Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Heart logoLink to Heart
. 1997 Mar;77(3):256–259. doi: 10.1136/hrt.77.3.256

Influence of coronary nursing management follow up on lifestyle after acute myocardial infarction.

R Carlsson 1, G Lindberg 1, L Westin 1, B Israelsson 1
PMCID: PMC484693  PMID: 9093045

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the ability of a secondary prevention programme to improve the lifestyle in myocardial infarction patients aged 50-70 years. DESIGN: Habitual physical activity, food habits, and smoking habits were assessed from questionnaires at admission to hospital and at the one year follow up. Initially, all patients were invited to join an exercise programme and were informed about cardiovascular risk factors. Four weeks after discharge from the hospital, 87 patients were randomised to follow up at the coronary prevention unit by a special trained nurse (the intervention group), and 81 to follow up by their general practitioners (the usual care group). After randomisation, the intervention group was educated about the effects of smoking cessation, dietary management, and regular physical activity. The intervention group also participated in a physical training programme two to three times weekly for 10-12 weeks. MAIN RESULTS: 89% of the patients referred to the intervention group improved their food habits compared with 62% of the patients referred to the usual care group (P = 0.008). Furthermore, 50% of the smokers referred to the intervention group stopped smoking compared to 29% in the usual care group (P = 0.09). Changes in physical activity did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This secondary prevention programme based on a nurse rehabilitator was successful in improving food habits in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Initiating the smoking cessation programme during the hospital stay followed by repeated counselling during follow up might have improved the results. The exercise programme had no advantage in supporting physical activity compared to usual care.

Full text

PDF
256

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burgess A. W., Lerner D. J., D'Agostino R. B., Vokonas P. S., Hartman C. R., Gaccione P. A randomized control trial of cardiac rehabilitation. Soc Sci Med. 1987;24(4):359–370. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(87)90154-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DeBusk R. F., Miller N. H., Superko H. R., Dennis C. A., Thomas R. J., Lew H. T., Berger W. E., 3rd, Heller R. S., Rompf J., Gee D. A case-management system for coronary risk factor modification after acute myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 1994 May 1;120(9):721–729. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-9-199405010-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Heller R. F., Knapp J. C., Valenti L. A., Dobson A. J. Secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1993 Oct 1;72(11):759–762. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)91058-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Horlick L., Cameron R., Firor W., Bhalerao U., Baltzan R. The effects of education and group discussion in the post myocardial infarction patient. J Psychosom Res. 1984;28(6):485–492. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(84)90082-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kannel W. B., Sorlie P., McNamara P. M. Prognosis after initial myocardial infarction: the Framingham study. Am J Cardiol. 1979 Jul;44(1):53–59. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(79)90250-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kovacs J. A., Masur H. Are corticosteroids beneficial as adjunctive therapy for Pneumocystis pneumonia in AIDS? Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jul 1;113(1):1–3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-1-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Maeland J. G., Havik O. E. The effects of an in-hospital educational programme for myocardial infarction patients. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1987;19(2):57–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Marshall J., Penckofer S., Llewellyn J. Structured postoperative teaching and knowledge and compliance of patients who had coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart Lung. 1986 Jan;15(1):76–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ott C. R., Sivarajan E. S., Newton K. M., Almes M. J., Bruce R. A., Bergner M., Gilson B. S. A controlled randomized study of early cardiac rehabilitation: the Sickness Impact Profile as an assessment tool. Heart Lung. 1983 Mar;12(2):162–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pozen M. W., Stechmiller J. A., Harris W., Smith S., Fried D. D., Voigt G. C. A nurse rehabilitator's impact on patients with myocardial infarction. Med Care. 1977 Oct;15(10):830–837. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197710000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rahe R. H., Ward H. W., Hayes V. Brief group therapy in myocardial infarction rehabilitation: three- to four-year follow-up of a controlled trial. Psychosom Med. 1979 May;41(3):229–242. doi: 10.1097/00006842-197905000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Raleigh E. H., Odtohan B. C. The effect of a cardiac teaching program on patient rehabilitation. Heart Lung. 1987 May;16(3):311–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Scalzi C. C., Burke L. E., Greenland S. Evaluation of an inpatient educational program for coronary patients and families. Heart Lung. 1980 Sep-Oct;9(5):846–853. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ulvenstam G., Aberg A., Bergstrand R., Johansson S., Pennert K., Vedin A., Wedel H., Wilhelmsen L., Wilhelmsson C. Recurrent myocardial infarction. 1. Natural history of fatal and non-fatal events. Eur Heart J. 1985 Apr;6(4):294–302. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. White C. W., Lemon D. K., Albanese M. A. Efficacy of health education efforts in hospitalized patients with serious cardiovascular illness: can teaching succeed? Patient Couns Health Educ. 1980 4th Quart;2(4):189–196. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(80)80102-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES