Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine patients' views on how clinical and demographic factors should affect priorities for cardiac revascularisation. DESIGN: A descriptive survey of patients' views conducted immediately after angiography and treatment counselling. SUBJECTS: 136 patients who were awaiting coronary angioplasty in either of the two regional cardiology centres in Northern Ireland. RESULTS: About half the subjects (52%) felt that certain social factors such as having dependent relatives should be taken into account when deciding priority for surgery. A sizeable minority felt that younger subjects and non-smokers (40% and 44%, respectively) should be accorded higher priority, with older subjects and smokers being more likely to hold such views. CONCLUSIONS: While there is little evidence that demographic and lifestyle factors affect the relative efficacy of surgery, the challenge remains to devise a prioritisation guideline that can properly reflect societal values and the evidence base.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bengtson A., Herlitz J., Karlsson T., Hjalmarson A. Distress correlates with the degree of chest pain: a description of patients awaiting revascularisation. Heart. 1996 Mar;75(3):257–260. doi: 10.1136/hrt.75.3.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bhattacharya S. Access to heart surgery for smokers. Higher complication rate not confined to smokers. BMJ. 1993 May 22;306(6889):1409–1409. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6889.1409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Julian D. G. Smoking and coronary artery bypass surgery. Br Heart J. 1994 Jul;72(1):9–11. doi: 10.1136/hrt.72.1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kee F., Gaffney B., Canavan C., Little J., McConnell W., Telford A. M., Watson J. D. Expanding access to coronary artery bypass surgery: who stands to gain? Br Heart J. 1995 Feb;73(2):129–133. doi: 10.1136/hrt.73.2.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kee F., Gaffney B., Canavan C., Little J., McConnell W., Telford A. M., Watson J. D. Is choice of general practitioner important for patients having coronary artery investigations? Qual Health Care. 1994 Mar;3(1):17–22. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.1.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kee F., Gaffney B. Priority for coronary artery surgery: who gets by-passed when demand outstrips capacity? QJM. 1995 Jan;88(1):15–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- New B. The rationing agenda in the NHS. Rationing Agenda Group. BMJ. 1996 Jun 22;312(7046):1593–1601. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nord E. The significance of contextual factors in valuing health states. Health Policy. 1989;13(3):189–198. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(89)90092-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shiu M. Refusing to treat smokers is unethical and a dangerous precedent. BMJ. 1993 Apr 17;306(6884):1048–1049. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6884.1048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Underwood M. J., Bailey J. S. Coronary bypass surgery should not be offered to smokers. BMJ. 1993 Apr 17;306(6884):1047–1048. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6884.1047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zolese G. Access to heart surgery for smokers. Each patient a special case. BMJ. 1993 May 22;306(6889):1408–1408. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6889.1408-b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]