11 had recurrent chordoma. All patients were followed until September 2015, with a mean follow-up period of 42.39 months (range, 5 to 158 months). All other patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

hTERT protein expression in chordoma tissue specimens

We analyzed hTERT expression in the surgical tissue specimens from the 54 spinal chordoma patients and 20 controls and found that hTERT protein was expressed in all tumor tissues. Immunostaining of chordoma cell nuclei was weak in 7 specimens (12.96%), moderate in 17 specimens (31.48%) and strong in 30 specimens (55.56%; Figure 2A-C). In contrast, hTERT expression was rarely observed in the nucleus pulposus control tissues (Figure 2D, 2E). The mean hTERT-staining score was 190.20 ± 67.20% in chordoma tissues vs. 13.95 ± 19.23% in nucleus pulposus samples (t = 17.440, p < 0.001; Figure 2F). We conducted ROC analysis to determine the differential diagnosis value of hTERT expression in spinal chordoma vs. nucleus pulposus tissues. We found that hTERT levels could serve as a diagnostic marker for spinal chordoma (Figure 3B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Immunohistochemistry analysis of hTERT expression levels. (A) Weak expression of hTERT in chordoma tissues; (B) Moderate expression of hTERT in chordoma tissues; (C) Strong expression of hTERT in chordoma tissues; (D) Negative hTERT expression in nucleus pulposus tissues; (E) Weak hTERT expression in nucleus pulposus tissues (×400). (F) Summary of hTERT expression data in chordoma and nucleus pulposus tissues.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of hTERT and Ki-67 levels and ROC analysis in chordoma and nucleus pulposus tissues. (A) Association of hTERT and Ki-67 index level via Pearson correlation test. (B) Receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis to discriminate chordoma from control tissues. An optimum cut-off point was determined (immunostaining score = 71%) for hTERT expression. The area under the curve was 0.999 (p < 0.001).

Association of hTERT levels with the Ki-67 proliferative index

To investigate the potential association of hTERT levels with tumor cell proliferation, we analyzed Ki-67 expression in chordoma tissues and found diverse intensities of Ki-67 immunostaining that were restricted to the cell nuclei. Our data indicated that the mean hTERT expression levels were significantly higher in chordoma tissues with a high Ki-67 proliferative index when compared with tissues with a low Ki-67 index (231.55 ± 56.04% vs. 142.24 ± 43.00%, respectively, t = -6.616, p < 0.001, Table 1). hTERT expression was closely associated with Ki-67 expression in chordoma tissues (Figure 3A; r = 0.716, p < 0.001; Table 2).

Table 2.

Association between hTERT expression and Ki-67 proliferative index in spinal chordoma tissues

Ki-67 index hTERT expression p-value

Low High
Low 23 2 0.000
High 10 19

hTERT, human telomerase reverse transcriptase.

Association of hTERT expression with clinicopathological factors

We investigated the association of hTERT expression with other clinicopathological characteristics and found that mean hTERT expression levels were significantly associated with muscle tissue invasion by the tumor (215.17 ± 61.68% vs. 144.21 ± 51.65% in tumors with or without muscle tissue invasion, respectively, t = -4.496, p < 0.001). Increased muscle tissue infiltration by TILs was also associated with high hTERT expression (F = 5.278, p = 0.008). Mean hTERT expression in tumor tissues with rare/few, moderate and severe TIL infiltration levels was 159.17 ± 63.44%, 204.00 ± 56.76% and 221.88 ± 65.67%, respectively. Subgroup analysis indicated that there was a significant difference in hTERT expression between tumor tissues with rare/few and moderate levels of TIL infiltration (p = 0.035, LSD test), and between rare/few and severe levels of TIL infiltration (p = 0.003). No statistically significant associations were seen between any of the other clinicopathological factors examined and hTERT expression (Tables 1 and 2).

hTERT expression and spine chordoma patient survival

Patient outcomes were followed-up until September 2015. Median LRFS and OS were 21.0 months (range, 3 to 45 months) and 48.0 months (range, 5 to 158 months), respectively. During the follow-up period, 41 patients (75.93%) had local recurrence of chordoma and 24 patients (44.44%) died. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis stratified according to high and low hTERT expression (mean immunostaining score, 190.20 ± 67.20%) indicated that patients with high hTERT expression exhibited significantly shorter LRFS when compared with patients with low hTERT expression (Table 3 and Figure 4A). We also found that patients with a high Ki-67 proliferative index had significantly shorter LRFS when compared with patients that had a low Ki-67 index (Table 3 and Figure 4B). High hTERT expression levels and a high Ki-67 index were associated with much poorer survival when compared with low hTERT expression and low Ki-67 index tumors (median, 26 vs. 12 months, p < 0.001 via the log-rank test; Table 3 and Figure 4C). Old age (Table 3 and Figure 4D), muscle invasion (Table 3 and Figure 4E), tumor hemorrhage (Table 3 and Figure 4F), and Enneking inappropriate resection (Table 3 and Figure 4H) were significantly associated with poor LRFS. Additionally, TIL infiltration levels were significantly associated with LRFS (Table 3 and Figure 4G); however, this difference was only observed between tumors with rare/few and moderate TILs (median, 24 vs. 16 months, p = 0.004 via the log-rank test).

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses of prognostic factors for local recurrence-free survival

Factors Categories Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis

χ2 p-value p-value HR (95% CI)
Sex Male/Female 2.949 0.08
Age ≤ 50/> 50 6.560 0.01 0.10 1.95 (0.86-4.40)
Tumor size ≤ 5 cm/> 5 cm 0.278 0.59
Tumor location Sacral vertebra/Cervical or thoracic or lumbar vertebra 0.003 0.95
Preoperative recurrence Yes/No 0.954 0.32
Surrounding muscle invasion Yes/No 24.585 0.000 0.006 4.66 (1.54-14.04)
Grade High/Low 0.231 0.63
Stage IA/IB/IIA/IIB/III 0.960 0.91
Type of resection EI/EA 16.472 0.000 0.003 3.47 (1.54-7.80)
Tumor hemorrhage Yes/No 4.031 0.04 0.30 1.81 (0.58-5.62)
Tumor necrosis Absent/mild/moderate/severe 0.189 0.97
Level of TILs Absent/Rare or few/moderate/Prominent 6.559 0.038 0.27 0.77 (0.48-1.23)
hTERT expression High/Low 19.075 0.000 0.016 1.01 (1.00-1.02)
Ki-67 index High/Low 14.163 0.000 0.029 3.00 (1.12-8.04)
hTERT/Ki-67 coexpression Low/Low 21.885 0.000a
High/Low and Low/High
High/High

EI, Enneking inappropriate; EA, Enneking appropriate; TILs, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; hTERT, human telomerase reverse transcriptase.

a

hTERT/Ki-67 coexpression was not used as a dependent variable in the multivariate analysis, because it depends on hTERT expression and Ki-67 index and seems to be confounded with them.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Kaplan-Meier curves of the local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) of patients. (A) Stratified by hTERT expression (p < 0.001 via log-rank test); (B) Stratified by Ki-67 expression (p < 0.001); (C) Stratified by hTERT/Ki-67 coexpression (p = 0.010); (D) Stratified by age (p = 0.010); (E) Stratified by tumor invasion into the surrounding muscle (p < 0.001); (F) Stratified by tumor hemorrhage (p = 0.045); (G) Stratified by tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte level (p = 0.038); and (H) Stratified by type of surgical resection (p < 0.001).

Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that muscle invasion (Table 4 and Figure 5A), Enneking inappropriate resection (Table 4 and Figure 5B) and tumor stage (Table 4 and Figure 5C) were associated with poor OS. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analysis indicated that high hTERT expression (HR = 1.013, 95% CI: 1.002-1.024, p = 0.016; Table 3), a high Ki-67 index (HR = 3.002, 95% CI: 1.120-8.044, p = 0.029; Table 3), tumor muscle invasion (HR = 4.657, 95% CI: 1.545-14.040, p = 0.006; Table 3) and Enneking inappropriate resection (HR = 3.472, 95% CI: 1.545-7.805, p = 0.003; Table 3) were independent predictors of LRFS. However, this analysis did not indicate that these parameters were independent predictors of OS in spinal chordoma patients (Table 4).

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses of prognostic factors for overall survival

Factors Categories Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis

χ2 p-value p-value HR (95% CI)
Sex Male/Female 1.54 0.21
Age ≤ 50/> 50 1.45 0.22
Tumor size ≤ 5 cm/> 5 cm 0.12 0.72
Tumor location Sacral vertebra/Cervical or thoracic or lumbar vertebra 0.13 0.71
Preoperative recurrence Yes/No 0.54 0.46
Tumor invasion into the Surrounding muscle Yes/No 6.79 0.009 0.10 2.44 (0.82-7.22)
Tumor grade High/Low 0.64 0.42
Tumor stage IA/IB/IIA/IIB/III 22.30 0.000 0.31 1.20 (0.84-1.72)
Resection type EI/EA 5.89 0.015 0.19 1.82 (0.74-4.46)
Tumor hemorrhage Yes/No 0.31 0.57
Tumor necrosis Absent/mild/moderate/severe 4.03 0.25
Level of TILs Absent/Rare or few/moderate/Prominent 0.03 0.98
hTERT level High/Low 1.78 0.18
Ki-67 index Ki-67 index, High/Low 2.04 0.15
hTERT/Ki-67 coexpression Low/Low 3.13 0.20
High/Low and Low/High
High/High

EI, Enneking inappropriate; EA, Enneking appropriate; TILs, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; hTERT, human telomerase reverse transcriptase.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Kaplan-Meier curves of the overall survival of spinal chordoma patients. (A) Stratified by tumor invasion into the surrounding muscle (p = 0.009 via log-rank test); (B) Stratified by type of surgical resection (p = 0.015); and (C) Stratified by tumor stage (p < 0.001).

Discussion

In this study, we assessed hTERT expression in spinal chordoma tissue samples and investigated the association of hTERT expression with the clinicopathological and survival data of the patients enrolled in the study. We found that hTERT protein expression was increased in chordoma tissues when compared with nucleus pulposus tissues. Upregulated hTERT protein expression was associated with tumor invasion of the surrounding muscle tissue, increased TIL infiltration, a high Ki-67 index and poor LRFS. hTERT expression was an independent predictor of LRFS in spinal chordoma patients; however, it was not associated with OS. This study indicates that measuring hTERT expression levels could be useful for predicting tumor progression and LRFS. Future studies are needed to evaluate whether hTERT could be an effective therapeutic target for spinal chordoma treatment.

Few studies have been conducted characterizing the molecular biology and molecular biomarkers of chordoma. Increased expression of various proteins (Survivin, SPHK1, PDGFR-α, EGFR, c-MET, VEGFR2 and iNOS) has been associated with the prognosis of spinal chordoma patients [32-35]. However, most of the studies investigating the expression of these proteins in chordoma did not perform multivariate adjustment for their statistical analysis [36], which may have introduced bias to the data [37]. In the current study, we assessed hTERT expression and performed a multivariate analysis to adjust for the influence of other clinicopathological data (such as age, gender and tumor stage) on hTERT expression and patient survival. We found that hTERT was predominantly expressed in spinal chordoma tissues, but was rarely expressed in nucleus pulposus tissues. This result is consistent with previous studies that reported hTERT detection in most human cancers, including chordoma, but not in benign or normal tissues [3,38,39]. Difference in hTERT protein expression between normal and malignant cells suggests that different cell types may have different proliferation or turnover rates [20]. Based on this speculation, the higher levels of hTERT expression in chordoma lesions when compared with nucleus pulposus tissues indicates that chordoma cells may need higher hTERT expression to maintain chromosomal stability and cell proliferation. Supporting this hypothesis, previous studies have demonstrated that hTERT is a telomerase activity marker and reported that a large tumor lesion expressed more hTERT due to a higher proliferation potential and the need for more telomerase activity to maintain tumor cell growth [20,40]. This finding may at least partially account for the upregulated hTERT expression observed in a large spinal chordoma, due to its indolent and low-grade nature [1].

This study associated hTERT expression with the Ki-67 labeling index. This result is supported by a previous study showing an association between hTERT expression and the Ki-67 labeling index in colorectal cancer with hepatic metastases [40]. Ki-67 is an antigen that reflects cell proliferation, and it is reasonable to suggest that tumor cells with high Ki-67 expression would need increased telomerase activity to maintain cell growth. Furthermore, previous studies reported mutations of the hTERT promoter [41] and increased TERT transcription to induce hTERT expression in human cancers [42,43]. The current study does not address whether or not the increased hTERT expression observed in chordoma is related to mutations in the TERT promoter.

The current study demonstrates a statistically significant association between elevated hTERT expression and muscle tissue invasion by chordoma tumors. Previous studies have demonstrated significant associations between hTERT expression and tumor histological types, clinical staging and histological grading in various human cancer types [21,44-46]. hTERT has also been shown to contribute to the invasion and metastasis of melanoma [47] and esophageal squamous cell cancer [48]. An in vitro study reported that exogenous hTERT expression also promoted invasiveness and metastasis of hepatoma HepG2 cells [49]. These data may support the non-reverse transcriptase activity of hTERT in promoting epithelial mesenchymal transition [50], which has been postulated to be a requirement for tumor invasion and metastasis [51]. The current study provides the first evidence that hTERT expression is associated with the level of TIL invasion into chordoma tissues. Previous studies have shown that TILs express programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and are associated with the elevated expression of programmed cell death-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) in various cancers [28,52,53]. The interaction of PD-1 with PD-L1 is a mechanism that may allow tumors to escape from the host’s immune response [54]. Intra-tumoral infiltration of PD1-positive lymphocytes has been associated with the progression of human cancers [28,53]. This suggests that hTERT expression may not only be a marker of cell proliferation, but also could be necessary for chordoma progression and play a role in tumor evasion from host immunity. However, although previous studies have demonstrated an analogous association [46], our current study failed to show any association between hTERT expression and the histological grade of chordoma. This inconsistency may be due to our small sample size and correspondingly low statistical power.

Previous studies have associated hTERT mRNA levels and telomerase activity with the prognosis of many cancers [20,26,38,40]. In our current study, log-rank analysis revealed that the LRFS of spinal chordoma patients was significantly shorter when hTERT expression was high. This indicates that hTERT is an oncoprotein, or that hTERT has oncogenic functions in spinal chordoma cells. We chose the mean value of hTERT expression in chordoma tissues as a cut-off point for high vs. low hTERT expression. Although this hTERT expression value represents an arbitrary choice, we were able to use this cut-off point to predict LRFS or OS of patients. Based on our current data and the results from previously published studies, hTERT should be further assessed as a potential therapeutic target for spinal chordoma. hTERT has recently emerged as a promising target for a therapeutic cancer vaccine [55-59]. In one example, Vx-001, an HLAA*0201-associated optimized cryptic peptide derived from TERT, induced tumor immunity but not autoimmunity in HLA-A*0201 transgenic mice [55]. In vitro, Vx-001 stimulated cytotoxic T-lymphocytes to kill hTERT-expressing tumor cells but not normal cells from healthy donors and prostate cancer patients [56]. In a phase I clinical trial, vaccination therapy with Vx-001 was administered to 19 patients with advanced cancers. Approximately 90% of the patients in the trial mounted a TERT-specific immune response, and the trial reported a favorable safety profile with no evidence of serious adverse events [57]. Additionally, several phase II clinical trials reported that patients exposed to Vx-001 achieved significantly improved overall survival when compared to non-responders [58,59].

The current study has several limitations that must be considered. First, the study is a correlation study and lacks cell-function experiments. Thus, further study is needed to determine how hTERT expression promotes tumor progression and influences the clinical outcome of spinal chordoma patients. Second, the study was retrospective, conducted in a single institution and included only a small number of patients; therefore, additional well-designed prospective studies involving large sample sizes and long-term follow-up are needed to validate our current findings. Finally, a panel of biomarkers, including surrogate biomarkers of angiogenesis, tissue invasion, self-sufficiency in growth signals and insensitivity to anti-growth signals [60] should be evaluated along with hTERT to enable better prediction of the overall biologic behavior of spinal chordoma.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Auragene Bioscience (Changsha, China) for technical support and Medjaden Bioscience Limited (Hong Kong, China) for assistance in preparation of the manuscript.

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Zhou M, Chen K, Yang H, Wang G, Lu J, Ji Y, Wu C, Chen C. Expression of insulin-like growth factor II mRNA-binding protein 3 (IMP3) in sacral chordoma. J Neurooncol. 2014;116:77–82. doi: 10.1007/s11060-013-1274-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Samson IR, Springfield DS, Suit HD, Mankin HJ. Operative treatment of sacrococcygeal chordoma. A review of twenty-one cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1476–1484. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199310000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hu H, Yang HL, Lu J, Chen KW, Qiu YH, Liu W, Luo ZP. Association of telomerase expression with recurrence of sacral chordoma. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2772. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Walcott BP, Nahed BV, Mohyeldin A, Coumans JV, Kahle KT, Ferreira eMJ. Chordoma: current concepts, management, and future directions. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:e69–76. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70337-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lee-Jones L, Aligianis I, Davies PA, Puga A, Farndon PA, Stemmer-Rachamimov A, Ramesh V, Sampson JR. Sacrococcygeal chordomas in patient with tuberous sclerosis complex show somatic loss of TSC1 or TSC2. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2004;41:80–85. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bompas E, Le Cesne A, Tresch-Bruneel E, Lebellec L, Laurence V, Collard O, Saada-Bouzid E, Isambert N, Blay JY, Amela EY, Salas S, Chevreau C, Bertucci F, Italiano A, Clisant S, Penel N. Sorafenib in patients with locally advanced and metastatic chordomas: a phase II trial of the French Sarcoma Group (GSF/GETO) Ann Oncol. 2015;26:2168–2173. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chugh R, Tawbi H, Lucas DR, Biermann JS, Schuetze SM, Baker LH. Chordoma: the nonsarcoma primary bone tumor. Oncologist. 2007;12:1344–1350. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-11-1344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Angelini A, Pala E, Calabrò T, Maraldi M, Ruggieri P. Prognostic factors in surgical resection of sacral chordoma. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112:344–351. doi: 10.1002/jso.23987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Park L, Delaney TF, Liebsch NJ, Hornicek FJ, Goldberg S, Mankin H, Rosenberg AE, Rosenthal DI, Suit HD. Sacral chordomas: Impact of high-dose proton/photon-beam radiation therapy combined with or without surgery for primary versus recurrent tumor. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65:1514–1521. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.02.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fourney DR, Gokaslan ZL. Current management of sacral chordoma. Neurosurg Focus. 2003;15:E9. doi: 10.3171/foc.2003.15.2.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Catton C, O’Sullivan B, Bell R, Laperriere N, Cummings B, Fornasier V, Wunder J. Chordoma: long-term follow-up after radical photon irradiation. Radiother Oncol. 1996;41:67–72. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(96)91805-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cheng EY, Ozerdemoglu RA, Transfeldt EE, Thompson RC Jr. Lumbosacr-al chordoma. Prognostic factors and treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:1639–1645. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199908150-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fuchs B, Dickey ID, Yaszemski MJ, Inwards CY, Sim FH. Operative man-agement of sacral chordoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2211–2216. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hulen CA, Temple HT, Fox WP, Sama AA, Green BA, Eismont FJ. Oncol-ogic and functional outcome following sacrectomy for sacral chordoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1532–1539. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rich TA, Schiller A, Suit HD, Mankin HJ. Clinical and pathologic review of 48 cases of chordoma. Cancer. 1985;56:182–187. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850701)56:1<182::aid-cncr2820560131>3.0.co;2-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ariel IM, Verdu C. Chordoma: an analysis of twenty cases treated over a twenty-year span. J Surg Oncol. 1975;7:27–44. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930070106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kayani B, Sewell MD, Tan KA, Hanna SA, Williams R, Pollock R, Skinner J, Briggs TW. Prognostic factors in the operative management of sacral chordomas. World Neurosurg. 2015;84:1354–61. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zou MX, Huang W, Wang XB, Li J, Lv GH, Wang B, Deng YW. Reduced expression of miRNA-1237-3p associated with poor survival of spinal chordoma patients. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:1738–1746. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3927-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nakamura TM, Morin GB, Chapman KB, Weinrich SL, Andrews WH, Lingner J, Harley CB, Cech TR. Telomerase catalytic subunit homologs from fission yeast and human. Science. 1997;277:955–959. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5328.955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chen HH, Yu CH, Wang JT, Liu BY, Wang YP, Sun A, Tsai TC, Chiang CP. Expression of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) protein is significantly associated with the progression, recurrence and prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma in Taiwan. Oral Oncol. 2007;43:122–129. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2006.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bertorelle R, Briarava M, Rampazzo E, Biasini L, Agostini M, Maretto I, Lonardi S, Friso ML, Mescoli C, Zagonel V, Nitti D, De Rossi A, Pucciarelli S. Telomerase is an independent prognostic marker of overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:278–284. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li J, Li H, Liu J, Feng B, Feng M, Lv B, Cheng S, Yang X. The Clinical Implications of Human Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Expression in Grade and Prognosis of Gliomas: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Mol Neurobiol. 2015 doi: 10.1007/s12035-015-9170-x. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kelland L. Targeting the limitless replicative potential of cancer: the telomerase/telomere pathway. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:4960–4963. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yoo J, Park SY, Kang SJ, Kim BK, Shim SI, Kang CS. Expression of telomerase activity, human telomerase RNA, and telomerase reverse transcriptase in gastric adenocarcinomas. Mod Pathol. 2003;16:700–707. doi: 10.1097/01.MP.0000077517.44687.B6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wei R, Younes M. Immunohistochemical detection of telomerase reverse transcriptase in colorectal adenocarcinoma and benign colonic mucosa. Hum Pathol. 2002;33:693–696. doi: 10.1053/hupa.2002.124719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sakabe R, Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, Hashimoto Y, Kondo N, Nakashima A, Ohge H, Sueda T, Hiyama E. Prognostic significance of telomerase activity and human telomerase reverse transcriptase expression in ampullary carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3072–3080. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2245-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Butler MG, Dahir GA, Hedges LK, Juliao SF, Sciadini MF, Schwartz HS. Cytogenetic, telomere, and telomerase studies in five surgically managed lumbosacral chordomas. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1995;85:51–57. doi: 10.1016/0165-4608(95)00127-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Feng Y, Shen J, Gao Y, Liao Y, Cote G, Choy E, Chebib I, Mankin H, Hornicek F, Duan Z. Expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and prevalence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in chordoma. Oncotarget. 2015;6:11139–11149. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fisher CG, Saravanja DD, Dvorak MF, Rampersaud YR, Clarkson PW, Hurlbert J, Fox R, Zhang H, Lewis S, Riaz S, Ferguson PC, Boyd MC. Surgical management of primary bone tumors of the spine: validation of an approach to enhance cure and reduce local recurrence. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:830–836. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e502e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:43–66. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.57.1.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Søreide K. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarker research. J Clin Pathol. 2009;62:1–5. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2008.061010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chen C, Yang HL, Chen KW, Wang GL, Lu J, Yuan Q, Gu YP, Luo ZP. High expression of survivin in sacral chordoma. Med Oncol. 2013;30:529. doi: 10.1007/s12032-013-0529-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang K, Chen H, Wu G, Chen K, Yang H. High expression of SPHK1 in sacral chordoma and association with patients’ poor prognosis. Med Oncol. 2014;31:247. doi: 10.1007/s12032-014-0247-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Akhavan-Sigari R, Gaab MR, Rohde V, Abili M, Ostertag H. Expression of PDGFR-α, EGFR and c-MET in spinal chordoma: a series of 52 patients. Anticancer Res. 2014;34:623–630. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Akhavan-Sigari R, Gaab MR, Rohde V, Abili M, Ostertag H. Prognostic significance of immunohistochemical expression of VEGFR2 and iNOS in spinal chordoma. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:2416–2422. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3417-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zou MX, Huang W, Wang XB, Li J, Lv GH, Deng YW. Prognostic factors in spinal chordoma: A systematic review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;139:110–118. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hayden JA, Côté P, Bombardier C. Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:427–437. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-6-200603210-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hiyama E, Hiyama K. Clinical utility of telomerase in cancer. Oncogene. 2002;21:643–649. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kim NW, Piatyszek MA, Prowse KR, Harley CB, West MD, Ho PL, Coviello GM, Wright WE, Weinrich SL, Shay JW. Specific association of human telomerase activity with immortal cells and cancer. Science. 1994;266:2011–2015. doi: 10.1126/science.7605428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Smith DL, Soria JC, Morat L, Yang Q, Sabatier L, Liu DD, Nemr RA, Rashid A, Vauthey JN. Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) and Ki-67 are better predictors of survival than established clinical indicators in patients undergoing curative hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11:45–51. doi: 10.1007/BF02524345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang K, Liu T, Liu L, Liu J, Liu C, Wang C, Ge N, Ren H, Yan K, Hu S, Björkholm M, Fan Y, Xu D. TERT promoter mutations in renal cell carcinomas and upper tract urothelial carcinomas. Oncotarget. 2014;5:1829–1836. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Huang FW, Hodis E, Xu MJ, Kryukov GV, Chin L, Garraway LA. Highly recurrent TERT promoter mutations in human melanoma. Science. 2013;339:957–959. doi: 10.1126/science.1229259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Horn S, Figl A, Rachakonda PS, Fischer C, Sucker A, Gast A, Kadel S, Moll I, Nagore E, Hemminki K, Schadendorf D, Kumar R. TERT promoter mutations in familial and sporadic melanoma. Science. 2013;339:959–961. doi: 10.1126/science.1230062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gertler R, Rosenberg R, Stricker D, Werner M, Lassmann S, Ulm K, Nekarda H, Siewert JR. Prognostic potential of the telomerase subunit human telomerase reverse transcriptase in tumor tissue and nontumorous mucosa from patients with colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 2002;95:2103–2111. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hiyama E, Yamaoka H, Matsunaga T, Hayashi Y, Ando H, Suita S, Horie H, Kaneko M, Sasaki F, Hashizume K, Nakagawara A, Ohnuma N, Yokoyama T. High expression of telomerase is an independent prognostic indicator of poor outcome in hepatoblastoma. Br J Cancer. 2004;91:972–979. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Metzger R, Vallbohmer D, Müller-Tidow C, Higashi H, Bollschweiler E, Warnecke-Eberz U, Brabender J, Baldus SE, Xi H, Berdel WE, Serve H, Hoelscher AH, Schneider PM. Increased human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) mRNA expression but not telomerase activity is related to survival in curatively resected nonsmall cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:1157–1162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bagheri S, Nosrati M, Li S, Fong S, Torabian S, Rangel J, Moore DH, Federman S, Laposa RR, Baehner FL, Sagebiel RW, Cleaver JE, Haqq C, Debs RJ, Blackburn EH, Kashani-Sabet M. Genes and pathways downstream of telomerase in melanoma metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:11306–11311. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510085103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Okawa T, Michaylira CZ, Kalabis J, Stairs DB, Nakagawa H, Andl CD, Johnstone CN, Klein-Szanto AJ, El-Deiry WS, Cukierman E, Herlyn M, Rustgi AK. The functional interplay between EGFR overexpression, hTERT activation, and p53 mutation in esophageal epithelial cells with activation of stromal fibroblasts induces tumor development, invasion, and differentiation. Genes Dev. 2007;21:2788–2803. doi: 10.1101/gad.1544507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chen PC, Peng JR, Huang L, Li WX, Wang WZ, Cui ZQ, Han H, Gong L, Xiang DP, Qiao SS, Yu X, Wei YH, Ma LP, Li N, Zhu JY, Leng XS. Overexpression of human telomerase reverse transcriptase promotes the motility and invasiveness of HepG2 cells in vitro. Oncol Rep. 2013;30:1157–1164. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Qin Y, Guo H, Tang B, Yang SM. The non-reverse transcriptase activity of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase promotes tumor progression (review) Int J Oncol. 2014;45:525–531. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Thiery JP, Acloque H, Huang RY, Nieto MA. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell. 2009;139:871–890. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Berghoff AS, Kiesel B, Widhalm G, Rajky O, Ricken G, Wöhrer A, Dieckmann K, Filipits M, Brandstetter A, Weller M, Kurscheid S, Hegi ME, Zielinski CC, Marosi C, Hainfellner JA, Preusser M, Wick W. Programmed death ligand 1 expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2015;17:1064–1075. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Berghoff AS, Ricken G, Widhalm G, Rajky O, Dieckmann K, Birner P, Bartsch R, Holler C, Preusser M. Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes and expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in melanoma brain metastases. Histopathology. 2015;66:289–299. doi: 10.1111/his.12537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Dong H, Strome SE, Salomao DR, Tamura H, Hirano F, Flies DB, Roche PC, Lu J, Zhu G, Tamada K, Lennon VA, Celis E, Chen L. Tumorassociated B7-H1 promotes T-cell apoptosis: a potential mechanism of immune evasion. Nat Med. 2002;8:793–800. doi: 10.1038/nm730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gross DA, Graff-Dubois S, Opolon P, Cornet S, Alves P, Bennaceur-Griscelli A, Faure O, Guillaume P, Firat H, Chouaib S, Lemonnier FA, Davoust J, Miconnet I, Vonderheide RH, Kosmatopoulos K. High vaccination efficiency of low-affinity epitopes in antitumor immunotherapy. J Clin Invest. 2004;113:425–433. doi: 10.1172/JCI19418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hernandez J, Garcia-Pons F, Lone YC, Firat H, Schmidt JD, Langlade-Demoyen P, Zanetti M. Identification of a human telomerase reverse transcriptase peptide of low affinity for HLA A2.1 that induces cytotoxic T lymphocytes and mediates lysis of tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:12275–12280. doi: 10.1073/pnas.182418399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mavroudis D, Bolonakis I, Cornet S, Myllaki G, Kanellou P, Kotsakis A, Galanis A, Nikoloudi I, Spyropoulou M, Menez J, Miconnet I, Niniraki M, Cordopatis P, Kosmatopoulos K, Georgoulias V. A phase I study of the optimized cryptic peptide TERT(572y) in patients with advanced malignancies. Oncology. 2006;70:306–314. doi: 10.1159/000096252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bolonaki I, Kotsakis A, Papadimitraki E, Aggouraki D, Konsolakis G, Vagia A, Christophylakis C, Nikoloudi I, Magganas E, Galanis A, Cordopatis P, Kosmatopoulos K, Georgoulias V, Mavroudis D. Vaccination of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with an optimized cryptic human telomerase reverse transcriptase peptide. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007;25:2727–2734. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.3465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kotsakis A, Vetsika EK, Christou S, Hatzidaki D, Vardakis N, Aggouraki D, Konsolakis G, Georgoulias V, Christophyllakis Ch, Cordopatis P, Kosmatopoulos K, Mavroudis D. Clinical outcome of patients with various advanced cancer types vaccinated with an optimized cryptic human telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) peptide: results of an expanded phase II study. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:442–449. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100:57–70. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81683-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Translational Research are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES